01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$84.87B2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 80 of 210

Real GDP growth2.8%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change

GDP per capita$29,6842024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted

Share of world GDP0.1%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator

Largest broad activity38.8%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities

Manufacturing15.7%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap +0.0 pp

Economic overview annual rank and index table35 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table

Lithuania	1990	$10.31B	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	$2,789	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	64.3 (world = 100)	0.0%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	$10.05B	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	-5.7%	170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	$2,715	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	60.6 (world = 100)	0.0%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	$8.09B	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	-21.3%	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-23.3 pp vs world	$2,189	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	46.4 (world = 100)	0.0%	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	$6.94B	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	-16.2%	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-18.0 pp vs world	$1,886	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	39.8 (world = 100)	0.0%	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	$6.40B	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	-9.8%	191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-13.1 pp vs world	$1,750	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	35.2 (world = 100)	0.0%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	$6.75B	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	3.3%	118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	$1,860	114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	34.2 (world = 100)	0.0%	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	$8.43B	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	5.0%	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	$2,342	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	42.8 (world = 100)	0.0%	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	$10.17B	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	8.3%	28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	$2,846	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	52.9 (world = 100)	0.0%	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	$11.29B	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	7.5%	32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	$3,182	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	60.4 (world = 100)	0.0%	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	$11.02B	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	-1.1%	177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	14.1 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	$3,129	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	57.9 (world = 100)	0.0%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	$11.55B	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	3.4%	132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	$3,300	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	60.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	$12.26B	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	6.5%	34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.9 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	$3,530	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	65.5 (world = 100)	0.0%	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	$14.28B	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	6.7%	34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.9 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	$4,146	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	75.0 (world = 100)	0.0%	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	$18.81B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	10.6%	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	$5,507	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	89.9 (world = 100)	0.0%	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	$22.74B	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.5%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	$6,734	68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.3 / 100	98.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	$26.12B	79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	7.7%	42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	80.0 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	$7,862	73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	65.2 / 100	107.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	$30.11B	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	7.4%	59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.0 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	$9,208	74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	118.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	$39.72B	76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	11.1%	22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	89.9 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	$12,293	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	141.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	$47.88B	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.6%	133 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	36.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$14,968	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	159.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	$37.49B	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	-14.8%	205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-13.4 pp vs world	$11,853	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	134.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	$36.65B	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.4%	177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	$11,831	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	124.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	$43.23B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.3%	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	$14,275	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	136.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	$42.73B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.4%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	$14,297	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	135.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	$46.29B	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.0%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	$15,649	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	145.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	$48.35B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.8%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	$16,483	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	151.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	$41.54B	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.8%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	$14,296	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	140.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	$42.97B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.7%	121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$14,977	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	146.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	$47.76B	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.6%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	$16,879	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	156.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	$54.26B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.9%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	$19,362	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	171.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	$55.12B	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.7%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	$19,721	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	173.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	$57.41B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	$20,535	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	187.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	$67.04B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.4%	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	$23,989	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	193.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	$71.03B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.5%	160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	$25,217	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	196.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	$79.79B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.3%	180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	$27,956	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	210.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	$84.87B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.8%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$29,684	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	217.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaEuropeNorthern EuropeWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars

Formation1970–1990

$10.31B → $10.31B

Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$10.31B → $36.65B

Compound annual change: +6.5% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$36.65B → $84.87B

Compound annual change: +6.2% CAGR

Nominal GDP$84.87B2024 · Published series · World rank 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP$64.58B2024 · Published series · World rank 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world GDP0.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	$10.31B	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$36.09B	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	$10.05B	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$34.04B	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	$8.09B	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$26.80B	73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	$6.94B	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$22.45B	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	$6.40B	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$20.26B	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	0.0%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	$6.75B	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$20.93B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	0.0%	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	$8.43B	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$21.98B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	0.0%	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	$10.17B	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$23.80B	80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	$11.29B	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$25.58B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	$11.02B	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$25.30B	80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	$11.55B	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$26.17B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	$12.26B	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$27.86B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	$14.28B	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$29.73B	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	$18.81B	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	0.0 (world = 100)	$32.87B	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.0%	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	$22.74B	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$35.01B	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	$26.12B	79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$37.72B	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	$30.11B	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$40.51B	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	$39.72B	76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$44.99B	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	$47.88B	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$46.16B	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	$37.49B	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$39.31B	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	$36.65B	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$39.48B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	$43.23B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$41.98B	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	$42.73B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$43.82B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	$46.29B	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$45.59B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	$48.35B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$47.31B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	$41.54B	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$48.65B	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	$42.97B	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$49.95B	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	$47.76B	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$52.25B	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	$54.26B	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$54.82B	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	$55.12B	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$57.39B	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	$57.41B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$57.41B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	$67.04B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$61.07B	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	$71.03B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$62.62B	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	$79.79B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$62.84B	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	$84.87B	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$64.58B	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

Europe$27.20T2024

Northern Europe$6.28T2024

World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person

Formation1970–1990

$2,789 → $2,789

Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$2,789 → $11,831

Compound annual change: +7.5% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$11,831 → $29,684

Compound annual change: +6.8% CAGR

GDP per person$29,6842024 · Published series · World rank 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP per person$22,5882024 · Published series · World rank 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	$2,789	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	64.3 (world = 100)	$9,767	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	136.5 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1991	$2,715	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	60.6 (world = 100)	$9,197	66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100	129.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1992	$2,189	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	46.4 (world = 100)	$7,249	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	101.3 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1993	$1,886	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	39.8 (world = 100)	$6,101	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	85.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1994	$1,750	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	35.2 (world = 100)	$5,544	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	76.0 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1995	$1,860	114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	34.2 (world = 100)	$5,770	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	77.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1996	$2,342	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	42.8 (world = 100)	$6,106	80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	80.7 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1997	$2,846	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	52.9 (world = 100)	$6,662	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	86.0 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1998	$3,182	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	60.4 (world = 100)	$7,210	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	91.8 (world = 100)
Lithuania	1999	$3,129	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	57.9 (world = 100)	$7,182	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	89.4 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2000	$3,300	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	60.1 (world = 100)	$7,475	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	90.3 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2001	$3,530	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	65.5 (world = 100)	$8,022	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	96.2 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2002	$4,146	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	75.0 (world = 100)	$8,634	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	102.7 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2003	$5,507	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	89.9 (world = 100)	$9,625	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	112.6 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2004	$6,734	68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.3 / 100	98.9 (world = 100)	$10,368	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	117.6 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2005	$7,862	73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	65.2 / 100	107.9 (world = 100)	$11,352	71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	125.5 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2006	$9,208	74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	118.1 (world = 100)	$12,388	71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	132.8 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2007	$12,293	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	141.6 (world = 100)	$13,924	66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.6 / 100	144.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2008	$14,968	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	159.0 (world = 100)	$14,432	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	149.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2009	$11,853	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	134.4 (world = 100)	$12,428	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	131.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2010	$11,831	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	124.0 (world = 100)	$12,745	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	131.2 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2011	$14,275	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	136.2 (world = 100)	$13,860	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	139.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2012	$14,297	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	135.2 (world = 100)	$14,662	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	145.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2013	$15,649	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	145.6 (world = 100)	$15,410	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	151.0 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2014	$16,483	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	151.2 (world = 100)	$16,129	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	155.2 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2015	$14,296	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	140.4 (world = 100)	$16,742	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	158.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2016	$14,977	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	146.4 (world = 100)	$17,409	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	161.9 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2017	$16,879	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	156.8 (world = 100)	$18,469	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	168.0 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2018	$19,362	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	171.3 (world = 100)	$19,562	59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	174.2 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2019	$19,721	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	173.8 (world = 100)	$20,532	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	180.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2020	$20,535	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	187.4 (world = 100)	$20,535	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	187.4 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2021	$23,989	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	193.2 (world = 100)	$21,856	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	189.0 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2022	$25,217	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	196.9 (world = 100)	$22,232	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	187.6 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2023	$27,956	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	210.9 (world = 100)	$22,017	56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	182.1 (world = 100)
Lithuania	2024	$29,684	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	217.1 (world = 100)	$22,588	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	183.3 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

Europe$36,4082024

Northern Europe$57,7922024

World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldConstant prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

Unavailable

Change: Unavailable

Integration1990–2010

-5.7% → 0.4%

Average annual rate: +0.9%

Current era2010–2024

0.4% → 2.8%

Average annual rate: +3.4%

Real GDP growth2.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP-per-person growth2.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Implicit GDP deflator138.72024 · Published series · World rank 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	0.1	179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	13.2 / 100
Lithuania	1991	-5.7%	170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	-5.8%	166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	0.4	177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	14.1 / 100
Lithuania	1992	-21.3%	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-23.3 pp vs world	-21.2%	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-21.6 pp vs world	4.4	164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100
Lithuania	1993	-16.2%	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-18.0 pp vs world	-15.8%	194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100	-16.0 pp vs world	17.9	134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100
Lithuania	1994	-9.8%	191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-13.1 pp vs world	-9.1%	190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	7.8 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	28.9	118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100
Lithuania	1995	3.3%	118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	4.1%	57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	42.6	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100
Lithuania	1996	5.0%	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	5.8%	44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	50.8	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100
Lithuania	1997	8.3%	28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	9.1%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	56.5	66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100
Lithuania	1998	7.5%	32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	8.2%	17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	92.2 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	58.4	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100
Lithuania	1999	-1.1%	177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	14.1 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	-0.4%	155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	57.6	75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100
Lithuania	2000	3.4%	132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	4.1%	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	58.4	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100
Lithuania	2001	6.5%	34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.9 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	7.3%	23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	89.3 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	58.2	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100
Lithuania	2002	6.7%	34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.9 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	7.6%	18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	91.7 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	58.4	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100
Lithuania	2003	10.6%	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	11.5%	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	57.9	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100
Lithuania	2004	6.5%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	7.7%	31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	85.4 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	59.7	105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100
Lithuania	2005	7.7%	42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	80.0 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	9.5%	19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	63.6	106 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100
Lithuania	2006	7.4%	59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.0 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	9.1%	26 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	87.9 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	67.7	104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100
Lithuania	2007	11.1%	22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	89.9 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	12.4%	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	73.7	93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100
Lithuania	2008	2.6%	133 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	36.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	3.7%	77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	80.9	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100
Lithuania	2009	-14.8%	205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-13.4 pp vs world	-13.9%	202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	3.8 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world	78.4	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100
Lithuania	2010	0.4%	177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	2.6%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	80.0	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100
Lithuania	2011	6.3%	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	8.7%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	84.5	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100
Lithuania	2012	4.4%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	5.8%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	86.7	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100
Lithuania	2013	4.0%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	5.1%	39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.8 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world	87.4	102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100
Lithuania	2014	3.8%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	4.7%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	87.9	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100
Lithuania	2015	2.8%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	3.8%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	87.9	126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100
Lithuania	2016	2.7%	121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	4.0%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	88.8	131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	37.8 / 100
Lithuania	2017	4.6%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	6.1%	16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	92.8 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	92.4	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100
Lithuania	2018	4.9%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	5.9%	19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	91.4 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	95.7	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100
Lithuania	2019	4.7%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	5.0%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	98.0	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100
Lithuania	2020	0.0%	40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	0.0%	26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.0 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	100.0	1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	100.0 / 100
Lithuania	2021	6.4%	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	6.4%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	106.0	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100
Lithuania	2022	2.5%	160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	1.7%	148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	29.7 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	123.0	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100
Lithuania	2023	0.3%	180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	-1.0%	179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	134.1	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100
Lithuania	2024	2.8%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	2.6%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	138.7	47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

Europe1.3%2024

Northern Europe1.3%2024

World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

75.3% → 75.3%

Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

75.3% → 84.2%

Percentage-point change: +8.9 pp

Current era2010–2024

84.2% → 74.4%

Percentage-point change: -9.8 pp

Final consumption74.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Household consumption55.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Government consumption18.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Domestic demand94.8%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	75.3%	138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	33.2 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	54.3%	147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	21.0%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	108.3%	73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	65.6%	182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.7 / 100	-9.5 pp vs world	53.8%	155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	24.5 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	11.9%	150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.0 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	90.3%	186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	9.3 / 100	-10.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	79.1%	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	64.8%	95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	53.9 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	14.3%	122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	95.1%	170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	86.9%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world	69.9%	79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	+11.1 pp vs world	17.0%	104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	106.4%	84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	86.5%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+11.0 pp vs world	65.0%	97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	21.5%	57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	105.2%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	88.2%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+13.3 pp vs world	64.3%	104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	23.8%	37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	110.7%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+11.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	88.4%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world	64.5%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	23.9%	34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.8 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world	109.3%	65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	68.6 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	85.7%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world	61.6%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	24.0%	29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	110.1%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+10.7 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	87.2%	73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.9 / 100	+11.6 pp vs world	61.4%	118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	25.8%	27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	87.3 / 100	+9.7 pp vs world	111.4%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+11.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	88.8%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	+12.9 pp vs world	65.2%	105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.0 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	23.6%	34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.8 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	110.0%	63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	87.0%	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	+11.5 pp vs world	64.6%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	22.4%	40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	80.9 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	106.2%	84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	86.1%	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	+9.7 pp vs world	65.0%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	21.1%	41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	105.5%	90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.4 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	84.6%	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	64.1%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	20.6%	49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	76.5 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	105.7%	89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	83.6%	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	64.0%	110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	19.5%	53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	105.8%	88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	83.6%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world	64.5%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	19.1%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	107.0%	86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	82.8%	91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	64.3%	103 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	18.5%	58 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	72.3 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	107.2%	87 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	83.4%	84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	64.2%	98 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	19.2%	50 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	76.2 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	110.3%	75 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	64.1 / 100	+11.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	80.7%	96 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	63.2%	105 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	17.5%	71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	113.1%	65 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	+13.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	83.4%	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	64.7%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	18.7%	59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	111.6%	81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	+12.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	88.8%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	+12.7 pp vs world	67.6%	90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	57.2 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	21.2%	49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.9 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	101.8%	121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	84.2%	91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+9.6 pp vs world	64.0%	105 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	20.2%	56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	73.6 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	102.0%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	80.3%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	61.8%	116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	44.7 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	18.5%	73 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	102.7%	111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.1 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	79.1%	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	61.5%	121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	17.6%	91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	56.7 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	99.4%	136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	78.1%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	61.3%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	16.8%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	98.5%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	77.8%	125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	61.1%	121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	16.7%	103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	98.1%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	78.4%	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	61.3%	120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.8 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	17.1%	98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	101.0%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	79.0%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	62.0%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	17.0%	98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	99.3%	139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	33.7 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	77.2%	125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	61.0%	117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	44.2 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	16.3%	104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	97.7%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	75.7%	133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	36.8 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	59.6%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	16.2%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	98.1%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	75.2%	135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.9 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	58.4%	128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.9 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	16.8%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	94.7%	165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	21.2 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	74.4%	152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	56.0%	144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	18.4%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	90.9%	188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	10.1 / 100	-8.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	73.7%	144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	56.2%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	17.5%	98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	95.5%	158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	24.5 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	74.0%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	57.1%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	16.9%	99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	102.1%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	74.2%	143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.1 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	56.7%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	17.5%	93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	55.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	96.1%	153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.9 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	74.4%	145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.1 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	55.6%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	18.8%	79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	62.5 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	94.8%	161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	23.1 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

Europe74.5%2024

Northern Europe74.0%2024

World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

33.0% → 33.0%

Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

33.0% → 17.9%

Percentage-point change: -15.2 pp

Current era2010–2024

17.9% → 20.4%

Percentage-point change: +2.6 pp

Gross capital formation20.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Gross fixed capital formation22.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Changes in inventories-2.2%2024 · Published series · World rank 156 of 163 · highest-to-lowest

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	33.0%	31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	26.3%	53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	6.7%	15 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	91.9 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	24.7%	79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	21.4%	105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.0 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	3.2%	39 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	77.8 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	16.0%	162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world	21.9%	89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	-6.0%	160 of 167 · highest-to-lowest	4.2 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	19.4%	122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	22.0%	86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	-2.6%	151 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	11.2 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	18.7%	140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	31.9 / 100	-5.7 pp vs world	22.0%	92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	-3.4%	158 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	7.1 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	22.5%	97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	20.2%	113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.1 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	2.3%	44 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	74.7 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	20.9%	118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	20.5%	114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	0.4%	100 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	24.4%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	22.3%	92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	2.1%	46 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	24.2%	86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	23.8%	82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	0.4%	105 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	37.7 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	21.2%	117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	21.9%	104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	-0.7%	139 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	17.4 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	19.1%	145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	19.1%	130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	36.8 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	0.0%	141 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	19.4%	146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	28.9 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	20.5%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	-1.1%	158 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	8.2 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	21.1%	121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	20.7%	111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.1 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	0.4%	107 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	39.1 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	22.2%	111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.1 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	21.6%	99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	0.7%	88 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	23.4%	94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	22.8%	82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	0.6%	99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	24.4%	89 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	57.3 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	23.4%	82 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	60.7 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	1.0%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	26.9%	75 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	64.1 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	26.1%	68 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	0.8%	94 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	32.4%	40 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	81.1 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	28.7%	53 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	74.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	3.8%	26 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	86.0 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	28.2%	75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	26.1%	79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	62.5 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	2.1%	53 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	70.9 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	13.0%	196 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	6.3 / 100	-10.4 pp vs world	17.9%	167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	20.2 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	-4.9%	177 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	17.9%	170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	18.8 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	17.1%	172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	17.8 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	0.7%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	22.4%	119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	43.3 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	18.9%	156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	25.5 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	3.5%	27 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	85.4 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	20.3%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	17.6%	160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	23.6 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	2.6%	33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	20.4%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	18.8%	151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	27.9 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	1.7%	40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	77.7 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	20.3%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	19.2%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-5.7 pp vs world	1.1%	55 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	69.0 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	22.6%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	19.7%	148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	2.9%	22 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	88.0 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	20.3%	137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	20.0%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	0.3%	112 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	20.5%	136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	20.2%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	0.3%	120 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	22.4%	112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	20.8%	125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.4 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	1.6%	55 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	69.0 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	19.6%	151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	27.9 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	21.3%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	-1.7%	169 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	16.5%	169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	21.5%	109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.1 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	-5.0%	173 of 173 · highest-to-lowest	0.0 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	21.8%	129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.5 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	22.6%	104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	-0.8%	159 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	7.1 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	28.1%	53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	75.0 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	22.6%	96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	54.3 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	5.4%	18 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	89.9 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	21.9%	121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	23.8%	83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	60.6 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	-1.8%	162 of 169 · highest-to-lowest	4.2 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	20.4%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	22.6%	100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	-2.2%	156 of 163 · highest-to-lowest	4.3 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

Europe21.8%2024

Northern Europe20.5%2024

World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Lithuania is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

LithuaniaNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

86.2% → 86.2%

Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

86.2% → 131.6%

Percentage-point change: +45.5 pp

Current era2010–2024

131.6% → 143.0%

Percentage-point change: +11.4 pp

Exports74.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Imports68.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Net exports5.2%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade openness143.0%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Lithuania	1990	38.7%	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	+19.8 pp vs world	47.4%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+28.3 pp vs world	-8.7%	141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	31.7 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	86.2%	68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.3 / 100	+48.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	22.1%	129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	37.6 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	16.5%	182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.7 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	5.6%	29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	38.5%	159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.9 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	17.4%	146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	15.6%	183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.2 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	1.8%	53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	33.0%	180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	12.7 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	61.4%	22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	89.8 / 100	+42.6 pp vs world	70.7%	27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	87.3 / 100	+52.4 pp vs world	-9.3%	143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	132.1%	21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	90.2 / 100	+95.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	41.2%	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+21.8 pp vs world	48.0%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+29.1 pp vs world	-6.8%	130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	37.1 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	89.2%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	+50.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	36.9%	80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	+16.3 pp vs world	47.6%	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	+27.5 pp vs world	-10.7%	151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.8 / 100	-11.1 pp vs world	84.5%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	+43.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	41.7%	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+20.6 pp vs world	51.1%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+30.4 pp vs world	-9.3%	139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	92.8%	66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100	+51.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	44.8%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+22.8 pp vs world	54.9%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	+33.4 pp vs world	-10.1%	146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-10.6 pp vs world	99.6%	58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+56.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	39.0%	75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100	+17.2 pp vs world	50.4%	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	+28.9 pp vs world	-11.4%	145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.8 / 100	-11.8 pp vs world	89.4%	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	+46.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	32.3%	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+10.5 pp vs world	42.3%	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	+20.7 pp vs world	-10.0%	141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	31.7 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	74.6%	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+31.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	38.5%	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	+14.9 pp vs world	44.7%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	+21.3 pp vs world	-6.2%	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	83.2%	95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	+36.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	44.0%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+21.1 pp vs world	49.5%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+26.5 pp vs world	-5.5%	116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.9 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	93.5%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	+47.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	47.3%	58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+24.1 pp vs world	53.0%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	+30.0 pp vs world	-5.7%	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	100.3%	55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+54.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	46.2%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+22.2 pp vs world	51.9%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+28.2 pp vs world	-5.8%	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	98.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	+50.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	48.5%	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+22.8 pp vs world	55.5%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+30.1 pp vs world	-7.0%	119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.4 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	104.1%	56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.2 / 100	+52.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	55.1%	53 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	74.9 / 100	+28.1 pp vs world	62.3%	46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	78.3 / 100	+35.7 pp vs world	-7.2%	116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	44.4 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	117.4%	48 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	77.3 / 100	+63.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	57.2%	50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	76.3 / 100	+28.4 pp vs world	67.4%	44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	79.2 / 100	+39.4 pp vs world	-10.3%	130 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	37.7 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	124.6%	41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	80.7 / 100	+67.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	51.6%	63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	70.0 / 100	+22.0 pp vs world	64.7%	49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	76.8 / 100	+35.8 pp vs world	-13.1%	143 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	31.4 / 100	-13.8 pp vs world	116.3%	49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	76.8 / 100	+57.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	57.6%	50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	76.6 / 100	+26.6 pp vs world	69.2%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+39.0 pp vs world	-11.6%	126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	-12.3 pp vs world	126.8%	43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.9 / 100	+65.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	51.6%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+25.4 pp vs world	53.4%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+27.8 pp vs world	-1.8%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	105.0%	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+53.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	64.8%	36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+36.2 pp vs world	66.8%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+39.2 pp vs world	-2.0%	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	131.6%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+75.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	73.5%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+43.1 pp vs world	76.2%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+46.7 pp vs world	-2.7%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	149.6%	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100	+89.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	78.6%	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100	+48.5 pp vs world	78.0%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+48.8 pp vs world	0.6%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	156.6%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+97.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	79.0%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+48.9 pp vs world	77.6%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+48.5 pp vs world	1.5%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	156.6%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+97.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	72.6%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+42.9 pp vs world	70.7%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+41.7 pp vs world	1.9%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	143.3%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+84.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	68.6%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+40.5 pp vs world	69.6%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+42.1 pp vs world	-1.0%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	138.2%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+82.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	67.7%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+40.5 pp vs world	67.0%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+40.6 pp vs world	0.7%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	134.7%	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+81.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	73.6%	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+45.5 pp vs world	71.3%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+44.0 pp vs world	2.3%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	144.9%	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100	+89.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	74.5%	23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.5 / 100	+45.4 pp vs world	72.7%	29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.6 / 100	+44.4 pp vs world	1.9%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	147.2%	22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.0 / 100	+89.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	76.8%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+48.7 pp vs world	71.6%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+44.1 pp vs world	5.3%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	148.4%	21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+92.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	72.4%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+46.3 pp vs world	63.4%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+38.0 pp vs world	9.1%	21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+8.4 pp vs world	135.8%	22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.0 / 100	+84.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	79.6%	20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+51.0 pp vs world	75.2%	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+47.5 pp vs world	4.5%	52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	154.8%	21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+98.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	86.8%	19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	91.4 / 100	+55.9 pp vs world	88.9%	22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.0 / 100	+58.8 pp vs world	-2.1%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	175.7%	18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	91.9 / 100	+114.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	76.5%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+47.4 pp vs world	72.6%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+44.2 pp vs world	3.9%	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	149.0%	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100	+91.7 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	74.1%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+45.1 pp vs world	68.9%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+40.8 pp vs world	5.2%	47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	143.0%	26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.0 / 100	+86.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

Europe88.4%2024

Northern Europe93.8%2024

World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 38.8%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing2.9%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010-22.1 pp2010–2024-0.6 pp

World specialization: 0.67×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities18.7%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010+4.5 pp2010–2024-4.7 pp

World specialization: 0.88×

Construction7.4%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010-3.4 pp2010–2024+1.5 pp

World specialization: 1.29×

Trade, restaurants and hotels16.8%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010+10.2 pp2010–2024-2.0 pp

World specialization: 1.16×

Transport, storage and communication15.4%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010+7.5 pp2010–2024+0.3 pp

World specialization: 1.57×

Other activities38.8%

1970–19900.0 pp1990–2010+3.3 pp2010–2024+5.5 pp

World specialization: 0.87×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added

Formation1970–1990

29.9% → 29.9%

Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

29.9% → 33.3%

Percentage-point change: +3.3 pp

Current era2010–2024

33.3% → 38.8%

Percentage-point change: +5.5 pp

How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing0.67×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities0.88×

Construction1.29×

Trade, restaurants and hotels1.16×

Transport, storage and communication1.57×

Other activities0.87×

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table35 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table

Lithuania	1990	25.5%	52 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	74.9 / 100	+20.3 pp vs world	18.9%	134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	9.4%	28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.8 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	8.6%	165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	7.6%	105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	29.9%	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	-9.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	16.2%	90 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	56.2 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world	42.2%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	+16.2 pp vs world	5.3%	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	7.4%	183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	10.8 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	8.3%	88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	20.7%	165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.0 / 100	-19.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	13.6%	96 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	53.2 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	35.5%	29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world	3.9%	152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	10.5%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	9.6%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	26.9%	129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	37.6 / 100	-14.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	14.1%	91 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world	32.6%	32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.9 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world	5.1%	115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	15.0%	94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	9.9%	51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	75.5 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	23.4%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	-18.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	10.4%	106 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	25.4%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	7.1%	51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	18.3%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	10.1%	48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.0 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	28.7%	118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	-12.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	11.0%	103 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	24.7%	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	7.0%	47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	77.6 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	17.5%	68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	8.7%	82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	31.1%	108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-11.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	12.1%	97 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	23.6%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	6.8%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	17.4%	71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	9.5%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	30.7%	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-11.7 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	10.7%	101 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	23.4%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	7.5%	40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	81.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	17.6%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	9.9%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	30.9%	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	-11.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	8.7%	115 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	22.9%	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	8.3%	32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.9 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	17.7%	69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	10.2%	57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	32.2%	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	-11.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	7.2%	118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	42.4 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world	22.5%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	7.5%	36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	82.9 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	17.2%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	11.3%	44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	34.3%	95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	6.3%	124 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	23.8%	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	6.0%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	18.1%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	13.2%	18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	91.7 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	32.6%	108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-11.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	5.5%	133 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	35.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	24.6%	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	5.9%	75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	18.9%	46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.9 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	13.3%	19 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	31.7%	120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	42.0 / 100	-12.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	5.4%	132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	35.5 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	23.4%	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	6.3%	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	19.3%	42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	79.9 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	14.1%	14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	93.6 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	31.5%	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	-13.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	4.9%	132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	35.5 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	24.3%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	6.9%	51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	19.1%	39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	81.4 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	14.3%	15 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	93.1 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	30.5%	127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	38.5 / 100	-14.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	4.6%	135 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	25.5%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	7.2%	45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	78.5 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	18.6%	45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	78.4 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	13.6%	21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	90.2 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	30.3%	122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.0 / 100	-14.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	4.8%	129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	25.0%	72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	7.8%	36 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	18.7%	46 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	78.2 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	13.6%	20 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	90.8 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	30.2%	128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	38.6 / 100	-14.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	4.3%	132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	35.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	23.9%	80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	9.5%	25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	88.4 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	17.7%	59 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	13.7%	15 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	31.0%	123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	-12.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	3.9%	139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	21.8%	95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	11.2%	16 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	92.8 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	18.1%	52 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	75.2 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	13.6%	14 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	31.4%	124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	40.6 / 100	-12.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	3.7%	141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.0 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	21.3%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	11.2%	22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.0 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	18.7%	51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.0 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	12.7%	22 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	89.9 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	32.3%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	-10.8 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	2.8%	147 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	29.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	21.2%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	6.6%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	18.9%	51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.0 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	14.5%	6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	97.6 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	35.9%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	-9.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	3.4%	141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	23.4%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	5.9%	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	18.9%	53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	75.0 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	15.1%	6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	97.6 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	33.3%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	-10.6 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	3.9%	135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	35.0 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	24.9%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	6.8%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	19.0%	49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.9 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	14.4%	8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	31.0%	124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	-12.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	4.5%	126 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	39.3 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	25.1%	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	6.2%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	19.6%	43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	79.8 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	14.6%	5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	98.1 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	30.0%	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-13.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	3.9%	133 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	35.9 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	23.9%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	6.7%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	19.9%	43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	79.8 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	15.1%	5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	98.1 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	30.4%	129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.8 / 100	-12.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	3.8%	137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	23.3%	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	7.5%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	19.8%	44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	79.3 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	14.8%	6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	97.6 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	30.7%	135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.9 / 100	-12.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	3.8%	136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	22.6%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	7.5%	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	19.7%	43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	79.8 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	14.6%	6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	97.6 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	31.8%	136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.4 / 100	-12.5 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	3.5%	140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	22.2%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	6.8%	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	19.7%	48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	77.4 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	15.0%	4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	98.6 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	32.8%	130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.3 / 100	-12.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	4.0%	132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	36.4 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	22.1%	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	6.7%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	19.5%	50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.4 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	15.5%	5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	98.1 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	32.3%	132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-12.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	3.2%	137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	21.5%	91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	7.0%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	19.6%	54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	15.9%	4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	98.6 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	32.8%	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-11.4 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	3.5%	137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	20.9%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	7.3%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	18.7%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	16.3%	5 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	98.1 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	33.3%	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	4.0%	134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	35.4 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	20.4%	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	7.3%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	18.1%	50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	76.6 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	15.7%	4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	98.6 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	34.5%	130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.3 / 100	-11.1 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	3.8%	135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	35.0 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	20.8%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	7.1%	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	17.8%	60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	15.4%	4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	98.6 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	35.1%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	4.3%	126 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	39.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	21.4%	102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	6.9%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	17.2%	76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.1 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	15.9%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	34.3%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	3.0%	140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	19.6%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	7.3%	57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	73.2 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	16.8%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	16.1%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	37.1%	103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	2.9%	144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	30.6 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	18.7%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	7.4%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	16.8%	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	15.4%	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	38.8%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	-5.7 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 15.7% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Lithuania was 0.0 percentage points above the world value.

Latest share: 15.7%
World specialization: 1.00×
Latest year: 2024

Formation1970–1990

16.2% → 16.2%

Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

16.2% → 18.9%

Percentage-point change: +2.7 pp

Current era2010–2024

18.9% → 15.7%

Percentage-point change: -3.3 pp

Share of total GVA15.7%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share within parent activity83.9%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real manufacturing growth4.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world manufacturing0.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table35 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 35 of 35 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table

Lithuania	1990	16.2%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	85.6%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+7.2 pp vs world	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	0.0%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1991	36.2%	8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	+15.7 pp vs world	85.8%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	92.9%	1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	100.0 / 100	+92.8 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	1992	30.5%	11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	+10.7 pp vs world	85.9%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	-33.7%	198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-33.1 pp vs world	0.0%	74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.2 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1993	27.8%	9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	85.1%	53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	-21.5%	193 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100	-20.8 pp vs world	0.0%	80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.3 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1994	22.0%	37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	86.4%	48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.0 / 100	+8.2 pp vs world	-30.0%	196 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	4.4 / 100	-33.5 pp vs world	0.0%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1995	19.0%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	77.0%	99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	-53.5%	204 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-58.4 pp vs world	0.0%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1996	18.2%	62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	77.3%	90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.4 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	3.9%	95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	53.9 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	0.0%	84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1997	18.5%	62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	79.0%	83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	9.0%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	0.0%	83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1998	18.1%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	78.9%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	13.6%	19 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+12.3 pp vs world	0.0%	80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.3 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	1999	17.4%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	77.5%	89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	-2.9%	170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	0.0%	81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2000	19.1%	49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	76.5 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	80.1%	75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	63.7 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	12.2%	49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	76.5 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	0.0%	79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2001	19.6%	42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	79.9 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	79.4%	76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	12.9%	25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	88.2 / 100	+13.7 pp vs world	0.0%	76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2002	18.5%	53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	79.1%	78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	5.0%	73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	0.0%	74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.2 / 100	-100.0 pp vs world
Lithuania	2003	18.8%	47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.5 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	77.3%	80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.3 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	13.5%	35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2004	20.2%	35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.4 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	79.3%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	12.1%	29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2005	20.3%	35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	83.6 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	81.0%	66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.6 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	9.3%	46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2006	19.6%	42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	80.2 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	81.9%	58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	9.5%	54 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	74.3 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2007	17.8%	56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	73.4 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	81.4%	58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	4.7%	103 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2008	17.5%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	82.0%	60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+12.1 pp vs world	2.2%	103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	0.1%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2009	16.8%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	79.0%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	-16.0%	189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	10.0 / 100	-9.7 pp vs world	0.1%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2010	18.9%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	80.9%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world	8.8%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	0.1%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2011	20.4%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world	82.1%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+12.8 pp vs world	10.4%	40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.3 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	0.1%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2012	20.8%	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	82.6%	40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.3 / 100	+13.1 pp vs world	6.2%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	0.1%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2013	19.6%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	82.0%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+12.0 pp vs world	4.4%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	0.1%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2014	19.4%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	83.0%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+11.3 pp vs world	4.4%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	0.1%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2015	19.2%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	85.2%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	3.6%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	0.1%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2016	18.8%	35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	83.7 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	84.5%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	2.7%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	0.1%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2017	18.7%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	84.7%	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	6.0%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	0.1%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2018	18.4%	39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.8 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	85.5%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+10.5 pp vs world	4.7%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2019	17.9%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	85.7%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world	4.0%	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	0.1%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2020	17.3%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	84.6%	31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	1.0%	47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	0.1%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2021	17.9%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	85.9%	30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	86.1 / 100	+10.4 pp vs world	11.0%	51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	76.1 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	0.1%	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2022	18.1%	46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.5 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	84.3%	35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	83.7 / 100	+12.4 pp vs world	5.2%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	0.1%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2023	16.2%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	82.7%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	-3.8%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	0.1%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Lithuania	2024	15.7%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	83.9%	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	4.4%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	0.1%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

Europe1.08×

Northern Europe1.26×

World1.00×

Lithuania Economic Overview

Read the economy through three eras

What should a reader know first?

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Real GDP trajectory

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal GDP

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

What does the record show per person?

GDP per person

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Final Consumption

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Trade openness

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Structural change across six activities

Industry composition and economic scale

Broad industry structure over time

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Manufacturing in the economic structure