Source-specific country analysis
Republic of Moldova Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table35 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | $4.77B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $1,071 | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | 24.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | $4.07B | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -17.5% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world | $912 | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | 20.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | $2.95B | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -29.0% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -31.1 pp vs world | $662 | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 14.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | $2.98B | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.2% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | $671 | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 14.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | $2.11B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -30.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -34.2 pp vs world | $475 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | $2.12B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.4% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | $480 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 8.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | $2.03B | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -5.9% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | $463 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | $2.31B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.6% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $531 | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | $2.04B | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -6.5% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | $472 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 9.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | $1.41B | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.4% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | $329 | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | 6.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | $1.55B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.1% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | $365 | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | $1.78B | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.1% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | $424 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | $1.99B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.8% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | $482 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | $2.38B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | $580 | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | $3.12B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.4% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $771 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | $3.59B | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.5% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $899 | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | 12.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | $4.09B | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $1,043 | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | 13.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | $5.28B | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | $1,371 | 156 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | 15.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | $7.27B | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.8% | 31 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.5 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | $1,923 | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | 20.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | $6.53B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -6.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | $1,761 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 20.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | $6.97B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.1% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | $1,920 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 20.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | $8.41B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.8% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | $2,365 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 22.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | $8.71B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.6% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | $2,501 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 23.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | $9.50B | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.0% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | $2,786 | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | 25.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | $9.40B | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $2,813 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 25.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | $7.80B | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.7% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | $2,372 | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 23.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | $7.98B | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $2,465 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 24.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | $9.51B | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $2,979 | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 27.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | $11.25B | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $3,568 | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 31.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | $11.74B | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $3,771 | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | 33.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | $11.53B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.3% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | $3,757 | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 34.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | $13.69B | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 13.9% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | $4,528 | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | 36.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | $14.53B | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.6% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | $4,778 | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | 37.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | $16.71B | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.2% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $5,449 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | 41.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | $18.20B | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | $5,997 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | 43.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$4.77B → $4.77B
Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR$4.77B → $6.97B
Compound annual change: +1.9% CAGR$6.97B → $18.20B
Compound annual change: +7.1% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | $4.77B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $15.59B | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | $4.07B | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.86B | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | $2.95B | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.13B | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | $2.98B | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.02B | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | $2.11B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.23B | 123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | $2.12B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.15B | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | $2.03B | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.78B | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | $2.31B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.88B | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | $2.04B | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.49B | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | $1.41B | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.31B | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | $1.55B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.42B | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | $1.78B | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.75B | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | $1.99B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.20B | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | $2.38B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.62B | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | $3.12B | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.10B | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | $3.59B | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $7.63B | 135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | $4.09B | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.00B | 136 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | $5.28B | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.24B | 137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | $7.27B | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.89B | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | $6.53B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.35B | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | $6.97B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.95B | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | $8.41B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.47B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | $8.71B | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.41B | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | $9.50B | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.26B | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | $9.40B | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.78B | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | $7.80B | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.70B | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | $7.98B | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.20B | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | $9.51B | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.66B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | $11.25B | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.14B | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | $11.74B | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.57B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | $11.53B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.53B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | $13.69B | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $13.14B | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | $14.53B | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.53B | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | $16.71B | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.68B | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | $18.20B | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.69B | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$1,071 → $1,071
Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR$1,071 → $1,920
Compound annual change: +3.0% CAGR$1,920 → $5,997
