Tesseron World ObservatoryThe World Quantified
Country contents
JOR · UN M49 400Jordan

Source-specific country analysis

Jordan Economic Overview

UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)

ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
View source and methodology

Three fixed historical periods

Read the economy through three eras

Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.

Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024

01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$53.35B2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 91 of 210
Real GDP growth2.5%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change
GDP per capita$4,6182024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted
Share of world GDP0.0%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator
Largest broad activity47.3%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities
Manufacturing19.5%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap +3.9 pp
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table
Jordan1970$611.66M100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable$391102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 10042.1 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1971$653.04M104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.9%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-3.3 pp vs world$397107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 10039.6 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1972$726.69M104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.7%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+0.4 pp vs world$424110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 10037.5 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1973$832.20M103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-6.6%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-13.0 pp vs world$468116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.0 / 10034.7 (world = 100)0.0%103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1974$961.72M106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world$523121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest32.2 / 10034.9 (world = 100)0.0%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1975$1.26B101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-0.8%135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest24.3 / 100-1.6 pp vs world$663110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 10040.3 (world = 100)0.0%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1976$1.62B100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)14.1%20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+8.9 pp vs world$829100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 10047.5 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1977$2.00B100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)8.3%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+4.2 pp vs world$99093 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10051.2 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1978$2.64B96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)14.7%7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+10.3 pp vs world$1,26888 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10056.3 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1979$3.20B93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)20.8%6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+16.8 pp vs world$1,48686 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10058.4 (world = 100)0.0%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1980$4.14B88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)11.2%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+9.3 pp vs world$1,85279 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 10066.4 (world = 100)0.0%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1981$4.41B85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)17.2%5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+15.2 pp vs world$1,89881 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 10067.7 (world = 100)0.0%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1982$4.69B82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)7.0%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+6.6 pp vs world$1,93483 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 10070.9 (world = 100)0.0%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1983$4.91B81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-2.2%140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100-5.1 pp vs world$1,93483 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 10070.4 (world = 100)0.0%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1984$5.01B82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)4.3%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-0.4 pp vs world$1,88778 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10068.0 (world = 100)0.0%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1985$5.28B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-2.7%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world$1,90076 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10067.8 (world = 100)0.0%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1986$6.38B77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.5%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world$2,19173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10069.1 (world = 100)0.0%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1987$6.73B74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.3%114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world$2,20877 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10062.7 (world = 100)0.0%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1988$6.24B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)1.5%138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest22.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world$1,95486 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10050.5 (world = 100)0.0%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1989$4.26B95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-10.7%175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100-14.5 pp vs world$1,271106 of 179 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10032.0 (world = 100)0.0%95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1990$4.15B113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)-0.3%139 of 179 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-3.3 pp vs world$1,145132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 10026.4 (world = 100)0.0%113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1991$4.32B111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)1.6%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+0.4 pp vs world$1,104132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 10024.7 (world = 100)0.0%111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1992$5.49B104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)14.3%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+12.3 pp vs world$1,329122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10028.2 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1993$5.78B102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)4.5%68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world$1,330120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.0 / 10028.1 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1994$6.43B97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.0%74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+1.7 pp vs world$1,410117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 10028.3 (world = 100)0.0%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1995$6.94B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)6.2%57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world$1,461122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10026.9 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1996$7.14B104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.1%154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.5 pp vs world$1,454123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.5 / 10026.6 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1997$7.47B102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)3.3%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.6 pp vs world$1,481119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 10027.5 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1998$8.16B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)3.0%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100+0.2 pp vs world$1,580117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 10030.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1999$8.40B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)3.4%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world$1,593115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest44.4 / 10029.5 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2000$8.72B97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)4.2%101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world$1,620116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 10029.5 (world = 100)0.0%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2001$9.26B94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.3%52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+3.2 pp vs world$1,683116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 10031.2 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2002$9.88B94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.8%44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+3.6 pp vs world$1,760118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 10031.8 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2003$10.51B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)4.2%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world$1,831126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 10029.9 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2004$11.77B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)8.6%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+4.2 pp vs world$2,001127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.5 / 10029.4 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2005$12.98B100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)8.1%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+4.2 pp vs world$2,153129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 10029.5 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2006$15.53B99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)8.1%48 of 208 · highest-to-lowest77.3 / 100+3.7 pp vs world$2,416129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 10031.0 (world = 100)0.0%99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2007$17.64B102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)8.2%52 of 208 · highest-to-lowest75.4 / 100+3.8 pp vs world$2,584135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest35.3 / 10029.8 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2008$22.66B100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)7.2%39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest81.6 / 100+5.2 pp vs world$3,242131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.8 / 10034.4 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2009$24.54B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)5.0%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+6.4 pp vs world$3,436126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 10038.9 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2010$27.13B94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.3%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100-2.1 pp vs world$3,718126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 10039.0 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2011$29.52B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.7%133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$3,947131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.8 / 10037.7 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2012$31.63B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.4%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100-0.3 pp vs world$4,169129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 10039.4 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2013$34.45B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.6%121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world$4,311127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 10040.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2014$36.85B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)3.4%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+0.3 pp vs world$4,191128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10038.5 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2015$38.59B93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 1000.1 (world = 100)2.5%124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world$4,043125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 10039.7 (world = 100)0.1%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2016$39.89B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)2.0%147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-0.8 pp vs world$3,987129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 10039.0 (world = 100)0.1%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2017$41.61B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)2.5%136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world$4,066132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 10037.8 (world = 100)0.1%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2018$43.37B92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)1.9%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world$4,145135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 10036.7 (world = 100)0.0%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2019$44.50B92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 1000.1 (world = 100)1.8%142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-0.9 pp vs world$4,170134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 10036.7 (world = 100)0.1%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2020$43.70B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)-1.1%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world$4,022128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10036.7 (world = 100)0.1%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2021$46.30B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)3.7%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-2.8 pp vs world$4,183134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 10033.7 (world = 100)0.0%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2022$48.76B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.6%155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world$4,332135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 10033.8 (world = 100)0.0%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2023$51.09B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.9%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100-0.0 pp vs world$4,466137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 10033.7 (world = 100)0.0%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2024$53.35B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)2.5%133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-0.3 pp vs world$4,618138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 10033.8 (world = 100)0.0%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Real GDP trajectory. All series equal 100 in the shared starting year.1970–19901990–20102010–20241.3K982.6688393.498.81970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanAsiaWestern AsiaWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP trajectory

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Nominal GDP across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024111.6T83.7T55.8T27.9T611.7M1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$611.66M → $4.15B

Compound annual change: +10.0% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$4.15B → $27.13B

Compound annual change: +9.8% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$27.13B → $53.35B

Compound annual change: +4.9% CAGR
Nominal GDP$53.35B2024 · Published series · World rank 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP$49.03B2024 · Published series · World rank 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world GDP0.0%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan1970$611.66M100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.37B86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1971$653.04M104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.42B87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1972$726.69M104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.73B88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1973$832.20M103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.35B91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1974$961.72M106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.35B94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1975$1.26B101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$5.31B96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1976$1.62B100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$6.05B94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1977$2.00B100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$6.56B91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1978$2.64B96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$7.52B89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1979$3.20B93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$9.08B87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1980$4.14B88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$10.10B85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1981$4.41B85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$11.84B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1982$4.69B82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.67B76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1983$4.91B81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.39B77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1984$5.01B82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.92B77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1985$5.28B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.57B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1986$6.38B77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$13.26B77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1987$6.73B74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$13.57B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1988$6.24B79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$13.77B78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1989$4.26B95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.29B81 of 179 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1990$4.15B113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.25B101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1991$4.32B111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$12.45B99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1992$5.49B104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$14.24B93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1993$5.78B102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$14.88B91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1994$6.43B97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$15.62B89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1995$6.94B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$16.58B89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1996$7.14B104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$16.93B88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1997$7.47B102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$17.49B88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1998$8.16B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$18.02B88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan1999$8.40B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$18.63B87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2000$8.72B97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$19.42B87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2001$9.26B94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$20.44B87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2002$9.88B94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$21.63B87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2003$10.51B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$22.53B86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2004$11.77B98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$24.46B87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2005$12.98B100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$26.45B88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2006$15.53B99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$28.59B89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest57.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2007$17.64B102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$30.93B90 of 208 · highest-to-lowest57.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2008$22.66B100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$33.16B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2009$24.54B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$34.82B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2010$27.13B94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$35.63B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2011$29.52B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$36.61B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2012$31.63B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$37.49B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2013$34.45B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$38.47B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2014$36.85B96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$39.77B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2015$38.59B93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 1000.1 (world = 100)$40.77B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.1%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2016$39.89B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)$41.58B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.1%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2017$41.61B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)$42.61B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.1%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2018$43.37B92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$43.43B93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.0%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2019$44.50B92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 1000.1 (world = 100)$44.19B93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.1%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2020$43.70B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)$43.70B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.1 (world = 100)0.1%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan2021$46.30B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$45.30B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2022$48.76B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$46.50B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2023$51.09B89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$47.84B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan2024$53.35B91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 1000.0 (world = 100)$49.03B90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 1000.0 (world = 100)0.0%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

Asia$40.60T2024
Western Asia$4.80T2024
World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

GDP per person across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202415.5K11.7K7.9K4.1K249.21970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$391 → $1,145

Compound annual change: +5.5% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$1,145 → $3,718

Compound annual change: +6.1% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$3,718 → $4,618

Compound annual change: +1.6% CAGR
GDP per person$4,6182024 · Published series · World rank 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP per person$4,2442024 · Published series · World rank 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan1970$391102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 10042.1 (world = 100)$3,43078 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10066.1 (world = 100)
Jordan1971$397107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 10039.6 (world = 100)$3,29481 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 10062.2 (world = 100)
Jordan1972$424110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 10037.5 (world = 100)$3,34182 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 10061.0 (world = 100)
Jordan1973$468116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.0 / 10034.7 (world = 100)$3,00987 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10052.7 (world = 100)
Jordan1974$523121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest32.2 / 10034.9 (world = 100)$2,90991 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 10050.8 (world = 100)
Jordan1975$663110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 10040.3 (world = 100)$2,79494 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 10049.3 (world = 100)
Jordan1976$829100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 10047.5 (world = 100)$3,09289 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 10052.8 (world = 100)
Jordan1977$99093 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10051.2 (world = 100)$3,24887 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10054.2 (world = 100)
Jordan1978$1,26888 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10056.3 (world = 100)$3,60985 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 10058.7 (world = 100)
Jordan1979$1,48686 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10058.4 (world = 100)$4,21782 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 10067.1 (world = 100)
Jordan1980$1,85279 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 10066.4 (world = 100)$4,52180 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 10071.9 (world = 100)
Jordan1981$1,89881 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 10067.7 (world = 100)$5,08974 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10080.8 (world = 100)
Jordan1982$1,93483 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 10070.9 (world = 100)$5,21972 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 10084.0 (world = 100)
Jordan1983$1,93483 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 10070.4 (world = 100)$4,88174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10077.8 (world = 100)
Jordan1984$1,88778 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10068.0 (world = 100)$4,86678 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10075.4 (world = 100)
Jordan1985$1,90076 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10067.8 (world = 100)$4,52379 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 10069.0 (world = 100)
Jordan1986$2,19173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10069.1 (world = 100)$4,55779 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 10068.6 (world = 100)
Jordan1987$2,20877 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10062.7 (world = 100)$4,45282 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 10065.8 (world = 100)
Jordan1988$1,95486 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10050.5 (world = 100)$4,31184 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10062.1 (world = 100)
Jordan1989$1,271106 of 179 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10032.0 (world = 100)$3,66988 of 179 · highest-to-lowest51.1 / 10051.9 (world = 100)
Jordan1990$1,145132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 10026.4 (world = 100)$3,383110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 10047.3 (world = 100)
Jordan1991$1,104132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 10024.7 (world = 100)$3,180113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 10044.6 (world = 100)
Jordan1992$1,329122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10028.2 (world = 100)$3,450104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 10048.2 (world = 100)
Jordan1993$1,330120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.0 / 10028.1 (world = 100)$3,421107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 10047.7 (world = 100)
Jordan1994$1,410117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 10028.3 (world = 100)$3,424105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.3 / 10046.9 (world = 100)
Jordan1995$1,461122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 10026.9 (world = 100)$3,490105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.3 / 10047.1 (world = 100)
Jordan1996$1,454123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.5 / 10026.6 (world = 100)$3,446106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 10045.6 (world = 100)
Jordan1997$1,481119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 10027.5 (world = 100)$3,466106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 10044.7 (world = 100)
Jordan1998$1,580117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 10030.0 (world = 100)$3,489108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 10044.4 (world = 100)
Jordan1999$1,593115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest44.4 / 10029.5 (world = 100)$3,531110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 10044.0 (world = 100)
Jordan2000$1,620116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 10029.5 (world = 100)$3,605110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 10043.6 (world = 100)
Jordan2001$1,683116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 10031.2 (world = 100)$3,718109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.3 / 10044.6 (world = 100)
Jordan2002$1,760118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 10031.8 (world = 100)$3,851108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 10045.8 (world = 100)
Jordan2003$1,831126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 10029.9 (world = 100)$3,923108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 10045.9 (world = 100)
Jordan2004$2,001127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.5 / 10029.4 (world = 100)$4,158106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 10047.2 (world = 100)
Jordan2005$2,153129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 10029.5 (world = 100)$4,386107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 10048.5 (world = 100)
Jordan2006$2,416129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 10031.0 (world = 100)$4,448108 of 208 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 10047.7 (world = 100)
Jordan2007$2,584135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest35.3 / 10029.8 (world = 100)$4,530110 of 208 · highest-to-lowest47.3 / 10047.1 (world = 100)
Jordan2008$3,242131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.8 / 10034.4 (world = 100)$4,744113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 10049.0 (world = 100)
Jordan2009$3,436126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 10038.9 (world = 100)$4,876112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 10051.8 (world = 100)
Jordan2010$3,718126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 10039.0 (world = 100)$4,883113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 10050.3 (world = 100)
Jordan2011$3,947131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.8 / 10037.7 (world = 100)$4,893114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 10049.4 (world = 100)
Jordan2012$4,169129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 10039.4 (world = 100)$4,942114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 10049.2 (world = 100)
Jordan2013$4,311127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 10040.1 (world = 100)$4,814115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 10047.2 (world = 100)
Jordan2014$4,191128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10038.5 (world = 100)$4,524120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 10043.5 (world = 100)
Jordan2015$4,043125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 10039.7 (world = 100)$4,271123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 10040.3 (world = 100)
Jordan2016$3,987129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 10039.0 (world = 100)$4,155127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 10038.6 (world = 100)
Jordan2017$4,066132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 10037.8 (world = 100)$4,163128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10037.9 (world = 100)
Jordan2018$4,145135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 10036.7 (world = 100)$4,151133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 10037.0 (world = 100)
Jordan2019$4,170134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 10036.7 (world = 100)$4,141133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 10036.3 (world = 100)
Jordan2020$4,022128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10036.7 (world = 100)$4,022128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 10036.7 (world = 100)
Jordan2021$4,183134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 10033.7 (world = 100)$4,093129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 10035.4 (world = 100)
Jordan2022$4,332135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 10033.8 (world = 100)$4,131132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 10034.9 (world = 100)
Jordan2023$4,466137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 10033.7 (world = 100)$4,182133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 10034.6 (world = 100)
Jordan2024$4,618138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 10033.8 (world = 100)$4,244134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 10034.4 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

Asia$8,4482024
Western Asia$15,5262024
World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Real GDP growth across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202420.812.95-2.8-10.71971198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldConstant prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

0.9% → -0.3%

Average annual rate: +4.5%
Integration1990–2010

-0.3% → 2.3%

Average annual rate: +5.2%
Current era2010–2024

2.3% → 2.5%

Average annual rate: +2.3%
Real GDP growth2.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP-per-person growth1.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Implicit GDP deflator108.82024 · Published series · World rank 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan1970Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailableSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable5.784 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100
Jordan19710.9%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-3.3 pp vs world-4.0%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-6.1 pp vs world6.185 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100
Jordan19725.7%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+0.4 pp vs world1.4%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100-1.9 pp vs world6.485 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100
Jordan1973-6.6%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-13.0 pp vs world-9.9%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-14.3 pp vs world7.286 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100
Jordan19740.0%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world-3.3%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-3.5 pp vs world8.291 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100
Jordan1975-0.8%135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest24.3 / 100-1.6 pp vs world-4.0%146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest18.1 / 100-2.9 pp vs world10.784 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100
Jordan197614.1%20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+8.9 pp vs world10.7%20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+7.3 pp vs world12.582 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100
Jordan19778.3%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+4.2 pp vs world5.0%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+2.7 pp vs world14.180 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100
Jordan197814.7%7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+10.3 pp vs world11.1%8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100+8.5 pp vs world15.182 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100
Jordan197920.8%6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+16.8 pp vs world16.9%5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+14.6 pp vs world14.990 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100
Jordan198011.2%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+9.3 pp vs world7.2%22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+7.1 pp vs world17.292 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100
Jordan198117.2%5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+15.2 pp vs world12.6%7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+12.4 pp vs world17.492 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100
Jordan19827.0%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+6.6 pp vs world2.6%49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.9 / 100+3.9 pp vs world18.492 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100
Jordan1983-2.2%140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100-5.1 pp vs world-6.5%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-7.5 pp vs world20.391 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100
Jordan19844.3%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-0.4 pp vs world-0.3%124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest30.5 / 100-3.1 pp vs world21.092 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100
Jordan1985-2.7%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world-7.1%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-8.7 pp vs world23.391 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100
Jordan19865.5%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world0.8%110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 100-0.6 pp vs world23.791 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100
Jordan19872.3%114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world-2.3%143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100-4.1 pp vs world23.691 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100
Jordan19881.5%138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest22.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world-3.2%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-5.8 pp vs world23.993 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100
Jordan1989-10.7%175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100-14.5 pp vs world-14.9%176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100-16.8 pp vs world28.090 of 179 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100
Jordan1990-0.3%139 of 179 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-3.3 pp vs world-7.8%173 of 179 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-9.0 pp vs world31.691 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.1 / 100
Jordan19911.6%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+0.4 pp vs world-6.0%167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100-5.5 pp vs world33.392 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100
Jordan199214.3%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+12.3 pp vs world8.5%18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.7 / 100+8.0 pp vs world36.990 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 100
Jordan19934.5%68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world-0.8%125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100-1.0 pp vs world37.993 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100
Jordan19945.0%74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+1.7 pp vs world0.1%144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest30.2 / 100-1.7 pp vs world40.5102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100
Jordan19956.2%57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world1.9%117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100+0.3 pp vs world41.3106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100
Jordan19962.1%154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.5 pp vs world-1.3%178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-3.3 pp vs world42.1110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100
Jordan19973.3%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.6 pp vs world0.6%155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world42.7111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100
Jordan19983.0%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100+0.2 pp vs world0.7%143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest30.7 / 100-0.8 pp vs world45.2108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100
Jordan19993.4%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world1.2%128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-1.0 pp vs world45.1111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100
Jordan20004.2%101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world2.1%126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-0.9 pp vs world44.9116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 100
Jordan20015.3%52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+3.2 pp vs world3.1%61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.7 / 100+2.4 pp vs world45.2118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100
Jordan20025.8%44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+3.6 pp vs world3.6%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.7 pp vs world45.6123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.5 / 100
Jordan20034.2%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world1.9%120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.0 / 100+0.2 pp vs world46.6127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.5 / 100
Jordan20048.6%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+4.2 pp vs world6.0%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.9 pp vs world48.1128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100
Jordan20058.1%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+4.2 pp vs world5.5%53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+2.8 pp vs world49.0137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest34.3 / 100
Jordan20068.1%48 of 208 · highest-to-lowest77.3 / 100+3.7 pp vs world1.4%162 of 208 · highest-to-lowest22.2 / 100-1.7 pp vs world54.2137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest34.3 / 100
Jordan20078.2%52 of 208 · highest-to-lowest75.4 / 100+3.8 pp vs world1.8%149 of 208 · highest-to-lowest28.5 / 100-1.2 pp vs world57.0136 of 208 · highest-to-lowest34.8 / 100
Jordan20087.2%39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest81.6 / 100+5.2 pp vs world4.7%59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest72.0 / 100+4.0 pp vs world68.3124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100
Jordan20095.0%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+6.4 pp vs world2.8%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+5.5 pp vs world70.5122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.1 / 100
Jordan20102.3%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100-2.1 pp vs world0.1%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-3.0 pp vs world76.2115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 100
Jordan20112.7%133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-0.5 pp vs world0.2%161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.4 / 100-1.8 pp vs world80.7112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100
Jordan20122.4%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100-0.3 pp vs world1.0%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-0.5 pp vs world84.4108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100
Jordan20132.6%121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world-2.6%190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-4.1 pp vs world89.684 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100
Jordan20143.4%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+0.3 pp vs world-6.0%205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-7.8 pp vs world92.674 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100
Jordan20152.5%124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world-5.6%201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.3 / 100-7.5 pp vs world94.761 of 210 · highest-to-lowest71.3 / 100
Jordan20162.0%147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-0.8 pp vs world-2.7%191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-4.3 pp vs world95.952 of 210 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100
Jordan20172.5%136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world0.2%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-2.1 pp vs world97.749 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100
Jordan20181.9%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world-0.3%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-2.4 pp vs world99.945 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100
Jordan20191.8%142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-0.9 pp vs world-0.2%167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-1.8 pp vs world100.741 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100
Jordan2020-1.1%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world-2.9%68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.9 / 100+1.0 pp vs world100.01 of 210 · highest-to-lowest100.0 / 100
Jordan20213.7%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-2.8 pp vs world1.8%158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world102.2160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100
Jordan20222.6%155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world0.9%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-1.5 pp vs world104.9179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100
Jordan20232.9%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100-0.0 pp vs world1.2%126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100-0.8 pp vs world106.8190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100
Jordan20242.5%133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-0.3 pp vs world1.5%125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-0.5 pp vs world108.8188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.5 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

Asia3.9%2024
Western Asia2.1%2024
World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Final Consumption across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024110.295.480.665.750.91970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

103.7% → 90.4%

Percentage-point change: -13.3 pp
Integration1990–2010

90.4% → 85.2%

Percentage-point change: -5.2 pp
Current era2010–2024

85.2% → 85.5%

Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp
Final consumption85.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Household consumption71.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 63 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Government consumption14.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Domestic demand111.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 63 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan1970103.7%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+31.0 pp vs world72.5%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+15.4 pp vs world31.3%12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+15.7 pp vs world118.6%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100+18.1 pp vs world
Jordan1971102.0%21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.7 / 100+28.9 pp vs world71.8%67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest62.5 / 100+14.8 pp vs world30.1%15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+14.2 pp vs world124.1%27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+23.6 pp vs world
Jordan1972101.4%19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+28.5 pp vs world70.8%66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.1 / 100+14.0 pp vs world30.6%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+14.7 pp vs world125.3%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+25.1 pp vs world
Jordan1973103.4%16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100+31.7 pp vs world69.4%68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.9 / 100+13.5 pp vs world34.0%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+18.4 pp vs world124.4%23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest87.5 / 100+24.2 pp vs world
Jordan1974103.5%19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+31.8 pp vs world66.8%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100+11.2 pp vs world36.7%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100+20.7 pp vs world134.6%12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+34.3 pp vs world
Jordan1975110.2%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100+36.6 pp vs world78.4%38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+21.8 pp vs world31.8%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+14.9 pp vs world142.6%12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+42.1 pp vs world
Jordan1976105.0%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+32.1 pp vs world71.4%58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+15.2 pp vs world33.7%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+17.0 pp vs world145.9%9 of 177 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100+44.9 pp vs world
Jordan1977103.5%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+30.6 pp vs world75.8%43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+19.6 pp vs world27.7%17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+11.1 pp vs world148.7%9 of 177 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100+47.5 pp vs world
Jordan1978100.9%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+28.3 pp vs world73.5%51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+17.5 pp vs world27.4%19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+10.8 pp vs world141.4%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+40.3 pp vs world
Jordan1979107.9%18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+35.3 pp vs world79.4%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+23.4 pp vs world28.5%15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+12.0 pp vs world150.7%9 of 177 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100+49.8 pp vs world
Jordan198092.7%51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.8 / 100+19.5 pp vs world69.7%66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.1 / 100+13.2 pp vs world23.0%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100+6.4 pp vs world140.8%16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100+39.7 pp vs world
Jordan198197.6%39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+24.2 pp vs world74.8%51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+18.2 pp vs world22.8%38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+6.1 pp vs world156.8%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100+55.9 pp vs world
Jordan198299.3%33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+24.7 pp vs world76.3%47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.9 / 100+19.0 pp vs world22.9%41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest77.3 / 100+5.8 pp vs world154.2%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+53.3 pp vs world
Jordan1983101.1%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+26.1 pp vs world78.3%40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest77.8 / 100+20.4 pp vs world22.7%43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+5.7 pp vs world143.0%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+42.2 pp vs world
Jordan198499.9%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+25.6 pp vs world76.1%45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+18.4 pp vs world23.8%36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.1 / 100+7.2 pp vs world136.2%14 of 177 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+35.4 pp vs world
Jordan1985105.4%22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+30.5 pp vs world83.0%28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+24.8 pp vs world22.4%46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest74.4 / 100+5.8 pp vs world130.2%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+29.6 pp vs world
Jordan198696.5%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+21.2 pp vs world74.2%48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.3 / 100+15.9 pp vs world22.3%49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+5.4 pp vs world121.2%26 of 177 · highest-to-lowest85.8 / 100+20.6 pp vs world
Jordan198793.3%45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+18.2 pp vs world70.6%63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest64.8 / 100+12.5 pp vs world22.6%40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest77.8 / 100+5.7 pp vs world121.4%26 of 177 · highest-to-lowest85.8 / 100+20.8 pp vs world
Jordan198889.8%50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.3 / 100+15.4 pp vs world67.1%75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100+9.3 pp vs world22.7%39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest78.4 / 100+6.2 pp vs world118.2%32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100+17.5 pp vs world
Jordan198986.6%58 of 179 · highest-to-lowest68.0 / 100+12.5 pp vs world64.4%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+6.7 pp vs world22.2%39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+5.9 pp vs world115.2%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+14.9 pp vs world
Jordan199090.4%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+15.6 pp vs world69.2%78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest62.3 / 100+11.1 pp vs world21.2%56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.0 / 100+4.6 pp vs world128.8%22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+28.2 pp vs world
Jordan199188.9%64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100+13.8 pp vs world66.7%94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.4 / 100+8.6 pp vs world22.1%50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+5.3 pp vs world120.1%31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+19.8 pp vs world
Jordan199290.2%67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.8 / 100+15.0 pp vs world71.6%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+13.3 pp vs world18.6%81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+1.8 pp vs world130.5%20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+30.6 pp vs world
Jordan199386.0%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+10.4 pp vs world67.2%90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.4 / 100+8.4 pp vs world18.8%79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.8 / 100+2.1 pp vs world130.2%17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest92.2 / 100+30.4 pp vs world
Jordan199482.2%96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100+6.7 pp vs world62.9%105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest49.0 / 100+3.9 pp vs world19.3%68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+2.8 pp vs world122.3%22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+22.4 pp vs world
Jordan199580.4%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+5.5 pp vs world60.3%126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world20.1%61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+3.7 pp vs world120.1%28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100+20.7 pp vs world
Jordan199686.5%73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100+11.5 pp vs world65.6%98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+6.8 pp vs world20.9%55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.5 / 100+4.7 pp vs world123.3%24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest88.7 / 100+23.8 pp vs world
Jordan199788.0%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+13.0 pp vs world66.3%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100+7.2 pp vs world21.8%46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100+5.8 pp vs world119.1%30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest85.8 / 100+19.6 pp vs world
Jordan199889.2%66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest68.3 / 100+13.6 pp vs world68.5%91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100+8.9 pp vs world20.8%53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest74.5 / 100+4.7 pp vs world115.5%44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+15.9 pp vs world
Jordan199988.0%69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 100+12.1 pp vs world67.5%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100+7.8 pp vs world20.4%51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+4.4 pp vs world114.0%47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+14.2 pp vs world
Jordan200095.5%39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.5 / 100+19.9 pp vs world75.3%56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.0 / 100+15.7 pp vs world20.2%49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.5 / 100+4.3 pp vs world122.4%25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest88.2 / 100+22.6 pp vs world
Jordan200195.2%40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.0 / 100+18.8 pp vs world75.7%49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.5 / 100+15.6 pp vs world19.5%54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+3.3 pp vs world120.6%29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+20.6 pp vs world
Jordan200290.7%56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest73.2 / 100+13.8 pp vs world71.4%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+11.2 pp vs world19.3%60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest71.1 / 100+2.7 pp vs world114.9%46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100+15.1 pp vs world
Jordan200391.6%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+14.9 pp vs world71.9%70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.2 / 100+12.0 pp vs world19.7%51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+2.9 pp vs world116.8%39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+16.9 pp vs world
Jordan200494.3%38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.0 / 100+18.5 pp vs world76.2%50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+17.1 pp vs world18.1%71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest65.7 / 100+1.4 pp vs world127.4%20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+27.6 pp vs world
Jordan200598.7%30 of 208 · highest-to-lowest86.0 / 100+23.3 pp vs world82.1%37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+23.4 pp vs world16.6%81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100-0.0 pp vs world139.9%14 of 207 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+40.2 pp vs world
Jordan200697.1%36 of 208 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+22.6 pp vs world79.5%48 of 207 · highest-to-lowest77.2 / 100+21.5 pp vs world17.6%70 of 207 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world131.2%22 of 207 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+31.9 pp vs world
Jordan200798.6%34 of 208 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+24.6 pp vs world81.0%42 of 207 · highest-to-lowest80.1 / 100+23.5 pp vs world17.5%67 of 207 · highest-to-lowest68.0 / 100+1.1 pp vs world135.1%17 of 207 · highest-to-lowest92.2 / 100+35.8 pp vs world
Jordan200892.8%63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.3 / 100+18.8 pp vs world74.4%67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest68.3 / 100+17.3 pp vs world18.4%66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+1.6 pp vs world128.8%31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+29.5 pp vs world
Jordan200989.5%72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100+13.4 pp vs world68.5%86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+10.5 pp vs world20.9%50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.4 / 100+3.0 pp vs world122.0%39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.7 / 100+22.6 pp vs world
Jordan201085.2%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+10.6 pp vs world65.9%91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest56.7 / 100+8.9 pp vs world19.2%64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest69.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world120.2%44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.3 / 100+21.1 pp vs world
Jordan201193.8%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+20.0 pp vs world73.8%61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+17.3 pp vs world20.1%51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+2.8 pp vs world125.6%28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+26.5 pp vs world
Jordan201296.4%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+22.7 pp vs world77.3%51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+20.7 pp vs world19.1%69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 100+2.0 pp vs world127.4%28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+28.3 pp vs world
Jordan2013102.3%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+28.7 pp vs world84.0%34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+27.4 pp vs world18.3%87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest58.7 / 100+1.3 pp vs world128.9%23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100+29.8 pp vs world
Jordan201499.9%33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+26.3 pp vs world81.6%37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.7 / 100+25.0 pp vs world18.2%84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest60.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world125.7%23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100+26.4 pp vs world
Jordan201597.4%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+23.7 pp vs world79.6%37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.7 / 100+22.5 pp vs world17.8%91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest56.7 / 100+1.2 pp vs world122.3%30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+22.8 pp vs world
Jordan201696.5%37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+22.7 pp vs world79.3%34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+22.0 pp vs world17.3%96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest54.3 / 100+0.7 pp vs world119.9%37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.7 / 100+20.7 pp vs world
Jordan201795.9%34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100+22.6 pp vs world79.0%35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 100+22.1 pp vs world16.9%97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.8 / 100+0.5 pp vs world120.7%30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+21.4 pp vs world
Jordan201893.3%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+20.6 pp vs world76.6%37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.7 / 100+20.3 pp vs world16.7%96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest54.3 / 100+0.3 pp vs world117.7%42 of 209 · highest-to-lowest80.3 / 100+18.6 pp vs world
Jordan201991.1%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+18.1 pp vs world74.7%47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100+18.3 pp vs world16.4%106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100-0.2 pp vs world112.5%57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest73.1 / 100+13.1 pp vs world
Jordan202096.4%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+23.1 pp vs world79.8%39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.7 / 100+24.4 pp vs world16.6%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-1.2 pp vs world117.8%47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100+18.3 pp vs world
Jordan202194.7%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+22.8 pp vs world78.9%45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest78.8 / 100+23.9 pp vs world15.8%119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest43.3 / 100-1.1 pp vs world119.9%44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.3 / 100+20.9 pp vs world
Jordan202292.9%54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+20.9 pp vs world77.0%45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest78.8 / 100+21.5 pp vs world15.8%114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100-0.6 pp vs world118.1%56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest73.6 / 100+18.9 pp vs world
Jordan202388.9%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+15.9 pp vs world73.6%56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest73.6 / 100+17.2 pp vs world15.3%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-1.3 pp vs world112.1%64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest69.7 / 100+12.8 pp vs world
Jordan202485.5%75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.6 / 100+12.3 pp vs world71.0%63 of 209 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+14.4 pp vs world14.5%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-2.0 pp vs world111.1%63 of 209 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+11.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

Asia63.9%2024
Western Asia69.1%2024
World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Gross Capital Formation across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202459.248.13725.914.81970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

14.8% → 38.4%

Percentage-point change: +23.6 pp
Integration1990–2010

38.4% → 35.0%

Percentage-point change: -3.4 pp
Current era2010–2024

35.0% → 25.6%

Percentage-point change: -9.5 pp
Gross capital formation25.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 76 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Gross fixed capital formation19.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Changes in inventories5.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 12 of 163 · highest-to-lowest
Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan197014.8%133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-12.9 pp vs world14.7%129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-8.2 pp vs world0.2%110 of 137 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-4.7 pp vs world
Jordan197122.1%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-5.3 pp vs world16.8%116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest34.7 / 100-6.4 pp vs world5.4%11 of 137 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Jordan197223.9%77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100-3.4 pp vs world17.8%112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest36.9 / 100-8.7 pp vs world6.1%10 of 138 · highest-to-lowest93.4 / 100+5.2 pp vs world
Jordan197321.0%100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100-7.6 pp vs world22.0%88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest50.6 / 100-5.2 pp vs world-0.9%122 of 140 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-2.3 pp vs world
Jordan197431.1%44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.6 pp vs world26.0%60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100-0.5 pp vs world5.1%29 of 138 · highest-to-lowest79.6 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan197532.4%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100+5.5 pp vs world27.8%44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+1.4 pp vs world4.6%24 of 140 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100+4.1 pp vs world
Jordan197640.9%15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+12.8 pp vs world32.6%29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+5.7 pp vs world8.3%9 of 139 · highest-to-lowest94.2 / 100+7.1 pp vs world
Jordan197745.2%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+16.8 pp vs world38.1%18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.3 / 100+10.9 pp vs world7.0%8 of 139 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+5.9 pp vs world
Jordan197840.5%17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+12.0 pp vs world36.1%17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+8.5 pp vs world4.4%21 of 139 · highest-to-lowest85.5 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Jordan197942.7%12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+14.4 pp vs world39.0%13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+11.8 pp vs world3.7%26 of 142 · highest-to-lowest82.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world
Jordan198048.1%4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.3 / 100+20.1 pp vs world41.1%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+14.0 pp vs world7.0%9 of 143 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100+6.1 pp vs world
Jordan198159.2%4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.3 / 100+31.7 pp vs world49.3%5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+22.5 pp vs world9.9%4 of 144 · highest-to-lowest97.9 / 100+9.1 pp vs world
Jordan198254.9%7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+28.6 pp vs world45.9%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+19.8 pp vs world9.0%3 of 145 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100+8.9 pp vs world
Jordan198342.0%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+16.1 pp vs world35.9%18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.3 / 100+10.3 pp vs world6.1%7 of 146 · highest-to-lowest95.9 / 100+5.9 pp vs world
Jordan198436.2%19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+9.8 pp vs world32.1%24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest86.9 / 100+6.8 pp vs world4.1%16 of 147 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+3.0 pp vs world
Jordan198524.8%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100-0.9 pp vs world21.6%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world3.2%24 of 148 · highest-to-lowest84.4 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Jordan198624.8%59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100-0.7 pp vs world21.4%82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.0 / 100-3.5 pp vs world3.4%20 of 148 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100+2.8 pp vs world
Jordan198728.1%36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.1 / 100+2.7 pp vs world23.0%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100-1.9 pp vs world5.2%10 of 151 · highest-to-lowest94.0 / 100+4.6 pp vs world
Jordan198828.4%46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest74.4 / 100+2.1 pp vs world25.7%56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+0.3 pp vs world2.7%29 of 151 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+1.8 pp vs world
Jordan198928.6%46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+2.4 pp vs world26.4%47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world2.2%31 of 152 · highest-to-lowest80.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Jordan199038.4%19 of 205 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+12.6 pp vs world29.4%39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+4.4 pp vs world9.0%7 of 174 · highest-to-lowest96.5 / 100+8.3 pp vs world
Jordan199131.2%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+6.0 pp vs world26.9%43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+2.6 pp vs world4.3%26 of 172 · highest-to-lowest85.4 / 100+3.4 pp vs world
Jordan199240.3%11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100+15.6 pp vs world32.8%25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest88.2 / 100+8.9 pp vs world7.5%16 of 167 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+6.7 pp vs world
Jordan199344.2%9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100+20.0 pp vs world38.0%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+14.3 pp vs world6.2%11 of 170 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100+5.7 pp vs world
Jordan199440.1%15 of 205 · highest-to-lowest93.1 / 100+15.7 pp vs world36.1%15 of 205 · highest-to-lowest93.1 / 100+12.5 pp vs world4.0%22 of 170 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Jordan199539.7%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+15.2 pp vs world33.5%18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest91.7 / 100+9.8 pp vs world6.3%12 of 171 · highest-to-lowest93.5 / 100+5.4 pp vs world
Jordan199636.8%20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+12.4 pp vs world33.3%27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+9.5 pp vs world3.5%24 of 171 · highest-to-lowest86.5 / 100+2.8 pp vs world
Jordan199731.0%33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest84.3 / 100+6.7 pp vs world29.2%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+5.7 pp vs world1.8%51 of 172 · highest-to-lowest70.8 / 100+1.0 pp vs world
Jordan199826.3%72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest65.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world24.0%80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world2.4%35 of 168 · highest-to-lowest79.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world
Jordan199926.0%63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest69.6 / 100+2.1 pp vs world26.5%50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+3.0 pp vs world-0.5%135 of 168 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Jordan200027.0%52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+2.7 pp vs world23.9%69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+0.2 pp vs world3.1%25 of 170 · highest-to-lowest85.8 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Jordan200125.4%67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+1.8 pp vs world22.0%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world3.4%22 of 172 · highest-to-lowest87.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan200224.2%73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest64.7 / 100+1.3 pp vs world21.4%99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-1.2 pp vs world2.8%29 of 175 · highest-to-lowest83.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world
Jordan200325.1%68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+2.0 pp vs world23.3%79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.8 / 100+0.6 pp vs world1.8%42 of 174 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Jordan200433.0%23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+9.1 pp vs world28.0%32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest84.8 / 100+4.9 pp vs world5.0%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+4.2 pp vs world
Jordan200541.2%9 of 207 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100+16.9 pp vs world34.7%14 of 207 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+11.0 pp vs world6.5%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100+5.9 pp vs world
Jordan200634.2%26 of 207 · highest-to-lowest87.9 / 100+9.3 pp vs world28.8%40 of 207 · highest-to-lowest81.1 / 100+4.8 pp vs world5.4%11 of 180 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100+4.6 pp vs world
Jordan200736.5%24 of 207 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+11.2 pp vs world31.1%34 of 207 · highest-to-lowest84.0 / 100+6.8 pp vs world5.4%15 of 179 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+4.4 pp vs world
Jordan200836.0%33 of 209 · highest-to-lowest84.6 / 100+10.7 pp vs world31.5%36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest83.2 / 100+7.1 pp vs world4.5%21 of 180 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Jordan200932.5%34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+9.2 pp vs world30.7%36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest83.2 / 100+7.1 pp vs world1.8%32 of 179 · highest-to-lowest82.6 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Jordan201035.0%23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100+10.5 pp vs world30.9%30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+7.3 pp vs world4.2%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Jordan201131.7%35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 100+6.5 pp vs world28.4%40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+4.4 pp vs world3.3%28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest84.8 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Jordan201231.0%39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.7 / 100+5.6 pp vs world24.3%80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100-0.2 pp vs world6.7%10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+5.8 pp vs world
Jordan201326.6%70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 100+1.2 pp vs world22.4%105 of 209 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100-2.2 pp vs world4.2%17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+3.4 pp vs world
Jordan201425.8%71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100+0.1 pp vs world22.2%106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100-2.6 pp vs world3.6%19 of 175 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+2.7 pp vs world
Jordan201524.8%87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest58.7 / 100-0.9 pp vs world21.8%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-3.2 pp vs world3.0%20 of 176 · highest-to-lowest89.1 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Jordan201623.4%97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world20.0%134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-4.9 pp vs world3.4%15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+2.9 pp vs world
Jordan201724.7%82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest61.1 / 100-1.2 pp vs world20.1%134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-5.0 pp vs world4.6%15 of 175 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+3.8 pp vs world
Jordan201824.4%87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest58.7 / 100-2.0 pp vs world20.4%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-5.2 pp vs world4.0%19 of 175 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Jordan201921.4%128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.9 / 100-5.0 pp vs world18.4%157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-7.5 pp vs world3.0%27 of 174 · highest-to-lowest85.0 / 100+2.5 pp vs world
Jordan202021.5%114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100-4.8 pp vs world18.9%141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-7.1 pp vs world2.6%26 of 173 · highest-to-lowest85.5 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Jordan202125.2%82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest61.1 / 100-1.9 pp vs world22.2%110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest47.6 / 100-3.9 pp vs world3.0%32 of 171 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100+2.0 pp vs world
Jordan202225.2%86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100-2.0 pp vs world22.2%107 of 209 · highest-to-lowest49.0 / 100-3.7 pp vs world3.0%43 of 170 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+1.7 pp vs world
Jordan202323.2%102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100-3.1 pp vs world21.2%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-4.6 pp vs world2.0%39 of 169 · highest-to-lowest77.4 / 100+1.5 pp vs world
Jordan202425.6%76 of 209 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100-0.4 pp vs world19.8%136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest35.1 / 100-5.6 pp vs world5.8%12 of 163 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+5.2 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

Asia33.8%2024
Western Asia26.5%2024
World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Jordan is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Trade openness across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024151.311986.654.321.91970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

43.4% → 151.3%

Percentage-point change: +108.0 pp
Integration1990–2010

151.3% → 114.2%

Percentage-point change: -37.1 pp
Current era2010–2024

114.2% → 99.1%

Percentage-point change: -15.2 pp
Exports43.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Imports55.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Net exports-12.2%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade openness99.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Jordan19708.2%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-3.0 pp vs world35.2%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+23.9 pp vs world-26.9%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-26.9 pp vs world43.4%114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100+20.9 pp vs world
Jordan19717.8%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world38.1%72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100+26.7 pp vs world-30.3%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-30.4 pp vs world45.9%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100+23.1 pp vs world
Jordan197214.6%135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest24.3 / 100+2.8 pp vs world45.4%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+33.8 pp vs world-30.8%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-31.0 pp vs world59.9%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100+36.5 pp vs world
Jordan197319.6%118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.9 / 100+6.4 pp vs world49.9%50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.3 / 100+36.9 pp vs world-30.3%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-30.6 pp vs world69.5%84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+43.3 pp vs world
Jordan197426.5%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100+10.4 pp vs world63.3%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+47.2 pp vs world-36.8%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-36.9 pp vs world89.8%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+57.6 pp vs world
Jordan197530.2%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100+14.9 pp vs world74.8%24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+59.6 pp vs world-44.6%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-44.7 pp vs world105.0%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+74.6 pp vs world
Jordan197634.7%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+18.9 pp vs world79.8%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+64.0 pp vs world-45.1%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-45.0 pp vs world114.4%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+82.9 pp vs world
Jordan197735.4%69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.6 / 100+19.6 pp vs world82.6%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+66.5 pp vs world-47.2%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-46.9 pp vs world118.0%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+86.1 pp vs world
Jordan197833.5%72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100+18.0 pp vs world75.0%22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+59.3 pp vs world-41.6%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-41.3 pp vs world108.5%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+77.2 pp vs world
Jordan197936.1%71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+19.2 pp vs world85.8%16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100+68.7 pp vs world-49.7%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-49.5 pp vs world121.9%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+87.8 pp vs world
Jordan198038.8%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+20.5 pp vs world78.0%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+59.4 pp vs world-39.2%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-38.9 pp vs world116.8%37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.7 / 100+79.9 pp vs world
Jordan198144.1%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+26.1 pp vs world95.5%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+77.1 pp vs world-51.4%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-51.0 pp vs world139.6%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+103.2 pp vs world
Jordan198241.2%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100+24.2 pp vs world91.3%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+74.0 pp vs world-50.1%167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.2 / 100-49.7 pp vs world132.6%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+98.2 pp vs world
Jordan198336.6%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100+20.1 pp vs world79.7%20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+63.0 pp vs world-43.2%167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.2 / 100-42.9 pp vs world116.3%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+83.1 pp vs world
Jordan198439.5%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+22.6 pp vs world76.9%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+59.8 pp vs world-37.4%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-37.2 pp vs world116.4%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+82.4 pp vs world
Jordan198538.4%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+21.9 pp vs world72.1%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+55.5 pp vs world-33.8%159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.7 / 100-33.6 pp vs world110.5%39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+77.3 pp vs world
Jordan198629.1%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+13.2 pp vs world53.8%48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest73.4 / 100+37.7 pp vs world-24.7%156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-24.5 pp vs world82.8%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+50.9 pp vs world
Jordan198734.0%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+17.4 pp vs world57.9%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+41.3 pp vs world-24.0%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-23.9 pp vs world91.9%54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+58.8 pp vs world
Jordan198844.7%47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+27.8 pp vs world65.1%34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+47.9 pp vs world-20.4%150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-20.2 pp vs world109.8%40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+75.7 pp vs world
Jordan198956.8%29 of 179 · highest-to-lowest84.3 / 100+39.4 pp vs world73.8%23 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+56.0 pp vs world-16.9%151 of 179 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-16.6 pp vs world130.6%25 of 179 · highest-to-lowest86.5 / 100+95.4 pp vs world
Jordan199061.4%29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+42.5 pp vs world89.9%12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+70.7 pp vs world-28.5%186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest9.8 / 100-28.3 pp vs world151.3%18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.7 / 100+113.2 pp vs world
Jordan199159.0%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100+40.4 pp vs world80.2%19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+61.6 pp vs world-21.3%178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-21.2 pp vs world139.2%21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest90.2 / 100+102.0 pp vs world
Jordan199249.9%43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest79.5 / 100+30.2 pp vs world79.8%21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest90.2 / 100+60.4 pp vs world-29.9%184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest10.7 / 100-30.2 pp vs world129.7%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100+90.5 pp vs world
Jordan199350.1%43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest79.5 / 100+31.3 pp vs world78.7%19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+60.4 pp vs world-28.6%187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest9.3 / 100-29.0 pp vs world128.8%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100+91.7 pp vs world
Jordan199447.6%49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+28.2 pp vs world69.1%29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+50.2 pp vs world-21.5%180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-22.0 pp vs world116.8%31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.4 / 100+78.4 pp vs world
Jordan199551.3%40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.0 / 100+30.7 pp vs world70.7%29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+50.5 pp vs world-19.4%176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.6 / 100-19.8 pp vs world122.0%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+81.2 pp vs world
Jordan199652.4%41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest80.5 / 100+31.3 pp vs world75.8%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+55.1 pp vs world-23.4%182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest11.7 / 100-23.8 pp vs world128.3%25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 100+86.5 pp vs world
Jordan199748.9%49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+26.9 pp vs world69.4%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100+47.9 pp vs world-20.5%175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest15.1 / 100-21.0 pp vs world118.3%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+74.8 pp vs world
Jordan199844.5%55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+22.7 pp vs world62.4%38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.0 / 100+40.9 pp vs world-17.9%164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-18.3 pp vs world106.9%41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest80.5 / 100+63.6 pp vs world
Jordan199943.0%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+21.2 pp vs world59.4%42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest80.0 / 100+37.8 pp vs world-16.4%166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100-16.6 pp vs world102.4%47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest77.6 / 100+59.0 pp vs world
Jordan200041.5%80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest61.5 / 100+17.9 pp vs world66.4%33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.4 / 100+43.0 pp vs world-24.9%186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest9.8 / 100-25.1 pp vs world107.9%49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+60.9 pp vs world
Jordan200141.8%70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100+18.9 pp vs world65.1%32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.9 / 100+42.2 pp vs world-23.3%185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-23.3 pp vs world106.9%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+61.0 pp vs world
Jordan200247.0%59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.7 / 100+23.8 pp vs world64.6%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+41.6 pp vs world-17.6%172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-17.8 pp vs world111.6%46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+65.4 pp vs world
Jordan200347.0%58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+23.1 pp vs world66.3%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+42.5 pp vs world-19.3%174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest15.6 / 100-19.5 pp vs world113.3%45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+65.6 pp vs world
Jordan200451.8%55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+26.0 pp vs world79.9%17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest92.2 / 100+54.5 pp vs world-28.2%187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest9.3 / 100-28.5 pp vs world131.7%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+80.5 pp vs world
Jordan200552.3%62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest70.5 / 100+25.2 pp vs world91.4%14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+64.7 pp vs world-39.1%196 of 208 · highest-to-lowest5.8 / 100-39.5 pp vs world143.6%19 of 208 · highest-to-lowest91.3 / 100+90.0 pp vs world
Jordan200653.4%57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest72.9 / 100+24.7 pp vs world85.2%15 of 208 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+57.2 pp vs world-31.8%188 of 208 · highest-to-lowest9.7 / 100-32.4 pp vs world138.7%27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.4 / 100+81.9 pp vs world
Jordan200753.8%55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest73.9 / 100+24.2 pp vs world89.0%13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.2 / 100+60.1 pp vs world-35.2%192 of 208 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-35.9 pp vs world142.8%21 of 208 · highest-to-lowest90.3 / 100+84.3 pp vs world
Jordan200856.0%54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+25.1 pp vs world84.9%21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+54.6 pp vs world-28.8%178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-29.6 pp vs world140.9%23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.5 / 100+79.7 pp vs world
Jordan200945.1%70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100+18.8 pp vs world67.1%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+41.5 pp vs world-22.0%172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-22.7 pp vs world112.2%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+60.3 pp vs world
Jordan201047.0%72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100+18.4 pp vs world67.2%33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+39.6 pp vs world-20.2%166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-21.1 pp vs world114.2%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+58.0 pp vs world
Jordan201146.6%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100+16.2 pp vs world72.1%36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+42.7 pp vs world-25.6%184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-26.5 pp vs world118.7%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+58.9 pp vs world
Jordan201245.2%76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.1 / 100+15.1 pp vs world72.6%35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 100+43.5 pp vs world-27.4%183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-28.4 pp vs world117.9%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+58.5 pp vs world
Jordan201341.3%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+11.2 pp vs world70.2%35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 100+41.1 pp vs world-28.9%187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-29.9 pp vs world111.4%54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+52.2 pp vs world
Jordan201442.1%82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100+12.4 pp vs world67.8%38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.3 / 100+38.9 pp vs world-25.7%187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-26.5 pp vs world109.9%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+51.3 pp vs world
Jordan201536.5%97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100+8.4 pp vs world58.8%55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100+31.3 pp vs world-22.3%181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-22.9 pp vs world95.4%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+39.7 pp vs world
Jordan201634.4%102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100+7.2 pp vs world54.3%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+27.9 pp vs world-19.9%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-20.7 pp vs world88.7%87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 100+35.1 pp vs world
Jordan201734.7%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+6.6 pp vs world55.4%62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.8 / 100+28.0 pp vs world-20.7%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-21.4 pp vs world90.1%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+34.6 pp vs world
Jordan201835.1%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100+6.0 pp vs world52.8%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100+24.6 pp vs world-17.7%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-18.5 pp vs world88.0%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+30.6 pp vs world
Jordan201936.7%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100+8.5 pp vs world49.2%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+21.7 pp vs world-12.5%155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-13.1 pp vs world85.8%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100+30.2 pp vs world
Jordan202024.2%134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 100-1.9 pp vs world42.0%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100+16.7 pp vs world-17.8%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-18.5 pp vs world66.3%114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 100+14.8 pp vs world
Jordan202130.3%125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100+1.7 pp vs world50.2%82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100+22.5 pp vs world-19.9%167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-20.9 pp vs world80.5%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+24.2 pp vs world
Jordan202242.9%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100+12.0 pp vs world61.0%69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.5 / 100+30.9 pp vs world-18.1%158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-18.9 pp vs world103.9%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+42.9 pp vs world
Jordan202343.8%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+14.8 pp vs world55.9%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+27.6 pp vs world-12.1%147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-12.8 pp vs world99.7%79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+42.3 pp vs world
Jordan202443.4%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+14.4 pp vs world55.6%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100+27.5 pp vs world-12.2%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-13.1 pp vs world99.1%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+42.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

Asia60.3%2024
Western Asia82.0%2024
World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 47.3%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing5.6%
1970–1990+0.6 pp1990–2010-4.9 pp2010–2024+1.6 pp

World specialization: 1.31×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities25.0%
1970–1990+12.1 pp1990–2010-1.4 pp2010–2024-0.8 pp

World specialization: 1.18×

Construction2.8%
1970–1990-1.3 pp1990–2010+0.8 pp2010–2024-1.0 pp

World specialization: 0.48×

Trade, restaurants and hotels10.4%
1970–1990-9.4 pp1990–2010+1.9 pp2010–2024-0.3 pp

World specialization: 0.72×

Transport, storage and communication8.9%
1970–1990+3.2 pp1990–2010-0.7 pp2010–2024-1.2 pp

World specialization: 0.91×

Other activities47.3%
1970–1990-5.3 pp1990–2010+4.3 pp2010–2024+1.6 pp

World specialization: 1.06×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

A one-hundred-percent stacked area chart showing the changing share of six industries.0%25%50%75%100%1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Broad industry structure over time

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

46.7% → 41.4%

Percentage-point change: -5.3 pp
Integration1990–2010

41.4% → 45.7%

Percentage-point change: +4.3 pp
Current era2010–2024

45.7% → 47.3%

Percentage-point change: +1.6 pp
How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing1.31×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities1.18×
Construction0.48×
Trade, restaurants and hotels0.72×
Transport, storage and communication0.91×
Other activities1.06×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table
Jordan19708.3%126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest28.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world15.0%119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.3 / 100-15.8 pp vs world4.2%119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.3 / 100-2.3 pp vs world18.2%55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100+4.1 pp vs world7.6%76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100-0.2 pp vs world46.7%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+15.2 pp vs world
Jordan197112.0%107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+3.0 pp vs world14.1%122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.6 / 100-16.4 pp vs world3.9%128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-2.8 pp vs world17.7%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+3.7 pp vs world7.5%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100-0.4 pp vs world44.8%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+12.8 pp vs world
Jordan197212.0%105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.6 / 100+3.3 pp vs world15.0%121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest32.2 / 100-15.5 pp vs world4.3%121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest32.2 / 100-2.5 pp vs world17.3%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+3.2 pp vs world7.9%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100+0.0 pp vs world43.5%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+11.3 pp vs world
Jordan19737.4%127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest28.0 / 100-1.8 pp vs world17.2%117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest34.5 / 100-13.6 pp vs world6.6%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.2 pp vs world17.3%57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.2 / 100+3.3 pp vs world7.6%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100-0.1 pp vs world43.8%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+12.2 pp vs world
Jordan197411.6%103 of 176 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+2.9 pp vs world14.1%127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest28.8 / 100-17.6 pp vs world6.6%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.0 pp vs world13.4%106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest40.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world8.7%48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.3 / 100+1.0 pp vs world45.6%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100+14.2 pp vs world
Jordan19757.4%125 of 176 · highest-to-lowest29.1 / 100-0.9 pp vs world16.6%119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.3 / 100-14.1 pp vs world5.6%99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100-1.3 pp vs world16.6%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+2.5 pp vs world7.0%87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world46.8%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+14.3 pp vs world
Jordan19768.7%118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest33.1 / 100+0.8 pp vs world14.5%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-16.4 pp vs world6.3%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100-0.5 pp vs world18.3%52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.0 / 100+4.0 pp vs world7.8%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100+0.0 pp vs world44.4%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+11.9 pp vs world
Jordan19777.9%122 of 176 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100+0.1 pp vs world14.3%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-16.4 pp vs world7.1%72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100+0.3 pp vs world18.6%49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+4.4 pp vs world7.3%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-0.6 pp vs world44.8%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+12.0 pp vs world
Jordan19788.7%118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest33.1 / 100+1.2 pp vs world14.5%124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest30.5 / 100-16.0 pp vs world7.7%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+0.9 pp vs world16.2%71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.2 / 100+1.9 pp vs world9.2%44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+1.2 pp vs world43.7%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+10.7 pp vs world
Jordan19795.4%131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest25.7 / 100-2.0 pp vs world16.0%124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest30.5 / 100-14.8 pp vs world8.8%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+2.0 pp vs world16.0%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+1.7 pp vs world8.1%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100+0.2 pp vs world45.8%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+12.7 pp vs world
Jordan19806.8%123 of 176 · highest-to-lowest30.3 / 100-0.1 pp vs world17.7%115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-13.5 pp vs world9.7%24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+3.0 pp vs world16.4%70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+2.2 pp vs world8.4%57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world41.1%30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.6 / 100+7.4 pp vs world
Jordan19816.1%124 of 176 · highest-to-lowest29.7 / 100-0.6 pp vs world20.9%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-9.7 pp vs world9.2%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+2.7 pp vs world16.2%73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+1.9 pp vs world9.1%56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+1.2 pp vs world38.4%40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+4.2 pp vs world
Jordan19825.9%125 of 176 · highest-to-lowest29.1 / 100-0.9 pp vs world20.3%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-9.5 pp vs world8.9%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+2.7 pp vs world16.0%75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100+1.7 pp vs world9.4%45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+1.5 pp vs world39.5%43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+4.3 pp vs world
Jordan19837.3%118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest33.1 / 100+0.3 pp vs world19.8%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-9.6 pp vs world8.5%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+2.5 pp vs world16.0%75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100+1.7 pp vs world9.4%46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest74.4 / 100+1.5 pp vs world39.0%45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan19845.5%126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest28.6 / 100-1.3 pp vs world21.7%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-7.5 pp vs world7.6%43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+1.8 pp vs world16.1%73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+1.6 pp vs world8.9%57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.2 / 100+0.8 pp vs world40.2%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+4.3 pp vs world
Jordan19856.1%121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest31.4 / 100-0.3 pp vs world19.8%109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-9.0 pp vs world5.6%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world15.8%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100+1.1 pp vs world10.9%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+2.9 pp vs world41.8%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+5.1 pp vs world
Jordan19866.7%121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest31.4 / 100+0.8 pp vs world24.1%84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100-3.6 pp vs world4.8%107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 100-1.2 pp vs world13.9%107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest39.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world10.4%25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+2.3 pp vs world40.2%43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Jordan19877.8%113 of 176 · highest-to-lowest36.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world24.3%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-3.1 pp vs world4.1%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-2.0 pp vs world13.2%120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-1.4 pp vs world10.2%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100+2.1 pp vs world40.4%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world
Jordan19887.4%115 of 176 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100+2.0 pp vs world22.5%95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-4.7 pp vs world3.8%128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-2.4 pp vs world11.9%137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.7 / 100-2.7 pp vs world10.6%29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+2.5 pp vs world43.7%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+5.1 pp vs world
Jordan19897.5%116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest34.7 / 100+2.2 pp vs world24.5%77 of 179 · highest-to-lowest57.3 / 100-2.3 pp vs world3.2%144 of 179 · highest-to-lowest19.7 / 100-3.0 pp vs world7.9%164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.9 / 100-6.7 pp vs world12.2%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+4.2 pp vs world44.6%20 of 179 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+5.5 pp vs world
Jordan19908.9%127 of 204 · highest-to-lowest37.9 / 100+3.7 pp vs world27.2%69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 100+0.6 pp vs world3.0%173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest16.1 / 100-3.3 pp vs world8.8%163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-5.7 pp vs world10.7%27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+2.6 pp vs world41.4%37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100+1.9 pp vs world
Jordan19919.3%128 of 204 · highest-to-lowest37.4 / 100+4.6 pp vs world24.6%87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100-1.5 pp vs world3.2%171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest17.1 / 100-2.8 pp vs world9.2%167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest18.6 / 100-5.7 pp vs world10.4%35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+2.2 pp vs world43.3%35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest83.4 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan19929.6%119 of 204 · highest-to-lowest41.9 / 100+5.4 pp vs world20.8%121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-4.5 pp vs world4.9%117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100-1.0 pp vs world10.4%162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-4.9 pp vs world10.9%33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest84.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world43.3%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+2.2 pp vs world
Jordan19937.4%132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest35.5 / 100+3.2 pp vs world19.6%129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest37.6 / 100-5.1 pp vs world6.2%78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.4 / 100+0.2 pp vs world10.8%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-4.3 pp vs world11.3%30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest85.8 / 100+2.9 pp vs world44.8%32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.9 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan19946.4%137 of 204 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world21.9%105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.3 / 100-2.6 pp vs world5.8%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world11.3%152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.0 / 100-3.9 pp vs world10.8%37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100+2.4 pp vs world43.7%34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest83.9 / 100+2.6 pp vs world
Jordan19955.3%147 of 204 · highest-to-lowest28.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world22.0%100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100-2.5 pp vs world5.4%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-0.4 pp vs world11.2%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-4.0 pp vs world10.9%35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+2.4 pp vs world45.2%32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.9 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Jordan19964.7%152 of 204 · highest-to-lowest25.6 / 100+0.7 pp vs world20.5%116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world4.4%140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world11.3%155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.5 / 100-3.7 pp vs world11.8%25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest88.2 / 100+3.2 pp vs world47.2%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+4.9 pp vs world
Jordan19974.1%155 of 204 · highest-to-lowest24.1 / 100+0.1 pp vs world20.9%113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world3.9%158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest23.4 / 100-1.7 pp vs world12.3%144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest29.9 / 100-2.7 pp vs world11.4%35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world47.5%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+4.7 pp vs world
Jordan19983.7%156 of 204 · highest-to-lowest23.6 / 100-0.1 pp vs world22.3%92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100-0.8 pp vs world3.2%175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest15.1 / 100-2.3 pp vs world12.0%151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.5 / 100-3.1 pp vs world11.3%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+2.3 pp vs world47.5%21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest90.2 / 100+4.1 pp vs world
Jordan19992.9%162 of 204 · highest-to-lowest20.7 / 100-0.7 pp vs world22.2%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-0.8 pp vs world3.0%176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.6 / 100-2.4 pp vs world11.8%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-3.3 pp vs world11.6%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world48.4%20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+4.8 pp vs world
Jordan20002.8%161 of 204 · highest-to-lowest21.2 / 100-0.6 pp vs world22.2%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-1.3 pp vs world2.8%177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.1 / 100-2.6 pp vs world11.9%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-3.1 pp vs world11.7%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+2.6 pp vs world48.6%19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+5.0 pp vs world
Jordan20012.7%161 of 204 · highest-to-lowest21.2 / 100-0.7 pp vs world22.0%95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world3.0%175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest15.1 / 100-2.4 pp vs world11.9%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-3.0 pp vs world12.2%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+3.0 pp vs world48.2%22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+3.7 pp vs world
Jordan20023.0%158 of 204 · highest-to-lowest22.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world23.0%84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.5 / 100+0.9 pp vs world2.9%177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.1 / 100-2.3 pp vs world11.1%167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest18.6 / 100-3.8 pp vs world11.5%49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.5 / 100+2.2 pp vs world48.5%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Jordan20033.3%151 of 204 · highest-to-lowest26.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world23.2%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world2.9%178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-2.4 pp vs world10.6%171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-4.1 pp vs world11.7%44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+2.4 pp vs world48.2%22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Jordan20043.3%150 of 204 · highest-to-lowest26.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world24.5%76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 100+1.9 pp vs world3.1%176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.6 / 100-2.4 pp vs world10.7%172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest16.2 / 100-3.9 pp vs world11.9%40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+2.4 pp vs world46.4%35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest83.4 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Jordan20053.6%142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100+0.2 pp vs world23.7%82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 100+0.6 pp vs world3.2%175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-2.3 pp vs world10.6%174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest16.0 / 100-3.9 pp vs world11.2%55 of 207 · highest-to-lowest73.8 / 100+1.8 pp vs world47.7%32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest85.0 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Jordan20063.4%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world24.7%73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest65.2 / 100+1.2 pp vs world3.1%179 of 208 · highest-to-lowest14.0 / 100-2.6 pp vs world11.0%169 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.4 / 100-3.4 pp vs world11.1%47 of 207 · highest-to-lowest77.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world46.8%38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.1 / 100+2.9 pp vs world
Jordan20073.2%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-0.3 pp vs world26.7%67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest68.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world3.3%176 of 208 · highest-to-lowest15.5 / 100-2.4 pp vs world11.1%169 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world10.1%73 of 207 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+0.7 pp vs world45.6%43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest79.7 / 100+2.0 pp vs world
Jordan20083.2%145 of 207 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world29.1%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+5.0 pp vs world3.4%179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-2.3 pp vs world10.9%176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-3.3 pp vs world9.5%89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest57.7 / 100+0.2 pp vs world44.0%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+0.9 pp vs world
Jordan20093.6%140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-0.2 pp vs world26.6%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+4.3 pp vs world4.0%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-1.5 pp vs world10.9%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world9.6%86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+0.4 pp vs world45.4%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+0.3 pp vs world
Jordan20104.0%134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest35.4 / 100-0.0 pp vs world25.8%63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.3 / 100+2.1 pp vs world3.7%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-1.6 pp vs world10.7%176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-3.3 pp vs world10.1%75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+1.0 pp vs world45.7%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+1.8 pp vs world
Jordan20113.9%136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest34.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world26.6%62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.8 / 100+2.4 pp vs world3.4%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-2.0 pp vs world10.5%181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.5 / 100-3.5 pp vs world9.8%74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100+0.9 pp vs world45.7%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+2.5 pp vs world
Jordan20123.7%137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100-0.6 pp vs world25.4%69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.5 / 100+1.3 pp vs world3.4%177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world10.9%177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest15.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world10.0%75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+1.1 pp vs world46.6%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+3.4 pp vs world
Jordan20134.0%131 of 207 · highest-to-lowest36.9 / 100-0.4 pp vs world25.1%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+1.4 pp vs world3.5%177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world11.1%175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-3.0 pp vs world10.0%77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest63.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world46.3%48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+3.0 pp vs world
Jordan20144.4%128 of 207 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100+0.0 pp vs world25.0%66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+1.7 pp vs world3.5%178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-2.1 pp vs world11.0%178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.9 / 100-3.1 pp vs world9.7%89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest57.7 / 100+0.7 pp vs world46.4%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+2.8 pp vs world
Jordan20154.9%121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+0.5 pp vs world24.7%60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest71.8 / 100+2.4 pp vs world3.4%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-2.2 pp vs world10.7%185 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.5 / 100-3.5 pp vs world9.7%88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 100+0.5 pp vs world46.6%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Jordan20165.0%122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world24.1%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+2.4 pp vs world3.4%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-2.2 pp vs world10.6%186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.1 / 100-3.7 pp vs world9.8%81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest61.5 / 100+0.6 pp vs world47.1%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Jordan20175.0%121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+0.6 pp vs world24.2%67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+2.2 pp vs world3.3%183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-2.4 pp vs world10.7%189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-3.7 pp vs world9.6%84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest60.1 / 100+0.3 pp vs world47.3%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+3.0 pp vs world
Jordan20184.9%119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest42.7 / 100+0.8 pp vs world23.9%72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world3.2%186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.5 / 100-2.6 pp vs world10.4%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-3.8 pp vs world9.5%85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.6 / 100+0.3 pp vs world48.0%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+3.8 pp vs world
Jordan20194.9%118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world23.8%68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.9 / 100+2.1 pp vs world3.1%186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.5 / 100-2.7 pp vs world10.3%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-3.9 pp vs world9.5%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+0.0 pp vs world48.4%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+3.9 pp vs world
Jordan20205.2%123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest40.8 / 100+0.6 pp vs world23.2%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100+2.2 pp vs world3.0%183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-2.8 pp vs world10.2%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-3.5 pp vs world8.9%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world49.6%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+3.9 pp vs world
Jordan20215.4%119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest42.7 / 100+0.8 pp vs world23.3%81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.7 / 100+1.0 pp vs world3.0%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-2.7 pp vs world10.2%181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world9.0%98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world49.1%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+5.1 pp vs world
Jordan20225.4%115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest44.7 / 100+0.8 pp vs world24.2%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100+1.4 pp vs world3.1%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-2.6 pp vs world10.4%180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-3.9 pp vs world9.1%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-0.5 pp vs world47.9%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+4.7 pp vs world
Jordan20235.3%112 of 207 · highest-to-lowest46.1 / 100+1.0 pp vs world24.5%73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world3.0%184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-2.8 pp vs world10.4%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-4.1 pp vs world9.3%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world47.6%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+3.6 pp vs world
Jordan20245.6%109 of 207 · highest-to-lowest47.6 / 100+1.3 pp vs world25.0%64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.9 / 100+3.8 pp vs world2.8%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-3.0 pp vs world10.4%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-4.0 pp vs world8.9%110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world47.3%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+2.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 19.5% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Jordan was 3.9 percentage points above the world value.

Latest share
19.5%
World specialization
1.25×
Latest year
2024
Manufacturing share of total gross value added across the full AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–20242621.717.413.18.81970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

JordanWestern AsiaAsiaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Manufacturing share of gross value added

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

12.9% → 19.8%

Percentage-point change: +7.0 pp
Integration1990–2010

19.8% → 21.3%

Percentage-point change: +1.5 pp
Current era2010–2024

21.3% → 19.5%

Percentage-point change: -1.7 pp
Share of total GVA19.5%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share within parent activity78.2%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real manufacturing growth4.2%2024 · Published series · World rank 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world manufacturing0.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table
Jordan197012.9%93 of 176 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100-13.1 pp vs world85.6%67 of 176 · highest-to-lowest62.3 / 100+1.5 pp vs worldSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable0.0%96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197112.6%91 of 176 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100-13.0 pp vs world89.0%44 of 176 · highest-to-lowest75.4 / 100+5.3 pp vs world-2.5%164 of 176 · highest-to-lowest6.9 / 100-5.6 pp vs world0.0%97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197213.1%90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest49.1 / 100-12.4 pp vs world87.7%52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest70.9 / 100+4.0 pp vs world10.5%43 of 176 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+4.1 pp vs world0.0%97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197315.2%82 of 176 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100-10.4 pp vs world88.2%47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+5.1 pp vs world10.0%52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest70.9 / 100+1.0 pp vs world0.0%97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197410.1%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100-15.0 pp vs world71.7%107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100-7.5 pp vs world-35.1%176 of 176 · highest-to-lowest0.0 / 100-36.5 pp vs world0.0%109 of 176 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197512.3%97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100-11.9 pp vs world74.3%100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100-4.8 pp vs world24.8%9 of 176 · highest-to-lowest95.4 / 100+27.7 pp vs world0.0%99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest44.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197610.6%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100-13.7 pp vs world73.1%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100-5.7 pp vs world-10.8%170 of 176 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-18.0 pp vs world0.0%103 of 176 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197710.7%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100-13.4 pp vs world74.5%100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100-3.9 pp vs world2.6%110 of 176 · highest-to-lowest37.7 / 100-1.3 pp vs world0.0%100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197811.1%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100-13.0 pp vs world76.7%93 of 176 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100-2.3 pp vs world19.7%12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+16.2 pp vs world0.0%96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan197912.6%97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 100-11.2 pp vs world78.5%88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest50.6 / 100+1.3 pp vs world33.1%4 of 176 · highest-to-lowest98.3 / 100+29.0 pp vs world0.0%94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198013.5%92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100-9.4 pp vs world76.4%95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world20.5%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+20.2 pp vs world0.0%86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198117.3%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100-5.2 pp vs world82.4%77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100+9.0 pp vs world8.2%43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+6.9 pp vs world0.0%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198216.8%68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.9 / 100-5.3 pp vs world82.7%72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.7 / 100+8.6 pp vs world-0.1%106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest40.3 / 100+1.5 pp vs world0.0%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198316.8%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100-4.9 pp vs world85.1%66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.1 / 100+11.1 pp vs world-2.4%142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-4.2 pp vs world0.0%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198417.5%63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest64.8 / 100-4.3 pp vs world80.7%77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100+6.0 pp vs world19.3%10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+13.9 pp vs world0.0%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198515.5%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-6.3 pp vs world78.3%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+2.7 pp vs world3.4%90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest49.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world0.0%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198619.8%51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100-2.1 pp vs world82.5%67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest62.5 / 100+3.2 pp vs world-4.4%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-6.4 pp vs world0.0%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198720.0%47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.9 / 100-1.8 pp vs world82.1%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100+2.8 pp vs world2.5%113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 100-2.0 pp vs world0.0%72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198817.9%69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100-3.9 pp vs world79.2%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-0.9 pp vs world-10.5%166 of 177 · highest-to-lowest6.3 / 100-16.2 pp vs world0.0%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan198916.9%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-4.5 pp vs world68.9%109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-10.9 pp vs world21.4%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+18.7 pp vs world0.0%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199019.8%66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest68.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world72.9%114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100-5.4 pp vs world2.7%94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world0.0%101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199118.4%74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest64.2 / 100-2.0 pp vs world75.1%109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.1 / 100-3.6 pp vs world0.5%119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest42.2 / 100+0.5 pp vs world0.0%100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.5 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199215.9%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100-3.9 pp vs world76.2%101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100-2.1 pp vs world34.7%7 of 205 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+35.2 pp vs world0.0%101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199315.1%94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.4 / 100-4.0 pp vs world77.4%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100-0.1 pp vs world1.9%93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.9 / 100+2.6 pp vs world0.0%103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199417.9%69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100-1.2 pp vs world81.8%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+3.6 pp vs world16.8%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+13.3 pp vs world0.0%89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199517.0%77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-2.1 pp vs world77.2%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-0.8 pp vs world0.7%149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.5 / 100-4.2 pp vs world0.0%91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199615.6%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-3.0 pp vs world76.0%101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100-0.5 pp vs world-7.5%191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest6.9 / 100-10.1 pp vs world0.0%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199715.8%83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100-2.5 pp vs world75.6%108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 100-0.4 pp vs world11.5%42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+6.9 pp vs world0.0%94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199817.5%61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world78.5%91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100+1.7 pp vs world8.6%43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+7.3 pp vs world0.0%90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan199917.6%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+0.1 pp vs world79.0%79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.8 / 100+3.1 pp vs world7.8%47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+4.5 pp vs world0.0%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200017.6%62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+0.3 pp vs world79.4%78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest62.3 / 100+5.5 pp vs world8.4%69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+2.0 pp vs world0.0%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200117.5%63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest69.6 / 100+1.1 pp vs world79.7%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+7.0 pp vs world7.5%51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+8.3 pp vs world0.0%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200218.6%52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+2.6 pp vs world80.7%71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest65.7 / 100+8.6 pp vs world20.5%9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100+19.5 pp vs world0.0%85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200319.0%43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+3.2 pp vs world81.8%60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest71.1 / 100+10.3 pp vs world2.9%112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world0.0%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200420.1%38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.0 / 100+2.8 pp vs world82.0%59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.7 / 100+5.5 pp vs world16.5%16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world0.0%85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200519.4%40 of 208 · highest-to-lowest81.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world81.6%61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest71.0 / 100+7.6 pp vs world11.9%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100+7.6 pp vs world0.0%88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200621.0%35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest83.6 / 100+3.9 pp vs world85.0%38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.1 / 100+12.5 pp vs world11.2%40 of 207 · highest-to-lowest81.1 / 100+4.6 pp vs world0.0%83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.4 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200722.8%24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.9 / 100+5.7 pp vs world85.4%39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest81.6 / 100+12.9 pp vs world9.2%46 of 207 · highest-to-lowest78.2 / 100+3.2 pp vs world0.0%82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200823.2%17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest92.3 / 100+6.3 pp vs world79.7%66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+9.8 pp vs world5.1%66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest68.6 / 100+3.9 pp vs world0.0%79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan200922.2%18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest91.9 / 100+6.0 pp vs world83.5%41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+10.9 pp vs world2.0%63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.3 / 100+8.3 pp vs world0.1%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201021.3%21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+4.5 pp vs world82.5%45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+11.7 pp vs world2.0%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100-7.0 pp vs world0.0%81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.7 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan201121.6%22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.0 / 100+4.8 pp vs world81.3%48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+12.0 pp vs world3.9%103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-0.5 pp vs world0.0%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan201221.0%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100+4.3 pp vs world82.6%41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+13.1 pp vs world2.4%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.0 pp vs world0.0%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan201321.5%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100+4.9 pp vs world85.5%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100+15.6 pp vs world2.0%112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-1.2 pp vs world0.1%81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.7 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201421.0%22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.0 / 100+4.3 pp vs world84.2%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+12.4 pp vs world1.6%124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100-2.6 pp vs world0.1%79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201520.5%27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+3.4 pp vs world82.7%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+6.5 pp vs world1.4%134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 100-2.2 pp vs world0.1%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201620.0%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+3.3 pp vs world83.1%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+5.8 pp vs world1.3%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100-1.1 pp vs world0.1%75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.6 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201720.1%28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100+3.4 pp vs world83.3%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+7.2 pp vs world1.3%146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.6 / 100-2.1 pp vs world0.1%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201819.9%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+3.0 pp vs world83.2%40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+8.2 pp vs world1.7%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world0.1%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan201919.6%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+3.2 pp vs world82.3%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+6.8 pp vs world2.3%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+0.9 pp vs world0.1%76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.1 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan202019.1%33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+2.8 pp vs world82.1%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+4.5 pp vs world-1.0%64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.9 / 100+1.4 pp vs world0.1%79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan202119.0%37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+2.2 pp vs world81.5%48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+6.0 pp vs world2.3%155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-6.6 pp vs world0.0%82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100-100.0 pp vs world
Jordan202219.1%40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+2.7 pp vs world78.8%61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest71.3 / 100+7.0 pp vs world3.5%103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100+1.5 pp vs world0.1%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan202319.1%36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+3.2 pp vs world78.2%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+4.8 pp vs world3.8%66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+2.3 pp vs world0.1%81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.7 / 100-99.9 pp vs world
Jordan202419.5%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+3.9 pp vs world78.2%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+4.1 pp vs world4.2%76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.1 / 100+1.2 pp vs world0.1%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

Asia0.90×
Western Asia1.40×
World1.25×