Tesseron World ObservatoryThe World Quantified
Country contents
BRA · UN M49 076Brazil

Source-specific country analysis

Brazil Economic Overview

UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)

ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
View source and methodology

Three fixed historical periods

Read the economy through three eras

Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.

Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024

01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$2.19T2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 10 of 210
Real GDP growth3.4%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change
GDP per capita$10,3112024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted
Share of world GDP2.0%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator
Largest broad activity49.7%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities
Manufacturing14.1%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap −1.6 pp
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table
Brazil1970$35.38B15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 1001.0 (world = 100)Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable$371108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 10040.0 (world = 100)1.0%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil1971$39.52B16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 1001.0 (world = 100)11.3%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+7.1 pp vs world$404106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 10040.4 (world = 100)1.0%16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil1972$50.86B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.2 (world = 100)11.9%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+6.6 pp vs world$50897 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.8 / 10044.9 (world = 100)1.2%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil1973$72.01B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)14.0%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+7.5 pp vs world$70288 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10052.1 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1974$92.32B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.5 (world = 100)8.2%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+6.0 pp vs world$87988 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10058.6 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil1975$108.56B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.6 (world = 100)5.2%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+4.4 pp vs world$1,00984 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10061.3 (world = 100)1.6%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil1976$128.35B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)10.3%37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.7 / 100+5.1 pp vs world$1,16577 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10066.7 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1977$149.38B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)4.9%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world$1,32374 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10068.5 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1978$169.60B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)5.0%98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world$1,46778 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10065.2 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1979$186.98B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.7 (world = 100)6.8%51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.8 / 100+2.7 pp vs world$1,57984 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10062.1 (world = 100)1.7%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil1980$176.17B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)9.2%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+7.3 pp vs world$1,45393 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10052.1 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1981$224.38B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.8 (world = 100)-4.2%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-6.2 pp vs world$1,80986 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10064.6 (world = 100)1.8%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1982$245.73B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.0 (world = 100)0.8%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100+0.4 pp vs world$1,93682 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 10070.9 (world = 100)2.0%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil1983$173.01B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.3 (world = 100)-2.9%147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest17.5 / 100-5.8 pp vs world$1,33396 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 10048.5 (world = 100)1.3%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil1984$176.31B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.3 (world = 100)5.4%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100+0.7 pp vs world$1,32994 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 10047.9 (world = 100)1.3%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil1985$188.21B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.4 (world = 100)7.8%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+4.3 pp vs world$1,38993 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10049.6 (world = 100)1.4%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1986$226.41B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.4 (world = 100)7.5%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+4.3 pp vs world$1,63786 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10051.6 (world = 100)1.4%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1987$248.29B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.4 (world = 100)3.5%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100-0.1 pp vs world$1,76087 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10050.0 (world = 100)1.4%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1988$277.35B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.4 (world = 100)-0.1%151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-4.6 pp vs world$1,92887 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10049.8 (world = 100)1.4%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1989$377.26B10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 1001.8 (world = 100)3.2%107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world$2,57571 of 179 · highest-to-lowest60.7 / 10064.8 (world = 100)1.8%10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1990$408.82B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.8 (world = 100)-4.4%167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-7.4 pp vs world$2,74184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.5 / 10063.2 (world = 100)1.8%10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1991$379.16B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1001.6 (world = 100)0.7%126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$2,49988 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10055.8 (world = 100)1.6%11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil1992$362.04B14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)-1.3%152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world$2,34792 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 10049.7 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1993$404.96B13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 1001.5 (world = 100)4.5%65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+2.8 pp vs world$2,58386 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10054.5 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil1994$575.83B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.0 (world = 100)5.5%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.2 pp vs world$3,61676 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 10072.6 (world = 100)2.0%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil1995$769.33B7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1002.5 (world = 100)3.9%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world$4,75769 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10087.5 (world = 100)2.5%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil1996$850.43B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.7 (world = 100)2.2%150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world$5,17969 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10094.6 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil1997$883.21B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.8 (world = 100)3.4%131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$5,29968 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 10098.6 (world = 100)2.8%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.2 pp vs world
Brazil1998$863.71B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.7 (world = 100)0.3%166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100-2.5 pp vs world$5,10669 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10096.9 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil1999$599.64B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1001.8 (world = 100)0.5%161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-3.1 pp vs world$3,49486 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10064.7 (world = 100)1.8%11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil2000$655.45B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)4.4%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-0.1 pp vs world$3,76786 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10068.6 (world = 100)1.9%10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2001$559.98B12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 1001.7 (world = 100)1.4%146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest29.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world$3,17689 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10059.0 (world = 100)1.7%12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2002$509.80B13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 1001.5 (world = 100)3.1%107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100+0.8 pp vs world$2,85694 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10051.6 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil2003$558.23B15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.4 (world = 100)1.1%164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-1.9 pp vs world$3,09195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10050.5 (world = 100)1.4%15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil2004$669.29B14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 1001.5 (world = 100)5.8%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+1.3 pp vs world$3,66494 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10053.8 (world = 100)1.5%14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil2005$891.63B12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.9 (world = 100)3.2%138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest33.2 / 100-0.8 pp vs world$4,82891 of 208 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10066.3 (world = 100)1.9%12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2006$1.11T10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.1 (world = 100)4.0%147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$5,93486 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 10076.1 (world = 100)2.1%10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil2007$1.40T10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.4 (world = 100)6.1%97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world$7,41082 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 10085.3 (world = 100)2.4%10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil2008$1.70T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.6 (world = 100)5.1%78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest62.8 / 100+3.1 pp vs world$8,90883 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 10094.6 (world = 100)2.6%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil2009$1.67T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.7 (world = 100)-0.1%108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+1.3 pp vs world$8,67978 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 10098.4 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil2010$2.21T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.3 (world = 100)7.5%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+3.1 pp vs world$11,40374 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100119.5 (world = 100)3.3%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.7 pp vs world
Brazil2011$2.62T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.5 (world = 100)4.0%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+0.7 pp vs world$13,39772 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100127.8 (world = 100)3.5%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.5 pp vs world
Brazil2012$2.47T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.2 (world = 100)1.9%125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-0.8 pp vs world$12,52277 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100118.5 (world = 100)3.2%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil2013$2.47T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.2 (world = 100)3.0%112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100+0.2 pp vs world$12,45979 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100115.9 (world = 100)3.2%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil2014$2.46T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.1 (world = 100)0.5%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-2.6 pp vs world$12,27580 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100112.6 (world = 100)3.1%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.9 pp vs world
Brazil2015$1.80T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.4 (world = 100)-3.5%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-6.7 pp vs world$8,93689 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 10087.7 (world = 100)2.4%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil2016$1.80T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.3 (world = 100)-3.3%200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.8 / 100-6.0 pp vs world$8,83687 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 10086.4 (world = 100)2.3%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil2017$2.06T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.5 (world = 100)1.3%166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.1 pp vs world$10,08184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 10093.6 (world = 100)2.5%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil2018$1.92T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.8%157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.5 pp vs world$9,30190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 10082.3 (world = 100)2.2%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil2019$1.87T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.1 (world = 100)1.2%158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.4 pp vs world$9,03092 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10079.6 (world = 100)2.1%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil2020$1.48T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.7 (world = 100)-3.3%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world$7,07496 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 10064.5 (world = 100)1.7%12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2021$1.67T13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 1001.7 (world = 100)4.8%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100-1.7 pp vs world$7,97398 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 10064.2 (world = 100)1.7%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2022$1.95T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.9 (world = 100)3.0%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world$9,28197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10072.5 (world = 100)1.9%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2023$2.19T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)3.2%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100+0.3 pp vs world$10,37896 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 10078.3 (world = 100)2.0%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil2024$2.19T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)3.4%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+0.6 pp vs world$10,31197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10075.4 (world = 100)2.0%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Real GDP trajectory. All series equal 100 in the shared starting year.1970–19901990–20102010–2024579.3459.5339.7219.81001970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP trajectory

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Nominal GDP across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024111.6T83.7T55.8T27.9T35.4B1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$35.38B → $408.82B

Compound annual change: +13.0% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$408.82B → $2.21T

Compound annual change: +8.8% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$2.21T → $2.19T

