Source-specific country analysis
Suriname Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | $356.36M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $939 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 101.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | $389.07M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.4% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $993 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 99.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | $424.05M | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | $1,067 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 94.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | $465.16M | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.9% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | $1,175 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 87.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | $561.75M | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -7.1% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | $1,427 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 95.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | $637.65M | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.0% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | $1,630 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 99.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | $692.94M | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.0% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | $1,785 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 102.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | $878.73M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.3% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | $2,282 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 118.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | $1.01B | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $2,641 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 117.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | $1.07B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -5.9% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | $2,840 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 111.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | $1.09B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -8.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | $2,901 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 104.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | $1.22B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.1% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | $3,244 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 115.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | $1.25B | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.2% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | $3,330 | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 122.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | $1.21B | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.9% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | $3,196 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 116.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | $1.18B | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.9% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | $3,098 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 111.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | $1.20B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 14.0% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | $3,092 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 110.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | $1.22B | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.7% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | $3,112 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 98.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | $1.34B | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -7.3% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | $3,382 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 96.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | $1.59B | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.7% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | $3,954 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 102.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | $754.25M | 145 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.5% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $1,847 | 90 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | 46.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | $751.79M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.9% | 165 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | $1,823 | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 42.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | $798.54M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $1,924 | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 43.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | $819.81M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $1,963 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 41.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | $782.99M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -6.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | $1,867 | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 39.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | $826.82M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $1,958 | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 39.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | $844.22M | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | $1,965 | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 36.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | $1.05B | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | $2,400 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 43.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | $1.13B | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.7% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $2,518 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 46.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | $1.35B | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.3% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $2,958 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 56.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | $1.12B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.4% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | $2,393 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 44.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | $1.16B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.1% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | $2,427 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 44.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | $1.02B | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $2,098 | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 39.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | $1.34B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $2,697 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 48.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | $1.56B | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.3% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | $3,076 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 50.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | $1.81B | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | $3,514 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 51.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | $2.19B | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.9% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | $4,223 | 96 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 58.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | $2.63B | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.8% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $5,003 | 97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 64.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | $2.94B | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 117 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $5,530 | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | 63.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | $3.56B | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | $6,633 | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | 70.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | $3.94B | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.9% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | $7,253 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 82.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | $4.48B | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.1% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $8,150 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 85.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | $4.58B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.8% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $8,226 | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 78.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | $5.20B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $9,237 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 87.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | $5.42B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $9,519 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 88.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | $5.56B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | $9,670 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 88.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | $5.13B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.6% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | $8,814 | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | 86.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | $3.32B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.9% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | $5,644 | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 55.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | $3.59B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.6% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | $6,050 | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | 56.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | $4.00B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.9% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $6,666 | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 59.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | $4.25B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.2% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | $7,024 | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 61.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | $4.16B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -16.0% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | $6,792 | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 62.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | $3.36B | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.4% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | $5,433 | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | 43.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | $3.79B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.4% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | $6,084 | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | 47.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | $3.46B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $5,494 | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | 41.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | $4.43B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | $6,990 | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 51.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$356.36M → $751.79M
Compound annual change: +3.8% CAGR$751.79M → $4.48B
Compound annual change: +9.3% CAGR$4.48B → $4.43B
Compound annual change: -0.1% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | $356.36M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.68B | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | $389.07M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.79B | 118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | $424.05M | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.87B | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | $465.16M | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.94B | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | $561.75M | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.80B | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | $637.65M | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.98B | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | $692.94M | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.16B | 118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | $878.73M | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.39B | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | $1.01B | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.52B | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | $1.07B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.37B | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | $1.09B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.17B | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | $1.22B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.32B | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | $1.25B | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.22B | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | $1.21B | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.14B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | $1.18B | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.10B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | $1.20B | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.39B | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | $1.22B | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.35B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | $1.34B | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.17B | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | $1.59B | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.36B | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | $754.25M | 145 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.47B | 130 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | $751.79M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.37B | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | $798.54M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.44B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | $819.81M | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.45B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | $782.99M | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.28B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | $826.82M | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.36B | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | $844.22M | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.36B | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | $1.05B | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.39B | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | $1.13B | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.52B | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | $1.35B | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.58B | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | $1.12B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.54B | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | $1.16B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.60B | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | $1.02B | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.71B | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | $1.34B | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.78B | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | $1.56B | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.96B | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | $1.81B | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.19B | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | $2.19B | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.32B | 161 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | $2.63B | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.51B | 162 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | $2.94B | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.69B | 161 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | $3.56B | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.87B | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | $3.94B | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.03B | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | $4.48B | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.27B | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | $4.58B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.56B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | $5.20B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.72B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | $5.42B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.90B | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | $5.56B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.96B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | $5.13B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.83B | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | $3.32B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.59B | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | $3.59B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.66B | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | $4.00B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.89B | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | $4.25B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.95B | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | $4.16B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.16B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | $3.36B | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.06B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | $3.79B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.16B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | $3.46B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.26B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | $4.43B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.39B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$939 → $1,823
Compound annual change: +3.4% CAGR$1,823 → $8,150
Compound annual change: +7.8% CAGR$8,150 → $6,990
Compound annual change: -1.1% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | $939 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 101.2 (world = 100) | $4,424 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 85.3 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1971 | $993 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 99.1 (world = 100) | $4,558 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 86.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1972 | $1,067 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 94.4 (world = 100) | $4,704 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 85.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1973 | $1,175 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 87.2 (world = 100) | $4,908 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 85.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1974 | $1,427 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 95.2 (world = 100) | $4,583 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 80.1 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1975 | $1,630 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 99.0 (world = 100) | $5,074 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 89.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1976 | $1,785 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 102.1 (world = 100) | $5,574 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 95.2 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1977 | $2,282 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 118.0 (world = 100) | $6,200 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 103.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1978 | $2,641 | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 117.4 (world = 100) | $6,600 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 107.4 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1979 | $2,840 | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | 111.6 (world = 100) | $6,275 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 99.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1980 | $2,901 | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | 104.0 (world = 100) | $5,772 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1981 | $3,244 | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 115.8 (world = 100) | $6,180 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 98.1 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1982 | $3,330 | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 122.0 (world = 100) | $5,903 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 95.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1983 | $3,196 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 116.3 (world = 100) | $5,638 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 89.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1984 | $3,098 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 111.6 (world = 100) | $5,482 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 85.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1985 | $3,092 | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | 110.4 (world = 100) | $6,171 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 94.1 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1986 | $3,112 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 98.1 (world = 100) | $5,982 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 90.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1987 | $3,382 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 96.0 (world = 100) | $5,479 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 81.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1988 | $3,954 | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | 102.2 (world = 100) | $5,875 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 84.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1989 | $1,847 | 90 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | 46.5 (world = 100) | $6,048 | 73 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | 85.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1990 | $1,823 | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 42.0 (world = 100) | $5,753 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 80.4 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1991 | $1,924 | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | 43.0 (world = 100) | $5,875 | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 82.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1992 | $1,963 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 41.6 (world = 100) | $5,861 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 81.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1993 | $1,867 | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 39.4 (world = 100) | $5,445 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 76.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1994 | $1,958 | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | 39.3 (world = 100) | $5,589 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 76.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1995 | $1,965 | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 36.1 (world = 100) | $5,495 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 74.2 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1996 | $2,400 | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | 43.8 (world = 100) | $5,436 | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 71.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1997 | $2,518 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 46.8 (world = 100) | $5,629 | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | 72.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1998 | $2,958 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 56.1 (world = 100) | $5,643 | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | 71.8 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 1999 | $2,393 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | 44.3 (world = 100) | $5,450 | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 67.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2000 | $2,427 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 44.2 (world = 100) | $5,449 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 65.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2001 | $2,098 | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 39.0 (world = 100) | $5,562 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 66.7 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2002 | $2,697 | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 48.8 (world = 100) | $5,601 | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 66.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2003 | $3,076 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 50.2 (world = 100) | $5,837 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 68.3 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2004 | $3,514 | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 51.6 (world = 100) | $6,212 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | 70.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2005 | $4,223 | 96 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 58.0 (world = 100) | $6,389 | 94 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | 70.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2006 | $5,003 | 97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 64.2 (world = 100) | $6,684 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 71.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2007 | $5,530 | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | 63.7 (world = 100) | $6,945 | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | 72.3 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2008 | $6,633 | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | 70.4 (world = 100) | $7,211 | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | 74.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2009 | $7,253 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 82.2 (world = 100) | $7,405 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 78.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2010 | $8,150 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 85.4 (world = 100) | $7,763 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 79.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2011 | $8,226 | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 78.5 (world = 100) | $8,193 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 82.7 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2012 | $9,237 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 87.4 (world = 100) | $8,390 | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | 83.5 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2013 | $9,519 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 88.5 (world = 100) | $8,613 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 84.4 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2014 | $9,670 | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 88.7 (world = 100) | $8,612 | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 82.9 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2015 | $8,814 | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | 86.5 (world = 100) | $8,300 | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 78.4 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2016 | $5,644 | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | 55.2 (world = 100) | $7,810 | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | 72.6 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2017 | $6,050 | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | 56.2 (world = 100) | $7,852 | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | 71.4 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2018 | $6,666 | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | 59.0 (world = 100) | $8,161 | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | 72.7 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2019 | $7,024 | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | 61.9 (world = 100) | $8,171 | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | 71.7 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2020 | $6,792 | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 62.0 (world = 100) | $6,792 | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | 62.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2021 | $5,433 | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | 43.8 (world = 100) | $6,567 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 56.8 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2022 | $6,084 | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | 47.5 (world = 100) | $6,668 | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | 56.3 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2023 | $5,494 | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | 41.5 (world = 100) | $6,775 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 56.0 (world = 100) |
