Source-specific country analysis
Lesotho Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | $79.43M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $78 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | $76.28M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -9.3% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | $72 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | $90.37M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 19.1% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | $83 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | $136.78M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 26.1% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | $121 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | $155.91M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.0% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | $133 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | $162.27M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.2% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | $134 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | $160.21M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 16.5% | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | $128 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | $209.74M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 17.6% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | $163 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | $289.22M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 19.7% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | $218 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | $314.79M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -10.9% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | $230 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | $414.16M | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.7% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | $294 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | $420.58M | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | $290 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | $385.98M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | $259 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | $394.04M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | $257 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | $347.02M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | $220 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | $277.92M | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.4% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | $171 | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | 6.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | $310.46M | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $186 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | $415.78M | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $244 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 6.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | $477.52M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.6% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | $274 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | $503.82M | 150 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.1% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | $284 | 167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | $587.89M | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.4% | 43 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | $325 | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | $654.57M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.1% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $355 | 183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | $785.11M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.5% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $419 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | $780.36M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $410 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | $798.47M | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.3% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | $414 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | $893.48M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $458 | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | $895.05M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.8% | 20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | $454 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | $974.02M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.1% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | $490 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | $854.27M | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.9% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | $428 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 8.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | $854.38M | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $427 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | $822.10M | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $410 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | $752.96M | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $376 | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | 7.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | $700.04M | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $351 | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | 6.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | $1.03B | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $520 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | $1.32B | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.3% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | $667 | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 9.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | $1.46B | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | $747 | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 | 10.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | $1.52B | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.3% | 140 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 32.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | $783 | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | $1.68B | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 14.1% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | $861 | 175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | $1.77B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $898 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | $1.74B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.3% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | $879 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | $2.23B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.3% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $1,119 | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 11.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | $2.58B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $1,281 | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 12.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | $2.48B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | $1,218 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | $2.37B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | $1,150 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | $2.44B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | $1,174 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 10.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | $2.36B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.1% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | $1,121 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | $2.11B | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $992 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | $2.31B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.1% | 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | $1,069 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | $2.56B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.5% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | $1,171 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | $2.39B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.4% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | $1,082 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | $2.05B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.2% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | $919 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | $2.41B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.3% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | $1,067 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 8.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | $2.36B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.4% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | $1,030 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | $2.13B | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $921 | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | 7.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | $2.39B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.2% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $1,023 | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$79.43M → $587.89M
Compound annual change: +10.5% CAGR$587.89M → $2.23B
Compound annual change: +6.9% CAGR$2.23B → $2.39B
Compound annual change: +0.5% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | $79.43M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $312.41M | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | $76.28M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $283.25M | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | $90.37M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $337.40M | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | $136.78M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $425.47M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | $155.91M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $451.05M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | $162.27M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $414.16M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | $160.21M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $482.59M | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | $209.74M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $567.68M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | $289.22M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $679.56M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | $314.79M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $605.77M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | $414.16M | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $589.14M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | $420.58M | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $594.89M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | $385.98M | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $616.24M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | $394.04M | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $563.28M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | $347.02M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $578.06M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | $277.92M | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $632.25M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | $310.46M | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $644.77M | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | $415.78M | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $677.62M | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | $477.52M | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $749.43M | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | $503.82M | 150 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $810.10M | 149 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 150 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | $587.89M | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $862.26M | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | $654.57M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $897.69M | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | $785.11M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $937.77M | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | $780.36M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $971.69M | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | $798.47M | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.00B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | $893.48M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.05B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | $895.05M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.15B | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | $974.02M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.25B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | $854.27M | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.19B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | $854.38M | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.22B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | $822.10M | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.28B | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | $752.96M | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.34B | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | $700.04M | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.35B | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | $1.03B | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.41B | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | $1.32B | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.44B | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | $1.46B | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.48B | 177 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | $1.52B | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.54B | 177 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | $1.68B | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.76B | 175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | $1.77B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.86B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | $1.74B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.83B | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | $2.23B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.93B | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | $2.58B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.02B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | $2.48B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.15B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | $2.37B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.19B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | $2.44B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.22B | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | $2.36B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.29B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | $2.11B | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.38B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | $2.31B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.30B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | $2.56B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.27B | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | $2.39B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.24B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | $2.05B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.05B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | $2.41B | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.10B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | $2.36B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.15B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | $2.13B | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.19B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | $2.39B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.30B | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$78 → $325
