Source-specific country analysis
Poland Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | $28.28B | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $869 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 93.6 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | $31.31B | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 7.4% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | $955 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 95.4 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | $34.61B | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | $1,048 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 92.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | $40.97B | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | $1,229 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 91.2 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | $45.98B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 7.1% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | $1,367 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 91.2 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | $48.95B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 5.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | $1,441 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 87.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | $54.58B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 7.9% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | $1,591 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 91.1 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | $60.53B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 7.1% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $1,748 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 90.4 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | $68.55B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $1,962 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 87.2 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | $76.74B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | $2,177 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 85.5 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | $59.11B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | -6.0% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | $1,661 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 59.5 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | $56.02B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | -10.0% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | $1,560 | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | 55.7 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | $68.05B | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | -4.8% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | $1,878 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 68.8 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | $78.72B | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | $2,152 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 78.3 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | $78.83B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $2,136 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 76.9 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | $73.33B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $1,971 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 70.4 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | $76.34B | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $2,038 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 64.3 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | $66.02B | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 2.0% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $1,753 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 49.8 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | $71.09B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 4.1% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $1,880 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 48.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | $84.93B | 28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | $2,239 | 81 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 56.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | $66.30B | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -1.5% | 148 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | $1,742 | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 40.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | $85.98B | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | -7.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | $2,254 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 50.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | $94.83B | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $2,480 | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 52.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | $96.68B | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | $2,525 | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 53.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | $111.37B | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 5.3% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | $2,904 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 58.4 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | $142.84B | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 7.0% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | $3,723 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 68.5 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | $160.81B | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 6.1% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | $4,192 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 76.5 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | $159.89B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 6.4% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | $4,170 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 77.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | $175.28B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $4,573 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 86.8 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | $170.70B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $4,458 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 82.5 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | $172.95B | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | $4,521 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 82.3 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | $191.82B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 1.2% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | $5,015 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 93.1 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | $199.69B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 1.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | $5,224 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 94.5 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | $218.56B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 3.5% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $5,721 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 93.4 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | $256.27B | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $6,714 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 98.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | $307.00B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 3.3% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | $8,053 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | 110.5 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | $345.90B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $9,086 | 75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.3 / 100 | 116.5 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | $429.72B | 22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 6.8% | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $11,302 | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | 130.1 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | $535.61B | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $14,097 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 149.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | $440.89B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | $11,602 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 131.5 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | $478.11B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | $12,550 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | $527.85B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 5.3% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | $13,815 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 131.8 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | $498.15B | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $13,024 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 123.2 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | $518.18B | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | $13,544 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 126.0 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | $542.13B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 3.9% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $14,168 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 130.0 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | $480.05B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $12,545 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 123.2 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | $473.26B | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $12,369 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 120.9 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | $528.36B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 5.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $13,811 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 128.3 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | $594.62B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | $15,549 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 137.5 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | $602.68B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | $15,766 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 138.9 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | $605.91B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | -2.0% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $15,874 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 144.8 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | $689.17B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 6.9% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $18,117 | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | $695.61B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 5.3% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $18,122 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 141.5 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | $812.45B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | $20,960 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 158.1 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | $914.70B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 2.9% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $23,734 | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | 173.6 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$28.28B → $66.30B
Compound annual change: +4.4% CAGR$66.30B → $478.11B
Compound annual change: +10.4% CAGR$478.11B → $914.70B
Compound annual change: +4.7% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | $28.28B | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $123.01B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | $31.31B | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $132.13B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | $34.61B | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $138.31B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | $40.97B | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $144.09B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | $45.98B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $154.34B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | $48.95B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $163.51B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | $54.58B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $176.47B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | $60.53B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $188.98B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | $68.55B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $199.18B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | $76.74B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $206.84B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | $59.11B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $194.43B | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | $56.02B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $175.05B | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | $68.05B | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $166.70B | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | $78.72B | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $175.98B | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | $78.83B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $185.90B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | $73.33B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $192.66B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | $76.34B | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $200.81B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | $66.02B | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $204.74B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | $71.09B | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $213.20B | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | $84.93B | 28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $213.54B | 23 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | $66.30B | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $210.40B | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | $85.98B | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $195.64B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | $94.83B | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $200.56B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | $96.68B | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $208.05B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | $111.37B | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $219.06B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | $142.84B | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $234.29B | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | $160.81B | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $248.57B | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | $159.89B | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $264.38B | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | $175.28B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $276.60B | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | $170.70B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $289.59B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | $172.95B | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | 0.5 (world = 100) | $303.08B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | $191.82B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $306.82B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | $199.69B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $312.65B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | $218.56B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $323.67B | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | $256.27B | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $340.14B | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | $307.00B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $351.24B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | $345.90B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $373.02B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | $429.72B | 22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $398.24B | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | $535.61B | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $415.70B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | $440.89B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $426.57B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | $478.11B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $440.08B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | $527.85B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $463.21B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | $498.15B | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $470.22B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | $518.18B | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $473.43B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | $542.13B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $491.99B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | $480.05B | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $513.80B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | $473.26B | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $529.37B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | $528.36B | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | 0.6 (world = 100) | $556.65B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | $594.62B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $591.41B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | $602.68B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $618.50B | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | $605.91B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $605.91B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | $689.17B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $647.89B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | $695.61B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | $681.94B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | $812.45B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $683.64B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | $914.70B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.8 (world = 100) | $703.62B | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | 0.7 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
Europe$27.20T2024
Eastern Europe$4.58T2024
World$111.57T2024
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$869 → $1,742
Compound annual change: +3.5% CAGR$1,742 → $12,550
Compound annual change: +10.4% CAGR$12,550 → $23,734
Compound annual change: +4.7% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | $869 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 93.6 (world = 100) | $3,780 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 72.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1971 | $955 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 95.4 (world = 100) | $4,032 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 76.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1972 | $1,048 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 92.7 (world = 100) | $4,186 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 76.5 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1973 | $1,229 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 91.2 (world = 100) | $4,323 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 75.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1974 | $1,367 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 91.2 (world = 100) | $4,588 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 80.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1975 | $1,441 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 87.6 (world = 100) | $4,814 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 85.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1976 | $1,591 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 91.1 (world = 100) | $5,145 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 87.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1977 | $1,748 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 90.4 (world = 100) | $5,457 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 91.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1978 | $1,962 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 87.2 (world = 100) | $5,702 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 92.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1979 | $2,177 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 85.5 (world = 100) | $5,868 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 93.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1980 | $1,661 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 59.5 (world = 100) | $5,465 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 86.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1981 | $1,560 | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | 55.7 (world = 100) | $4,876 | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 77.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1982 | $1,878 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 68.8 (world = 100) | $4,601 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 74.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1983 | $2,152 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 78.3 (world = 100) | $4,812 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 76.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1984 | $2,136 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 76.9 (world = 100) | $5,037 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 78.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1985 | $1,971 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 70.4 (world = 100) | $5,179 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 79.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1986 | $2,038 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 64.3 (world = 100) | $5,362 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 80.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1987 | $1,753 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 49.8 (world = 100) | $5,436 | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 80.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1988 | $1,880 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 48.6 (world = 100) | $5,637 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 81.2 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1989 | $2,239 | 81 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 56.3 (world = 100) | $5,629 | 75 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | 79.6 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1990 | $1,742 | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | 40.2 (world = 100) | $5,529 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 77.2 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1991 | $2,254 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 50.3 (world = 100) | $5,128 | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 72.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1992 | $2,480 | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 52.6 (world = 100) | $5,246 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 73.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1993 | $2,525 | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 53.3 (world = 100) | $5,433 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 75.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1994 | $2,904 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 58.4 (world = 100) | $5,713 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 78.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1995 | $3,723 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 68.5 (world = 100) | $6,107 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 82.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1996 | $4,192 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 76.5 (world = 100) | $6,480 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 85.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1997 | $4,170 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 77.6 (world = 100) | $6,894 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 89.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1998 | $4,573 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 86.8 (world = 100) | $7,217 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 1999 | $4,458 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 82.5 (world = 100) | $7,564 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 94.2 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2000 | $4,521 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 82.3 (world = 100) | $7,922 | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2001 | $5,015 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 93.1 (world = 100) | $8,022 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 96.2 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2002 | $5,224 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 94.5 (world = 100) | $8,178 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 97.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2003 | $5,721 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 93.4 (world = 100) | $8,472 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 99.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2004 | $6,714 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 98.6 (world = 100) | $8,912 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 101.1 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2005 | $8,053 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | 110.5 (world = 100) | $9,213 | 76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 101.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2006 | $9,086 | 75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.3 / 100 | 116.5 (world = 100) | $9,798 | 76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 105.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2007 | $11,302 | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | 130.1 (world = 100) | $10,474 | 75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.3 / 100 | 109.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2008 | $14,097 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 149.7 (world = 100) | $10,941 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 113.0 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2009 | $11,602 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 131.5 (world = 100) | $11,225 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 119.2 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2010 | $12,550 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.6 (world = 100) | $11,552 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 118.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2011 | $13,815 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 131.8 (world = 100) | $12,123 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 122.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2012 | $13,024 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 123.2 (world = 100) | $12,294 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 122.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2013 | $13,544 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 126.0 (world = 100) | $12,374 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 121.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2014 | $14,168 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 130.0 (world = 100) | $12,857 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 123.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2015 | $12,545 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 123.2 (world = 100) | $13,427 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 126.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2016 | $12,369 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 120.9 (world = 100) | $13,835 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 128.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2017 | $13,811 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 128.3 (world = 100) | $14,551 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 132.4 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2018 | $15,549 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 137.5 (world = 100) | $15,465 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 137.7 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2019 | $15,766 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 138.9 (world = 100) | $16,180 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 141.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2020 | $15,874 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 144.8 (world = 100) | $15,874 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 144.8 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2021 | $18,117 | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) | $17,032 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 147.3 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2022 | $18,122 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 141.5 (world = 100) | $17,765 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 149.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2023 | $20,960 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 158.1 (world = 100) | $17,636 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) |
| Poland | 2024 | $23,734 | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | 173.6 (world = 100) | $18,257 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 148.1 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
Europe$36,4082024
Eastern Europe$16,0662024
World$13,6732024
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
7.4% → -1.5%
Average annual rate: +2.8%-1.5% → 3.2%
Average annual rate: +3.6%3.2% → 2.9%
Average annual rate: +3.4%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 1971 | 7.4% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 6.7% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 1972 | 4.7% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 3.8% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 1973 | 4.2% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 3.3% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 1974 | 7.1% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 6.1% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 1975 | 5.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 4.9% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 0.0 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 1976 | 7.9% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 6.9% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 1977 | 7.1% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 6.1% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 0.0 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 1978 | 5.4% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 4.5% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1979 | 3.8% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 2.9% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.0 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1980 | -6.0% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | -6.9% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 0.0 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 |
| Poland | 1981 | -10.0% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | -10.8% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 |
| Poland | 1982 | -4.8% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | -5.6% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.1 | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 1983 | 5.6% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 4.6% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.1 | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 1984 | 5.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 4.7% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.1 | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 1985 | 3.6% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 2.8% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.1 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1986 | 4.2% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 3.5% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.2 | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 |
| Poland | 1987 | 2.0% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 1.4% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.2 | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 1988 | 4.1% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 3.7% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.4 | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1989 | 0.2% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | -0.2% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 1.5 | 155 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 |
| Poland | 1990 | -1.5% | 148 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -1.8% | 132 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 7.7 | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 |
| Poland | 1991 | -7.0% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | -7.3% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 11.9 | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 1992 | 2.5% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 2.3% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 16.5 | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 |
| Poland | 1993 | 3.7% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 3.6% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 21.6 | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 1994 | 5.3% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 5.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 29.6 | 117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 |
| Poland | 1995 | 7.0% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 6.9% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 37.9 | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1996 | 6.1% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 6.1% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 44.7 | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 1997 | 6.4% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 50.9 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 1998 | 4.6% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 4.7% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 56.5 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 1999 | 4.7% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 4.8% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 60.0 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2000 | 4.7% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 4.7% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 63.6 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2001 | 1.2% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 1.3% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 65.6 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2002 | 1.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 1.9% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 66.8 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2003 | 3.5% | 114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 3.6% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 67.3 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2004 | 5.1% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 70.7 | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 |
| Poland | 2005 | 3.3% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 3.4% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 72.5 | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 2006 | 6.2% | 80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 6.4% | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 73.8 | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 |
| Poland | 2007 | 6.8% | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.9% | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 76.6 | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 |
| Poland | 2008 | 4.4% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 79.6 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 |
| Poland | 2009 | 2.6% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 2.6% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 82.7 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 |
| Poland | 2010 | 3.2% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 2.9% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 84.0 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 2011 | 5.3% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 4.9% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 86.6 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 2012 | 1.5% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 1.4% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 88.5 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 2013 | 0.7% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 0.7% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 88.7 | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 |
| Poland | 2014 | 3.9% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 3.9% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 89.1 | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 2015 | 4.4% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 4.4% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 90.3 | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 |
| Poland | 2016 | 3.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 3.0% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 90.4 | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 2017 | 5.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 92.0 | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 |
| Poland | 2018 | 6.2% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 6.3% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 93.1 | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 |
| Poland | 2019 | 4.6% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 4.6% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 95.9 | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 |
| Poland | 2020 | -2.0% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -1.9% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 2021 | 6.9% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 7.3% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 105.3 | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 2022 | 5.3% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 4.3% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 116.6 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 |
| Poland | 2023 | 0.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.7% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 128.1 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 |
| Poland | 2024 | 2.9% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 3.5% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 132.7 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
Europe1.3%2024
Eastern Europe3.1%2024
World2.8%2024
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
82.7% → 67.9%
Percentage-point change: -14.8 pp67.9% → 81.6%
Percentage-point change: +13.7 pp81.6% → 78.3%
Percentage-point change: -3.2 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | 82.7% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 62.9% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 19.7% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 103.1% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | 82.9% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 63.1% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 19.8% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 103.2% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | 82.8% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 63.1% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 19.8% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 103.2% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | 82.7% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 63.0% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 19.7% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 103.1% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | 82.5% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 62.8% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 19.7% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 103.0% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | 82.5% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 62.8% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 103.2% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | 83.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 63.9% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 19.9% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 103.6% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | 82.6% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 63.0% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 19.6% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 103.0% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | 82.1% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 62.5% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 19.7% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 102.6% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | 81.6% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 61.8% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 19.8% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 102.3% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | 82.3% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 62.7% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 19.6% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 104.3% | 94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | 90.4% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 69.6% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 20.9% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 105.8% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | 76.7% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 58.4% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.3% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 100.0% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | 79.7% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 60.0% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 19.7% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 100.6% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | 78.7% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 58.1% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 20.6% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 100.7% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | 77.6% | 110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 38.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 56.4% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 21.2% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 100.9% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | 76.9% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 56.1% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 20.8% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 101.2% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | 75.5% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 55.2% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.3% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 99.8% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | 71.5% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 52.7% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 18.7% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 98.9% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | 63.2% | 163 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 46.9% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 16.3% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 95.6% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | 67.9% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 46.9% | 184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 21.0% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 93.7% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | 82.7% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 58.2% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 24.5% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 102.8% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | 83.8% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 60.5% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 23.2% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 99.1% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | 83.7% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 61.9% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 21.9% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 99.4% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | 80.2% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 61.4% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 18.8% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 98.0% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | 78.0% | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 59.2% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 18.8% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 97.8% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | 79.6% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 61.1% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 18.4% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 101.4% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | 80.1% | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 62.1% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 18.0% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 103.9% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | 79.6% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 62.0% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 17.6% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 104.8% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | 80.4% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 62.6% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 17.8% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 105.9% | 88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | 81.8% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 63.8% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 18.0% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 106.5% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | 83.1% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 64.6% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 18.6% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 103.8% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | 85.0% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 66.4% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 18.6% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 103.6% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | 83.8% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 65.0% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 18.8% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 102.7% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | 82.4% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 64.1% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 102.9% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | 81.2% | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 62.9% | 114 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 18.3% | 60 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 101.3% | 123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | 80.4% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 62.0% | 111 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 18.5% | 58 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 102.4% | 114 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | 78.4% | 112 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 60.2% | 117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 18.2% | 57 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 72.8 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 103.8% | 113 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | 80.5% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 61.9% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 18.6% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 105.2% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | 80.2% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 61.5% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 18.7% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 101.0% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | 81.6% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 62.4% | 112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 19.1% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 102.4% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | 79.9% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 61.9% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 18.1% | 84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 102.3% | 113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.2 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | 80.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 62.0% | 116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 18.0% | 87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 100.8% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | 79.8% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 61.4% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 18.3% | 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 98.9% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | 78.8% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 60.5% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 18.2% | 83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 99.6% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | 77.1% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 59.2% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 17.9% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 97.9% | 150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | 77.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 59.1% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 17.8% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 97.1% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | 77.3% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 59.7% | 124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 17.6% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 97.2% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | 76.5% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 59.1% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 17.5% | 86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 98.0% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | 75.6% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 57.8% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 17.8% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 96.4% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | 75.6% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 56.7% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 18.8% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 94.4% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | 75.0% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 56.5% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 18.5% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 96.8% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | 76.3% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 58.1% | 126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 18.1% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 98.3% | 147 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | 76.6% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 57.6% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 18.9% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 94.3% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | 78.3% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 57.6% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 20.8% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 96.0% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
Europe74.5%2024
Eastern Europe73.5%2024
World73.2%2024
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
20.4% → 25.8%
Percentage-point change: +5.4 pp25.8% → 20.9%
Percentage-point change: -5.0 pp20.9% → 17.7%
Percentage-point change: -3.2 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | 20.4% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 21.8% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | -1.4% | 126 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | 20.3% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 21.8% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | -1.5% | 128 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 6.6 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | 20.3% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 21.8% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -1.4% | 122 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | 20.4% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 21.7% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | -1.3% | 123 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | 20.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 21.7% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | -1.2% | 125 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 9.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | 20.7% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 22.3% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | -1.6% | 121 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | 19.8% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 21.7% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | -1.9% | 126 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 9.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | 20.4% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 21.5% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | -1.1% | 124 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | 20.5% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 21.4% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | -0.9% | 117 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | 20.7% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 21.4% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | -0.6% | 118 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | 22.0% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 25.3% | 75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | -3.2% | 135 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | 15.4% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 19.1% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -3.7% | 137 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | 23.4% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.6% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 2.8% | 33 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | 20.9% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 20.6% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 0.3% | 73 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | 22.0% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 21.2% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 79 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | 23.3% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 21.8% | 75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 1.5% | 52 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | 24.3% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 22.5% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 1.8% | 38 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 74.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | 24.3% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 23.2% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 1.0% | 57 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | 27.4% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 23.2% | 77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 4.3% | 16 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | 32.4% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 16.8% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 15.6% | 1 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | 25.8% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 19.5% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 6.3% | 19 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 89.6 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | 20.1% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 18.2% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 1.9% | 54 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 69.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | 15.3% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 15.6% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | -0.3% | 136 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | 15.7% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 14.8% | 168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 73 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | 17.8% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 16.7% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 1.1% | 84 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 50.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | 19.9% | 135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 17.4% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 2.5% | 38 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 78.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | 21.9% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.3% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 2.5% | 35 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | 23.8% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 22.1% | 96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 53 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | 25.2% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 23.9% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 1.4% | 56 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 67.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | 25.5% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 24.2% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 1.3% | 51 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | 24.7% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 23.6% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 1.1% | 72 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | 20.6% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.4% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 0.3% | 115 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | 18.5% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 18.4% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 121 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 31.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | 18.9% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 18.1% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 0.8% | 80 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | 20.5% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 18.3% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 2.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | 20.1% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 18.9% | 149 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 1.2% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | 22.0% | 131 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.3% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 1.6% | 54 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 70.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | 25.4% | 95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 22.4% | 124 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 3.0% | 36 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 80.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | 24.8% | 110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 23.0% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 1.7% | 71 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 60.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | 20.8% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 21.4% | 122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | -0.6% | 125 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | 20.9% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 19.6% | 145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.8 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 1.2% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | 22.3% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 20.4% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 2.0% | 46 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 74.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | 20.8% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 19.5% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 1.3% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | 19.1% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 18.9% | 150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 0.2% | 111 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | 20.8% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 20.0% | 135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 0.8% | 74 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | 20.8% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 20.3% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 0.5% | 90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | 20.1% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 18.4% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 1.7% | 34 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | 19.9% | 144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 17.5% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 2.4% | 28 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | 21.4% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 18.6% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 2.9% | 31 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | 20.7% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 18.7% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 39 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | 18.8% | 144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 18.4% | 144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 0.4% | 81 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 53.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | 21.8% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 16.9% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 4.9% | 14 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 92.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | 22.1% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 16.5% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 5.6% | 15 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | 17.7% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 17.9% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 132 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | 17.7% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 16.9% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 0.8% | 62 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
Europe21.8%2024
Eastern Europe23.6%2024
World26.0%2024
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Poland is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
48.9% → 45.1%
Percentage-point change: -3.8 pp45.1% → 82.2%
Percentage-point change: +37.1 pp82.2% → 100.7%
Percentage-point change: +18.4 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | 22.9% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 26.0% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | -3.1% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 48.9% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | 23.0% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 26.2% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world | -3.1% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 49.2% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +26.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | 23.0% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 26.1% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | -3.1% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 49.0% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | 22.8% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 25.7% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | -3.0% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 48.5% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | 22.5% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 25.3% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | -2.8% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 47.8% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | 23.4% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 26.8% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | -3.3% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 50.2% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | 23.4% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 26.9% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | -3.5% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 50.3% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | 22.7% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 25.6% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | -2.9% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 48.3% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | 21.8% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 24.2% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | -2.4% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 46.0% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | 21.1% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 23.0% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | -1.9% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 44.1% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | 28.1% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 34.1% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | -5.9% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 62.2% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +25.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | 23.2% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 27.7% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | -4.6% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 50.9% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | 19.4% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 19.0% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 0.4% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 38.5% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | 17.2% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 17.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 34.2% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | 17.7% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 17.2% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 0.4% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 34.9% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | 18.3% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 18.6% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 36.9% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | 18.3% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 18.5% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | -0.1% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 36.8% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | 21.5% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 20.9% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 0.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 42.5% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | 22.9% | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 22.0% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 45.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | 19.2% | 123 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 31.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 16.4% | 156 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 42 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 35.6% | 148 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | 25.8% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 19.3% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 6.5% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 45.1% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | 21.2% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 22.9% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | -1.7% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 44.1% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | 21.3% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 19.9% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 1.4% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 41.3% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | 20.7% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 19.7% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 0.9% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 40.4% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | 21.3% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 19.3% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 2.0% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 40.6% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | 22.9% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 20.7% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 2.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 43.6% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | 22.0% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 23.4% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | -1.4% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 45.4% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | 23.3% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 27.1% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | -3.9% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 50.4% | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | 25.9% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 30.7% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | -4.8% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 56.5% | 136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | 24.0% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 29.9% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | -5.9% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 53.9% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | 27.1% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 33.5% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | -6.5% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 60.6% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | 27.1% | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 30.8% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | -3.8% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 57.9% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | 28.6% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 32.2% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | -3.6% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 60.8% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | 33.2% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 36.0% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | -2.7% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 69.2% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | 34.1% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 36.9% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | -2.9% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 71.0% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | 34.5% | 112 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 35.8% | 130 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | -1.3% | 82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 70.3% | 128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | 37.7% | 103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 40.0% | 114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | -2.4% | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 77.7% | 119 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.0 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | 38.5% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 42.3% | 106 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | -3.8% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 80.7% | 114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | 37.7% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 42.9% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | -5.2% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 80.6% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | 37.0% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 38.0% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | -1.0% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 75.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | 39.9% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 42.3% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | -2.4% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 82.2% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +26.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | 42.3% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 44.6% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | -2.3% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 86.9% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | 44.0% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 44.8% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | -0.8% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 88.8% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +29.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | 45.8% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 44.7% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 1.1% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 90.4% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | 46.2% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 45.8% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 0.4% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 92.0% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +33.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | 47.2% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 45.1% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 2.1% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 92.3% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | 49.9% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +22.7 pp vs world | 47.0% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 2.9% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 96.9% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +43.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | 51.7% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 48.9% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world | 2.8% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 100.6% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +45.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | 52.2% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 50.2% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world | 2.0% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 102.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +45.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | 52.6% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | 49.0% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world | 3.6% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 101.6% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +46.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | 52.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +26.3 pp vs world | 46.8% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 5.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 99.3% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +47.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | 57.0% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | 53.8% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +26.2 pp vs world | 3.2% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 110.9% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +54.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | 62.4% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | 60.7% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | 1.7% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 123.0% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +62.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | 57.9% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +28.8 pp vs world | 52.1% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 5.7% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 110.0% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +52.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | 52.3% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +23.3 pp vs world | 48.3% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 4.0% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 100.7% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
Europe88.4%2024
Eastern Europe76.0%2024
World57.1%2024
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 38.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
1970–1990-6.9 pp1990–2010-3.5 pp2010–2024-0.4 pp
World specialization: 0.69×
1970–1990+0.6 pp1990–2010-16.2 pp2010–2024-2.3 pp
World specialization: 1.08×
1970–1990-0.9 pp1990–2010-1.7 pp2010–2024-1.8 pp
World specialization: 1.16×
1970–1990+2.4 pp1990–2010+7.3 pp2010–2024-2.0 pp
World specialization: 1.18×
1970–1990+0.9 pp1990–2010+3.3 pp2010–2024+2.1 pp
World specialization: 1.19×
1970–1990+3.9 pp1990–2010+10.9 pp2010–2024+4.4 pp
World specialization: 0.87×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
19.5% → 23.4%
Percentage-point change: +3.9 pp23.4% → 34.3%
Percentage-point change: +10.9 pp34.3% → 38.7%
Percentage-point change: +4.4 ppHow to read specialization
World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Agriculture, forestry and fishing0.69×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities1.08×
Construction1.16×
Trade, restaurants and hotels1.18×
Transport, storage and communication1.19×
Other activities0.87×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | 13.7% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 40.9% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 11.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 9.4% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | 13.7% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 40.9% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 11.1% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 9.4% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | 13.7% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 40.9% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 11.1% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 5.4% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | 13.7% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 40.9% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 11.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | 13.7% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 40.9% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 11.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 9.4% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 19.5% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | 13.7% | 96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 40.9% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 11.1% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 5.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 19.5% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -13.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | 13.7% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 40.9% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 11.1% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | 13.7% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 40.9% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 11.1% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 9.4% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | 13.7% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 40.9% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 11.1% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.5% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | 13.6% | 90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.1 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 40.9% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 11.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | 13.8% | 86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 40.9% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 11.1% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 9.4% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.3% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | 13.8% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 40.8% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 11.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 9.4% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.5% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | 13.6% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 40.9% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 11.1% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 9.5% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 19.6% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -15.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | 13.5% | 86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 41.0% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 11.1% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.5% | 150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 19.5% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | 13.4% | 90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.1 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 41.1% | 14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 9.4% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 5.4% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 19.5% | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | 14.6% | 80 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 40.4% | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 11.0% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 9.4% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 19.3% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | 14.0% | 87 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.9 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 40.5% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 11.0% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 9.5% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 5.4% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 19.6% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -18.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | 12.2% | 92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 41.6% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 11.1% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 9.8% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 5.5% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 20.0% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -18.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | 13.3% | 87 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.9 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 41.5% | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 9.3% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 19.2% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | 13.1% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 41.5% | 12 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 11.4% | 13 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.2% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 5.4% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 19.4% | 149 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -19.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | 6.8% | 142 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 41.5% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 10.2% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 11.8% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 6.3% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 23.4% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | 5.7% | 152 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 37.4% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 11.4% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 12.2% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 7.0% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 26.2% | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | 6.2% | 143 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 30.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 33.6% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 9.2% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 13.5% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 8.0% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 29.5% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | 6.6% | 139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 34.0% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 8.1% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 16.1% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 8.0% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 27.2% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | 6.3% | 140 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 31.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 28.7% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 8.2% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 19.8% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 8.5% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.5% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | 6.5% | 135 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 29.6% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 8.6% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 19.6% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 7.0% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 28.6% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | 6.0% | 136 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 28.0% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 8.9% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 20.6% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 7.1% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 29.4% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | 5.2% | 141 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 31.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 26.7% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 9.1% | 18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 20.6% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 7.3% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 30.9% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | 4.5% | 145 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 25.6% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 9.8% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 20.9% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 7.3% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 31.9% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | 3.8% | 150 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 25.2% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 9.5% | 18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 20.7% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 8.1% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 32.8% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | 3.6% | 151 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 24.0% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 8.4% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 21.1% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 8.7% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 34.3% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | 3.7% | 151 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 22.5% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 8.3% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 21.4% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 9.0% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 35.1% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | 3.2% | 153 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 22.5% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 7.7% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 21.5% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 9.7% | 79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 35.4% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | 3.1% | 153 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 24.1% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 7.1% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 20.3% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 10.0% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 35.5% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | 3.8% | 144 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 29.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 25.5% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 7.5% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 19.5% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 10.4% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 33.4% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | 3.4% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 25.3% | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 7.7% | 39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 10.3% | 71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 33.6% | 107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | 3.1% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 25.3% | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 8.0% | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 19.5% | 39 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 81.6 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 10.3% | 62 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 70.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 33.7% | 106 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | 3.5% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 25.3% | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 8.2% | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 19.0% | 45 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.6 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 68 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 33.8% | 107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | 3.0% | 147 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 24.9% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 8.1% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 19.1% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 10.0% | 76 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 34.9% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | 3.0% | 144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 25.0% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 8.7% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 9.8% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 33.7% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | 3.3% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 25.3% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 8.5% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 19.1% | 50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 9.5% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 34.3% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | 3.6% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 25.3% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 9.3% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 18.7% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 9.1% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 34.0% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | 3.4% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 25.8% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 8.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 19.3% | 46 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 9.8% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 33.4% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | 3.6% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 24.5% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 7.9% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 19.4% | 46 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 9.9% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 34.7% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | 3.4% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 25.4% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 8.3% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 17.5% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 10.2% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 35.1% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | 2.8% | 147 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 26.1% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 8.8% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 17.6% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 10.5% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 34.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | 3.0% | 144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 26.7% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 8.0% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 17.3% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 10.6% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 34.5% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | 3.4% | 141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 25.2% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 7.6% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 17.9% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 10.9% | 50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 35.0% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | 2.8% | 143 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 24.5% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 8.4% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 17.4% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 11.4% | 41 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 35.5% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | 2.7% | 144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 24.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 8.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 17.2% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 11.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 36.1% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | 2.9% | 148 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 24.3% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 8.1% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 16.8% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 11.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 36.8% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | 2.6% | 151 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 25.7% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 7.0% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 17.3% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 11.2% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 36.3% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | 3.1% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 26.2% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 6.5% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 11.5% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 35.5% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | 3.0% | 139 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 26.2% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 7.1% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 16.0% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 11.5% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 36.2% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | 2.9% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 22.9% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 6.7% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 11.6% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 38.7% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 17.3% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Poland was 1.7 percentage points above the world value.
- Latest share
- 17.3%
- World specialization
- 1.11×
- Latest year
- 2024
30.9% → 31.4%
Percentage-point change: +0.5 pp31.4% → 18.4%
Percentage-point change: -13.0 pp18.4% → 17.3%
Percentage-point change: -1.1 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Poland | 1970 | 30.9% | 10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 75.6% | 106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 1.0% | 13 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 93.1 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1971 | 30.9% | 9 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 95.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 75.6% | 106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 7.4% | 55 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 1.0% | 15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1972 | 30.9% | 10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 75.6% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 4.7% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 1.0% | 14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1973 | 30.9% | 11 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 75.6% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 4.2% | 121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 1.0% | 16 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1974 | 30.9% | 12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 75.6% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 7.2% | 64 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 64.0 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 1.0% | 16 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1975 | 30.9% | 7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 75.6% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 1.0% | 18 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1976 | 30.9% | 8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 75.6% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 7.8% | 74 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 1.0% | 17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1977 | 30.9% | 8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 75.6% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 7.0% | 60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 1.0% | 17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.0 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1978 | 30.9% | 6 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 75.6% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 5.5% | 87 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1979 | 30.9% | 5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 75.6% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 4.3% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.9% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | -99.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1980 | 30.9% | 5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 75.6% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | -6.2% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1981 | 30.8% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 75.6% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | -10.7% | 164 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 0.6% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1982 | 30.9% | 5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 75.6% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | -4.6% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 0.8% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1983 | 31.0% | 5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 75.5% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 6.7% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | -99.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1984 | 31.1% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 75.6% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 7.7% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 0.9% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | -99.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1985 | 30.5% | 7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 75.5% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1986 | 30.7% | 7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 75.6% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | -0.1% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 0.7% | 21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.6 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1987 | 31.4% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 75.6% | 94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 7.5% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 0.6% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1988 | 31.3% | 4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 75.3% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 10.3% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1989 | 31.5% | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 75.9% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 6.0% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 0.6% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1990 | 31.4% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 75.7% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -35.4% | 176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.1 / 100 | -36.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1991 | 27.8% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 74.5% | 111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | -15.4% | 192 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.4 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 0.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1992 | 26.0% | 24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 77.5% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 73.1% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +73.7 pp vs world | 0.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1993 | 25.5% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 75.1% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 11.9% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1994 | 20.3% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 70.8% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 11.3% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1995 | 21.9% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 73.9% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 27.5% | 10 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1996 | 20.7% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 74.1% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -1.1% | 162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1997 | 19.9% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 74.5% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | -0.6% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 0.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1998 | 19.5% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 76.0% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.6% | 24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 1999 | 19.0% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 75.5% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.7% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2000 | 17.9% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 74.8% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2001 | 16.2% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 72.1% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | -1.3% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 0.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2002 | 16.0% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 71.1% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 2.1% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.5% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2003 | 17.5% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 72.3% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 12.5% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 0.6% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2004 | 18.7% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 73.7% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 15.2% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2005 | 18.6% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 73.4% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 5.7% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.4 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2006 | 18.9% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 74.4% | 89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 15.5% | 21 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 0.7% | 24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2007 | 19.1% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 75.3% | 88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 14.1% | 30 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2008 | 18.9% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 75.9% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 9.0% | 34 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 0.9% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.1 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2009 | 18.8% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 75.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 1.2% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2010 | 18.4% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 72.8% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 10.7% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2011 | 18.4% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 72.7% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 5.5% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2012 | 18.7% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 72.6% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 2.8% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2013 | 17.6% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 71.8% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | -3.7% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 0.7% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2014 | 19.1% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 75.0% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 11.7% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 0.7% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2015 | 19.9% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 76.3% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 7.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2016 | 20.7% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 77.4% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 5.3% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2017 | 19.2% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 76.4% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 1.9% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2018 | 18.8% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 76.7% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 5.7% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 0.7% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2019 | 18.9% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 77.5% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 6.4% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2020 | 18.4% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 75.6% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | -5.6% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.3 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2021 | 19.8% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 77.3% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | -0.8% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2022 | 19.8% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 75.6% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 12.3% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 0.8% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2023 | 18.6% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 70.8% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -0.6% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
| Poland | 2024 | 17.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 75.5% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 6.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 0.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | -99.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization
Europe1.19×
Eastern Europe1.10×
World1.11×