Three fixed historical periods

Read the economy through three eras

Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.

Formation1970–1990

Integration1990–2010

Current era2010–2024

01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$2.19T2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 10 of 210

Real GDP growth3.4%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change

GDP per capita$10,3112024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted

Share of world GDP2.0%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator

Largest broad activity49.7%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities

Manufacturing14.1%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap −1.6 pp

Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table

Brazil	1970	$35.38B	15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.1 / 100	1.0 (world = 100)	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	$371	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	40.0 (world = 100)	1.0%	15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.1 / 100	-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	$39.52B	16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100	1.0 (world = 100)	11.3%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	$404	106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	40.4 (world = 100)	1.0%	16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100	-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	$50.86B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.2 (world = 100)	11.9%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	$508	97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.8 / 100	44.9 (world = 100)	1.2%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	$72.01B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	14.0%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	$702	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	$92.32B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	8.2%	38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.1 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	$879	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	58.6 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	$108.56B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.6 (world = 100)	5.2%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	$1,009	84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	61.3 (world = 100)	1.6%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	$128.35B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	10.3%	37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.7 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	$1,165	77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	66.7 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	$149.38B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	4.9%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	$1,323	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	68.5 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	$169.60B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	5.0%	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$1,467	78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	65.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	$186.98B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	6.8%	51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	$1,579	84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	62.1 (world = 100)	1.7%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	$176.17B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	9.2%	25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	$1,453	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	$224.38B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	-4.2%	157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	$1,809	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	64.6 (world = 100)	1.8%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	$245.73B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	0.8%	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	$1,936	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	70.9 (world = 100)	2.0%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	$173.01B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.3 (world = 100)	-2.9%	147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	17.5 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	$1,333	96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	48.5 (world = 100)	1.3%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	$176.31B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.3 (world = 100)	5.4%	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	$1,329	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	47.9 (world = 100)	1.3%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	$188.21B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	7.8%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	$1,389	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	49.6 (world = 100)	1.4%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	$226.41B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	7.5%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	$1,637	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	51.6 (world = 100)	1.4%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	$248.29B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	3.5%	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$1,760	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	50.0 (world = 100)	1.4%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	$277.35B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	-0.1%	151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	$1,928	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	49.8 (world = 100)	1.4%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	$377.26B	10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	3.2%	107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	$2,575	71 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	60.7 / 100	64.8 (world = 100)	1.8%	10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	$408.82B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	-4.4%	167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	6.7 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	$2,741	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	63.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	$379.16B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	1.6 (world = 100)	0.7%	126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	$2,499	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	55.8 (world = 100)	1.6%	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	$362.04B	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	-1.3%	152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	$2,347	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	49.7 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	$404.96B	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	4.5%	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	$2,583	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	54.5 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	$575.83B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	5.5%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	$3,616	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	72.6 (world = 100)	2.0%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	$769.33B	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	2.5 (world = 100)	3.9%	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	$4,757	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	87.5 (world = 100)	2.5%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	$850.43B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	2.2%	150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	$5,179	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	94.6 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	$883.21B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.8 (world = 100)	3.4%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	$5,299	68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.3 / 100	98.6 (world = 100)	2.8%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	$863.71B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	0.3%	166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	$5,106	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	96.9 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	$599.64B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	0.5%	161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	$3,494	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	64.7 (world = 100)	1.8%	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	$655.45B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	4.4%	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$3,767	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	68.6 (world = 100)	1.9%	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	$559.98B	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	1.4%	146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	$3,176	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	59.0 (world = 100)	1.7%	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	$509.80B	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	3.1%	107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	$2,856	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	51.6 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	$558.23B	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	1.1%	164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	$3,091	95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	50.5 (world = 100)	1.4%	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	$669.29B	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	5.8%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	$3,664	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	53.8 (world = 100)	1.5%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	$891.63B	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	3.2%	138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	33.2 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	$4,828	91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	66.3 (world = 100)	1.9%	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	$1.11T	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	4.0%	147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	$5,934	86 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	76.1 (world = 100)	2.1%	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	$1.40T	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.4 (world = 100)	6.1%	97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	$7,410	82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	60.9 / 100	85.3 (world = 100)	2.4%	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	$1.70T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.6 (world = 100)	5.1%	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	$8,908	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	94.6 (world = 100)	2.6%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	$1.67T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	-0.1%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	$8,679	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	98.4 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	$2.21T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.3 (world = 100)	7.5%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	$11,403	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	119.5 (world = 100)	3.3%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	$2.62T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.5 (world = 100)	4.0%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	$13,397	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	127.8 (world = 100)	3.5%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	$2.47T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.2 (world = 100)	1.9%	125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	$12,522	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	118.5 (world = 100)	3.2%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	$2.47T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.2 (world = 100)	3.0%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	$12,459	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	115.9 (world = 100)	3.2%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	$2.46T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.1 (world = 100)	0.5%	182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.4 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	$12,275	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	112.6 (world = 100)	3.1%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	$1.80T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.4 (world = 100)	-3.5%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	$8,936	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	87.7 (world = 100)	2.4%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	$1.80T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	-3.3%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	$8,836	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	86.4 (world = 100)	2.3%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	$2.06T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.5 (world = 100)	1.3%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	$10,081	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	93.6 (world = 100)	2.5%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	$1.92T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	$9,301	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	82.3 (world = 100)	2.2%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	$1.87T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	1.2%	158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	$9,030	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	79.6 (world = 100)	2.1%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	$1.48T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	-3.3%	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	$7,074	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	64.5 (world = 100)	1.7%	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	$1.67T	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	4.8%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	$7,973	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	64.2 (world = 100)	1.7%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	$1.95T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	3.0%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	$9,281	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	72.5 (world = 100)	1.9%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	$2.19T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	3.2%	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	$10,378	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	78.3 (world = 100)	2.0%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	$2.19T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	3.4%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$10,311	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	75.4 (world = 100)	2.0%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars

Formation1970–1990

$35.38B → $408.82B

Compound annual change: +13.0% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$408.82B → $2.21T

Compound annual change: +8.8% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$2.21T → $2.19T

Compound annual change: -0.1% CAGR

Nominal GDP$2.19T2024 · Published series · World rank 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP$1.70T2024 · Published series · World rank 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world GDP2.0%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	$35.38B	15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.1 / 100	1.0 (world = 100)	$293.62B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	1.0%	15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.1 / 100	-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	$39.52B	16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100	1.0 (world = 100)	$326.91B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.6 (world = 100)	1.0%	16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100	-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	$50.86B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.2 (world = 100)	$365.95B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	1.2%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	$72.01B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$417.07B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	$92.32B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	$451.06B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	$108.56B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.6 (world = 100)	$474.38B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	1.6%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	$128.35B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$523.05B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	$149.38B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$548.84B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	$169.60B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$576.12B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	$186.98B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	$615.06B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.7%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	$176.17B	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$671.83B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.4 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	$224.38B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$643.28B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	1.8%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	$245.73B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	$648.62B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	2.0%	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	$173.01B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.3 (world = 100)	$629.61B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	1.3%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	$176.31B	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.3 (world = 100)	$663.61B	8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.3%	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	$188.21B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$715.70B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.4%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	$226.41B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$769.31B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	1.4%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	$248.29B	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$796.46B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	1.4%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	$277.35B	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$795.99B	9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.4%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	$377.26B	10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$821.14B	9 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	95.5 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	1.8%	10 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	$408.82B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$785.42B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	1.8%	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	$379.16B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	1.6 (world = 100)	$790.97B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.6%	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	$362.04B	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$781.07B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.4%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	$404.96B	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	$816.23B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	$575.83B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	$861.23B	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	2.0%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	$769.33B	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	2.5 (world = 100)	$894.74B	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	2.5%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	$850.43B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	$914.51B	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	$883.21B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.8 (world = 100)	$945.55B	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	2.8%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	$863.71B	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	$948.75B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	$599.64B	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	$953.19B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.8%	11 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	$655.45B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	$995.01B	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.9%	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	$559.98B	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	$1.01T	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.7%	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	$509.80B	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	$1.04T	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	1.5%	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	$558.23B	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	1.4 (world = 100)	$1.05T	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.4%	15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	$669.29B	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	1.5 (world = 100)	$1.11T	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.5%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	$891.63B	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	$1.15T	11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	1.9%	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	$1.11T	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	$1.19T	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	2.1%	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	$1.40T	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.4 (world = 100)	$1.27T	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	2.4%	10 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	$1.70T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.6 (world = 100)	$1.33T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	2.6%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	$1.67T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.7 (world = 100)	$1.33T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	2.7%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	$2.21T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.3 (world = 100)	$1.43T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	3.3%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	$2.62T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.5 (world = 100)	$1.49T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	3.5%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	$2.47T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.2 (world = 100)	$1.51T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	3.2%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	$2.47T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.2 (world = 100)	$1.56T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	3.2%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	$2.46T	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	3.1 (world = 100)	$1.57T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	3.1%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-96.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	$1.80T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.4 (world = 100)	$1.51T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	2.4%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	$1.80T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.3 (world = 100)	$1.46T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	2.3%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	$2.06T	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	2.5 (world = 100)	$1.48T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.8 (world = 100)	2.5%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	$1.92T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.2 (world = 100)	$1.51T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	2.2%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	$1.87T	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	2.1 (world = 100)	$1.53T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	2.1%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	$1.48T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	$1.48T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	1.7%	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	$1.67T	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	$1.55T	12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	1.7%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	$1.95T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.9 (world = 100)	$1.59T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	1.9%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	$2.19T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	$1.64T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	2.0%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	$2.19T	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	2.0 (world = 100)	$1.70T	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	1.7 (world = 100)	2.0%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

South America$4.34T2024

World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person

Formation1970–1990

$371 → $2,741

Compound annual change: +10.5% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$2,741 → $11,403

Compound annual change: +7.4% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$11,403 → $10,311

Compound annual change: -0.7% CAGR

GDP per person$10,3112024 · Published series · World rank 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP per person$8,0232024 · Published series · World rank 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	$371	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	40.0 (world = 100)	$3,079	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	59.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	1971	$404	106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	40.4 (world = 100)	$3,345	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	63.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	1972	$508	97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.8 / 100	44.9 (world = 100)	$3,654	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	66.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	1973	$702	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)	$4,065	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	71.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	1974	$879	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	58.6 (world = 100)	$4,292	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	75.0 (world = 100)
Brazil	1975	$1,009	84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	61.3 (world = 100)	$4,408	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	77.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	1976	$1,165	77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	66.7 (world = 100)	$4,746	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	81.0 (world = 100)
Brazil	1977	$1,323	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	68.5 (world = 100)	$4,862	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	81.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	1978	$1,467	78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	65.2 (world = 100)	$4,984	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	81.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	1979	$1,579	84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	62.1 (world = 100)	$5,196	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	82.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	1980	$1,453	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)	$5,543	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	88.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	1981	$1,809	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	64.6 (world = 100)	$5,185	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	82.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	1982	$1,936	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	70.9 (world = 100)	$5,110	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	82.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	1983	$1,333	96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	48.5 (world = 100)	$4,851	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	77.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	1984	$1,329	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	47.9 (world = 100)	$5,002	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	77.6 (world = 100)
Brazil	1985	$1,389	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	49.6 (world = 100)	$5,281	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	80.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	1986	$1,637	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	51.6 (world = 100)	$5,561	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	83.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	1987	$1,760	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	50.0 (world = 100)	$5,644	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	83.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	1988	$1,928	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	49.8 (world = 100)	$5,534	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	79.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	1989	$2,575	71 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	60.7 / 100	64.8 (world = 100)	$5,605	76 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	79.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	1990	$2,741	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	63.2 (world = 100)	$5,266	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	73.6 (world = 100)
Brazil	1991	$2,499	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	55.8 (world = 100)	$5,213	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	73.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	1992	$2,347	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	49.7 (world = 100)	$5,063	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	70.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	1993	$2,583	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	54.5 (world = 100)	$5,206	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	72.6 (world = 100)
Brazil	1994	$3,616	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	72.6 (world = 100)	$5,408	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	74.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	1995	$4,757	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	87.5 (world = 100)	$5,532	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	74.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	1996	$5,179	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	94.6 (world = 100)	$5,569	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	73.6 (world = 100)
Brazil	1997	$5,299	68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.3 / 100	98.6 (world = 100)	$5,673	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	73.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	1998	$5,106	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	96.9 (world = 100)	$5,609	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	71.4 (world = 100)
Brazil	1999	$3,494	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	64.7 (world = 100)	$5,553	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	69.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	2000	$3,767	86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	68.6 (world = 100)	$5,718	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	69.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	2001	$3,176	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	59.0 (world = 100)	$5,722	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	68.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	2002	$2,856	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	51.6 (world = 100)	$5,824	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	69.3 (world = 100)
Brazil	2003	$3,091	95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	50.5 (world = 100)	$5,822	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	68.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	2004	$3,664	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	53.8 (world = 100)	$6,088	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	69.1 (world = 100)
Brazil	2005	$4,828	91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	66.3 (world = 100)	$6,214	95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	68.7 (world = 100)
Brazil	2006	$5,934	86 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	76.1 (world = 100)	$6,392	95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	68.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	2007	$7,410	82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	60.9 / 100	85.3 (world = 100)	$6,712	95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	69.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	2008	$8,908	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	94.6 (world = 100)	$6,987	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	72.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	2009	$8,679	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	98.4 (world = 100)	$6,916	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	73.4 (world = 100)
Brazil	2010	$11,403	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	119.5 (world = 100)	$7,374	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	75.9 (world = 100)
Brazil	2011	$13,397	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	127.8 (world = 100)	$7,605	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	76.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	2012	$12,522	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	118.5 (world = 100)	$7,689	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	76.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	2013	$12,459	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	115.9 (world = 100)	$7,856	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	77.0 (world = 100)
Brazil	2014	$12,275	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	112.6 (world = 100)	$7,832	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	75.4 (world = 100)
Brazil	2015	$8,936	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	87.7 (world = 100)	$7,495	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	70.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	2016	$8,836	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	86.4 (world = 100)	$7,194	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	66.9 (world = 100)
Brazil	2017	$10,081	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	93.6 (world = 100)	$7,236	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	65.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	2018	$9,301	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	82.3 (world = 100)	$7,315	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	65.2 (world = 100)
Brazil	2019	$9,030	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	79.6 (world = 100)	$7,356	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	64.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	2020	$7,074	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	64.5 (world = 100)	$7,074	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	64.5 (world = 100)
Brazil	2021	$7,973	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	64.2 (world = 100)	$7,380	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	63.8 (world = 100)
Brazil	2022	$9,281	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	72.5 (world = 100)	$7,575	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	63.9 (world = 100)
Brazil	2023	$10,378	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	78.3 (world = 100)	$7,790	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	64.4 (world = 100)
Brazil	2024	$10,311	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	75.4 (world = 100)	$8,023	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	65.1 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

South America$9,9682024

World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

11.3% → -4.4%

Average annual rate: +5.2%

Integration1990–2010

-4.4% → 7.5%

Average annual rate: +2.7%

Current era2010–2024

7.5% → 3.4%

Average annual rate: +1.7%

Real GDP growth3.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP-per-person growth3.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Implicit GDP deflator134.32024 · Published series · World rank 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	0.0	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100
Brazil	1971	11.3%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	8.6%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	0.0	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100
Brazil	1972	11.9%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	9.2%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	0.0	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100
Brazil	1973	14.0%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	11.2%	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	0.0	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100
Brazil	1974	8.2%	38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.1 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	5.6%	43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.3 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	0.0	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100
Brazil	1975	5.2%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	2.7%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1976	10.3%	37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.7 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	7.7%	35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.8 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1977	4.9%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	2.5%	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1978	5.0%	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	2.5%	109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1979	6.8%	51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	4.3%	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1980	9.2%	25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	6.7%	25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1981	-4.2%	157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	-6.5%	157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1982	0.8%	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	-1.4%	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1983	-2.9%	147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	17.5 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	-5.1%	145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	18.6 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100
Brazil	1984	5.4%	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	3.1%	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	0.0	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1985	7.8%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	5.6%	27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	0.0	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1986	7.5%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	5.3%	32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	82.5 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	0.0	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1987	3.5%	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	1.5%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	0.0	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1988	-0.1%	151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	-2.0%	147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	17.5 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	0.0	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1989	3.2%	107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	1.3%	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	0.0	176 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100
Brazil	1990	-4.4%	167 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	6.7 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	-6.0%	168 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	6.2 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	0.0	196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100
Brazil	1991	0.7%	126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	-1.0%	115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.4 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	0.0	194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100
Brazil	1992	-1.3%	152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	-2.9%	148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	28.3 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	0.0	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100
Brazil	1993	4.5%	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	2.8%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	0.4	190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	7.8 / 100
Brazil	1994	5.5%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	3.9%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	8.6	166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100
Brazil	1995	3.9%	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	2.3%	105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	15.3	162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100
Brazil	1996	2.2%	150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	0.7%	148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	28.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	18.1	159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.9 / 100
Brazil	1997	3.4%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	1.9%	125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	19.5	161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100
Brazil	1998	0.3%	166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	-1.1%	165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.0 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	20.5	163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100
Brazil	1999	0.5%	161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	-1.0%	161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	22.1	167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.0 / 100
Brazil	2000	4.4%	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	3.0%	106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	23.4	167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.0 / 100
Brazil	2001	1.4%	146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	0.1%	145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.8 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	25.3	167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.0 / 100
Brazil	2002	3.1%	107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	1.8%	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	27.8	167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.0 / 100
Brazil	2003	1.1%	164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	-0.0%	162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	31.7	162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100
Brazil	2004	5.8%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	4.6%	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	34.1	162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100
Brazil	2005	3.2%	138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	33.2 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	2.1%	132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	36.7	167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	19.8 / 100
Brazil	2006	4.0%	147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	2.9%	129 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	38.2 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	39.2	167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	19.8 / 100
Brazil	2007	6.1%	97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	5.0%	81 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	61.4 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	41.7	171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	17.9 / 100
Brazil	2008	5.1%	78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	62.8 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	4.1%	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	45.4	172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100
Brazil	2009	-0.1%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	-1.0%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	48.7	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100
Brazil	2010	7.5%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	6.6%	36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	52.8	177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100
Brazil	2011	4.0%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	3.1%	91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	57.2	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100
Brazil	2012	1.9%	125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	1.1%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	61.7	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100
Brazil	2013	3.0%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	2.2%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	66.3	179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100
Brazil	2014	0.5%	182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.4 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	-0.3%	180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	71.5	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100
Brazil	2015	-3.5%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	-4.3%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	76.9	170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100
Brazil	2016	-3.3%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	-4.0%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	83.2	158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100
Brazil	2017	1.3%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	0.6%	158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	86.2	170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100
Brazil	2018	1.8%	157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	1.1%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	90.1	169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100
Brazil	2019	1.2%	158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	0.6%	148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	29.7 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	93.9	177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100
Brazil	2020	-3.3%	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	-3.8%	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	100.0	1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	100.0 / 100
Brazil	2021	4.8%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	4.3%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	113.0	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100
Brazil	2022	3.0%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	2.6%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	122.7	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100
Brazil	2023	3.2%	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	2.8%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	129.1	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100
Brazil	2024	3.4%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	3.0%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	134.3	56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

South America2.6%2024

World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

80.4% → 78.8%

Percentage-point change: -1.6 pp

Integration1990–2010

78.8% → 79.2%

Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp

Current era2010–2024

79.2% → 82.7%

Percentage-point change: +3.5 pp

Final consumption82.7%2024 · Published series · World rank 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Household consumption64.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Government consumption18.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Domestic demand99.7%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	80.4%	91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.2 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world	69.0%	76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	+11.9 pp vs world	11.5%	120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	99.6%	126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	80.4%	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	69.3%	78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	56.3 / 100	+12.3 pp vs world	11.1%	129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	100.6%	115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	35.2 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	80.4%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	69.6%	71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	60.2 / 100	+12.8 pp vs world	10.8%	133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	101.1%	104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	79.9%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	+8.2 pp vs world	69.9%	65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+14.0 pp vs world	10.0%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	101.1%	106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	40.3 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	81.5%	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	72.3%	57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	68.2 / 100	+16.6 pp vs world	9.3%	147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.0 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	105.0%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	78.6%	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	68.3%	74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	+11.7 pp vs world	10.3%	144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.8 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	103.3%	105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	79.7%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	69.2%	66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	63.1 / 100	+13.1 pp vs world	10.5%	138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.2 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	101.8%	112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.9 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	79.1%	91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.2 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	69.6%	65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world	9.5%	150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	100.3%	119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	78.6%	100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.1 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	68.9%	72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	59.7 / 100	+12.9 pp vs world	9.7%	151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	100.7%	120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	79.4%	89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	69.4%	60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world	9.9%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	101.5%	108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	91.2%	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+18.1 pp vs world	82.2%	32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+25.7 pp vs world	9.0%	151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	117.3%	43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	76.1 / 100	+16.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	78.2%	113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	36.7 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	67.0%	81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	+10.5 pp vs world	11.1%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	99.5%	140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	79.4%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	68.8%	72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	59.7 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world	10.6%	148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	16.5 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	99.5%	133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	81.8%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	72.5%	61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+14.6 pp vs world	9.3%	153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	13.6 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world	97.4%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	79.4%	99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	70.9%	60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	+13.2 pp vs world	8.5%	156 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	94.3%	151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	76.2%	119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	66.1%	79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	9.9%	155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	12.5 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	94.5%	143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.3 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	78.9%	101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	43.5 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	68.2%	71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	60.2 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world	10.7%	143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.3 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	97.2%	135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	74.8%	129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	27.7 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	62.6%	97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	12.2%	125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	96.2%	138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.2 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	72.3%	136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	23.7 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	59.7%	102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	12.6%	123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	94.2%	147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.0 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	72.3%	133 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	25.8 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	57.9%	112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	14.4%	99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	96.1%	139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	78.8%	113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	61.1%	113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.1 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	17.7%	87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	57.8 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	98.0%	143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	30.4 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	83.2%	96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	64.5%	102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	18.8%	81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	99.4%	136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.8 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	82.5%	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	64.6%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	17.9%	86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	97.8%	153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.5 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	82.2%	106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	63.5%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	18.7%	81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	98.8%	143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	30.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	82.4%	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	63.3%	102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	19.0%	70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	99.9%	129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	84.6%	79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	+9.7 pp vs world	63.7%	110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	20.9%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	101.9%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	84.9%	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world	65.2%	100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.5 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	19.8%	63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	102.2%	112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.6 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	84.8%	87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	65.3%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	19.5%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world	102.6%	111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.1 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	84.2%	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	64.1%	106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	48.5 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	20.1%	61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	102.4%	128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	37.7 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	84.5%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	64.7%	107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	19.8%	57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	101.9%	124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.7 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	83.4%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	64.6%	102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	18.8%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	102.3%	114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	83.5%	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	64.1%	111 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	46.1 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	19.3%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	102.2%	113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.1 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	81.7%	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	61.9%	115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	44.1 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	19.8%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	99.2%	131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	36.3 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	80.9%	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	61.8%	120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	19.1%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	97.8%	146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	28.9 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	78.7%	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	60.2%	124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.7 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	18.5%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	96.6%	151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.5 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	79.4%	111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	60.5%	122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	18.9%	55 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	73.8 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	96.6%	149 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	28.2 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	79.5%	105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	60.4%	121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	19.0%	51 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	75.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	97.3%	140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	78.8%	111 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	59.9%	120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	18.9%	51 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	75.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	98.6%	141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	32.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	78.6%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	59.7%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	18.8%	55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	74.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	100.2%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	81.6%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	62.0%	116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	44.7 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	19.7%	67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	100.4%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	79.2%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	60.2%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	19.0%	67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	101.0%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	78.9%	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	60.3%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	18.7%	71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	100.8%	123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	79.9%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	61.4%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	18.5%	79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	62.5 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	101.4%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	80.6%	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	61.7%	118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	18.9%	70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	102.3%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	82.1%	100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	63.0%	110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.6 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	19.2%	70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	102.7%	112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	83.7%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+10.0 pp vs world	64.0%	103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	19.8%	60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	101.2%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	84.6%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	+10.8 pp vs world	64.3%	100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	20.4%	50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.4 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	99.6%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	84.7%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	+11.3 pp vs world	64.5%	99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	20.2%	49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.9 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	99.3%	131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	84.5%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	+11.7 pp vs world	64.6%	101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.9 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world	19.9%	51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	76.0 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	99.6%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	85.1%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	+12.1 pp vs world	65.1%	97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.8 / 100	+8.8 pp vs world	20.0%	58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	72.6 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	100.6%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	83.3%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world	63.1%	106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world	20.1%	80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	62.0 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	99.4%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	79.9%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	61.4%	114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.7 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	18.5%	87 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	58.7 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	99.4%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	81.5%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	63.1%	109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.1 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	18.4%	78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	63.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	99.6%	137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	82.0%	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	62.9%	106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	19.0%	72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	97.7%	143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.7 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	82.7%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	64.0%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	18.8%	77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	63.5 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	99.7%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

South America82.0%2024

World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

19.2% → 19.2%

Percentage-point change: -0.0 pp

Integration1990–2010

19.2% → 21.8%

Percentage-point change: +2.6 pp

Current era2010–2024

21.8% → 17.0%

Percentage-point change: -4.8 pp

Gross capital formation17.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Gross fixed capital formation16.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Changes in inventories0.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 110 of 163 · highest-to-lowest

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	19.2%	107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.8 / 100	-8.6 pp vs world	18.5%	103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.0 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	0.6%	95 of 137 · highest-to-lowest	30.9 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	20.2%	105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	20.0%	95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	0.2%	102 of 137 · highest-to-lowest	25.7 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	20.6%	104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	20.0%	99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.3 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	0.7%	84 of 138 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	21.2%	99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.3 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	20.5%	100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	0.7%	90 of 140 · highest-to-lowest	36.0 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	23.4%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	21.8%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	1.6%	85 of 138 · highest-to-lowest	38.7 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	24.7%	83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	23.4%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	1.3%	70 of 140 · highest-to-lowest	50.4 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	22.1%	104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	22.3%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	-0.3%	110 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	21.2%	112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.9 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	21.3%	102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	-0.1%	107 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	23.2 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	22.1%	111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	22.2%	102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	-0.2%	107 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	23.2 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	22.2%	110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.1 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	23.3%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	-1.2%	121 of 142 · highest-to-lowest	14.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	26.1%	87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.1 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	27.2%	61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	-1.1%	127 of 143 · highest-to-lowest	11.3 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	21.3%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	22.2%	100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	-0.9%	124 of 144 · highest-to-lowest	14.0 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	20.2%	122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	21.0%	108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	-0.9%	121 of 145 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	15.6%	142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.9 / 100	-10.3 pp vs world	18.6%	117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	-3.0%	133 of 146 · highest-to-lowest	9.0 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	14.9%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-11.5 pp vs world	17.0%	123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	-8.3 pp vs world	-2.1%	131 of 147 · highest-to-lowest	11.0 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	18.2%	124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	16.8%	124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	1.4%	54 of 148 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	18.2%	122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	19.1%	109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.6 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	-0.7%	127 of 148 · highest-to-lowest	14.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	21.4%	98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	22.3%	80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	-0.9%	131 of 151 · highest-to-lowest	13.3 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	21.8%	97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	22.8%	79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	-0.9%	136 of 151 · highest-to-lowest	10.0 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	23.8%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	24.8%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	-1.0%	137 of 152 · highest-to-lowest	9.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	19.2%	136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.8 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	22.3%	102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	-3.1%	162 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	6.9 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	16.2%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-9.0 pp vs world	17.6%	136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.8 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	-1.4%	156 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	9.4 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	15.3%	168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	18.1 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world	17.9%	130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	36.8 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	-2.7%	155 of 167 · highest-to-lowest	7.2 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	16.7%	152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.0 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	18.9%	121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	-2.2%	148 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	13.0 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	17.5%	154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	20.5%	112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.6 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	-3.0%	155 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	8.9 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	17.3%	160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.1 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	20.3%	112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	45.6 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	-3.0%	163 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	4.7 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	17.3%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	18.6%	142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	30.9 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	-1.4%	155 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	9.4 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	17.8%	151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.5 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	19.1%	134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	34.8 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	-1.4%	158 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	8.2 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	18.2%	162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	18.5%	147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	-0.4%	143 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	15.0 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	17.4%	159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	17.0%	154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	0.4%	86 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	49.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	18.9%	148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.9 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	18.3%	138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	32.8 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	0.6%	102 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	18.7%	153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.5 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	18.4%	143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	30.4 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	0.3%	108 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	37.4 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	17.4%	162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	17.9%	152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.0 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	-0.5%	151 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	13.8 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	16.9%	162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	16.6%	160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.1 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	0.3%	120 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	31.2 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	17.9%	159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	17.3%	156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	24.0 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	0.6%	100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.1 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	17.2%	173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	16.5 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	17.1%	166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	19.9 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	0.1%	134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	17.8%	170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	18.0 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	17.2%	167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	19.4 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	0.6%	106 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	19.8%	155 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	25.2 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	18.0%	167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	19.4 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	1.8%	57 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	68.5 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	21.6%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	19.4%	157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	2.2%	51 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	18.8%	155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.0 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	19.1%	148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	-0.3%	112 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	37.6 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	21.8%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	20.5%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	1.3%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	21.8%	128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.9 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	20.6%	130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.0 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	1.2%	72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	60.1 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	21.4%	128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.9 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	20.7%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	0.7%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	21.7%	130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.0 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	20.9%	125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.4 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	0.8%	82 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	20.5%	140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	33.2 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	19.9%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	0.7%	77 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	56.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	17.4%	169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	17.8%	166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	20.7 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	-0.4%	151 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	14.3 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	15.0%	186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	11.1 / 100	-10.4 pp vs world	15.5%	179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world	-0.6%	153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	13.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	14.6%	188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	10.1 / 100	-11.3 pp vs world	14.6%	189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	9.6 / 100	-10.6 pp vs world	0.1%	141 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	15.1%	188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	10.1 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world	15.1%	188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	10.1 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world	-0.0%	150 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	15.5%	179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	15.5%	182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	13.0 / 100	-10.4 pp vs world	0.0%	139 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	20.2 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	16.1%	175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	16.3 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	16.6%	169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world	-0.4%	140 of 173 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	19.5%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	17.9%	156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	25.5 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	1.6%	60 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	65.3 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	18.1%	160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	23.6 / 100	-9.1 pp vs world	17.8%	156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	25.5 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world	0.3%	131 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	23.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	15.8%	180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world	16.4%	171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	18.3 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world	-0.7%	146 of 169 · highest-to-lowest	13.7 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	17.0%	167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	20.2 / 100	-9.0 pp vs world	16.9%	161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	23.1 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	0.1%	110 of 163 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

South America17.4%2024

World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Brazil is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

BrazilSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

14.3% → 13.5%

Percentage-point change: -0.7 pp

Integration1990–2010

13.5% → 22.8%

Percentage-point change: +9.2 pp

Current era2010–2024

22.8% → 35.6%

Percentage-point change: +12.8 pp

Exports17.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Imports17.6%2024 · Published series · World rank 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Net exports0.3%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade openness35.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Brazil	1970	7.2%	160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	7.1%	171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.0 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	0.1%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	14.3%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	6.7%	160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	7.7%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	-1.0%	64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	14.4%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	7.0%	159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.7 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	9.1%	165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	-2.1%	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	16.1%	164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.9 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	8.0%	160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	8.9%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	-0.9%	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	16.8%	165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	7.8%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world	13.2%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	-5.3%	102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	21.0%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-11.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	7.2%	165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	10.9%	166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	-3.8%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	18.1%	166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-12.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	7.0%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world	9.2%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	-2.2%	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	16.2%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-15.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	7.3%	166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	7.8%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-8.3 pp vs world	-0.5%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	15.1%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-16.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	6.7%	167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.2 / 100	-8.8 pp vs world	7.8%	173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.8 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	-1.1%	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	14.5%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-16.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	7.3%	166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-9.6 pp vs world	9.2%	171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.0 / 100	-7.9 pp vs world	-1.9%	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	16.5%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-17.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	9.1%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-9.2 pp vs world	8.9%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-9.7 pp vs world	0.2%	40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	18.0%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-18.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	11.2%	154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	13.6 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	11.0%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	0.2%	38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.1 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	22.2%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-14.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	5.3%	173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.8 / 100	-11.7 pp vs world	5.2%	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100	-12.2 pp vs world	0.1%	42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.8 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	10.5%	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100	-23.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	11.7%	148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	16.9 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	9.2%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	2.5%	30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.6 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	20.9%	164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.9 / 100	-12.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	13.5%	146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	18.1 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	7.8%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world	5.7%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	21.3%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-12.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	12.3%	150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	7.1%	175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.7 / 100	-9.5 pp vs world	5.1%	29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	19.4%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-13.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	8.9%	162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	9.0 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	6.3%	176 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	2.6%	36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.2 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	15.2%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-16.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	9.6%	162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	9.0 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	6.1%	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world	3.4%	32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	82.5 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	15.7%	174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.3 / 100	-17.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	11.0%	160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	5.7%	177 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100	-11.5 pp vs world	5.4%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	16.7%	174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.3 / 100	-17.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	8.3%	168 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	6.2 / 100	-9.1 pp vs world	5.0%	178 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	0.6 / 100	-12.8 pp vs world	3.3%	40 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	78.1 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world	13.3%	177 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	1.1 / 100	-21.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	7.6%	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100	-11.4 pp vs world	6.0%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-13.2 pp vs world	1.6%	54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	74.1 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	13.5%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-24.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	8.4%	193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	6.3 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	7.8%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-10.8 pp vs world	0.6%	57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	16.2%	201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-21.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	10.5%	183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.2 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world	8.3%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-11.1 pp vs world	2.2%	48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	77.1 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	18.8%	198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-20.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	10.2%	186 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	9.8 / 100	-8.6 pp vs world	9.0%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world	1.2%	58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	19.2%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-18.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	9.3%	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	9.1%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-9.9 pp vs world	0.1%	75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	18.4%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-20.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	7.5%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-13.1 pp vs world	9.5%	201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-10.7 pp vs world	-1.9%	84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.5 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	17.0%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-23.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	6.7%	201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-14.4 pp vs world	8.9%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-11.8 pp vs world	-2.2%	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	15.6%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-26.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	7.0%	201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-15.0 pp vs world	9.6%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-11.9 pp vs world	-2.6%	90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	16.6%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-26.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	7.0%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-14.8 pp vs world	9.4%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-12.0 pp vs world	-2.4%	73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.9 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	16.4%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-26.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	9.6%	194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100	-12.3 pp vs world	11.4%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	-1.9%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	21.0%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-22.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	10.2%	194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100	-13.4 pp vs world	12.5%	201 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-11.0 pp vs world	-2.3%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	22.6%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-24.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	12.4%	190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	7.8 / 100	-10.6 pp vs world	14.6%	198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	-2.2%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	26.9%	198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-19.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	14.2%	188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	8.8 / 100	-9.0 pp vs world	13.4%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-9.6 pp vs world	0.8%	75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.9 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	27.6%	198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-18.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	15.2%	182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.7 / 100	-8.8 pp vs world	13.0%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-10.8 pp vs world	2.2%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	28.1%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-19.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	16.5%	177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	14.1 / 100	-9.2 pp vs world	13.1%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-12.3 pp vs world	3.4%	57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	29.7%	200 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-21.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	15.2%	186 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	10.6 / 100	-11.8 pp vs world	11.8%	207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-14.8 pp vs world	3.4%	59 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.0 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	27.1%	204 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	1.9 / 100	-26.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	14.4%	186 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	10.6 / 100	-14.3 pp vs world	11.7%	207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-16.4 pp vs world	2.7%	69 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.1 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	26.0%	205 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-30.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	13.3%	192 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	7.7 / 100	-16.3 pp vs world	12.0%	207 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-16.9 pp vs world	1.4%	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	25.3%	206 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-33.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	13.5%	192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	8.6 / 100	-17.4 pp vs world	13.7%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-16.5 pp vs world	-0.2%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	27.3%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-33.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	10.9%	196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	6.7 / 100	-15.4 pp vs world	11.3%	209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-14.4 pp vs world	-0.4%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	22.1%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-29.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	10.9%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-17.7 pp vs world	11.9%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-15.8 pp vs world	-1.0%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	22.8%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-33.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	11.6%	201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.3 / 100	-18.8 pp vs world	12.4%	209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-17.1 pp vs world	-0.8%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	23.9%	209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-35.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	11.9%	198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.7 / 100	-18.3 pp vs world	13.2%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-15.9 pp vs world	-1.4%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	25.1%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-34.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	11.7%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-18.4 pp vs world	14.0%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-15.1 pp vs world	-2.3%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	25.8%	209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-33.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	11.0%	201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.3 / 100	-18.7 pp vs world	13.7%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-15.3 pp vs world	-2.7%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	24.7%	208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-34.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	12.9%	195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	7.2 / 100	-15.2 pp vs world	14.1%	206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.9 / 100	-13.5 pp vs world	-1.2%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	27.0%	205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-28.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	12.5%	195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	7.2 / 100	-14.7 pp vs world	12.1%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-14.3 pp vs world	0.4%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	24.5%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-29.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	12.5%	196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	6.7 / 100	-15.6 pp vs world	11.8%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-15.5 pp vs world	0.7%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	24.3%	207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.4 / 100	-31.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	14.6%	185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.0 / 100	-14.4 pp vs world	14.2%	206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.9 / 100	-14.0 pp vs world	0.4%	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	28.9%	204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	2.9 / 100	-28.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	14.1%	189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	10.0 / 100	-14.0 pp vs world	14.8%	206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	1.9 / 100	-12.7 pp vs world	-0.6%	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	28.9%	205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	2.4 / 100	-26.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	16.5%	170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-9.6 pp vs world	15.8%	201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.3 / 100	-9.5 pp vs world	0.6%	76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	32.3%	196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	6.7 / 100	-19.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	19.1%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-9.5 pp vs world	18.5%	198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.7 / 100	-9.1 pp vs world	0.6%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	37.7%	194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	7.7 / 100	-18.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	19.6%	171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	18.7 / 100	-11.3 pp vs world	19.2%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	0.4%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	38.8%	194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	7.7 / 100	-22.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	18.0%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-11.1 pp vs world	15.7%	202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	3.8 / 100	-12.6 pp vs world	2.3%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	33.7%	199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.3 / 100	-23.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	17.9%	178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-11.0 pp vs world	17.6%	198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	5.7 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world	0.3%	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	35.6%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-21.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

South America40.5%2024

World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 49.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing6.7%

1970–1990-1.0 pp1990–2010-5.3 pp2010–2024+1.9 pp

World specialization: 1.57×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities20.8%

1970–1990+1.3 pp1990–2010-8.8 pp2010–2024-0.3 pp

World specialization: 0.99×

Construction3.6%

1970–1990+2.3 pp1990–2010-0.8 pp2010–2024-2.7 pp

World specialization: 0.62×

Trade, restaurants and hotels12.1%

1970–1990-8.8 pp1990–2010+5.5 pp2010–2024-0.5 pp

World specialization: 0.84×

Transport, storage and communication7.1%

1970–1990+0.1 pp1990–2010+3.2 pp2010–2024-1.0 pp

World specialization: 0.73×

Other activities49.7%

1970–1990+7.6 pp1990–2010+6.1 pp2010–2024+2.6 pp

World specialization: 1.12×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added

Formation1970–1990

33.3% → 40.9%

Percentage-point change: +7.6 pp

Integration1990–2010

40.9% → 47.1%

Percentage-point change: +6.1 pp

Current era2010–2024

47.1% → 49.7%

Percentage-point change: +2.6 pp

How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing1.57×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities0.99×

Construction0.62×

Trade, restaurants and hotels0.84×

Transport, storage and communication0.73×

Other activities1.12×

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table

Brazil	1970	11.1%	111 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	37.1 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	28.6%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	4.8%	108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	15.9%	78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	56.3 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	4.8%	130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.7 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	33.3%	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	12.2%	106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	40.0 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	31.7%	36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.2 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	6.1%	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	15.9%	79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	3.7%	150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	30.5%	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	11.9%	106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	40.0 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	31.4%	39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	78.5 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	5.9%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	15.3%	87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.1 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	4.2%	142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.9 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	31.4%	64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	12.1%	102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	33.3%	37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	5.7%	89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	15.5%	83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	4.0%	146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	28.7%	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	11.5%	104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	34.5%	36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.2 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	6.0%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	15.1%	81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	4.0%	145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	29.0%	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	10.8%	107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	34.0%	33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	6.1%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	14.6%	88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	50.6 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	4.1%	140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	30.4%	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	10.9%	106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	40.0 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	33.8%	34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	81.4 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	6.3%	89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	13.4%	104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	4.5%	138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.2 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	31.2%	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	12.6%	102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	32.4%	39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	78.5 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	6.2%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	12.7%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	4.6%	136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.3 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	31.5%	69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.6 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	10.3%	104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	33.2%	32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	82.5 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	6.4%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	12.1%	124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	4.9%	132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	33.2%	67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	9.9%	106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	40.0 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	33.1%	35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.8 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	6.9%	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	11.3%	132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	5.1%	125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	33.7%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	10.1%	105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	40.6 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	34.1%	33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	6.8%	76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	10.9%	133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	4.7%	133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	33.4%	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	10.1%	103 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	32.9%	35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.8 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	7.2%	65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	10.3%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	5.1%	127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	34.5%	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	8.7%	113 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	36.0 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	34.2%	29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	7.0%	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	9.9%	143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.3 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	5.4%	124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	34.8%	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	11.6%	96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	45.7 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	34.9%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	7.0%	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	9.3%	152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	14.2 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	4.7%	137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.7 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	34.9%	67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	11.8%	97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	45.1 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	34.7%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	5.6%	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	9.0%	151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	14.8 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	5.6%	122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	32.6%	78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	11.0%	98 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	44.6 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	36.8%	24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	87.0 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	5.4%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	8.5%	158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	10.8 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	5.0%	130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.7 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	33.1%	78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	11.2%	101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	37.0%	18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	6.8%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	8.5%	159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	4.9%	140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	31.7%	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	9.3%	108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	38.9 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	33.7%	23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	7.3%	42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.8 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	7.3%	165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	4.7%	145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	37.7%	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	9.8%	107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	33.0%	27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	7.1%	44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	75.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	7.5%	166 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	6.3 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	5.0%	144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.8 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	37.7%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	7.7%	115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	35.2 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	29.1%	47 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	7.6%	35 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	80.9 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	6.8%	171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.0 / 100	-7.8 pp vs world	4.8%	142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.3 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	44.1%	24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	10.1%	120 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	41.4 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	29.9%	55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	7.1%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	7.1%	182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	11.3 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	4.9%	167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	18.6 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	40.9%	39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	81.5 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	10.4%	118 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	42.4 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	28.4%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	6.7%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	6.6%	191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	6.9 / 100	-8.3 pp vs world	5.0%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	43.0%	36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	82.9 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	6.2%	144 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	29.6 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	23.8%	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	6.7%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	6.8%	189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	7.8 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	5.0%	164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	20.1 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	51.6%	8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	5.6%	149 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	27.1 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	23.6%	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	7.1%	50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	76.1 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	6.1%	198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world	5.1%	166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	52.5%	9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	+10.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	7.9%	126 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	23.3%	97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.2 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	8.9%	22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	89.8 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	6.5%	197 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world	5.6%	157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	23.5 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	47.8%	19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	5.8%	143 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	30.0 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	20.0%	121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	7.0%	46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	78.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	9.1%	181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	11.8 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	5.8%	154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	52.2%	10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	5.5%	142 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	30.5 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	18.1%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	7.4%	42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	80.0 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	8.0%	189 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	7.8 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	6.1%	150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.0 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	54.9%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+12.5 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	5.3%	139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	32.0 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	18.0%	132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	7.7%	35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.4 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	7.9%	188 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	8.3 / 100	-7.2 pp vs world	6.6%	143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	30.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	54.5%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+11.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	5.4%	138 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	17.2%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	7.9%	40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	81.0 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	7.5%	195 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	4.9 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	7.1%	140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	31.9 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	54.8%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	5.4%	135 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	18.0%	126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	7.1%	44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	7.6%	190 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	7.4 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	6.7%	147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	55.2%	7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+11.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	5.5%	134 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	19.8%	114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	7.0%	42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	80.0 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	8.1%	186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	9.3 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	8.0%	122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	51.7%	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	5.6%	131 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	36.0 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	20.3%	106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	6.3%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	8.3%	186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	9.3 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	8.2%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	51.2%	12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	6.4%	121 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	19.9%	107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	6.5%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	7.7%	191 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	6.9 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	7.9%	124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.7 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	51.5%	14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	7.2%	115 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	22.3%	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	4.6%	136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	9.5%	182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	11.3 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	7.5%	140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	31.9 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	48.8%	19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	6.7%	116 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	43.3 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	23.7%	82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	4.9%	128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	38.0 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	9.9%	180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	12.3 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	8.0%	130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	36.8 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	46.8%	31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	85.4 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	5.5%	123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	23.9%	80 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	4.6%	140 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	32.9 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	10.8%	170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	18.0 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	8.0%	129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	37.9 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	47.2%	38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	82.1 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	5.1%	124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.7 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	23.3%	86 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	4.3%	151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	27.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	11.2%	167 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	19.4 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	7.8%	138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	48.2%	32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	85.0 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	5.2%	121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	22.6%	90 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	57.0 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	4.6%	153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	26.6 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	11.7%	162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	21.8 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	8.1%	136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	47.9%	29 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	86.5 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	5.4%	118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	43.2 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	23.0%	86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	4.4%	156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.8 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	12.3%	159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	24.0 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	8.3%	118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	46.7%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	5.2%	123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	40.8 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	20.2%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	5.4%	123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	12.7%	153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.9 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	8.1%	136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	48.3%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	4.8%	123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	40.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	21.1%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	6.3%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	12.6%	153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.9 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	8.1%	130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.0 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	47.1%	43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.9 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	5.1%	121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	20.9%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	6.3%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	12.9%	145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.8 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	8.1%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	46.7%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	4.9%	122 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	19.6%	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	6.5%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	13.4%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	8.1%	128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.9 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	47.6%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	5.3%	119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	42.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	18.5%	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	6.4%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	13.5%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	7.9%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	48.5%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	5.0%	121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	17.6%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-5.7 pp vs world	6.2%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	13.6%	137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	8.0%	136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	49.6%	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	5.0%	119 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	42.7 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	16.8%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	5.7%	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	13.3%	144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	7.8%	144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	51.4%	28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.1 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	5.7%	117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	43.7 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	16.2%	126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	5.1%	135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.9 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	12.9%	154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.4 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	7.7%	144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	52.5%	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	5.3%	118 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	43.2 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	16.8%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	4.3%	152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	13.2%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	7.8%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	52.6%	26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.0 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	5.2%	115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	44.7 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	17.8%	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	4.0%	163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	13.0%	145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.8 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	7.8%	140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	33.2 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	52.1%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	4.9%	117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	43.7 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	17.9%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	3.9%	167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	20.6 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	12.9%	150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.7 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	7.9%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	52.5%	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	6.6%	111 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	18.4%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	4.1%	160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	12.5%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	7.7%	130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.3 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	50.6%	41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.9 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	7.7%	101 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	51.5 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	22.3%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	3.6%	173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	17.7 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	12.5%	145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.1 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	7.4%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	46.6%	52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	6.7%	106 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	49.0 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	23.0%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	3.4%	173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	17.7 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	12.8%	141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.0 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	6.5%	153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	47.7%	45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.9 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	6.9%	104 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	21.9%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	3.4%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	12.0%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	6.9%	148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	29.7 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	48.9%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	6.7%	104 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	20.8%	92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	3.6%	170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	12.1%	168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	20.1 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	7.1%	143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.1 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	49.7%	36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 14.1% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Brazil was 1.6 percentage points below the world value.

Latest share: 14.1%
World specialization: 0.90×
Latest year: 2024

Formation1970–1990

27.0% → 25.5%

Percentage-point change: -1.5 pp

Integration1990–2010

25.5% → 15.0%

Percentage-point change: -10.6 pp

Current era2010–2024

15.0% → 14.1%

Percentage-point change: -0.9 pp

Share of total GVA14.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share within parent activity67.7%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real manufacturing growth3.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world manufacturing1.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table

Brazil	1970	27.0%	15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.0 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	94.4%	14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.6 / 100	+10.3 pp vs world	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	1.0%	15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.0 / 100	-99.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1971	28.0%	14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.6 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	88.5%	47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	11.8%	25 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	+8.7 pp vs world	1.1%	12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	-98.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1972	28.8%	15 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.0 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	91.9%	24 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	86.9 / 100	+8.2 pp vs world	14.2%	24 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	86.9 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	1.2%	10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1973	31.0%	10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	93.1%	14 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	92.6 / 100	+10.0 pp vs world	17.0%	13 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	93.1 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	1.6%	8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1974	31.7%	10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	92.0%	30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	83.4 / 100	+12.7 pp vs world	8.5%	49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	72.6 / 100	+7.2 pp vs world	1.9%	8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1975	31.2%	6 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	91.9%	27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	85.1 / 100	+12.8 pp vs world	4.9%	60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	2.1%	8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1976	31.1%	7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	92.1%	26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	85.7 / 100	+13.3 pp vs world	11.7%	40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	77.7 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	2.2%	8 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1977	29.6%	12 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	93.7 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	91.5%	30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	83.4 / 100	+13.0 pp vs world	3.1%	101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	2.2%	7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1978	30.4%	10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	91.5%	31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	82.9 / 100	+12.5 pp vs world	6.4%	77 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	56.6 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	2.2%	7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1979	30.5%	6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	92.0%	21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	88.6 / 100	+14.8 pp vs world	6.8%	75 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	57.7 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	2.2%	7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1980	31.3%	4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	98.3 / 100	+8.4 pp vs world	91.7%	24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	86.9 / 100	+18.1 pp vs world	9.3%	38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	2.1%	7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1981	30.0%	5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.7 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	91.3%	23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	87.5 / 100	+17.9 pp vs world	-8.8%	156 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	2.4%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-97.6 pp vs world
Brazil	1982	30.9%	6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100	+8.8 pp vs world	90.5%	24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	86.9 / 100	+16.4 pp vs world	-0.1%	103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.0 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	2.7%	7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1983	30.2%	6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100	+8.5 pp vs world	86.7%	50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+12.7 pp vs world	-5.9%	155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	12.5 / 100	-7.8 pp vs world	1.9%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1984	29.9%	6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	86.0%	51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world	6.3%	72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	59.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	1.9%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	1985	31.6%	5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.7 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world	85.8%	54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world	8.3%	42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	76.7 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	2.1%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1986	32.1%	5 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.7 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world	86.8%	38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	11.5%	20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	89.2 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	2.1%	7 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1987	28.8%	6 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	85.4%	53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	70.5 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	0.9%	134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	2.0%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1988	28.6%	12 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	86.8%	43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	76.1 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	-2.4%	150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	2.0%	8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	96.0 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1989	25.6%	22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	88.1 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	88.1%	34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	81.4 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world	3.0%	95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	2.6%	7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1990	25.5%	33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	84.3 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	85.4%	62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	-8.0%	159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	10.7 / 100	-9.2 pp vs world	2.2%	8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	1991	23.6%	39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	81.4 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	83.2%	75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	63.7 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	-11.1%	178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	13.2 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world	1.7%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	1992	20.4%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	85.6%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	-17.3%	183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	10.8 / 100	-16.8 pp vs world	1.3%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	1993	20.7%	47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.5 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	87.6%	37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world	0.3%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	1.6%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	1994	20.4%	47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.5 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	87.4%	42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	79.9 / 100	+9.1 pp vs world	15.2%	16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	92.6 / 100	+11.7 pp vs world	2.0%	9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1995	16.8%	83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	84.1%	63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	32.4%	5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	98.0 / 100	+27.5 pp vs world	2.0%	8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1996	14.9%	93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	54.9 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	82.4%	70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	66.2 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	0.1%	148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.9 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	2.0%	8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1997	14.8%	93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	54.9 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	82.4%	68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	2.5%	139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	2.1%	9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.1 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	1998	13.8%	97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.9 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	80.2%	73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	-4.8%	180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	12.3 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	2.0%	8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	1999	14.2%	91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.9 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	78.9%	80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	-1.9%	164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	20.1 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	1.3%	11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2000	15.3%	86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.3 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	77.2%	89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	5.7%	95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	53.9 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	1.5%	11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	95.1 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2001	15.4%	87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	57.8 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	75.6%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	0.7%	136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.8 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	1.4%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2002	14.5%	90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.4 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	72.7%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	2.1%	125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	1.2%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2003	16.9%	68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	75.5%	92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	2.7%	118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	1.4%	12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	94.6 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2004	17.8%	58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	75.1%	93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	9.1%	46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.9 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world	1.4%	13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	94.1 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2005	17.4%	58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	72.7%	100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	2.2%	144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	30.2 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	1.7%	13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.2 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2006	16.6%	65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	71.1%	102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	1.2%	158 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	23.8 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	1.9%	13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.2 / 100	-98.1 pp vs world
Brazil	2007	16.6%	65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	73.6%	95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	6.1%	81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	2.1%	12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	94.7 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2008	16.5%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	72.0%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	4.1%	75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	64.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	2.3%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2009	15.3%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	75.8%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	-9.3%	159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	2.3%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2010	15.0%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	70.9%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	9.2%	59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	2.6%	8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.7 / 100	-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2011	13.9%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	66.3%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	2.2%	132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	2.6%	7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	97.1 / 100	-97.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2012	12.6%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	64.2%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	-2.4%	160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	2.2%	9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	96.2 / 100	-97.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2013	12.3%	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	66.4%	103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	3.0%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	2.1%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-97.9 pp vs world
Brazil	2014	12.0%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	68.2%	103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	-4.7%	182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.4 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world	2.0%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.0 pp vs world
Brazil	2015	12.2%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	72.9%	87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.9 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	-8.5%	192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	8.6 / 100	-12.1 pp vs world	1.5%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.5 pp vs world
Brazil	2016	12.5%	94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.5 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	77.2%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	-4.8%	189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	10.0 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	1.6%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2017	12.4%	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	74.1%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	2.3%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	1.7%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.3 pp vs world
Brazil	2018	12.3%	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	68.9%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world	1.4%	151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.2 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	1.4%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2019	12.0%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	67.1%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	-0.4%	151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.2 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	1.4%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.6 pp vs world
Brazil	2020	12.3%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	66.9%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-10.7 pp vs world	-4.7%	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	1.2%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.8 pp vs world
Brazil	2021	13.9%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	62.4%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-13.0 pp vs world	3.8%	139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	1.3%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.7 pp vs world
Brazil	2022	15.1%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	65.7%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	-0.5%	153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	1.6%	11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.2 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world
Brazil	2023	15.2%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	69.2%	102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	-1.3%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	1.8%	10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	95.7 / 100	-98.2 pp vs world
Brazil	2024	14.1%	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	67.7%	105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	3.9%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	1.6%	13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	94.3 / 100	-98.4 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

South America1.01×

World0.90×

Brazil Economic Overview

Read the economy through three eras

What should a reader know first?

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Real GDP trajectory

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal GDP

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

What does the record show per person?

GDP per person

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Final Consumption

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Trade openness

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Structural change across six activities

Industry composition and economic scale

Broad industry structure over time

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Manufacturing in the economic structure