Compound annual change: +7.4% CAGR$325 → $1,119
Compound annual change: +6.4% CAGR$1,119 → $1,023
Compound annual change: -0.6% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | $78 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | $306 | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1971 | $72 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.2 (world = 100) | $268 | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | 5.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1972 | $83 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) | $308 | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | 5.6 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1973 | $121 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.0 (world = 100) | $376 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 6.6 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1974 | $133 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) | $385 | 165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1975 | $134 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.1 (world = 100) | $341 | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | 6.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1976 | $128 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) | $385 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 6.6 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1977 | $163 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | $440 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1978 | $218 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.7 (world = 100) | $512 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1979 | $230 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | $443 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1980 | $294 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | 10.6 (world = 100) | $419 | 165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1981 | $290 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | $411 | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | 6.5 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1982 | $259 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | $413 | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1983 | $257 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 9.3 (world = 100) | $367 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1984 | $220 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | $366 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 5.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1985 | $171 | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | 6.1 (world = 100) | $389 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1986 | $186 | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) | $387 | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | 5.8 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1987 | $244 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 6.9 (world = 100) | $398 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 5.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1988 | $274 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) | $431 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 6.2 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1989 | $284 | 167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) | $456 | 169 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | 6.5 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1990 | $325 | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | $476 | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 6.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1991 | $355 | 183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | $487 | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 6.8 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1992 | $419 | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) | $501 | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | 7.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1993 | $410 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 8.7 (world = 100) | $511 | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1994 | $414 | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) | $521 | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | 7.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1995 | $458 | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | $538 | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | 7.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1996 | $454 | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) | $584 | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | 7.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1997 | $490 | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 9.1 (world = 100) | $627 | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | 8.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1998 | $428 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 8.1 (world = 100) | $593 | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | 7.6 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 1999 | $427 | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) | $609 | 185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | 7.6 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2000 | $410 | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | $641 | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | 7.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2001 | $376 | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | 7.0 (world = 100) | $669 | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2002 | $351 | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | 6.3 (world = 100) | $674 | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2003 | $520 | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) | $709 | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2004 | $667 | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 9.8 (world = 100) | $731 | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | 8.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2005 | $747 | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 | 10.2 (world = 100) | $757 | 181 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2006 | $783 | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | $793 | 180 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | 8.5 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2007 | $861 | 175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | $902 | 178 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 14.5 / 100 | 9.4 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2008 | $898 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | $945 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 9.8 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2009 | $879 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) | $926 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 9.8 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2010 | $1,119 | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 11.7 (world = 100) | $968 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 10.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2011 | $1,281 | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 12.2 (world = 100) | $1,003 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.1 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2012 | $1,218 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 11.5 (world = 100) | $1,056 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | 10.5 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2013 | $1,150 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 10.7 (world = 100) | $1,064 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2014 | $1,174 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 10.8 (world = 100) | $1,069 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2015 | $1,121 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | 11.0 (world = 100) | $1,090 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | 10.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2016 | $992 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.7 (world = 100) | $1,116 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2017 | $1,069 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.9 (world = 100) | $1,067 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | 9.7 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2018 | $1,171 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | 10.4 (world = 100) | $1,039 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | 9.3 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2019 | $1,082 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 9.5 (world = 100) | $1,012 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | 8.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2020 | $919 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) | $919 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.4 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2021 | $1,067 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | 8.6 (world = 100) | $929 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2022 | $1,030 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) | $941 | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | 7.9 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2023 | $921 | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | 7.0 (world = 100) | $946 | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | 7.8 (world = 100) |
| Lesotho | 2024 | $1,023 | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 | 7.5 (world = 100) | $984 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | 8.0 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
-9.3% → 6.4%
Average annual rate: +5.7%6.4% → 5.3%
Average annual rate: +4.3%5.3% → 5.2%
Average annual rate: +1.6%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 1.1 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1971 | -9.3% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | -12.5% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 1.2 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 19.1% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 15.0% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 1.3 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 26.1% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 21.8% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 1.4 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 6.0% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 2.4% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 1.4 | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1975 | -8.2% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | -11.3% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 1.8 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 16.5% | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 12.8% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 1.8 | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 17.6% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 14.3% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 2.0 | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 19.7% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 16.3% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 2.2 | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1979 | -10.9% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | -13.4% | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -15.6 pp vs world | 2.7 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1980 | -2.7% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -5.5% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 3.3 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 1.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | -1.9% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 3.8 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 3.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.6% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 4.1 | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1983 | -8.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | -11.2% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 4.7 | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 2.6% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | -0.3% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 5.4 | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 9.4% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 6.3% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 6.0 | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 2.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | -0.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 6.7 | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 5.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 7.6 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 10.6% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 8.3% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 8.8 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 8.1% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 5.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 9.9 | 120 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 6.4% | 43 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 4.4% | 39 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 10.7 | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 4.1% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 2.3% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 12.2 | 126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 4.5% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 2.7% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 14.5 | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 3.6% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 2.1% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 15.9 | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 3.3% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 1.9% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 17.2 | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 4.6% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 3.3% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 18.8 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 9.8% | 20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 8.6% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 20.3 | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 8.1% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 7.3% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 21.9 | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1998 | -4.9% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -5.3% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 24.2 | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 3.0% | 117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 2.7% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 26.0 | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 5.1% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 5.1% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 27.0 | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 4.2% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 4.4% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 29.4 | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 0.5% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 33.3 | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 4.7% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 33.7 | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 2.3% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 3.0% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 35.8 | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 2.7% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 3.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 38.1 | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 4.3% | 140 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 32.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 4.7% | 81 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 40.6 | 166 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 14.1% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 13.6% | 9 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 40.9 | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 5.5% | 68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 4.8% | 56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 47.7 | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2009 | -1.3% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | -2.0% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 48.8 | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 5.3% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 4.5% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 51.5 | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 4.6% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 3.7% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 56.3 | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 6.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 5.3% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 57.5 | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 1.8% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 0.7% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 63.4 | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 1.7% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 72.4 | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 3.1% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 1.9% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 79.7 | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 3.6% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 2.4% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 79.5 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2017 | -3.1% | 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | -4.3% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 81.1 | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2018 | -1.5% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -2.7% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 90.6 | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2019 | -1.4% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | -2.6% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 93.9 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2020 | -8.2% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | -9.2% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 2.3% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 1.1% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 103.1 | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 2.4% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 1.3% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 108.8 | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 1.7% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 0.6% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 109.2 | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 5.2% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 4.1% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 115.7 | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
113.1% → 162.3%
Percentage-point change: +49.2 pp162.3% → 134.5%
Percentage-point change: -27.7 pp134.5% → 119.4%
Percentage-point change: -15.1 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | 113.1% | 8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +40.4 pp vs world | 99.7% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +42.7 pp vs world | 13.4% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 123.1% | 26 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | 123.0% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +49.9 pp vs world | 104.4% | 2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +47.4 pp vs world | 18.6% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 137.0% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +36.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 129.1% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +56.2 pp vs world | 110.2% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +53.4 pp vs world | 18.9% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 142.6% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +42.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 124.9% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +53.2 pp vs world | 109.3% | 2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +53.4 pp vs world | 15.5% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 141.2% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +40.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 142.2% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +70.5 pp vs world | 124.1% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +68.4 pp vs world | 18.2% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 157.7% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +57.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | 160.6% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +87.0 pp vs world | 137.1% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +80.5 pp vs world | 23.5% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 182.2% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +81.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 172.4% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +99.4 pp vs world | 148.7% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +92.5 pp vs world | 23.7% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 214.0% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +113.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 163.7% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +90.9 pp vs world | 142.5% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +86.4 pp vs world | 21.2% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 192.5% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +91.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 139.2% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +66.6 pp vs world | 117.6% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +61.7 pp vs world | 21.6% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 169.1% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +67.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | 157.5% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +84.9 pp vs world | 131.3% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +75.2 pp vs world | 26.2% | 24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 197.4% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +96.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | 162.6% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +89.5 pp vs world | 122.0% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +65.5 pp vs world | 40.6% | 7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +24.0 pp vs world | 201.6% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +100.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 171.5% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +98.0 pp vs world | 132.6% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +76.0 pp vs world | 38.9% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +22.1 pp vs world | 211.0% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +110.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 177.0% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +102.4 pp vs world | 139.0% | 2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +81.7 pp vs world | 38.0% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | 222.3% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +121.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | 201.5% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +126.5 pp vs world | 164.5% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +106.6 pp vs world | 37.0% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 232.3% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +131.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 195.1% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +120.8 pp vs world | 161.0% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +103.4 pp vs world | 34.1% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 233.4% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +132.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 180.1% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +105.3 pp vs world | 141.3% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +83.1 pp vs world | 38.9% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | 225.5% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +124.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 177.6% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +102.3 pp vs world | 137.8% | 2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +79.5 pp vs world | 39.8% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 219.8% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +119.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 173.6% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +98.5 pp vs world | 137.7% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +79.6 pp vs world | 35.9% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 215.2% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +114.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 173.5% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +99.1 pp vs world | 137.8% | 1 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +80.0 pp vs world | 35.7% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 221.2% | 2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +120.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 171.6% | 3 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +97.5 pp vs world | 141.3% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +83.6 pp vs world | 30.3% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 219.4% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +119.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 162.3% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +87.5 pp vs world | 135.0% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +76.9 pp vs world | 27.3% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 217.4% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +116.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 159.9% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +84.8 pp vs world | 129.5% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +71.4 pp vs world | 30.3% | 21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 227.4% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +127.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 142.5% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +67.3 pp vs world | 113.8% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +55.5 pp vs world | 28.7% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 211.8% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +111.