Source-specific country analysis
Pakistan Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | $13.14B | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $218 | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | 23.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | $13.98B | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 1.6% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | $226 | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | 22.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | $8.25B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | $130 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | $8.85B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $135 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | $11.66B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.3% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | $173 | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | $14.72B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $212 | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | 12.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | $17.25B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $241 | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 13.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | $19.82B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | $268 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 13.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | $23.34B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | $306 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | 13.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | $25.80B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $327 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 12.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | $30.99B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.7% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | $377 | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 13.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | $36.82B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.9% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | $429 | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 15.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | $35.85B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | $402 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | 14.7 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | $36.40B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.8% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | $395 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 14.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | $39.16B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $412 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 14.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | $38.84B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 7.6% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | $395 | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 14.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | $40.50B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | $399 | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 12.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | $43.11B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 6.5% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | $410 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | $49.16B | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.6% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | $452 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | 11.7 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | $49.10B | 39 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $437 | 153 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | $51.67B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.5% | 69 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $445 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | $55.97B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | $466 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | $62.96B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.7% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | $510 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 10.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | $62.13B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | $489 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | $66.92B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $512 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | $77.27B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $574 | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | $80.49B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 9.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | $581 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | $84.57B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $593 | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | $88.97B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 7.2% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | $607 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | $92.87B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 8.4% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | $617 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | $95.94B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 9.0% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | $619 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | $91.33B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $573 | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | $100.97B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $619 | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | 11.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | $113.96B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $682 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | $130.65B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 7.8% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | $763 | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | 11.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | $144.83B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 7.3% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | $825 | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | $160.76B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.1% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $895 | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | $183.82B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $996 | 169 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | $179.63B | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.1% | 142 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $948 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | $179.97B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.5% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | $926 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 10.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | $193.76B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | $972 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | $228.52B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $1,122 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | $239.25B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $1,152 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | $246.41B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $1,167 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | $276.49B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $1,290 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | $296.06B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $1,363 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 13.4 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | $312.35B | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | $1,419 | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 13.9 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | $337.14B | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $1,510 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 14.0 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | $321.69B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $1,418 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 12.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | $291.92B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | $1,265 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | $293.75B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -1.3% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $1,250 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | $342.75B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.5% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $1,431 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | $325.37B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $1,335 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | $299.44B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -0.0% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $1,210 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | $379.12B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $1,509 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$13.14B → $51.67B
Compound annual change: +7.1% CAGR$51.67B → $193.76B
Compound annual change: +6.8% CAGR$193.76B → $379.12B
Compound annual change: +4.9% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | $13.14B | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $24.95B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | $13.98B | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $25.33B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | $8.25B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $25.70B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | $8.85B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $27.39B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | $11.66B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $28.84B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | $14.72B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $29.77B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | $17.25B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $31.15B | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | $19.82B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $32.33B | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | $23.34B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $34.92B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | $25.80B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $36.59B | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | $30.99B | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $39.78B | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | $36.82B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $42.53B | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | $35.85B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $45.31B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | $36.40B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $48.39B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | $39.16B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $50.84B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | $38.84B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $54.70B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | $40.50B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $57.70B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | $43.11B | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $61.43B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | $49.16B | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $66.11B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | $49.10B | 39 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $69.39B | 48 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | $51.67B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $72.49B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | $55.97B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $76.15B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | $62.96B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $82.02B | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | $62.13B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $83.46B | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | $66.92B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $86.58B | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | $77.27B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $90.88B | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | $80.49B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $99.60B | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | $84.57B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $105.18B | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | $88.97B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $112.75B | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | $92.87B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $122.17B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | $95.94B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $133.15B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | $91.33B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $138.01B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | $100.97B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $141.59B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | $113.96B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $149.24B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | $130.65B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $160.93B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | $144.83B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $172.64B | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | $160.76B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $183.09B | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | $183.82B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $191.23B | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | $179.63B | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $195.28B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | $179.97B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $202.06B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | $193.76B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $205.10B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | $228.52B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $210.59B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | $239.25B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $216.97B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | $246.41B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $226.44B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | $276.49B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $235.77B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | $296.06B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $245.71B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | $312.35B | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $261.86B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | $337.14B | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $273.47B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | $321.69B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $290.29B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | $291.92B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $297.54B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | $293.75B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $293.75B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | $342.75B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $312.89B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | $325.37B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $327.84B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | $299.44B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $327.71B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | $379.12B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $338.31B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
Asia$40.60T2024
Southern Asia$5.38T2024
World$111.57T2024
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$218 → $445
Compound annual change: +3.6% CAGR$445 → $972
Compound annual change: +4.0% CAGR$972 → $1,509
Compound annual change: +3.2% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | $218 | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | 23.5 (world = 100) | $415 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1971 | $226 | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | 22.6 (world = 100) | $410 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 7.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1972 | $130 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $404 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 7.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1973 | $135 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | $418 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1974 | $173 | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $428 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1975 | $212 | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | 12.9 (world = 100) | $429 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 7.6 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1976 | $241 | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 13.8 (world = 100) | $435 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 7.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1977 | $268 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 13.9 (world = 100) | $437 | 165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1978 | $306 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | 13.6 (world = 100) | $458 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 7.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1979 | $327 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 12.8 (world = 100) | $463 | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | 7.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1980 | $377 | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 13.5 (world = 100) | $483 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | 7.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1981 | $429 | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 15.3 (world = 100) | $496 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1982 | $402 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | 14.7 (world = 100) | $509 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | 8.2 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1983 | $395 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 14.4 (world = 100) | $525 | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1984 | $412 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 14.8 (world = 100) | $534 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1985 | $395 | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 14.1 (world = 100) | $557 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1986 | $399 | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 12.6 (world = 100) | $568 | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1987 | $410 | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.6 (world = 100) | $584 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | 8.6 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1988 | $452 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | 11.7 (world = 100) | $608 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | 8.8 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1989 | $437 | 153 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | $618 | 157 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1990 | $445 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | $624 | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1991 | $466 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | $634 | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1992 | $510 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 10.8 (world = 100) | $664 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 9.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1993 | $489 | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | $657 | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | 9.2 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1994 | $512 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) | $662 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1995 | $574 | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | $675 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1996 | $581 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | $719 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1997 | $593 | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | $738 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1998 | $607 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $769 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 9.8 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 1999 | $617 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) | $811 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 10.1 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2000 | $619 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | $860 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2001 | $573 | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | $867 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2002 | $619 | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | 11.2 (world = 100) | $867 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2003 | $682 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) | $893 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2004 | $763 | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | 11.2 (world = 100) | $940 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2005 | $825 | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) | $984 | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2006 | $895 | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $1,019 | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2007 | $996 | 169 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $1,036 | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 10.8 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2008 | $948 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.1 (world = 100) | $1,031 | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2009 | $926 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 10.5 (world = 100) | $1,040 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2010 | $972 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.2 (world = 100) | $1,029 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2011 | $1,122 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) | $1,034 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2012 | $1,152 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) | $1,045 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2013 | $1,167 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) | $1,073 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.5 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2014 | $1,290 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.8 (world = 100) | $1,100 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2015 | $1,363 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 13.4 (world = 100) | $1,131 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2016 | $1,419 | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 13.9 (world = 100) | $1,190 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2017 | $1,510 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 14.0 (world = 100) | $1,225 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2018 | $1,418 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 12.5 (world = 100) | $1,279 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2019 | $1,265 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 11.1 (world = 100) | $1,289 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2020 | $1,250 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) | $1,250 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2021 | $1,431 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $1,307 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.3 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2022 | $1,335 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | $1,345 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 11.4 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2023 | $1,210 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | $1,324 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) |
| Pakistan | 2024 | $1,509 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | $1,346 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 10.9 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
Asia$8,4482024
Southern Asia$2,6082024
World$13,6732024
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
1.6% → 4.5%
Average annual rate: +5.5%4.5% → 1.5%
Average annual rate: +5.3%1.5% → 3.2%
Average annual rate: +3.5%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 1.5 | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 1.6% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -1.2% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 1.6 | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 1.5% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | -1.3% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 1.7 | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 6.6% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 3.5% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 2.0 | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 5.3% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 2.3% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 2.5 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 3.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 3.0 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 4.6% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 1.5% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 3.4 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 3.8% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.6% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 3.8 | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 8.0% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 4.6% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 4.1 | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 4.8% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 1.2% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 4.3 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 8.7% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 4.3% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 4.8 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 6.9% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 2.6% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 5.3 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 6.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 2.6% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 5.8 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 6.8% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 3.1% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 6.1 | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 5.1% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 1.8% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 6.7 | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 7.6% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 7.0 | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 5.5% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 2.0% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 7.2 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 6.5% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 2.9% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 7.5 | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 7.6% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 4.1% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 8.3 | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 5.0% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 1.6% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 9.0 | 125 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 4.5% | 69 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 1.0% | 95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 9.6 | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 5.1% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 1.6% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 10.8 | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 7.7% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 4.7% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 11.9 | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 1.8% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | -1.0% | 133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 12.9 | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 3.7% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.8% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 14.6 | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 5.0% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 2.0% | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 16.6 | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 9.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 6.5% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 18.0 | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 5.6% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 2.6% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 20.4 | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 7.2% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 4.3% | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 22.0 | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 8.4% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 23.3 | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 9.0% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 23.9 | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 3.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.8% | 131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 25.3 | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 2.6% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 26.3 | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 5.4% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 2.9% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 27.2 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 7.8% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 5.2% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 29.2 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 7.3% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 4.7% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 30.8 | 180 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 6.1% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 3.6% | 114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 32.7 | 182 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 4.4% | 129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 1.7% | 152 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 36.1 | 181 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 2.1% | 142 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | -0.6% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 40.0 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 3.5% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 45.0 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 1.5% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | -1.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 49.7 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 2.7% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 57.9 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 3.0% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 1.1% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 63.6 | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 4.4% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 2.7% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 68.3 | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 4.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 2.6% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 73.3 | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 4.2% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 2.8% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 76.5 | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 6.6% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 5.2% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 77.2 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 4.4% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 3.0% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 80.3 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 6.2% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 4.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 83.4 | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 2.5% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 91.0 | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2020 | -1.3% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | -3.0% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 6.5% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 4.5% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 110.3 | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 4.8% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 3.0% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 125.6 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2023 | -0.0% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -1.6% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 158.3 | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 3.2% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 192.9 | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
Asia3.9%2024
Southern Asia5.8%2024
World2.8%2024
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
88.1% → 86.1%
Percentage-point change: -1.9 pp86.1% → 90.8%
Percentage-point change: +4.6 pp90.8% → 93.7%
Percentage-point change: +3.0 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | 88.1% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 80.5% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +23.5 pp vs world | 7.6% | 160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 102.9% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 88.3% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 80.5% | 30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.5 / 100 | +23.5 pp vs world | 7.7% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 102.9% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 88.1% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | 79.2% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +22.4 pp vs world | 8.8% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 101.2% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 87.4% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 78.8% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 8.5% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 99.4% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 91.9% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 84.7% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +29.0 pp vs world | 7.2% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 104.3% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 93.8% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 85.8% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world | 8.0% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 109.2% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 91.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 83.0% | 21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.6 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | 8.2% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 107.6% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 91.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 82.8% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 8.3% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 108.4% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 93.2% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 85.1% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world | 8.1% | 163 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 109.2% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 95.0% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +22.4 pp vs world | 87.2% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | 7.8% | 160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 111.1% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 94.5% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world | 87.0% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world | 7.5% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 111.1% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 92.0% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 84.4% | 26 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +27.8 pp vs world | 7.6% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 109.6% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 93.0% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 85.2% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world | 7.7% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 111.1% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 92.5% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 84.0% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +26.1 pp vs world | 8.5% | 160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 110.1% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 93.1% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 84.1% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 9.0% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 110.2% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 94.6% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 85.5% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 9.0% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 111.8% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 89.5% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 79.9% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | 9.5% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 107.1% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 86.2% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 76.1% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 10.1% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 104.2% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 87.1% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 75.5% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | 11.6% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 104.0% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 86.5% | 59 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 74.0% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world | 12.5% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 104.3% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 86.1% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 74.8% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +16.7 pp vs world | 11.3% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 103.9% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 82.2% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 71.5% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 10.7% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 100.1% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 83.0% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 73.4% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 9.6% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 102.0% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 85.5% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 75.7% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 9.8% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 105.0% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 83.6% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 74.5% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 9.0% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 101.9% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 84.7% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 75.9% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 8.8% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 102.1% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 85.5% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 75.7% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 9.7% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 103.5% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 86.5% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 77.1% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 9.4% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 103.8% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 83.9% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 74.6% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 9.4% | 182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 101.5% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 86.4% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 77.5% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 8.9% | 183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 102.0% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 85.9% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 76.0% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world | 9.9% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 102.2% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 86.3% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 77.7% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 8.7% | 186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 102.3% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 85.6% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 76.0% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 9.6% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 100.6% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 85.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 75.3% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 9.7% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 100.3% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 86.3% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 76.6% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 9.7% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 102.0% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 89.1% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 79.9% | 48 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.2 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world | 9.2% | 181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 105.4% | 95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 89.7% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | 78.1% | 54 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 11.6% | 148 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 108.0% | 85 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 59.2 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 90.0% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +16.0 pp vs world | 79.6% | 48 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.2 / 100 | +22.1 pp vs world | 10.4% | 166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 107.5% | 91 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 92.6% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 82.0% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +24.9 pp vs world | 10.6% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 110.6% | 87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 91.0% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 79.4% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 11.5% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 108.5% | 87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 90.8% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 79.8% | 42 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.3 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 10.9% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 106.7% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 90.8% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 80.5% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +24.0 pp vs world | 10.2% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 105.4% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 92.4% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 82.3% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world | 10.1% | 187 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.6 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 107.6% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 91.6% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 81.3% | 40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +24.7 pp vs world | 10.3% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 106.5% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 92.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 82.1% | 36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.2 / 100 | +25.5 pp vs world | 10.0% | 185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 107.1% | 84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 90.9% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 81.1% | 33 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +24.1 pp vs world | 9.8% | 185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 106.7% | 88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 91.3% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 80.7% | 32 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 10.6% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 107.2% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 92.7% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 81.9% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +25.0 pp vs world | 10.8% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 109.0% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 93.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 82.4% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +26.1 pp vs world | 11.0% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 110.5% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 94.6% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 83.9% | 27 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +27.5 pp vs world | 10.7% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 110.1% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | 93.3% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 81.5% | 33 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +26.1 pp vs world | 11.8% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 108.1% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 94.4% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | 83.5% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | 10.9% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 108.9% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 96.4% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +24.4 pp vs world | 85.9% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +30.3 pp vs world | 10.5% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 112.0% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | 93.6% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 83.3% | 32 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world | 10.3% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 107.6% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 93.7% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +20.5 pp vs world | 85.2% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +28.6 pp vs world | 8.5% | 191 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 106.7% | 76 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
Asia63.9%2024
Southern Asia73.3%2024
World73.2%2024
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
14.8% → 17.8%
Percentage-point change: +3.0 pp17.8% → 16.0%
Percentage-point change: -1.8 pp16.0% → 12.9%
Percentage-point change: -3.0 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | 14.8% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 13.7% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 1.2% | 79 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 14.6% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 13.2% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 1.4% | 73 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 13.2% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world | 11.9% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 1.3% | 70 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 49.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 12.0% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | 10.8% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 1.2% | 78 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 12.4% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world | 11.5% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -15.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 99 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 28.5 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 15.4% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 13.9% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 66 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 16.4% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 16.7% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | -0.3% | 108 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 17.2% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 16.8% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 0.4% | 96 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 16.0% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 15.7% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 0.3% | 93 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 16.1% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 15.5% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 0.6% | 94 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 16.6% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 16.0% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 0.6% | 97 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 17.6% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 16.4% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 1.3% | 67 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 18.1% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 16.1% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 40 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 17.6% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 16.2% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 44 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 17.2% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 15.7% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 1.4% | 53 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 17.2% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 15.7% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 1.5% | 53 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 17.6% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 16.2% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 1.4% | 47 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 68.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 18.0% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 16.7% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 1.3% | 51 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 16.9% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 15.7% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 63 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 17.8% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 16.5% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 1.3% | 61 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 17.8% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 16.5% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 1.3% | 69 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 17.8% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 16.6% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 75 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 19.0% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 17.8% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 1.2% | 65 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 19.6% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 18.3% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 1.2% | 60 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 18.4% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 17.1% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 1.2% | 75 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 56.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 17.4% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 16.2% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 1.2% | 81 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 18.1% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 16.8% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 1.3% | 61 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 17.3% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 15.9% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 1.3% | 62 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 64.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 17.5% | 166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 15.0% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 2.5% | 32 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 15.6% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 14.0% | 180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 46 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 16.3% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 14.7% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 54 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 16.0% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 14.4% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 51 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 15.0% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 13.4% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 1.6% | 48 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 15.3% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 13.7% | 180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 47 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 15.7% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 14.1% | 184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 16.3% | 181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 14.7% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 18.3% | 167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.4 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 16.7% | 173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 55 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 17.5% | 172 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 15.9% | 178 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 63 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 18.0% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 16.4% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 75 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 17.6% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 16.0% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 1.6% | 37 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 16.0% | 185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 14.4% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 1.6% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 14.6% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 13.0% | 196 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 59 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 15.2% | 185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 13.6% | 193 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 15.0% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 13.4% | 193 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 1.6% | 46 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 14.9% | 187 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.6 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 13.3% | 194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | 1.6% | 43 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 75.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 15.8% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 14.2% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 1.6% | 42 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 15.9% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 14.3% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 1.6% | 38 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 16.3% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 14.7% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 40 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 17.1% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 15.5% | 184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 57 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 15.5% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 13.9% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 50 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | 14.8% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | 13.2% | 190 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | 1.6% | 42 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 76.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 14.5% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 12.9% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -13.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 61 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 15.6% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 14.0% | 189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 72 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | 14.0% | 192 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 12.4% | 194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 1.6% | 45 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 73.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 12.9% | 191 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 11.3% | 194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 42 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 74.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
Asia33.8%2024
Southern Asia31.8%2024
World26.0%2024
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Pakistan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
13.7% → 26.6%
Percentage-point change: +13.0 pp26.6% → 32.0%
Percentage-point change: +5.3 pp32.0% → 27.5%
Percentage-point change: -4.5 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | 5.8% | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 7.9% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -2.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 13.7% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 5.9% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 8.0% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -2.1% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 13.8% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 5.5% | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 6.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | -1.1% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 12.0% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 11.3% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 10.8% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.5% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 22.1% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 10.4% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 13.1% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -2.7% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 23.5% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 8.9% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 15.7% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | -6.8% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 24.6% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 8.1% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 13.9% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | -5.8% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 22.0% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 7.1% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -6.4% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 20.7% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 7.2% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 14.0% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | -6.8% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 21.2% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 8.4% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 16.6% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | -8.1% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 25.0% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 9.6% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 17.7% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | -8.1% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 27.3% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 9.8% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 16.9% | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | -7.2% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 26.7% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 7.8% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 16.0% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | -8.3% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 23.8% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 9.3% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 17.1% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | -7.8% | 110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 38.4 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 26.4% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 8.7% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 16.7% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | -8.0% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 8.1% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 17.2% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | -9.1% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 25.2% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 9.4% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 15.3% | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | -5.9% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 24.6% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 10.5% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 14.5% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | -3.9% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 25.0% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 10.6% | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 14.7% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -4.2% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 25.3% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 10.7% | 160 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 15.4% | 160 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | -4.7% | 106 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 26.2% | 164 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 8.4 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 11.3% | 183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 15.4% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | -4.1% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 26.6% | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 13.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 14.1% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | -1.1% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 27.1% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 13.2% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 15.6% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | -2.3% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 28.8% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 12.4% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 17.0% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | -4.6% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 29.5% | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 12.4% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 14.5% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -2.0% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 26.9% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 12.8% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 14.7% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | -2.0% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 27.5% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 12.2% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 15.8% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | -3.5% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 28.0% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 11.0% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | -3.8% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 25.8% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -17.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 10.8% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 12.3% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | -1.5% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 23.1% | 200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -20.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 9.5% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | -2.0% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 21.0% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -22.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 9.6% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 11.8% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | -2.2% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 21.5% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -25.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 10.6% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 13.0% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | -2.3% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 23.6% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -22.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 11.3% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 11.9% | 203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | -0.6% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 23.1% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -23.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 12.2% | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 12.5% | 204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | -0.3% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 24.7% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -23.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 11.4% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world | 13.4% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | -2.0% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 24.8% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -26.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 12.3% | 196 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 17.6% | 199 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | -5.4% | 106 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 29.9% | 201 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -23.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 12.5% | 192 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world | 20.5% | 198 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | -8.0% | 121 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 33.0% | 202 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -23.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 11.6% | 196 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -18.0 pp vs world | 19.2% | 199 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | -7.5% | 113 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 30.8% | 204 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -27.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 11.9% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -19.1 pp vs world | 22.5% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | -10.6% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 34.3% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -26.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 12.4% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 20.9% | 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -8.5% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 33.3% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -18.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 12.6% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 19.4% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | -6.7% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 32.0% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -24.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 13.5% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 18.9% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | -5.4% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 32.4% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -27.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 11.9% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -18.3 pp vs world | 19.4% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | -7.6% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 31.3% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -28.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 12.2% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -17.9 pp vs world | 18.7% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | -6.5% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 30.9% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -28.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 11.2% | 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -18.5 pp vs world | 18.3% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | -7.1% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 29.5% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -29.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 10.0% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world | 16.7% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | -6.7% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 26.7% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -28.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 8.7% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -18.5 pp vs world | 16.0% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | -7.2% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 24.7% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -28.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 8.2% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world | 17.3% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | -9.0% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 25.5% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -30.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 8.6% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world | 19.0% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | -10.5% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 27.6% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -29.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 9.4% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world | 19.5% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | -10.1% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 28.9% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -26.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | 9.3% | 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 17.4% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | -8.1% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 26.7% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -24.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 9.1% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -19.6 pp vs world | 18.0% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | -8.9% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 27.0% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -29.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 10.5% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -20.4 pp vs world | 22.5% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | -11.9% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 33.0% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -28.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | 10.5% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -18.6 pp vs world | 18.1% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | -7.6% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 28.6% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -28.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 10.4% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -18.6 pp vs world | 17.1% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | -6.7% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 27.5% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -29.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
Asia60.3%2024
Southern Asia43.0%2024
World57.1%2024
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Agriculture, forestry and fishing is the largest current activity at 25.0%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
1970–1990-11.6 pp1990–2010-4.6 pp2010–2024+1.4 pp
World specialization: 5.87×
1970–1990+2.6 pp1990–2010+2.3 pp2010–2024-0.1 pp
World specialization: 0.89×
1970–1990+0.0 pp1990–2010-0.0 pp2010–2024-0.4 pp
World specialization: 0.44×
1970–1990+2.7 pp1990–2010-0.8 pp2010–2024+0.2 pp
World specialization: 1.45×
1970–1990+1.3 pp1990–2010+2.9 pp2010–2024-2.6 pp
World specialization: 0.90×
1970–1990+5.0 pp1990–2010+0.3 pp2010–2024+1.5 pp
World specialization: 0.54×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
39.7% → 28.1%
Percentage-point change: -11.6 pp28.1% → 23.6%
Percentage-point change: -4.6 pp23.6% → 25.0%
Percentage-point change: +1.4 ppHow to read specialization
World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Agriculture, forestry and fishing5.87×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities0.89×
Construction0.44×
Trade, restaurants and hotels1.45×
Transport, storage and communication0.90×
Other activities0.54×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | 39.7% | 22 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +30.3 pp vs world | 14.0% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 2.9% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 18.9% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 7.3% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 17.2% | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 38.2% | 23 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 87.4 / 100 | +29.2 pp vs world | 14.7% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 3.0% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 19.2% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 7.1% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 17.9% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 38.9% | 22 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world | 14.2% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 2.5% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 19.0% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 7.0% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 18.3% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 38.5% | 23 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 87.4 / 100 | +29.3 pp vs world | 14.6% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 2.6% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 18.4% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 7.5% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 18.6% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 37.1% | 25 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | 15.0% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world | 2.6% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 19.7% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 7.4% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 18.2% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 34.8% | 26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | 14.3% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 3.3% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 20.3% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 7.7% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 19.6% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 34.6% | 27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | 14.3% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | 3.9% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 19.9% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 7.5% | 77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 19.8% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 34.7% | 26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world | 14.8% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 3.8% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 19.5% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 7.3% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 19.9% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 34.2% | 26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 14.5% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -16.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.8% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 7.6% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 20.1% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 32.9% | 27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world | 15.0% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 3.8% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 20.2% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 8.0% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 20.1% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 31.9% | 29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world | 16.6% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -14.5 pp vs world | 3.9% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 20.3% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 7.9% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 19.4% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 33.3% | 26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +26.5 pp vs world | 13.6% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -17.1 pp vs world | 3.3% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 19.1% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 10.4% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 20.4% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 33.9% | 25 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world | 13.4% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -16.5 pp vs world | 3.1% | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.0% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 20.5% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 32.5% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +25.5 pp vs world | 13.4% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -16.0 pp vs world | 2.9% | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 22.0% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 30.0% | 33 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 14.1% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.6% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 10.1% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 23.6% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 30.5% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +24.1 pp vs world | 14.0% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 19.9% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.6% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 23.3% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 29.5% | 31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 15.2% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -12.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 19.5% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 9.4% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 23.5% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 28.3% | 33 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 15.7% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 3.0% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 19.8% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.3% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 23.9% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 27.9% | 35 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | 16.3% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 2.9% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 21.0% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 9.1% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 22.8% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 29.0% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +23.7 pp vs world | 15.8% | 124 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 151 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 21.4% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 8.5% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 22.4% | 141 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 28.1% | 43 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.3 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 16.6% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 2.9% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 21.5% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 8.6% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 22.2% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 27.8% | 45 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 16.7% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 2.9% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 21.3% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 9.2% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 22.0% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -18.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 28.4% | 45 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +24.1 pp vs world | 16.4% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 21.0% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 10.1% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 21.3% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 27.0% | 48 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 15.9% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 2.9% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 20.7% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 11.5% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 22.0% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 27.4% | 41 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 80.3 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 15.7% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 2.7% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 20.6% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 11.4% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 22.3% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -18.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 28.1% | 40 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | 15.4% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 2.5% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 20.7% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 11.0% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 22.3% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 27.1% | 48 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +23.0 pp vs world | 15.7% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 2.6% | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 20.5% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 10.8% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 23.3% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -19.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 27.9% | 42 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 15.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 19.1% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 11.4% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 23.9% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -18.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 28.2% | 40 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 15.3% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 17.6% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 12.3% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 23.7% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -19.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 27.4% | 38 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 15.6% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 2.6% | 183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 17.0% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 12.7% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 24.7% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -18.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 26.8% | 33 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 15.3% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 2.8% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 16.8% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 14.1% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 24.1% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 25.5% | 38 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +22.1 pp vs world | 15.8% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 16.9% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 15.0% | 9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 24.0% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 24.0% | 44 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 15.5% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 2.6% | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 16.4% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 16.4% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 25.1% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 23.4% | 43 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.3 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 15.8% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 2.6% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 16.5% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 16.8% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 24.8% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -20.2 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 23.3% | 42 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 17.5% | 126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 2.5% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 16.9% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 16.9% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 22.9% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -21.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 22.6% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 18.0% | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 2.9% | 185 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 18.6% | 47 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 15.6% | 9 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 22.2% | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -22.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 21.5% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +18.2 pp vs world | 18.2% | 120 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 3.1% | 177 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 20.0% | 36 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 13.7% | 13 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 23.4% | 159 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -20.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 20.9% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 17.7% | 122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 3.1% | 181 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.6% | 41 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 15.9% | 5 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 22.8% | 166 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -20.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 20.8% | 43 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 79.6 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 18.4% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 3.3% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 20.3% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 14.8% | 4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 22.4% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -20.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 22.8% | 37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 18.0% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 20.4% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 12.9% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 22.6% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -22.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 23.6% | 37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world | 18.9% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 2.9% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 20.7% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 11.4% | 37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 22.5% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -21.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 24.6% | 32 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +20.4 pp vs world | 19.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 2.6% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 21.0% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 10.7% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 21.8% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -21.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 24.1% | 32 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 20.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 21.4% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 9.5% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 22.3% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 24.6% | 30 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 18.9% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 2.7% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 21.1% | 40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 10.2% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 22.4% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 24.5% | 31 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 19.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 21.3% | 37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 9.8% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 22.7% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 24.3% | 26 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 87.9 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 17.7% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 2.8% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 19.9% | 41 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 12.0% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 23.2% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -21.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 24.0% | 28 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 16.5% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 2.9% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.0% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 13.3% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 24.2% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -20.6 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 23.5% | 28 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 16.3% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 3.1% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.2% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 12.9% | 22 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 24.9% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 23.2% | 29 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 16.4% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 3.5% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 11.2% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 25.9% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -18.3 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 22.0% | 32 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 18.0% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 2.9% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.2% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 10.8% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 26.1% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -18.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | 23.2% | 30 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 17.0% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 18.9% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 11.0% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 27.2% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -18.4 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 24.2% | 26 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 87.9 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 17.5% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 2.6% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.7% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 10.9% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 25.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -19.1 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 23.5% | 28 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 18.6% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 2.9% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 21.9% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 8.9% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 24.2% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -19.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | 24.6% | 24 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +20.3 pp vs world | 19.1% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 2.7% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 21.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 7.1% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 25.1% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -19.0 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 25.0% | 21 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 18.8% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 2.5% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 20.9% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 8.8% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 24.0% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 13.9% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Pakistan was 1.7 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 13.9%
- World specialization
- 0.89×
- Latest year
- 2024
10.9% → 11.9%
Percentage-point change: +1.0 pp11.9% → 13.5%
Percentage-point change: +1.7 pp13.5% → 13.9%
Percentage-point change: +0.4 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Pakistan | 1970 | 10.9% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world | 77.7% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.2% | 40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1971 | 11.4% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 77.8% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 6.5% | 67 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1972 | 11.0% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 77.1% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 1.2% | 148 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1973 | 11.0% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 75.6% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 8.7% | 64 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 64.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1974 | 11.3% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | 75.1% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 6.4% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1975 | 10.4% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 72.8% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 0.5% | 95 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1976 | 10.1% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world | 70.6% | 108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 1.4% | 133 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1977 | 10.1% | 106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 68.3% | 112 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 1.8% | 119 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1978 | 10.2% | 107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 70.2% | 106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 10.2% | 40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1979 | 10.5% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 69.5% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 8.0% | 63 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1980 | 10.8% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 65.0% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 10.3% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1981 | 10.3% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 75.7% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 10.6% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1982 | 10.2% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 76.7% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 13.8% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1983 | 10.3% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 77.0% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 7.0% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1984 | 10.9% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 77.5% | 85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.3 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 7.9% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1985 | 10.7% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 76.5% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 8.1% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1986 | 10.9% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 71.8% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 7.5% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1987 | 11.3% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 72.1% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 7.5% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1988 | 11.3% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 69.7% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 10.0% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1989 | 11.3% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 71.2% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 4.0% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1990 | 11.9% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 71.4% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 5.7% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1991 | 11.6% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 69.6% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 6.2% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1992 | 11.4% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 69.9% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 8.0% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1993 | 11.3% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 70.9% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 1.2% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1994 | 11.3% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 72.1% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 4.5% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1995 | 11.0% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 71.8% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 2.5% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1996 | 10.7% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 68.1% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1997 | 10.4% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 69.5% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 2.8% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1998 | 10.2% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 66.8% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 10.5% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 1999 | 9.8% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 63.0% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 6.9% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2000 | 9.6% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 62.7% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 5.6% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2001 | 10.0% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 63.6% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 10.7% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2002 | 9.9% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 63.9% | 135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 4.3% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2003 | 10.1% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 63.8% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 7.4% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2004 | 11.1% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 63.3% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | 16.3% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2005 | 12.3% | 109 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 68.7% | 117 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 15.7% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2006 | 13.3% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 73.0% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 10.4% | 49 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2007 | 13.1% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 73.7% | 94 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 8.1% | 57 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 72.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2008 | 13.6% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 73.8% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 6.1% | 56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2009 | 13.1% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 72.7% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | -3.9% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2010 | 13.5% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 71.8% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 1.7% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2011 | 13.8% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 71.5% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 2.6% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2012 | 14.2% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 70.9% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 2.0% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2013 | 13.8% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 72.9% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2014 | 14.0% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 73.4% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 5.8% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2015 | 12.9% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 72.7% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 4.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2016 | 12.0% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 72.8% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 4.0% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2017 | 12.1% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 74.3% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 4.9% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2018 | 12.5% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 75.8% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 7.1% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2019 | 13.4% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 74.6% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 4.5% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2020 | 12.1% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 71.5% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | -7.8% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2021 | 12.8% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 72.7% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 10.5% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2022 | 14.5% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 78.0% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 10.8% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2023 | 14.4% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 75.2% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | -5.3% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Pakistan | 2024 | 13.9% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 74.2% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 3.1% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization
Asia0.64×
Southern Asia0.91×
World0.89×