Compound annual change: -0.1% CAGR
Nominal GDP$2.19T2024 · Published series · World rank 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP$1.70T2024 · Published series · World rank 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world GDP2.0%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil1970$35.38B15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 1001.0 (world = 100)$293.62B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.5 (world = 100)1.0%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil1971$39.52B16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 1001.0 (world = 100)$326.91B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.6 (world = 100)1.0%16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil1972$50.86B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.2 (world = 100)$365.95B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.7 (world = 100)1.2%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil1973$72.01B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$417.07B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1974$92.32B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.5 (world = 100)$451.06B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil1975$108.56B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.6 (world = 100)$474.38B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.1 (world = 100)1.6%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil1976$128.35B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$523.05B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1977$149.38B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$548.84B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1978$169.60B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$576.12B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.8%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1979$186.98B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.7 (world = 100)$615.06B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.7%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil1980$176.17B14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$671.83B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.4 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1981$224.38B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$643.28B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.3 (world = 100)1.8%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1982$245.73B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.0 (world = 100)$648.62B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.3 (world = 100)2.0%9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil1983$173.01B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.3 (world = 100)$629.61B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.1 (world = 100)1.3%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil1984$176.31B13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.3 (world = 100)$663.61B8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.3%13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil1985$188.21B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$715.70B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.4%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1986$226.41B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$769.31B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.3 (world = 100)1.4%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1987$248.29B11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$796.46B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.3 (world = 100)1.4%11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1988$277.35B12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$795.99B9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.4%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1989$377.26B10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$821.14B9 of 179 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 1002.2 (world = 100)1.8%10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1990$408.82B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$785.42B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1002.1 (world = 100)1.8%10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil1991$379.16B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1001.6 (world = 100)$790.97B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.6%11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil1992$362.04B14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$781.07B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.4%14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil1993$404.96B13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 1001.5 (world = 100)$816.23B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil1994$575.83B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.0 (world = 100)$861.23B9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 1002.1 (world = 100)2.0%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil1995$769.33B7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1002.5 (world = 100)$894.74B9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 1002.1 (world = 100)2.5%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil1996$850.43B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.7 (world = 100)$914.51B9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 1002.1 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil1997$883.21B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.8 (world = 100)$945.55B9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 1002.1 (world = 100)2.8%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.2 pp vs world
Brazil1998$863.71B8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 1002.7 (world = 100)$948.75B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1002.0 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil1999$599.64B11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 1001.8 (world = 100)$953.19B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.8%11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil2000$655.45B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)$995.01B10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.9%10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2001$559.98B12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 1001.7 (world = 100)$1.01T10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.7%12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2002$509.80B13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 1001.5 (world = 100)$1.04T10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1002.0 (world = 100)1.5%13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil2003$558.23B15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 1001.4 (world = 100)$1.05T10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.4%15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil2004$669.29B14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 1001.5 (world = 100)$1.11T10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.5%14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil2005$891.63B12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.9 (world = 100)$1.15T11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.9 (world = 100)1.9%12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2006$1.11T10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.1 (world = 100)$1.19T12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.9 (world = 100)2.1%10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil2007$1.40T10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.4 (world = 100)$1.27T12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.9 (world = 100)2.4%10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil2008$1.70T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.6 (world = 100)$1.33T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)2.6%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil2009$1.67T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.7 (world = 100)$1.33T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)2.7%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil2010$2.21T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.3 (world = 100)$1.43T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.1 (world = 100)3.3%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.7 pp vs world
Brazil2011$2.62T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.5 (world = 100)$1.49T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.1 (world = 100)3.5%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.5 pp vs world
Brazil2012$2.47T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.2 (world = 100)$1.51T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.1 (world = 100)3.2%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil2013$2.47T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.2 (world = 100)$1.56T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.1 (world = 100)3.2%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil2014$2.46T7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 1003.1 (world = 100)$1.57T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)3.1%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-96.9 pp vs world
Brazil2015$1.80T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.4 (world = 100)$1.51T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.9 (world = 100)2.4%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil2016$1.80T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.3 (world = 100)$1.46T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.8 (world = 100)2.3%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil2017$2.06T8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 1002.5 (world = 100)$1.48T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.8 (world = 100)2.5%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil2018$1.92T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.2 (world = 100)$1.51T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.7 (world = 100)2.2%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil2019$1.87T9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 1002.1 (world = 100)$1.53T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.7 (world = 100)2.1%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil2020$1.48T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.7 (world = 100)$1.48T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.7 (world = 100)1.7%12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2021$1.67T13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 1001.7 (world = 100)$1.55T12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 1001.7 (world = 100)1.7%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil2022$1.95T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.9 (world = 100)$1.59T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.7 (world = 100)1.9%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil2023$2.19T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)$1.64T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.7 (world = 100)2.0%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil2024$2.19T10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 1002.0 (world = 100)$1.70T11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 1001.7 (world = 100)2.0%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

South America$4.34T2024
World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

GDP per person across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202413.7K10.3K7K3.7K3711970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$371 → $2,741

Compound annual change: +10.5% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$2,741 → $11,403

Compound annual change: +7.4% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$11,403 → $10,311

Compound annual change: -0.7% CAGR
GDP per person$10,3112024 · Published series · World rank 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP per person$8,0232024 · Published series · World rank 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil1970$371108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 10040.0 (world = 100)$3,07981 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 10059.3 (world = 100)
Brazil1971$404106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 10040.4 (world = 100)$3,34580 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 10063.1 (world = 100)
Brazil1972$50897 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.8 / 10044.9 (world = 100)$3,65476 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10066.8 (world = 100)
Brazil1973$70288 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10052.1 (world = 100)$4,06574 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10071.1 (world = 100)
Brazil1974$87988 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 10058.6 (world = 100)$4,29273 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10075.0 (world = 100)
Brazil1975$1,00984 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10061.3 (world = 100)$4,40872 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 10077.8 (world = 100)
Brazil1976$1,16577 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10066.7 (world = 100)$4,74671 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 10081.0 (world = 100)
Brazil1977$1,32374 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10068.5 (world = 100)$4,86270 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 10081.2 (world = 100)
Brazil1978$1,46778 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10065.2 (world = 100)$4,98473 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10081.1 (world = 100)
Brazil1979$1,57984 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10062.1 (world = 100)$5,19673 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10082.7 (world = 100)
Brazil1980$1,45393 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10052.1 (world = 100)$5,54370 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 10088.1 (world = 100)
Brazil1981$1,80986 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10064.6 (world = 100)$5,18573 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10082.3 (world = 100)
Brazil1982$1,93682 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 10070.9 (world = 100)$5,11073 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 10082.3 (world = 100)
Brazil1983$1,33396 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 10048.5 (world = 100)$4,85175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 10077.3 (world = 100)
Brazil1984$1,32994 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 10047.9 (world = 100)$5,00276 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10077.6 (world = 100)
Brazil1985$1,38993 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 10049.6 (world = 100)$5,28175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 10080.5 (world = 100)
Brazil1986$1,63786 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 10051.6 (world = 100)$5,56175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 10083.7 (world = 100)
Brazil1987$1,76087 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10050.0 (world = 100)$5,64474 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 10083.5 (world = 100)
Brazil1988$1,92887 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 10049.8 (world = 100)$5,53475 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 10079.7 (world = 100)
Brazil1989$2,57571 of 179 · highest-to-lowest60.7 / 10064.8 (world = 100)$5,60576 of 179 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 10079.3 (world = 100)
Brazil1990$2,74184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.5 / 10063.2 (world = 100)$5,26690 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 10073.6 (world = 100)
Brazil1991$2,49988 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10055.8 (world = 100)$5,21387 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 10073.2 (world = 100)
Brazil1992$2,34792 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 10049.7 (world = 100)$5,06388 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 10070.8 (world = 100)
Brazil1993$2,58386 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10054.5 (world = 100)$5,20687 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 10072.6 (world = 100)
Brazil1994$3,61676 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 10072.6 (world = 100)$5,40883 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 10074.1 (world = 100)
Brazil1995$4,75769 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10087.5 (world = 100)$5,53284 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.5 / 10074.7 (world = 100)
Brazil1996$5,17969 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10094.6 (world = 100)$5,56986 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10073.6 (world = 100)
Brazil1997$5,29968 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 10098.6 (world = 100)$5,67386 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10073.2 (world = 100)
Brazil1998$5,10669 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 10096.9 (world = 100)$5,60987 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 10071.4 (world = 100)
Brazil1999$3,49486 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10064.7 (world = 100)$5,55386 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10069.2 (world = 100)
Brazil2000$3,76786 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 10068.6 (world = 100)$5,71887 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 10069.1 (world = 100)
Brazil2001$3,17689 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 10059.0 (world = 100)$5,72290 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 10068.7 (world = 100)
Brazil2002$2,85694 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10051.6 (world = 100)$5,82490 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 10069.3 (world = 100)
Brazil2003$3,09195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10050.5 (world = 100)$5,82293 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 10068.1 (world = 100)
Brazil2004$3,66494 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10053.8 (world = 100)$6,08893 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 10069.1 (world = 100)
Brazil2005$4,82891 of 208 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10066.3 (world = 100)$6,21495 of 208 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10068.7 (world = 100)
Brazil2006$5,93486 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 10076.1 (world = 100)$6,39295 of 208 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10068.5 (world = 100)
Brazil2007$7,41082 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 10085.3 (world = 100)$6,71295 of 208 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 10069.8 (world = 100)
Brazil2008$8,90883 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 10094.6 (world = 100)$6,98795 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 10072.2 (world = 100)
Brazil2009$8,67978 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 10098.4 (world = 100)$6,91694 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 10073.4 (world = 100)
Brazil2010$11,40374 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100119.5 (world = 100)$7,37493 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 10075.9 (world = 100)
Brazil2011$13,39772 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100127.8 (world = 100)$7,60594 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 10076.8 (world = 100)
Brazil2012$12,52277 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100118.5 (world = 100)$7,68995 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 10076.5 (world = 100)
Brazil2013$12,45979 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100115.9 (world = 100)$7,85695 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 10077.0 (world = 100)
Brazil2014$12,27580 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100112.6 (world = 100)$7,83294 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 10075.4 (world = 100)
Brazil2015$8,93689 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 10087.7 (world = 100)$7,49598 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 10070.8 (world = 100)
Brazil2016$8,83687 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 10086.4 (world = 100)$7,19499 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10066.9 (world = 100)
Brazil2017$10,08184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 10093.6 (world = 100)$7,236100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 10065.8 (world = 100)
Brazil2018$9,30190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 10082.3 (world = 100)$7,31599 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10065.2 (world = 100)
Brazil2019$9,03092 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 10079.6 (world = 100)$7,356100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 10064.5 (world = 100)
Brazil2020$7,07496 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 10064.5 (world = 100)$7,07496 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 10064.5 (world = 100)
Brazil2021$7,97398 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 10064.2 (world = 100)$7,38098 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 10063.8 (world = 100)
Brazil2022$9,28197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10072.5 (world = 100)$7,57597 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10063.9 (world = 100)
Brazil2023$10,37896 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 10078.3 (world = 100)$7,79099 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10064.4 (world = 100)
Brazil2024$10,31197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 10075.4 (world = 100)$8,02399 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 10065.1 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

South America$9,9682024
World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Real GDP growth across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024148.83.5-1.7-6.91971198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

11.3% → -4.4%

Average annual rate: +5.2%
Integration1990–2010

-4.4% → 7.5%

Average annual rate: +2.7%
Current era2010–2024

7.5% → 3.4%

Average annual rate: +1.7%
Real GDP growth3.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP-per-person growth3.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Implicit GDP deflator134.32024 · Published series · World rank 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil1970Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailableSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable0.0177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100
Brazil197111.3%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+7.1 pp vs world8.6%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+6.5 pp vs world0.0177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100
Brazil197211.9%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+6.6 pp vs world9.2%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+5.9 pp vs world0.0177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100
Brazil197314.0%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+7.5 pp vs world11.2%12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+6.9 pp vs world0.0177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100
Brazil19748.2%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+6.0 pp vs world5.6%43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+5.4 pp vs world0.0177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100
Brazil19755.2%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+4.4 pp vs world2.7%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+3.7 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil197610.3%37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.7 / 100+5.1 pp vs world7.7%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+4.3 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19774.9%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world2.5%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19785.0%98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world2.5%109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-0.1 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19796.8%51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.8 / 100+2.7 pp vs world4.3%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19809.2%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+7.3 pp vs world6.7%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100+6.6 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil1981-4.2%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-6.2 pp vs world-6.5%157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-6.6 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19820.8%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100+0.4 pp vs world-1.4%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100-0.1 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil1983-2.9%147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest17.5 / 100-5.8 pp vs world-5.1%145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest18.6 / 100-6.1 pp vs world0.0176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100
Brazil19845.4%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100+0.7 pp vs world3.1%68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.1 / 100+0.3 pp vs world0.0175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil19857.8%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+4.3 pp vs world5.6%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+3.9 pp vs world0.0175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil19867.5%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+4.3 pp vs world5.3%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+4.0 pp vs world0.0175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil19873.5%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100-0.1 pp vs world1.5%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-0.3 pp vs world0.0175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil1988-0.1%151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-4.6 pp vs world-2.0%147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest17.5 / 100-4.6 pp vs world0.0175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil19893.2%107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world1.3%98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100-0.6 pp vs world0.0176 of 179 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100
Brazil1990-4.4%167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-7.4 pp vs world-6.0%168 of 179 · highest-to-lowest6.2 / 100-7.3 pp vs world0.0196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest4.9 / 100
Brazil19910.7%126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-0.5 pp vs world-1.0%115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest44.4 / 100-0.5 pp vs world0.0194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.9 / 100
Brazil1992-1.3%152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world-2.9%148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest28.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world0.0195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.4 / 100
Brazil19934.5%65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+2.8 pp vs world2.8%70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100+2.6 pp vs world0.4190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest7.8 / 100
Brazil19945.5%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.2 pp vs world3.9%63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.8 / 100+2.1 pp vs world8.6166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100
Brazil19953.9%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world2.3%105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.3 / 100+0.7 pp vs world15.3162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100
Brazil19962.2%150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world0.7%148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest28.3 / 100-1.4 pp vs world18.1159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.9 / 100
Brazil19973.4%131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world1.9%125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100-0.6 pp vs world19.5161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100
Brazil19980.3%166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100-2.5 pp vs world-1.1%165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.0 / 100-2.6 pp vs world20.5163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.0 / 100
Brazil19990.5%161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-3.1 pp vs world-1.0%161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-3.2 pp vs world22.1167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100
Brazil20004.4%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100-0.1 pp vs world3.0%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100-0.1 pp vs world23.4167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100
Brazil20011.4%146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest29.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world0.1%145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest29.8 / 100-0.7 pp vs world25.3167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100
Brazil20023.1%107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100+0.8 pp vs world1.8%98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world27.8167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100
Brazil20031.1%164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-1.9 pp vs world-0.0%162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100-1.7 pp vs world31.7162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100
Brazil20045.8%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+1.3 pp vs world4.6%77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.9 / 100+1.5 pp vs world34.1162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100
Brazil20053.2%138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest33.2 / 100-0.8 pp vs world2.1%132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world36.7167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100
Brazil20064.0%147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-0.5 pp vs world2.9%129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world39.2167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100
Brazil20076.1%97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world5.0%81 of 208 · highest-to-lowest61.4 / 100+2.0 pp vs world41.7171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest17.9 / 100
Brazil20085.1%78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest62.8 / 100+3.1 pp vs world4.1%68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+3.4 pp vs world45.4172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100
Brazil2009-0.1%108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+1.3 pp vs world-1.0%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+1.6 pp vs world48.7175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100
Brazil20107.5%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+3.1 pp vs world6.6%36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+3.5 pp vs world52.8177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100
Brazil20114.0%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+0.7 pp vs world3.1%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100+1.1 pp vs world57.2181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100
Brazil20121.9%125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-0.8 pp vs world1.1%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100-0.4 pp vs world61.7181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100
Brazil20133.0%112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100+0.2 pp vs world2.2%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+0.6 pp vs world66.3179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100
Brazil20140.5%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-2.6 pp vs world-0.3%180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world71.5175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100
Brazil2015-3.5%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-6.7 pp vs world-4.3%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world76.9170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100
Brazil2016-3.3%200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.8 / 100-6.0 pp vs world-4.0%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-5.6 pp vs world83.2158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100
Brazil20171.3%166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.1 pp vs world0.6%158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.7 pp vs world86.2170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100
Brazil20181.8%157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.5 pp vs world1.1%142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-1.0 pp vs world90.1169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.6 / 100
Brazil20191.2%158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.4 pp vs world0.6%148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.7 / 100-1.0 pp vs world93.9177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100
Brazil2020-3.3%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world-3.8%87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 100+0.0 pp vs world100.01 of 210 · highest-to-lowest100.0 / 100
Brazil20214.8%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100-1.7 pp vs world4.3%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-1.2 pp vs world113.042 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100
Brazil20223.0%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world2.6%115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 100+0.2 pp vs world122.755 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100
Brazil20233.2%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100+0.3 pp vs world2.8%75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.6 / 100+0.8 pp vs world129.155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100
Brazil20243.4%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+0.6 pp vs world3.0%75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.6 / 100+1.1 pp vs world134.356 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

South America2.6%2024
World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Final Consumption across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202491.286.381.576.671.71970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

80.4% → 78.8%

Percentage-point change: -1.6 pp
Integration1990–2010

78.8% → 79.2%

Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp
Current era2010–2024

79.2% → 82.7%

Percentage-point change: +3.5 pp
Final consumption82.7%2024 · Published series · World rank 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Household consumption64.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Government consumption18.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Domestic demand99.7%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil197080.4%91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100+7.7 pp vs world69.0%76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+11.9 pp vs world11.5%120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-4.1 pp vs world99.6%126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest29.0 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil197180.4%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+7.4 pp vs world69.3%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100+12.3 pp vs world11.1%129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-4.7 pp vs world100.6%115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest35.2 / 100+0.2 pp vs world
Brazil197280.4%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100+7.5 pp vs world69.6%71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.2 / 100+12.8 pp vs world10.8%133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-5.1 pp vs world101.1%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil197379.9%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100+8.2 pp vs world69.9%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+14.0 pp vs world10.0%139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-5.6 pp vs world101.1%106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest40.3 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil197481.5%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+9.8 pp vs world72.3%57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.2 / 100+16.6 pp vs world9.3%147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-6.7 pp vs world105.0%86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100+4.7 pp vs world
Brazil197578.6%98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+4.9 pp vs world68.3%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+11.7 pp vs world10.3%144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.8 / 100-6.6 pp vs world103.3%105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100+2.8 pp vs world
Brazil197679.7%92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100+6.8 pp vs world69.2%66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.1 / 100+13.1 pp vs world10.5%138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.2 / 100-6.1 pp vs world101.8%112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest36.9 / 100+0.9 pp vs world
Brazil197779.1%91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100+6.2 pp vs world69.6%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+13.4 pp vs world9.5%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-7.1 pp vs world100.3%119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil197878.6%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100+6.0 pp vs world68.9%72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.7 / 100+12.9 pp vs world9.7%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-6.8 pp vs world100.7%120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil197979.4%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100+6.8 pp vs world69.4%60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100+13.4 pp vs world9.9%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-6.5 pp vs world101.5%108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil198091.2%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+18.1 pp vs world82.2%32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100+25.7 pp vs world9.0%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-7.6 pp vs world117.3%43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+16.2 pp vs world
Brazil198178.2%113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.7 / 100+4.8 pp vs world67.0%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+10.5 pp vs world11.1%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-5.6 pp vs world99.5%140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.0 / 100-1.4 pp vs world
Brazil198279.4%110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 100+4.8 pp vs world68.8%72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.7 / 100+11.4 pp vs world10.6%148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest16.5 / 100-6.6 pp vs world99.5%133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-1.4 pp vs world
Brazil198381.8%95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100+6.8 pp vs world72.5%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+14.6 pp vs world9.3%153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest13.6 / 100-7.7 pp vs world97.4%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-3.4 pp vs world
Brazil198479.4%99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100+5.1 pp vs world70.9%60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100+13.2 pp vs world8.5%156 of 177 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-8.1 pp vs world94.3%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-6.5 pp vs world
Brazil198576.2%119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world66.1%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100+8.0 pp vs world9.9%155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest12.5 / 100-6.7 pp vs world94.5%143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.3 / 100-6.1 pp vs world
Brazil198678.9%101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100+3.7 pp vs world68.2%71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.2 / 100+9.9 pp vs world10.7%143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world97.2%135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100-3.5 pp vs world
Brazil198774.8%129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest27.7 / 100-0.3 pp vs world62.6%97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 100+4.5 pp vs world12.2%125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-4.7 pp vs world96.2%138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.2 / 100-4.4 pp vs world
Brazil198872.3%136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest23.7 / 100-2.0 pp vs world59.7%102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100+1.9 pp vs world12.6%123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.7 / 100-3.9 pp vs world94.2%147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-6.5 pp vs world
Brazil198972.3%133 of 179 · highest-to-lowest25.8 / 100-1.8 pp vs world57.9%112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100+0.2 pp vs world14.4%99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100-2.0 pp vs world96.1%139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-4.2 pp vs world
Brazil199078.8%113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 100+4.0 pp vs world61.1%113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100+3.0 pp vs world17.7%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100+1.1 pp vs world98.0%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-2.6 pp vs world
Brazil199183.2%96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100+8.1 pp vs world64.5%102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100+6.3 pp vs world18.8%81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world99.4%136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest33.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil199282.5%102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100+7.3 pp vs world64.6%98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+6.2 pp vs world17.9%86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest58.3 / 100+1.1 pp vs world97.8%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-2.1 pp vs world
Brazil199382.2%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+6.6 pp vs world63.5%108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 100+4.7 pp vs world18.7%81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+2.0 pp vs world98.8%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil199482.4%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100+6.9 pp vs world63.3%102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100+4.4 pp vs world19.0%70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.2 / 100+2.5 pp vs world99.9%129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil199584.6%79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+9.7 pp vs world63.7%110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100+5.2 pp vs world20.9%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+4.5 pp vs world101.9%119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest42.2 / 100+2.5 pp vs world
Brazil199684.9%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+9.9 pp vs world65.2%100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.5 / 100+6.4 pp vs world19.8%63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest69.6 / 100+3.5 pp vs world102.2%112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world
Brazil199784.8%87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100+9.8 pp vs world65.3%98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+6.2 pp vs world19.5%67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+3.6 pp vs world102.6%111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest46.1 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Brazil199884.2%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100+8.6 pp vs world64.1%106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest48.5 / 100+4.6 pp vs world20.1%61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+4.0 pp vs world102.4%128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest37.7 / 100+2.8 pp vs world
Brazil199984.5%88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+8.6 pp vs world64.7%107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100+4.9 pp vs world19.8%57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.5 / 100+3.7 pp vs world101.9%124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Brazil200083.4%89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+7.8 pp vs world64.6%102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100+4.9 pp vs world18.8%67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+2.9 pp vs world102.3%114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Brazil200183.5%94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100+7.0 pp vs world64.1%111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest46.1 / 100+4.0 pp vs world19.3%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world102.2%113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100+2.2 pp vs world
Brazil200281.7%104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100+4.9 pp vs world61.9%115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100+1.7 pp vs world19.8%55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.5 / 100+3.2 pp vs world99.2%131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest36.3 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil200380.9%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+4.2 pp vs world61.8%120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+2.0 pp vs world19.1%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+2.2 pp vs world97.8%146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest28.9 / 100-2.1 pp vs world
Brazil200478.7%117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100+2.8 pp vs world60.2%124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 100+1.1 pp vs world18.5%67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world96.6%151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.5 / 100-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil200579.4%111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100+4.0 pp vs world60.5%122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100+1.8 pp vs world18.9%55 of 207 · highest-to-lowest73.8 / 100+2.3 pp vs world96.6%149 of 207 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-3.0 pp vs world
Brazil200679.5%105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100+5.0 pp vs world60.4%121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+2.5 pp vs world19.0%51 of 207 · highest-to-lowest75.7 / 100+2.5 pp vs world97.3%140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil200778.8%111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100+4.9 pp vs world59.9%120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest42.2 / 100+2.4 pp vs world18.9%51 of 207 · highest-to-lowest75.7 / 100+2.5 pp vs world98.6%141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest32.0 / 100-0.6 pp vs world
Brazil200878.6%114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 100+4.6 pp vs world59.7%126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.9 / 100+2.6 pp vs world18.8%55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world100.2%141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world
Brazil200981.6%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+5.6 pp vs world62.0%116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest44.7 / 100+3.9 pp vs world19.7%67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest68.3 / 100+1.7 pp vs world100.4%138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100+1.0 pp vs world
Brazil201079.2%116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.0 / 100+4.7 pp vs world60.2%127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+3.1 pp vs world19.0%67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest68.3 / 100+1.6 pp vs world101.0%126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.9 / 100+1.9 pp vs world
Brazil201178.9%117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest44.5 / 100+5.1 pp vs world60.3%127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+3.7 pp vs world18.7%71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world100.8%123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100+1.7 pp vs world
Brazil201279.9%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100+6.3 pp vs world61.4%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100+4.8 pp vs world18.5%79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world101.4%124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Brazil201380.6%109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100+7.0 pp vs world61.7%118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100+5.1 pp vs world18.9%70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world102.3%115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+3.3 pp vs world
Brazil201482.1%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100+8.6 pp vs world63.0%110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest47.6 / 100+6.3 pp vs world19.2%70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest66.8 / 100+2.3 pp vs world102.7%112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100+3.4 pp vs world
Brazil201583.7%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+10.0 pp vs world64.0%103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100+6.9 pp vs world19.8%60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+3.2 pp vs world101.2%124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100+1.7 pp vs world
Brazil201684.6%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+10.8 pp vs world64.3%100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest52.4 / 100+7.0 pp vs world20.4%50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.4 / 100+3.8 pp vs world99.6%135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100+0.4 pp vs world
Brazil201784.7%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100+11.3 pp vs world64.5%99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100+7.6 pp vs world20.2%49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.9 / 100+3.8 pp vs world99.3%131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest37.5 / 100+0.0 pp vs world
Brazil201884.5%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+11.7 pp vs world64.6%101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.9 / 100+8.3 pp vs world19.9%51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+3.5 pp vs world99.6%133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest36.5 / 100+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil201985.1%73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.6 / 100+12.1 pp vs world65.1%97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.8 / 100+8.8 pp vs world20.0%58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest72.6 / 100+3.4 pp vs world100.6%115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+1.2 pp vs world
Brazil202083.3%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+10.1 pp vs world63.1%106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100+7.7 pp vs world20.1%80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world99.4%134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil202179.9%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+8.0 pp vs world61.4%114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100+6.4 pp vs world18.5%87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest58.7 / 100+1.6 pp vs world99.4%132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest37.0 / 100+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil202281.5%98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100+9.5 pp vs world63.1%109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest48.1 / 100+7.5 pp vs world18.4%78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest63.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world99.6%137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest34.6 / 100+0.4 pp vs world
Brazil202382.0%94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 100+9.0 pp vs world62.9%106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100+6.5 pp vs world19.0%72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world97.7%143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest31.7 / 100-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil202482.7%86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100+9.5 pp vs world64.0%102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100+7.3 pp vs world18.8%77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest63.5 / 100+2.2 pp vs world99.7%127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+0.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

South America82.0%2024
World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Gross Capital Formation across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202428.625.121.618.114.61970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

19.2% → 19.2%

Percentage-point change: -0.0 pp
Integration1990–2010

19.2% → 21.8%

Percentage-point change: +2.6 pp
Current era2010–2024

21.8% → 17.0%

Percentage-point change: -4.8 pp
Gross capital formation17.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Gross fixed capital formation16.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Changes in inventories0.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 110 of 163 · highest-to-lowest
Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil197019.2%107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest39.8 / 100-8.6 pp vs world18.5%103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.0 / 100-4.3 pp vs world0.6%95 of 137 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100-4.2 pp vs world
Brazil197120.2%105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100-7.2 pp vs world20.0%95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100-3.2 pp vs world0.2%102 of 137 · highest-to-lowest25.7 / 100-4.0 pp vs world
Brazil197220.6%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-6.7 pp vs world20.0%99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest44.3 / 100-6.5 pp vs world0.7%84 of 138 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil197321.2%99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest44.3 / 100-7.4 pp vs world20.5%100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100-6.7 pp vs world0.7%90 of 140 · highest-to-lowest36.0 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil197423.4%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-5.1 pp vs world21.8%86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100-4.7 pp vs world1.6%85 of 138 · highest-to-lowest38.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world
Brazil197524.7%83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest53.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world23.4%86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100-3.0 pp vs world1.3%70 of 140 · highest-to-lowest50.4 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil197622.1%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-6.0 pp vs world22.3%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-4.5 pp vs world-0.3%110 of 139 · highest-to-lowest21.0 / 100-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil197721.2%112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest36.9 / 100-7.2 pp vs world21.3%102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-5.9 pp vs world-0.1%107 of 139 · highest-to-lowest23.2 / 100-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil197822.1%111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest37.5 / 100-6.4 pp vs world22.2%102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-5.3 pp vs world-0.2%107 of 139 · highest-to-lowest23.2 / 100-1.1 pp vs world
Brazil197922.2%110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest38.1 / 100-6.2 pp vs world23.3%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-3.9 pp vs world-1.2%121 of 142 · highest-to-lowest14.9 / 100-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil198026.1%87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.1 / 100-1.9 pp vs world27.2%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+0.1 pp vs world-1.1%127 of 143 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil198121.3%118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-6.2 pp vs world22.2%100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100-4.6 pp vs world-0.9%124 of 144 · highest-to-lowest14.0 / 100-1.6 pp vs world
Brazil198220.2%122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-6.1 pp vs world21.0%108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 100-5.2 pp vs world-0.9%121 of 145 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil198315.6%142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-10.3 pp vs world18.6%117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-7.1 pp vs world-3.0%133 of 146 · highest-to-lowest9.0 / 100-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil198414.9%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-11.5 pp vs world17.0%123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.7 / 100-8.3 pp vs world-2.1%131 of 147 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil198518.2%124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-7.5 pp vs world16.8%124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-8.0 pp vs world1.4%54 of 148 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil198618.2%122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-7.2 pp vs world19.1%109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest38.6 / 100-5.8 pp vs world-0.7%127 of 148 · highest-to-lowest14.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world
Brazil198721.4%98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest44.9 / 100-4.1 pp vs world22.3%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-2.6 pp vs world-0.9%131 of 151 · highest-to-lowest13.3 / 100-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil198821.8%97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest45.5 / 100-4.4 pp vs world22.8%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100-2.6 pp vs world-0.9%136 of 151 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-1.8 pp vs world
Brazil198923.8%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-2.4 pp vs world24.8%66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100-0.2 pp vs world-1.0%137 of 152 · highest-to-lowest9.9 / 100-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil199019.2%136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest33.8 / 100-6.6 pp vs world22.3%102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100-2.8 pp vs world-3.1%162 of 174 · highest-to-lowest6.9 / 100-3.8 pp vs world
Brazil199116.2%161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-9.0 pp vs world17.6%136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest33.8 / 100-6.7 pp vs world-1.4%156 of 172 · highest-to-lowest9.4 / 100-2.3 pp vs world
Brazil199215.3%168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest18.1 / 100-9.4 pp vs world17.9%130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-5.9 pp vs world-2.7%155 of 167 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-3.4 pp vs world
Brazil199316.7%152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.0 / 100-7.5 pp vs world18.9%121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest41.2 / 100-4.8 pp vs world-2.2%148 of 170 · highest-to-lowest13.0 / 100-2.7 pp vs world
Brazil199417.5%154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-6.9 pp vs world20.5%112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.6 / 100-3.2 pp vs world-3.0%155 of 170 · highest-to-lowest8.9 / 100-3.8 pp vs world
Brazil199517.3%160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest22.1 / 100-7.2 pp vs world20.3%112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.6 / 100-3.4 pp vs world-3.0%163 of 171 · highest-to-lowest4.7 / 100-3.9 pp vs world
Brazil199617.3%161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-7.2 pp vs world18.6%142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100-5.1 pp vs world-1.4%155 of 171 · highest-to-lowest9.4 / 100-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil199717.8%151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.5 / 100-6.6 pp vs world19.1%134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest34.8 / 100-4.4 pp vs world-1.4%158 of 172 · highest-to-lowest8.2 / 100-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil199818.2%162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-5.8 pp vs world18.5%147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest28.4 / 100-4.8 pp vs world-0.4%143 of 168 · highest-to-lowest15.0 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil199917.4%159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-6.5 pp vs world17.0%154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-6.5 pp vs world0.4%86 of 168 · highest-to-lowest49.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil200018.9%148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.9 / 100-5.4 pp vs world18.3%138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest32.8 / 100-5.4 pp vs world0.6%102 of 170 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil200118.7%153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-4.8 pp vs world18.4%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-4.9 pp vs world0.3%108 of 172 · highest-to-lowest37.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world
Brazil200217.4%162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-5.5 pp vs world17.9%152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.0 / 100-4.7 pp vs world-0.5%151 of 175 · highest-to-lowest13.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil200316.9%162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-6.3 pp vs world16.6%160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest22.1 / 100-6.2 pp vs world0.3%120 of 174 · highest-to-lowest31.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil200417.9%159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-6.0 pp vs world17.3%156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.0 / 100-5.8 pp vs world0.6%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil200517.2%173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest16.5 / 100-7.1 pp vs world17.1%166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-6.6 pp vs world0.1%134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil200617.8%170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.0 / 100-7.0 pp vs world17.2%167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest19.4 / 100-6.8 pp vs world0.6%106 of 180 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil200719.8%155 of 207 · highest-to-lowest25.2 / 100-5.5 pp vs world18.0%167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest19.4 / 100-6.3 pp vs world1.8%57 of 179 · highest-to-lowest68.5 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil200821.6%146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest30.3 / 100-3.8 pp vs world19.4%157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-5.0 pp vs world2.2%51 of 180 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+1.2 pp vs world
Brazil200918.8%155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest26.0 / 100-4.6 pp vs world19.1%148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest29.3 / 100-4.6 pp vs world-0.3%112 of 179 · highest-to-lowest37.6 / 100-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil201021.8%127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100-2.8 pp vs world20.5%132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest37.0 / 100-3.0 pp vs world1.3%66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100+0.3 pp vs world
Brazil201121.8%128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.9 / 100-3.4 pp vs world20.6%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-3.5 pp vs world1.2%72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest60.1 / 100+0.0 pp vs world
Brazil201221.4%128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.9 / 100-4.0 pp vs world20.7%127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100-3.8 pp vs world0.7%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil201321.7%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-3.7 pp vs world20.9%125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest40.4 / 100-3.7 pp vs world0.8%82 of 176 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil201420.5%140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest33.2 / 100-5.2 pp vs world19.9%138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-5.0 pp vs world0.7%77 of 175 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil201517.4%169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest19.2 / 100-8.4 pp vs world17.8%166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest20.7 / 100-7.2 pp vs world-0.4%151 of 176 · highest-to-lowest14.3 / 100-1.1 pp vs world
Brazil201615.0%186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.1 / 100-10.4 pp vs world15.5%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-9.4 pp vs world-0.6%153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest13.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil201714.6%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-11.3 pp vs world14.6%189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-10.6 pp vs world0.1%141 of 175 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil201815.1%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-11.2 pp vs world15.1%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-10.5 pp vs world-0.0%150 of 175 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil201915.5%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-10.9 pp vs world15.5%182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.0 / 100-10.4 pp vs world0.0%139 of 174 · highest-to-lowest20.2 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil202016.1%175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-10.2 pp vs world16.6%169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest19.2 / 100-9.4 pp vs world-0.4%140 of 173 · highest-to-lowest19.2 / 100-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil202119.5%149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest28.8 / 100-7.5 pp vs world17.9%156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-8.1 pp vs world1.6%60 of 171 · highest-to-lowest65.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil202218.1%160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest23.6 / 100-9.1 pp vs world17.8%156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest25.5 / 100-8.2 pp vs world0.3%131 of 170 · highest-to-lowest23.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil202315.8%180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-10.5 pp vs world16.4%171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest18.3 / 100-9.4 pp vs world-0.7%146 of 169 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil202417.0%167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest20.2 / 100-9.0 pp vs world16.9%161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest23.1 / 100-8.5 pp vs world0.1%110 of 163 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-0.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