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 153.7% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +78.1 pp vs world | 124.3% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +65.5 pp vs world | 29.3% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 210.9% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +111.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 144.8% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +69.4 pp vs world | 113.0% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +54.1 pp vs world | 31.8% | 15 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.1 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 202.8% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +102.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 148.2% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +73.3 pp vs world | 113.4% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +54.9 pp vs world | 34.7% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 211.3% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +111.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 145.2% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +70.1 pp vs world | 113.4% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +54.6 pp vs world | 31.7% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 206.7% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +107.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 141.1% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +66.0 pp vs world | 108.0% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +48.9 pp vs world | 33.1% | 12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 197.8% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +98.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | 161.4% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +85.8 pp vs world | 122.3% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +62.7 pp vs world | 39.1% | 10 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 215.0% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +115.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 155.8% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +80.0 pp vs world | 119.8% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +60.0 pp vs world | 36.1% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 203.7% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +103.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 153.3% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +77.7 pp vs world | 118.0% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +58.3 pp vs world | 35.3% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 196.3% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +96.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 139.5% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +63.0 pp vs world | 105.5% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +45.3 pp vs world | 34.0% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 177.0% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +77.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 145.0% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +68.2 pp vs world | 108.4% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +48.2 pp vs world | 36.6% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 174.6% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +74.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 146.0% | 5 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +69.3 pp vs world | 109.0% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +49.2 pp vs world | 37.0% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 174.6% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +74.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 142.1% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +66.2 pp vs world | 106.6% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +47.5 pp vs world | 35.5% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 168.4% | 7 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +68.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 141.7% | 7 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +66.4 pp vs world | 105.2% | 3 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +46.5 pp vs world | 36.5% | 9 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 163.5% | 6 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +63.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 138.8% | 7 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +64.3 pp vs world | 103.6% | 5 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +45.6 pp vs world | 35.2% | 10 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 159.3% | 7 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +59.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 133.6% | 6 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +59.7 pp vs world | 96.6% | 8 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +39.1 pp vs world | 37.0% | 10 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 158.6% | 6 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +59.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 127.3% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +53.4 pp vs world | 89.0% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +31.9 pp vs world | 38.3% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world | 155.3% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +56.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | 138.8% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +62.8 pp vs world | 95.3% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +37.3 pp vs world | 43.5% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +25.5 pp vs world | 169.4% | 4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +70.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 134.5% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +60.0 pp vs world | 94.6% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +37.6 pp vs world | 39.9% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | 165.8% | 4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +66.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 129.0% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +55.2 pp vs world | 90.8% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +34.3 pp vs world | 38.2% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | 154.4% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +55.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 130.9% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +57.2 pp vs world | 91.4% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +34.8 pp vs world | 39.5% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +22.4 pp vs world | 166.6% | 5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +67.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 124.2% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +50.6 pp vs world | 83.6% | 35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | 40.6% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 156.9% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +57.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 115.9% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +42.4 pp vs world | 77.1% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +20.4 pp vs world | 38.8% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 150.0% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +50.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 113.5% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +39.8 pp vs world | 76.6% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world | 36.9% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +20.3 pp vs world | 143.9% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +44.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 116.0% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +42.1 pp vs world | 76.4% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 39.6% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +23.0 pp vs world | 144.8% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | 129.2% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +55.9 pp vs world | 89.5% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | 39.7% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +23.3 pp vs world | 151.4% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +52.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | 123.3% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +50.5 pp vs world | 85.3% | 23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +28.9 pp vs world | 38.1% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 144.8% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +45.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | 121.3% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +48.3 pp vs world | 83.6% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +27.2 pp vs world | 37.7% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +21.1 pp vs world | 148.1% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +48.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | 125.9% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +52.7 pp vs world | 88.8% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +33.4 pp vs world | 37.1% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 152.2% | 5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +52.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 118.4% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +46.5 pp vs world | 83.7% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +28.8 pp vs world | 34.7% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | 146.9% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +47.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 122.0% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +50.0 pp vs world | 86.8% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | 35.2% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 149.4% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +50.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 121.2% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +48.2 pp vs world | 85.8% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +29.4 pp vs world | 35.3% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 155.3% | 6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +56.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 119.4% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +46.2 pp vs world | 85.4% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | 34.1% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 145.7% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +46.5 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
10.0% → 55.1%
Percentage-point change: +45.1 pp55.1% → 31.3%
Percentage-point change: -23.8 pp31.3% → 26.3%
Percentage-point change: -5.0 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | 10.0% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -17.8 pp vs world | 10.6% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | -0.6% | 122 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | 14.0% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 15.3% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | -1.3% | 126 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 13.5% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 14.6% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | -1.1% | 115 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 16.3% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 13.2% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 3.1% | 33 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 15.5% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 16.0% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | -0.5% | 120 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | 21.6% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 22.9% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | -1.4% | 119 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 41.6% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 43.4% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | -1.8% | 125 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 28.8% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 29.3% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | -0.6% | 117 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 29.9% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 26.9% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 2.9% | 38 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | 39.9% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 36.9% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 3.0% | 33 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | 39.0% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 38.5% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 0.5% | 99 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 31.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 39.5% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 38.7% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 0.8% | 79 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 45.2% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 47.8% | 9 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 95.5 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | -2.6% | 133 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | 30.9% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 32.0% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | -1.1% | 118 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 38.2% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 38.7% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | -0.5% | 122 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 45.3% | 7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 47.3% | 6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | -2.0% | 134 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 9.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 42.3% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 41.9% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 0.3% | 84 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 41.7% | 7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 42.7% | 5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | -1.1% | 132 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 47.7% | 3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 48.8% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | -1.1% | 137 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 47.8% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 51.1% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +26.0 pp vs world | -3.2% | 143 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 6.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 55.1% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +29.3 pp vs world | 57.3% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +32.3 pp vs world | -2.2% | 159 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 67.6% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +42.3 pp vs world | 71.0% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +46.7 pp vs world | -3.4% | 163 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 69.3% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +44.6 pp vs world | 71.0% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +47.2 pp vs world | -1.7% | 151 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 57.2% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +33.0 pp vs world | 60.1% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +36.4 pp vs world | -2.8% | 155 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 8.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 57.9% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +33.5 pp vs world | 62.0% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +38.3 pp vs world | -4.0% | 163 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 4.1 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 63.1% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +38.6 pp vs world | 66.3% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +42.6 pp vs world | -3.2% | 165 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 3.5 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 61.5% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +37.1 pp vs world | 63.6% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +39.9 pp vs world | -2.1% | 160 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 6.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 56.7% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +32.3 pp vs world | 60.0% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +36.5 pp vs world | -3.3% | 168 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | 53.6% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +29.6 pp vs world | 55.5% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +32.1 pp vs world | -1.9% | 155 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 47.8% | 4 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 47.8% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 112 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 43.1% | 7 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 44.5% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | -1.4% | 162 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 4.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 37.6% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 38.5% | 10 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | -0.9% | 155 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 9.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 29.5% | 31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 31.8% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | -2.3% | 170 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 28.6% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 31.6% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | -3.1% | 169 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 26.3% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 27.2% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | -0.9% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 21.8% | 123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 21.7% | 107 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 20.4% | 144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 22.1% | 114 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | -1.7% | 176 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 2.2 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 24.9% | 98 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 23.5% | 105 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 1.4% | 72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 28.0% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 26.4% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 74 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 59.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | 30.5% | 42 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.3 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 28.4% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 2.2% | 27 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 31.3% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 29.4% | 37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 1.9% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 25.3% | 80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.0% | 43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | -2.7% | 174 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 35.7% | 23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 35.9% | 15 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | -0.2% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 32.7% | 26 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 31.0% | 23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 34.1% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 29.4% | 33 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 4.7% | 11 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 30.4% | 40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 28.3% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 2.1% | 30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 28.8% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 26.6% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 2.1% | 27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | 22.2% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 27.4% | 46 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | -5.2% | 174 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 0.6 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | 21.4% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 26.0% | 62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | -4.5% | 174 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 0.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | 26.8% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 25.9% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 69 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | 26.3% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 24.3% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 2.0% | 33 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 28.5% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 25.7% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 37 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 27.4% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 27.1% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 128 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 34.2% | 20 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 28.2% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.0% | 9 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 26.3% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 27.9% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | -1.6% | 153 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Lesotho is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
55.8% → 161.1%
Percentage-point change: +105.3 pp161.1% → 150.1%
Percentage-point change: -11.0 pp150.1% → 129.7%
Percentage-point change: -20.4 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | 8.9% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 47.0% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +35.7 pp vs world | -38.1% | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -38.1 pp vs world | 55.8% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +33.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | 11.0% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 62.0% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +50.6 pp vs world | -51.0% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -51.1 pp vs world | 73.0% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +50.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 12.8% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 69.7% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +58.1 pp vs world | -56.9% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -57.1 pp vs world | 82.5% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +59.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 11.9% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 68.0% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +55.1 pp vs world | -56.2% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -56.4 pp vs world | 79.9% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +53.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 11.8% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 84.4% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +68.4 pp vs world | -72.7% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -72.7 pp vs world | 96.2% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +64.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | 12.0% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 108.3% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +93.1 pp vs world | -96.3% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -96.3 pp vs world | 120.2% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +89.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 15.0% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 143.9% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +128.1 pp vs world | -128.9% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -128.8 pp vs world | 158.9% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +127.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 9.7% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 116.6% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +100.5 pp vs world | -106.9% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -106.6 pp vs world | 126.3% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +94.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 14.2% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 94.1% | 7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +78.4 pp vs world | -79.9% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -79.6 pp vs world | 108.4% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +77.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | 18.5% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 128.3% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +111.2 pp vs world | -109.8% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -109.5 pp vs world | 146.9% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +112.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | 18.9% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 127.9% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +109.3 pp vs world | -109.0% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -108.7 pp vs world | 146.8% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +109.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 16.5% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 135.1% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +116.7 pp vs world | -118.6% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -118.2 pp vs world | 151.7% | 21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +115.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 13.9% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 144.3% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +126.9 pp vs world | -130.4% | 177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.6 / 100 | -130.0 pp vs world | 158.2% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +123.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | 12.1% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 152.9% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +136.1 pp vs world | -140.7% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -140.4 pp vs world | 165.0% | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +131.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 12.4% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 155.7% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +138.6 pp vs world | -143.3% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -143.1 pp vs world | 168.1% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +134.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 11.9% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 145.5% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +128.9 pp vs world | -133.6% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -133.5 pp vs world | 157.4% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +124.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 11.9% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 138.7% | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | +122.7 pp vs world | -126.8% | 176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.1 / 100 | -126.6 pp vs world | 150.6% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +118.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 15.2% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 138.1% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +121.5 pp vs world | -122.9% | 176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.1 / 100 | -122.8 pp vs world | 153.3% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +120.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 18.2% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 148.9% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +131.7 pp vs world | -130.6% | 178 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -130.4 pp vs world | 167.1% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +132.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 17.6% | 133 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 148.6% | 3 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +130.8 pp vs world | -130.9% | 179 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -130.6 pp vs world | 166.2% | 12 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +131.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 16.0% | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 145.1% | 5 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +125.9 pp vs world | -129.1% | 204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -128.9 pp vs world | 161.1% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +123.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 15.0% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 154.9% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +136.3 pp vs world | -139.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -139.9 pp vs world | 170.0% | 11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +132.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 17.5% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 141.6% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +122.2 pp vs world | -124.1% | 206 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -124.5 pp vs world | 159.1% | 12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +119.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 20.0% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 143.5% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +125.2 pp vs world | -123.6% | 206 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -124.0 pp vs world | 163.5% | 11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +126.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 20.6% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 134.1% | 5 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +115.1 pp vs world | -113.5% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -113.9 pp vs world | 154.7% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +116.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 20.2% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 142.1% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +121.9 pp vs world | -121.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -122.3 pp vs world | 162.3% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +121.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 22.8% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 141.3% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +120.6 pp vs world | -118.5% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -118.9 pp vs world | 164.1% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +122.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 25.6% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 133.4% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +111.9 pp vs world | -107.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -108.4 pp vs world | 159.0% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +115.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | 33.2% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 145.3% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +123.9 pp vs world | -112.1% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -112.4 pp vs world | 178.5% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +135.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 28.6% | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 129.6% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +108.0 pp vs world | -101.0% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -101.2 pp vs world | 158.2% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +114.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 35.2% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 126.1% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +102.7 pp vs world | -90.9% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -91.0 pp vs world | 161.3% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +114.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 54.4% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | 127.8% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +104.8 pp vs world | -73.4% | 203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -73.4 pp vs world | 182.2% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +136.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 66.8% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world | 134.5% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +111.5 pp vs world | -67.7% | 202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -67.9 pp vs world | 201.3% | 5 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +155.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 60.6% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +36.7 pp vs world | 130.4% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +106.7 pp vs world | -69.8% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -70.0 pp vs world | 191.1% | 7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +143.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 56.9% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | 121.5% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +96.0 pp vs world | -64.6% | 200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -64.9 pp vs world | 178.4% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +127.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 49.3% | 68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world | 113.1% | 7 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +86.5 pp vs world | -63.8% | 203 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -64.2 pp vs world | 162.5% | 10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +108.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 54.1% | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +25.4 pp vs world | 111.5% | 8 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +83.4 pp vs world | -57.4% | 201 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -58.1 pp vs world | 165.5% | 11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +108.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 53.2% | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +23.7 pp vs world | 111.8% | 7 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +82.9 pp vs world | -58.6% | 203 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -59.3 pp vs world | 165.0% | 11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +106.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 52.9% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 108.2% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +78.0 pp vs world | -55.3% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -56.0 pp vs world | 161.1% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +99.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | 44.8% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +18.5 pp vs world | 114.1% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +88.5 pp vs world | -69.4% | 207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -70.0 pp vs world | 158.9% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +107.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 42.1% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 108.0% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +80.3 pp vs world | -65.8% | 207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -66.8 pp vs world | 150.1% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +93.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 47.7% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 102.1% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +72.6 pp vs world | -54.4% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -55.3 pp vs world | 149.8% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +90.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 41.8% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 108.4% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +79.2 pp vs world | -66.6% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -67.6 pp vs world | 150.2% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +90.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 38.2% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 95.1% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +66.0 pp vs world | -56.9% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -57.9 pp vs world | 133.4% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +74.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 38.1% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 88.1% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +59.2 pp vs world | -50.0% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -50.8 pp vs world | 126.3% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +67.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 42.9% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world | 86.8% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +59.3 pp vs world | -43.9% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -44.5 pp vs world | 129.7% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +74.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 45.8% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 90.5% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +64.1 pp vs world | -44.8% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -45.6 pp vs world | 136.3% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +82.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | 47.5% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 98.9% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +71.5 pp vs world | -51.4% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -52.2 pp vs world | 146.4% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +90.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | 49.8% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 94.6% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +66.3 pp vs world | -44.8% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -45.6 pp vs world | 144.4% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +87.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | 46.2% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +18.1 pp vs world | 94.3% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +66.8 pp vs world | -48.1% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -48.7 pp vs world | 140.5% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +84.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | 44.4% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | 96.6% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +71.3 pp vs world | -52.2% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -52.9 pp vs world | 141.1% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +89.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 46.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 93.0% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +65.4 pp vs world | -46.9% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -47.9 pp vs world | 139.2% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +82.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 46.5% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 95.9% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +65.7 pp vs world | -49.4% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -50.2 pp vs world | 142.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +81.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 42.8% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 98.1% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +69.8 pp vs world | -55.3% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -56.1 pp vs world | 140.9% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +83.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 42.0% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 87.7% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +59.6 pp vs world | -45.7% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -46.6 pp vs world | 129.7% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +72.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 45.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 1.81×
World specialization: 1.41×
World specialization: 0.47×
World specialization: 0.67×
World specialization: 0.44×
World specialization: 1.03×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
42.9% → 43.3%
Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp43.3% → 39.1%
Percentage-point change: -4.2 pp39.1% → 45.7%
Percentage-point change: +6.6 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | 24.4% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 7.0% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -23.9 pp vs world | 1.2% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 21.2% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 3.4% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 42.9% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | 17.4% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 7.1% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -23.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 23.1% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 4.7% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 46.0% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 24.3% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 7.0% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -23.5 pp vs world | 1.8% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 19.9% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 6.3% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 40.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 30.6% | 36 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 7.8% | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -23.0 pp vs world | 1.9% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 16.8% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 7.0% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 35.8% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 26.9% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 9.6% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -22.1 pp vs world | 2.3% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 18.0% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 7.5% | 77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 35.7% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | 22.8% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 8.9% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -21.8 pp vs world | 2.5% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 20.5% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 38.5% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 19.2% | 69 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 7.9% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -23.0 pp vs world | 5.2% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 18.5% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 8.2% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 40.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 24.4% | 56 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world | 8.9% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -21.9 pp vs world | 3.5% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 17.3% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 7.9% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 38.0% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 21.0% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 15.8% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 3.6% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 14.0% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 38.7% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | 22.3% | 53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 16.7% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 12.8% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 39.5% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | 19.2% | 61 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 15.4% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 4.5% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 12.0% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 3.7% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 45.2% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 21.3% | 53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 13.1% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 4.1% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 11.6% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 4.1% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 45.8% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 17.0% | 72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 13.7% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world | 5.9% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 12.5% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 4.4% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 46.5% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | 17.2% | 65 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -17.8 pp vs world | 4.2% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 13.6% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 4.8% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 48.7% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 16.3% | 70 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 11.8% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world | 4.6% | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 14.0% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 5.1% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 48.2% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 16.9% | 66 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 11.4% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world | 5.5% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 13.6% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 5.1% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 47.5% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 17.5% | 66 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 12.9% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 4.6% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 13.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 4.9% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 46.8% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 15.9% | 72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 14.0% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world | 5.6% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 14.2% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 5.5% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 44.8% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 15.9% | 76 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 14.3% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 12.7% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 5.2% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 45.3% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 14.3% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 14.7% | 128 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 7.9% | 33 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 12.5% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 5.4% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 45.2% | 18 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 13.6% | 104 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 15.9% | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 9.8% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 12.1% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 43.3% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 7.9% | 133 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 15.1% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 15.1% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 12.3% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 5.7% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 43.9% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 9.7% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 16.2% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 16.4% | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 11.9% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 5.1% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 40.7% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 9.0% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 16.5% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 17.6% | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 12.1% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 5.1% | 168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 39.7% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 9.1% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 19.4% | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 12.8% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 5.1% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 38.8% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 9.3% | 115 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 16.9% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 17.3% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 12.3% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 4.8% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 39.5% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 8.4% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 17.2% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 18.7% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 12.8% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 4.8% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 38.2% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 7.7% | 119 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 41.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 18.8% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 15.0% | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 13.4% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 5.0% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 40.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | 8.8% | 112 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 45.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 20.9% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 13.8% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 12.3% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 4.7% | 183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 39.5% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 9.2% | 106 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 22.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 14.0% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 12.0% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 4.4% | 188 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 38.1% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 8.3% | 112 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 45.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 24.2% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 15.0% | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 11.5% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 4.5% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 36.5% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 8.8% | 104 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 29.8% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 11.3% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 4.6% | 184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 34.1% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 6.8% | 119 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 41.9 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 34.2% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 8.0% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 11.6% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 5.0% | 182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 34.5% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 6.7% | 120 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 41.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 33.0% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 7.9% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 12.0% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 4.8% | 187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 35.5% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 6.5% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 34.1% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 6.1% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 12.0% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 5.6% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 35.6% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 6.1% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 34.2% | 32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 5.9% | 89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 12.4% | 152 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 6.3% | 166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 35.1% | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 5.3% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 36.5% | 33 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 5.6% | 108 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 12.6% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 6.2% | 170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 33.9% | 105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 5.3% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 36.8% | 27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 87.4 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 5.3% | 124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 13.0% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 6.2% | 170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 33.3% | 108 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 5.2% | 122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 38.0% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 5.3% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 12.9% | 145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 5.4% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 33.1% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | 5.9% | 119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 29.4% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 6.5% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 14.0% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 6.0% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 38.2% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 5.4% | 119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.7 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 26.8% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 8.1% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 14.3% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 6.3% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 39.1% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 5.1% | 122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 30.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 6.8% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 14.2% | 123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 37.6% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 5.5% | 115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 25.9% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 8.9% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 15.7% | 97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 6.3% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 37.6% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 5.7% | 116 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 25.4% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 7.3% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 16.3% | 86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 6.4% | 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.2 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 39.0% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 4.4% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 30.0% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 6.1% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 14.6% | 122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 6.4% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 38.5% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 4.2% | 129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 32.1% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 5.7% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 12.8% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.9% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 39.2% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 5.5% | 118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 29.6% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 4.9% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 13.8% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 6.2% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 40.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | 5.6% | 115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 27.6% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 4.9% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 14.4% | 126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 5.8% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 41.7% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | 4.8% | 120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 31.1% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 4.4% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 12.4% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 5.6% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 41.7% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | 5.1% | 114 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 31.3% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 3.5% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 10.6% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 5.4% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 44.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | 6.0% | 117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 33.0% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 2.2% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 8.3% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 4.8% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 45.7% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 6.8% | 107 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 34.2% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 2.4% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 4.5% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 43.8% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 6.9% | 105 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 32.4% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 2.9% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 8.9% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 4.8% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 44.1% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 7.8% | 97 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 30.4% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 2.9% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 6.5% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 4.7% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 47.8% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 7.7% | 100 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 29.9% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 2.7% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 9.6% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 4.3% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 45.7% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 14.0% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Lesotho was 1.6 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 14.0%
- World specialization
- 0.89×
- Latest year
- 2024
5.2% → 12.9%
Percentage-point change: +7.7 pp12.9% → 14.5%
Percentage-point change: +1.6 pp14.5% → 14.0%
Percentage-point change: -0.5 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Lesotho | 1970 | 5.2% | 143 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 18.9 / 100 | -20.7 pp vs world | 75.0% | 108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1971 | 6.0% | 140 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world | 85.3% | 67 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 3.8% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 146 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1972 | 5.6% | 142 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 19.4 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world | 80.3% | 91 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -9.0% | 172 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1973 | 6.4% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -19.3 pp vs world | 81.3% | 86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 15.5% | 20 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 89.1 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1974 | 7.1% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world | 73.4% | 103 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 5.9% | 80 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1975 | 7.1% | 129 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -17.1 pp vs world | 79.8% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | -8.3% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1976 | 6.8% | 133 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 85.9% | 62 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 15.2% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 148 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1977 | 6.3% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -17.9 pp vs world | 70.7% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -5.3% | 164 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 6.9 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1978 | 6.8% | 137 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.3 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world | 43.0% | 142 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 19.4 / 100 | -36.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1979 | 7.1% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world | 42.7% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -34.5 pp vs world | 35.1% | 3 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +31.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1980 | 6.7% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world | 43.9% | 142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -29.7 pp vs world | 16.7% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1981 | 7.2% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -15.3 pp vs world | 54.7% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -18.8 pp vs world | 5.6% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1982 | 8.8% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 64.5% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 23.4% | 8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1983 | 10.1% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 87.5% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 7.1% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1984 | 10.4% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 88.7% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 3.7% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1985 | 9.6% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 84.3% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 5.1% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1986 | 10.6% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 82.2% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1987 | 11.9% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 85.0% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 11.8% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1988 | 12.2% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 85.4% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 18.0% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1989 | 12.7% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 86.0% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 14.4% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1990 | 12.9% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 81.5% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 13.2% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1991 | 12.0% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 79.3% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 2.3% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1992 | 12.4% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 76.8% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 14.7% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1993 | 13.4% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 81.2% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 16.4% | 10 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1994 | 12.3% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 83.2% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 1.4% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1995 | 12.2% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 71.9% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 3.6% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1996 | 13.0% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 75.6% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 8.4% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1997 | 14.7% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 78.5% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 16.4% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1998 | 15.4% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 73.6% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 1999 | 15.0% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 66.8% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 0.9% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2000 | 17.4% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 71.9% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 17.6% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2001 | 23.6% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 79.2% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 26.4% | 8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +27.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2002 | 27.8% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 81.2% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 29.5% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2003 | 26.2% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 79.5% | 68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 13.1% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2004 | 27.2% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 79.8% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 5.9% | 79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2005 | 24.2% | 18 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 70.8% | 110 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -12.0% | 198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2006 | 26.0% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 71.1% | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 8.5% | 60 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2007 | 24.0% | 16 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 65.1% | 128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 2.1% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2008 | 22.7% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 59.6% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | -2.4% | 153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2009 | 18.9% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 64.2% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | -3.3% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2010 | 14.5% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 54.1% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world | 3.3% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2011 | 14.3% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 47.2% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -22.1 pp vs world | -2.8% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2012 | 12.9% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 49.8% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -19.7 pp vs world | -4.2% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2013 | 12.3% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 48.5% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -21.5 pp vs world | -4.1% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2014 | 13.7% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 45.8% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -25.9 pp vs world | -11.4% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -15.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2015 | 17.0% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 52.9% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -23.3 pp vs world | 15.2% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2016 | 18.8% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 63.4% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 17.6% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2017 | 17.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 62.8% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | -9.5% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2018 | 18.9% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 60.9% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 14.1% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2019 | 19.7% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 62.7% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | -0.8% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2020 | 18.5% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 56.1% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -21.5 pp vs world | -9.1% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2021 | 18.8% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 55.1% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -20.3 pp vs world | 7.4% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2022 | 18.9% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 58.2% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world | -2.3% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2023 | 16.4% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 54.0% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world | -13.9% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Lesotho | 2024 | 14.0% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 46.9% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -27.2 pp vs world | 9.8% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization