Three fixed historical periods

Read the economy through three eras

Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.

Formation1970–1990

Integration1990–2010

Current era2010–2024

01 · Economic overview

What should a reader know first?

Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.

Nominal GDP$124.68B2024 · Latest current-price total · World rank 65 of 210

Real GDP growth-2.0%2024 · Latest constant-price annual change · Constant-price annual change

GDP per capita$6,8752024 · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted · Current U.S. dollars; not PPP adjusted

Share of world GDP0.1%2024 · Share of the official world total · Official world aggregate denominator

Largest broad activity36.8%2024 · Largest broad production activity · Other activities

Manufacturing13.8%2024 · Share of total gross value added · World gap −1.8 pp

Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows

Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic overview annual rank and index table

Ecuador	1970	$2.80B	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	$455	91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.2 / 100	49.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	$2.69B	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.1%	102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$424	102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	42.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	$3.09B	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	9.0%	38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.1 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	$473	104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	41.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	$3.90B	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	7.9%	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	$580	105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	43.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	$6.47B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	12.4%	18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+10.3 pp vs world	$935	83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	62.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	$7.71B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	12.7%	10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+11.9 pp vs world	$1,083	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	65.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	$9.04B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.2%	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	$1,235	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	70.7 (world = 100)	0.1%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	$11.06B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.9%	125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	$1,469	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	76.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	$11.81B	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	5.1%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	$1,526	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	67.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	$14.36B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.1%	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	$1,807	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	71.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	$18.25B	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.1%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	$2,235	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	80.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	$22.12B	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	0.2 (world = 100)	9.8%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	$2,637	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	94.1 (world = 100)	0.2%	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	-99.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	$20.06B	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.2 (world = 100)	1.7%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	$2,329	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	85.4 (world = 100)	0.2%	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	$17.26B	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.7%	112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	$1,952	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	71.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	$16.94B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.9%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	$1,867	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	67.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	$17.30B	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.8%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	$1,858	77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	66.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	$14.98B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.4%	89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	$1,569	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	49.5 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	$13.42B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.8%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	$1,372	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	39.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	$12.25B	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.0%	115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	$1,224	105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	31.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	$13.25B	62 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.9%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	$1,293	104 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	32.5 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	$14.95B	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.5%	41 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	77.5 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	$1,427	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	32.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	$16.44B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.3%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	$1,536	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	34.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	$17.39B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.7%	111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	$1,591	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	33.7 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	$18.33B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.6%	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	$1,644	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	34.7 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	$22.12B	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.9%	97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$1,945	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	39.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	$23.90B	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.9%	153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.9 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	$2,062	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	37.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	$24.80B	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.9%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	$2,099	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	38.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	$27.55B	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.5%	150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	$2,290	105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	42.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	$27.19B	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	3.4%	121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$2,220	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	42.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	$19.02B	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	-4.4%	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	$1,525	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	28.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	$17.53B	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	5.0%	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	$1,382	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	25.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	$23.13B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.2%	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	$1,791	113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	33.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	$27.05B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.9%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	$2,059	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	37.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	$30.97B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.9%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$2,316	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100	37.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	$35.19B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.8%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	$2,586	111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	38.0 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	$40.28B	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	5.4%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	$2,909	114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	39.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	$45.69B	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.3%	139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	$3,244	114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	41.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	$49.85B	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.9%	178 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	14.5 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	$3,479	122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	40.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	$61.14B	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.6%	55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	$4,195	121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	44.6 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	$60.09B	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.1%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	$4,053	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	45.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	$68.15B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.0%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	$4,520	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	47.4 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	$78.99B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	8.5%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	$5,154	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	49.2 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	$87.74B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	5.8%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	$5,634	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	53.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	$96.57B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	7.2%	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	$6,109	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	56.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	$102.72B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	4.2%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	$6,406	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	58.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	$97.21B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	$5,976	107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	58.7 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	$97.67B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	-0.7%	187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	11.0 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	$5,918	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	57.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	$104.47B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	6.0%	32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.2 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	$6,233	107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	57.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	$107.48B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	1.0%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	$6,304	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	55.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	$107.60B	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.2%	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	$6,205	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	54.7 (world = 100)	0.1%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	$95.87B	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	-9.2%	169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	$5,464	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	49.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	$107.18B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	9.4%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	$6,061	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	48.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	$116.13B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	5.9%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	$6,516	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	50.9 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	$121.15B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	2.0%	138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	$6,738	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	50.8 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	$124.68B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	-2.0%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	$6,875	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	50.3 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

The long view

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · U.S. dollars · index, shared start = 100

02 · Economic size and world position

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Full historical record

Nominal GDP

Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars

Formation1970–1990

$2.80B → $14.95B

Compound annual change: +8.7% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$14.95B → $68.15B

Compound annual change: +7.9% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$68.15B → $124.68B

Compound annual change: +4.4% CAGR

Nominal GDP$124.68B2024 · Published series · World rank 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP$111.00B2024 · Published series · World rank 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world GDP0.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Economic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	$2.80B	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$14.30B	65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	$2.69B	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$14.88B	65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	$3.09B	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$16.23B	63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.0 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	$3.90B	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$17.51B	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	$6.47B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$19.68B	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	$7.71B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$22.18B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	$9.04B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$23.55B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	$11.06B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$23.99B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	$11.81B	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$25.23B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	$14.36B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$26.27B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	$18.25B	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$27.09B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	70.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	$22.12B	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	0.2 (world = 100)	$29.73B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.2%	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	-99.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	$20.06B	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.2 (world = 100)	$30.23B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.2%	52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	$17.26B	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$30.44B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	$16.94B	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$31.33B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	$17.30B	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$32.83B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	69.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	$14.98B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$33.97B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	$13.42B	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$35.25B	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	$12.25B	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$36.30B	59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	$13.25B	62 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$37.36B	59 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	67.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	$14.95B	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$39.79B	65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	$16.44B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$41.51B	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	$17.39B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$42.20B	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	$18.33B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$43.28B	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	$22.12B	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$44.95B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	$23.90B	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$45.83B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	$24.80B	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$48.10B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	$27.55B	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$49.29B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	$27.19B	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$50.96B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	$19.02B	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$48.73B	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	$17.53B	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$51.18B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	$23.13B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$53.33B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	$27.05B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$55.96B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	$30.97B	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$57.57B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	$35.19B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$61.51B	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	$40.28B	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$64.83B	64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	$45.69B	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$67.64B	64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	$49.85B	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$68.93B	64 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.6 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	$61.14B	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$73.45B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	$60.09B	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$74.25B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	$68.15B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$77.24B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	$78.99B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$83.80B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	$87.74B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$88.64B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	$96.57B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$95.03B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	$102.72B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$99.05B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	$97.21B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$99.17B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	$97.67B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$98.49B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	$104.47B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$104.37B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	$107.48B	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$105.46B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	$107.60B	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$105.63B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	$95.87B	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$95.87B	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	$107.18B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$104.90B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	$116.13B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$111.05B	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	$121.15B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$113.26B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	$124.68B	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	$111.00B	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	0.1 (world = 100)	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.

Latest common comparison

South America$4.34T2024

World$111.57T2024

03 · Output and income per person

What does the record show per person?

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Full historical record

GDP per person

Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · U.S. dollars per person

Formation1970–1990

$455 → $1,427

Compound annual change: +5.9% CAGR

Integration1990–2010

$1,427 → $4,520

Compound annual change: +5.9% CAGR

Current era2010–2024

$4,520 → $6,875

Compound annual change: +3.0% CAGR

GDP per person$6,8752024 · Published series · World rank 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP per person$6,1202024 · Published series · World rank 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Output and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	$455	91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.2 / 100	49.0 (world = 100)	$2,324	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	44.8 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1971	$424	102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	42.4 (world = 100)	$2,348	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	44.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1972	$473	104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	41.9 (world = 100)	$2,486	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	45.4 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1973	$580	105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	43.0 (world = 100)	$2,604	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	45.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1974	$935	83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	62.4 (world = 100)	$2,844	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	49.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1975	$1,083	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	65.8 (world = 100)	$3,116	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	55.0 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1976	$1,235	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	70.7 (world = 100)	$3,217	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	54.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1977	$1,469	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	76.0 (world = 100)	$3,188	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	53.2 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1978	$1,526	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	67.8 (world = 100)	$3,261	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	53.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1979	$1,807	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	71.0 (world = 100)	$3,304	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	52.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1980	$2,235	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	80.1 (world = 100)	$3,317	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	52.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1981	$2,637	66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.3 / 100	94.1 (world = 100)	$3,545	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	56.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1982	$2,329	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	85.4 (world = 100)	$3,510	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	56.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1983	$1,952	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	71.0 (world = 100)	$3,443	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	54.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1984	$1,867	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	67.2 (world = 100)	$3,452	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	53.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1985	$1,858	77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	66.4 (world = 100)	$3,526	85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	53.8 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1986	$1,569	90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.7 / 100	49.5 (world = 100)	$3,558	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	53.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1987	$1,372	98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	39.0 (world = 100)	$3,605	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	53.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1988	$1,224	105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	31.6 (world = 100)	$3,627	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	52.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1989	$1,293	104 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	32.5 (world = 100)	$3,648	89 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	50.6 / 100	51.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1990	$1,427	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	32.9 (world = 100)	$3,799	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	53.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1991	$1,536	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	34.3 (world = 100)	$3,879	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	54.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1992	$1,591	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	33.7 (world = 100)	$3,861	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	54.0 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1993	$1,644	112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	34.7 (world = 100)	$3,880	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	54.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1994	$1,945	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	39.1 (world = 100)	$3,953	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	54.2 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1995	$2,062	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	37.9 (world = 100)	$3,954	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	53.4 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1996	$2,099	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	38.3 (world = 100)	$4,072	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	53.8 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1997	$2,290	105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	42.6 (world = 100)	$4,097	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	52.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1998	$2,220	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	42.1 (world = 100)	$4,160	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	52.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	1999	$1,525	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	28.2 (world = 100)	$3,908	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	48.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2000	$1,382	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	25.2 (world = 100)	$4,033	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	48.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2001	$1,791	113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	33.3 (world = 100)	$4,131	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	49.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2002	$2,059	109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	37.2 (world = 100)	$4,259	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	50.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2003	$2,316	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100	37.8 (world = 100)	$4,305	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	50.4 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2004	$2,586	111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	38.0 (world = 100)	$4,520	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	51.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2005	$2,909	114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	39.9 (world = 100)	$4,682	106 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	51.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2006	$3,244	114 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	41.6 (world = 100)	$4,802	105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	51.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2007	$3,479	122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	40.1 (world = 100)	$4,810	107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	50.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2008	$4,195	121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	44.6 (world = 100)	$5,039	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2009	$4,053	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	45.9 (world = 100)	$5,008	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	53.2 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2010	$4,520	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	47.4 (world = 100)	$5,123	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	52.7 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2011	$5,154	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	49.2 (world = 100)	$5,467	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	55.2 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2012	$5,634	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	53.3 (world = 100)	$5,692	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	56.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2013	$6,109	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	56.8 (world = 100)	$6,012	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	58.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2014	$6,406	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	58.8 (world = 100)	$6,177	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	59.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2015	$5,976	107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	58.7 (world = 100)	$6,097	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	57.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2016	$5,918	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	57.8 (world = 100)	$5,967	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	55.5 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2017	$6,233	107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	57.9 (world = 100)	$6,227	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	56.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2018	$6,304	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	55.8 (world = 100)	$6,185	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	55.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2019	$6,205	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	54.7 (world = 100)	$6,092	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	53.4 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2020	$5,464	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	49.9 (world = 100)	$5,464	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	49.9 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2021	$6,061	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	48.8 (world = 100)	$5,932	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	51.3 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2022	$6,516	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	50.9 (world = 100)	$6,231	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	52.6 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2023	$6,738	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	50.8 (world = 100)	$6,299	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	52.1 (world = 100)
Ecuador	2024	$6,875	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	50.3 (world = 100)	$6,120	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	49.7 (world = 100)

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.

Latest common comparison

South America$9,9682024

World$13,6732024

04 · Real growth and output prices

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Full historical record

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldConstant prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

4.1% → 6.5%

Average annual rate: +5.3%

Integration1990–2010

6.5% → 4.0%

Average annual rate: +3.5%

Current era2010–2024

4.0% → -2.0%

Average annual rate: +2.8%

Real GDP growth-2.0%2024 · Published series · World rank 200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real GDP-per-person growth-2.8%2024 · Published series · World rank 197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Implicit GDP deflator112.32024 · Published series · World rank 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	19.6	14 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	92.7 / 100
Ecuador	1971	4.1%	102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.9 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	1.0%	119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	18.1	20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	89.3 / 100
Ecuador	1972	9.0%	38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.1 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	5.9%	45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	19.0	21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	88.7 / 100
Ecuador	1973	7.9%	49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	72.9 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	4.8%	67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	22.3	18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100
Ecuador	1974	12.4%	18 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100	+10.3 pp vs world	9.2%	19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	89.8 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	32.9	10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100
Ecuador	1975	12.7%	10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+11.9 pp vs world	9.6%	11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world	34.7	12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.8 / 100
Ecuador	1976	6.2%	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	3.2%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	38.4	10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100
Ecuador	1977	1.9%	125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	-0.9%	130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	27.1 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	46.1	6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100
Ecuador	1978	5.1%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	2.3%	114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	36.2 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	46.8	6 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	97.2 / 100
Ecuador	1979	4.1%	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	1.3%	117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	54.7	5 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	97.7 / 100
Ecuador	1980	3.1%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	0.4%	104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	67.4	4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	98.3 / 100
Ecuador	1981	9.8%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	6.9%	17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	74.4	4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	98.3 / 100
Ecuador	1982	1.7%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	-1.0%	101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	43.5 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	66.4	4 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	98.3 / 100
Ecuador	1983	0.7%	112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	-1.9%	119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	56.7	10 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100
Ecuador	1984	2.9%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	0.3%	115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	54.1	13 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	93.2 / 100
Ecuador	1985	4.8%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	2.1%	85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	52.7	16 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100
Ecuador	1986	3.4%	89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	0.9%	107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.1 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	44.1	42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.8 / 100
Ecuador	1987	3.8%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	1.3%	91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	49.2 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	38.1	68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100
Ecuador	1988	3.0%	115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	0.6%	121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	33.7	80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100
Ecuador	1989	2.9%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	0.6%	116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	35.0 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	35.5	80 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100
Ecuador	1990	6.5%	41 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	77.5 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	4.2%	44 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	75.8 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	37.6	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100
Ecuador	1991	4.3%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	2.1%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	39.6	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100
Ecuador	1992	1.7%	111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	-0.5%	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	41.2	81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100
Ecuador	1993	2.6%	101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	0.5%	107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	42.4	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100
Ecuador	1994	3.9%	97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	53.2 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	1.9%	106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	49.2	73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.9 / 100
Ecuador	1995	1.9%	153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.9 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	0.0%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	52.1	74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	64.4 / 100
Ecuador	1996	4.9%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	3.0%	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	51.6	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100
Ecuador	1997	2.5%	150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	0.6%	153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.9 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	55.9	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100
Ecuador	1998	3.4%	121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	1.5%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	53.4	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100
Ecuador	1999	-4.4%	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	-6.1%	195 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	5.4 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world	39.0	121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100
Ecuador	2000	5.0%	76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	63.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	3.2%	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	34.3	140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100
Ecuador	2001	4.2%	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	2.4%	80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	43.4	125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100
Ecuador	2002	4.9%	60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	71.2 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	3.1%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	48.3	116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.9 / 100
Ecuador	2003	2.9%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	1.1%	139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	53.8	111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.3 / 100
Ecuador	2004	6.8%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	5.0%	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	57.2	110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	46.8 / 100
Ecuador	2005	5.4%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	3.6%	92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	62.1	110 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100
Ecuador	2006	4.3%	139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	2.6%	134 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	35.7 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	67.6	105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100
Ecuador	2007	1.9%	178 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	14.5 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	0.2%	183 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	12.1 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	72.3	98 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100
Ecuador	2008	6.6%	55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	4.8%	58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	83.2	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100
Ecuador	2009	1.1%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	-0.6%	91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	80.9	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100
Ecuador	2010	4.0%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	2.3%	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	88.2	50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	76.6 / 100
Ecuador	2011	8.5%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	6.7%	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	94.3	25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.5 / 100
Ecuador	2012	5.8%	54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	4.1%	53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	99.0	24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.0 / 100
Ecuador	2013	7.2%	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	5.6%	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	101.6	21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100
Ecuador	2014	4.2%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	2.7%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	103.7	19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	91.4 / 100
Ecuador	2015	0.1%	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	-1.3%	180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	98.0	27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	87.6 / 100
Ecuador	2016	-0.7%	187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	11.0 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	-2.1%	185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.0 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	99.2	21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	90.4 / 100
Ecuador	2017	6.0%	32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.2 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	4.4%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	100.1	26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	88.0 / 100
Ecuador	2018	1.0%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	-0.7%	183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.9 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	101.9	33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100
Ecuador	2019	0.2%	181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.9 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	-1.5%	190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	9.6 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	101.9	34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100
Ecuador	2020	-9.2%	169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	-10.3%	167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	20.6 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	100.0	1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	100.0 / 100
Ecuador	2021	9.4%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	8.6%	41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.9 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	102.2	162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.0 / 100
Ecuador	2022	5.9%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	5.0%	59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	104.6	183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.9 / 100
Ecuador	2023	2.0%	138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	1.1%	133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	36.8 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	107.0	188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	10.5 / 100
Ecuador	2024	-2.0%	200 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	4.8 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	-2.8%	197 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	6.2 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	112.3	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.

Latest common comparison

South America2.6%2024

World2.8%2024

05 · Consumption and domestic demand

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Full historical record

Final Consumption

Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

85.7% → 75.3%

Percentage-point change: -10.4 pp

Integration1990–2010

75.3% → 78.2%

Percentage-point change: +2.9 pp

Current era2010–2024

78.2% → 78.2%

Percentage-point change: -0.1 pp

Final consumption78.2%2024 · Published series · World rank 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Household consumption64.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Government consumption13.3%2024 · Published series · World rank 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Domestic demand96.6%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Consumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	85.7%	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	+13.0 pp vs world	75.5%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	+18.5 pp vs world	10.2%	136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.3 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	102.3%	98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	85.8%	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	+12.8 pp vs world	76.8%	44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+19.8 pp vs world	9.0%	150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	104.8%	80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	81.8%	85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	72.1%	61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+15.3 pp vs world	9.7%	145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world	101.4%	100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	79.8%	87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	68.4%	74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	+12.5 pp vs world	11.3%	127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	96.0%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	71.4%	124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	30.5 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	54.9%	123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	16.4%	70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	92.6%	148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	16.5 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	84.0%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	+10.3 pp vs world	62.2%	101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.2 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	21.8%	37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	79.5 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	100.9%	120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	82.2%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	61.2%	101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.2 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	21.0%	41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	77.3 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	99.6%	132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	78.8%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	57.0%	122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	21.8%	39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	78.4 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	99.4%	131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.1 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	79.3%	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	58.5%	113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.4 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	20.8%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	+4.3 pp vs world	101.8%	114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	35.8 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	78.7%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	59.1%	111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	19.6%	62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.3 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	97.5%	143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.3 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	76.6%	120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.8 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	57.5%	123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	19.1%	65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	98.1%	143 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.3 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	76.4%	125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.9 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	59.7%	113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.4 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	16.6%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	98.5%	150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.3 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	83.1%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	+8.4 pp vs world	64.9%	87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.1 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	18.2%	84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	52.8 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	101.0%	121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	79.9%	105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	41.2 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	63.9%	97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	16.0%	100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	97.4%	142 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	19.9 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	80.1%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	63.3%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	16.8%	90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	49.4 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	95.6%	146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	77.7%	109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	62.5%	95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	15.2%	102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	93.2%	149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.9 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	79.7%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	63.4%	88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	50.6 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	16.3%	94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.2 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	99.5%	110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.1 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	83.6%	79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.9 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	67.5%	75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	16.1%	90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	49.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	105.0%	71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	60.2 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	79.9%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	62.9%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	17.0%	78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	56.3 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	101.9%	95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	78.6%	99 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	64.4%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world	14.3%	101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	43.5 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	101.6%	97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	75.3%	136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	62.6%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	12.7%	139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	95.6%	166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	76.0%	144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	30.2 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	64.3%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	11.7%	151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.5 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	94.2%	171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-6.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	73.9%	156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	63.6%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	10.2%	167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	18.6 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	92.8%	180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	12.3 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	82.7%	103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.2 / 100	+7.2 pp vs world	71.7%	71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+12.9 pp vs world	11.0%	159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-5.7 pp vs world	100.2%	131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	36.3 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	82.6%	91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	56.1 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	71.2%	72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.2 / 100	+12.2 pp vs world	11.4%	149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.5 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	100.2%	127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	38.2 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	83.9%	85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	59.0 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	72.3%	60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.1 / 100	+13.8 pp vs world	11.6%	150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.0 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	100.2%	134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	34.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	81.2%	106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	70.0%	80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.3 / 100	+11.2 pp vs world	11.2%	155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	24.5 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	96.3%	157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	23.5 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	81.9%	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	70.3%	78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	+11.2 pp vs world	11.6%	151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.5 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	98.7%	149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.5 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	84.9%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	73.3%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+13.8 pp vs world	11.6%	157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	23.5 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	105.2%	102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	76.4%	139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	64.3%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	12.0%	154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	92.4%	175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	14.7 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	73.1%	149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	63.6%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	9.5%	179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	12.7 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	90.3%	170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-9.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	82.4%	100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	72.6%	64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	+12.5 pp vs world	9.8%	178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	13.2 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	100.9%	123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	83.7%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	73.5%	64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	+13.3 pp vs world	10.3%	173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	15.7 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	103.4%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	82.9%	98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	71.8%	71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+12.0 pp vs world	11.1%	165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	98.7%	137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	81.6%	102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	70.4%	74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.2 / 100	+11.3 pp vs world	11.2%	159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	97.9%	145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	79.2%	112 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	68.2%	86 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	58.7 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	11.0%	164 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	96.7%	148 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	28.6 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	76.3%	122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	41.5 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	65.4%	92 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	55.8 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	10.9%	159 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	23.3 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	94.4%	155 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	25.2 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	75.6%	127 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	39.1 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	64.4%	95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	11.2%	154 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	25.7 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	93.9%	159 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	23.3 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	72.5%	144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	60.5%	121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.3 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	12.0%	143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.7 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	94.0%	166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	20.7 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	77.6%	130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.3 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	63.2%	108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	14.4%	125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.4 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	98.7%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	78.2%	123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.6 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	64.6%	98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	13.7%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	101.7%	120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.8 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	74.7%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	61.6%	118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	13.1%	142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	98.2%	143 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.7 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	74.2%	144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	60.4%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	13.7%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	97.2%	153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.9 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	73.2%	153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	59.0%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	14.2%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	98.1%	145 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.8 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	73.2%	152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	58.4%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	14.7%	125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	97.9%	148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	78.1%	124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	62.7%	111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.1 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	15.4%	123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	100.8%	131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	77.0%	129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.8 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	61.3%	118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	43.8 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	15.7%	113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.2 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	97.3%	157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	75.1%	138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.4 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	59.8%	123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	15.3%	116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	44.7 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	97.6%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	78.4%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	62.8%	112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	15.6%	110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.6 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	100.9%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	78.9%	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	63.8%	104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	50.5 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	15.2%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	100.0%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	79.8%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	63.5%	103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	16.3%	123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	97.4%	154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.4 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	78.4%	117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.5 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	63.9%	100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	14.4%	137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	99.1%	134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	77.6%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	64.1%	103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+8.5 pp vs world	13.5%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	100.0%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	79.2%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	65.6%	96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	54.3 / 100	+9.2 pp vs world	13.6%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	99.9%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	78.2%	116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.0 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	64.9%	98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	53.4 / 100	+8.2 pp vs world	13.3%	142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	96.6%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.

Latest common comparison

South America82.0%2024

World73.2%2024

06 · Investment and capital formation

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Full historical record

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · national currency · percent

Formation1970–1990

16.6% → 20.2%

Percentage-point change: +3.7 pp

Integration1990–2010

20.2% → 23.5%

Percentage-point change: +3.3 pp

Current era2010–2024

23.5% → 18.5%

Percentage-point change: -5.0 pp

Gross capital formation18.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Gross fixed capital formation18.4%2024 · Published series · World rank 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest

Changes in inventories0.1%2024 · Published series · World rank 108 of 163 · highest-to-lowest

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Investment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	16.6%	121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.8 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world	12.8%	140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.0 / 100	-10.1 pp vs world	3.7%	34 of 137 · highest-to-lowest	75.7 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	19.0%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	15.2%	130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.7 / 100	-7.9 pp vs world	3.7%	27 of 137 · highest-to-lowest	80.9 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	19.6%	114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	35.8 / 100	-7.8 pp vs world	16.3%	125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	3.3%	29 of 138 · highest-to-lowest	79.6 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	16.2%	135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-12.4 pp vs world	19.1%	109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.6 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	-2.9%	127 of 140 · highest-to-lowest	9.4 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	21.2%	112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.9 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	11.6%	154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	13.1 / 100	-14.8 pp vs world	9.6%	7 of 138 · highest-to-lowest	95.6 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	16.9%	138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.2 / 100	-9.9 pp vs world	14.9%	141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	-11.4 pp vs world	2.0%	54 of 140 · highest-to-lowest	61.9 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	17.4%	135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-10.7 pp vs world	15.3%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-11.6 pp vs world	2.1%	46 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	67.4 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	20.6%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world	16.0%	137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.7 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world	4.6%	23 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	84.1 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	22.5%	109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.6 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	17.9%	132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	-9.7 pp vs world	4.6%	20 of 139 · highest-to-lowest	86.2 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	18.8%	133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-9.5 pp vs world	16.3%	146 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	2.6%	40 of 142 · highest-to-lowest	72.3 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	21.6%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	15.2%	148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	16.5 / 100	-11.9 pp vs world	6.4%	11 of 143 · highest-to-lowest	93.0 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	22.1%	111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	15.5%	149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	15.9 / 100	-11.3 pp vs world	6.6%	9 of 144 · highest-to-lowest	94.4 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	17.9%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	16.4%	144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.8 / 100	-9.7 pp vs world	1.5%	54 of 145 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	17.5%	131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.1 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	12.6%	155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	12.5 / 100	-13.1 pp vs world	4.9%	13 of 146 · highest-to-lowest	91.7 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	15.5%	137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.7 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world	12.8%	153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	13.6 / 100	-12.5 pp vs world	2.7%	31 of 147 · highest-to-lowest	79.5 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	15.5%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-10.2 pp vs world	13.4%	144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	18.8 / 100	-11.4 pp vs world	2.1%	38 of 148 · highest-to-lowest	74.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	19.8%	107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.8 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	15.6%	135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-9.2 pp vs world	4.2%	16 of 148 · highest-to-lowest	89.8 / 100	+3.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	21.4%	99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.3 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	17.8%	119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.0 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	3.6%	18 of 151 · highest-to-lowest	88.7 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	22.1%	93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.7 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	16.7%	129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world	5.4%	10 of 151 · highest-to-lowest	94.0 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	23.0%	95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	16.7%	134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-8.4 pp vs world	6.3%	8 of 152 · highest-to-lowest	95.4 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	20.2%	129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	37.3 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	14.7%	173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	15.7 / 100	-10.4 pp vs world	5.6%	22 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	87.9 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	18.2%	141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	31.4 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	14.6%	163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	20.6 / 100	-9.7 pp vs world	3.6%	32 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	18.9%	137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	14.1%	171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	4.9%	28 of 167 · highest-to-lowest	83.7 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	17.4%	145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	14.8%	169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world	2.6%	26 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	85.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	17.7%	152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	26.0 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	14.3%	169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world	3.4%	32 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	81.7 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	16.3%	169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world	13.9%	178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	13.2 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	2.4%	39 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	77.6 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	15.1%	182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	11.3 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world	13.4%	185 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	9.8 / 100	-10.4 pp vs world	1.7%	55 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	68.2 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	16.8%	166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	13.7%	178 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	13.2 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	3.1%	35 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	80.1 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	20.3%	136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	33.8 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	15.3%	173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	15.7 / 100	-8.1 pp vs world	5.0%	13 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	92.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	16.0%	166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.1 / 100	-7.9 pp vs world	13.2%	182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	11.3 / 100	-10.3 pp vs world	2.8%	25 of 168 · highest-to-lowest	85.6 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	17.2%	165 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-7.1 pp vs world	15.0%	168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	18.1 / 100	-8.6 pp vs world	2.2%	38 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	78.1 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	18.5%	154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	25.0 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	15.3%	170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	3.2%	24 of 172 · highest-to-lowest	86.5 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	19.7%	144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	29.9 / 100	-3.3 pp vs world	16.7%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-6.0 pp vs world	2.9%	27 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	85.1 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	15.8%	169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	15.4%	170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	0.3%	114 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	34.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	16.3%	174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	15.2 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world	15.8%	169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world	0.5%	107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.1 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	17.5%	170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	18.0 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	16.3%	173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	16.5 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	1.2%	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	18.1%	168 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	18.9 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	16.6%	174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	16.0 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	1.5%	57 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	68.7 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	18.3%	170 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	18.0 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	16.5%	174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	16.0 / 100	-7.8 pp vs world	1.9%	56 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	21.6%	148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	17.4%	176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	15.9 / 100	-6.9 pp vs world	4.1%	24 of 180 · highest-to-lowest	87.2 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	21.2%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	18.1%	164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	3.0%	17 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	91.0 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	23.5%	100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	19.7%	144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	3.8%	21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	88.7 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	23.5%	102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	20.9%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	2.6%	40 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	78.1 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	23.0%	113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.2 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	22.1%	108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	0.9%	83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	24.9%	84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	60.1 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	23.9%	84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	60.1 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	1.0%	70 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	60.6 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	24.7%	90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	57.2 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	23.5%	90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	57.2 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	1.2%	53 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	22.7%	113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.2 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	22.5%	111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.1 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	0.1%	117 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	33.7 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	20.2%	139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	33.7 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	20.7%	123 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.3 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world	-0.5%	150 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	14.9 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	22.5%	108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	21.5%	115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.2 / 100	-3.7 pp vs world	1.0%	68 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	61.5 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	22.5%	108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	21.0%	122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	41.8 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	1.6%	61 of 175 · highest-to-lowest	65.5 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	21.0%	131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.5 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	20.7%	129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.5 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	0.4%	103 of 174 · highest-to-lowest	41.0 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	17.6%	163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	22.1 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world	18.0%	153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.9 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	-0.4%	136 of 173 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	20.7%	138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-6.3 pp vs world	19.2%	142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world	1.5%	67 of 171 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	22.4%	127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.4 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	20.6%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	1.8%	67 of 170 · highest-to-lowest	60.9 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	20.7%	132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	37.0 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	19.9%	137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	-5.9 pp vs world	0.8%	63 of 169 · highest-to-lowest	63.1 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	18.5%	154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.4 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world	18.4%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	0.1%	108 of 163 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.

Latest common comparison

South America17.4%2024

World26.0%2024

07 · Trade structure and external balance

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Full historical record

Trade openness

Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.

Ecuador is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

EcuadorSouth AmericaWorldCurrent prices · percent

Formation1970–1990

25.1% → 49.5%

Percentage-point change: +24.5 pp

Integration1990–2010

49.5% → 65.8%

Percentage-point change: +16.2 pp

Current era2010–2024

65.8% → 57.2%

Percentage-point change: -8.6 pp

Exports30.3%2024 · Published series · World rank 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Imports26.9%2024 · Published series · World rank 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Net exports3.4%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade openness57.2%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows

Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Trade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices

Ecuador	1970	11.4%	145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	18.6 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	13.7%	156 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	12.4 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	-2.3%	88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	50.8 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	25.1%	152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	14.7 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	12.8%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	17.6%	138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	22.6 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world	-4.8%	103 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	42.4 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	30.5%	144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	15.0%	133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	16.4%	142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.3 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	-1.4%	84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	31.4%	143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.8 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	21.5%	113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	36.7 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world	17.5%	143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.8 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	4.0%	30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.6 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	39.0%	131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	26.6 / 100	+12.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	26.6%	100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	44.1 / 100	+10.5 pp vs world	19.2%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	7.4%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	45.9%	129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	27.7 / 100	+13.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	19.2%	120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.8 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	20.1%	143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.8 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	-0.9%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	39.3%	135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	24.3 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	19.2%	123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	31.1 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	18.7%	145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	18.6 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	0.4%	43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.3 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	37.9%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	19.5%	120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.8 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	18.9%	148 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	16.9 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	0.6%	48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	73.4 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	38.5%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	17.8%	126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	19.5%	144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	-1.8%	70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	61.0 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	37.3%	144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	21.4%	118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	33.9 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	18.9%	150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	2.5%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	40.3%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	20.5%	119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	33.3 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	18.6%	152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	14.7 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	1.9%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	39.1%	142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.3 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	17.6%	127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	16.0%	157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	11.9 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	1.5%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	33.6%	149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	16.4 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	17.6%	126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	18.6%	149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	16.4 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	-1.0%	51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	36.2%	144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	18.5%	121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	15.9%	155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	13.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	2.6%	29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.2 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	34.4%	144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	19.2 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	20.6%	122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	16.2%	154 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	13.6 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	4.4%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	36.8%	141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	20.9 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	23.3%	111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	37.9 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	16.6%	152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	14.7 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	6.8%	25 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	39.9%	138 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	22.6 / 100	+6.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	18.8%	117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	18.3%	139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	0.5%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	37.0%	134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	18.6%	121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	23.6%	126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	-5.0%	110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	38.4 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	42.1%	127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	22.8%	106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	24.7%	126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	-1.9%	83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	53.7 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	47.5%	120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	32.8 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	24.3%	102 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	43.3 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world	25.9%	115 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	36.0 / 100	+8.2 pp vs world	-1.6%	80 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	55.6 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	50.2%	113 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	37.1 / 100	+15.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	27.0%	108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	22.6%	160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.4 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	4.4%	33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.4 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	49.5%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	+11.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	28.0%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	22.2%	162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	5.8%	27 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	87.3 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	50.2%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	+13.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	28.5%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	+8.7 pp vs world	21.3%	164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	20.5 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	7.2%	20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	90.7 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	49.8%	136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	23.9%	122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.0 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	24.0%	158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	23.4 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	-0.2%	72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.4 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	47.9%	149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	+10.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	24.1%	125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.5 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	24.4%	160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.4 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	-0.2%	77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.9 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	48.5%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+10.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	25.3%	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	25.5%	157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	-0.2%	67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	50.7%	148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	28.3 / 100	+10.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	26.3%	117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	43.4 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	22.6%	169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	18.0 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	3.7%	44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	48.9%	153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.9 / 100	+7.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	25.5%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	24.3%	160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.4 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	1.3%	56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.2 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	49.8%	156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	+6.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	21.5%	145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.8 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	26.7%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	-5.2%	105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	48.1%	159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	22.9 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	30.9%	108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	+9.1 pp vs world	23.3%	170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	17.6 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	7.6%	28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	86.8 / 100	+7.4 pp vs world	54.3%	145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.8 / 100	+10.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	37.6%	94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	54.6 / 100	+14.0 pp vs world	27.9%	156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	9.7%	35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	83.4 / 100	+9.6 pp vs world	65.4%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	+18.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	27.6%	129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	37.6 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	28.5%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	-0.9%	78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	62.4 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	56.1%	153 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.9 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	25.7%	135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.6 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	29.1%	146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	-3.4%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	54.8%	152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	26.8%	129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	37.6 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	25.5%	166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	19.5 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	1.3%	69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	66.8 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	52.4%	156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	29.1%	132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.1 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	27.0%	158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	23.4 / 100	+1.5 pp vs world	2.1%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	56.1%	154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	32.6%	119 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	43.0 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	29.3%	155 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	3.3%	60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	71.5 / 100	+2.9 pp vs world	62.0%	147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	35.7%	112 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	+7.0 pp vs world	30.1%	153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	26.6 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	5.6%	54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	74.4 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	65.8%	145 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	30.4 / 100	+9.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	37.5%	103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	50.7 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world	31.4%	157 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	24.6 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	6.1%	48 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	77.3 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	68.9%	137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	34.3 / 100	+10.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	40.3%	95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	55.0 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	34.3%	147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	6.0%	44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	79.4 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	74.6%	131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	37.8 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	29.3%	109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.3 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	28.0%	164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	1.3%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	57.3%	148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	29.7 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	32.5%	112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.9 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	33.3%	137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.9 / 100	+5.6 pp vs world	-0.8%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	65.8%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	36.1%	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	33.9%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	2.2%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	70.0%	137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.9 / 100	+10.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	34.8%	108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	48.8 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	32.2%	147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	2.7%	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	67.0%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	32.4%	114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	+2.3 pp vs world	31.1%	157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	1.3%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	63.4%	143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.1 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	31.4%	124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	30.1%	169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	1.3%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	61.4%	150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.7 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	22.8%	153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	27.3 / 100	-5.4 pp vs world	25.1%	184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.4 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	-2.3%	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	47.8%	174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	17.2 / 100	-7.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	20.5%	160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.9 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world	20.0%	194 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	7.7 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	0.5%	71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	40.5%	185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.0 / 100	-13.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	21.5%	163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	22.1%	187 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	11.0 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	-0.6%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	43.6%	185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	12.0 / 100	-11.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	23.5%	157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.4 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	24.5%	180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	14.4 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	-0.9%	89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.9 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	48.0%	177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	15.8 / 100	-9.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	24.0%	150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.7 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	24.0%	182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.4 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	0.0%	84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.3 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	48.1%	176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.3 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	23.3%	137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.9 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	20.7%	188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	10.5 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	2.6%	56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	44.0%	175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.7 / 100	-7.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	27.1%	139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	26.2%	172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	0.9%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	53.3%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	30.9%	138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.4 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	31.0%	159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	-0.0%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	61.9%	156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.8 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	28.6%	136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.4 / 100	-0.5 pp vs world	28.4%	168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	20.1 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	0.1%	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	57.0%	159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	30.3%	131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	37.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	26.9%	171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	18.7 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	3.4%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	57.2%	154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	26.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.

Latest common comparison

South America40.5%2024

World57.1%2024

08 · Industry mix and structural change

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.

Full historical record

Structural change across six activities

Other activities is the largest current activity at 36.8%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.

AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.

Agriculture, forestry and fishing10.2%

1970–1990-5.8 pp1990–2010-8.5 pp2010–2024+1.5 pp

World specialization: 2.39×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities24.2%

1970–1990+3.3 pp1990–2010+0.5 pp2010–2024-7.4 pp

World specialization: 1.15×

Construction4.2%

1970–1990+0.0 pp1990–2010+2.5 pp2010–2024+0.4 pp

World specialization: 0.73×

Trade, restaurants and hotels17.7%

1970–1990-0.2 pp1990–2010-1.5 pp2010–2024+4.1 pp

World specialization: 1.22×

Transport, storage and communication6.9%

1970–1990+4.0 pp1990–2010-0.9 pp2010–2024-1.5 pp

World specialization: 0.70×

Other activities36.8%

1970–1990-1.3 pp1990–2010+7.9 pp2010–2024+2.9 pp

World specialization: 0.83×

Industry composition and economic scale

The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.

Created by Tesseron World Observatory; data from UN Statistics Division Analysis of Main Aggregates - 28 January 2026 data snapshot.

Agriculture, forestry and fishingMining, manufacturing and utilitiesConstructionTrade, restaurants and hotelsTransport, storage and communicationOther activitiesShare of total gross value added

Formation1970–1990

27.2% → 25.9%

Percentage-point change: -1.3 pp

Integration1990–2010

25.9% → 33.9%

Percentage-point change: +7.9 pp

Current era2010–2024

33.9% → 36.8%

Percentage-point change: +2.9 pp

How to read specialization

World specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.

Current specialization against world

Agriculture, forestry and fishing2.39×

Mining, manufacturing and utilities1.15×

Construction0.73×

Trade, restaurants and hotels1.22×

Transport, storage and communication0.70×

Other activities0.83×

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows

Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table

Ecuador	1970	23.0%	60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+13.6 pp vs world	27.9%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	1.2%	173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.8 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	15.3%	85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	52.3 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	5.3%	119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.0 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	27.2%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	22.9%	61 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+13.9 pp vs world	27.3%	58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	67.8 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	1.8%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	14.7%	91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	48.9 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	5.9%	107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.8 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	27.5%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	22.5%	64 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	64.0 / 100	+13.8 pp vs world	27.6%	56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	1.4%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	15.5%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	5.9%	110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	38.1 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	27.2%	93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	20.4%	68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+11.3 pp vs world	25.3%	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	1.0%	173 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	2.8 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world	13.7%	102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	5.2%	122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	31.3 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	34.4%	51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	18.9%	71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	+10.3 pp vs world	26.1%	74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	1.5%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	13.4%	108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	4.8%	126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.0 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	35.3%	44 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	75.7 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	17.2%	78 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	24.2%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	-6.5 pp vs world	1.6%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	12.5%	123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	30.7 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	5.3%	118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	39.3%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	15.6%	86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+7.7 pp vs world	24.5%	79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	55.9 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world	2.0%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	11.8%	128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	27.8 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	6.0%	105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	40.1%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	15.0%	88 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	50.3 / 100	+7.2 pp vs world	25.5%	71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	60.5 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	1.9%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	11.3%	131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.1 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	6.3%	99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	44.3 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	40.0%	26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.9 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	15.1%	85 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	+7.6 pp vs world	23.9%	82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.2 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world	2.3%	167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.2 / 100	-4.6 pp vs world	10.7%	137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.7 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	8.1%	68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	61.9 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	40.0%	28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	84.7 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	13.3%	93 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	25.6%	78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	56.5 / 100	-5.3 pp vs world	2.1%	166 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	6.8 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	10.4%	137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	22.7 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	7.7%	79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	41.0%	27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	13.1%	92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	23.1%	94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	-8.0 pp vs world	2.1%	168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.6 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	9.8%	147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.0 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	7.7%	80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.1 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	44.2%	20 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	89.3 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	12.7%	92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	23.4%	86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	-7.3 pp vs world	2.6%	165 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	7.3 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	9.4%	154 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	13.1 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	8.2%	67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	62.5 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	43.7%	27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	13.3%	86 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	51.4 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	24.6%	75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	-5.2 pp vs world	2.7%	163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	8.5 / 100	-3.5 pp vs world	8.6%	155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	12.5 / 100	-5.6 pp vs world	8.7%	61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	42.0%	37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	79.7 / 100	+6.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	14.0%	84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	52.6 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	25.1%	72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.9 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	1.9%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	10.8%	139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	10.0%	38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	79.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	38.3%	46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	15.5%	78 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	+8.7 pp vs world	28.9%	46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	1.4%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	12.3%	127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	28.4 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	7.8%	85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	52.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	34.0%	65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	63.8 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	15.9%	72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	59.4 / 100	+9.5 pp vs world	29.3%	45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	75.1 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	1.4%	172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	3.4 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	11.7%	134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	24.4 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	9.3%	48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.3 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	32.4%	81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	54.8 / 100	-4.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	17.4%	68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+11.6 pp vs world	26.9%	61 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.1 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	1.5%	169 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	5.1 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	13.0%	126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.0 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	9.9%	36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	80.1 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	31.3%	92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	48.6 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	17.9%	61 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+12.4 pp vs world	26.7%	60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	66.7 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	1.6%	170 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.5 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	13.8%	113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	36.4 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	10.2%	29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	84.1 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	29.9%	97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	45.8 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	18.1%	60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+12.7 pp vs world	30.3%	43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	76.3 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	1.5%	171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	4.0 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	14.0%	103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	11.2%	23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	87.5 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	24.9%	126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	29.4 / 100	-13.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	18.8%	57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	68.2 / 100	+13.4 pp vs world	30.3%	44 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	75.8 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	1.5%	172 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	3.9 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	15.7%	85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	10.1%	36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	80.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	23.6%	133 of 179 · highest-to-lowest	25.8 / 100	-15.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	17.2%	86 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	58.1 / 100	+12.0 pp vs world	31.2%	49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	76.6 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	1.3%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-5.0 pp vs world	15.1%	89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	9.3%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	25.9%	131 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	36.6 / 100	-13.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	18.1%	78 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	62.1 / 100	+13.3 pp vs world	31.0%	47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	77.6 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	1.4%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	16.0%	81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	9.0%	73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	64.7 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	24.5%	140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	32.2 / 100	-15.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	16.5%	83 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	59.6 / 100	+12.3 pp vs world	33.2%	39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	81.5 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world	1.4%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world	17.4%	60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.1 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	8.6%	81 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	22.8%	155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	24.9 / 100	-18.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	21.3%	59 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	71.4 / 100	+17.1 pp vs world	29.2%	51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	1.1%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	13.7%	115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	44.1 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	6.4%	135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	34.3 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	28.3%	123 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	40.5 / 100	-13.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	19.9%	66 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	68.0 / 100	+15.8 pp vs world	28.3%	53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	1.1%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	13.6%	120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	7.3%	120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	41.7 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	29.9%	113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	-11.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	19.7%	66 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	68.0 / 100	+15.8 pp vs world	26.7%	61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	70.7 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	1.1%	205 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	0.5 / 100	-4.7 pp vs world	11.7%	149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	27.5 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	8.1%	94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	32.6%	99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-9.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	18.1%	68 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	+14.0 pp vs world	26.9%	55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	0.8%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.9 pp vs world	13.3%	125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	7.2%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	33.7%	89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.1 / 100	-8.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	17.7%	70 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+13.7 pp vs world	25.0%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	1.2%	204 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.0 / 100	-4.4 pp vs world	13.5%	122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	7.2%	122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	40.7 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	35.4%	83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	60.0 / 100	-7.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	15.7%	77 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	62.6 / 100	+11.9 pp vs world	24.3%	71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	1.5%	202 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	2.0 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	14.5%	107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	48.0 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	8.2%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	35.7%	88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	57.6 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	15.1%	79 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	61.6 / 100	+11.5 pp vs world	28.5%	48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	77.1 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	1.5%	203 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	1.5 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	14.9%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	9.3%	79 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	61.8 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	30.7%	122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	41.0 / 100	-13.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	13.2%	84 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	59.1 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	34.7%	33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	84.4 / 100	+11.2 pp vs world	2.2%	193 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	6.3 / 100	-3.2 pp vs world	17.4%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	9.9%	71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.7 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	22.6%	168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	18.5 / 100	-21.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	11.4%	91 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	28.4%	53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	74.6 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	2.6%	182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	11.7 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	18.4%	52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	75.0 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	13.4%	18 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	91.7 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	25.8%	152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-18.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	10.3%	93 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	54.7 / 100	+6.9 pp vs world	27.8%	55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	2.7%	181 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	12.2 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	16.5%	72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	65.2 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	12.3%	37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	30.3%	126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	39.0 / 100	-14.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	9.8%	97 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	52.7 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	27.1%	55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	73.7 / 100	+5.0 pp vs world	2.6%	185 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	10.2 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	15.2%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	12.0%	38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	33.3%	114 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	44.9 / 100	-11.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	8.6%	104 of 204 · highest-to-lowest	49.3 / 100	+5.1 pp vs world	28.9%	50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	76.1 / 100	+6.4 pp vs world	2.9%	180 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	12.7 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	13.9%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	11.5%	50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	76.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	34.2%	104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	-10.1 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	8.2%	105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	49.0 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	31.0%	45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	78.7 / 100	+8.0 pp vs world	3.0%	178 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	14.5 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	13.5%	131 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	36.9 / 100	-1.0 pp vs world	11.1%	58 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	72.3 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	33.2%	110 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	47.3 / 100	-11.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	8.1%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	33.3%	41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	80.7 / 100	+9.8 pp vs world	3.3%	174 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	16.4 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	12.8%	137 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	10.2%	71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	32.3%	116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	44.4 / 100	-11.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	8.1%	99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.0 / 100	+4.5 pp vs world	34.0%	39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	81.6 / 100	+10.4 pp vs world	3.3%	178 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	14.5 / 100	-2.4 pp vs world	12.5%	153 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	26.2 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	9.5%	95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	+0.1 pp vs world	32.7%	113 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	45.9 / 100	-10.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	7.6%	102 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	36.8%	32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	85.2 / 100	+12.7 pp vs world	3.6%	176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.3 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	12.9%	148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	29.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	8.4%	114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	45.7 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	30.7%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-12.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	9.1%	93 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	55.3 / 100	+5.3 pp vs world	28.8%	46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	78.5 / 100	+6.5 pp vs world	4.1%	164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	22.0 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	13.7%	133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	36.5 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	9.1%	110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	47.6 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	35.2%	111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.4 / 100	-9.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	8.7%	95 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	54.4 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	31.6%	42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	80.4 / 100	+7.9 pp vs world	3.8%	169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	19.6 / 100	-1.6 pp vs world	13.6%	135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	35.6 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	8.4%	120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	42.8 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	33.9%	113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	46.4 / 100	-10.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	8.2%	99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	33.9%	39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	81.8 / 100	+9.6 pp vs world	4.8%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	13.9%	126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	39.9 / 100	-0.1 pp vs world	7.4%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	31.9%	121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.6 / 100	-11.3 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	7.3%	101 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	51.5 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	33.5%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+9.4 pp vs world	5.2%	126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	40.2 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	14.2%	124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	40.9 / 100	+0.0 pp vs world	7.1%	152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	27.4 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	32.7%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	7.3%	105 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	49.5 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	32.1%	38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.3 / 100	+8.3 pp vs world	6.4%	81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.7 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	14.7%	116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	44.7 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	7.1%	149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	28.8 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	32.5%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-10.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	7.7%	99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	+3.3 pp vs world	31.1%	37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	82.8 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	6.1%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	15.1%	112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+1.0 pp vs world	6.9%	155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	26.0 / 100	-2.1 pp vs world	33.0%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	-10.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	8.6%	93 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	55.3 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	24.1%	62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.8 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	5.9%	103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	51.2 / 100	+0.3 pp vs world	16.5%	90 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	57.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	7.8%	146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	30.3 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	37.2%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	8.6%	91 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	56.3 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	22.9%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	6.3%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	16.0%	96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	54.3 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	8.3%	130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	38.0 / 100	-0.9 pp vs world	37.9%	96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	8.4%	93 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	55.3 / 100	+4.0 pp vs world	23.6%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	6.6%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+0.9 pp vs world	16.0%	91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	56.7 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	7.8%	139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	33.7 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	37.7%	93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.0 / 100	-6.7 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	8.1%	94 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	54.9 / 100	+3.9 pp vs world	24.3%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	+1.8 pp vs world	5.4%	115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	45.5 / 100	-0.3 pp vs world	16.4%	88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	58.2 / 100	+2.2 pp vs world	7.8%	141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest	32.7 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	38.0%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-6.2 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	8.3%	88 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	57.8 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	23.3%	74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.1 / 100	+1.6 pp vs world	5.1%	135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	35.9 / 100	-0.7 pp vs world	16.6%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	+2.4 pp vs world	8.0%	139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	38.7%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	-5.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	9.0%	90 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	56.8 / 100	+4.4 pp vs world	21.6%	88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	58.4 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	4.0%	162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.0 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	16.4%	73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	65.6 / 100	+2.7 pp vs world	8.0%	124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	41.1 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	41.1%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-4.5 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	8.6%	94 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	54.9 / 100	+4.1 pp vs world	24.8%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	+2.5 pp vs world	4.3%	146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	30.6 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	17.4%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	+3.5 pp vs world	7.3%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	37.6%	98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.6 / 100	-6.4 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	7.8%	99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	52.4 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	26.5%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	+3.7 pp vs world	4.5%	140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	33.5 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	17.7%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	7.0%	142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	32.5 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	36.4%	97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	54.1 / 100	-6.8 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	8.5%	90 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	56.8 / 100	+4.2 pp vs world	24.8%	70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.0 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	4.5%	146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	30.6 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	17.7%	72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	66.0 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	7.1%	144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	31.6 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	37.4%	99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	53.1 / 100	-6.6 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	10.2%	76 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	24.2%	68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.9 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	4.2%	151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	28.2 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	17.7%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+3.2 pp vs world	6.9%	147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	30.1 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	36.8%	106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	49.8 / 100	-7.7 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

09 · Manufacturing position

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.

Full historical record

Manufacturing in the economic structure

Manufacturing accounts for 13.8% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Ecuador was 1.8 percentage points below the world value.

Latest share: 13.8%
World specialization: 0.88×
Latest year: 2024

Formation1970–1990

25.9% → 24.6%

Percentage-point change: -1.4 pp

Integration1990–2010

24.6% → 14.0%

Percentage-point change: -10.6 pp

Current era2010–2024

14.0% → 13.8%

Percentage-point change: -0.2 pp

Share of total GVA13.8%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share within parent activity57.0%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Real manufacturing growth-2.5%2024 · Published series · World rank 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Share of world manufacturing0.1%2024 · Derived measure · World rank 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows

Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.

Filter rows

From yearTo year

Showing 55 of 55 rows

Manufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table

Ecuador	1970	25.9%	20 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	89.1 / 100	-0.0 pp vs world	93.1%	19 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	89.7 / 100	+9.0 pp vs world	Source observation unavailable	Not calculable without a source observation	Not calculable without a source observation	Comparable world observation unavailable	0.1%	51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	71.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1971	26.0%	17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	90.9 / 100	+0.4 pp vs world	95.2%	10 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	94.9 / 100	+11.5 pp vs world	2.7%	118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	33.1 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	0.1%	53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1972	24.7%	25 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	86.3 / 100	-0.8 pp vs world	89.8%	39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	78.3 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	1.3%	147 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	16.6 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	0.1%	55 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1973	20.6%	48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	73.1 / 100	-5.1 pp vs world	81.2%	87 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	50.9 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	2.0%	136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	22.9 / 100	-7.0 pp vs world	0.1%	60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1974	20.4%	51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	71.4 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	78.0%	90 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	49.1 / 100	-1.2 pp vs world	12.5%	31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	82.9 / 100	+11.2 pp vs world	0.1%	53 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1975	19.9%	52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	70.9 / 100	-4.3 pp vs world	82.5%	75 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	57.7 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	27.1%	7 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	96.6 / 100	+30.0 pp vs world	0.1%	52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	70.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1976	20.5%	49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	72.6 / 100	-3.9 pp vs world	83.7%	72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	59.4 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	8.4%	67 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	62.3 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	0.1%	49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	72.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1977	21.8%	39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	78.3 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	85.7%	60 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	66.3 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	-4.6%	160 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	9.1 / 100	-8.5 pp vs world	0.1%	46 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	74.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1978	21.1%	43 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	76.0 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	88.3%	48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	73.1 / 100	+9.3 pp vs world	16.1%	20 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	89.1 / 100	+12.6 pp vs world	0.1%	49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	72.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1979	21.3%	42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	76.7 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	83.4%	73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	59.1 / 100	+6.2 pp vs world	1.2%	130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	0.1%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1980	18.8%	61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	65.9 / 100	-4.1 pp vs world	81.2%	81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	54.5 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	-1.1%	125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	29.5 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	0.1%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1981	18.9%	57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	68.2 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	80.8%	86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.7 / 100	+7.3 pp vs world	14.3%	16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	91.5 / 100	+12.9 pp vs world	0.1%	44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1982	20.2%	44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	-1.9 pp vs world	81.9%	75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.0 / 100	+7.8 pp vs world	0.2%	95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	46.6 / 100	+1.9 pp vs world	0.1%	44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	75.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1983	19.9%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	79.4%	84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	52.8 / 100	+5.4 pp vs world	2.3%	87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	51.1 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	0.1%	51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1984	23.5%	25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	81.3%	74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	0.7%	131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	26.1 / 100	-4.8 pp vs world	0.1%	48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1985	23.1%	31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	83.0 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	78.6%	79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	55.7 / 100	+3.0 pp vs world	3.0%	94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	47.2 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	0.1%	47 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	73.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1986	22.7%	33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	81.8 / 100	+0.8 pp vs world	84.4%	56 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	68.8 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	2.3%	103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	42.0 / 100	+0.2 pp vs world	0.1%	53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	70.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1987	23.5%	29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	84.1 / 100	+1.7 pp vs world	88.0%	34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	81.3 / 100	+8.6 pp vs world	5.8%	72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	59.7 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	0.1%	54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1988	24.4%	25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	86.4 / 100	+2.6 pp vs world	80.7%	74 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	58.5 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	-2.2%	147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	17.0 / 100	-7.9 pp vs world	0.1%	57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	68.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1989	24.5%	24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	87.0 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	80.9%	73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	59.3 / 100	+1.1 pp vs world	1.0%	120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest	32.4 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	0.1%	57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1990	24.6%	35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	78.9%	92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.4 / 100	+0.5 pp vs world	10.1%	31 of 178 · highest-to-lowest	83.1 / 100	+8.9 pp vs world	0.1%	62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1991	26.1%	31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	84.2%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	2.1%	91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	55.9 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	0.1%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1992	28.5%	14 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	93.6 / 100	+8.7 pp vs world	85.8%	57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	+7.5 pp vs world	1.4%	103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	50.0 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	0.1%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1993	24.7%	26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	87.7 / 100	+5.5 pp vs world	84.6%	60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.1 / 100	+7.1 pp vs world	4.1%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	0.1%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1994	24.9%	21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	90.2 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	88.2%	37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	82.4 / 100	+9.9 pp vs world	6.6%	62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	70.1 / 100	+3.1 pp vs world	0.1%	53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	74.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1995	23.7%	23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	89.2 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	88.8%	31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+10.7 pp vs world	-4.0%	175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	14.7 / 100	-8.9 pp vs world	0.1%	57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1996	23.4%	26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	87.7 / 100	+4.8 pp vs world	87.1%	39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	81.4 / 100	+10.6 pp vs world	7.8%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	+5.2 pp vs world	0.1%	56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.0 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1997	21.7%	34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.8 / 100	+3.4 pp vs world	86.7%	38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	81.9 / 100	+10.7 pp vs world	-3.1%	187 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	8.8 / 100	-7.6 pp vs world	0.1%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1998	21.6%	35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+3.8 pp vs world	88.6%	31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	85.3 / 100	+11.8 pp vs world	6.2%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	+4.9 pp vs world	0.1%	55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	73.5 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	1999	23.3%	23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	89.2 / 100	+5.8 pp vs world	81.6%	67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	67.6 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	-8.4%	193 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	5.9 / 100	-11.7 pp vs world	0.1%	60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2000	25.5%	17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	92.2 / 100	+8.1 pp vs world	73.3%	108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	47.5 / 100	-0.6 pp vs world	18.4%	19 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	91.2 / 100	+12.0 pp vs world	0.1%	60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2001	22.3%	28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	86.8 / 100	+5.9 pp vs world	78.4%	85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	58.8 / 100	+5.7 pp vs world	1.3%	127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	38.2 / 100	+2.1 pp vs world	0.1%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2002	20.6%	35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	83.3 / 100	+4.7 pp vs world	74.1%	98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	52.5 / 100	+2.0 pp vs world	1.6%	134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	34.8 / 100	+0.6 pp vs world	0.1%	59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	71.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2003	18.7%	48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	77.0 / 100	+2.8 pp vs world	68.9%	119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	42.2 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	-0.6%	161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	21.6 / 100	-4.0 pp vs world	0.1%	58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	72.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2004	17.1%	66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	68.3 / 100	-0.2 pp vs world	59.0%	136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	34.1 / 100	-17.5 pp vs world	4.6%	101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest	51.0 / 100	-15.0 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	69.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2005	15.6%	75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	64.3 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	50.2%	155 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	25.6 / 100	-23.7 pp vs world	3.9%	113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest	45.4 / 100	-0.4 pp vs world	0.1%	65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2006	14.8%	81 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	61.4 / 100	-2.3 pp vs world	44.4%	164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	21.3 / 100	-28.1 pp vs world	3.8%	127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	38.8 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	0.1%	65 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	69.1 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2007	14.9%	81 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	61.4 / 100	-2.2 pp vs world	43.7%	164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	21.3 / 100	-28.7 pp vs world	2.6%	136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest	34.5 / 100	-3.4 pp vs world	0.1%	66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	68.6 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2008	14.2%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-2.6 pp vs world	38.6%	172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	18.2 / 100	-31.3 pp vs world	7.8%	43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest	79.7 / 100	+6.6 pp vs world	0.1%	67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2009	15.2%	75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.6 / 100	-1.1 pp vs world	52.6%	149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	29.2 / 100	-20.1 pp vs world	-0.3%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	+6.1 pp vs world	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2010	14.0%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	44.3%	155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	26.3 / 100	-26.5 pp vs world	-4.7%	182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	13.4 / 100	-13.8 pp vs world	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2011	13.3%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	39.2%	166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.1 / 100	-30.1 pp vs world	5.6%	83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	60.8 / 100	+1.3 pp vs world	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2012	13.1%	85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	59.8 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	39.2%	165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	21.5 / 100	-30.3 pp vs world	3.6%	79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.7 / 100	+1.2 pp vs world	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2013	12.8%	91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	56.9 / 100	-3.8 pp vs world	39.9%	162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.0 / 100	-30.1 pp vs world	3.8%	78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.2 / 100	+0.7 pp vs world	0.1%	65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.4 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2014	13.7%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	44.0%	156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	25.8 / 100	-27.7 pp vs world	2.7%	101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	52.2 / 100	-1.5 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2015	15.3%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-1.7 pp vs world	63.4%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-12.8 pp vs world	1.1%	138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.4 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	0.1%	59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.2 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2016	15.5%	61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.3 / 100	-1.3 pp vs world	67.6%	110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	47.8 / 100	-9.8 pp vs world	-0.3%	162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.0 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	0.1%	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2017	14.8%	69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	67.5 / 100	-2.0 pp vs world	62.6%	122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	42.1 / 100	-13.5 pp vs world	4.7%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	+1.4 pp vs world	0.1%	58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	72.7 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2018	14.2%	76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	64.1 / 100	-2.7 pp vs world	58.4%	129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.8 / 100	-16.6 pp vs world	0.9%	163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	22.5 / 100	-3.1 pp vs world	0.1%	60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	71.8 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2019	13.5%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-2.9 pp vs world	57.9%	130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.3 / 100	-17.6 pp vs world	-2.2%	176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	16.3 / 100	-3.6 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2020	13.8%	82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	61.2 / 100	-2.5 pp vs world	64.0%	118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	44.0 / 100	-13.5 pp vs world	-10.6%	162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	23.0 / 100	-8.2 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2021	13.9%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-3.0 pp vs world	55.8%	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-19.6 pp vs world	14.9%	23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	89.5 / 100	+6.0 pp vs world	0.1%	66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	68.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2022	13.5%	90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	57.4 / 100	-2.8 pp vs world	51.0%	139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	34.0 / 100	-20.9 pp vs world	6.6%	55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	74.2 / 100	+4.6 pp vs world	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2023	14.1%	80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	62.2 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	57.0%	128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	39.2 / 100	-16.4 pp vs world	0.2%	120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	43.1 / 100	-1.4 pp vs world	0.1%	63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	70.3 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world
Ecuador	2024	13.8%	77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	63.6 / 100	-1.8 pp vs world	57.0%	129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	38.8 / 100	-17.0 pp vs world	-2.5%	173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	17.7 / 100	-5.5 pp vs world	0.1%	64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest	69.9 / 100	-99.9 pp vs world

Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).

Interpretation note

Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.

Current manufacturing specialization

South America0.99×

World0.88×

Ecuador Economic Overview

Read the economy through three eras

What should a reader know first?

Real output, indexed to a shared starting year

Real GDP trajectory

How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?

Nominal GDP

Nominal GDP and UN benchmarks

What does the record show per person?

GDP per person

GDP per person and UN benchmarks

How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?

Real GDP growth

Real GDP growth and UN benchmarks

How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?

Final Consumption

Final consumption and UN benchmarks

How much current output is directed toward capital formation?

Gross Capital Formation

Gross capital formation and UN benchmarks

How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?

Trade openness

Trade openness and UN benchmarks

Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?

Structural change across six activities

Industry composition and economic scale

Broad industry structure over time

What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?

Manufacturing in the economic structure