| Suriname | 2024 | $6,990 | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | 51.1 (world = 100) | $6,916 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | 56.1 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
6.4% → -3.9%
Average annual rate: +2.0%-3.9% → 6.1%
Average annual rate: +2.7%6.1% → 3.0%
Average annual rate: +0.7%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1971 | 6.4% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 3.0% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1972 | 4.6% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 3.2% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1973 | 3.9% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 4.4% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 0.0 | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1974 | -7.1% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | -6.6% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 0.0 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1975 | 10.0% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 10.7% | 9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 95.5 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 0.0 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1976 | 9.0% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 9.8% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1977 | 10.3% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 11.2% | 9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 95.5 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1978 | 5.5% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 6.4% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1979 | -5.9% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | -4.9% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 164 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1980 | -8.6% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | -8.0% | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1981 | 7.1% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 7.1% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1982 | -4.2% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -4.5% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1983 | -3.9% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | -4.5% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1984 | -1.9% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | -2.8% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 0.0 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1985 | 14.0% | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 12.6% | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 0.0 | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1986 | -1.7% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | -3.1% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 0.0 | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1987 | -7.3% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | -8.4% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 0.0 | 170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1988 | 8.7% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 7.2% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.0 | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1989 | 4.5% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 2.9% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 173 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1990 | -3.9% | 165 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 7.9 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | -4.9% | 161 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1991 | 2.7% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 2.1% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.0 | 188 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1992 | 0.4% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0 | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1993 | -6.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | -7.1% | 184 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 0.1 | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1994 | 3.4% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 0.5 | 196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1995 | 0.0% | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | -1.7% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 1.7 | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1996 | 1.0% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | -1.1% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 1.9 | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1997 | 5.7% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 3.6% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 1.9 | 198 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1998 | 2.3% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 2.3 | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 |
| Suriname | 1999 | -1.4% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | -3.4% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 3.9 | 196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2000 | 2.1% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -0.0% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 6.3 | 195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.4 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2001 | 4.2% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 2.1% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 8.8 | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2002 | 2.8% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.1 | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2003 | 6.3% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 4.2% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 14.7 | 194 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2004 | 8.0% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 6.4% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 16.6 | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2005 | 3.9% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 2.8% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 19.4 | 195 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2006 | 5.8% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 4.6% | 82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 22.1 | 195 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2007 | 5.1% | 117 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 3.9% | 105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 23.5 | 195 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2008 | 5.0% | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 27.1 | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2009 | 3.9% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 28.9 | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2010 | 6.1% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 4.8% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 31.0 | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2011 | 6.8% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 5.5% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 35.2 | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2012 | 3.6% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 2.4% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 39.0 | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2013 | 3.8% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 2.6% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 39.2 | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2014 | 1.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | -0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 39.8 | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2015 | -2.6% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | -3.6% | 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 39.0 | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2016 | -4.9% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -5.9% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 48.4 | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2017 | 1.6% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 0.5% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 62.0 | 201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2018 | 4.9% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 3.9% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 65.5 | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2019 | 1.2% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 68.9 | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2020 | -16.0% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | -16.9% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2021 | -2.4% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | -3.3% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 162.1 | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2022 | 2.4% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 1.5% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 242.2 | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2023 | 2.5% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 320.3 | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 |
| Suriname | 2024 | 3.0% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 2.1% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 360.3 | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
76.8% → 82.5%
Percentage-point change: +5.6 pp82.5% → 54.1%
Percentage-point change: -28.3 pp54.1% → 65.3%
Percentage-point change: +11.2 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | 76.8% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 53.4% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 23.4% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 95.2% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | 74.8% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 51.6% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 23.2% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 92.4% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | 73.0% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 51.1% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 22.0% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 94.8% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | 73.9% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 56.8% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 96.9% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | 69.1% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 52.9% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 16.2% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 99.0% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | 73.8% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 52.8% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 20.9% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 106.1% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | 61.7% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 36.4% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -19.7 pp vs world | 25.3% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 100.2% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | 69.5% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 47.5% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 22.0% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 106.8% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | 69.9% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 47.1% | 160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 22.8% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 102.3% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | 77.5% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 55.6% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 21.9% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 100.3% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | 78.9% | 103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 57.6% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 21.3% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 105.3% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | 82.8% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 58.5% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 24.2% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 114.0% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | 87.7% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 59.2% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 28.4% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 115.4% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | 99.1% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +24.1 pp vs world | 74.4% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 24.7% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 114.7% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | 93.6% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 64.8% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 28.9% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 105.4% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | 88.7% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 55.0% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 33.7% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | 103.2% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | 78.2% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 41.4% | 169 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 36.8% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 100.1% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | 68.6% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 31.0% | 174 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -27.1 pp vs world | 37.6% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 94.6% | 143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | 78.4% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 41.9% | 168 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -15.9 pp vs world | 36.5% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 95.1% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | 69.3% | 143 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 20.2 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 39.3% | 169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -18.4 pp vs world | 30.0% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 90.1% | 158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | 82.