Source-specific country analysis
Trinidad and Tobago Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | $867.67M | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $875 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 94.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | $946.59M | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | $944 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 94.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | $1.14B | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $1,127 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | $1.38B | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | $1,344 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | $2.16B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $2,071 | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 138.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | $2.58B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $2,447 | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 148.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | $2.64B | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.4% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $2,475 | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 141.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | $3.31B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.1% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | $3,069 | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 158.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | $3.76B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.0% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | $3,439 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 152.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | $4.86B | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $4,386 | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 172.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | $6.58B | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 10.4% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | $5,868 | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | 210.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | $7.38B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | $6,502 | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 232.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | $8.59B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | $7,485 | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 274.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | $8.20B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -10.3% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | $7,061 | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 257.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | $8.19B | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -5.8% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | $6,981 | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 251.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | $7.79B | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -4.1% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | $6,557 | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 234.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | $5.06B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.3% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | $4,206 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 132.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | $5.06B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | $4,160 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 118.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | $4.75B | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.9% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | $3,859 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | $4.56B | 93 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.8% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | $3,675 | 64 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 92.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | $5.35B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 120 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | $4,272 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 98.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | $5.60B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $4,439 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 99.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | $5.74B | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.6% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | $4,515 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | $4.83B | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.4% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | $3,773 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 79.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | $5.22B | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $4,053 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 81.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | $5.63B | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $4,343 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 79.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | $6.08B | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.0% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $4,673 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 85.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | $6.06B | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.7% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | $4,638 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 86.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | $6.38B | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.2% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | $4,869 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 92.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | $7.19B | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | $5,467 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 101.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | $8.61B | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.9% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $6,522 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 118.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | $9.32B | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $7,028 | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 130.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | $9.51B | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.9% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | $7,140 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 129.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | $11.94B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 14.5% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | $8,916 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 145.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | $14.02B | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $10,423 | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 153.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | $16.88B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $12,483 | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | 171.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | $19.40B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 13.5% | 11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | $14,278 | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | 183.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | $22.86B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.5% | 128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $16,741 | 59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | 192.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | $29.44B | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $21,454 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 227.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | $20.25B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.4% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $14,687 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 166.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | $23.37B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.3% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $16,854 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 176.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | $26.87B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.3% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | $19,261 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 183.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | $27.15B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.3% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | $19,338 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 182.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | $28.56B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $20,218 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 188.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | $29.47B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $20,740 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 190.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | $26.84B | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.4% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | $18,781 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 184.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | $23.62B | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -7.5% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | $16,440 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 160.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | $23.83B | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.9% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | $16,489 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 153.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | $23.88B | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.9% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | $16,241 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 143.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | $23.48B | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | $15,811 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 139.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | $20.89B | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.8% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | $14,104 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 128.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | $24.22B | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.7% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | $16,282 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | $28.34B | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.9% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | $18,946 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 148.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | $25.04B | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | $16,659 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 125.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | $25.63B | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | $17,001 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 124.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$867.67M → $5.35B
Compound annual change: +9.5% CAGR$5.35B → $23.37B
Compound annual change: +7.7% CAGR$23.37B → $25.63B
Compound annual change: +0.7% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | $867.67M | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.70B | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | $946.59M | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.77B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | $1.14B | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.16B | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | $1.38B | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.28B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | $2.16B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.56B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | $2.58B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.67B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | $2.64B | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.16B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | $3.31B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.90B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | $3.76B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.80B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | $4.86B | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.15B | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | $6.58B | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $11.20B | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | $7.38B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $11.72B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | $8.59B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $12.16B | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | $8.20B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $10.91B | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | $8.19B | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $10.28B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | $7.79B | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $9.86B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | $5.06B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.53B | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | $5.06B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.10B | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | $4.75B | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.74B | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | $4.56B | 93 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.67B | 92 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | $5.35B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.80B | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | $5.60B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.04B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | $5.74B | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.89B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | $4.83B | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.76B | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | $5.22B | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.07B | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | $5.63B | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.43B | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | $6.08B | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.09B | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | $6.06B | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.87B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | $6.38B | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.76B | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | $7.19B | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.69B | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | $8.61B | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $13.57B | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | $9.32B | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $14.14B | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | $9.51B | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $15.26B | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | $11.94B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $17.47B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | $14.02B | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $18.86B | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | $16.88B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $20.03B | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | $19.40B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $22.74B | 96 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | $22.86B | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $23.75B | 97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | $29.44B | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.56B | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | $20.25B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $23.49B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | $23.37B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.27B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | $26.87B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.20B | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | $27.15B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.51B | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | $28.56B | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $25.34B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | $29.47B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $26.27B | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | $26.84B | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $26.16B | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | $23.62B | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.19B | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | $23.83B | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $23.01B | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | $23.88B | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $22.79B | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | $23.48B | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $22.90B | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | $20.89B | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $20.89B | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | $24.22B | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $20.74B | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | $28.34B | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $20.92B | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | $25.04B | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $21.22B | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | $25.63B | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $21.76B | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$875 → $4,272
Compound annual change: +8.3% CAGR$4,272 → $16,854
Compound annual change: +7.1% CAGR$16,854 → $17,001
Compound annual change: +0.1% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | $875 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 94.3 (world = 100) | $6,759 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 130.3 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | $944 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 94.3 (world = 100) | $6,753 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 127.4 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | $1,127 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | $7,057 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 128.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | $1,344 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | $7,083 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 124.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | $2,071 | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 138.2 (world = 100) | $7,262 | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 126.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | $2,447 | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 148.7 (world = 100) | $7,279 | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 128.5 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | $2,475 | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 141.7 (world = 100) | $7,653 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 130.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | $3,069 | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 158.8 (world = 100) | $8,247 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 137.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | $3,439 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 152.8 (world = 100) | $8,959 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 145.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | $4,386 | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 172.3 (world = 100) | $9,164 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | $5,868 | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | 210.3 (world = 100) | $9,986 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 158.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | $6,502 | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 232.1 (world = 100) | $10,321 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 163.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | $7,485 | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 274.3 (world = 100) | $10,594 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 170.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | $7,061 | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 257.0 (world = 100) | $9,398 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 149.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | $6,981 | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 251.4 (world = 100) | $8,764 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 135.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | $6,557 | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 234.2 (world = 100) | $8,301 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 126.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | $4,206 | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 132.7 (world = 100) | $7,923 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 119.2 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | $4,160 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 118.1 (world = 100) | $7,474 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 110.5 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | $3,859 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 99.7 (world = 100) | $7,106 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 102.4 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | $3,675 | 64 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 92.5 (world = 100) | $6,982 | 67 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 98.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | $4,272 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 98.5 (world = 100) | $7,027 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 98.2 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | $4,439 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 99.1 (world = 100) | $7,159 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 100.5 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | $4,515 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) | $6,988 | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 97.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | $3,773 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 79.7 (world = 100) | $6,840 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 95.4 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | $4,053 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 81.4 (world = 100) | $7,040 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 96.5 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | $4,343 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 79.9 (world = 100) | $7,280 | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 98.2 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | $4,673 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 85.3 (world = 100) | $7,759 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 102.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | $4,638 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 86.3 (world = 100) | $8,324 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 107.4 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | $4,869 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 92.4 (world = 100) | $8,973 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 114.2 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | $5,467 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 101.2 (world = 100) | $9,656 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 120.3 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | $6,522 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 118.8 (world = 100) | $10,282 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 124.3 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | $7,028 | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 130.5 (world = 100) | $10,666 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 128.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | $7,140 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 129.1 (world = 100) | $11,457 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 136.3 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | $8,916 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 145.6 (world = 100) | $13,047 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 152.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | $10,423 | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 153.1 (world = 100) | $14,015 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 159.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | $12,483 | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | 171.3 (world = 100) | $14,813 | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | 163.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | $14,278 | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | 183.1 (world = 100) | $16,734 | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | 179.4 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | $16,741 | 59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | 192.8 (world = 100) | $17,398 | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | 181.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | $21,454 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 227.9 (world = 100) | $17,902 | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 185.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | $14,687 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 166.5 (world = 100) | $17,030 | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 180.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | $16,854 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 176.7 (world = 100) | $17,501 | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 180.2 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | $19,261 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 183.8 (world = 100) | $17,347 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 175.1 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | $19,338 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 182.9 (world = 100) | $17,462 | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 173.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | $20,218 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 188.1 (world = 100) | $17,937 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 175.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | $20,740 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 190.3 (world = 100) | $18,485 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 177.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | $18,781 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 184.4 (world = 100) | $18,306 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 172.9 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | $16,440 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 160.7 (world = 100) | $16,834 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 156.6 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | $16,489 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 153.2 (world = 100) | $15,923 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 144.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | $16,241 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 143.6 (world = 100) | $15,501 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 138.1 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | $15,811 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 139.3 (world = 100) | $15,423 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 135.3 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | $14,104 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 128.7 (world = 100) | $14,104 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 128.7 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | $16,282 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.1 (world = 100) | $13,940 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 120.5 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | $18,946 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 148.0 (world = 100) | $13,983 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 118.0 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | $16,659 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 125.7 (world = 100) | $14,122 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 116.8 (world = 100) |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | $17,001 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 124.3 (world = 100) | $14,430 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 117.1 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
1.0% → 1.5%
Average annual rate: +1.5%1.5% → 3.3%
Average annual rate: +5.1%3.3% → 2.5%
Average annual rate: -0.4%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 3.8 | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 1.0% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -0.1% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 4.1 | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 5.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 4.5 | 99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 1.7% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 5.5 | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 3.8% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 2.5% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 8.7 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 1.5% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 10.8 | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 6.4% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 5.2% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 11.7 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 9.1% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 7.8% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 13.2 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 10.0% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 8.6% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 13.6 | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 3.6% | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.3% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 17.0 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 10.4% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 9.0% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 20.9 | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 4.6% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 3.4% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 22.4 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 3.8% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 2.6% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 25.1 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | -10.3% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | -11.3% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 26.7 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | -5.8% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | -6.8% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 28.3 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | -4.1% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | -5.3% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 28.7 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | -3.3% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | -4.5% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 28.3 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | -4.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | -5.7% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 29.7 | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | -3.9% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | -4.9% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 30.9 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | -0.8% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | -1.7% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 33.1 | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 1.5% | 120 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 0.6% | 105 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 38.3 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 2.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 1.9% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 39.0 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | -1.6% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | -2.4% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 40.7 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | -1.4% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -2.1% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 43.7 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 3.6% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 2.9% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 50.5 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 4.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 3.4% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 52.6 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 7.0% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 6.6% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 53.6 | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 7.7% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 7.3% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 51.6 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 8.2% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 7.8% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 50.6 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 8.0% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 7.6% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 52.8 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 6.9% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.5% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 59.2 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 4.2% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 3.7% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 60.8 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 7.9% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 7.4% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 57.7 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 14.5% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 13.9% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 63.7 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 8.0% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 7.4% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 69.4 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 6.2% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 5.7% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 78.6 | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 13.5% | 11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 13.0% | 9 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 79.8 | 51 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 75.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 4.5% | 128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 4.0% | 103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 90.2 | 27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 87.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 3.4% | 111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 2.9% | 88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 111.7 | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | -4.4% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -4.9% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 80.8 | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 3.3% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 2.8% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 90.9 | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | -0.3% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | -0.9% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 105.4 | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 1.3% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 105.5 | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 3.4% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 2.7% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 107.6 | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 3.7% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 3.1% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 106.5 | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | -0.4% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | -1.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 96.9 | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | -7.5% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | -8.0% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 96.5 | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | -4.9% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | -5.4% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 104.0 | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | -0.9% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | -2.6% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 105.1 | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 0.5% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | -0.5% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 102.6 | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | -8.8% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | -8.6% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | -0.7% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | -1.2% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 116.9 | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 0.9% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 135.6 | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 1.5% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 1.0% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 118.0 | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 2.5% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 2.2% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 117.8 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
74.9% → 70.9%
Percentage-point change: -4.0 pp70.9% → 64.9%
Percentage-point change: -6.1 pp64.9% → 76.3%
Percentage-point change: +11.4 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | 74.9% | 118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 61.9% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 13.1% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 100.8% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 72.9% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 57.1% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 15.8% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 106.9% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 77.2% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 61.1% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 16.0% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 108.5% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 70.0% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 55.7% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 14.3% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 96.0% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 55.0% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 43.6% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 11.3% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 76.8% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -23.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 56.2% | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world | 43.9% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 12.3% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 83.6% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 61.2% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 49.0% | 150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 12.2% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 85.8% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -15.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 62.2% | 165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 49.4% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 12.8% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 88.9% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 67.0% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 53.6% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 13.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 97.3% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 66.8% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 52.9% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 13.9% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 95.9% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 59.4% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | 47.3% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 12.1% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 90.0% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 65.5% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 52.9% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 12.6% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 93.3% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 79.7% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 59.1% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 20.6% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 108.8% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | 86.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 65.3% | 85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.3 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 21.0% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 111.9% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | 79.4% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 56.9% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 22.4% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 103.4% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | 78.8% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 56.1% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 22.7% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 97.6% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | 87.5% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 64.1% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 23.4% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 109.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | 81.1% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 59.5% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 21.6% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 100.4% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | 84.1% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 64.2% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 19.8% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 97.1% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | 77.4% | 106 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 60.5% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 16.9% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 93.9% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 70.9% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 54.8% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 16.2% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 84.8% | 193 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 77.2% | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 60.2% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 17.0% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 93.5% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | 77.1% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 59.3% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 17.8% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 90.9% | 187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | 80.8% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 63.7% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 17.0% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 95.1% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 67.0% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 51.8% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 15.1% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 87.2% | 195 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 64.7% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 48.8% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 15.9% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 85.5% | 197 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 65.4% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 49.5% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 15.8% | 104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 89.6% | 186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 73.1% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 57.7% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 15.4% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 103.2% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 71.9% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 57.6% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 14.4% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 105.3% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 73.2% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 58.5% | 135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 14.7% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 94.2% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 69.3% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 57.4% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 12.0% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 86.1% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 62.6% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 48.8% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 13.7% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 89.3% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 71.8% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 58.2% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 13.6% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 94.5% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 60.7% | 183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world | 48.0% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 12.7% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 85.9% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 65.2% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 53.2% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 12.1% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 85.1% | 182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 43.0% | 202 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -32.4 pp vs world | 31.4% | 199 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -27.3 pp vs world | 11.6% | 152 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 73.2% | 196 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -26.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 40.2% | 203 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -34.3 pp vs world | 29.2% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -28.8 pp vs world | 11.0% | 156 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.8 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 55.9% | 204 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -43.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 56.8% | 183 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 12.1 / 100 | -17.2 pp vs world | 46.0% | 171 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | 10.8% | 158 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 23.8 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 70.1% | 196 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -29.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 58.9% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -15.0 pp vs world | 48.7% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 10.2% | 172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.8 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 70.8% | 198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -28.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | 64.1% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 50.5% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 13.7% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 86.6% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 64.9% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 52.4% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 12.5% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 76.8% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -22.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | 61.3% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 49.5% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 11.8% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 70.7% | 198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -28.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 61.7% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 49.4% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 12.3% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 77.2% | 191 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -21.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 62.9% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 50.7% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 12.3% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 74.8% | 199 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -24.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 63.7% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 51.2% | 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.2 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 12.5% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 79.8% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | 65.9% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 52.9% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 13.0% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 91.0% | 185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | 71.1% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 57.2% | 143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 13.9% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 101.5% | 112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | 74.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 59.5% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 14.5% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 95.5% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | 73.7% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 59.3% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 14.5% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 89.8% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 74.4% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 59.8% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 14.6% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 93.2% | 172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | 79.4% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 63.8% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 15.5% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 101.7% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | 76.8% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 61.8% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 15.1% | 129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 88.0% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 72.5% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 58.3% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 14.2% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 76.7% | 193 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -22.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 76.0% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 61.1% | 116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 14.9% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 90.7% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 76.3% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 61.4% | 112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 15.0% | 123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 96.0% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
25.9% → 13.8%
Percentage-point change: -12.0 pp13.8% → 11.9%
Percentage-point change: -1.9 pp11.9% → 19.7%
Percentage-point change: +7.8 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | 25.9% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 20.9% | 85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 4.9% | 22 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 34.0% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 32.8% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 1.2% | 77 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 31.3% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 29.5% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 1.8% | 50 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 26.0% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 22.6% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 3.4% | 31 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 21.8% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 15.5% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 6.3% | 18 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 27.3% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 20.5% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 6.9% | 10 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 93.5 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 24.6% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 23.0% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 60 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 57.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 26.7% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 23.0% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 3.6% | 30 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 30.2% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 27.2% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 3.1% | 35 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 29.1% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 26.7% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 2.4% | 45 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 30.6% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 28.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 2.5% | 47 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 27.8% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 25.5% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 2.3% | 42 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 29.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 25.8% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 3.4% | 26 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 82.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | 25.7% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 25.7% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | -0.0% | 90 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | 24.0% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 23.4% | 68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 0.5% | 88 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | 18.8% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 20.2% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | -1.5% | 131 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 11.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | 21.6% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 20.8% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 64 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | 19.3% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 18.5% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 0.8% | 68 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | 13.1% | 162 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | 12.6% | 162 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 95 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | 16.6% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 14.8% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 1.8% | 43 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 13.8% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 13.8% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 129 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 16.3% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 15.8% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 0.5% | 102 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | 13.8% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 13.6% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 110 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | 14.4% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 13.9% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 89 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 47.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 20.2% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 19.8% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 103 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 39.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 20.8% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 18.9% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 1.8% | 63 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 24.3% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 23.0% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 64 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 30.1% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 29.3% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 0.8% | 77 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 33.4% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 31.4% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 2.0% | 42 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 21.0% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.6% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 0.4% | 81 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 52.1 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 16.8% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 15.6% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 1.2% | 69 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 26.7% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 26.4% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 109 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 22.6% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 21.9% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.7% | 81 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 25.2% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 24.2% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.9% | 74 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 19.9% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 18.7% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 1.1% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 30.2% | 40 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 81.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 28.6% | 37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 1.5% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 15.6% | 186 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 15.1% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 0.5% | 109 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 13.4% | 194 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 12.3% | 197 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 1.1% | 84 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 11.9% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 10.5% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 1.4% | 82 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 54.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | 22.4% | 104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 22.4% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 11.9% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world | 11.9% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | 9.4% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 9.4% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 15.6% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 15.6% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 11.9% | 199 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 11.9% | 198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 16.1% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 16.1% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | 25.1% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 25.1% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | 30.4% | 35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 30.4% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | 21.5% | 124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 21.5% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | 16.1% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 16.1% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 18.8% | 159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 18.8% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | 22.3% | 106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 22.3% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | 11.2% | 198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 197 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 4.2% | 209 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -23.0 pp vs world | 4.2% | 209 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -21.8 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 14.7% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 14.7% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 19.7% | 143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 19.7% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Trinidad and Tobago is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
95.4% → 82.7%
Percentage-point change: -12.8 pp82.7% → 84.2%
Percentage-point change: +1.5 pp84.2% → 84.0%
Percentage-point change: -0.2 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | 46.3% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +35.0 pp vs world | 49.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +37.9 pp vs world | -2.8% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 95.4% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +72.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 46.3% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +34.8 pp vs world | 56.5% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +45.1 pp vs world | -10.2% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 102.7% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +79.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 42.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +31.1 pp vs world | 54.5% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +42.9 pp vs world | -11.7% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 97.4% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +74.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 47.8% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +34.6 pp vs world | 45.2% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +32.3 pp vs world | 2.6% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 93.1% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +66.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 61.4% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +45.3 pp vs world | 38.0% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world | 23.5% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 99.4% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +67.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 57.4% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +42.1 pp vs world | 41.5% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +26.3 pp vs world | 15.9% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 98.9% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +68.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 60.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +44.7 pp vs world | 47.3% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +31.5 pp vs world | 13.1% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 107.8% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +76.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 53.7% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +37.9 pp vs world | 43.5% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 10.2% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 97.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +65.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 47.7% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +32.2 pp vs world | 46.8% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +31.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 94.5% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +63.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 48.8% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +31.9 pp vs world | 46.4% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world | 2.4% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 95.2% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +61.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 54.6% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +36.3 pp vs world | 46.0% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 8.7% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 100.6% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +63.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 47.4% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +29.4 pp vs world | 41.8% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 5.6% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 89.2% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +52.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 37.1% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 48.7% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +31.3 pp vs world | -11.6% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 85.8% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +51.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | 33.5% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 48.1% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | -14.7% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -14.4 pp vs world | 81.6% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +48.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | 34.8% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world | 39.8% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +22.7 pp vs world | -5.0% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 74.6% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +40.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | 35.3% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 33.5% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 1.7% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 68.8% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | 36.0% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 47.6% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +31.5 pp vs world | -11.6% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 83.6% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +51.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | 36.7% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 38.3% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | -1.6% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 75.0% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +41.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | 42.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +25.2 pp vs world | 40.2% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +23.0 pp vs world | 2.0% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 82.3% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +48.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | 46.2% | 42 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | 40.9% | 72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +23.2 pp vs world | 5.2% | 27 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 87.1% | 62 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +51.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 49.1% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world | 33.5% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 15.6% | 11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 82.7% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +44.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 44.5% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world | 38.6% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 5.9% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 83.1% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +45.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | 42.7% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 33.6% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 9.1% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 76.3% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +37.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | 44.0% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +25.2 pp vs world | 39.1% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 4.9% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 83.0% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +45.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 46.1% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | 33.2% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world | 12.8% | 12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 79.3% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +40.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 53.8% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +33.1 pp vs world | 39.2% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 14.5% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 93.0% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +52.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 51.4% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +30.3 pp vs world | 41.0% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +20.4 pp vs world | 10.4% | 20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 92.4% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +50.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 53.8% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +31.8 pp vs world | 57.0% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +35.5 pp vs world | -3.2% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 110.8% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +67.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 48.5% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 53.8% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +32.3 pp vs world | -5.3% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 102.3% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +59.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 50.0% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +28.1 pp vs world | 44.2% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 5.8% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 94.2% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +50.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 59.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +35.7 pp vs world | 45.3% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world | 13.9% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 104.6% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +57.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 55.3% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +32.4 pp vs world | 44.6% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 10.7% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 99.9% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +54.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 50.3% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world | 44.7% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | 5.5% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 95.0% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +48.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 51.8% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world | 37.7% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 14.1% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 89.5% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +41.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 54.4% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +28.6 pp vs world | 39.5% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 14.9% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 93.8% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +42.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 65.8% | 25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.4 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world | 39.0% | 119 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.0 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 26.8% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 104.8% | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +51.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 81.4% | 14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +52.7 pp vs world | 37.3% | 124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 44.1% | 3 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +43.5 pp vs world | 118.7% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +61.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 68.2% | 28 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +38.6 pp vs world | 38.3% | 126 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 39.6 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 29.9% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +29.1 pp vs world | 106.5% | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +48.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 68.9% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +37.9 pp vs world | 39.7% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 29.2% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | 108.5% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +47.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | 51.1% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +24.8 pp vs world | 37.6% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 13.4% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | 88.7% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +36.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 53.7% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world | 30.5% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 23.2% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world | 84.2% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +28.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | 72.1% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +41.7 pp vs world | 42.8% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 29.3% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | 114.9% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +55.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 66.4% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +36.2 pp vs world | 43.6% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 22.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +21.8 pp vs world | 110.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +50.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 67.0% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +36.9 pp vs world | 41.9% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | 25.2% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | 108.9% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +49.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 56.5% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | 36.3% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 20.2% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 92.8% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +34.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | 47.9% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 38.9% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 9.0% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 86.8% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | 40.0% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 41.6% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | -1.5% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 81.6% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +28.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | 44.6% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 40.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 4.5% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 84.6% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | 48.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 38.3% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 10.2% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 86.7% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +29.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 40.7% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 33.9% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 6.8% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 74.7% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | 30.8% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 32.5% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | -1.7% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 63.3% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | 47.6% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 35.7% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 12.0% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 83.3% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 62.0% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +31.1 pp vs world | 38.7% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 23.3% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 100.7% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +39.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 46.1% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 36.8% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 9.3% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 82.9% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 44.0% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 40.0% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 4.0% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 84.0% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Mining, manufacturing and utilities is the largest current activity at 31.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 0.19×
World specialization: 1.50×
World specialization: 0.85×
World specialization: 1.96×
World specialization: 0.73×
World specialization: 0.61×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
34.6% → 35.7%
Percentage-point change: +1.1 pp35.7% → 43.2%
Percentage-point change: +7.5 pp43.2% → 31.7%
Percentage-point change: -11.5 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | 7.5% | 129 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 34.6% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 6.1% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 19.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 13.8% | 8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 18.8% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 7.4% | 129 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 33.2% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 7.9% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 18.5% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 11.4% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 21.6% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 8.0% | 125 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 33.6% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 7.9% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 17.0% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 12.3% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 21.2% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 6.9% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 37.2% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 7.3% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 16.5% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 11.9% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 20.2% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 5.4% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 47.5% | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 6.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 14.8% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 8.2% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 17.2% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 5.5% | 136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 46.1% | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 8.0% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 14.6% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 7.2% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 18.5% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 6.4% | 130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 43.4% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 9.6% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 13.3% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 8.3% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 18.9% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 5.7% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 42.5% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 9.8% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 12.6% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 9.8% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 19.5% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 5.7% | 134 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 36.3% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 14.4% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 9.0% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 21.0% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 4.8% | 136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 39.1% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 12.5% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 12.4% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 8.9% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 22.4% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 3.8% | 144 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 42.6% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 12.4% | 8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 10.4% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 20.7% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 5.0% | 135 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 35.2% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 15.3% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 11.6% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 22.8% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 5.1% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 25.9% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 15.7% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 12.8% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 10.7% | 26 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 29.9% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | 5.6% | 126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 25.3% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 14.6% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 13.7% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 10.2% | 30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 30.5% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | 4.3% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 29.6% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 12.7% | 7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 13.4% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 9.4% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 30.6% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | 4.9% | 133 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 29.3% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 11.3% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 14.8% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 8.8% | 68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 30.8% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | 4.7% | 133 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 26.8% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 9.9% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 17.2% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 9.7% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 31.7% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | 4.7% | 134 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 30.1% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 9.0% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 9.6% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 29.5% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | 4.6% | 135 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 29.5% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 9.5% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 18.8% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 9.6% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 28.0% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | 4.2% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 32.1% | 33 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.3% | 21 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 19.0% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 9.1% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 26.3% | 117 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 4.2% | 162 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 35.7% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 9.1% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 17.0% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 8.5% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 25.5% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 4.1% | 160 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 31.6% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 9.9% | 22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 9.0% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 28.4% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | 4.0% | 161 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 30.5% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.2% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 16.7% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 9.7% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 29.9% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | 3.9% | 161 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 30.3% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 8.6% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 18.9% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 9.5% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 28.8% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 3.4% | 165 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 33.7% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 8.7% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 18.2% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 8.5% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 27.6% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 3.2% | 169 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 33.8% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 7.4% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 21.0% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 9.5% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 25.2% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 3.1% | 169 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 33.5% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 7.4% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 21.8% | 30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 9.4% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 24.8% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -17.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 2.8% | 168 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 32.7% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 7.3% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 22.1% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 8.9% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 26.1% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 2.4% | 171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 30.8% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 8.0% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 22.3% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 9.4% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 27.1% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 2.5% | 167 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 32.1% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 7.4% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 22.0% | 31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 9.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 27.1% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 2.0% | 174 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 37.5% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 6.9% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 20.5% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 8.5% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 24.6% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -19.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 1.8% | 179 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 34.9% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 7.4% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 19.6% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 10.1% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 26.2% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | -18.3 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 2.0% | 174 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 33.4% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 20.2% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 10.0% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 27.5% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 1.3% | 182 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 41.3% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 7.1% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 17.6% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 24.4% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -20.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 1.0% | 188 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 44.3% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +21.8 pp vs world | 7.0% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 16.3% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 6.8% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 24.5% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 0.9% | 186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 47.3% | 14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | 7.4% | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 16.9% | 70 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.0% | 169 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 21.5% | 175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -22.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 0.7% | 189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 49.7% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +26.2 pp vs world | 7.5% | 56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 17.2% | 65 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 3.9% | 194 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 21.0% | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -22.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 0.7% | 188 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 47.7% | 13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | 7.0% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 17.6% | 66 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 5.9% | 174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 21.1% | 179 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 14.0 / 100 | -22.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 0.6% | 193 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 50.1% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +26.1 pp vs world | 8.0% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 18.0% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 4.3% | 193 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 19.0% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -24.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | 0.8% | 187 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 43.9% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 18.5% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 6.2% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 24.7% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -20.4 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 0.7% | 190 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 43.2% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 22.6% | 26 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 5.9% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 21.2% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -22.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | 0.7% | 191 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 45.8% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 5.1% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 24.0% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 19.0% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -24.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 0.6% | 191 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 43.5% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 5.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 25.0% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 5.5% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 20.2% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -23.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 0.7% | 188 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 9.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 41.6% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 5.1% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 26.2% | 15 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 5.3% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 21.1% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -22.2 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 0.7% | 191 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 39.9% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 5.2% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 28.4% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world | 5.1% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 20.8% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -22.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | 1.0% | 184 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 31.8% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 5.9% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 29.9% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 5.6% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 25.8% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -18.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | 1.0% | 182 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 29.9% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 6.0% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 29.6% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 6.2% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 27.3% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | 1.1% | 181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 32.0% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 5.5% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 28.0% | 14 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 6.0% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 27.4% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | 1.0% | 181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 33.8% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 5.6% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 25.8% | 15 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 6.3% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 27.5% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 0.8% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 31.2% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 27.0% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 6.7% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 29.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -15.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | 1.1% | 179 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 27.4% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 5.4% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 28.6% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 6.4% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 31.0% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | 1.0% | 183 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 35.8% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 24.6% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 5.9% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 27.4% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 0.8% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 41.9% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 4.9% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 23.3% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 5.7% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 23.4% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 0.9% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 30.7% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 5.4% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 27.9% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 7.3% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 27.9% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 0.8% | 186 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 31.7% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 4.9% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 28.3% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 7.1% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 27.1% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 15.2% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Trinidad and Tobago was 0.5 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 15.2%
- World specialization
- 0.97×
- Latest year
- 2024
21.9% → 13.3%
Percentage-point change: -8.5 pp13.3% → 18.9%
Percentage-point change: +5.6 pp18.9% → 15.2%
Percentage-point change: -3.7 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1970 | 21.9% | 38 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 63.2% | 126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 78 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1971 | 20.9% | 42 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 63.0% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -20.7 pp vs world | -0.5% | 156 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 81 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1972 | 21.1% | 44 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 62.7% | 129 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world | 4.8% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 78 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1973 | 18.6% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 50.1% | 139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -33.0 pp vs world | -1.7% | 158 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1974 | 16.1% | 77 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 33.8% | 150 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -45.4 pp vs world | 4.2% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 82 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1975 | 14.6% | 83 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 31.6% | 154 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -47.5 pp vs world | -13.0% | 168 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 4.6 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1976 | 13.9% | 90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.1 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 32.0% | 153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -46.8 pp vs world | 18.7% | 19 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1977 | 13.2% | 92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 31.0% | 153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -47.4 pp vs world | -3.0% | 155 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1978 | 12.0% | 95 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 33.1% | 152 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -45.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 88 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1979 | 13.6% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 34.8% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -42.4 pp vs world | 2.7% | 119 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1980 | 8.8% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 20.7% | 163 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.0 / 100 | -53.0 pp vs world | 2.4% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1981 | 5.9% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | 16.7% | 167 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -56.7 pp vs world | -6.6% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1982 | 5.7% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 22.0% | 164 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -52.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1983 | 8.0% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world | 31.6% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -42.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1984 | 8.8% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 29.6% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -45.1 pp vs world | -1.3% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1985 | 8.2% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 28.0% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -47.6 pp vs world | -10.9% | 173 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -15.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1986 | 9.0% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 33.5% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -45.7 pp vs world | 4.9% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1987 | 9.5% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 31.6% | 160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -47.8 pp vs world | -7.4% | 169 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1988 | 11.7% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 39.5% | 156 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -40.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1989 | 11.9% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 37.0% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -42.8 pp vs world | 5.1% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1990 | 13.3% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 37.3% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -41.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1991 | 13.8% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 43.8% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -34.9 pp vs world | 8.4% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1992 | 12.7% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 41.7% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -36.6 pp vs world | 2.6% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1993 | 12.8% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 42.2% | 170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -35.2 pp vs world | -3.0% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1994 | 16.3% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 48.4% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -29.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1995 | 15.7% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 46.6% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -31.4 pp vs world | 4.2% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1996 | 16.0% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 47.8% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -28.7 pp vs world | 9.3% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1997 | 15.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 45.9% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -30.1 pp vs world | 4.5% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1998 | 14.2% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 46.2% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -30.6 pp vs world | 13.9% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1999 | 13.7% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 42.8% | 170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -33.1 pp vs world | 17.4% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2000 | 16.1% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 43.1% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -30.8 pp vs world | 13.9% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2001 | 15.2% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 43.6% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -29.1 pp vs world | 1.0% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2002 | 15.2% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 45.5% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -26.6 pp vs world | 12.5% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2003 | 17.7% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 42.7% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -28.8 pp vs world | 32.2% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +28.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2004 | 20.3% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 45.8% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -30.7 pp vs world | 8.4% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2005 | 21.1% | 33 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 44.6% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -29.3 pp vs world | 11.0% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2006 | 19.9% | 38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 40.1% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -32.4 pp vs world | 26.1% | 9 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2007 | 19.6% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 41.0% | 166 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -31.5 pp vs world | 4.2% | 110 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2008 | 18.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 36.6% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -33.3 pp vs world | 5.4% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2009 | 16.5% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 37.5% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -35.1 pp vs world | -5.6% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2010 | 18.9% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 43.8% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -27.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2011 | 20.5% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 44.7% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -24.6 pp vs world | -2.9% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2012 | 18.1% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 41.7% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -27.8 pp vs world | -2.8% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2013 | 14.5% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 34.8% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -35.1 pp vs world | -0.0% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2014 | 14.9% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 37.4% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -34.3 pp vs world | -2.2% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2015 | 14.8% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 46.7% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -29.6 pp vs world | 1.8% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2016 | 18.0% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 60.1% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -17.2 pp vs world | -3.3% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2017 | 16.8% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 52.7% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -23.4 pp vs world | -2.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2018 | 17.6% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 52.1% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -22.9 pp vs world | -0.9% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2019 | 15.2% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 48.8% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -26.7 pp vs world | -2.8% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2020 | 15.9% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 58.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world | -11.8% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2021 | 18.2% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 50.8% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -24.6 pp vs world | -0.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2022 | 18.0% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 42.9% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -29.0 pp vs world | 4.8% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2023 | 14.7% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 47.8% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -25.6 pp vs world | -4.8% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 2024 | 15.2% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 48.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -26.1 pp vs world | 7.6% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization