Source-specific country analysis
Liechtenstein Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
ReleaseJanuary 28, 2026Observations1970–20243 analysis periods1970–1990 · 1990–2010 · 2010–2024Currency basesNational · U.S. dollars
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
Formation1970–1990
Integration1990–2010
Current era2010–2024
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | $110.62M | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $5,232 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 563.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | $128.78M | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | $5,964 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 595.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | $153.39M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | $6,975 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 617.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | $206.18M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | $9,206 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 682.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | $248.17M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $10,884 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 726.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | $285.70M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.7% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $12,316 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 748.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | $322.29M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $13,664 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 782.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | $375.99M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $15,685 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 811.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | $522.50M | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | $21,460 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 953.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | $627.06M | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $25,365 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 996.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | $684.83M | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | $27,295 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 978.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | $608.06M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $23,881 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | 852.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | $628.59M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.6% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | $24,320 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 891.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | $637.89M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | $24,312 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 884.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | $634.27M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.3% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $23,821 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 858.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | $681.30M | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.0% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $25,225 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 900.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | $1.01B | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $36,830 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1161.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | $1.27B | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.2% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | $45,753 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1299.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | $1.45B | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $51,641 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1334.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | $1.45B | 131 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.2% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | $50,864 | 2 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1280.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | $1.76B | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.5% | 156 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | $60,784 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1401.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | $1.90B | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | $64,852 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1447.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | $2.03B | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.9% | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $68,400 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1449.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | $2.01B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $66,648 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1407.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | $2.25B | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | $73,382 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1474.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | $2.70B | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.9% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $86,851 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1596.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | $2.72B | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $86,362 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1576.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | $2.56B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.2% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | $80,361 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1494.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | $2.74B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.9% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | $84,866 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1610.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | $2.95B | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 10.4% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | $90,033 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1666.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | $2.75B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $82,964 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1511.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | $2.76B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | $82,404 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1529.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | $2.97B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.0% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | $88,128 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1593.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | $3.40B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.9% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | $99,715 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1628.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | $3.82B | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | $111,097 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1632.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | $4.05B | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $116,634 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1600.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | $4.42B | 146 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.0% | 38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.1 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | $126,493 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1622.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | $5.09B | 148 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.3% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | $144,472 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1663.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | $5.62B | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.7% | 197 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | $158,563 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1684.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | $4.98B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -10.5% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | $139,481 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1581.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | $5.62B | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.4% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | $156,145 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1636.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | $6.35B | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -4.1% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | $175,024 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1669.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | $6.03B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.1% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $164,893 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1559.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | $6.39B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.9% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $173,170 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1610.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | $6.66B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | $179,142 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1643.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | $6.27B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | $167,607 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1645.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | $6.24B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.3% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $165,819 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1620.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | $6.47B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | $171,052 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1588.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | $6.69B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.9% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | $175,524 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1552.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | $6.44B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $167,453 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1475.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | $6.41B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.7% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $165,219 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1507.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | $7.91B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | $202,659 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1632.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | $7.43B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $188,897 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1475.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | $8.24B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.1% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | $208,076 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1569.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | $8.63B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | $216,392 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1582.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$110.62M → $1.76B
Compound annual change: +14.8% CAGR$1.76B → $5.62B
Compound annual change: +6.0% CAGR$5.62B → $8.63B
Compound annual change: +3.1% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | $110.62M | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.58B | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | $128.78M | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.60B | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | $153.39M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.63B | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | $206.18M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.66B | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | $248.17M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.68B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | $285.70M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.71B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | $322.29M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.79B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | $375.99M | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.88B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | $522.50M | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $1.97B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | $627.06M | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.06B | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 136 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | $684.83M | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.16B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | $608.06M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.26B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | $628.59M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.23B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | $637.89M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.24B | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | $634.27M | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.33B | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | $681.30M | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.50B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | $1.01B | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.60B | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | $1.27B | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.84B | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | $1.45B | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.00B | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | $1.45B | 131 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.24B | 123 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 31.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 131 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | $1.76B | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.16B | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | $1.90B | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.33B | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | $2.03B | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.37B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | $2.01B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.39B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | $2.25B | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.47B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | $2.70B | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.54B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | $2.72B | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.70B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | $2.56B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.08B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | $2.74B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.36B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | $2.95B | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.81B | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | $2.75B | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.96B | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | $2.76B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.93B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | $2.97B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.88B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | $3.40B | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.78B | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | $3.82B | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $4.93B | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | $4.05B | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.17B | 149 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | $4.42B | 146 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.63B | 150 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 146 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | $5.09B | 148 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.15B | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 148 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | $5.62B | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.99B | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | $4.98B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.36B | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | $5.62B | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.75B | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | $6.35B | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.52B | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | $6.03B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.58B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | $6.39B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $5.86B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | $6.66B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.03B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | $6.27B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.03B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | $6.24B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.17B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | $6.47B | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.37B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | $6.69B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.43B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | $6.44B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.45B | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | $6.41B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.41B | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | $7.91B | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.44B | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | $7.43B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.63B | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | $8.24B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.77B | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | $8.63B | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $6.84B | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
Europe$27.20T2024
Western Europe$11.28T2024
World$111.57T2024
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$5,232 → $60,784
Compound annual change: +13.0% CAGR$60,784 → $156,145
Compound annual change: +4.8% CAGR$156,145 → $216,392
Compound annual change: +2.4% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | $5,232 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 563.6 (world = 100) | $74,501 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1435.8 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | $5,964 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 595.5 (world = 100) | $74,163 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1399.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | $6,975 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 617.3 (world = 100) | $74,036 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1352.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | $9,206 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 682.7 (world = 100) | $73,911 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1293.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | $10,884 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 726.0 (world = 100) | $73,810 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1289.3 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | $12,316 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 748.3 (world = 100) | $73,761 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1301.7 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | $13,664 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 782.1 (world = 100) | $75,996 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1297.9 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | $15,685 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 811.4 (world = 100) | $78,338 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1307.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | $21,460 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 953.4 (world = 100) | $80,795 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1314.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | $25,365 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 996.5 (world = 100) | $83,362 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1326.9 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | $27,295 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 978.1 (world = 100) | $86,045 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1368.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | $23,881 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 | 852.5 (world = 100) | $88,870 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 1411.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | $24,320 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 891.1 (world = 100) | $86,154 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1387.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | $24,312 | 3 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | 884.8 (world = 100) | $85,328 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1360.3 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | $23,821 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | 858.0 (world = 100) | $87,685 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1359.4 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | $25,225 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 | 900.9 (world = 100) | $92,513 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1410.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | $36,830 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1161.5 (world = 100) | $94,896 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1428.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | $45,753 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1299.1 (world = 100) | $102,256 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1512.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | $51,641 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1334.6 (world = 100) | $106,524 | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1534.8 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | $50,864 | 2 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | 1280.0 (world = 100) | $113,722 | 1 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1608.2 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | $60,784 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1401.0 (world = 100) | $109,486 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1529.7 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | $64,852 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1447.7 (world = 100) | $113,898 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1599.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | $68,400 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1449.7 (world = 100) | $113,246 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1582.9 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | $66,648 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1407.5 (world = 100) | $112,242 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1566.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | $73,382 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1474.5 (world = 100) | $113,423 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1555.2 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | $86,851 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1596.8 (world = 100) | $114,013 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1538.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | $86,362 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1576.9 (world = 100) | $117,547 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1554.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | $80,361 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1494.9 (world = 100) | $127,774 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1649.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | $84,866 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1610.2 (world = 100) | $134,778 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1715.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | $90,033 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1666.3 (world = 100) | $146,941 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1830.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | $82,964 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1511.2 (world = 100) | $149,904 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1811.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | $82,404 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1529.7 (world = 100) | $147,333 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1767.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | $88,128 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1593.6 (world = 100) | $144,580 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1719.7 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | $99,715 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1628.2 (world = 100) | $140,455 | 1 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1642.8 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | $111,097 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1632.1 (world = 100) | $143,339 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1626.4 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | $116,634 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1600.7 (world = 100) | $148,952 | 1 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1646.3 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | $126,493 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1622.2 (world = 100) | $160,970 | 1 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1725.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | $144,472 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1663.6 (world = 100) | $174,705 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1817.9 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | $158,563 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1684.0 (world = 100) | $168,921 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1745.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | $139,481 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1581.1 (world = 100) | $150,014 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1592.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | $156,145 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1636.7 (world = 100) | $159,858 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1645.7 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | $175,024 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1669.8 (world = 100) | $152,219 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1536.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | $164,893 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1559.8 (world = 100) | $152,482 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1517.2 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | $173,170 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1610.8 (world = 100) | $158,629 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1554.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | $179,142 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1643.6 (world = 100) | $162,239 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1561.6 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | $167,607 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1645.7 (world = 100) | $161,283 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1523.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | $165,819 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1620.6 (world = 100) | $164,102 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1526.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | $171,052 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | 1588.8 (world = 100) | $168,256 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1530.4 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | $175,524 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1552.5 (world = 100) | $168,585 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1501.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | $167,453 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1475.5 (world = 100) | $167,840 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1472.1 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | $165,219 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1507.5 (world = 100) | $165,219 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1507.5 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | $202,659 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1632.3 (world = 100) | $165,004 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1426.8 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | $188,897 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1475.2 (world = 100) | $168,504 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1422.0 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | $208,076 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1569.8 (world = 100) | $170,870 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1413.4 (world = 100) |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | $216,392 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1582.6 (world = 100) | $171,515 | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | 1391.6 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
Europe$36,4082024
Western Europe$55,8372024
World$13,6732024
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
1.7% → -2.5%
Average annual rate: +3.6%-2.5% → 7.4%
Average annual rate: +2.9%7.4% → 1.1%
Average annual rate: +1.7%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 32.7 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 1.7% | 147 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | -0.5% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 35.4 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 1.7% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 38.3 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 1.7% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | -0.2% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 42.0 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 1.7% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | -0.1% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 46.8 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 1.7% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -0.1% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 45.9 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 4.8% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 3.0% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 47.9 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 4.8% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 3.1% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 51.3 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 4.8% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 3.1% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 50.6 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 4.8% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 3.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 53.9 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 4.8% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 3.2% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 56.6 | 7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 4.8% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 3.3% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 56.2 | 10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.9 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | -1.6% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | -3.1% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 61.0 | 7 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.6 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 0.5% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | -1.0% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 63.7 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 4.3% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 68.0 | 6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 7.0% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 5.5% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 71.4 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 4.0% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 2.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 74.4 | 4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 9.2% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 7.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 71.1 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 5.6% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 75.6 | 5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 97.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 8.2% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 6.8% | 18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 77.9 | 5 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 97.8 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | -2.5% | 156 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | -3.7% | 151 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 82.1 | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 5.4% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 4.0% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 87.0 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 0.9% | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | -0.6% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 90.5 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 0.6% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | -0.9% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 93.4 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 2.5% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 1.1% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 94.2 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 1.9% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 0.5% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 95.9 | 4 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 98.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 4.6% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 3.1% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 96.7 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 10.2% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 8.7% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 97.2 | 3 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 6.9% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 5.5% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 97.2 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 10.4% | 15 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 9.0% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 98.0 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 3.2% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 2.0% | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 99.5 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | -0.7% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | -1.7% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 100.5 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | -1.0% | 189 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -1.9% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 101.2 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | -1.9% | 193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | -2.9% | 190 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 101.8 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 3.0% | 153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 2.1% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 102.6 | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 4.8% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 3.9% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 103.8 | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 9.0% | 38 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.1 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 8.1% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 104.9 | 5 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 9.3% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 8.5% | 32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 105.7 | 5 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | -2.7% | 197 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -3.3% | 193 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 108.3 | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | -10.5% | 199 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | -11.2% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 107.8 | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 7.4% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 6.6% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 108.5 | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | -4.1% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | -4.8% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 108.7 | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 1.1% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 0.2% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 108.0 | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 4.9% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 4.0% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 107.8 | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 3.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 2.3% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 107.7 | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 0.0% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | -0.6% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 106.5 | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 2.3% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 106.0 | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 3.2% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 2.5% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 106.6 | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 0.9% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 108.4 | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 0.4% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | -0.4% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 105.6 | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | -0.7% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | -1.6% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 0.6% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | -0.1% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 119.5 | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 2.8% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 2.1% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 114.0 | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 2.1% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 1.4% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 116.5 | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 1.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 118.3 | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
Europe1.3%2024
Western Europe0.5%2024
World2.8%2024
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
63.3% → 64.9%
Percentage-point change: +1.6 pp64.9% → 64.5%
Percentage-point change: -0.4 pp64.5% → 62.8%
Percentage-point change: -1.7 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | 63.3% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 55.5% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 7.8% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 103.8% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 62.9% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -10.2 pp vs world | 54.8% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 8.1% | 159 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 103.7% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 62.9% | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 54.9% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 8.1% | 157 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 102.8% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 63.5% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 55.2% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 158 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 102.8% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 64.3% | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 55.6% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 8.6% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 103.5% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 67.3% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 58.0% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 9.4% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 96.2% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 68.9% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 59.2% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 9.8% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 95.0% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 69.6% | 138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 60.0% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 9.6% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 95.7% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 68.9% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 59.3% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 9.5% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 96.1% | 150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 69.6% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 60.0% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 9.6% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 99.6% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 69.4% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 59.9% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 9.4% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 103.5% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 69.2% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 59.6% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 9.6% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 100.6% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | 69.5% | 148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 59.7% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 9.8% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 100.6% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 70.6% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 60.4% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 10.1% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 102.1% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 68.9% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 59.0% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 9.9% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 98.0% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 68.5% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 58.4% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 10.0% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 98.3% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 67.9% | 156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 57.7% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 10.2% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 99.8% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 67.8% | 154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 57.7% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 10.1% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 99.3% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 66.6% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 56.3% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 10.3% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 99.2% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 65.7% | 155 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 55.0% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 10.7% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 99.0% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | 64.9% | 179 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 54.0% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 10.9% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 99.8% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 66.9% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 55.4% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 11.5% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 98.6% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 68.5% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 56.6% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 11.8% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 97.4% | 156 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 68.5% | 177 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 56.6% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 11.8% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 96.0% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 67.7% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 55.9% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 11.9% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 96.0% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 68.1% | 180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 56.3% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 11.8% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 96.2% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 69.1% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 57.2% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 11.9% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 96.7% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 69.4% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 57.8% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 11.6% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 95.5% | 170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 68.8% | 181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 12.2 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 57.5% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 11.3% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 96.2% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 69.2% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 57.8% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 11.4% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 96.3% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 67.8% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 56.7% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 11.2% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 95.1% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | 67.9% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 56.8% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 11.2% | 166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 95.6% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | 68.4% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 56.9% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 94.7% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | 68.9% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 57.2% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 11.7% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 94.9% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 68.4% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 56.9% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 11.5% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 92.9% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 67.4% | 166 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 56.1% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 11.2% | 158 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 23.8 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 94.6% | 161 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.3 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 65.1% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 54.4% | 149 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 10.7% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 93.0% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 63.4% | 172 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.4 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 53.0% | 155 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 25.2 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 10.4% | 164 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 90.2% | 175 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 15.5 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | 63.1% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -10.8 pp vs world | 52.5% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 10.6% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 90.5% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | 65.4% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 54.0% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 11.4% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 93.8% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 64.5% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 53.3% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 11.2% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 90.4% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | 64.2% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 52.9% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 11.3% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 92.7% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 64.2% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 52.9% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 11.3% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 90.9% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 64.4% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 53.0% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 11.4% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 89.6% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 64.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 52.5% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 11.5% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 89.5% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 64.4% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 52.9% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 11.5% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 89.5% | 190 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 64.4% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 52.9% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 11.5% | 170 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 89.9% | 188 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 64.9% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 53.4% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 11.5% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 90.9% | 186 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 11.1 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 63.7% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 52.5% | 159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 11.3% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 89.5% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 63.8% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 52.4% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 11.4% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 90.2% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | 64.0% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 51.9% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 12.1% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 93.6% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 61.6% | 187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.0 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 49.7% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 11.9% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 87.8% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 61.4% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 50.1% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 11.3% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 86.2% | 180 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 62.7% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 51.0% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 11.6% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 88.7% | 184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 62.8% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 51.1% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 11.7% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 89.8% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
Europe74.5%2024
Western Europe74.3%2024
World73.2%2024
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
40.5% → 34.9%
Percentage-point change: -5.6 pp34.9% → 25.9%
Percentage-point change: -9.0 pp25.9% → 27.0%
Percentage-point change: +1.1 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | 40.5% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 35.4% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 5.1% | 20 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 40.8% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 37.6% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 3.1% | 36 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 39.9% | 14 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 38.2% | 15 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.0 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 1.7% | 51 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 39.3% | 14 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 37.8% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 1.5% | 70 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 50.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 39.2% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 35.5% | 20 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 43 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 28.9% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 30.9% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | -2.1% | 125 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 26.0% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 26.5% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | -0.5% | 112 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 26.0% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 26.7% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | -0.6% | 119 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 14.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 27.3% | 66 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 27.6% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | -0.3% | 110 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 30.0% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 28.1% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 1.9% | 58 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 34.2% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 30.6% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 3.5% | 33 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 31.4% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 30.9% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.5% | 90 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | 31.1% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 29.3% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 1.8% | 49 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 31.5% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 30.0% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 1.5% | 42 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 29.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 29.8% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | -0.7% | 127 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 29.9% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 30.1% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | -0.3% | 119 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 31.9% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 30.9% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 1.0% | 59 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 31.5% | 24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 31.2% | 21 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 88.6 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 0.3% | 94 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 32.5% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 33.0% | 18 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | -0.4% | 129 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 33.3% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 33.5% | 20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | -0.2% | 121 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | 34.9% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 33.0% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 2.0% | 55 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 31.7% | 32 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.8 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 31.6% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 120 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 29.0% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 28.3% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.6% | 87 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 48.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 27.6% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 26.5% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 1.0% | 64 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 28.3% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 26.8% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 1.5% | 65 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 28.1% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 26.7% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 1.3% | 74 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 27.6% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 25.6% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 2.0% | 47 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 26.1% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 25.7% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 0.4% | 104 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 27.4% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 26.8% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 90 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 46.7 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 27.1% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 27.3% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | -0.2% | 122 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 27.2% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 27.5% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | -0.3% | 151 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | 27.7% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 26.9% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 0.8% | 77 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | 26.2% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 27.1% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | -0.9% | 159 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 9.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | 26.0% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 26.5% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | -0.5% | 157 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 9.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 24.5% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 27.3% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | -2.8% | 173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 27.2% | 63 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 27.3% | 48 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.2 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | -0.1% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 27.9% | 64 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 27.1% | 57 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 72.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 91 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 26.8% | 77 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 27.2% | 61 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 70.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | -0.4% | 159 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 11.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | 27.4% | 83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 26.7% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 107 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | 28.3% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 25.2% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 3.1% | 16 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 91.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 25.9% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 25.2% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.7% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | 28.5% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 25.5% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 3.0% | 33 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 26.7% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 26.3% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 25.2% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 26.2% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | -1.1% | 164 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 6.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 25.6% | 75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 26.4% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | -0.9% | 161 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 8.0 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 25.1% | 85 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 26.4% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | -1.3% | 165 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 25.6% | 73 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 26.5% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | -0.9% | 158 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 26.0% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 27.1% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | -1.1% | 167 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 4.6 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 25.7% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 26.6% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | -0.9% | 170 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 26.4% | 63 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 26.6% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | -0.2% | 151 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 13.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | 29.6% | 46 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 27.0% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 2.6% | 25 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 26.2% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 26.3% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | -0.1% | 154 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 24.8% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 25.7% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | -0.8% | 160 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 26.0% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 25.8% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 103 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 39.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 27.0% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 25.1% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 1.9% | 39 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
Europe21.8%2024
Western Europe21.8%2024
World26.0%2024
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Liechtenstein is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
82.9% → 82.5%
Percentage-point change: -0.4 pp82.5% → 120.1%
Percentage-point change: +37.6 pp120.1% → 134.1%
Percentage-point change: +14.0 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | 41.3% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +30.0 pp vs world | 41.6% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +30.3 pp vs world | -0.3% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 82.9% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +60.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 39.2% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +27.8 pp vs world | 39.4% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +28.0 pp vs world | -0.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 78.6% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +55.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 38.6% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world | 38.0% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 76.7% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +53.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 39.0% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +25.8 pp vs world | 38.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world | 0.4% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 77.6% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +51.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 41.0% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +24.9 pp vs world | 41.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +25.5 pp vs world | -0.6% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 82.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +50.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 39.6% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +24.4 pp vs world | 34.4% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 5.2% | 25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 74.1% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +43.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 42.4% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | 36.5% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 5.8% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 78.9% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +47.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 46.2% | 41 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +30.4 pp vs world | 41.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +25.0 pp vs world | 5.1% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 87.3% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +55.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 44.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | 39.4% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 4.9% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 83.6% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +52.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 44.5% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +27.6 pp vs world | 43.2% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +26.1 pp vs world | 1.3% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 87.8% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +53.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 46.3% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +28.0 pp vs world | 48.6% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +30.0 pp vs world | -2.2% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 94.9% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +58.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 48.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world | 47.7% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +29.4 pp vs world | 0.5% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 96.0% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +59.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | 44.4% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 43.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +26.5 pp vs world | 0.6% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 88.2% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +53.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 43.1% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 44.1% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | -1.0% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 87.2% | 61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.1 / 100 | +54.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 47.3% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +30.4 pp vs world | 44.5% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 91.8% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +57.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 47.8% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +31.3 pp vs world | 45.2% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +28.5 pp vs world | 2.5% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 93.0% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +59.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 44.0% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +28.1 pp vs world | 43.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +27.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 87.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +55.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 41.2% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +24.7 pp vs world | 39.9% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +23.3 pp vs world | 1.3% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 81.1% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +48.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 42.4% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +25.4 pp vs world | 41.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 1.3% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 83.5% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +49.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 44.8% | 44 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 75.8 / 100 | +27.4 pp vs world | 43.6% | 66 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +25.8 pp vs world | 1.2% | 57 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 68.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 88.4% | 59 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +53.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | 41.4% | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | +22.4 pp vs world | 41.2% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 82.5% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +44.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 39.8% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world | 38.4% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 1.4% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 78.2% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +41.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 40.7% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +21.0 pp vs world | 38.2% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 2.6% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 78.9% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +39.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 40.8% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 36.9% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +18.5 pp vs world | 4.0% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 77.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +40.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 40.1% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 36.1% | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 4.0% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 76.2% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +37.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 40.0% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 36.2% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | +16.1 pp vs world | 3.8% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 76.3% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +35.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 41.0% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +19.9 pp vs world | 37.7% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 3.3% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 78.8% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +37.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 46.5% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | 42.0% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +20.5 pp vs world | 4.5% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 88.5% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +45.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 46.0% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | 42.2% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | 3.8% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 88.2% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +45.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 46.8% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +24.9 pp vs world | 43.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 3.7% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 89.8% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +46.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 51.4% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world | 46.5% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | 4.9% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 97.9% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +51.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | 50.2% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +27.3 pp vs world | 45.8% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 4.4% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 96.0% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +50.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | 48.6% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +25.4 pp vs world | 43.2% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 5.3% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 91.8% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +45.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | 47.7% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 42.6% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 5.1% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 90.3% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +42.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 51.3% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world | 44.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 7.1% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 95.5% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +44.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 53.9% | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +26.8 pp vs world | 48.4% | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +21.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 102.3% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +48.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 56.6% | 53 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.9 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world | 49.6% | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 7.0% | 48 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 106.2% | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | +49.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 61.6% | 40 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.2 / 100 | +32.0 pp vs world | 51.8% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | +22.9 pp vs world | 9.8% | 34 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 113.3% | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +54.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | 63.1% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +32.2 pp vs world | 53.6% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | 9.5% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 116.8% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +55.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | 58.0% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +31.8 pp vs world | 51.8% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +26.2 pp vs world | 6.2% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 109.8% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +57.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 64.8% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +36.3 pp vs world | 55.2% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +27.6 pp vs world | 9.6% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 120.1% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +63.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | 66.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +36.1 pp vs world | 59.1% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +29.6 pp vs world | 7.3% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 125.6% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +65.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 67.8% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +37.6 pp vs world | 58.7% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +29.5 pp vs world | 9.1% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 126.5% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +67.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 72.1% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +42.0 pp vs world | 61.6% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +32.5 pp vs world | 10.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 133.7% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +74.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 65.3% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world | 54.9% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +25.9 pp vs world | 10.5% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 120.2% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +61.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 63.8% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +35.7 pp vs world | 53.3% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +25.8 pp vs world | 10.5% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 117.1% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +61.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 66.8% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +39.6 pp vs world | 56.7% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +30.4 pp vs world | 10.1% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 123.6% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +70.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 66.3% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +38.3 pp vs world | 57.3% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +29.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 123.6% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +68.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 67.5% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +38.4 pp vs world | 57.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +28.7 pp vs world | 10.5% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 124.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +67.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 67.0% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world | 57.2% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +29.7 pp vs world | 9.8% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 124.1% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +68.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | 64.1% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +38.0 pp vs world | 57.7% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +32.3 pp vs world | 6.4% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 121.8% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +70.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 71.1% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +42.5 pp vs world | 58.9% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +31.3 pp vs world | 12.2% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 130.0% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +73.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 76.1% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +45.2 pp vs world | 62.4% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +32.2 pp vs world | 13.8% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 138.5% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +77.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 73.3% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +44.3 pp vs world | 62.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +33.7 pp vs world | 11.3% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 135.3% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +77.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 72.2% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +43.2 pp vs world | 61.9% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +33.8 pp vs world | 10.2% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 134.1% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +77.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
Europe88.4%2024
Western Europe97.2%2024
World57.1%2024
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 45.3%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
1970–1990-0.3 pp1990–2010-1.9 pp2010–2024+0.0 pp
World specialization: 0.04×
1970–1990-3.6 pp1990–2010+17.8 pp2010–2024-3.5 pp
World specialization: 1.77×
1970–1990+0.6 pp1990–2010-4.7 pp2010–2024+0.2 pp
World specialization: 0.68×
1970–1990-0.4 pp1990–2010-11.5 pp2010–2024+2.1 pp
World specialization: 0.58×
1970–1990-0.7 pp1990–2010-5.1 pp2010–2024+1.5 pp
World specialization: 0.50×
1970–1990+4.3 pp1990–2010+5.4 pp2010–2024-0.3 pp
World specialization: 1.02×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
35.9% → 40.2%
Percentage-point change: +4.3 pp40.2% → 45.7%
Percentage-point change: +5.4 pp45.7% → 45.3%
Percentage-point change: -0.3 ppHow to read specialization
World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Agriculture, forestry and fishing0.04×
Mining, manufacturing and utilities1.77×
Construction0.68×
Trade, restaurants and hotels0.58×
Transport, storage and communication0.50×
Other activities1.02×
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | 2.4% | 160 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 26.7% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 7.8% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 18.2% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 9.1% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 35.9% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 2.4% | 158 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 26.7% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 7.8% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 18.2% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 9.1% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 35.9% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 2.4% | 159 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 26.7% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 7.8% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 9.1% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 35.9% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 2.4% | 159 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 26.6% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 7.8% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 9.1% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 35.9% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 2.4% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 26.7% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 7.8% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 18.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 9.1% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 35.9% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 2.4% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 26.7% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 7.8% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 9.1% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 35.9% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 2.4% | 156 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 26.6% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 7.8% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 36.0% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 2.4% | 156 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 11.4 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 26.7% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 7.8% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 35.8% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 2.4% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 26.7% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 7.8% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 35.9% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 2.3% | 157 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 10.9 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 26.4% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 7.8% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 36.3% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 2.4% | 154 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 27.2% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 7.8% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 18.1% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 35.4% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 2.3% | 155 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 26.4% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 7.8% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 18.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 36.0% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | 2.3% | 155 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 25.5% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 7.7% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 18.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 9.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 37.4% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 2.3% | 155 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 25.1% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 7.6% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 18.1% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 9.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 37.8% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 2.5% | 153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 24.4% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 7.8% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 18.1% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 9.1% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 38.1% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 2.3% | 154 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 24.6% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 7.9% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 18.1% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 9.1% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 38.0% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 2.2% | 155 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 24.7% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 7.9% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 17.8% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 9.0% | 63 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 38.5% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 2.2% | 154 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 24.6% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 8.1% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 17.7% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 8.8% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 38.6% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 2.2% | 153 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 23.6% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 8.4% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 17.7% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 8.9% | 68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 39.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 2.2% | 154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 23.0% | 91 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 8.7% | 24 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 17.5% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 9.0% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 39.6% | 42 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | 2.0% | 182 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 23.1% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 8.4% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 17.8% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 8.5% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 40.2% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 1.9% | 184 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 9.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 22.9% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 8.0% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 16.7% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 8.8% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 41.8% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 1.7% | 184 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 9.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 22.7% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 7.4% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 16.6% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 8.9% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 42.7% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 1.6% | 184 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 9.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 22.7% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 7.0% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 16.1% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 8.9% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 43.8% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 1.5% | 185 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 9.4 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 23.4% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 7.1% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 15.9% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 8.6% | 81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 43.4% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 1.4% | 186 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 8.9 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 23.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 6.8% | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 16.2% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 8.7% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 43.7% | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 1.3% | 186 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 8.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 22.8% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 6.2% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 16.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 8.8% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 45.1% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 1.3% | 187 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 8.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 22.8% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 5.4% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 16.3% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 8.3% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 45.9% | 32 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 41.2% | 9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +18.1 pp vs world | 4.0% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.1% | 204 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 3.5% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 45.9% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 41.1% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 3.9% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.2% | 201 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 3.4% | 202 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 1.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 46.2% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 0.2% | 199 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 40.1% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world | 3.9% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.3% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 3.4% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 47.2% | 27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 41.4% | 13 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 3.9% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.3% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 3.5% | 201 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 45.8% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 42.1% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 4.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 5.4% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 3.6% | 198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 44.7% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 41.5% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 4.0% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 5.4% | 198 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 3.5% | 197 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 45.4% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 0.2% | 200 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 2.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 41.5% | 17 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 3.9% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.5% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 3.5% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 45.4% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 0.1% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 41.8% | 20 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.8 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 3.9% | 159 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 5.6% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 3.5% | 198 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 45.1% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 0.1% | 200 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 42.3% | 21 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 3.7% | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 5.7% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 3.3% | 198 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 44.9% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 0.1% | 199 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 42.3% | 18 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world | 3.5% | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 5.7% | 203 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 3.2% | 203 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 45.2% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | 0.1% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 42.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 3.5% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 5.9% | 200 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 4.3 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 44.4% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 40.6% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 3.7% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 6.0% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 3.3% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 46.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 40.8% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 3.7% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 6.3% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 3.4% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 45.7% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 41.1% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 3.8% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 5.9% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 3.3% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 45.7% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 40.3% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 3.8% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 5.9% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 3.4% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 46.5% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 40.2% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 3.8% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 5.8% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 3.3% | 201 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 46.7% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 0.1% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 39.8% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 3.9% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 5.8% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 3.4% | 204 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 47.0% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 39.1% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 4.0% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 5.7% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 3.5% | 206 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 47.6% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 39.5% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 3.9% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 5.6% | 207 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 3.5% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 47.4% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 41.7% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 4.3% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 7.4% | 203 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 3.1% | 205 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 43.4% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 39.4% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world | 4.1% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 9.3% | 196 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 3.6% | 202 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 43.4% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 0.1% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 41.6% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 4.3% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 5.8% | 205 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 3.5% | 203 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.3 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 44.7% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | 0.2% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 37.2% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 4.5% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 8.1% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 3.7% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 46.2% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 0.2% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 38.8% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 3.6% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 7.2% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 4.0% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 46.2% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 0.2% | 203 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 36.9% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world | 4.0% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 10.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 5.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 43.9% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 0.2% | 202 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 36.3% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 4.2% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 7.8% | 198 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 5.7 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 5.7% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 46.0% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 0.2% | 203 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 37.3% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 3.9% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 4.9% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 45.3% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 36.2% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Liechtenstein was 20.6 percentage points above the world value.
- Latest share
- 36.2%
- World specialization
- 2.31×
- Latest year
- 2024
23.2% → 20.3%
Percentage-point change: -2.8 pp20.3% → 39.2%
Percentage-point change: +18.9 pp39.2% → 36.2%
Percentage-point change: -3.0 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Liechtenstein | 1970 | 23.2% | 35 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 86.9% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 124 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1971 | 23.2% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 86.9% | 60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 141 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1972 | 23.2% | 31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 86.9% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 141 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 20.0 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 123 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1973 | 23.1% | 31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 86.9% | 59 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 66.9 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 1.6% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 122 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1974 | 23.2% | 33 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 86.9% | 62 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 1.8% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1975 | 23.2% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 86.9% | 59 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 66.9 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 1.7% | 86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1976 | 23.1% | 33 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 86.9% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 4.4% | 108 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1977 | 23.2% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 86.9% | 56 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 5.4% | 76 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 117 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1978 | 23.2% | 29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 86.9% | 56 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 4.4% | 99 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 114 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1979 | 22.9% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 86.8% | 56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 3.5% | 112 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 36.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1980 | 23.7% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 87.0% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1981 | 22.9% | 30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 86.7% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 1.3% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1982 | 22.1% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 86.7% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | -5.1% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1983 | 21.7% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 86.6% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | -1.1% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1984 | 21.2% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 86.7% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 1.7% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1985 | 21.3% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 86.4% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 7.5% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1986 | 21.4% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 86.7% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 4.7% | 74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1987 | 21.4% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 86.9% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 9.1% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1988 | 20.5% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 86.7% | 47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 1.4% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1989 | 20.1% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 87.4% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 6.2% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1990 | 20.3% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 88.0% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | -1.5% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1991 | 20.0% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 87.4% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 3.6% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1992 | 19.7% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 86.7% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | -0.4% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1993 | 19.5% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 86.1% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | -0.3% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1994 | 20.0% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 85.3% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 4.3% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1995 | 19.6% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 84.3% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 1.4% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1996 | 19.4% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 85.1% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 1.9% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1997 | 19.4% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 85.4% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 9.3% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1998 | 38.9% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world | 94.4% | 9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 128.3% | 1 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 | +126.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 1999 | 38.8% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world | 94.4% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | -0.2% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2000 | 37.9% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +20.5 pp vs world | 94.5% | 12 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.6 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2001 | 39.2% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 94.7% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 5.7% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2002 | 40.2% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 95.4% | 9 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +23.3 pp vs world | 1.3% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2003 | 39.7% | 2 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 95.7% | 5 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 98.0 / 100 | +24.2 pp vs world | -0.5% | 160 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 96 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2004 | 39.9% | 2 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 96.0% | 6 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world | 2.0% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -17.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2005 | 40.2% | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.2 pp vs world | 96.1% | 4 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | 4.3% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2006 | 40.6% | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 96.1% | 5 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 7.1% | 82 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 102 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2007 | 40.7% | 2 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.6 pp vs world | 96.3% | 6 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 6.8% | 71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2008 | 41.3% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +24.4 pp vs world | 96.3% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +26.4 pp vs world | 2.2% | 104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2009 | 39.0% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | 95.9% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +23.2 pp vs world | -8.2% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2010 | 39.2% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | 96.1% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +25.3 pp vs world | 3.0% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2011 | 39.6% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +22.7 pp vs world | 96.3% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | 3.5% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2012 | 38.8% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 96.2% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | -0.5% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2013 | 38.7% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +22.1 pp vs world | 96.2% | 5 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +26.2 pp vs world | 2.4% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2014 | 38.4% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | 96.5% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +24.7 pp vs world | 0.7% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2015 | 37.6% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 96.0% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | -0.9% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2016 | 38.1% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world | 96.6% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 3.6% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2017 | 40.4% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.7 pp vs world | 96.9% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | 8.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2018 | 38.0% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world | 96.7% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world | -4.8% | 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 4.8 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2019 | 40.2% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 96.7% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.1 pp vs world | 6.6% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2020 | 35.5% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world | 95.6% | 5 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | -12.2% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2021 | 37.4% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 96.4% | 3 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.0 / 100 | +21.0 pp vs world | 5.3% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2022 | 36.0% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 97.5% | 5 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world | -1.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2023 | 35.3% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 97.4% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Liechtenstein | 2024 | 36.2% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +20.6 pp vs world | 97.1% | 4 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 98.6 / 100 | +23.0 pp vs world | 3.2% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Interpretation note
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization
Europe2.49×
Western Europe2.35×
World2.31×