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 56.7% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 25.8% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 99.5% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | 84.8% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 54.8% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 30.0% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 103.3% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | 81.0% | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 55.7% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 25.4% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 100.2% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | 59.8% | 197 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 39.4% | 195 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world | 20.4% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 77.8% | 203 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -21.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | 47.6% | 205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -27.8 pp vs world | 34.6% | 198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -24.4 pp vs world | 13.1% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 81.8% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | 45.0% | 206 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -29.9 pp vs world | 20.3% | 205 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 0.0 / 100 | -38.2 pp vs world | 24.8% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 83.8% | 198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -15.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | 80.9% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 64.8% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 16.1% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 112.0% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | 87.5% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 67.7% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 19.9% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 114.9% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | 99.9% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 77.1% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 22.8% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 121.2% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | 41.0% | 204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -34.8 pp vs world | 32.4% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -27.3 pp vs world | 8.6% | 186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 106.3% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | 71.9% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 57.6% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 14.3% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 115.0% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | 74.9% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 59.2% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 15.7% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 123.3% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +23.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | 72.6% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 56.6% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 16.1% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 115.9% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +16.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | 83.4% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 66.7% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 16.7% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 119.1% | 33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.3 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | 72.8% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 58.7% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 14.1% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 116.4% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | 66.0% | 170 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 18.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 53.7% | 156 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.8 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 12.3% | 146 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 29.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 111.6% | 66 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | 52.5% | 188 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -22.0 pp vs world | 39.8% | 182 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 12.1 / 100 | -18.2 pp vs world | 12.7% | 137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 92.7% | 163 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.4 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | 46.9% | 193 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -27.0 pp vs world | 36.8% | 185 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -20.7 pp vs world | 10.1% | 168 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.9 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 93.1% | 162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | 52.7% | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 | -21.2 pp vs world | 41.7% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -15.4 pp vs world | 11.1% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 97.4% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | 53.2% | 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -22.9 pp vs world | 39.6% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -18.5 pp vs world | 13.6% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 104.1% | 108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | 54.1% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -20.4 pp vs world | 40.2% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 14.0% | 129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 91.2% | 172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.8 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | 56.9% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -16.9 pp vs world | 43.6% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 13.3% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 101.9% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | 58.3% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -15.3 pp vs world | 44.3% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 14.1% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 103.4% | 110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.6 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | 60.2% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world | 46.0% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 14.2% | 135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 103.2% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | 62.4% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 48.1% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 14.3% | 136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 107.4% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | 64.3% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 49.6% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 14.7% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 109.3% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | 72.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 60.1% | 124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 11.9% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 106.4% | 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | 63.9% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 52.5% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 11.4% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 98.2% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | 57.0% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world | 46.1% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 10.9% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 96.0% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | 63.5% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 48.6% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 14.9% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 106.7% | 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | 50.8% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -22.4 pp vs world | 40.6% | 195 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | 10.2% | 187 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.6 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 79.3% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -20.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | 57.9% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 45.8% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 12.1% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 85.6% | 187 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.6 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | 61.6% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 48.3% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 13.3% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 88.9% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | 60.9% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 48.2% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 12.7% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 90.4% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | 65.3% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 51.5% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 13.8% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 95.0% | 159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
18.4% → 17.0%
Percentage-point change: -1.4 pp17.0% → 37.1%
Percentage-point change: +20.1 pp37.1% → 29.7%
Percentage-point change: -7.4 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | 18.4% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 18.4% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1971 | 17.7% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 17.7% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1972 | 21.8% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 21.8% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1973 | 23.0% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 23.0% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1974 | 29.9% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 29.9% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1975 | 32.3% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 27.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 5.3% | 22 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | 38.4% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 31.3% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 7.2% | 11 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | 37.3% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 29.4% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 7.9% | 7 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | 32.4% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 26.5% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 5.9% | 13 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | 22.8% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 21.8% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 1.0% | 85 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | 26.5% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 21.5% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 4.9% | 22 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | 31.2% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 27.1% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 4.1% | 23 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | 27.7% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 28.2% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | -0.5% | 110 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | 15.6% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 20.2% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | -4.6% | 140 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 4.1 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | 11.8% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -14.6 pp vs world | 18.2% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | -6.4% | 145 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | 14.4% | 142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 17.9% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | -3.4% | 141 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | 22.0% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 19.1% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 23 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | 26.0% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 16.0% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 10.0% | 2 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 99.3 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | 16.7% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 14.2% | 146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 2.5% | 33 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | 20.8% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 16.6% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 4.3% | 17 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | 17.0% | 156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 15.0% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 2.0% | 54 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | 18.5% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 14.9% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 3.6% | 33 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | 19.2% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 15.3% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 3.9% | 30 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | 18.1% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 12.7% | 184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 5.4% | 14 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | 34.2% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 27.7% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 6.5% | 13 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 92.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | 38.8% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 32.9% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 5.8% | 14 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 92.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | 31.1% | 33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 25.6% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 5.5% | 16 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | 27.4% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 22.0% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 15 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | 21.3% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 21.3% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 1999 | 65.3% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +41.4 pp vs world | 65.3% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +41.8 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2000 | 43.1% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 43.1% | 7 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2001 | 48.3% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +24.8 pp vs world | 48.3% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +25.0 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2002 | 43.3% | 8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +20.3 pp vs world | 43.3% | 8 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2003 | 35.8% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 35.8% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2004 | 43.6% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 43.6% | 6 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 97.5 / 100 | +20.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2005 | 45.6% | 4 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world | 45.6% | 3 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2006 | 40.2% | 8 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 38.0% | 9 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 2.1% | 42 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | 46.2% | 5 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | 42.3% | 7 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 3.9% | 24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | 44.7% | 5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 44.7% | 3 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +20.3 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2009 | 51.0% | 3 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +27.6 pp vs world | 51.0% | 3 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +27.3 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2010 | 37.1% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 37.1% | 13 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2011 | 44.9% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 44.9% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2012 | 45.0% | 9 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 45.0% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +20.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2013 | 43.0% | 11 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 43.0% | 6 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2014 | 45.0% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 45.0% | 5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2015 | 45.0% | 5 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 45.0% | 4 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2016 | 34.4% | 20 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 34.4% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2017 | 34.3% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 34.3% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2018 | 39.0% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 39.0% | 10 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2019 | 43.2% | 8 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 43.2% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +17.3 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2020 | 28.5% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 28.5% | 40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2021 | 27.7% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 27.7% | 44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 79.3 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2022 | 27.3% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 27.3% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2023 | 29.5% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 29.5% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Suriname | 2024 | 29.7% | 43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 29.7% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Suriname is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
109.6% → 44.1%
Percentage-point change: -65.5 pp44.1% → 89.5%
Percentage-point change: +45.4 pp89.5% → 120.5%
Percentage-point change: +31.0 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | 56.7% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +45.4 pp vs world | 52.9% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +41.6 pp vs world | 3.8% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 109.6% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +87.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | 59.1% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +47.6 pp vs world | 56.0% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +44.6 pp vs world | 3.1% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 115.1% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +92.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | 56.7% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +44.9 pp vs world | 51.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +39.6 pp vs world | 5.5% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 107.9% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +84.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | 54.3% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +41.1 pp vs world | 51.4% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +38.4 pp vs world | 2.9% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 105.7% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +79.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | 66.2% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +50.1 pp vs world | 65.4% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +49.3 pp vs world | 0.9% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 131.6% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +99.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | 62.1% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +46.9 pp vs world | 68.1% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +52.9 pp vs world | -6.0% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 130.2% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +99.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | 61.1% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +45.4 pp vs world | 61.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world | -0.2% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 122.4% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +90.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | 55.1% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +39.3 pp vs world | 62.0% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +45.9 pp vs world | -6.9% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 117.1% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +85.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | 55.3% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +39.8 pp vs world | 57.6% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +41.9 pp vs world | -2.3% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 113.0% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +81.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | 58.6% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +41.7 pp vs world | 58.9% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +41.8 pp vs world | -0.3% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 117.5% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +83.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | 68.8% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +50.5 pp vs world | 74.2% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +55.6 pp vs world | -5.3% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 143.0% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +106.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | 56.8% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world | 70.8% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +52.4 pp vs world | -14.0% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | 127.5% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +91.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | 49.7% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +32.7 pp vs world | 65.1% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +47.7 pp vs world | -15.4% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -15.0 pp vs world | 114.7% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +80.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | 43.9% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 58.6% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +41.8 pp vs world | -14.7% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -14.4 pp vs world | 102.5% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +69.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | 43.4% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +26.5 pp vs world | 48.8% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +31.7 pp vs world | -5.4% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 92.1% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +58.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | 36.7% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 39.9% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +23.2 pp vs world | -3.2% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 76.6% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +43.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | 32.6% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 32.7% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +16.7 pp vs world | -0.1% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 65.3% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +33.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | 31.1% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 25.6% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 5.4% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 56.7% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | 29.3% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 24.4% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 4.9% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 53.7% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | 37.7% | 63 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 27.8% | 107 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 9.9% | 19 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 65.5% | 89 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +30.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | 22.4% | 131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 21.7% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 44.1% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | 14.7% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 17.7% | 176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | -3.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 32.4% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | 10.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 11.0% | 196 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | -0.3% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 21.7% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | 101.9% | 5 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +83.1 pp vs world | 79.7% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +61.4 pp vs world | 22.2% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +21.8 pp vs world | 181.6% | 7 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +144.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | 93.3% | 8 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 | +73.8 pp vs world | 78.8% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +59.8 pp vs world | 14.5% | 10 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 95.6 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 172.0% | 9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +133.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | 75.1% | 12 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +54.4 pp vs world | 65.8% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +45.6 pp vs world | 9.3% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 140.8% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +100.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | 56.0% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +34.9 pp vs world | 65.5% | 31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.4 / 100 | +44.8 pp vs world | -9.5% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 121.4% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +79.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | 52.7% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +30.7 pp vs world | 59.8% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +38.3 pp vs world | -7.1% | 126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 112.5% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +69.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | 37.6% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 51.1% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +29.7 pp vs world | -13.5% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 88.7% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | 47.8% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world | 54.1% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +32.5 pp vs world | -6.3% | 123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.5 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 101.9% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +58.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | 49.2% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world | 60.0% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world | -10.8% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 109.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +62.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | 45.2% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world | 62.8% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +39.8 pp vs world | -17.5% | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -17.5 pp vs world | 108.0% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +62.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | 36.4% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 47.9% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +24.9 pp vs world | -11.5% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -11.7 pp vs world | 84.2% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +38.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | 38.5% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 50.9% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world | -12.3% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 89.4% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +41.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | 45.7% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 57.0% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +31.5 pp vs world | -11.3% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 102.7% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +51.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | 51.3% | 64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 59.3% | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +32.6 pp vs world | -7.9% | 121 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 110.6% | 56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +57.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | 52.7% | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | +24.0 pp vs world | 45.4% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 7.3% | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 98.2% | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +41.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | 54.1% | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | 47.3% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | 6.9% | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 101.4% | 68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +42.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | 55.4% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | 53.4% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 2.1% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 108.8% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +47.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | 41.9% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 45.7% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | -3.8% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 87.5% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +35.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | 48.6% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 40.9% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 7.7% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 89.5% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +33.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | 46.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 48.7% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | -2.6% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 94.9% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +35.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | 43.3% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 47.0% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world | -3.8% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 90.3% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +31.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | 43.6% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 47.5% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | -3.8% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 91.1% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +31.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | 42.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 49.8% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | -7.7% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 91.9% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +33.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | 40.8% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 50.1% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | -9.3% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 90.9% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +35.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | 46.0% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 52.4% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +26.0 pp vs world | -6.4% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 98.4% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +44.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | 51.1% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +23.0 pp vs world | 49.3% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 1.8% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 100.4% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +45.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | 58.6% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +29.5 pp vs world | 54.6% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 4.0% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 113.2% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +55.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | 52.6% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | 59.3% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +31.8 pp vs world | -6.7% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 111.9% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +56.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | 84.1% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +58.0 pp vs world | 63.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +38.0 pp vs world | 20.7% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 147.4% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +95.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | 74.0% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +45.3 pp vs world | 60.4% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +32.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 134.3% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +78.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | 68.2% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +37.3 pp vs world | 61.6% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +31.5 pp vs world | 6.6% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 129.8% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +68.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | 73.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +44.5 pp vs world | 64.0% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world | 9.6% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 137.5% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +80.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | 62.7% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +33.8 pp vs world | 57.7% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +29.6 pp vs world | 5.0% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 120.5% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +63.4 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Mining, manufacturing and utilities is the largest current activity at 32.3%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 1.97×
World specialization: 1.53×
World specialization: 1.54×
World specialization: 1.58×
World specialization: 0.53×
World specialization: 0.50×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
33.5% → 16.6%
Percentage-point change: -16.9 pp16.6% → 33.9%
Percentage-point change: +17.3 pp33.9% → 32.3%
Percentage-point change: -1.6 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | 8.0% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 33.5% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 6.2% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 18.3% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 28.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | 8.0% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 33.3% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 6.5% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 18.2% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 6.1% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 28.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | 7.9% | 126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 33.7% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 6.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 18.3% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 28.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | 8.0% | 126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 33.5% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 6.0% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 18.2% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 28.1% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | 8.0% | 123 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 32.7% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 7.4% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 18.1% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 5.9% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 27.9% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | 7.7% | 121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 34.8% | 31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 4.4% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 18.7% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 6.3% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 28.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | 8.3% | 120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 33.2% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 6.2% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 17.9% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 6.1% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 28.3% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | 8.1% | 120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 30.1% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 11.3% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 17.8% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 27.3% | 99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | 7.2% | 124 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 30.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 8.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 19.3% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 6.5% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 28.7% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | 8.3% | 117 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 30.6% | 44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 7.4% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 19.4% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 5.6% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 28.8% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | 8.7% | 114 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 30.6% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 6.3% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 19.3% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 5.1% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 30.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | 8.7% | 111 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 29.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 6.7% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 17.9% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 4.9% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 32.6% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | 8.6% | 114 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 25.5% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 6.6% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 18.8% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 4.9% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 35.7% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | 7.9% | 115 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 23.8% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 6.2% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 19.2% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 37.7% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | 8.5% | 110 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 23.8% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 6.7% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 17.1% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 38.0% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | 8.6% | 108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 22.6% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 5.9% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 16.2% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 6.9% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 39.8% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | 9.5% | 107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 20.4% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 6.1% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 16.4% | 77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.8 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 6.6% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 41.1% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | 10.4% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 17.3% | 118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 6.0% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 15.9% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 7.1% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 43.2% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | 10.1% | 102 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 20.4% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 5.6% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 16.3% | 73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 6.9% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 40.7% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | 9.0% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 18.7% | 112 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 6.6% | 56 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 19.1% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 6.2% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 40.4% | 41 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | 17.3% | 83 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 16.6% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 6.8% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 27.4% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 5.0% | 165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 26.9% | 126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | 18.1% | 77 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 62.6 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 12.4% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -13.6 pp vs world | 6.8% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 29.8% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 5.6% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 27.2% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -13.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | 21.9% | 58 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 71.9 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 10.6% | 165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 7.5% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 31.5% | 12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 5.5% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 23.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | 33.6% | 31 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +29.4 pp vs world | 10.3% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -14.4 pp vs world | 4.9% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 27.8% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 9.8% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 13.6% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -28.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | 32.7% | 29 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 86.2 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | 20.1% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 4.4% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 22.3% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 9.7% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 10.8% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -30.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | 29.9% | 36 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world | 23.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 3.8% | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 25.0% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 11.0% | 199 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -31.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | 31.9% | 32 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world | 19.9% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 20.9% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 7.4% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 15.4% | 187 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 9.3 / 100 | -27.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | 25.3% | 48 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 20.6% | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 3.8% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 23.3% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 7.1% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 19.9% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -22.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | 19.4% | 63 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 16.5% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 5.7% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 25.2% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 5.6% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 27.7% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -15.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | 19.2% | 62 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 18.1% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 4.7% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 27.2% | 14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.6 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 6.7% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 24.1% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | 20.6% | 56 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 23.2% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 3.8% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 21.1% | 31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 7.8% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 23.6% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -20.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | 21.2% | 54 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | 23.6% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 18.5% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 8.9% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 23.6% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -20.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | 15.9% | 64 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 69.0 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 27.5% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 3.7% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 16.7% | 68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 9.3% | 96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 26.9% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -18.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | 15.4% | 65 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 68.5 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 25.8% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 3.9% | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 22.1% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 8.9% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 23.8% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -21.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | 12.6% | 78 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 30.9% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 4.5% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 20.4% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 8.8% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 22.8% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -21.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | 11.3% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 32.8% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 4.6% | 139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 21.3% | 26 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 87.9 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 21.7% | 174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -22.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | 11.0% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 34.9% | 36 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 20.5% | 33 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 7.6% | 143 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 20.7% | 176 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.5 / 100 | -23.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | 11.3% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 35.3% | 38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.1 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 5.1% | 131 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 37.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 20.1% | 39 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 81.6 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 6.7% | 162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.8 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 21.5% | 175 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -22.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | 9.9% | 89 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 57.3 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 37.7% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 5.8% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 21.3% | 31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 6.6% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 18.6% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -24.5 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | 11.1% | 76 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 32.9% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 23.6% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 20.6% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -24.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | 10.7% | 80 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 33.9% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 5.3% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 22.7% | 25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 6.4% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 21.1% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -22.8 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | 10.1% | 82 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 34.0% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 6.4% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 22.1% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 6.3% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 21.1% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -22.1 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | 9.7% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 35.2% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 5.6% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 22.0% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 7.2% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 20.2% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -23.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | 10.0% | 84 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 31.1% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 6.5% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 21.8% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 7.7% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 22.9% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -20.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | 10.9% | 78 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 62.6 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 27.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 8.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 21.8% | 35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 10.4% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 21.6% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -21.9 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | 11.3% | 74 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 19.1% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 10.4% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 22.7% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 11.4% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 25.0% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -19.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | 11.4% | 78 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 62.6 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 22.2% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 6.1% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 25.1% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 11.8% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 23.4% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -21.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | 11.2% | 76 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 33.1% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 6.2% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 22.2% | 31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 7.2% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 20.0% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -24.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | 10.3% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 30.5% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 7.1% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 23.1% | 28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 7.1% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 21.9% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -22.3 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | 8.8% | 86 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 26.7% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 7.9% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 24.5% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 6.3% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 25.8% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -18.7 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | 8.4% | 95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 31.4% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 6.4% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 21.6% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 5.8% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 26.2% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -19.4 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | 9.9% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 29.8% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 8.8% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 23.3% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 5.2% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 23.0% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -21.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | 7.5% | 102 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 34.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 8.9% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 22.2% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 4.8% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 22.2% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -21.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | 7.8% | 96 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 32.7% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 9.0% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 23.1% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 5.6% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 21.8% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -22.2 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | 8.4% | 88 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 32.3% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 8.9% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 22.9% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 5.2% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 22.4% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -22.1 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 25.8% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Suriname was 10.1 percentage points above the world value.
- Latest share
- 25.8%
- World specialization
- 1.65×
- Latest year
- 2024
19.9% → 12.5%
Percentage-point change: -7.4 pp12.5% → 23.4%
Percentage-point change: +10.9 pp23.4% → 25.8%
Percentage-point change: +2.3 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Suriname | 1970 | 19.9% | 47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 59.4% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -24.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1971 | 19.8% | 47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 59.5% | 133 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -24.2 pp vs world | 4.1% | 100 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1972 | 19.8% | 51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 59.0% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -24.7 pp vs world | 4.1% | 110 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1973 | 20.1% | 55 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 59.8% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -23.3 pp vs world | 4.9% | 114 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1974 | 19.5% | 56 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 59.7% | 123 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -19.5 pp vs world | 3.2% | 115 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 104 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1975 | 20.0% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 57.4% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -21.7 pp vs world | 4.0% | 65 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1976 | 20.6% | 47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 62.2% | 125 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | -16.6 pp vs world | 7.5% | 77 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1977 | 17.9% | 63 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 59.6% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -18.8 pp vs world | -1.6% | 147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1978 | 17.6% | 65 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 58.5% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world | 6.4% | 78 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 105 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 40.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1979 | 17.2% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 56.2% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -21.0 pp vs world | -5.6% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1980 | 17.6% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 57.5% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -16.1 pp vs world | -10.5% | 169 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 4.5 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1981 | 16.9% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 57.9% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 2.8% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1982 | 13.5% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 52.8% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -21.3 pp vs world | -16.4% | 171 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1983 | 12.1% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 50.9% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -23.1 pp vs world | -9.5% | 163 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.0 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1984 | 12.4% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 52.2% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -22.4 pp vs world | -3.2% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1985 | 12.5% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 55.2% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -20.3 pp vs world | 6.5% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1986 | 12.8% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 62.9% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1987 | 10.7% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -11.1 pp vs world | 61.7% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -17.7 pp vs world | -22.3% | 175 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 1.1 / 100 | -26.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1988 | 11.9% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 58.1% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -22.0 pp vs world | 11.9% | 22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1989 | 11.9% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 63.6% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -16.2 pp vs world | 1.5% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1990 | 12.5% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 75.2% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.9% | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1991 | 10.2% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 81.9% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 2.9% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1992 | 9.2% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 86.4% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | -15.1% | 178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -14.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1993 | 8.7% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 84.7% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | -20.2% | 190 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -19.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1994 | 11.7% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 58.0% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -20.3 pp vs world | 2.8% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1995 | 15.9% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 66.8% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | -1.7% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1996 | 12.3% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 61.8% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 4.8% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1997 | 12.5% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 60.6% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1998 | 11.0% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 66.8% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 2.1% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 1999 | 11.0% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 60.7% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -15.3 pp vs world | -9.0% | 196 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2000 | 18.7% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 80.7% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 60.1% | 3 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +53.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2001 | 18.1% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 76.6% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 12.4% | 30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2002 | 19.6% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 71.3% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | -3.5% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2003 | 18.6% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 72.2% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 5.4% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2004 | 22.2% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 71.7% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 10.8% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2005 | 23.5% | 21 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 71.6% | 104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 10.2% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2006 | 25.1% | 14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 72.0% | 95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 1.8% | 156 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.8 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2007 | 25.6% | 12 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 72.4% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 1.9% | 143 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2008 | 27.5% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 72.9% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 12.2% | 22 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.9 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2009 | 22.6% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 68.9% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | -9.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2010 | 23.4% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 69.1% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 15.1% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2011 | 24.0% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 70.7% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 4.6% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2012 | 24.7% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 70.2% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | -15.9% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -18.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2013 | 22.2% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 71.2% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 11.7% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2014 | 19.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 72.1% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | -5.6% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2015 | 12.5% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 65.2% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2016 | 14.2% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 63.9% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2017 | 24.2% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 73.2% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 21.8% | 5 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +18.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2018 | 21.8% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 71.5% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 5.9% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2019 | 17.8% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 66.6% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | -6.8% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2020 | 23.9% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 76.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2021 | 22.2% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 74.6% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | -19.7% | 204 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -28.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2022 | 28.4% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 82.4% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 1.8% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2023 | 26.8% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 82.0% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Suriname | 2024 | 25.8% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 79.9% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | -4.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization