Tesseron World ObservatoryThe World Quantified
Country contents
NOR · UN M49 578Norway

Source-specific country analysis

Norway Economic Overview

UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)

ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
View source and methodology

Three fixed historical periods

Read the economy through three eras

Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.

Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024

01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$483.59B2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 31 of 210
Real GDP growth2.1%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change
GDP per capita$86,7172024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted
Share of world GDP0.4%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator
Largest broad activity41.1%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities
Manufacturing6.8%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap −8.9 pp
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table
Norway1970$12.81B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.4 (world = 100)Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable$3,30719 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100356.2 (world = 100)0.4%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1971$14.58B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.4 (world = 100)5.7%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+1.5 pp vs world$3,73718 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100373.1 (world = 100)0.4%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1972$17.36B25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 1000.4 (world = 100)5.3%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-0.0 pp vs world$4,41416 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100390.6 (world = 100)0.4%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1973$22.53B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.4 (world = 100)4.5%102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world$5,69015 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100422.0 (world = 100)0.4%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1974$27.15B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.9%107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world$6,81118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100454.4 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1975$32.88B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.0%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+4.1 pp vs world$8,20414 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100498.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1976$35.94B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.8%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+0.6 pp vs world$8,92713 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100510.9 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1977$41.51B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.2%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100+0.0 pp vs world$10,26614 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100531.1 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1978$46.52B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.9%112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$11,46315 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100509.3 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1979$53.13B31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.4%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+0.3 pp vs world$13,04715 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100512.6 (world = 100)0.5%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1980$64.44B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.6%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+2.6 pp vs world$15,77213 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100565.2 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1981$63.60B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.6%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world$15,51312 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100553.8 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1982$62.65B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.2%115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world$15,22510 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100557.9 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1983$61.63B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.0%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world$14,92811 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100543.3 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1984$62.06B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)6.1%45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world$14,99011 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100539.9 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1985$65.42B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.6%47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world$15,75410 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100562.6 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1986$78.69B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.0%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+0.9 pp vs world$18,8848 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100595.6 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1987$94.23B23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.8%126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest29.4 / 100-1.9 pp vs world$22,5069 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100639.0 (world = 100)0.5%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1988$101.90B25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 1000.5 (world = 100)-0.3%155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest13.0 / 100-4.8 pp vs world$24,20711 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100625.6 (world = 100)0.5%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1989$102.63B24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.0%136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest23.7 / 100-2.7 pp vs world$24,28110 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100611.0 (world = 100)0.5%24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1990$119.79B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.9%117 of 179 · highest-to-lowest34.8 / 100-1.1 pp vs world$28,24310 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100651.0 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1991$121.87B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.1%79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world$28,59710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100638.4 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1992$130.84B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.6%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+1.5 pp vs world$30,52510 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100647.0 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1993$120.58B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)2.8%95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world$27,9649 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100590.6 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1994$127.13B29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.1%73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100+1.8 pp vs world$29,31710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100589.1 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1995$152.03B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)4.2%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world$34,87710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100641.2 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1996$163.52B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.0%86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world$37,3249 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100681.5 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1997$161.36B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)5.3%81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world$36,6308 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100681.4 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1998$154.23B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)2.7%139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-0.2 pp vs world$34,8059 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100660.4 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1999$162.38B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)2.1%139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-1.5 pp vs world$36,39410 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100673.6 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2000$171.46B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.3%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world$38,17910 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100695.4 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2001$174.24B25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)2.1%124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100-0.0 pp vs world$38,6039 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100716.6 (world = 100)0.5%25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2002$195.92B24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 1000.6 (world = 100)1.4%149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world$43,1727 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100780.7 (world = 100)0.6%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2003$229.38B23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.9%168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest18.5 / 100-2.1 pp vs world$50,2527 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100820.5 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2004$265.27B23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 1000.6 (world = 100)4.0%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world$57,7717 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100848.7 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2005$309.98B23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 1000.6 (world = 100)2.7%155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world$67,0507 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100920.2 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2006$346.91B23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 1000.7 (world = 100)2.5%171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest17.9 / 100-2.0 pp vs world$74,4377 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100954.6 (world = 100)0.7%23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2007$402.65B24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.9 / 1000.7 (world = 100)2.9%165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest20.8 / 100-1.4 pp vs world$85,5056 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.6 / 100984.6 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.9 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2008$464.92B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)0.5%167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100-1.5 pp vs world$97,5065 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 1001035.6 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2009$387.97B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)-1.9%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world$80,3496 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.6 / 100910.8 (world = 100)0.6%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2010$431.05B25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.8%174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.2 / 100-3.7 pp vs world$88,1655 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100924.1 (world = 100)0.6%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2011$501.36B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)1.1%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world$101,2244 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100965.7 (world = 100)0.7%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2012$512.78B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)2.7%111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100-0.0 pp vs world$102,1784 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100966.6 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2013$526.01B25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 1000.7 (world = 100)1.0%157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.8 pp vs world$103,5444 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100963.2 (world = 100)0.7%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2014$501.74B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)2.0%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world$97,6645 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100896.1 (world = 100)0.6%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2015$388.16B28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.9%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-1.3 pp vs world$74,7937 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100734.4 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2016$370.96B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.2%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-1.6 pp vs world$70,8488 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100692.4 (world = 100)0.5%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2017$401.75B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)2.5%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-1.0 pp vs world$76,1348 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100707.2 (world = 100)0.5%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2018$439.79B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.8%179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-2.4 pp vs world$82,7958 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100732.3 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2019$408.74B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)1.1%163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-1.5 pp vs world$76,4339 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100673.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2020$367.63B32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 1000.4 (world = 100)-1.3%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+1.7 pp vs world$68,3438 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100623.6 (world = 100)0.4%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway2021$503.37B27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)3.9%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-2.5 pp vs world$93,0777 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100749.7 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2022$596.30B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)3.2%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100-0.1 pp vs world$109,2765 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100853.4 (world = 100)0.6%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2023$482.95B32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.1%186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.5 / 100-2.8 pp vs world$87,5048 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100660.2 (world = 100)0.5%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2024$483.59B31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 1000.4 (world = 100)2.1%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-0.7 pp vs world$86,7179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100634.2 (world = 100)0.4%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100-99.6 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Real GDP trajectory. All series equal 100 in the shared starting year.1970–19901990–20102010–2024524.9418.7312.5206.21001970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayEuropeNorthern EuropeWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP trajectory

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Nominal GDP across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024111.6T83.7T55.8T27.9T12.8B1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$12.81B → $119.79B

Compound annual change: +11.8% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$119.79B → $431.05B

Compound annual change: +6.6% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$431.05B → $483.59B

Compound annual change: +0.8% CAGR
Nominal GDP$483.59B2024 · Published series · World rank 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP$402.97B2024 · Published series · World rank 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world GDP0.4%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway1970$12.81B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$94.06B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.4%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1971$14.58B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$99.40B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.4%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1972$17.36B25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$104.69B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.4%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1973$22.53B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$109.44B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.4%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway1974$27.15B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$113.73B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1975$32.88B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$119.37B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1976$35.94B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$126.32B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1977$41.51B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$131.57B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1978$46.52B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$136.67B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1979$53.13B31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$142.64B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1980$64.44B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$149.15B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1981$63.60B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$151.54B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1982$62.65B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$151.89B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1983$61.63B29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$157.93B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1984$62.06B28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$167.49B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1985$65.42B27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$176.79B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1986$78.69B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$183.93B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1987$94.23B23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$187.16B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1988$101.90B25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$186.68B26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest86.4 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1989$102.63B24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$188.62B26 of 179 · highest-to-lowest86.0 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1990$119.79B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$192.26B29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1991$121.87B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$198.19B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1992$130.84B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$205.28B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1993$120.58B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$211.12B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1994$127.13B29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$221.79B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1995$152.03B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$231.01B29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1996$163.52B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$242.62B29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1997$161.36B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$255.44B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1998$154.23B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$262.26B28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest86.8 / 1000.6 (world = 100)0.5%26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway1999$162.38B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$267.70B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2000$171.46B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$276.58B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2001$174.24B25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$282.30B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.5%25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2002$195.92B24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$286.19B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2003$229.38B23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$288.89B27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2004$265.27B23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$300.49B26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.8 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2005$309.98B23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$308.56B28 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2006$346.91B23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$316.15B29 of 208 · highest-to-lowest86.5 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest89.4 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2007$402.65B24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.9 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$325.37B28 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.9 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2008$464.92B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$326.93B28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2009$387.97B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$320.59B28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2010$431.05B25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$323.11B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2011$501.36B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$326.69B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2012$512.78B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$335.56B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2013$526.01B25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 1000.7 (world = 100)$338.97B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.7%25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100-99.3 pp vs world
Norway2014$501.74B26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$345.92B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)0.6%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2015$388.16B28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$352.34B31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2016$370.96B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$356.45B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2017$401.75B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$365.23B30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2018$439.79B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$368.25B33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2019$408.74B29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$372.39B33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2020$367.63B32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$367.63B32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.4%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway2021$503.37B27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$382.00B34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2022$596.30B24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 1000.6 (world = 100)$394.40B35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.6%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100-99.4 pp vs world
Norway2023$482.95B32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 1000.5 (world = 100)$394.69B36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.5%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100-99.5 pp vs world
Norway2024$483.59B31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 1000.4 (world = 100)$402.97B37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 1000.4 (world = 100)0.4%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100-99.6 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

Europe$27.20T2024
Northern Europe$6.28T2024
World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

GDP per person across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–2024109.3K82.2K55.1K28K928.41970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

$3,307 → $28,243

Compound annual change: +11.3% CAGR
Integration1990–2010

$28,243 → $88,165

Compound annual change: +5.9% CAGR
Current era2010–2024

$88,165 → $86,717

Compound annual change: -0.1% CAGR
GDP per person$86,7172024 · Published series · World rank 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP per person$72,2592024 · Published series · World rank 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway1970$3,30719 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100356.2 (world = 100)$24,27121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.7 / 100467.8 (world = 100)
Norway1971$3,73718 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100373.1 (world = 100)$25,46819 of 178 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100480.6 (world = 100)
Norway1972$4,41416 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100390.6 (world = 100)$26,62017 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100486.3 (world = 100)
Norway1973$5,69015 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100422.0 (world = 100)$27,63217 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100483.6 (world = 100)
Norway1974$6,81118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100454.4 (world = 100)$28,53817 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100498.5 (world = 100)
Norway1975$8,20414 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100498.5 (world = 100)$29,78716 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100525.7 (world = 100)
Norway1976$8,92713 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100510.9 (world = 100)$31,37416 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100535.8 (world = 100)
Norway1977$10,26614 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100531.1 (world = 100)$32,54216 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100543.1 (world = 100)
Norway1978$11,46315 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100509.3 (world = 100)$33,67315 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100547.9 (world = 100)
Norway1979$13,04715 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100512.6 (world = 100)$35,02615 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100557.5 (world = 100)
Norway1980$15,77213 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100565.2 (world = 100)$36,50714 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100580.5 (world = 100)
Norway1981$15,51312 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100553.8 (world = 100)$36,96315 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100586.9 (world = 100)
Norway1982$15,22510 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100557.9 (world = 100)$36,91413 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.2 / 100594.3 (world = 100)
Norway1983$14,92811 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100543.3 (world = 100)$38,25512 of 178 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100609.8 (world = 100)
Norway1984$14,99011 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100539.9 (world = 100)$40,45610 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100627.2 (world = 100)
Norway1985$15,75410 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100562.6 (world = 100)$42,5759 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100649.2 (world = 100)
Norway1986$18,8848 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100595.6 (world = 100)$44,1388 of 178 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100664.2 (world = 100)
Norway1987$22,5069 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100639.0 (world = 100)$44,7029 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100661.0 (world = 100)
Norway1988$24,20711 of 178 · highest-to-lowest94.4 / 100625.6 (world = 100)$44,3489 of 178 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100639.0 (world = 100)
Norway1989$24,28110 of 179 · highest-to-lowest94.9 / 100611.0 (world = 100)$44,6239 of 179 · highest-to-lowest95.5 / 100631.1 (world = 100)
Norway1990$28,24310 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100651.0 (world = 100)$45,3309 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100633.4 (world = 100)
Norway1991$28,59710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100638.4 (world = 100)$46,5079 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100652.9 (world = 100)
Norway1992$30,52510 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100647.0 (world = 100)$47,8928 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100669.4 (world = 100)
Norway1993$27,9649 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100590.6 (world = 100)$48,9629 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100683.2 (world = 100)
Norway1994$29,31710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100589.1 (world = 100)$51,1469 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100701.3 (world = 100)
Norway1995$34,87710 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100641.2 (world = 100)$52,9969 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100715.2 (world = 100)
Norway1996$37,3249 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100681.5 (world = 100)$55,3798 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100732.1 (world = 100)
Norway1997$36,6308 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100681.4 (world = 100)$57,9908 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100748.4 (world = 100)
Norway1998$34,8059 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100660.4 (world = 100)$59,1848 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100753.1 (world = 100)
Norway1999$36,39410 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100673.6 (world = 100)$59,9978 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100747.2 (world = 100)
Norway2000$38,17910 of 206 · highest-to-lowest95.6 / 100695.4 (world = 100)$61,5878 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100744.3 (world = 100)
Norway2001$38,6039 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.1 / 100716.6 (world = 100)$62,5438 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100750.4 (world = 100)
Norway2002$43,1727 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100780.7 (world = 100)$63,0648 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100750.1 (world = 100)
Norway2003$50,2527 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100820.5 (world = 100)$63,2888 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100740.3 (world = 100)
Norway2004$57,7717 of 206 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100848.7 (world = 100)$65,4418 of 206 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100742.5 (world = 100)
Norway2005$67,0507 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100920.2 (world = 100)$66,7428 of 208 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100737.7 (world = 100)
Norway2006$74,4377 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100954.6 (world = 100)$67,8378 of 208 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100727.2 (world = 100)
Norway2007$85,5056 of 208 · highest-to-lowest97.6 / 100984.6 (world = 100)$69,0948 of 208 · highest-to-lowest96.6 / 100719.0 (world = 100)
Norway2008$97,5065 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 1001035.6 (world = 100)$68,5678 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100708.5 (world = 100)
Norway2009$80,3496 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.6 / 100910.8 (world = 100)$66,3948 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100704.8 (world = 100)
Norway2010$88,1655 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100924.1 (world = 100)$66,0889 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100680.4 (world = 100)
Norway2011$101,2244 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100965.7 (world = 100)$65,9578 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100665.8 (world = 100)
Norway2012$102,1784 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100966.6 (world = 100)$66,8668 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100665.3 (world = 100)
Norway2013$103,5444 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.6 / 100963.2 (world = 100)$66,7268 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100653.9 (world = 100)
Norway2014$97,6645 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100896.1 (world = 100)$67,3338 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100648.1 (world = 100)
Norway2015$74,7937 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100734.4 (world = 100)$67,8929 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100641.2 (world = 100)
Norway2016$70,8488 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100692.4 (world = 100)$68,0769 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100633.1 (world = 100)
Norway2017$76,1348 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100707.2 (world = 100)$69,2149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100629.6 (world = 100)
Norway2018$82,7958 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100732.3 (world = 100)$69,3289 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100617.5 (world = 100)
Norway2019$76,4339 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100673.5 (world = 100)$69,6369 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100610.7 (world = 100)
Norway2020$68,3438 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100623.6 (world = 100)$68,3438 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100623.6 (world = 100)
Norway2021$93,0777 of 210 · highest-to-lowest97.1 / 100749.7 (world = 100)$70,6358 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100610.8 (world = 100)
Norway2022$109,2765 of 210 · highest-to-lowest98.1 / 100853.4 (world = 100)$72,2778 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100609.9 (world = 100)
Norway2023$87,5048 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100660.2 (world = 100)$71,5128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.7 / 100591.5 (world = 100)
Norway2024$86,7179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100634.2 (world = 100)$72,2599 of 210 · highest-to-lowest96.2 / 100586.3 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

Europe$36,4082024
Northern Europe$57,7922024
World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Real GDP growth across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202484.51-2.5-61971198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldConstant prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

5.7% → 1.9%

Average annual rate: +3.7%
Integration1990–2010

1.9% → 0.8%

Average annual rate: +2.6%
Current era2010–2024

0.8% → 2.1%

Average annual rate: +1.5%
Real GDP growth2.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real GDP-per-person growth1.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Implicit GDP deflator137.02024 · Published series · World rank 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway1970Source observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailableSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable10.348 of 178 · highest-to-lowest73.4 / 100
Norway19715.7%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+1.5 pp vs world4.9%45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+2.8 pp vs world11.049 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.9 / 100
Norway19725.3%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100-0.0 pp vs world4.5%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+1.2 pp vs world11.654 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100
Norway19734.5%102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world3.8%83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100-0.6 pp vs world12.654 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100
Norway19743.9%107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world3.3%84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world14.060 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100
Norway19755.0%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+4.1 pp vs world4.4%36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.2 / 100+5.4 pp vs world15.363 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100
Norway19765.8%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+0.6 pp vs world5.3%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+2.0 pp vs world16.564 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100
Norway19774.2%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100+0.0 pp vs world3.7%68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world17.866 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100
Norway19783.9%112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100-0.5 pp vs world3.5%88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.8 / 100+0.9 pp vs world19.066 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100
Norway19794.4%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+0.3 pp vs world4.0%68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.1 / 100+1.8 pp vs world20.072 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100
Norway19804.6%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+2.6 pp vs world4.2%54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+4.1 pp vs world22.773 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100
Norway19811.6%106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest40.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world1.2%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100+1.1 pp vs world25.672 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100
Norway19820.2%115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world-0.1%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+1.2 pp vs world28.372 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100
Norway19834.0%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100+1.1 pp vs world3.6%35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest80.8 / 100+2.6 pp vs world30.272 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100
Norway19846.1%45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world5.8%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+2.9 pp vs world32.174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100
Norway19855.6%47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world5.2%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+3.6 pp vs world33.876 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100
Norway19864.0%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+0.9 pp vs world3.7%49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.9 / 100+2.3 pp vs world33.674 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100
Norway19871.8%126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest29.4 / 100-1.9 pp vs world1.3%95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world36.070 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100
Norway1988-0.3%155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest13.0 / 100-4.8 pp vs world-0.8%140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100-3.4 pp vs world37.871 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100
Norway19891.0%136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest23.7 / 100-2.7 pp vs world0.6%114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100-1.3 pp vs world39.972 of 179 · highest-to-lowest60.1 / 100
Norway19901.9%117 of 179 · highest-to-lowest34.8 / 100-1.1 pp vs world1.6%87 of 179 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100+0.4 pp vs world41.473 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100
Norway19913.1%79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world2.6%57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+3.1 pp vs world42.376 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 100
Norway19923.6%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+1.5 pp vs world3.0%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.5 pp vs world42.179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100
Norway19932.8%95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world2.2%75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100+2.1 pp vs world43.078 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.4 / 100
Norway19945.1%73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100+1.8 pp vs world4.5%53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world43.096 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100
Norway19954.2%97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world3.6%71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+2.0 pp vs world44.399 of 206 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100
Norway19965.0%86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world4.5%60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+2.4 pp vs world46.2101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100
Norway19975.3%81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world4.7%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.3 pp vs world47.5102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100
Norway19982.7%139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-0.2 pp vs world2.1%117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.4 / 100+0.6 pp vs world47.1104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100
Norway19992.1%139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-1.5 pp vs world1.4%123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.5 / 100-0.8 pp vs world50.2101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100
Norway20003.3%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world2.6%118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-0.4 pp vs world57.987 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.0 / 100
Norway20012.1%124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100-0.0 pp vs world1.6%106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world58.985 of 206 · highest-to-lowest59.0 / 100
Norway20021.4%149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world0.8%129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest37.6 / 100-0.0 pp vs world58.092 of 206 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100
Norway20030.9%168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest18.5 / 100-2.1 pp vs world0.4%151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.8 / 100-1.3 pp vs world59.797 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.2 / 100
Norway20044.0%133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world3.4%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+0.3 pp vs world63.295 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100
Norway20052.7%155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world2.0%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world68.793 of 208 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100
Norway20062.5%171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest17.9 / 100-2.0 pp vs world1.6%156 of 208 · highest-to-lowest25.1 / 100-1.5 pp vs world74.776 of 208 · highest-to-lowest63.8 / 100
Norway20072.9%165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest20.8 / 100-1.4 pp vs world1.9%148 of 208 · highest-to-lowest29.0 / 100-1.2 pp vs world77.082 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 100
Norway20080.5%167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100-1.5 pp vs world-0.8%168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.3 / 100-1.5 pp vs world85.256 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100
Norway2009-1.9%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world-3.2%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world80.879 of 210 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100
Norway20100.8%174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.2 / 100-3.7 pp vs world-0.5%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-3.6 pp vs world85.663 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.3 / 100
Norway20111.1%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world-0.2%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-2.2 pp vs world91.342 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100
Norway20122.7%111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100-0.0 pp vs world1.4%110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100-0.1 pp vs world94.432 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100
Norway20131.0%157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-1.8 pp vs world-0.2%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-1.7 pp vs world96.829 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100
Norway20142.0%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-1.0 pp vs world0.9%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-0.9 pp vs world97.129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100
Norway20151.9%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-1.3 pp vs world0.8%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100-1.1 pp vs world94.466 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100
Norway20161.2%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-1.6 pp vs world0.3%156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.8 / 100-1.3 pp vs world92.889 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100
Norway20172.5%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-1.0 pp vs world1.7%129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 100-0.6 pp vs world96.665 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.4 / 100
Norway20180.8%179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-2.4 pp vs world0.2%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-2.0 pp vs world103.129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100
Norway20191.1%163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.5 / 100-1.5 pp vs world0.4%153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-1.1 pp vs world102.626 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100
Norway2020-1.3%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+1.7 pp vs world-1.9%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100+2.0 pp vs world100.01 of 210 · highest-to-lowest100.0 / 100
Norway20213.9%137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.9 / 100-2.5 pp vs world3.4%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100-2.2 pp vs world120.224 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100
Norway20223.2%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100-0.1 pp vs world2.3%129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 100-0.1 pp vs world154.420 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100
Norway20230.1%186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.5 / 100-2.8 pp vs world-1.1%181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-3.1 pp vs world137.341 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100
Norway20242.1%140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.5 / 100-0.7 pp vs world1.0%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world137.052 of 210 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

Europe1.3%2024
Northern Europe1.3%2024
World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Final Consumption across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202483.775.467.158.750.41970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

67.7% → 69.2%

Percentage-point change: +1.4 pp
Integration1990–2010

69.2% → 63.0%

Percentage-point change: -6.2 pp
Current era2010–2024

63.0% → 62.2%

Percentage-point change: -0.7 pp
Final consumption62.2%2024 · Published series · World rank 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Household consumption39.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Government consumption22.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Domestic demand86.4%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway197067.7%147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest17.5 / 100-5.0 pp vs world52.0%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-5.0 pp vs world15.7%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+0.2 pp vs world100.6%111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest37.5 / 100+0.2 pp vs world
Norway197168.4%148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest16.9 / 100-4.6 pp vs world51.9%147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-5.1 pp vs world16.5%77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100+0.6 pp vs world102.5%99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest44.3 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Norway197268.1%150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-4.8 pp vs world51.3%149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-5.5 pp vs world16.8%76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+0.8 pp vs world99.2%125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Norway197367.2%151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-4.5 pp vs world50.3%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-5.7 pp vs world16.9%70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+1.3 pp vs world100.4%113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world
Norway197466.2%148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest16.9 / 100-5.6 pp vs world49.0%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-6.6 pp vs world17.1%63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest64.8 / 100+1.2 pp vs world102.7%100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Norway197568.3%145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest18.6 / 100-5.3 pp vs world50.2%149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-6.4 pp vs world18.1%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+1.2 pp vs world105.8%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100+5.3 pp vs world
Norway197669.5%138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest22.6 / 100-3.4 pp vs world50.6%146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.6 / 100-5.5 pp vs world18.9%59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100+2.2 pp vs world108.4%65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+7.4 pp vs world
Norway197771.0%135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest24.3 / 100-1.9 pp vs world51.9%143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.3 / 100-4.3 pp vs world19.1%58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+2.5 pp vs world109.1%62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.3 / 100+7.9 pp vs world
Norway197869.7%143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100-2.9 pp vs world50.0%154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest13.1 / 100-6.0 pp vs world19.7%53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest70.5 / 100+3.2 pp vs world99.9%128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-1.3 pp vs world
Norway197969.1%142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest20.3 / 100-3.5 pp vs world49.7%149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-6.3 pp vs world19.3%63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest64.8 / 100+2.9 pp vs world97.9%142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-3.0 pp vs world
Norway198065.7%151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-7.5 pp vs world47.0%159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-9.5 pp vs world18.7%67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest62.5 / 100+2.1 pp vs world94.2%154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest13.1 / 100-6.9 pp vs world
Norway198165.0%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-8.4 pp vs world46.4%160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.7 / 100-10.1 pp vs world18.6%68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.9 / 100+1.8 pp vs world93.0%163 of 177 · highest-to-lowest8.0 / 100-7.9 pp vs world
Norway198266.2%163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest8.5 / 100-8.4 pp vs world47.2%161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-10.2 pp vs world19.0%70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world95.1%158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-5.8 pp vs world
Norway198365.8%160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-9.2 pp vs world46.9%161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-11.0 pp vs world19.0%71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.2 / 100+1.9 pp vs world92.4%159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-8.4 pp vs world
Norway198463.7%161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-10.6 pp vs world45.5%160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.7 / 100-12.1 pp vs world18.2%77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100+1.6 pp vs world91.5%160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.7 / 100-9.3 pp vs world
Norway198565.3%158 of 178 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-9.6 pp vs world47.4%160 of 177 · highest-to-lowest9.7 / 100-10.8 pp vs world17.9%79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.7 / 100+1.2 pp vs world93.0%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-7.6 pp vs world
Norway198670.5%144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest19.2 / 100-4.8 pp vs world51.5%145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-6.8 pp vs world19.0%70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+2.1 pp vs world103.6%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100+2.9 pp vs world
Norway198770.7%142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest20.3 / 100-4.4 pp vs world50.7%149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-7.4 pp vs world20.0%59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100+3.1 pp vs world102.4%89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world
Norway198870.2%146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest18.1 / 100-4.2 pp vs world50.3%149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.9 / 100-7.5 pp vs world19.9%55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100+3.4 pp vs world100.8%101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.2 / 100+0.2 pp vs world
Norway198969.1%145 of 179 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-5.0 pp vs world49.1%155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest13.0 / 100-8.6 pp vs world20.0%54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+3.7 pp vs world96.8%133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest25.4 / 100-3.5 pp vs world
Norway199069.2%166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.5 / 100-5.6 pp vs world48.9%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-9.2 pp vs world20.3%66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest68.1 / 100+3.7 pp vs world93.9%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-6.6 pp vs world
Norway199170.1%165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.0 / 100-5.0 pp vs world49.1%174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.2 / 100-9.1 pp vs world21.0%61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+4.1 pp vs world92.4%180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-7.9 pp vs world
Norway199271.9%161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-3.3 pp vs world49.9%179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-8.4 pp vs world22.0%51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+5.1 pp vs world93.5%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-6.4 pp vs world
Norway199371.7%167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest19.0 / 100-3.8 pp vs world49.7%173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-9.1 pp vs world22.0%51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+5.3 pp vs world93.9%174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.2 / 100-5.9 pp vs world
Norway199471.1%165 of 206 · highest-to-lowest20.0 / 100-4.4 pp vs world49.5%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-9.4 pp vs world21.6%55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest73.5 / 100+5.1 pp vs world94.1%166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-5.7 pp vs world
Norway199569.9%169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest18.0 / 100-5.1 pp vs world48.9%180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-9.6 pp vs world21.0%57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.5 / 100+4.6 pp vs world94.1%173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-5.4 pp vs world
Norway199668.4%172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-6.6 pp vs world48.1%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-10.7 pp vs world20.4%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+4.2 pp vs world91.3%183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-8.1 pp vs world
Norway199766.9%180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-8.2 pp vs world46.9%183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-12.2 pp vs world20.0%59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+4.0 pp vs world92.1%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-7.3 pp vs world
Norway199869.9%175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest15.1 / 100-5.7 pp vs world48.5%179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-11.0 pp vs world21.4%48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100+5.3 pp vs world98.1%164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100-1.5 pp vs world
Norway199968.2%177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.1 / 100-7.7 pp vs world47.1%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-12.6 pp vs world21.0%47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+5.0 pp vs world92.7%174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.2 / 100-7.0 pp vs world
Norway200061.3%183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest11.2 / 100-14.3 pp vs world42.4%183 of 205 · highest-to-lowest10.8 / 100-17.2 pp vs world18.9%63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest69.6 / 100+3.0 pp vs world83.1%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-16.8 pp vs world
Norway200162.6%181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest12.2 / 100-13.8 pp vs world42.6%185 of 205 · highest-to-lowest9.8 / 100-17.5 pp vs world20.0%50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest76.0 / 100+3.8 pp vs world83.2%187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest8.8 / 100-16.8 pp vs world
Norway200266.2%171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest17.1 / 100-10.6 pp vs world44.6%182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-15.6 pp vs world21.6%41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+5.0 pp vs world86.6%179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-13.2 pp vs world
Norway200367.5%170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest17.6 / 100-9.2 pp vs world45.6%177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-14.2 pp vs world21.9%41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100+5.1 pp vs world87.0%179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-12.9 pp vs world
Norway200464.9%176 of 206 · highest-to-lowest14.6 / 100-10.9 pp vs world44.2%180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-14.9 pp vs world20.7%43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100+4.0 pp vs world86.5%179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest12.7 / 100-13.3 pp vs world
Norway200561.2%179 of 208 · highest-to-lowest14.0 / 100-14.2 pp vs world41.8%184 of 207 · highest-to-lowest11.2 / 100-16.9 pp vs world19.4%50 of 207 · highest-to-lowest76.2 / 100+2.7 pp vs world83.6%181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest12.6 / 100-16.1 pp vs world
Norway200658.7%179 of 208 · highest-to-lowest14.0 / 100-15.8 pp vs world40.1%181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest12.6 / 100-17.9 pp vs world18.6%55 of 207 · highest-to-lowest73.8 / 100+2.1 pp vs world82.6%181 of 207 · highest-to-lowest12.6 / 100-16.7 pp vs world
Norway200759.0%180 of 208 · highest-to-lowest13.5 / 100-15.0 pp vs world40.3%183 of 207 · highest-to-lowest11.7 / 100-17.2 pp vs world18.6%54 of 207 · highest-to-lowest74.3 / 100+2.2 pp vs world86.0%179 of 207 · highest-to-lowest13.6 / 100-13.2 pp vs world
Norway200856.6%184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.4 / 100-17.4 pp vs world38.2%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-18.9 pp vs world18.4%65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest69.2 / 100+1.6 pp vs world82.3%181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.5 / 100-17.0 pp vs world
Norway200963.5%180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-12.5 pp vs world42.0%186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.1 / 100-16.0 pp vs world21.5%44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.3 / 100+3.5 pp vs world87.8%184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-11.6 pp vs world
Norway201063.0%180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-11.6 pp vs world41.7%184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-15.4 pp vs world21.2%45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest78.8 / 100+3.8 pp vs world87.9%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-11.2 pp vs world
Norway201160.8%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-13.0 pp vs world40.0%184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest12.0 / 100-16.5 pp vs world20.8%43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.8 / 100+3.5 pp vs world86.3%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-12.8 pp vs world
Norway201260.1%183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-13.6 pp vs world39.4%186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.1 / 100-17.1 pp vs world20.6%44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.3 / 100+3.5 pp vs world85.9%179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest14.4 / 100-13.1 pp vs world
Norway201360.9%181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-12.7 pp vs world39.9%186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest11.1 / 100-16.7 pp vs world21.0%40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+4.0 pp vs world88.3%180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-10.8 pp vs world
Norway201462.5%182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest13.4 / 100-11.1 pp vs world40.7%190 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-15.9 pp vs world21.7%38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.2 / 100+4.9 pp vs world89.7%180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest13.9 / 100-9.6 pp vs world
Norway201566.4%178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-7.3 pp vs world43.3%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-13.8 pp vs world23.1%35 of 209 · highest-to-lowest83.7 / 100+6.5 pp vs world93.3%173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest17.3 / 100-6.2 pp vs world
Norway201669.5%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100-4.3 pp vs world45.3%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-12.0 pp vs world24.2%29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest86.5 / 100+7.6 pp vs world97.2%158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest24.5 / 100-2.0 pp vs world
Norway201768.1%172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-5.2 pp vs world44.3%187 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.6 / 100-12.6 pp vs world23.8%31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+7.4 pp vs world95.6%163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest22.1 / 100-3.6 pp vs world
Norway201865.8%174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.2 / 100-7.0 pp vs world42.7%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-13.6 pp vs world23.1%31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+6.7 pp vs world93.6%171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest18.3 / 100-5.6 pp vs world
Norway201968.0%167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-5.0 pp vs world43.9%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-12.5 pp vs world24.1%28 of 209 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+7.5 pp vs world97.6%149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest28.8 / 100-1.8 pp vs world
Norway202069.6%176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-3.6 pp vs world43.4%190 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-12.0 pp vs world26.1%25 of 209 · highest-to-lowest88.5 / 100+8.4 pp vs world100.9%123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Norway202160.1%191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-11.9 pp vs world37.6%195 of 209 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-17.3 pp vs world22.4%43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest79.8 / 100+5.5 pp vs world85.2%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-13.8 pp vs world
Norway202250.4%201 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.3 / 100-21.5 pp vs world32.4%203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest2.9 / 100-23.2 pp vs world18.0%85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world71.6%198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-27.6 pp vs world
Norway202360.3%193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.1 / 100-12.7 pp vs world38.4%194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-18.0 pp vs world21.9%38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest82.2 / 100+5.4 pp vs world84.5%191 of 209 · highest-to-lowest8.7 / 100-14.7 pp vs world
Norway202462.2%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-11.0 pp vs world39.5%194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-17.2 pp vs world22.8%39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest81.7 / 100+6.2 pp vs world86.4%189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-12.8 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

Europe74.5%2024
Northern Europe74.0%2024
World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Gross Capital Formation across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202438.933.728.523.318.11970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

32.9% → 24.8%

Percentage-point change: -8.1 pp
Integration1990–2010

24.8% → 25.0%

Percentage-point change: +0.2 pp
Current era2010–2024

25.0% → 24.1%

Percentage-point change: -0.9 pp
Gross capital formation24.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Gross fixed capital formation22.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest
Changes in inventories2.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 34 of 163 · highest-to-lowest
Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway197032.9%31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.0 / 100+5.1 pp vs world28.0%40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest77.8 / 100+5.1 pp vs world4.9%23 of 137 · highest-to-lowest83.8 / 100+0.1 pp vs world
Norway197134.1%28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+6.7 pp vs world30.6%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+7.4 pp vs world3.6%29 of 137 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Norway197231.2%38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.0 / 100+3.8 pp vs world28.9%44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.4 pp vs world2.3%39 of 138 · highest-to-lowest72.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Norway197333.2%29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+4.6 pp vs world30.1%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+2.9 pp vs world3.1%34 of 140 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+1.8 pp vs world
Norway197436.5%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+8.0 pp vs world31.8%28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest84.7 / 100+5.3 pp vs world4.7%33 of 138 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world
Norway197537.4%21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.6 / 100+10.6 pp vs world34.8%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+8.4 pp vs world2.7%47 of 140 · highest-to-lowest66.9 / 100+2.2 pp vs world
Norway197638.9%18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.3 / 100+10.8 pp vs world37.1%17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+10.2 pp vs world1.8%56 of 139 · highest-to-lowest60.1 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Norway197738.1%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+9.8 pp vs world37.2%19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+10.0 pp vs world0.9%79 of 139 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Norway197830.2%48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.3 / 100+1.7 pp vs world31.8%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+4.2 pp vs world-1.6%126 of 139 · highest-to-lowest9.4 / 100-2.6 pp vs world
Norway197928.8%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+0.5 pp vs world30.5%37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.5 / 100+3.3 pp vs world-1.7%126 of 142 · highest-to-lowest11.3 / 100-2.7 pp vs world
Norway198028.5%61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100+0.6 pp vs world27.9%56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world0.6%95 of 143 · highest-to-lowest33.8 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Norway198128.0%63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest64.8 / 100+0.5 pp vs world28.2%52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest71.0 / 100+1.4 pp vs world-0.2%110 of 144 · highest-to-lowest23.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Norway198228.9%53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest70.5 / 100+2.6 pp vs world28.3%53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest70.5 / 100+2.2 pp vs world0.6%79 of 145 · highest-to-lowest45.8 / 100+0.5 pp vs world
Norway198326.6%56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest68.8 / 100+0.7 pp vs world28.9%47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest73.9 / 100+3.3 pp vs world-2.3%130 of 146 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-2.5 pp vs world
Norway198427.7%50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100+1.3 pp vs world27.5%44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100+2.2 pp vs world0.2%104 of 147 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Norway198527.7%45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world26.0%49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest72.7 / 100+1.1 pp vs world1.7%48 of 148 · highest-to-lowest68.0 / 100+0.9 pp vs world
Norway198633.1%23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest87.5 / 100+7.7 pp vs world28.8%37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest79.5 / 100+3.9 pp vs world4.3%14 of 148 · highest-to-lowest91.2 / 100+3.8 pp vs world
Norway198731.7%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+6.2 pp vs world29.1%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100+4.2 pp vs world2.6%31 of 151 · highest-to-lowest80.0 / 100+2.0 pp vs world
Norway198830.6%31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.0 / 100+4.3 pp vs world29.7%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100+4.3 pp vs world1.0%67 of 151 · highest-to-lowest56.0 / 100+0.1 pp vs world
Norway198927.6%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100+1.4 pp vs world26.9%44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest75.7 / 100+1.8 pp vs world0.8%81 of 152 · highest-to-lowest47.0 / 100-0.3 pp vs world
Norway199024.8%87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100-1.0 pp vs world22.8%96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.4 / 100-2.2 pp vs world1.9%57 of 174 · highest-to-lowest67.6 / 100+1.2 pp vs world
Norway199122.3%102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100-2.9 pp vs world21.8%100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.5 / 100-2.5 pp vs world0.6%99 of 172 · highest-to-lowest42.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world
Norway199221.6%104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100-3.0 pp vs world20.9%103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100-3.0 pp vs world0.8%84 of 167 · highest-to-lowest50.0 / 100-0.0 pp vs world
Norway199322.2%89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100-2.0 pp vs world21.3%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-2.4 pp vs world0.8%74 of 170 · highest-to-lowest56.8 / 100+0.3 pp vs world
Norway199423.0%88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100-1.4 pp vs world21.6%100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest51.5 / 100-2.0 pp vs world1.4%71 of 170 · highest-to-lowest58.6 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Norway199524.2%78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest62.3 / 100-0.3 pp vs world21.4%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-2.2 pp vs world2.8%34 of 171 · highest-to-lowest80.6 / 100+1.9 pp vs world
Norway199622.9%97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-1.5 pp vs world21.8%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world1.1%69 of 171 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+0.4 pp vs world
Norway199725.2%75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest63.7 / 100+0.8 pp vs world23.6%80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.3 / 100+0.1 pp vs world1.6%55 of 172 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Norway199828.3%53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest74.5 / 100+4.3 pp vs world26.5%58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.1 / 100+3.1 pp vs world1.7%49 of 168 · highest-to-lowest71.3 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Norway199924.6%80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest61.3 / 100+0.7 pp vs world23.5%82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100-0.0 pp vs world1.1%55 of 168 · highest-to-lowest67.7 / 100+0.7 pp vs world
Norway200021.8%113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.1 / 100-2.5 pp vs world19.8%118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-3.8 pp vs world2.0%41 of 170 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Norway200120.6%133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest35.3 / 100-3.0 pp vs world19.5%129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest37.3 / 100-3.8 pp vs world1.0%69 of 172 · highest-to-lowest60.2 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Norway200220.3%133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest35.3 / 100-2.6 pp vs world19.4%135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest34.3 / 100-3.3 pp vs world0.9%69 of 175 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 100+0.6 pp vs world
Norway200319.4%142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100-3.7 pp vs world18.9%139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-3.9 pp vs world0.6%91 of 174 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100+0.2 pp vs world
Norway200421.5%120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest41.7 / 100-2.4 pp vs world19.6%134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest34.8 / 100-3.5 pp vs world1.9%54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.1 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Norway200522.4%112 of 207 · highest-to-lowest46.1 / 100-1.8 pp vs world20.3%127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 100-3.3 pp vs world2.1%47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.0 / 100+1.5 pp vs world
Norway200623.9%98 of 207 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100-0.9 pp vs world20.9%135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest35.0 / 100-3.2 pp vs world3.1%25 of 180 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Norway200727.1%73 of 207 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+1.8 pp vs world23.5%107 of 207 · highest-to-lowest48.5 / 100-0.8 pp vs world3.6%28 of 179 · highest-to-lowest84.8 / 100+2.6 pp vs world
Norway200825.8%103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100+0.4 pp vs world22.5%125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest40.4 / 100-1.9 pp vs world3.3%39 of 180 · highest-to-lowest78.8 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Norway200924.3%83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest60.6 / 100+0.9 pp vs world23.2%95 of 209 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-0.5 pp vs world1.1%52 of 179 · highest-to-lowest71.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world
Norway201025.0%80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+0.4 pp vs world20.7%130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest38.0 / 100-2.9 pp vs world4.3%15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.1 / 100+3.3 pp vs world
Norway201125.4%79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.5 / 100+0.2 pp vs world21.4%115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100-2.7 pp vs world4.1%23 of 179 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+2.9 pp vs world
Norway201225.9%80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest62.0 / 100+0.5 pp vs world22.3%104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest50.5 / 100-2.2 pp vs world3.6%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+2.7 pp vs world
Norway201327.3%62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest70.7 / 100+1.9 pp vs world23.4%93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest55.8 / 100-1.1 pp vs world3.9%19 of 176 · highest-to-lowest89.7 / 100+3.0 pp vs world
Norway201427.2%60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+1.5 pp vs world23.7%85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world3.5%22 of 175 · highest-to-lowest87.9 / 100+2.6 pp vs world
Norway201526.9%61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+1.1 pp vs world23.7%91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest56.7 / 100-1.3 pp vs world3.2%17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world
Norway201627.7%56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest73.6 / 100+2.3 pp vs world25.1%68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest67.8 / 100+0.2 pp vs world2.7%20 of 176 · highest-to-lowest89.1 / 100+2.2 pp vs world
Norway201727.6%60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+1.6 pp vs world24.4%72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest65.9 / 100-0.8 pp vs world3.2%23 of 175 · highest-to-lowest87.4 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Norway201827.7%58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest72.6 / 100+1.4 pp vs world23.8%81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest61.5 / 100-1.8 pp vs world3.9%20 of 175 · highest-to-lowest89.1 / 100+3.2 pp vs world
Norway201929.6%47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest77.9 / 100+3.2 pp vs world26.6%52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest75.5 / 100+0.8 pp vs world3.0%29 of 174 · highest-to-lowest83.8 / 100+2.4 pp vs world
Norway202031.4%34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest84.1 / 100+5.1 pp vs world27.4%50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest76.4 / 100+1.5 pp vs world3.9%17 of 173 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+3.6 pp vs world
Norway202125.1%85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.6 / 100-2.0 pp vs world22.9%98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.4 / 100-3.1 pp vs world2.1%43 of 171 · highest-to-lowest75.3 / 100+1.2 pp vs world
Norway202221.2%141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-6.0 pp vs world18.4%150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest28.4 / 100-7.6 pp vs world2.8%47 of 170 · highest-to-lowest72.8 / 100+1.5 pp vs world
Norway202324.3%89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest57.7 / 100-2.0 pp vs world21.7%115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100-4.1 pp vs world2.6%32 of 169 · highest-to-lowest81.5 / 100+2.1 pp vs world
Norway202424.1%85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.6 / 100-1.8 pp vs world22.0%111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest47.1 / 100-3.4 pp vs world2.1%34 of 163 · highest-to-lowest79.6 / 100+1.6 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

Europe21.8%2024
Northern Europe20.5%2024
World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Norway is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Trade openness across the full available AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202498.279.360.441.422.51970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

71.0% → 71.4%

Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp
Integration1990–2010

71.4% → 68.2%

Percentage-point change: -3.1 pp
Current era2010–2024

68.2% → 81.4%

Percentage-point change: +13.1 pp
Exports47.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Imports33.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Net exports13.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade openness81.4%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices
Norway197035.2%66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100+23.9 pp vs world35.8%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100+24.5 pp vs world-0.6%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-0.6 pp vs world71.0%82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.2 / 100+48.4 pp vs world
Norway197133.6%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+22.1 pp vs world36.1%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+24.7 pp vs world-2.5%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-2.6 pp vs world69.7%83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100+46.9 pp vs world
Norway197233.9%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+22.1 pp vs world33.1%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100+21.5 pp vs world0.8%50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest72.3 / 100+0.6 pp vs world67.0%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100+43.6 pp vs world
Norway197336.3%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100+23.1 pp vs world36.7%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+23.8 pp vs world-0.4%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-0.6 pp vs world73.1%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+46.9 pp vs world
Norway197438.7%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+22.6 pp vs world41.4%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100+25.3 pp vs world-2.7%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100-2.7 pp vs world80.1%75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 100+47.9 pp vs world
Norway197535.2%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100+20.0 pp vs world41.0%75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 100+25.8 pp vs world-5.8%92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.6 / 100-5.8 pp vs world76.3%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100+45.8 pp vs world
Norway197635.2%69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.6 / 100+19.5 pp vs world43.6%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100+27.7 pp vs world-8.4%119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.3 / 100-8.3 pp vs world78.8%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100+47.2 pp vs world
Norway197733.6%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100+17.7 pp vs world42.7%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+26.5 pp vs world-9.1%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-8.8 pp vs world76.2%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100+44.3 pp vs world
Norway197835.4%66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100+19.9 pp vs world35.3%93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest48.0 / 100+19.5 pp vs world0.1%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+0.4 pp vs world70.7%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100+39.5 pp vs world
Norway197938.5%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+21.6 pp vs world36.4%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100+19.2 pp vs world2.1%33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100+2.3 pp vs world74.9%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+40.8 pp vs world
Norway198041.9%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+23.6 pp vs world36.2%91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100+17.5 pp vs world5.8%22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+6.1 pp vs world78.1%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+41.2 pp vs world
Norway198142.1%59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+24.0 pp vs world35.1%97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.8 / 100+16.7 pp vs world7.0%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+7.3 pp vs world77.1%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+40.7 pp vs world
Norway198240.5%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+23.5 pp vs world35.6%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+18.2 pp vs world4.9%17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.0 / 100+5.3 pp vs world76.0%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100+41.7 pp vs world
Norway198340.8%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+24.3 pp vs world33.2%98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest45.2 / 100+16.4 pp vs world7.6%14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+7.9 pp vs world73.9%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100+40.7 pp vs world
Norway198441.6%60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.7 / 100+24.7 pp vs world33.0%99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100+15.9 pp vs world8.5%16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100+8.8 pp vs world74.6%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100+40.6 pp vs world
Norway198541.3%59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+24.8 pp vs world34.3%89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest50.3 / 100+17.6 pp vs world7.0%24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+7.2 pp vs world75.6%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+42.5 pp vs world
Norway198633.0%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100+17.2 pp vs world36.7%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100+20.6 pp vs world-3.6%100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.1 / 100-3.4 pp vs world69.7%78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100+37.8 pp vs world
Norway198731.2%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+14.7 pp vs world33.6%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100+17.0 pp vs world-2.4%91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100-2.3 pp vs world64.9%80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100+31.8 pp vs world
Norway198831.7%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100+14.8 pp vs world32.6%90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.7 / 100+15.4 pp vs world-0.8%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-0.6 pp vs world64.3%87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest51.4 / 100+30.1 pp vs world
Norway198936.4%65 of 179 · highest-to-lowest64.0 / 100+19.0 pp vs world33.2%91 of 179 · highest-to-lowest49.4 / 100+15.4 pp vs world3.2%41 of 179 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100+3.5 pp vs world69.6%81 of 179 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100+34.4 pp vs world
Norway199038.7%73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.9 / 100+19.8 pp vs world32.7%109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.3 / 100+13.5 pp vs world6.1%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+6.3 pp vs world71.4%95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest54.1 / 100+33.3 pp vs world
Norway199138.6%63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.8 / 100+20.0 pp vs world31.0%112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 100+12.4 pp vs world7.6%18 of 206 · highest-to-lowest91.7 / 100+7.6 pp vs world69.6%96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100+32.3 pp vs world
Norway199236.6%74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100+16.8 pp vs world30.1%122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 100+10.7 pp vs world6.5%25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.3 / 100+6.1 pp vs world66.7%103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100+27.5 pp vs world
Norway199336.7%76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 100+17.9 pp vs world30.6%127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest38.5 / 100+12.2 pp vs world6.1%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+5.7 pp vs world67.3%101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100+30.1 pp vs world
Norway199436.7%80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest61.5 / 100+17.3 pp vs world30.9%130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest37.1 / 100+11.9 pp vs world5.9%33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.4 / 100+5.4 pp vs world67.6%108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100+29.2 pp vs world
Norway199536.6%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+16.0 pp vs world30.7%134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest35.1 / 100+10.5 pp vs world5.9%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+5.5 pp vs world67.3%113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest45.4 / 100+26.5 pp vs world
Norway199639.4%78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.4 / 100+18.3 pp vs world30.8%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100+10.1 pp vs world8.7%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+8.2 pp vs world70.2%108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100+28.4 pp vs world
Norway199740.0%76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.4 / 100+18.0 pp vs world32.1%137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest33.7 / 100+10.6 pp vs world7.9%23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.3 / 100+7.4 pp vs world72.2%108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest47.8 / 100+28.7 pp vs world
Norway199836.8%86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+14.9 pp vs world34.9%131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.6 / 100+13.4 pp vs world1.9%39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.5 / 100+1.5 pp vs world71.6%110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.8 / 100+28.4 pp vs world
Norway199938.4%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+16.6 pp vs world31.1%138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest33.2 / 100+9.5 pp vs world7.3%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+7.0 pp vs world69.5%111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100+26.1 pp vs world
Norway200045.6%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+22.1 pp vs world28.7%151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.8 / 100+5.3 pp vs world16.9%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+16.8 pp vs world74.3%111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100+27.3 pp vs world
Norway200145.0%60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+22.0 pp vs world28.2%157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100+5.2 pp vs world16.8%16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest92.7 / 100+16.8 pp vs world73.2%107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100+27.3 pp vs world
Norway200240.5%77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest62.9 / 100+17.3 pp vs world27.0%155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100+4.0 pp vs world13.4%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+13.2 pp vs world67.5%122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest41.0 / 100+21.3 pp vs world
Norway200339.7%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100+15.7 pp vs world26.6%158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest23.4 / 100+2.9 pp vs world13.0%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+12.8 pp vs world66.3%126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest39.0 / 100+18.6 pp vs world
Norway200441.1%83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+15.4 pp vs world27.6%156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.4 / 100+2.1 pp vs world13.5%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+13.2 pp vs world68.7%132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100+17.5 pp vs world
Norway200543.4%84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100+16.4 pp vs world27.0%169 of 208 · highest-to-lowest18.8 / 100+0.4 pp vs world16.4%27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.4 / 100+16.0 pp vs world70.5%127 of 208 · highest-to-lowest39.1 / 100+16.8 pp vs world
Norway200644.5%82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest60.9 / 100+15.8 pp vs world27.1%172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest17.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs world17.4%27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.4 / 100+16.8 pp vs world71.7%130 of 208 · highest-to-lowest37.7 / 100+14.9 pp vs world
Norway200743.0%85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest59.4 / 100+13.4 pp vs world29.0%167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest19.8 / 100+0.1 pp vs world14.0%30 of 208 · highest-to-lowest86.0 / 100+13.2 pp vs world71.9%131 of 208 · highest-to-lowest37.2 / 100+13.5 pp vs world
Norway200846.2%76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.1 / 100+15.3 pp vs world28.6%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-1.7 pp vs world17.7%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+16.9 pp vs world74.8%130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100+13.6 pp vs world
Norway200939.8%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+13.6 pp vs world27.7%167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100+2.0 pp vs world12.2%26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest88.0 / 100+11.5 pp vs world67.5%126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100+15.6 pp vs world
Norway201040.2%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100+11.6 pp vs world28.1%170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest19.1 / 100+0.4 pp vs world12.1%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+11.1 pp vs world68.2%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100+12.0 pp vs world
Norway201141.7%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100+11.3 pp vs world27.9%172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest18.2 / 100-1.5 pp vs world13.7%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+12.8 pp vs world69.6%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100+9.8 pp vs world
Norway201241.3%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+11.1 pp vs world27.2%177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world14.1%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+13.1 pp vs world68.5%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100+9.2 pp vs world
Norway201339.9%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+9.7 pp vs world28.1%175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.7 / 100-1.0 pp vs world11.7%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+10.7 pp vs world68.0%134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest36.4 / 100+8.8 pp vs world
Norway201439.7%91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100+10.0 pp vs world29.4%173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest17.7 / 100+0.5 pp vs world10.3%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+9.5 pp vs world69.1%131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest37.8 / 100+10.5 pp vs world
Norway201538.6%89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.9 / 100+10.5 pp vs world31.9%152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100+4.3 pp vs world6.7%36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+6.1 pp vs world70.4%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100+14.8 pp vs world
Norway201635.9%95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest55.0 / 100+8.7 pp vs world33.2%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100+6.8 pp vs world2.8%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+2.0 pp vs world69.1%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100+15.5 pp vs world
Norway201736.7%98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100+8.6 pp vs world32.4%151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest28.2 / 100+5.0 pp vs world4.4%45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.9 / 100+3.6 pp vs world69.1%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100+13.7 pp vs world
Norway201838.2%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100+9.1 pp vs world31.8%154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest26.8 / 100+3.5 pp vs world6.4%39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100+5.6 pp vs world70.0%129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.8 / 100+12.7 pp vs world
Norway201936.6%103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.2 / 100+8.5 pp vs world34.3%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100+6.8 pp vs world2.4%64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest69.9 / 100+1.8 pp vs world70.9%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100+15.3 pp vs world
Norway202032.2%90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+6.1 pp vs world33.1%130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100+7.7 pp vs world-0.9%87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.9 / 100-1.6 pp vs world65.4%117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest44.5 / 100+13.9 pp vs world
Norway202143.0%70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100+14.4 pp vs world28.2%168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest20.1 / 100+0.5 pp vs world14.8%21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+13.8 pp vs world71.2%121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100+14.9 pp vs world
Norway202255.5%61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest71.3 / 100+24.6 pp vs world27.1%176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-3.0 pp vs world28.4%11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest95.2 / 100+27.6 pp vs world82.6%114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 100+21.6 pp vs world
Norway202347.9%70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.0 / 100+18.9 pp vs world32.5%156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.8 / 100+4.1 pp vs world15.5%19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest91.4 / 100+14.8 pp vs world80.4%114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest45.9 / 100+23.0 pp vs world
Norway202447.5%67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+18.5 pp vs world33.9%144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.6 / 100+5.8 pp vs world13.6%20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+12.7 pp vs world81.4%109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100+24.3 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

Europe88.4%2024
Northern Europe93.8%2024
World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 41.1%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing2.2%
1970–1990-2.5 pp1990–2010-1.6 pp2010–2024+0.5 pp

World specialization: 0.53×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities35.6%
1970–1990+4.5 pp1990–2010+5.4 pp2010–2024+1.4 pp

World specialization: 1.69×

Construction5.1%
1970–1990-2.1 pp1990–2010+1.0 pp2010–2024-0.2 pp

World specialization: 0.89×

Trade, restaurants and hotels8.8%
1970–1990-4.3 pp1990–2010-3.2 pp2010–2024-0.3 pp

World specialization: 0.61×

Transport, storage and communication7.1%
1970–1990-4.3 pp1990–2010-2.5 pp2010–2024-2.6 pp

World specialization: 0.73×

Other activities41.1%
1970–1990+8.6 pp1990–2010+1.0 pp2010–2024+1.2 pp

World specialization: 0.92×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

A one-hundred-percent stacked area chart showing the changing share of six industries.0%25%50%75%100%1970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Broad industry structure over time

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

30.3% → 38.9%

Percentage-point change: +8.6 pp
Integration1990–2010

38.9% → 39.9%

Percentage-point change: +1.0 pp
Current era2010–2024

39.9% → 41.1%

Percentage-point change: +1.2 pp
How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing0.53×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities1.69×
Construction0.89×
Trade, restaurants and hotels0.61×
Transport, storage and communication0.73×
Other activities0.92×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table
Norway19705.8%139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-3.6 pp vs world24.3%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-6.5 pp vs world6.4%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-0.1 pp vs world16.6%70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+2.5 pp vs world16.5%2 of 177 · highest-to-lowest99.4 / 100+8.6 pp vs world30.3%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100-1.2 pp vs world
Norway19715.9%140 of 176 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-3.1 pp vs world23.6%72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.9 / 100-6.9 pp vs world6.7%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100+0.0 pp vs world16.4%74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100+2.3 pp vs world15.9%3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.9 / 100+8.0 pp vs world31.6%62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.5 / 100-0.4 pp vs world
Norway19725.3%142 of 176 · highest-to-lowest19.4 / 100-3.4 pp vs world23.8%76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.6 / 100-6.8 pp vs world6.5%79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest55.9 / 100-0.3 pp vs world16.6%73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+2.5 pp vs world15.4%3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.9 / 100+7.5 pp vs world32.4%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+0.3 pp vs world
Norway19735.1%144 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.3 / 100-4.0 pp vs world24.1%81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest54.8 / 100-6.7 pp vs world6.2%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-0.6 pp vs world16.0%78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest56.3 / 100+2.0 pp vs world15.8%3 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.9 / 100+8.1 pp vs world32.8%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Norway19745.0%143 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-3.6 pp vs world25.2%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-6.5 pp vs world6.0%85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.5 / 100-0.7 pp vs world16.6%68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world14.9%4 of 177 · highest-to-lowest98.3 / 100+7.2 pp vs world32.4%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+0.9 pp vs world
Norway19754.7%147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-3.6 pp vs world26.5%66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest63.3 / 100-4.1 pp vs world6.2%91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest49.2 / 100-0.6 pp vs world16.5%68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest61.9 / 100+2.4 pp vs world12.6%8 of 177 · highest-to-lowest96.0 / 100+5.0 pp vs world33.4%56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.9 / 100+0.8 pp vs world
Norway19765.0%139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.9 pp vs world26.3%68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.1 / 100-4.6 pp vs world6.1%94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest47.5 / 100-0.7 pp vs world16.2%73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+2.0 pp vs world12.1%11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest94.3 / 100+4.3 pp vs world34.4%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100+1.8 pp vs world
Norway19775.0%139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.7 pp vs world26.0%68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.1 / 100-4.7 pp vs world6.1%95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-0.6 pp vs world16.2%76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest57.4 / 100+2.0 pp vs world11.5%17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest90.9 / 100+3.6 pp vs world35.1%52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Norway19784.8%139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest21.1 / 100-2.8 pp vs world26.9%61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest66.1 / 100-3.6 pp vs world6.5%86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest52.0 / 100-0.3 pp vs world14.9%85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest52.3 / 100+0.7 pp vs world11.5%16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest91.5 / 100+3.5 pp vs world35.4%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100+2.3 pp vs world
Norway19794.3%143 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-3.1 pp vs world30.6%42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.8 / 100-0.2 pp vs world5.6%104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-1.2 pp vs world13.2%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-1.0 pp vs world11.6%15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest92.0 / 100+3.7 pp vs world34.8%55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest69.5 / 100+1.7 pp vs world
Norway19804.1%140 of 176 · highest-to-lowest20.6 / 100-2.8 pp vs world33.2%38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest79.1 / 100+2.1 pp vs world5.0%113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.7 / 100-1.7 pp vs world13.5%100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.8 / 100-0.7 pp vs world11.1%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+3.3 pp vs world33.1%63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest65.0 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Norway19814.1%143 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-2.7 pp vs world33.7%32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest82.5 / 100+3.1 pp vs world4.6%118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.9 / 100-1.9 pp vs world13.5%102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-0.9 pp vs world10.8%21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.6 / 100+3.0 pp vs world33.3%70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest61.0 / 100-0.9 pp vs world
Norway19823.8%143 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-3.0 pp vs world33.6%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100+3.8 pp vs world4.9%117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest34.5 / 100-1.3 pp vs world13.3%107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest39.8 / 100-0.9 pp vs world10.1%33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100+2.2 pp vs world34.3%64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest64.4 / 100-1.0 pp vs world
Norway19833.3%147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-3.6 pp vs world34.7%29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest84.2 / 100+5.4 pp vs world4.7%115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest35.6 / 100-1.3 pp vs world13.0%116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest34.7 / 100-1.4 pp vs world10.1%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100+2.1 pp vs world34.2%71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100-1.6 pp vs world
Norway19843.4%147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-3.4 pp vs world36.6%23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest87.6 / 100+7.4 pp vs world4.5%118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest33.9 / 100-1.3 pp vs world12.3%129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-2.3 pp vs world9.9%33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world33.3%73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest59.3 / 100-2.6 pp vs world
Norway19853.2%149 of 176 · highest-to-lowest15.4 / 100-3.2 pp vs world36.0%27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+7.2 pp vs world4.6%114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100-1.1 pp vs world12.8%120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest32.4 / 100-2.0 pp vs world9.9%33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100+1.9 pp vs world33.5%75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.2 / 100-3.1 pp vs world
Norway19863.6%147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-2.2 pp vs world28.4%46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest74.6 / 100+0.7 pp vs world5.4%83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest53.7 / 100-0.6 pp vs world14.3%101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest43.2 / 100-0.4 pp vs world11.1%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+3.0 pp vs world37.2%57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest68.4 / 100-0.6 pp vs world
Norway19873.7%144 of 176 · highest-to-lowest18.3 / 100-1.8 pp vs world27.2%53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest70.6 / 100-0.2 pp vs world5.7%77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-0.3 pp vs world14.2%102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest42.6 / 100-0.4 pp vs world10.6%22 of 177 · highest-to-lowest88.1 / 100+2.4 pp vs world38.6%48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest73.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world
Norway19883.5%145 of 176 · highest-to-lowest17.7 / 100-1.9 pp vs world25.2%74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest58.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world6.2%67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest62.7 / 100+0.0 pp vs world14.0%104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest41.5 / 100-0.6 pp vs world11.4%20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest89.2 / 100+3.3 pp vs world39.7%43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest76.3 / 100+1.1 pp vs world
Norway19893.3%147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-2.1 pp vs world27.8%53 of 179 · highest-to-lowest70.8 / 100+1.0 pp vs world5.2%96 of 179 · highest-to-lowest46.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world12.8%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-1.8 pp vs world11.9%18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest90.4 / 100+3.9 pp vs world39.1%48 of 179 · highest-to-lowest73.6 / 100-0.0 pp vs world
Norway19903.4%171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-1.8 pp vs world28.9%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.3 pp vs world4.4%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-1.9 pp vs world12.3%142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100-2.2 pp vs world12.2%20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+4.0 pp vs world38.9%50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100-0.6 pp vs world
Norway19913.3%168 of 204 · highest-to-lowest17.7 / 100-1.5 pp vs world28.4%62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.2 / 100+2.4 pp vs world3.6%157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100-2.4 pp vs world12.2%144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest29.9 / 100-2.7 pp vs world12.9%16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest92.6 / 100+4.6 pp vs world39.7%52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100-0.5 pp vs world
Norway19923.0%171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world28.1%61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest70.7 / 100+2.8 pp vs world3.6%162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest21.5 / 100-2.3 pp vs world12.0%143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.4 / 100-3.3 pp vs world12.3%21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.2 / 100+4.1 pp vs world41.0%49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-0.1 pp vs world
Norway19933.0%171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-1.2 pp vs world28.2%54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest74.1 / 100+3.5 pp vs world3.2%173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest16.1 / 100-2.8 pp vs world11.9%142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest30.9 / 100-3.2 pp vs world12.7%17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest92.2 / 100+4.3 pp vs world41.0%51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.6 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Norway19943.0%169 of 204 · highest-to-lowest17.2 / 100-1.0 pp vs world28.3%52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100+3.8 pp vs world3.7%161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-2.2 pp vs world11.9%147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest28.4 / 100-3.4 pp vs world12.2%20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest90.7 / 100+3.8 pp vs world40.9%52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest75.1 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Norway19953.0%171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-1.0 pp vs world29.1%48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest77.1 / 100+4.6 pp vs world4.1%151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.8 / 100-1.7 pp vs world12.0%145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest29.4 / 100-3.1 pp vs world11.8%25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest88.2 / 100+3.2 pp vs world40.0%58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100-2.0 pp vs world
Norway19962.6%172 of 204 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-1.5 pp vs world31.7%36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100+7.4 pp vs world4.0%153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest25.9 / 100-1.7 pp vs world11.8%149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.5 / 100-3.2 pp vs world11.3%29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest86.3 / 100+2.8 pp vs world38.6%64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest69.3 / 100-3.8 pp vs world
Norway19972.4%173 of 204 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-1.6 pp vs world32.0%30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.9 / 100+7.9 pp vs world4.3%143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest30.7 / 100-1.2 pp vs world11.5%156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.0 / 100-3.5 pp vs world11.5%31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest85.3 / 100+2.8 pp vs world38.3%67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.8 / 100-4.4 pp vs world
Norway19982.6%166 of 204 · highest-to-lowest18.7 / 100-1.2 pp vs world27.2%49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+4.1 pp vs world4.8%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-0.7 pp vs world12.4%146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest28.9 / 100-2.7 pp vs world12.3%26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest87.7 / 100+3.3 pp vs world40.7%58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest72.2 / 100-2.8 pp vs world
Norway19992.4%171 of 204 · highest-to-lowest16.3 / 100-1.2 pp vs world29.7%40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest81.0 / 100+6.7 pp vs world4.4%141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest31.7 / 100-1.0 pp vs world11.6%156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.0 / 100-3.5 pp vs world11.8%35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100+2.6 pp vs world40.1%60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest71.2 / 100-3.5 pp vs world
Norway20002.0%172 of 204 · highest-to-lowest15.8 / 100-1.4 pp vs world37.8%22 of 206 · highest-to-lowest89.8 / 100+14.3 pp vs world3.9%155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest24.9 / 100-1.5 pp vs world10.2%177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest13.7 / 100-4.8 pp vs world10.6%59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest71.6 / 100+1.5 pp vs world35.4%89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest57.1 / 100-8.2 pp vs world
Norway20011.7%180 of 204 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-1.7 pp vs world36.2%24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest88.8 / 100+13.6 pp vs world4.1%152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest26.3 / 100-1.3 pp vs world10.3%175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.7 / 100-4.7 pp vs world11.1%52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest75.0 / 100+1.9 pp vs world36.6%82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest60.5 / 100-7.9 pp vs world
Norway20021.7%180 of 204 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-1.7 pp vs world33.6%33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest84.4 / 100+11.5 pp vs world4.5%136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest34.1 / 100-0.8 pp vs world10.4%175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.7 / 100-4.5 pp vs world10.9%57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest72.5 / 100+1.6 pp vs world38.9%70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest66.3 / 100-6.1 pp vs world
Norway20031.4%180 of 204 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world33.6%31 of 206 · highest-to-lowest85.4 / 100+11.5 pp vs world4.5%141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest31.7 / 100-0.8 pp vs world10.0%178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest13.2 / 100-4.7 pp vs world10.7%60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest71.1 / 100+1.4 pp vs world39.7%68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest67.3 / 100-5.4 pp vs world
Norway20041.5%179 of 204 · highest-to-lowest12.3 / 100-2.0 pp vs world35.2%27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest87.3 / 100+12.6 pp vs world4.7%139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest32.7 / 100-0.7 pp vs world9.7%181 of 205 · highest-to-lowest11.8 / 100-5.0 pp vs world10.4%68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest67.2 / 100+0.9 pp vs world38.6%75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest63.9 / 100-5.8 pp vs world
Norway20051.5%173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-1.8 pp vs world38.3%25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.4 / 100+15.2 pp vs world4.7%134 of 208 · highest-to-lowest35.7 / 100-0.8 pp vs world9.0%188 of 207 · highest-to-lowest9.2 / 100-5.5 pp vs world10.0%82 of 207 · highest-to-lowest60.7 / 100+0.6 pp vs world36.5%93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest55.6 / 100-7.7 pp vs world
Norway20061.5%170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest17.2 / 100-1.8 pp vs world39.9%25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest88.4 / 100+16.4 pp vs world5.0%132 of 208 · highest-to-lowest36.7 / 100-0.7 pp vs world8.9%189 of 207 · highest-to-lowest8.7 / 100-5.5 pp vs world9.6%88 of 207 · highest-to-lowest57.8 / 100+0.4 pp vs world35.1%97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100-8.7 pp vs world
Norway20071.4%175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.7 / 100-2.2 pp vs world36.8%28 of 208 · highest-to-lowest87.0 / 100+13.2 pp vs world5.6%115 of 208 · highest-to-lowest44.9 / 100-0.2 pp vs world9.7%186 of 207 · highest-to-lowest10.2 / 100-4.5 pp vs world9.7%87 of 207 · highest-to-lowest58.3 / 100+0.3 pp vs world36.9%87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest58.5 / 100-6.7 pp vs world
Norway20081.2%176 of 207 · highest-to-lowest15.0 / 100-2.5 pp vs world40.1%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100+16.0 pp vs world5.3%136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.4 / 100-0.4 pp vs world9.0%189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-5.1 pp vs world9.1%103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest51.0 / 100-0.2 pp vs world35.4%100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.6 / 100-7.7 pp vs world
Norway20091.4%172 of 207 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-2.4 pp vs world33.5%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+11.2 pp vs world5.6%117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest44.5 / 100+0.0 pp vs world9.1%190 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-4.9 pp vs world9.8%81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest61.5 / 100+0.5 pp vs world40.7%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100-4.4 pp vs world
Norway20101.7%165 of 207 · highest-to-lowest20.4 / 100-2.3 pp vs world34.3%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+10.6 pp vs world5.3%124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100-0.0 pp vs world9.1%188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest10.1 / 100-4.9 pp vs world9.7%86 of 209 · highest-to-lowest59.1 / 100+0.6 pp vs world39.9%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100-3.9 pp vs world
Norway20111.5%176 of 207 · highest-to-lowest15.0 / 100-2.8 pp vs world36.6%31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.6 / 100+12.4 pp vs world5.4%120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-0.0 pp vs world8.6%189 of 209 · highest-to-lowest9.6 / 100-5.5 pp vs world9.1%94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest55.3 / 100+0.2 pp vs world38.8%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100-4.4 pp vs world
Norway20121.2%178 of 207 · highest-to-lowest14.1 / 100-3.1 pp vs world36.1%30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.1 / 100+12.0 pp vs world5.7%106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest49.8 / 100+0.3 pp vs world8.6%191 of 209 · highest-to-lowest8.7 / 100-5.6 pp vs world9.0%98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.4 / 100+0.1 pp vs world39.5%85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest59.8 / 100-3.7 pp vs world
Norway20131.4%173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest16.5 / 100-3.0 pp vs world34.7%29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest86.6 / 100+11.0 pp vs world5.7%102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest51.7 / 100+0.2 pp vs world8.3%194 of 209 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-5.8 pp vs world9.3%97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest53.8 / 100+0.4 pp vs world40.5%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100-2.8 pp vs world
Norway20141.5%172 of 207 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-2.9 pp vs world32.8%32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest85.2 / 100+9.5 pp vs world5.9%96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100+0.4 pp vs world8.8%195 of 209 · highest-to-lowest6.7 / 100-5.4 pp vs world9.2%99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest52.9 / 100+0.2 pp vs world41.7%71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.5 / 100-1.9 pp vs world
Norway20151.7%170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.0 / 100-2.8 pp vs world29.2%37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100+6.8 pp vs world6.3%83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.8 / 100+0.8 pp vs world9.2%198 of 209 · highest-to-lowest5.3 / 100-5.1 pp vs world9.6%93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest55.8 / 100+0.5 pp vs world44.0%63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest70.3 / 100-0.2 pp vs world
Norway20162.3%158 of 207 · highest-to-lowest23.8 / 100-2.1 pp vs world25.6%56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100+3.9 pp vs world6.6%74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest65.1 / 100+1.0 pp vs world9.7%193 of 209 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-4.6 pp vs world9.6%90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest57.2 / 100+0.3 pp vs world46.1%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+1.3 pp vs world
Norway20172.2%161 of 207 · highest-to-lowest22.3 / 100-2.2 pp vs world27.8%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100+5.8 pp vs world6.6%75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest64.6 / 100+0.9 pp vs world9.4%196 of 209 · highest-to-lowest6.3 / 100-5.0 pp vs world9.0%109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest48.1 / 100-0.2 pp vs world45.0%55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100+0.7 pp vs world
Norway20182.0%163 of 207 · highest-to-lowest21.4 / 100-2.1 pp vs world30.2%41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100+7.8 pp vs world6.4%84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest60.3 / 100+0.7 pp vs world9.3%197 of 209 · highest-to-lowest5.8 / 100-4.9 pp vs world8.5%122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest41.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world43.5%60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest71.8 / 100-0.7 pp vs world
Norway20192.0%163 of 207 · highest-to-lowest21.4 / 100-2.2 pp vs world26.8%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100+5.1 pp vs world6.7%77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.6 / 100+1.0 pp vs world9.6%194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-4.6 pp vs world9.1%104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.7 / 100-0.4 pp vs world45.7%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100+1.2 pp vs world
Norway20202.1%166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest19.9 / 100-2.5 pp vs world23.4%72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest66.0 / 100+2.4 pp vs world7.1%68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest67.9 / 100+1.3 pp vs world10.2%183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest12.9 / 100-3.5 pp vs world8.5%108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest48.8 / 100-0.8 pp vs world48.7%55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest74.2 / 100+3.1 pp vs world
Norway20211.8%168 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-2.8 pp vs world36.2%24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.0 / 100+13.9 pp vs world5.9%101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest52.2 / 100+0.1 pp vs world8.7%191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-5.2 pp vs world7.1%145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-2.4 pp vs world40.4%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100-3.7 pp vs world
Norway20221.8%168 of 207 · highest-to-lowest18.9 / 100-2.8 pp vs world48.4%14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest93.8 / 100+25.6 pp vs world4.7%135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest35.9 / 100-1.0 pp vs world7.1%198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest5.7 / 100-7.2 pp vs world6.0%162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.0 / 100-3.6 pp vs world32.1%124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.1 / 100-11.1 pp vs world
Norway20232.3%160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest22.8 / 100-2.0 pp vs world37.6%18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest91.9 / 100+15.9 pp vs world5.2%126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100-0.6 pp vs world8.6%193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.1 / 100-5.9 pp vs world6.8%149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.2 / 100-2.8 pp vs world39.4%88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest58.4 / 100-4.6 pp vs world
Norway20242.2%157 of 207 · highest-to-lowest24.3 / 100-2.0 pp vs world35.6%23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest89.5 / 100+14.5 pp vs world5.1%126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest40.2 / 100-0.6 pp vs world8.8%194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-5.7 pp vs world7.1%144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.6 / 100-2.7 pp vs world41.1%78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest63.2 / 100-3.4 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 6.8% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Norway was 8.9 percentage points below the world value.

Latest share
6.8%
World specialization
0.43×
Latest year
2024
Manufacturing share of total gross value added across the full AMA record, divided into three labeled analytical periods.1970–19901990–20102010–202431.124.718.211.75.31970198019902000201020202024

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

NorwayNorthern EuropeEuropeWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent
Chart tools

Download, cite, or reuse this chart

Download
Share
Reuse
Embed this chart

Manufacturing share of gross value added

Fixed-release embeds preserve the chart exactly as published. Always-latest embeds update when a new source release becomes current.

Open full preview
Formation1970–1990

20.3% → 11.6%

Percentage-point change: -8.7 pp
Integration1990–2010

11.6% → 8.2%

Percentage-point change: -3.4 pp
Current era2010–2024

8.2% → 6.8%

Percentage-point change: -1.4 pp
Share of total GVA6.8%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share within parent activity19.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Real manufacturing growth1.7%2024 · Published series · World rank 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Share of world manufacturing0.2%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest
Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table
Norway197020.3%45 of 176 · highest-to-lowest74.9 / 100-5.7 pp vs world83.2%79 of 176 · highest-to-lowest55.4 / 100-0.9 pp vs worldSource observation unavailableNot calculable without a source observationNot calculable without a source observationComparable world observation unavailable0.3%28 of 176 · highest-to-lowest84.6 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197119.9%46 of 176 · highest-to-lowest74.3 / 100-5.7 pp vs world84.2%71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+0.5 pp vs world2.3%127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest28.0 / 100-0.8 pp vs world0.3%28 of 176 · highest-to-lowest84.6 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197220.0%49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest72.6 / 100-5.5 pp vs world84.2%71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100+0.5 pp vs world4.6%101 of 176 · highest-to-lowest42.9 / 100-1.7 pp vs world0.3%27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest85.1 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197320.4%51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest71.4 / 100-5.2 pp vs world84.5%74 of 176 · highest-to-lowest58.3 / 100+1.4 pp vs world5.9%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100-3.1 pp vs world0.3%28 of 176 · highest-to-lowest84.6 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197420.8%47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest73.7 / 100-4.3 pp vs world82.6%80 of 176 · highest-to-lowest54.9 / 100+3.3 pp vs world3.9%109 of 176 · highest-to-lowest38.3 / 100+2.6 pp vs world0.3%27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest85.1 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197520.2%48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest73.1 / 100-4.0 pp vs world76.2%96 of 176 · highest-to-lowest45.7 / 100-2.9 pp vs world-2.6%127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest28.0 / 100+0.3 pp vs world0.4%27 of 176 · highest-to-lowest85.1 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway197618.9%64 of 176 · highest-to-lowest64.0 / 100-5.5 pp vs world71.7%106 of 176 · highest-to-lowest40.0 / 100-7.1 pp vs world-0.5%147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest16.6 / 100-7.7 pp vs world0.4%29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest84.0 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway197718.2%61 of 176 · highest-to-lowest65.7 / 100-5.9 pp vs world70.0%107 of 176 · highest-to-lowest39.4 / 100-8.4 pp vs world0.0%132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest25.1 / 100-3.9 pp vs world0.4%29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest84.0 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway197816.7%71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest60.0 / 100-7.4 pp vs world62.2%120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest32.0 / 100-16.8 pp vs world-1.8%153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest13.1 / 100-5.3 pp vs world0.3%31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest82.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway197917.7%66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest63.1 / 100-6.1 pp vs world57.8%125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest29.5 / 100-19.4 pp vs world4.4%95 of 176 · highest-to-lowest46.3 / 100+0.3 pp vs world0.3%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198015.0%81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest54.5 / 100-7.9 pp vs world45.3%139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-28.4 pp vs world-1.2%129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-1.4 pp vs world0.3%33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.8 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198113.9%88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest50.6 / 100-8.6 pp vs world41.3%148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest16.5 / 100-32.1 pp vs world-1.8%130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest26.7 / 100-3.1 pp vs world0.3%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198213.4%87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest51.1 / 100-8.7 pp vs world39.8%147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest17.0 / 100-34.3 pp vs world0.1%96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest46.0 / 100+1.8 pp vs world0.3%34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198313.0%91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest48.9 / 100-8.7 pp vs world37.5%150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-36.5 pp vs world-2.2%141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest20.5 / 100-4.1 pp vs world0.3%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198413.2%92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest48.3 / 100-8.6 pp vs world36.0%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-38.6 pp vs world5.8%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100+0.4 pp vs world0.3%36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.1 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198512.9%94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.2 / 100-8.8 pp vs world35.9%151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-39.6 pp vs world4.3%80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest55.1 / 100-0.0 pp vs world0.3%35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest80.7 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198613.5%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-8.4 pp vs world47.7%144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest18.8 / 100-31.6 pp vs world-0.4%137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest22.7 / 100-2.4 pp vs world0.3%31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.0 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198713.5%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-8.2 pp vs world49.7%139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-29.7 pp vs world2.0%123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest30.7 / 100-2.6 pp vs world0.3%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198813.7%93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest47.7 / 100-8.1 pp vs world54.3%132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest25.6 / 100-25.8 pp vs world-4.9%157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest11.4 / 100-10.6 pp vs world0.3%30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest83.5 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway198912.6%99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100-8.8 pp vs world45.3%144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest19.2 / 100-34.5 pp vs world-4.0%153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest13.6 / 100-6.7 pp vs world0.3%31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest83.1 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199011.6%127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 100-9.2 pp vs world40.2%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-38.2 pp vs world-1.2%123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-2.4 pp vs world0.3%35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest83.3 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199111.2%130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest36.8 / 100-9.3 pp vs world39.5%175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.7 / 100-39.2 pp vs world-2.6%140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest31.9 / 100-2.6 pp vs world0.3%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199211.3%126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.7 / 100-8.5 pp vs world40.2%174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.2 / 100-38.0 pp vs world1.0%109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.1 / 100+1.5 pp vs world0.3%37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199311.6%117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-7.5 pp vs world41.1%172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest16.2 / 100-36.4 pp vs world1.8%95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest53.9 / 100+2.5 pp vs world0.3%39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199411.9%116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest43.6 / 100-7.3 pp vs world42.0%172 of 205 · highest-to-lowest16.2 / 100-36.3 pp vs world2.8%112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest45.6 / 100-0.7 pp vs world0.3%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199512.5%109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.1 / 100-6.7 pp vs world42.7%173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-35.3 pp vs world0.3%152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest26.0 / 100-4.6 pp vs world0.3%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199611.6%117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest43.1 / 100-7.0 pp vs world36.6%175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.7 / 100-39.9 pp vs world4.4%89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest56.9 / 100+1.8 pp vs world0.3%36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.8 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199711.6%114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest44.6 / 100-6.7 pp vs world36.2%176 of 205 · highest-to-lowest14.2 / 100-39.9 pp vs world4.9%104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest49.5 / 100+0.3 pp vs world0.3%40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199812.2%106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest48.5 / 100-5.6 pp vs world44.8%168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest18.1 / 100-32.0 pp vs world-0.7%149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.5 / 100-2.1 pp vs world0.3%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway199911.7%109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest47.1 / 100-5.9 pp vs world39.2%173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest15.7 / 100-36.7 pp vs world0.5%148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest27.9 / 100-2.8 pp vs world0.3%37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway200010.2%128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest37.7 / 100-7.2 pp vs world26.9%185 of 205 · highest-to-lowest9.8 / 100-47.0 pp vs world1.0%155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.5 / 100-5.4 pp vs world0.3%40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest80.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway200110.2%127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 100-6.2 pp vs world28.2%187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest8.8 / 100-44.4 pp vs world-0.8%156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest24.0 / 100-0.1 pp vs world0.3%39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway200210.2%127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 100-5.7 pp vs world30.3%186 of 205 · highest-to-lowest9.3 / 100-41.8 pp vs world-0.7%161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest21.6 / 100-1.7 pp vs world0.3%38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest81.9 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway200310.1%127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest38.2 / 100-5.7 pp vs world30.1%184 of 205 · highest-to-lowest10.3 / 100-41.4 pp vs world3.1%106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest48.5 / 100-0.3 pp vs world0.3%37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20049.7%132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest36.1 / 100-7.5 pp vs world27.6%183 of 206 · highest-to-lowest11.2 / 100-48.9 pp vs world4.4%105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest49.0 / 100-15.2 pp vs world0.3%37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest82.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20059.2%135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest35.3 / 100-7.8 pp vs world24.1%184 of 208 · highest-to-lowest11.6 / 100-49.9 pp vs world3.8%116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest43.9 / 100-0.5 pp vs world0.3%37 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.6 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20069.4%133 of 208 · highest-to-lowest36.2 / 100-7.7 pp vs world23.5%182 of 208 · highest-to-lowest12.6 / 100-49.1 pp vs world2.4%148 of 207 · highest-to-lowest28.6 / 100-4.2 pp vs world0.3%37 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.6 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20079.4%128 of 208 · highest-to-lowest38.6 / 100-7.7 pp vs world25.5%182 of 208 · highest-to-lowest12.6 / 100-46.9 pp vs world3.9%117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest43.7 / 100-2.2 pp vs world0.4%38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest82.1 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway20088.7%139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.0 / 100-8.2 pp vs world21.7%192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.6 / 100-48.3 pp vs world2.9%95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest54.6 / 100+1.7 pp vs world0.4%40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest81.3 / 100-99.6 pp vs world
Norway20098.4%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-7.8 pp vs world25.0%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-47.6 pp vs world-7.4%144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.6 / 100-1.1 pp vs world0.3%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20108.2%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-8.6 pp vs world23.8%187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-47.0 pp vs world1.4%152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-7.6 pp vs world0.3%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20117.6%146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.6 / 100-9.2 pp vs world20.8%193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.1 / 100-48.5 pp vs world1.7%143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.1 / 100-2.6 pp vs world0.3%42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest80.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20127.5%148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.7 / 100-9.3 pp vs world20.7%193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.1 / 100-48.8 pp vs world2.0%105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest50.2 / 100-0.3 pp vs world0.3%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20137.5%147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-9.1 pp vs world21.6%191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-48.4 pp vs world3.1%92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest56.5 / 100-0.1 pp vs world0.3%44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest79.4 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20147.7%146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.6 / 100-9.0 pp vs world23.5%192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.6 / 100-48.3 pp vs world2.9%98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest53.6 / 100-1.3 pp vs world0.3%46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.5 / 100-99.7 pp vs world
Norway20157.8%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-9.2 pp vs world26.8%191 of 210 · highest-to-lowest9.1 / 100-49.4 pp vs world-4.5%179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest14.8 / 100-8.1 pp vs world0.2%47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest78.0 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20167.5%141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest33.0 / 100-9.2 pp vs world29.4%188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.5 / 100-47.9 pp vs world-4.1%187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest11.0 / 100-6.6 pp vs world0.2%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20177.3%145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest31.1 / 100-9.4 pp vs world26.3%189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.0 / 100-49.8 pp vs world0.2%160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest23.9 / 100-3.1 pp vs world0.2%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20186.9%153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.3 / 100-10.0 pp vs world22.7%193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest8.1 / 100-52.4 pp vs world1.8%142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest32.5 / 100-2.2 pp vs world0.2%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20197.1%148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.7 / 100-9.3 pp vs world26.3%188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest10.5 / 100-49.2 pp vs world1.8%111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest47.4 / 100+0.4 pp vs world0.2%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20207.5%147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest30.1 / 100-8.8 pp vs world31.9%178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest15.3 / 100-45.7 pp vs world-5.3%112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.9 / 100-2.9 pp vs world0.2%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20216.2%156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest25.8 / 100-10.6 pp vs world17.2%200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest4.8 / 100-58.2 pp vs world5.7%113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest46.4 / 100-3.3 pp vs world0.2%48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.5 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20225.3%164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest22.0 / 100-11.1 pp vs world10.9%202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest3.8 / 100-61.0 pp vs world1.3%138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest34.4 / 100-0.7 pp vs world0.2%50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.6 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20236.6%152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest27.8 / 100-9.3 pp vs world17.6%195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.2 / 100-55.8 pp vs world0.0%123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest41.6 / 100-1.5 pp vs world0.2%51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest76.1 / 100-99.8 pp vs world
Norway20246.8%149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest29.2 / 100-8.9 pp vs world19.1%194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest7.7 / 100-55.0 pp vs world1.7%119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest43.5 / 100-1.2 pp vs world0.2%49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest77.0 / 100-99.8 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

Europe0.47×
Northern Europe0.55×
World0.43×