South America17.4%2024
World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Trade openness across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202461.248.535.923.210.51970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

14.3% → 13.5%

Percentage-point change: -0.7 pp
Integration1990–2010

13.5% → 22.8%

Percentage-point change: +9.2 pp
Current era2010–2024

22.8% → 35.6%

Percentage-point change: +12.8 pp
Exports17.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Imports17.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Net exports0.3%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade openness35.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Brazil19707.2%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-4.1 pp vs world7.1%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-4.2 pp vs world0.1%58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest67.8 / 100+0.1 pp vs world14.3%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-8.2 pp vs world
Brazil19716.7%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-4.7 pp vs world7.7%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-3.7 pp vs world-1.0%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100-1.0 pp vs world14.4%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-8.4 pp vs world
Brazil19727.0%159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.7 / 100-4.8 pp vs world9.1%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-2.5 pp vs world-2.1%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100-2.3 pp vs world16.1%164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.9 / 100-7.3 pp vs world
Brazil19738.0%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-5.2 pp vs world8.9%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-4.1 pp vs world-0.9%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-1.1 pp vs world16.8%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-9.4 pp vs world
Brazil19747.8%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-8.2 pp vs world13.2%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-2.9 pp vs world-5.3%102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-5.4 pp vs world21.0%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-11.1 pp vs world
Brazil19757.2%165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.3 / 100-8.1 pp vs world10.9%166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.8 / 100-4.3 pp vs world-3.8%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-3.8 pp vs world18.1%166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.8 / 100-12.3 pp vs world
Brazil19767.0%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-8.7 pp vs world9.2%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-6.6 pp vs world-2.2%72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100-2.1 pp vs world16.2%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-15.3 pp vs world
Brazil19777.3%166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.8 / 100-8.5 pp vs world7.8%172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-8.3 pp vs world-0.5%59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100-0.2 pp vs world15.1%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-16.8 pp vs world
Brazil19786.7%167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.2 / 100-8.8 pp vs world7.8%173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest2.8 / 100-8.0 pp vs world-1.1%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100-0.8 pp vs world14.5%172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-16.7 pp vs world
Brazil19797.3%166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest6.8 / 100-9.6 pp vs world9.2%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-7.9 pp vs world-1.9%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100-1.7 pp vs world16.5%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-17.5 pp vs world
Brazil19809.1%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-9.2 pp vs world8.9%172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-9.7 pp vs world0.2%40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+0.5 pp vs world18.0%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-18.9 pp vs world
Brazil198111.2%154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest13.6 / 100-6.8 pp vs world11.0%169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.1 / 100-7.4 pp vs world0.2%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+0.6 pp vs world22.2%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-14.2 pp vs world
Brazil19825.3%173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest2.8 / 100-11.7 pp vs world5.2%177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100-12.2 pp vs world0.1%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+0.5 pp vs world10.5%177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100-23.8 pp vs world
Brazil198311.7%148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest16.9 / 100-4.7 pp vs world9.2%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-7.6 pp vs world2.5%30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.6 / 100+2.8 pp vs world20.9%164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest7.9 / 100-12.3 pp vs world
Brazil198413.5%146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest18.1 / 100-3.4 pp vs world7.8%172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-9.3 pp vs world5.7%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+5.9 pp vs world21.3%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-12.7 pp vs world
Brazil198512.3%150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-4.2 pp vs world7.1%175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.7 / 100-9.5 pp vs world5.1%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100+5.3 pp vs world19.4%168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest5.6 / 100-13.8 pp vs world
Brazil19868.9%162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest9.0 / 100-6.9 pp vs world6.3%176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100-9.8 pp vs world2.6%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+2.8 pp vs world15.2%170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.5 / 100-16.7 pp vs world
Brazil19879.6%162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest9.0 / 100-7.0 pp vs world6.1%177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100-10.5 pp vs world3.4%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+3.5 pp vs world15.7%174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest2.3 / 100-17.4 pp vs world
Brazil198811.0%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-5.9 pp vs world5.7%177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100-11.5 pp vs world5.4%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+5.6 pp vs world16.7%174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest2.3 / 100-17.4 pp vs world
Brazil19898.3%168 of 179 · highest-to-lowest6.2 / 100-9.1 pp vs world5.0%178 of 179 · highest-to-lowest0.6 / 100-12.8 pp vs world3.3%40 of 179 · highest-to-lowest78.1 / 100+3.6 pp vs world13.3%177 of 179 · highest-to-lowest1.1 / 100-21.9 pp vs world
Brazil19907.6%195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.4 / 100-11.4 pp vs world6.0%204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-13.2 pp vs world1.6%54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest74.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world13.5%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-24.6 pp vs world
Brazil19918.4%193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest6.3 / 100-10.2 pp vs world7.8%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-10.8 pp vs world0.6%57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+0.6 pp vs world16.2%201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-21.1 pp vs world
Brazil199210.5%183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest11.2 / 100-9.3 pp vs world8.3%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-11.1 pp vs world2.2%48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest77.1 / 100+1.9 pp vs world18.8%198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest3.9 / 100-20.4 pp vs world
Brazil199310.2%186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest9.8 / 100-8.6 pp vs world9.0%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-9.3 pp vs world1.2%58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+0.7 pp vs world19.2%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-18.0 pp vs world
Brazil19949.3%195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.4 / 100-10.2 pp vs world9.1%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-9.9 pp vs world0.1%75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100-0.3 pp vs world18.4%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-20.0 pp vs world
Brazil19957.5%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-13.1 pp vs world9.5%201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-10.7 pp vs world-1.9%84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.5 / 100-2.4 pp vs world17.0%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-23.8 pp vs world
Brazil19966.7%201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-14.4 pp vs world8.9%204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-11.8 pp vs world-2.2%92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100-2.6 pp vs world15.6%204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-26.1 pp vs world
Brazil19977.0%201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-15.0 pp vs world9.6%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-11.9 pp vs world-2.6%90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world16.6%204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-26.9 pp vs world
Brazil19987.0%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-14.8 pp vs world9.4%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-12.0 pp vs world-2.4%73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100-2.7 pp vs world16.4%204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-26.8 pp vs world
Brazil19999.6%194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.9 / 100-12.3 pp vs world11.4%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-10.2 pp vs world-1.9%78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world21.0%202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.0 / 100-22.4 pp vs world
Brazil200010.2%194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest5.9 / 100-13.4 pp vs world12.5%201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-11.0 pp vs world-2.3%88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100-2.4 pp vs world22.6%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-24.3 pp vs world
Brazil200112.4%190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest7.8 / 100-10.6 pp vs world14.6%198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest3.9 / 100-8.4 pp vs world-2.2%89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world26.9%198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest3.9 / 100-19.0 pp vs world
Brazil200214.2%188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest8.8 / 100-9.0 pp vs world13.4%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-9.6 pp vs world0.8%75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100+0.7 pp vs world27.6%198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest3.9 / 100-18.6 pp vs world
Brazil200315.2%182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest11.7 / 100-8.8 pp vs world13.0%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-10.8 pp vs world2.2%59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.7 / 100+2.0 pp vs world28.1%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-19.6 pp vs world
Brazil200416.5%177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.1 / 100-9.2 pp vs world13.1%203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest1.5 / 100-12.3 pp vs world3.4%57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world29.7%200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-21.5 pp vs world
Brazil200515.2%186 of 208 · highest-to-lowest10.6 / 100-11.8 pp vs world11.8%207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-14.8 pp vs world3.4%59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest72.0 / 100+3.0 pp vs world27.1%204 of 208 · highest-to-lowest1.9 / 100-26.6 pp vs world
Brazil200614.4%186 of 208 · highest-to-lowest10.6 / 100-14.3 pp vs world11.7%207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-16.4 pp vs world2.7%69 of 208 · highest-to-lowest67.1 / 100+2.1 pp vs world26.0%205 of 208 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-30.7 pp vs world
Brazil200713.3%192 of 208 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-16.3 pp vs world12.0%207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-16.9 pp vs world1.4%67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest68.1 / 100+0.6 pp vs world25.3%206 of 208 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-33.1 pp vs world
Brazil200813.5%192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.6 / 100-17.4 pp vs world13.7%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-16.5 pp vs world-0.2%68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.9 / 100-0.9 pp vs world27.3%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-33.9 pp vs world
Brazil200910.9%196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-15.4 pp vs world11.3%209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-14.4 pp vs world-0.4%73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world22.1%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-29.8 pp vs world
Brazil201010.9%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-17.7 pp vs world11.9%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-15.8 pp vs world-1.0%86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-2.0 pp vs world22.8%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-33.5 pp vs world
Brazil201111.6%201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.3 / 100-18.8 pp vs world12.4%209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-17.1 pp vs world-0.8%82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100-1.7 pp vs world23.9%209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-35.9 pp vs world
Brazil201211.9%198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.7 / 100-18.3 pp vs world13.2%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-15.9 pp vs world-1.4%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100-2.3 pp vs world25.1%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-34.2 pp vs world
Brazil201311.7%200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.8 / 100-18.4 pp vs world14.0%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-15.1 pp vs world-2.3%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100-3.3 pp vs world25.8%209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest0.5 / 100-33.4 pp vs world
Brazil201411.0%201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.3 / 100-18.7 pp vs world13.7%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-15.3 pp vs world-2.7%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100-3.5 pp vs world24.7%208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.0 / 100-34.0 pp vs world
Brazil201512.9%195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-15.2 pp vs world14.1%206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.9 / 100-13.5 pp vs world-1.2%86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-1.8 pp vs world27.0%205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-28.7 pp vs world
Brazil201612.5%195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-14.7 pp vs world12.1%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-14.3 pp vs world0.4%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100-0.4 pp vs world24.5%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-29.1 pp vs world
Brazil201712.5%196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-15.6 pp vs world11.8%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-15.5 pp vs world0.7%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100-0.0 pp vs world24.3%207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.4 / 100-31.1 pp vs world
Brazil201814.6%185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-14.4 pp vs world14.2%206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.9 / 100-14.0 pp vs world0.4%79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world28.9%204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-28.5 pp vs world
Brazil201914.1%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-14.0 pp vs world14.8%206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest1.9 / 100-12.7 pp vs world-0.6%94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 100-1.3 pp vs world28.9%205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest2.4 / 100-26.7 pp vs world
Brazil202016.5%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-9.6 pp vs world15.8%201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.3 / 100-9.5 pp vs world0.6%76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world32.3%196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-19.2 pp vs world
Brazil202119.1%166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-9.5 pp vs world18.5%198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.7 / 100-9.1 pp vs world0.6%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world37.7%194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-18.6 pp vs world
Brazil202219.6%171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest18.7 / 100-11.3 pp vs world19.2%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-10.9 pp vs world0.4%73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.6 / 100-0.3 pp vs world38.8%194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-22.2 pp vs world
Brazil202318.0%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-11.1 pp vs world15.7%202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest3.8 / 100-12.6 pp vs world2.3%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100+1.6 pp vs world33.7%199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-23.7 pp vs world
Brazil202417.9%178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-11.0 pp vs world17.6%198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.7 / 100-10.5 pp vs world0.3%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100-0.6 pp vs world35.6%200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.8 / 100-21.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

