Source-specific country analysis
Cuba Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | $5.69B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $645 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 69.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | $6.91B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.6% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | $770 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 76.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | $8.14B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $892 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 78.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | $9.99B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $1,079 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | $11.41B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $1,217 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 81.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | $13.03B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 9.5% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | $1,374 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 83.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | $13.79B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | $1,441 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 82.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | $14.21B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.7% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | $1,472 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 76.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | $17.84B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $1,837 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 81.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | $19.58B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.1% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $2,006 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 78.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | $19.91B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -4.8% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | $2,031 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | $20.15B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 19.7% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | $2,046 | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 73.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | $20.95B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.9% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | $2,114 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 77.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | $22.21B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | $2,223 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 80.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | $24.04B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | $2,386 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 86.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | $22.92B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | $2,257 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 80.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | $24.23B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | $2,365 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 74.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | $25.21B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -2.4% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | $2,440 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 69.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | $27.46B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | $2,632 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 68.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | $27.02B | 53 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $2,566 | 73 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | 64.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | $28.65B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -2.9% | 159 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | $2,694 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 62.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | $24.32B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -10.7% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | $2,269 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 50.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | $22.09B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -11.6% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | $2,048 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 43.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | $22.37B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -14.9% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | $2,063 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 43.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | $28.45B | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | $2,613 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 52.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | $30.43B | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $2,785 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 51.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | $25.02B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 7.8% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | $2,282 | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 41.7 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | $25.36B | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $2,306 | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | 42.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | $25.74B | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | $2,332 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 44.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | $28.36B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | $2,562 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 47.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | $30.57B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 5.9% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $2,751 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 50.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | $31.68B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $2,843 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 52.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | $33.59B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.4% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | $3,005 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 54.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | $35.90B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $3,203 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 52.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | $38.20B | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 5.8% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $3,399 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 49.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | $42.64B | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 11.2% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | $3,786 | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 52.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | $52.74B | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 12.1% | 20 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.8 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | $4,676 | 98 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 60.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | $58.60B | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 7.3% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $5,192 | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 59.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | $60.81B | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.1% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $5,385 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 57.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | $62.08B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $5,496 | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 62.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | $64.33B | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.4% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | $5,694 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 59.7 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | $69.51B | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $6,151 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 58.7 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | $73.14B | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $6,471 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 61.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | $77.15B | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | $6,828 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 63.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | $80.66B | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | $7,147 | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 65.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | $87.21B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $7,734 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 75.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | $91.37B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $8,111 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 79.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | $96.85B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | $8,611 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | $100.05B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.2% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | $8,911 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 78.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | $103.43B | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -0.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | $9,232 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 81.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | $107.35B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -10.9% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | $9,605 | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 87.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | $126.69B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.3% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | $11,391 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | $147.11B | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | $13,302 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 103.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | $192.69B | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -1.9% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | $17,485 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 131.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | $252.06B | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -1.1% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | $22,957 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 167.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$5.69B → $28.65B
Compound annual change: +8.4% CAGR$28.65B → $64.33B
Compound annual change: +4.1% CAGR$64.33B → $252.06B
Compound annual change: +10.2% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | $5.69B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $30.62B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | $6.91B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $33.25B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | $8.14B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $34.86B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | $9.99B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $36.05B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | $11.41B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $36.41B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | $13.03B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $39.86B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | $13.79B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $42.02B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | $14.21B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $45.68B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | $17.84B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $48.70B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | $19.58B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $49.23B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | $19.91B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $46.84B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | $20.15B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $56.06B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | $20.95B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $61.06B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | $22.21B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $64.36B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | $24.04B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $69.47B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | $22.92B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $70.58B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | $24.23B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $70.64B | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | $25.21B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $68.95B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | $27.46B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $71.50B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | $27.02B | 53 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $71.99B | 47 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | $28.65B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $69.87B | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | $24.32B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $62.39B | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | $22.09B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $55.17B | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | $22.37B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $46.96B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | $28.45B | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $47.30B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | $30.43B | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $48.46B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | $25.02B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $52.26B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | $25.36B | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $53.71B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | $25.74B | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $53.80B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | $28.36B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $57.13B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | $30.57B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $60.51B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | $31.68B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $62.43B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | $33.59B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $63.32B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | $35.90B | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $65.72B | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | $38.20B | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $69.52B | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | $42.64B | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $77.30B | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | $52.74B | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $86.63B | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | $58.60B | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $92.92B | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | $60.81B | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $96.75B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | $62.08B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $98.15B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | $64.33B | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $100.50B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | $69.51B | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $103.31B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | $73.14B | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $106.43B | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | $77.15B | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $109.35B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | $80.66B | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $110.50B | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | $87.21B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $115.40B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | $91.37B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $116.00B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | $96.85B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $118.09B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | $100.05B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $120.75B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | $103.43B | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $120.55B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | $107.35B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $107.35B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | $126.69B | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $108.70B | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | $147.11B | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $110.63B | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | $192.69B | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $108.49B | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | $252.06B | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $107.34B | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean$628.84B2024
World$111.57T2024
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$645 → $2,694
Compound annual change: +7.4% CAGR$2,694 → $5,694
Compound annual change: +3.8% CAGR$5,694 → $22,957
Compound annual change: +10.5% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | $645 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 69.5 (world = 100) | $3,470 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 66.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1971 | $770 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 76.9 (world = 100) | $3,703 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 69.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1972 | $892 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 78.9 (world = 100) | $3,820 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 69.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1973 | $1,079 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | $3,895 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 68.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1974 | $1,217 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 81.2 (world = 100) | $3,884 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 67.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1975 | $1,374 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 83.5 (world = 100) | $4,205 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 74.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1976 | $1,441 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 82.5 (world = 100) | $4,390 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 75.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1977 | $1,472 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 76.2 (world = 100) | $4,735 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 79.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1978 | $1,837 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 81.6 (world = 100) | $5,014 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 81.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1979 | $2,006 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 78.8 (world = 100) | $5,042 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 80.3 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1980 | $2,031 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.8 (world = 100) | $4,777 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 76.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1981 | $2,046 | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 73.0 (world = 100) | $5,692 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 90.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1982 | $2,114 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 77.5 (world = 100) | $6,160 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 99.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1983 | $2,223 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 80.9 (world = 100) | $6,442 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 102.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1984 | $2,386 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 86.0 (world = 100) | $6,896 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 106.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1985 | $2,257 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 80.6 (world = 100) | $6,948 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 105.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1986 | $2,365 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 74.6 (world = 100) | $6,896 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 103.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1987 | $2,440 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 69.3 (world = 100) | $6,671 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 98.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1988 | $2,632 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 68.0 (world = 100) | $6,854 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 98.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1989 | $2,566 | 73 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | 64.6 (world = 100) | $6,834 | 68 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 96.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1990 | $2,694 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 62.1 (world = 100) | $6,571 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1991 | $2,269 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 50.6 (world = 100) | $5,822 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 81.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1992 | $2,048 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 43.4 (world = 100) | $5,115 | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | 71.5 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1993 | $2,063 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 43.6 (world = 100) | $4,332 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 60.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1994 | $2,613 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 52.5 (world = 100) | $4,345 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 59.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1995 | $2,785 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 51.2 (world = 100) | $4,436 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 59.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1996 | $2,282 | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 41.7 (world = 100) | $4,767 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 63.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1997 | $2,306 | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | 42.9 (world = 100) | $4,884 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 63.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1998 | $2,332 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 44.3 (world = 100) | $4,875 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 62.0 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 1999 | $2,562 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 47.4 (world = 100) | $5,159 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 64.3 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2000 | $2,751 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 50.1 (world = 100) | $5,446 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 65.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2001 | $2,843 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 52.8 (world = 100) | $5,602 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 67.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2002 | $3,005 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 54.3 (world = 100) | $5,665 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 67.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2003 | $3,203 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 52.3 (world = 100) | $5,863 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 68.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2004 | $3,399 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 49.9 (world = 100) | $6,185 | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | 70.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2005 | $3,786 | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 52.0 (world = 100) | $6,864 | 89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.5 / 100 | 75.9 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2006 | $4,676 | 98 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 60.0 (world = 100) | $7,681 | 87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | 82.3 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2007 | $5,192 | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 59.8 (world = 100) | $8,232 | 87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | 85.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2008 | $5,385 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 57.2 (world = 100) | $8,568 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 88.5 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2009 | $5,496 | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 62.3 (world = 100) | $8,690 | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 92.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2010 | $5,694 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 59.7 (world = 100) | $8,896 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 91.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2011 | $6,151 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 58.7 (world = 100) | $9,142 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 92.3 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2012 | $6,471 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 61.2 (world = 100) | $9,416 | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 93.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2013 | $6,828 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 63.5 (world = 100) | $9,679 | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 94.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2014 | $7,147 | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 65.6 (world = 100) | $9,791 | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 94.2 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2015 | $7,734 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 75.9 (world = 100) | $10,235 | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 96.7 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2016 | $8,111 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 79.3 (world = 100) | $10,296 | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 95.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2017 | $8,611 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | $10,499 | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 95.5 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2018 | $8,911 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 78.8 (world = 100) | $10,755 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 95.8 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2019 | $9,232 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 81.3 (world = 100) | $10,761 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 94.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2020 | $9,605 | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 87.6 (world = 100) | $9,605 | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 87.6 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2021 | $11,391 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) | $9,773 | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 84.5 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2022 | $13,302 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | 103.9 (world = 100) | $10,003 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 84.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2023 | $17,485 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 131.9 (world = 100) | $9,845 | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | 81.4 (world = 100) |
| Cuba | 2024 | $22,957 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 167.9 (world = 100) | $9,776 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 79.3 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean$14,4322024
World$13,6732024
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
8.6% → -2.9%
Average annual rate: +4.3%-2.9% → 2.4%
Average annual rate: +1.8%2.4% → -1.1%
Average annual rate: +0.7%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 18.6 | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1971 | 8.6% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 6.7% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 20.8 | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1972 | 4.8% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 3.2% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 22.2 | 13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1973 | 3.4% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 2.0% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 23.0 | 16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1974 | 1.0% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | -0.3% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 25.7 | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1975 | 9.5% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 8.3% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 26.8 | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1976 | 5.4% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 4.4% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 26.9 | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1977 | 8.7% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 7.8% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 25.8 | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1978 | 6.6% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 5.9% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 28.2 | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1979 | 1.1% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 0.6% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 29.0 | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1980 | -4.8% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | -5.3% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 30.6 | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1981 | 19.7% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | 19.1% | 1 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 29.8 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1982 | 8.9% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 8.2% | 7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 29.2 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1983 | 5.4% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 4.6% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 29.6 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1984 | 7.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 7.0% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 30.4 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1985 | 1.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 0.8% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 29.7 | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1986 | 0.1% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | -0.8% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 28.6 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1987 | -2.4% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | -3.3% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 28.8 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1988 | 3.7% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 2.7% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 29.1 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1989 | 0.7% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -0.3% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 29.3 | 89 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1990 | -2.9% | 159 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | -3.8% | 153 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 30.8 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1991 | -10.7% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | -11.4% | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 28.6 | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1992 | -11.6% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | -12.1% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world | 29.6 | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1993 | -14.9% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | -15.3% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 35.2 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1994 | 0.7% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 44.5 | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1995 | 2.5% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 2.1% | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 49.2 | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1996 | 7.8% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 7.5% | 22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 47.9 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1997 | 2.8% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 2.4% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 47.2 | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1998 | 0.2% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 47.8 | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 1999 | 6.2% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 5.8% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 49.7 | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2000 | 5.9% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 5.6% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 50.5 | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2001 | 3.2% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 2.9% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 50.7 | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2002 | 1.4% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 1.1% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 53.0 | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2003 | 3.8% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 3.5% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 54.6 | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2004 | 5.8% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 5.5% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 55.0 | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2005 | 11.2% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 11.0% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 55.2 | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2006 | 12.1% | 20 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.8 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 11.9% | 14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 60.9 | 119 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.0 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2007 | 7.3% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 7.2% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 63.1 | 124 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2008 | 4.1% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 4.1% | 69 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.1 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 62.9 | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2009 | 1.5% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 1.4% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 63.2 | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2010 | 2.4% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 2.4% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 64.0 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2011 | 2.8% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 2.8% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 66.8 | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2012 | 3.0% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 3.0% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 68.7 | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2013 | 2.7% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 2.8% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 70.5 | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2014 | 1.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 1.2% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 73.0 | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2015 | 4.4% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 4.5% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 75.5 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2016 | 0.5% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.6% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 78.8 | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2017 | 1.8% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 2.0% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 82.0 | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2018 | 2.2% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 2.4% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 82.9 | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2019 | -0.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 85.8 | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2020 | -10.9% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | -10.7% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2021 | 1.3% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 116.6 | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2022 | 1.8% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 2.3% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 133.0 | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2023 | -1.9% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | -1.6% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 177.6 | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 |
| Cuba | 2024 | -1.1% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | -0.7% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 234.8 | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean2.1%2024
World2.8%2024
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
86.3% → 84.9%
Percentage-point change: -1.4 pp84.9% → 85.1%
Percentage-point change: +0.2 pp85.1% → 114.6%
Percentage-point change: +29.5 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | 86.3% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 54.6% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 31.7% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 112.2% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | 86.3% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 54.6% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 31.7% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 112.2% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | 86.3% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 54.6% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 31.7% | 9 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 95.5 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 112.2% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | 86.3% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 54.6% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 31.7% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +16.0 pp vs world | 112.2% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | 86.3% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 54.6% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 31.7% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 112.2% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | 86.2% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 54.6% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 31.7% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 112.2% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | 86.2% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 54.5% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 31.7% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 112.2% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | 86.3% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 54.6% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 31.7% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 112.2% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | 86.4% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 54.7% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 31.7% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 112.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | 86.5% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 54.8% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 31.7% | 12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | 112.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | 85.8% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 54.2% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 31.6% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 112.1% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | 86.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 54.5% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 31.7% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 112.3% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | 86.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 54.9% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 31.7% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 112.2% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | 86.7% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 55.0% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 31.7% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 112.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | 87.0% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 55.2% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 31.7% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 112.5% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | 82.7% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 51.6% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 31.1% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 111.5% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | 87.7% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 55.6% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 32.1% | 21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.6 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 113.2% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | 88.9% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 56.9% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 32.0% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 111.8% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | 87.4% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 55.6% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 31.8% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 111.4% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | 88.1% | 54 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 56.4% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 31.7% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 114.5% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | 84.9% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 53.9% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 31.0% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 109.7% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | 92.7% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 59.4% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 33.3% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world | 106.7% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | 95.9% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 61.1% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 34.8% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 102.4% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | 97.3% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +21.8 pp vs world | 61.9% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 35.4% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 103.7% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | 95.2% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 68.0% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 27.3% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 100.5% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | 94.9% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 70.5% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 24.4% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 101.9% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | 86.1% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 59.5% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 26.6% | 24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 102.0% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | 88.0% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 61.1% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 26.8% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 102.9% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | 90.8% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world | 63.1% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 27.7% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 104.0% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | 90.9% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 62.0% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 28.9% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 102.8% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | 90.3% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 60.7% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 29.6% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 102.8% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | 91.4% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 60.5% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 30.9% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 102.9% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | 92.5% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 58.4% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 34.1% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 101.7% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | 92.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 58.4% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 33.7% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 100.7% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | 90.5% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 55.0% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 35.5% | 12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 99.3% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | 86.6% | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 52.9% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 33.6% | 13 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 97.3% | 144 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | 88.0% | 67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 55.8% | 139 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 32.2% | 14 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 99.8% | 128 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | 87.1% | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 51.7% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 35.4% | 11 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 97.3% | 146 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 29.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | 88.9% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 49.1% | 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.2 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 39.9% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 103.8% | 118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | 87.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 48.1% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 39.0% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +21.0 pp vs world | 98.0% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | 85.1% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 50.3% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 34.8% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +17.3 pp vs world | 95.2% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | 88.3% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 52.9% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 35.4% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +18.2 pp vs world | 96.8% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | 86.3% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 54.4% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 31.9% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world | 94.8% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | 86.7% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 54.3% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 32.4% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 96.1% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | 87.5% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 55.1% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 32.4% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 95.1% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | 87.9% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 55.7% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 32.2% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 97.3% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | 87.7% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 55.8% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 31.9% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 97.3% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | 86.8% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 56.0% | 143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 30.8% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 97.1% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | 86.0% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 56.0% | 143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 30.0% | 14 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 98.0% | 147 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | 86.9% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 54.7% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 32.2% | 14 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 98.4% | 143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | 89.5% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world | 50.6% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 38.8% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +21.1 pp vs world | 99.3% | 135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | 96.6% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +24.7 pp vs world | 43.9% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 52.6% | 6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +35.7 pp vs world | 104.5% | 97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | 102.6% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | 51.7% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 50.9% | 6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +34.5 pp vs world | 108.7% | 80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | 109.4% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +36.4 pp vs world | 67.8% | 87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 41.6% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world | 116.5% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | 114.6% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +41.3 pp vs world | 75.9% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 38.6% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +22.1 pp vs world | 122.6% | 36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.2 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean95.4%2024
World73.2%2024
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
25.9% → 24.8%
Percentage-point change: -1.1 pp24.8% → 10.1%
Percentage-point change: -14.7 pp10.1% → 8.0%
Percentage-point change: -2.0 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | 25.9% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 25.4% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 0.5% | 98 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | 25.9% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 25.4% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.5% | 95 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | 25.9% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 25.4% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 89 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | 25.9% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.5% | 98 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | 25.9% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 25.4% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.5% | 105 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 24.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | 26.0% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 25.4% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 83 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | 26.0% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 25.4% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.5% | 89 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | 25.9% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 25.4% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.5% | 92 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | 25.8% | 75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.4% | 89 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | 25.8% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 25.4% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 102 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | 26.3% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.9% | 87 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | 26.1% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 25.6% | 73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.5% | 91 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | 25.6% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 92 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | 25.3% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 25.2% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 84 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | 25.5% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 25.3% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 105 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | 28.8% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 25.3% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 3.5% | 22 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | 25.5% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 26.9% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | -1.3% | 134 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 9.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | 22.9% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 24.3% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | -1.4% | 137 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | 24.0% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 24.4% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | -0.4% | 126 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | 26.3% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 25.6% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 85 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | 24.8% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 24.5% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 115 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | 14.0% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 22.6% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | -8.6% | 171 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 0.6 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | 6.5% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world | 15.6% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | -9.1% | 164 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 1.8 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | 6.4% | 202 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -17.8 pp vs world | 13.7% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | -7.3% | 164 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 3.6 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | 5.2% | 205 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -19.2 pp vs world | 8.2% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world | -3.0% | 154 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 9.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | 7.0% | 203 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 7.8% | 202 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | -0.7% | 155 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 9.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | 15.9% | 176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 11.7% | 192 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.4 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 21 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | 15.0% | 181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.8 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 11.7% | 187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 3.2% | 33 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | 13.2% | 187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 12.1% | 189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 1.1% | 62 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | 11.9% | 194 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 11.6% | 192 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.4 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 0.3% | 92 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | 12.5% | 188 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 11.9% | 191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.9 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 0.6% | 99 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | 11.5% | 196 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 10.8% | 194 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 0.7% | 84 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | 9.2% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | 9.2% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 134 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | 8.5% | 203 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 8.2% | 203 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 117 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 32.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | 8.8% | 201 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world | 8.5% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | 10.8% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 9.0% | 204 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 1.8% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | 11.7% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -13.1 pp vs world | 10.4% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | 1.3% | 64 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | 10.2% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -15.1 pp vs world | 9.7% | 203 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 119 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | 14.8% | 189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 10.8% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | 4.0% | 26 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | 10.9% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -12.4 pp vs world | 8.7% | 208 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -15.0 pp vs world | 2.3% | 26 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | 10.1% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -14.5 pp vs world | 8.6% | 208 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | 1.4% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | 8.5% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 7.7% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 0.8% | 100 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | 8.6% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 7.8% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | 9.4% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -16.0 pp vs world | 8.2% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 1.1% | 61 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | 7.6% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world | 7.3% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 112 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | 9.4% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 8.6% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | 9.6% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 8.8% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world | 0.7% | 66 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | 10.3% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -15.6 pp vs world | 9.9% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -15.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 111 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | 12.0% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world | 11.4% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world | 0.6% | 105 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | 11.5% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 112 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | 9.9% | 199 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -16.4 pp vs world | 9.8% | 199 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 109 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 37.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | 7.9% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -19.1 pp vs world | 7.9% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -18.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Cuba | 2022 | 6.1% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -21.1 pp vs world | 6.1% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Cuba | 2023 | 7.1% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -19.2 pp vs world | 7.1% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Cuba | 2024 | 8.0% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -17.9 pp vs world | 8.0% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean15.6%2024
World26.0%2024
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Cuba is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
76.8% → 71.1%
Percentage-point change: -5.7 pp71.1% → 40.3%
Percentage-point change: -30.8 pp40.3% → 15.5%
Percentage-point change: -24.8 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | 32.6% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 44.2% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +32.9 pp vs world | -11.6% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 76.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +54.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | 32.6% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world | 44.2% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +32.8 pp vs world | -11.6% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 76.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +54.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | 32.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | 44.2% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | -11.6% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 76.8% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +53.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | 32.6% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 44.2% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | -11.6% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 76.8% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +50.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | 32.6% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 44.2% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +28.1 pp vs world | -11.6% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 76.8% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +44.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | 32.6% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 44.2% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +29.0 pp vs world | -11.6% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 76.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +46.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | 32.6% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 44.2% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | -11.6% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | 76.8% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +45.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | 32.6% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 44.2% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +28.1 pp vs world | -11.6% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 76.8% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +44.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | 32.6% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 44.2% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +28.4 pp vs world | -11.5% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 76.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | 32.6% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 44.1% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | -11.6% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 76.7% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +42.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | 32.8% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 44.3% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world | -11.5% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 77.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +40.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | 32.6% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 44.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +25.8 pp vs world | -11.6% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 76.8% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +40.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | 32.6% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 44.2% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | -11.5% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 76.8% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +42.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | 32.5% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +16.1 pp vs world | 44.0% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +27.2 pp vs world | -11.4% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 76.5% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +43.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | 32.3% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 44.1% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | -11.8% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 76.4% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +42.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | 33.7% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 45.0% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +28.3 pp vs world | -11.3% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 78.7% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | 31.7% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +15.9 pp vs world | 43.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +27.7 pp vs world | -12.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 75.5% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | 32.9% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world | 43.9% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +27.3 pp vs world | -11.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 76.8% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +43.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | 32.0% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 43.1% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world | -11.1% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 75.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +41.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | 31.2% | 81 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 44.8% | 61 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | -13.6% | 144 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 75.9% | 72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | +40.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | 30.2% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 40.9% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | -10.6% | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 71.1% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +33.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | 21.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 29.1% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | -7.1% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 51.0% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | 16.9% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 18.2% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | -1.3% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 35.1% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | 13.2% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 15.7% | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -2.5% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 28.9% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | 13.2% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 14.5% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | -1.3% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 27.8% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | 13.4% | 178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 15.9% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | -2.5% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 29.3% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | 15.3% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 17.3% | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -2.0% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 32.6% | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | 14.9% | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 17.8% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | -2.9% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 32.8% | 186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | 14.3% | 178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 18.3% | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -4.0% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 32.5% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | 14.5% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 17.3% | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | -2.8% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 31.9% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | 14.1% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 16.9% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | -2.8% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 31.1% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | 13.2% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 16.1% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | -2.9% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 29.4% | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -16.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | 11.5% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 13.2% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | -1.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 24.7% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -21.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | 13.0% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 13.6% | 200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | -0.7% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 26.6% | 201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -21.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | 16.0% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 15.3% | 200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 0.7% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 31.3% | 198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -19.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | 21.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 18.3% | 198 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 39.4% | 190 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | 18.7% | 176 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.5 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 18.5% | 201 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 37.2% | 197 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -19.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | 20.3% | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 17.6% | 203 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 2.7% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 38.0% | 196 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | 20.6% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 24.3% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | -3.8% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 44.9% | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | 17.5% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 15.5% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 2.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 32.9% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -19.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | 22.6% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 17.7% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 4.8% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 40.3% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | 25.1% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 21.9% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 3.2% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 47.0% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | 25.5% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 20.4% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 5.2% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 45.9% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | 24.1% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 20.2% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 3.9% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 44.3% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | 22.1% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 17.2% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -11.8 pp vs world | 4.9% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 39.3% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | 17.1% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 14.5% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 2.7% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.6% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -24.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | 15.0% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 12.3% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 27.3% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -26.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | 14.5% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 11.7% | 208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -15.7 pp vs world | 2.9% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 26.2% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -29.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | 14.5% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 12.6% | 208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -15.7 pp vs world | 2.0% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 27.1% | 207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -30.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | 12.2% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 10.6% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 22.8% | 209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -32.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | 8.2% | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -17.9 pp vs world | 7.5% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -17.9 pp vs world | 0.7% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 15.7% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -35.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | 5.5% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -23.2 pp vs world | 4.8% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -22.8 pp vs world | 0.7% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 10.3% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -46.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | 6.4% | 207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -24.5 pp vs world | 5.7% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -24.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 12.1% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -48.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | 7.2% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -21.9 pp vs world | 8.0% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -20.3 pp vs world | -0.8% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 15.2% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -42.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | 6.7% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -22.3 pp vs world | 8.8% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -19.3 pp vs world | -2.1% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 15.5% | 210 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -41.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
Caribbean56.5%2024
World57.1%2024
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 44.2%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
1970–1990+0.6 pp1990–2010-7.2 pp2010–2024-0.8 pp
World specialization: 0.68×
1970–1990-1.0 pp1990–2010+5.5 pp2010–2024-8.8 pp
World specialization: 0.44×
1970–1990+0.8 pp1990–2010-2.6 pp2010–2024+5.0 pp
World specialization: 1.73×
1970–1990-0.8 pp1990–2010-3.6 pp2010–2024+2.7 pp
World specialization: 1.84×
1970–1990-1.2 pp1990–2010-0.3 pp2010–2024-1.2 pp
World specialization: 0.73×
1970–1990+1.6 pp1990–2010+8.1 pp2010–2024+3.1 pp
World specialization: 0.99×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
31.3% → 32.9%
Percentage-point change: +1.6 pp32.9% → 41.1%
Percentage-point change: +8.1 pp41.1% → 44.2%
Percentage-point change: +3.1 ppHow to read specialization
World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Agriculture, forestry and fishing0.68×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities0.44×
Construction1.73×
Trade, restaurants and hotels1.84×
Transport, storage and communication0.73×
Other activities0.99×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | 10.2% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 13.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world | 6.8% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 28.2% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.3% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | 10.2% | 120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 13.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -17.0 pp vs world | 6.8% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 28.2% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.3% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | 10.2% | 119 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 13.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 6.8% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 28.2% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 31.3% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | 10.2% | 112 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 13.6% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world | 6.8% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 28.2% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 9.9% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 31.3% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | 10.2% | 110 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 13.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world | 6.8% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.2% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 31.3% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | 10.2% | 109 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 13.6% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -17.1 pp vs world | 6.8% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 28.2% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 9.9% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 31.3% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | 10.2% | 109 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 13.6% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -17.3 pp vs world | 6.8% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 28.2% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 9.9% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.3% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | 10.2% | 107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 13.6% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -17.2 pp vs world | 6.8% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.2% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 9.9% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 31.3% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | 10.2% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 6.8% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 28.1% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 10.0% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 31.3% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | 10.2% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 13.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -17.2 pp vs world | 6.8% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 28.0% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 10.0% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.4% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | 10.1% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 13.6% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 6.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.5% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world | 9.9% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.1% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | 10.2% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 13.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -17.0 pp vs world | 6.9% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 28.3% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 9.9% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 31.2% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | 10.2% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 13.6% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world | 6.7% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 28.1% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 10.0% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.4% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | 10.3% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 13.6% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 6.7% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 27.7% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 10.1% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 31.6% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | 10.4% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 13.5% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -15.7 pp vs world | 6.7% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 27.5% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 10.1% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 31.8% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | 9.5% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 13.6% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -15.2 pp vs world | 7.1% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 30.8% | 14 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +16.0 pp vs world | 9.5% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 29.6% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | 10.5% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 13.8% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 7.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 27.5% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | 9.8% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 31.3% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | 10.6% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 13.4% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 6.1% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 27.0% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 10.5% | 24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 32.4% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | 10.8% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 13.7% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 26.0% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 10.4% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 32.7% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | 10.6% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 13.3% | 136 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 24.2 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 6.9% | 47 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 26.1% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 10.1% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 33.0% | 78 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | 10.8% | 118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 12.5% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 7.6% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 27.4% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 8.7% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 32.9% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | 10.6% | 117 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 13.8% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 6.5% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 20.7% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 8.9% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 39.4% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | 10.6% | 113 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 44.8 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 15.8% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 17.0% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 8.1% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 43.0% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | 8.2% | 122 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 15.4% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 5.3% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 18.7% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 7.1% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 45.3% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | 7.2% | 130 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 18.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 4.8% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 26.1% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 6.3% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 36.7% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | 6.4% | 136 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 21.0% | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 4.9% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 28.7% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 6.1% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 32.8% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | 7.2% | 125 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 21.0% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 6.1% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 26.3% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 32.5% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | 7.3% | 122 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 21.8% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 6.2% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 25.5% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 7.0% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 32.3% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | 6.2% | 132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 35.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 20.3% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 6.0% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 26.7% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 8.1% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 32.7% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | 6.2% | 131 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 36.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 19.9% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 5.8% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 25.6% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 8.8% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 33.6% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | 6.7% | 119 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 41.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 20.0% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 5.8% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 25.2% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 9.3% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 32.9% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | 6.5% | 122 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 19.7% | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 5.5% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 25.7% | 18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 91.7 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 9.4% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 33.2% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | 6.0% | 125 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 18.8% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 5.2% | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 25.9% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 9.2% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 34.9% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | 5.8% | 129 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 17.7% | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 5.1% | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 26.2% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 8.9% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 36.4% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | 5.5% | 127 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 17.0% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 5.3% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 25.0% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 8.8% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 38.4% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | 4.4% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 16.1% | 139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 5.7% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 23.9% | 17 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 8.9% | 108 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 41.0% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | 3.4% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 16.1% | 135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 27.6% | 10 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 7.9% | 131 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 38.6% | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | 4.0% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 17.2% | 127 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 39.1 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 5.6% | 116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 25.9% | 13 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 7.9% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 39.5% | 70 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | 3.9% | 135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 17.2% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 5.5% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 24.1% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 8.2% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 41.0% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | 4.0% | 137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 17.3% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 5.5% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 23.5% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 41.3% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | 3.7% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 18.1% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 5.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 23.8% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 41.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | 3.6% | 139 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 17.7% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 4.8% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 23.7% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 8.2% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 41.9% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | 3.9% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 18.5% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 5.1% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 23.5% | 19 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 40.6% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | 4.0% | 132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 18.1% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 5.3% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 23.7% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 8.3% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 40.6% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | 4.0% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 17.4% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 5.0% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 23.9% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 8.6% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 41.2% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | 3.9% | 135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 17.1% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 5.4% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 24.0% | 22 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 8.7% | 122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 40.9% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | 4.0% | 131 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 16.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 7.1% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 24.8% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 9.3% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 38.7% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | 3.8% | 135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 15.7% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 8.9% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 25.3% | 20 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 9.2% | 104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 37.0% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | 3.8% | 129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 15.0% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 10.1% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 25.0% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 9.1% | 105 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 36.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | 3.6% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 14.7% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 10.2% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 24.0% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 8.5% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 38.9% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | 2.8% | 150 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 13.0% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 10.1% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 20.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 6.8% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 46.8% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | 2.0% | 162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 9.3% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 8.5% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 15.8% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 5.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 59.4% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | 1.8% | 167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 9.6% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | 8.9% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 18.6% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 6.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 55.0% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | 3.2% | 136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 9.6% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 24.6% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 6.8% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 45.9% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | 2.9% | 143 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 9.3% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 10.0% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 26.5% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 7.1% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 44.2% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 8.4% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Cuba was 7.3 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 8.4%
- World specialization
- 0.54×
- Latest year
- 2024
11.4% → 10.2%
Percentage-point change: -1.2 pp10.2% → 15.8%
Percentage-point change: +5.6 pp15.8% → 8.4%
Percentage-point change: -7.4 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Cuba | 1970 | 11.4% | 96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -14.5 pp vs world | 84.1% | 74 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.1% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1971 | 11.4% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 84.2% | 72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 8.6% | 45 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 74.9 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1972 | 11.4% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 84.2% | 72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 4.8% | 96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1973 | 11.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -14.2 pp vs world | 84.1% | 77 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 3.4% | 130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1974 | 11.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world | 84.1% | 74 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1975 | 11.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | 84.2% | 68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 9.6% | 29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1976 | 11.4% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 84.2% | 69 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 5.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1977 | 11.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 84.2% | 67 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 8.6% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1978 | 11.4% | 98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 84.1% | 68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 6.5% | 75 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1979 | 11.4% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -12.4 pp vs world | 83.9% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 0.9% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1980 | 11.5% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 84.4% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | -4.1% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1981 | 11.5% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 84.4% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 19.3% | 10 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1982 | 11.4% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 84.0% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 8.4% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1983 | 11.4% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 83.7% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1984 | 11.3% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 83.2% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 7.5% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1985 | 11.8% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 86.7% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 7.0% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1986 | 11.6% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 84.4% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | -5.7% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1987 | 11.0% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 81.9% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | -3.7% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1988 | 11.2% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 82.2% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 5.4% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1989 | 10.8% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 80.9% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | -1.1% | 142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1990 | 10.2% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 81.5% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | -5.0% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1991 | 11.2% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 81.0% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | -9.5% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1992 | 13.1% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 83.2% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | -16.5% | 180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -16.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1993 | 13.2% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 86.1% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | -11.5% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1994 | 17.0% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 89.9% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 7.6% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1995 | 18.5% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 88.2% | 33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.3 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 6.4% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1996 | 17.9% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 85.4% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 7.9% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1997 | 18.6% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 85.2% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 6.2% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1998 | 17.1% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 84.6% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | -8.1% | 191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 1999 | 16.8% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 84.5% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 7.2% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2000 | 16.6% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 83.1% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 5.1% | 104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2001 | 16.3% | 79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 82.7% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | -0.6% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2002 | 15.5% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 82.6% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2003 | 14.4% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 81.3% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | -2.0% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2004 | 13.9% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 82.1% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 2.5% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -17.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2005 | 14.1% | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 87.3% | 29 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 9.5% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2006 | 13.6% | 96 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 84.4% | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 4.7% | 109 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 47.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2007 | 14.7% | 82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 85.2% | 42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 9.6% | 45 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2008 | 14.9% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 86.5% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world | 5.2% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2009 | 15.1% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 87.3% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 0.9% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2010 | 15.8% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 87.3% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 1.1% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2011 | 15.5% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 87.5% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +18.2 pp vs world | 3.9% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2012 | 16.3% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 88.1% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 2.2% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2013 | 15.9% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 87.9% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world | 2.1% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2014 | 15.2% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 87.6% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +15.9 pp vs world | -3.6% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2015 | 15.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 87.9% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 6.3% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2016 | 14.0% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 86.9% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | -5.2% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2017 | 13.6% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 86.8% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | -1.1% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2018 | 13.0% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 86.3% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | -0.9% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2019 | 12.7% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 86.0% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | -6.1% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2020 | 11.3% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 86.5% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | -14.6% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2021 | 8.0% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 86.6% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | -15.8% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -24.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2022 | 8.4% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 87.4% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | -6.8% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2023 | 8.7% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 89.7% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world | -6.9% | 191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Cuba | 2024 | 8.4% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 90.6% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world | -10.1% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization
Caribbean0.49×
World0.54×