Compound annual change: +8.5% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | $1,071 | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | 24.7 (world = 100) | $3,502 | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | 48.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | $912 | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | 20.4 (world = 100) | $2,886 | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | 40.5 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | $662 | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 14.0 (world = 100) | $2,048 | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | 28.6 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | $671 | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 14.2 (world = 100) | $2,028 | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | 28.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | $475 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | $1,405 | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 19.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | $480 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 8.8 (world = 100) | $1,392 | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 18.8 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | $463 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) | $1,318 | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 17.4 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | $531 | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | $1,350 | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 17.4 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | $472 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 9.0 (world = 100) | $1,272 | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 16.2 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | $329 | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | 6.1 (world = 100) | $1,241 | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 15.5 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | $365 | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) | $1,280 | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | 15.5 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | $424 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | $1,374 | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | 16.5 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | $482 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) | $1,498 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 17.8 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | $580 | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | $1,615 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 18.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | $771 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | $1,755 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 19.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | $899 | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | 12.3 (world = 100) | $1,914 | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 21.2 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | $1,043 | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | 13.4 (world = 100) | $2,040 | 151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | 21.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | $1,371 | 156 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | 15.8 (world = 100) | $2,140 | 151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | 22.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | $1,923 | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | 20.4 (world = 100) | $2,351 | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 24.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | $1,761 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 20.0 (world = 100) | $2,254 | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | 23.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | $1,920 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 20.1 (world = 100) | $2,463 | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 25.4 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | $2,365 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 22.6 (world = 100) | $2,661 | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | 26.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | $2,501 | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 23.7 (world = 100) | $2,702 | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 26.9 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | $2,786 | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | 25.9 (world = 100) | $3,011 | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | 29.5 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | $2,813 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 25.8 (world = 100) | $3,224 | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 31.0 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | $2,372 | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 23.3 (world = 100) | $3,255 | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | 30.7 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | $2,465 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 24.1 (world = 100) | $3,458 | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 32.2 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | $2,979 | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | 27.7 (world = 100) | $3,653 | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | 33.2 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | $3,568 | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | 31.6 (world = 100) | $3,849 | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | 34.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | $3,771 | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | 33.2 (world = 100) | $4,039 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | 35.4 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | $3,757 | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 34.3 (world = 100) | $3,757 | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 34.3 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | $4,528 | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | 36.5 (world = 100) | $4,345 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | 37.6 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | $4,778 | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | 37.3 (world = 100) | $4,121 | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | 34.8 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | $5,449 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | 41.1 (world = 100) | $4,133 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | 34.2 (world = 100) |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | $5,997 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | 43.9 (world = 100) | $4,181 | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | 33.9 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable-17.5% → 7.1%
Average annual rate: -2.0%7.1% → 0.1%
Average annual rate: +3.0%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0 | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | -17.5% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world | -17.6% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -17.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | -29.0% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -31.1 pp vs world | -29.0% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -29.5 pp vs world | 0.1 | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | -1.2% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | -1.0% | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 1.4 | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | -30.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -34.2 pp vs world | -30.7% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -32.5 pp vs world | 5.3 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | -1.4% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -0.9% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 7.3 | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | -5.9% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | -5.3% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 9.3 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 1.6% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 2.4% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 10.5 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | -6.5% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | -5.7% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 11.5 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | -3.4% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | -2.5% | 178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 16.1 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 2.1% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 20.5 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 6.1% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 7.3% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 22.9 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 7.8% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 9.0% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 25.2 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 6.6% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 7.9% | 22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 28.9 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 7.4% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 8.7% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 31.2 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 7.5% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 9.1% | 20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 34.2 | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 4.8% | 124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 6.6% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 38.8 | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 3.0% | 163 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 4.9% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 44.9 | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 7.8% | 31 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.5 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 9.9% | 6 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 49.1 | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | -6.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | -4.1% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 50.1 | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 7.1% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 9.3% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 55.7 | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 5.8% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 8.0% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 60.2 | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | -0.6% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 1.5% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 64.7 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 9.0% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 11.4% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 67.2 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 5.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 7.1% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 70.7 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | -0.7% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 1.0% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 79.2 | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 4.6% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 6.2% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 82.0 | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 4.2% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 5.6% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 87.1 | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 4.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 89.9 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 3.6% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 4.9% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 94.7 | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | -8.3% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | -7.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 13.9% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 15.6% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 106.4 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | -4.6% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | -5.2% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 126.5 | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 1.2% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.3% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 138.3 | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 0.1% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 147.3 | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