South America40.5%2024
World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 49.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing6.7%
1970–1990-1.0 pp1990–2010-5.3 pp2010–2024+1.9 pp

World specialization: 1.57×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities20.8%
1970–1990+1.3 pp1990–2010-8.8 pp2010–2024-0.3 pp

World specialization: 0.99×

Construction3.6%
1970–1990+2.3 pp1990–2010-0.8 pp2010–2024-2.7 pp

World specialization: 0.62×

Trade, restaurants and hotels12.1%
1970–1990-8.8 pp1990–2010+5.5 pp2010–2024-0.5 pp

World specialization: 0.84×

Transport, storage and communication7.1%
1970–1990+0.1 pp1990–2010+3.2 pp2010–2024-1.0 pp

World specialization: 0.73×

Other activities49.7%
1970–1990+7.6 pp1990–2010+6.1 pp2010–2024+2.6 pp

World specialization: 1.12×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

A one-hundred-percent stacked area chart showing the changing share of six industries.0%25%50%75%100%1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Broad industry structure over time

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

33.3% → 40.9%

Percentage-point change: +7.6 pp
Integration1990–2010

40.9% → 47.1%

Percentage-point change: +6.1 pp
Current era2010–2024

47.1% → 49.7%

Percentage-point change: +2.6 pp
How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing1.57×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities0.99×
Construction0.62×
Trade, restaurants and hotels0.84×
Transport, storage and communication0.73×
Other activities1.12×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table
Brazil197011.1%111 of 176 · highest-to-lowest37.1 / 100+1.7 pp vs world28.6%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100-2.3 pp vs world4.8%108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest39.5 / 100-1.7 pp vs world15.9%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100+1.8 pp vs world4.8%130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest26.7 / 100-3.1 pp vs world33.3%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+1.8 pp vs world
Brazil197112.2%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100+3.2 pp vs world31.7%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+1.2 pp vs world6.1%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100-0.5 pp vs world15.9%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world3.7%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-4.2 pp vs world30.5%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100-1.6 pp vs world
Brazil197211.9%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100+3.2 pp vs world31.4%39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+0.8 pp vs world5.9%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-0.8 pp vs world15.3%87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world4.2%142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-3.6 pp vs world31.4%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil197312.1%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100+2.9 pp vs world33.3%37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.7 / 100+2.5 pp vs world5.7%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100-1.0 pp vs world15.5%83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest53.4 / 100+1.5 pp vs world4.0%146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.6 / 100-3.7 pp vs world28.7%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100-2.9 pp vs world
Brazil197411.5%104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100+2.9 pp vs world34.5%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+2.8 pp vs world6.0%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-0.7 pp vs world15.1%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+1.0 pp vs world4.0%145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-3.7 pp vs world29.0%75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 100-2.5 pp vs world
Brazil197510.8%107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+2.5 pp vs world34.0%33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+3.3 pp vs world6.1%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100-0.7 pp vs world14.6%88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest50.6 / 100+0.5 pp vs world4.1%140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.0 / 100-3.5 pp vs world30.4%71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil197610.9%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100+2.9 pp vs world33.8%34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+2.9 pp vs world6.3%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100-0.5 pp vs world13.4%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-0.8 pp vs world4.5%138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.2 / 100-3.3 pp vs world31.2%71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100-1.3 pp vs world
Brazil197712.6%102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.3 / 100+4.8 pp vs world32.4%39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+1.6 pp vs world6.2%92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world12.7%118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-1.6 pp vs world4.6%136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest23.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world31.5%69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.6 / 100-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil197810.3%104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100+2.8 pp vs world33.2%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+2.7 pp vs world6.4%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100-0.5 pp vs world12.1%124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world4.9%132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world33.2%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+0.2 pp vs world
Brazil19799.9%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100+2.6 pp vs world33.1%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+2.3 pp vs world6.9%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+0.2 pp vs world11.3%132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.6 / 100-3.0 pp vs world5.1%125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-2.8 pp vs world33.7%59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil198010.1%105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.6 / 100+3.3 pp vs world34.1%33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+3.0 pp vs world6.8%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+0.1 pp vs world10.9%133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-3.3 pp vs world4.7%133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-3.1 pp vs world33.4%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100-0.3 pp vs world
Brazil198110.1%103 of 176 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+3.3 pp vs world32.9%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+2.2 pp vs world7.2%65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.8 / 100+0.7 pp vs world10.3%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-4.1 pp vs world5.1%127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest28.4 / 100-2.8 pp vs world34.5%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100+0.3 pp vs world
Brazil19828.7%113 of 176 · highest-to-lowest36.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world34.2%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100+4.3 pp vs world7.0%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+0.8 pp vs world9.9%143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.3 / 100-4.4 pp vs world5.4%124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-2.5 pp vs world34.8%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil198311.6%96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100+4.7 pp vs world34.9%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+5.5 pp vs world7.0%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+1.0 pp vs world9.3%152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-5.0 pp vs world4.7%137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.7 / 100-3.3 pp vs world34.9%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil198411.8%97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100+5.0 pp vs world34.7%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+5.5 pp vs world5.6%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100-0.2 pp vs world9.0%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-5.5 pp vs world5.6%122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-2.5 pp vs world32.6%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-3.3 pp vs world
Brazil198511.0%98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100+4.6 pp vs world36.8%24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+8.1 pp vs world5.4%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100-0.3 pp vs world8.5%158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-6.2 pp vs world5.0%130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest26.7 / 100-3.0 pp vs world33.1%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-3.5 pp vs world
Brazil198611.2%101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100+5.3 pp vs world37.0%18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+9.3 pp vs world6.8%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+0.8 pp vs world8.5%159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-6.2 pp vs world4.9%140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.0 / 100-3.1 pp vs world31.7%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100-6.1 pp vs world
Brazil19879.3%108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest38.9 / 100+3.9 pp vs world33.7%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+6.3 pp vs world7.3%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100+1.2 pp vs world7.3%165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest6.8 / 100-7.3 pp vs world4.7%145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-3.4 pp vs world37.7%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil19889.8%107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100+4.4 pp vs world33.0%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+5.7 pp vs world7.1%44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world7.5%166 of 177 · highest-to-lowest6.3 / 100-7.1 pp vs world5.0%144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.8 / 100-3.1 pp vs world37.7%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil19897.7%115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest35.2 / 100+2.4 pp vs world29.1%47 of 179 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100+2.2 pp vs world7.6%35 of 179 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+1.3 pp vs world6.8%171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest4.0 / 100-7.8 pp vs world4.8%142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest20.3 / 100-3.2 pp vs world44.1%24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100+4.9 pp vs world
Brazil199010.1%120 of 204 · highest-to-lowest41.4 / 100+4.9 pp vs world29.9%55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+3.3 pp vs world7.1%63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world7.1%182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-7.4 pp vs world4.9%167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest18.6 / 100-3.3 pp vs world40.9%39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.5 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Brazil199110.4%118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest42.4 / 100+5.6 pp vs world28.4%64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100+2.3 pp vs world6.7%63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.8 / 100+0.6 pp vs world6.6%191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest6.9 / 100-8.3 pp vs world5.0%161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-3.3 pp vs world43.0%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+2.9 pp vs world
Brazil19926.2%144 of 204 · highest-to-lowest29.6 / 100+1.9 pp vs world23.8%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-1.5 pp vs world6.7%60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+0.8 pp vs world6.8%189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest7.8 / 100-8.5 pp vs world5.0%164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-3.3 pp vs world51.6%8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+10.6 pp vs world
Brazil19935.6%149 of 204 · highest-to-lowest27.1 / 100+1.5 pp vs world23.6%91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest56.1 / 100-1.1 pp vs world7.1%50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world6.1%198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest3.4 / 100-8.9 pp vs world5.1%166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-3.2 pp vs world52.5%9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100+10.7 pp vs world
Brazil19947.9%126 of 204 · highest-to-lowest38.4 / 100+3.9 pp vs world23.3%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100-1.2 pp vs world8.9%22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+3.0 pp vs world6.5%197 of 205 · highest-to-lowest3.9 / 100-8.7 pp vs world5.6%157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest23.5 / 100-2.9 pp vs world47.8%19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+6.7 pp vs world
Brazil19955.8%143 of 204 · highest-to-lowest30.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world20.0%121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-4.5 pp vs world7.0%46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+1.3 pp vs world9.1%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-6.0 pp vs world5.8%154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest25.0 / 100-2.7 pp vs world52.2%10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100+10.2 pp vs world
Brazil19965.5%142 of 204 · highest-to-lowest30.5 / 100+1.4 pp vs world18.1%135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.6 / 100-6.1 pp vs world7.4%42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest80.0 / 100+1.7 pp vs world8.0%189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest7.8 / 100-7.0 pp vs world6.1%150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.0 / 100-2.4 pp vs world54.9%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+12.5 pp vs world
Brazil19975.3%139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest32.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world18.0%132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-6.1 pp vs world7.7%35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest83.4 / 100+2.2 pp vs world7.9%188 of 205 · highest-to-lowest8.3 / 100-7.2 pp vs world6.6%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world54.5%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+11.8 pp vs world
Brazil19985.4%138 of 204 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100+1.6 pp vs world17.2%135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.6 / 100-5.9 pp vs world7.9%40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world7.5%195 of 205 · highest-to-lowest4.9 / 100-7.6 pp vs world7.1%140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest31.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world54.8%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+11.4 pp vs world
Brazil19995.4%135 of 204 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100+1.8 pp vs world18.0%126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100-5.1 pp vs world7.1%44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+1.7 pp vs world7.6%190 of 205 · highest-to-lowest7.4 / 100-7.5 pp vs world6.7%147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest28.4 / 100-2.4 pp vs world55.2%7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+11.5 pp vs world
Brazil20005.5%134 of 204 · highest-to-lowest34.5 / 100+2.1 pp vs world19.8%114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest44.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world7.0%42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest80.0 / 100+1.6 pp vs world8.1%186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest9.3 / 100-6.9 pp vs world8.0%122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-1.1 pp vs world51.7%12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+8.1 pp vs world
Brazil20015.6%131 of 204 · highest-to-lowest36.0 / 100+2.2 pp vs world20.3%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100-2.2 pp vs world6.3%64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100+0.9 pp vs world8.3%186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest9.3 / 100-6.6 pp vs world8.2%119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest42.2 / 100-1.0 pp vs world51.2%12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100+6.7 pp vs world
Brazil20026.4%121 of 204 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100+3.0 pp vs world19.9%107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100-2.2 pp vs world6.5%61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.7 / 100+1.2 pp vs world7.7%191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest6.9 / 100-7.1 pp vs world7.9%124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 100-1.4 pp vs world51.5%14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+6.5 pp vs world
Brazil20037.2%115 of 204 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100+3.8 pp vs world22.3%92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100+0.2 pp vs world4.6%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world9.5%182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-5.2 pp vs world7.5%140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest31.9 / 100-1.8 pp vs world48.8%19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+3.7 pp vs world
Brazil20046.7%116 of 204 · highest-to-lowest43.3 / 100+3.2 pp vs world23.7%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world4.9%128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-0.5 pp vs world9.9%180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-4.8 pp vs world8.0%130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-1.5 pp vs world46.8%31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.4 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Brazil20055.5%123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100+2.1 pp vs world23.9%80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest61.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world4.6%140 of 208 · highest-to-lowest32.9 / 100-0.9 pp vs world10.8%170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.0 / 100-3.8 pp vs world8.0%129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest37.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world47.2%38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Brazil20065.1%124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest39.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world23.3%86 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 100-0.2 pp vs world4.3%151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest27.5 / 100-1.3 pp vs world11.2%167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest19.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world7.8%138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-1.5 pp vs world48.2%32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest85.0 / 100+4.4 pp vs world
Brazil20075.2%121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest41.2 / 100+1.7 pp vs world22.6%90 of 208 · highest-to-lowest57.0 / 100-1.0 pp vs world4.6%153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest26.6 / 100-1.2 pp vs world11.7%162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest21.8 / 100-2.5 pp vs world8.1%136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest34.5 / 100-1.2 pp vs world47.9%29 of 208 · highest-to-lowest86.5 / 100+4.3 pp vs world
Brazil20085.4%118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.2 / 100+1.7 pp vs world23.0%86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-1.1 pp vs world4.4%156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.8 / 100-1.3 pp vs world12.3%159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest24.0 / 100-1.9 pp vs world8.3%118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world46.7%37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Brazil20095.2%123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest40.8 / 100+1.4 pp vs world20.2%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-2.2 pp vs world5.4%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100-0.1 pp vs world12.7%153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest26.9 / 100-1.4 pp vs world8.1%136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest35.1 / 100-1.1 pp vs world48.3%38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.3 / 100+3.3 pp vs world
Brazil20104.8%123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest40.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world21.1%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-2.6 pp vs world6.3%85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100+0.9 pp vs world12.6%153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest26.9 / 100-1.4 pp vs world8.1%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-1.0 pp vs world47.1%43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Brazil20115.1%121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world20.9%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-3.4 pp vs world6.3%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+0.9 pp vs world12.9%145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest30.8 / 100-1.2 pp vs world8.1%124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest40.9 / 100-0.8 pp vs world46.7%45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+3.5 pp vs world
Brazil20124.9%122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world19.6%111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100-4.6 pp vs world6.5%72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100+1.0 pp vs world13.4%138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world8.1%128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.9 / 100-0.8 pp vs world47.6%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+4.4 pp vs world
Brazil20135.3%119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest42.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world18.5%117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest44.5 / 100-5.3 pp vs world6.4%80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.2 / 100+0.9 pp vs world13.5%135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.6 pp vs world7.9%132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest37.0 / 100-1.0 pp vs world48.5%37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+5.2 pp vs world
Brazil20145.0%121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100+0.6 pp vs world17.6%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-5.7 pp vs world6.2%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world13.6%137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest34.6 / 100-0.5 pp vs world8.0%136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest35.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world49.6%34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100+6.0 pp vs world
Brazil20155.0%119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest42.7 / 100+0.6 pp vs world16.8%122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.1 / 100-5.5 pp vs world5.7%111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100+0.2 pp vs world13.3%144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-1.0 pp vs world7.8%144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world51.4%28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100+7.1 pp vs world
Brazil20165.7%117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.7 / 100+1.3 pp vs world16.2%126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100-5.5 pp vs world5.1%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world12.9%154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest26.4 / 100-1.4 pp vs world7.7%144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest31.3 / 100-1.6 pp vs world52.5%27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+7.7 pp vs world
Brazil20175.3%118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.2 / 100+1.0 pp vs world16.8%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-5.2 pp vs world4.3%152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-1.4 pp vs world13.2%149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest28.8 / 100-1.2 pp vs world7.8%141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-1.5 pp vs world52.6%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100+8.3 pp vs world
Brazil20185.2%115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest44.7 / 100+1.0 pp vs world17.8%117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest44.5 / 100-4.7 pp vs world4.0%163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-1.7 pp vs world13.0%145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest30.8 / 100-1.2 pp vs world7.8%140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest33.2 / 100-1.4 pp vs world52.1%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100+7.9 pp vs world
Brazil20194.9%117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.7 / 100+0.7 pp vs world17.9%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-3.8 pp vs world3.9%167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-1.9 pp vs world12.9%150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.7 / 100-1.3 pp vs world7.9%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-1.5 pp vs world52.5%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100+7.9 pp vs world
Brazil20206.6%111 of 207 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100+2.0 pp vs world18.4%110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100-2.6 pp vs world4.1%160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100-1.7 pp vs world12.5%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-1.2 pp vs world7.7%130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100-1.6 pp vs world50.6%41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+5.0 pp vs world
Brazil20217.7%101 of 207 · highest-to-lowest51.5 / 100+3.1 pp vs world22.3%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100-0.0 pp vs world3.6%173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.7 / 100-2.2 pp vs world12.5%145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-1.4 pp vs world7.4%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-2.1 pp vs world46.6%52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.6 pp vs world
Brazil20226.7%106 of 207 · highest-to-lowest49.0 / 100+2.1 pp vs world23.0%85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100+0.2 pp vs world3.4%173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.7 / 100-2.3 pp vs world12.8%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-1.5 pp vs world6.5%153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-3.0 pp vs world47.7%45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+4.5 pp vs world
Brazil20236.9%104 of 207 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100+2.6 pp vs world21.9%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100+0.2 pp vs world3.4%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-2.4 pp vs world12.0%166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.5 pp vs world6.9%148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.7 / 100-2.7 pp vs world48.9%38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.3 / 100+4.8 pp vs world
Brazil20246.7%104 of 207 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world20.8%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world3.6%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world12.1%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-2.3 pp vs world7.1%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-2.7 pp vs world49.7%36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+5.2 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 14.1% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Brazil was 1.6 percentage points below the world value.

Latest share
14.1%
World specialization
0.90×
Latest year
2024
Manufacturing share of total gross value added across the full AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202432.127.122.117121970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Manufacturing share of gross value added

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

27.0% → 25.5%

Percentage-point change: -1.5 pp
Integration1990–2010

25.5% → 15.0%

Percentage-point change: -10.6 pp
Current era2010–2024

15.0% → 14.1%

Percentage-point change: -0.9 pp
Share of total GVA14.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share within parent activity67.7%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real manufacturing growth3.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world manufacturing1.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table
Brazil197027.0%15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+1.0 pp vs world94.4%14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+10.3 pp vs worldSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable1.0%15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil197128.0%14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+2.5 pp vs world88.5%47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+4.8 pp vs world11.8%25 of 176 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+8.7 pp vs world1.1%12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100-98.9 pp vs world
Brazil197228.8%15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+3.3 pp vs world91.9%24 of 176 · highest-to-lowest86.9 / 100+8.2 pp vs world14.2%24 of 176 · highest-to-lowest86.9 / 100+7.8 pp vs world1.2%10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil197331.0%10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+5.4 pp vs world93.1%14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+10.0 pp vs world17.0%13 of 176 · highest-to-lowest93.1 / 100+8.0 pp vs world1.6%8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil197431.7%10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+6.6 pp vs world92.0%30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest83.4 / 100+12.7 pp vs world8.5%49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest72.6 / 100+7.2 pp vs world1.9%8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil197531.2%6 of 176 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100+7.0 pp vs world91.9%27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest85.1 / 100+12.8 pp vs world4.9%60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100+7.8 pp vs world2.1%8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil197631.1%7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100+6.7 pp vs world92.1%26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest85.7 / 100+13.3 pp vs world11.7%40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest77.7 / 100+4.5 pp vs world2.2%8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil197729.6%12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest93.7 / 100+5.5 pp vs world91.5%30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest83.4 / 100+13.0 pp vs world3.1%101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-0.8 pp vs world2.2%7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil197830.4%10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100+6.3 pp vs world91.5%31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+12.5 pp vs world6.4%77 of 176 · highest-to-lowest56.6 / 100+2.9 pp vs world2.2%7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil197930.5%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+6.7 pp vs world92.0%21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.6 / 100+14.8 pp vs world6.8%75 of 176 · highest-to-lowest57.7 / 100+2.7 pp vs world2.2%7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil198031.3%4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.3 / 100+8.4 pp vs world91.7%24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest86.9 / 100+18.1 pp vs world9.3%38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+9.0 pp vs world2.1%7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil198130.0%5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+7.5 pp vs world91.3%23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest87.5 / 100+17.9 pp vs world-8.8%156 of 177 · highest-to-lowest11.9 / 100-10.2 pp vs world2.4%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil198230.9%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+8.8 pp vs world90.5%24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest86.9 / 100+16.4 pp vs world-0.1%103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.0 / 100+1.6 pp vs world2.7%7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil198330.2%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+8.5 pp vs world86.7%50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+12.7 pp vs world-5.9%155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest12.5 / 100-7.8 pp vs world1.9%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil198429.9%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+8.1 pp vs world86.0%51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+11.4 pp vs world6.3%72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.7 / 100+0.9 pp vs world1.9%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil198531.6%5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+9.9 pp vs world85.8%54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest69.9 / 100+10.2 pp vs world8.3%42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.7 / 100+4.0 pp vs world2.1%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil198632.1%5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.7 / 100+10.2 pp vs world86.8%38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+7.6 pp vs world11.5%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+9.5 pp vs world2.1%7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil198728.8%6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest97.2 / 100+7.0 pp vs world85.4%53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest70.5 / 100+6.0 pp vs world0.9%134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest24.4 / 100-3.6 pp vs world2.0%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil198828.6%12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+6.8 pp vs world86.8%43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+6.7 pp vs world-2.4%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-8.1 pp vs world2.0%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil198925.6%22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+4.2 pp vs world88.1%34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+8.3 pp vs world3.0%95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100+0.3 pp vs world2.6%7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil199025.5%33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest84.3 / 100+4.7 pp vs world85.4%62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+7.0 pp vs world-8.0%159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.7 / 100-9.2 pp vs world2.2%8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil199123.6%39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100+3.1 pp vs world83.2%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+4.5 pp vs world-11.1%178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest13.2 / 100-11.2 pp vs world1.7%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil199220.4%55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.5 / 100+0.6 pp vs world85.6%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+7.3 pp vs world-17.3%183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-16.8 pp vs world1.3%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil199320.7%47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world87.6%37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100+10.1 pp vs world0.3%108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 100+1.0 pp vs world1.6%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil199420.4%47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+1.2 pp vs world87.4%42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.9 / 100+9.1 pp vs world15.2%16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+11.7 pp vs world2.0%9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil199516.8%83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100-2.3 pp vs world84.1%63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest69.6 / 100+6.1 pp vs world32.4%5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest98.0 / 100+27.5 pp vs world2.0%8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil199614.9%93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.9 / 100-3.6 pp vs world82.4%70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest66.2 / 100+5.9 pp vs world0.1%148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.9 / 100-2.5 pp vs world2.0%8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil199714.8%93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest54.9 / 100-3.5 pp vs world82.4%68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+6.4 pp vs world2.5%139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world2.1%9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil199813.8%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-3.9 pp vs world80.2%73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest64.7 / 100+3.4 pp vs world-4.8%180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world2.0%8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil199914.2%91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-3.3 pp vs world78.9%80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.3 / 100+3.0 pp vs world-1.9%164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-5.2 pp vs world1.3%11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil200015.3%86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest58.3 / 100-2.1 pp vs world77.2%89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100+3.3 pp vs world5.7%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100-0.7 pp vs world1.5%11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest95.1 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil200115.4%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-1.0 pp vs world75.6%98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+3.0 pp vs world0.7%136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest33.8 / 100+1.5 pp vs world1.4%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil200214.5%90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.4 / 100-1.5 pp vs world72.7%103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100+0.6 pp vs world2.1%125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest39.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world1.2%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil200316.9%68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+1.0 pp vs world75.5%92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+4.0 pp vs world2.7%118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-0.8 pp vs world1.4%12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest94.6 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil200417.8%58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+0.5 pp vs world75.1%93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-1.5 pp vs world9.1%46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100-10.5 pp vs world1.4%13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest94.1 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil200517.4%58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest72.5 / 100+0.3 pp vs world72.7%100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world2.2%144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest30.2 / 100-2.1 pp vs world1.7%13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.2 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil200616.6%65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest69.1 / 100-0.5 pp vs world71.1%102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-1.4 pp vs world1.2%158 of 207 · highest-to-lowest23.8 / 100-5.4 pp vs world1.9%13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.2 / 100-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil200716.6%65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest69.1 / 100-0.5 pp vs world73.6%95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100+1.1 pp vs world6.1%81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100+0.1 pp vs world2.1%12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest94.7 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil200816.5%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100-0.3 pp vs world72.0%98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100+2.0 pp vs world4.1%75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest64.3 / 100+3.0 pp vs world2.3%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil200915.3%73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.6 / 100-0.9 pp vs world75.8%81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world-9.3%159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest24.4 / 100-2.9 pp vs world2.3%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil201015.0%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100-1.8 pp vs world70.9%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+0.1 pp vs world9.2%59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+0.2 pp vs world2.6%8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil201113.9%82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest61.2 / 100-3.0 pp vs world66.3%108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100-3.0 pp vs world2.2%132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100-2.1 pp vs world2.6%7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil201212.6%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100-4.2 pp vs world64.2%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100-5.3 pp vs world-2.4%160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100-4.8 pp vs world2.2%9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil201312.3%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-4.4 pp vs world66.4%103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-3.5 pp vs world3.0%93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100-0.1 pp vs world2.1%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil201412.0%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-4.7 pp vs world68.2%103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100-3.6 pp vs world-4.7%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-8.9 pp vs world2.0%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil201512.2%99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100-4.8 pp vs world72.9%87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 100-3.3 pp vs world-8.5%192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.6 / 100-12.1 pp vs world1.5%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil201612.5%94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.5 / 100-4.3 pp vs world77.2%69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.5 / 100-0.1 pp vs world-4.8%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-7.3 pp vs world1.6%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil201712.4%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-4.3 pp vs world74.1%85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world2.3%122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world1.7%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil201812.3%97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100-4.6 pp vs world68.9%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-6.1 pp vs world1.4%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-2.6 pp vs world1.4%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil201912.0%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100-4.4 pp vs world67.1%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-8.4 pp vs world-0.4%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100-1.8 pp vs world1.4%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil202012.3%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100-4.0 pp vs world66.9%110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100-10.7 pp vs world-4.7%106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100-2.3 pp vs world1.2%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil202113.9%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100-2.9 pp vs world62.4%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-13.0 pp vs world3.8%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100-5.2 pp vs world1.3%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil202215.1%68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world65.7%112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-6.2 pp vs world-0.5%153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-2.6 pp vs world1.6%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil202315.2%65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100-0.8 pp vs world69.2%102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100-4.2 pp vs world-1.3%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-2.8 pp vs world1.8%10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.7 / 100-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil202414.1%71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100-1.6 pp vs world67.7%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-6.4 pp vs world3.9%85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100+0.9 pp vs world1.6%13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100-98.4 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

South America1.01×
World0.90×