65.3% → 65.3%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp65.3% → 110.1%
Percentage-point change: +44.7 pp110.1% → 104.7%
Percentage-point change: -5.3 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | 65.3% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 57.2% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 8.2% | 187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 93.9% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | 67.6% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 53.1% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 14.5% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 97.1% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | 52.8% | 200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -22.5 pp vs world | 39.6% | 196 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world | 13.1% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 113.4% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | 51.7% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -23.8 pp vs world | 39.0% | 196 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world | 12.8% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 108.3% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | 69.6% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 51.1% | 170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 18.5% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 98.8% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | 76.2% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 54.9% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 21.3% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 101.4% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | 87.2% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 65.9% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 21.3% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 111.8% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 89.7% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 66.1% | 96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 23.7% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 113.9% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | 93.8% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +18.2 pp vs world | 73.5% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 20.3% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 120.0% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +20.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | 84.7% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 72.1% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 12.6% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 107.9% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 97.3% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | 85.2% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world | 12.0% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 121.6% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 95.5% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 83.7% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +23.5 pp vs world | 11.8% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 119.1% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 96.7% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 80.1% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 16.6% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 118.6% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 103.5% | 22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | 87.3% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +27.5 pp vs world | 16.2% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 127.0% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 98.1% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | 85.8% | 21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | 12.2% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 124.8% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 103.6% | 25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.4 / 100 | +28.2 pp vs world | 90.1% | 21 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | 13.5% | 126 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 134.8% | 18 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +35.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 106.9% | 23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +32.4 pp vs world | 90.5% | 19 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +32.5 pp vs world | 16.4% | 83 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 140.1% | 14 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +40.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 106.5% | 18 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | 90.1% | 17 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | 16.4% | 87 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 145.2% | 12 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +45.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 106.6% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | 89.8% | 17 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +32.7 pp vs world | 16.8% | 84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 146.4% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +47.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | 106.0% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +29.9 pp vs world | 86.5% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 129.5% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +30.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 110.1% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +35.5 pp vs world | 90.2% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +33.1 pp vs world | 18.2% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 133.9% | 17 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +34.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 111.1% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +37.3 pp vs world | 92.9% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +36.4 pp vs world | 16.6% | 97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 135.2% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +36.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | 111.5% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +37.8 pp vs world | 93.2% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world | 16.7% | 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 135.7% | 17 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 108.2% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +34.6 pp vs world | 91.3% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +34.7 pp vs world | 15.3% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 133.1% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +34.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 107.4% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +33.9 pp vs world | 93.5% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +36.8 pp vs world | 13.9% | 144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 131.2% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +31.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | 101.3% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +27.6 pp vs world | 87.6% | 20 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world | 13.7% | 147 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 125.4% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 101.3% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 86.9% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +29.7 pp vs world | 14.4% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 123.3% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +24.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 101.6% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +28.3 pp vs world | 86.9% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +30.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 123.6% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 99.5% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 85.2% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +28.8 pp vs world | 14.3% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 126.1% | 23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 100.1% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world | 84.9% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | 15.2% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 125.3% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +25.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | 99.6% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 82.4% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world | 17.2% | 113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 123.4% | 32 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 100.3% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | 83.6% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +28.6 pp vs world | 16.8% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 127.2% | 31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +28.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | 102.4% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +30.4 pp vs world | 84.8% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +29.3 pp vs world | 17.5% | 93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 129.7% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 103.7% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +30.7 pp vs world | 85.8% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +29.3 pp vs world | 17.9% | 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 123.8% | 31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 104.7% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +31.5 pp vs world | 86.8% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world | 17.9% | 90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 125.8% | 26 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
28.6% → 28.6%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp28.6% → 23.9%
Percentage-point change: -4.8 pp23.9% → 21.1%
Percentage-point change: -2.7 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | 28.6% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 21.9% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 6.7% | 16 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | 29.5% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 17.0% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 12.5% | 6 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | 60.6% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +35.9 pp vs world | 16.1% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 44.5% | 1 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +43.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | 56.6% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +32.4 pp vs world | 15.4% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 41.1% | 1 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +40.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | 29.2% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 19.2% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 10.0% | 6 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 97.0 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | 25.2% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 15.9% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 9.3% | 4 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 98.2 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | 24.6% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 4.9% | 19 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 24.1% | 88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 19.8% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 4.3% | 19 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | 26.2% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 22.0% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 4.3% | 16 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | 23.2% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 18.4% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 4.8% | 11 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 94.0 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 24.3% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 15.4% | 166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 8.9% | 3 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 98.8 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 23.6% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 16.7% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 6.9% | 6 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 22.0% | 104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 16.3% | 166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 5.7% | 8 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 23.5% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 18.5% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 5.0% | 12 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 26.7% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 21.1% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 5.6% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 31.3% | 32 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 24.5% | 73 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 6.8% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 33.2% | 34 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 28.2% | 44 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 5.0% | 13 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 38.6% | 19 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 34.0% | 24 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 4.7% | 20 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 39.8% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 33.8% | 26 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 5.9% | 14 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | 23.5% | 90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 22.5% | 108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 1.0% | 56 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 23.9% | 93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 22.5% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 1.3% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 24.0% | 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 23.2% | 93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 90 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | 24.2% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 23.6% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 0.6% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 24.9% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 23.0% | 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 1.9% | 35 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 23.8% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 26.0% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | -2.2% | 172 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | 24.1% | 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 24.0% | 83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 22.0% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 22.2% | 105 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 146 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 21.9% | 118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 22.4% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.5% | 164 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 26.6% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 23.3% | 88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 26 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 25.1% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 23.4% | 86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 1.7% | 44 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | 23.9% | 84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 24.9% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | -1.1% | 149 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 14.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 26.9% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 24.1% | 75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 39 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | 27.3% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 22.1% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 5.2% | 22 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 20.1% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 19.4% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 0.6% | 68 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 21.1% | 124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 20.0% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 1.1% | 49 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 70.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Republic of Moldova is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
70.1% → 70.1%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp70.1% → 87.9%
Percentage-point change: +17.8 pp87.9% → 88.7%
Percentage-point change: +0.7 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | 33.0% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 37.2% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | -4.2% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 70.1% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +32.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | 22.9% | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 26.1% | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | -3.2% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 49.0% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | 27.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 42.0% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | -15.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world | 69.1% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +29.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | 28.1% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 39.3% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | -11.2% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 67.3% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | 40.0% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 46.4% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +27.5 pp vs world | -6.4% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 86.5% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +48.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | 42.7% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 52.0% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +31.8 pp vs world | -9.3% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 94.6% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +53.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | 39.3% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +18.1 pp vs world | 56.6% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +35.9 pp vs world | -17.3% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -17.7 pp vs world | 95.8% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +54.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 37.7% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 56.9% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +35.4 pp vs world | -19.2% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -19.7 pp vs world | 94.7% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +51.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | 31.9% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 54.9% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +33.5 pp vs world | -23.0% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -23.3 pp vs world | 86.9% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | 37.1% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 49.9% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +28.3 pp vs world | -12.8% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 87.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 35.2% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 58.6% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +35.2 pp vs world | -23.4% | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -23.5 pp vs world | 93.8% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +46.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 35.5% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 57.0% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +34.0 pp vs world | -21.5% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -21.4 pp vs world | 92.5% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +46.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 37.2% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 59.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +36.2 pp vs world | -22.0% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -22.2 pp vs world | 96.4% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +50.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 37.8% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 66.4% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +42.6 pp vs world | -28.6% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -28.7 pp vs world | 104.2% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +56.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 36.3% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 62.4% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +36.9 pp vs world | -26.1% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -26.4 pp vs world | 98.7% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +47.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 36.3% | 102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 70.3% | 32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +43.7 pp vs world | -34.0% | 191 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -34.4 pp vs world | 106.6% | 59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | +52.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 32.1% | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 70.3% | 37 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.6 / 100 | +42.3 pp vs world | -38.2% | 194 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -38.9 pp vs world | 102.4% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +45.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 32.3% | 120 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.5 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 74.3% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world | -42.0% | 195 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -42.7 pp vs world | 106.7% | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | +48.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 29.0% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 71.6% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +41.4 pp vs world | -42.7% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -43.4 pp vs world | 100.6% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +39.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | 26.2% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 56.2% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | -30.1% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -30.7 pp vs world | 82.4% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 27.8% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 60.1% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +32.5 pp vs world | -32.3% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -33.2 pp vs world | 87.9% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +31.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 32.5% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 66.1% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world | -33.5% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -34.4 pp vs world | 98.6% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | 31.1% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 65.2% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +36.0 pp vs world | -34.0% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -35.0 pp vs world | 96.3% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +37.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 32.1% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 63.6% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +34.5 pp vs world | -31.5% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -32.5 pp vs world | 95.7% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +36.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 31.5% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 62.7% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +33.8 pp vs world | -31.2% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -32.0 pp vs world | 94.2% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | 31.8% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 57.2% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +29.6 pp vs world | -25.4% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -26.0 pp vs world | 89.0% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +33.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 32.9% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 56.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +29.7 pp vs world | -23.3% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -24.1 pp vs world | 89.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +35.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 32.5% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 56.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | -23.6% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -24.3 pp vs world | 88.6% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +33.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 30.7% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 56.8% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | -26.1% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -26.9 pp vs world | 87.4% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +30.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 31.2% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 56.4% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +28.9 pp vs world | -25.3% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -25.9 pp vs world | 87.6% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +32.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | 27.9% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 51.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +26.0 pp vs world | -23.4% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -24.1 pp vs world | 79.3% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +27.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 30.6% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 57.8% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world | -27.2% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -28.2 pp vs world | 88.5% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +32.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | 41.2% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 70.9% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +40.8 pp vs world | -29.7% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -30.5 pp vs world | 112.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +51.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 35.1% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 58.9% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | -23.8% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -24.5 pp vs world | 94.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 31.4% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 57.3% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world | -25.8% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -26.7 pp vs world | 88.7% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +31.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 29.1%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 2.24×
World specialization: 0.63×
World specialization: 1.40×
World specialization: 1.71×
World specialization: 1.57×
World specialization: 0.65×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
13.6% → 13.6%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp13.6% → 36.4%
Percentage-point change: +22.8 pp36.4% → 29.1%
Percentage-point change: -7.3 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table35 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | 33.0% | 28 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 86.7 / 100 | +27.8 pp vs world | 29.8% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 13.2% | 9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 5.0% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 13.6% | 198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -25.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | 31.5% | 34 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 25.1% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 10.8% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 6.9% | 189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 4.4% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 21.4% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -18.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | 34.8% | 29 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 86.2 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world | 29.7% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 9.6% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 6.7% | 190 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 4.1% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 15.1% | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -25.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | 28.1% | 42 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 37.7% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 6.4% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 8.8% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 3.4% | 193 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 15.7% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -26.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | 25.9% | 46 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world | 31.6% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 9.1% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 9.0% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 5.1% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 19.4% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -21.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | 30.2% | 35 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +26.3 pp vs world | 27.4% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 7.8% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 9.5% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 4.5% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 20.6% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -21.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | 27.5% | 43 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.3 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 24.5% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 8.2% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 9.5% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 4.8% | 172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 25.5% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 26.6% | 45 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 22.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 10.3% | 12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 9.5% | 180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 5.6% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 25.9% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | 26.7% | 45 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 18.8% | 123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 7.0% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 12.0% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 6.5% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 29.1% | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | 23.8% | 51 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 18.1% | 123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 6.8% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 16.1% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 28.5% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 26.4% | 34 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 18.2% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 6.0% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 14.3% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 8.4% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 26.7% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 23.1% | 49 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 20.9% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 6.7% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 13.9% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 9.1% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 26.3% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -18.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 22.0% | 51 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 19.5% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 6.6% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 13.0% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 8.9% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 29.9% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 19.6% | 55 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 20.2% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 13.1% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 9.9% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 30.6% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -14.5 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 18.5% | 56 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 19.3% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 7.7% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 12.7% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 10.6% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 31.3% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -13.1 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 17.7% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world | 18.3% | 121 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 7.7% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 12.9% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 11.3% | 51 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 32.2% | 116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 15.5% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 16.9% | 131 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 37.2 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 9.1% | 30 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 14.0% | 126 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 10.9% | 50 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 76.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 33.7% | 108 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 10.6% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 16.6% | 135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 10.9% | 17 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 15.2% | 106 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 45 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 35.6% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 9.4% | 91 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 16.1% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 15.9% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 11.0% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 36.4% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | 9.1% | 94 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 15.7% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 7.9% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 16.2% | 87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 11.1% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 40.0% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 13.0% | 68 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 15.9% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 7.8% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 15.8% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 11.0% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 36.4% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 13.3% | 68 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 16.7% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 7.6% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 16.8% | 80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 11.3% | 37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 34.3% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | 12.1% | 71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 16.8% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 7.9% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 17.1% | 76 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 11.3% | 36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 34.8% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 13.4% | 67 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 17.3% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 7.8% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 17.1% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 10.8% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 33.5% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 16.2% | 57 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 72.8 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 15.3% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 9.0% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 17.4% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 9.8% | 80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 32.2% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | 14.7% | 60 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 15.6% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 8.5% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 17.8% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 10.8% | 57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 32.5% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 14.3% | 59 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 15.6% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 8.7% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 18.6% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 10.8% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 32.1% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 14.1% | 59 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 15.7% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 8.6% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 19.0% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 10.9% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 31.6% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 11.8% | 72 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 15.7% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 10.0% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 10.5% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 32.4% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 11.7% | 72 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 15.2% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 10.1% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 19.4% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 10.7% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 33.0% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | 10.8% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 15.2% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 11.5% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 18.2% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 9.7% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 34.6% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 12.3% | 70 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 14.7% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 9.3% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 19.0% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 10.9% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 33.8% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | 9.4% | 85 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 59.2 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 13.3% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 8.8% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 20.8% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 13.0% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 34.6% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 8.2% | 93 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 12.2% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 8.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 20.5% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 13.5% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 37.2% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 9.5% | 80 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 13.2% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 8.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 24.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 15.3% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 29.1% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 10.3% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Republic of Moldova was 5.3 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 10.3%
- World specialization
- 0.66×
- Latest year
- 2024
25.8% → 25.8%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp25.8% → 11.6%
Percentage-point change: -14.3 pp11.6% → 10.3%
Percentage-point change: -1.2 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table35 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Republic of Moldova | 1990 | 25.8% | 30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 86.6% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1991 | 21.9% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 87.2% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | -32.8% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -32.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1992 | 26.0% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 87.5% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | -13.8% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1993 | 32.1% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 85.1% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 42.9% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1994 | 28.0% | 12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 88.8% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | -48.7% | 204 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -52.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1995 | 24.3% | 21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 88.6% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | -6.0% | 184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1996 | 21.7% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 88.6% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | -1.7% | 168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1997 | 19.4% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 88.2% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | -13.2% | 195 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -17.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1998 | 14.9% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 79.6% | 79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | -16.4% | 201 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -17.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 1999 | 12.9% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 71.4% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -6.1% | 186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2000 | 15.3% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 83.8% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 15.9% | 31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2001 | 16.8% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 80.1% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 5.5% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2002 | 16.1% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 82.3% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 2.9% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2003 | 17.1% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 84.7% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 17.8% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2004 | 15.7% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 81.6% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 7.8% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2005 | 14.9% | 80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 81.3% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 2.5% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 138 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2006 | 13.8% | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 81.9% | 59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | -4.4% | 192 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 141 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2007 | 12.9% | 102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 77.8% | 76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | -1.2% | 170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 141 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2008 | 12.4% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 76.6% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 119 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2009 | 11.7% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 74.1% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | -21.8% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2010 | 11.6% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 72.5% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 11.0% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2011 | 12.3% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 73.5% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 12.7% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2012 | 12.4% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 73.7% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2013 | 13.0% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 75.1% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.1% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2014 | 11.6% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 75.8% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 8.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2015 | 11.5% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 73.4% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 3.3% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2016 | 11.5% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 73.7% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 3.4% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2017 | 11.5% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 73.6% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 5.9% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2018 | 11.7% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 74.3% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 7.6% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2019 | 11.4% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 75.2% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 6.5% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2020 | 11.7% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 76.9% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | -4.4% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2021 | 11.2% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 76.2% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 1.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2022 | 10.7% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 80.6% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | -4.1% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2023 | 9.7% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 79.1% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | -10.8% | 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -12.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Republic of Moldova | 2024 | 10.3% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 78.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 1.2% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization