Source-specific country analysis
Czechia Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table35 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | $41.02B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $3,981 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | $30.07B | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -11.6% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | $2,918 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 65.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | $35.16B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -0.5% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | $3,410 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 72.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | $41.16B | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $3,988 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 84.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | $48.19B | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 2.9% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $4,668 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 93.8 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | $60.57B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | $5,874 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 108.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | $67.80B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $6,585 | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 120.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | $62.54B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -0.6% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | $6,084 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 113.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | $67.19B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -0.4% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | $6,545 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 124.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | $65.59B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.4% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $6,398 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 118.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | $62.17B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $6,073 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 110.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | $68.14B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 2.9% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $6,659 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 123.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | $82.61B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 1.5% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | $8,068 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | $100.44B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.3% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $9,800 | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 160.0 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | $120.15B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $11,709 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 172.0 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | $137.26B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.4% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $13,352 | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | 183.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | $156.24B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $15,162 | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 194.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | $190.04B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $18,384 | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | 211.7 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | $236.51B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 132 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $22,789 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 242.0 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | $206.97B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -4.8% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | $19,861 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 225.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | $211.17B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.7% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $20,180 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 211.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | $231.43B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | $22,050 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 210.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | $210.36B | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -0.8% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | $20,021 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 189.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | $213.02B | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | $20,266 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 188.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | $210.91B | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.2% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | $20,054 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 184.0 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | $189.11B | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $17,968 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 176.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | $198.16B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | $18,815 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 183.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | $221.56B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $21,019 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 195.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | $251.99B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | $23,888 | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 211.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | $256.79B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $24,329 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 214.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | $251.11B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -5.3% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | $23,802 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 217.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | $290.97B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | $27,631 | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 222.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | $301.83B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.8% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | $28,279 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 220.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | $343.21B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -0.1% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | $31,750 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 239.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | $345.04B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.1% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $32,139 | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 235.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$41.02B → $41.02B
Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR$41.02B → $211.17B
Compound annual change: +8.5% CAGR$211.17B → $345.04B
Compound annual change: +3.6% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | $41.02B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $150.08B | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | $30.07B | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $132.65B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | $35.16B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $131.98B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | $41.16B | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $132.06B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | $48.19B | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $135.90B | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | $60.57B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $144.36B | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | $67.80B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $150.37B | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | $62.54B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $149.48B | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | $67.19B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $148.89B | 40 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | $65.59B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $150.94B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | $62.17B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $157.00B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | $68.14B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $161.58B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | $82.61B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $164.02B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | $100.44B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $169.44B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | $120.15B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $177.46B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | $137.26B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $188.77B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | $156.24B | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $201.28B | 42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | $190.04B | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $212.32B | 42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | $236.51B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $217.87B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | $206.97B | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $207.42B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | $211.17B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $213.05B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | $231.43B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $216.82B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | $210.36B | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $215.15B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | $213.02B | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $215.06B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | $210.91B | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $219.89B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | $189.11B | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $230.79B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | $198.16B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $236.75B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | $221.56B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $249.00B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | $251.99B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $256.05B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | $256.79B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $265.18B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | $251.11B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $251.11B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | $290.97B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $261.23B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | $301.83B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $268.66B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | $343.21B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $268.52B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | $345.04B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $271.52B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$3,981 → $3,981
Compound annual change: 0.0% CAGR$3,981 → $20,180
Compound annual change: +8.5% CAGR$20,180 → $32,139
Compound annual change: +3.4% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | $3,981 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 91.8 (world = 100) | $14,568 | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | 203.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1991 | $2,918 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 65.1 (world = 100) | $12,873 | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 180.7 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1992 | $3,410 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 72.3 (world = 100) | $12,798 | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 178.9 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1993 | $3,988 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 84.2 (world = 100) | $12,796 | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 178.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1994 | $4,668 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 93.8 (world = 100) | $13,166 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 180.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1995 | $5,874 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 108.0 (world = 100) | $13,999 | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 188.9 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1996 | $6,585 | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | 120.2 (world = 100) | $14,605 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 193.1 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1997 | $6,084 | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | 113.2 (world = 100) | $14,541 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 187.7 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1998 | $6,545 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 124.2 (world = 100) | $14,504 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 184.6 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 1999 | $6,398 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 118.4 (world = 100) | $14,724 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 183.4 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2000 | $6,073 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 110.6 (world = 100) | $15,336 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 185.3 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2001 | $6,659 | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | 123.6 (world = 100) | $15,791 | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 189.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2002 | $8,068 | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | 145.9 (world = 100) | $16,019 | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 190.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2003 | $9,800 | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 160.0 (world = 100) | $16,532 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 193.4 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2004 | $11,709 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 172.0 (world = 100) | $17,294 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 196.2 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2005 | $13,352 | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | 183.3 (world = 100) | $18,363 | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | 203.0 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2006 | $15,162 | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 194.4 (world = 100) | $19,533 | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 209.4 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2007 | $18,384 | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | 211.7 (world = 100) | $20,539 | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | 213.7 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2008 | $22,789 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 242.0 (world = 100) | $20,993 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 216.9 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2009 | $19,861 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 225.1 (world = 100) | $19,904 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 211.3 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2010 | $20,180 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 211.5 (world = 100) | $20,360 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 209.6 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2011 | $22,050 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 210.4 (world = 100) | $20,659 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 208.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2012 | $20,021 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 189.4 (world = 100) | $20,476 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 203.7 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2013 | $20,266 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 188.5 (world = 100) | $20,460 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 200.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2014 | $20,054 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 184.0 (world = 100) | $20,908 | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 201.2 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2015 | $17,968 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 176.4 (world = 100) | $21,929 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 207.1 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2016 | $18,815 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 183.9 (world = 100) | $22,479 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 209.1 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2017 | $21,019 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 195.2 (world = 100) | $23,621 | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 214.9 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2018 | $23,888 | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 211.3 (world = 100) | $24,272 | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 216.2 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2019 | $24,329 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 214.4 (world = 100) | $25,124 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 220.3 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2020 | $23,802 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 217.2 (world = 100) | $23,802 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 217.2 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2021 | $27,631 | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 222.6 (world = 100) | $24,806 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 214.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2022 | $28,279 | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | 220.8 (world = 100) | $25,172 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 212.4 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2023 | $31,750 | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | 239.5 (world = 100) | $24,840 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 205.5 (world = 100) |
| Czechia | 2024 | $32,139 | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 235.1 (world = 100) | $25,291 | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | 205.2 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable-11.6% → 2.7%
Average annual rate: +1.9%2.7% → 1.1%
Average annual rate: +1.8%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 21.1 | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1991 | -11.6% | 192 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | -11.6% | 191 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 7.3 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 28.8 | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1992 | -0.5% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -0.6% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 32.3 | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1993 | 0.1% | 138 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | -0.0% | 115 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 39.1 | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1994 | 2.9% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.9% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 44.0 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1995 | 6.2% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 6.3% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 48.0 | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1996 | 4.2% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 4.3% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 52.7 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1997 | -0.6% | 182 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 11.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -0.4% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 57.1 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1998 | -0.4% | 172 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -0.3% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 62.8 | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 |
| Czechia | 1999 | 1.4% | 150 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 1.5% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 64.7 | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2000 | 4.0% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 4.2% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 65.9 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2001 | 2.9% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 3.0% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 69.1 | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2002 | 1.5% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 1.4% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 71.0 | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2003 | 3.3% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 72.0 | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2004 | 4.7% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 4.6% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 75.0 | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2005 | 6.4% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.2% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 75.1 | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2006 | 6.6% | 71 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 6.4% | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 75.6 | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2007 | 5.5% | 107 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 5.2% | 76 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 78.3 | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2008 | 2.6% | 132 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 2.2% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 79.8 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2009 | -4.8% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -5.2% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 82.0 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2010 | 2.7% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 2.3% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 81.6 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2011 | 1.8% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 81.4 | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2012 | -0.8% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | -0.9% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 82.5 | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2013 | -0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | -0.1% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 83.5 | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2014 | 2.2% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 2.2% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 85.8 | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2015 | 5.0% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 4.9% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 86.8 | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2016 | 2.6% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 2.5% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 88.1 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2017 | 5.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 5.1% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 89.6 | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2018 | 2.8% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 92.1 | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2019 | 3.6% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 3.5% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 95.7 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2020 | -5.3% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -5.3% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2021 | 4.0% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 4.2% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 104.0 | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2022 | 2.8% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 113.1 | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2023 | -0.1% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -1.3% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 122.2 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 |
| Czechia | 2024 | 1.1% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 1.8% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 127.1 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
71.5% → 71.5%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp71.5% → 70.2%
Percentage-point change: -1.3 pp70.2% → 67.4%
Percentage-point change: -2.8 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | 71.5% | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 49.5% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 22.0% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 95.8% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | 69.2% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 47.6% | 180 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 21.6% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 91.5% | 182 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 11.3 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | 72.1% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 51.6% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 20.7% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 97.5% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | 71.1% | 168 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 50.1% | 170 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 21.0% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 97.6% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | 70.7% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 49.4% | 177 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 21.3% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 100.5% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | 69.2% | 174 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 48.9% | 179 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 12.7 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 20.3% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 103.0% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | 69.0% | 171 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.1 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 49.4% | 175 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 19.6% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 104.8% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | 71.4% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 51.2% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 20.2% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 104.1% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | 69.6% | 178 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 13.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 50.4% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 19.2% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 100.3% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | 70.7% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 50.7% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 20.0% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 100.5% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | 70.0% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 50.4% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 19.7% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 101.9% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | 69.3% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 49.7% | 167 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world | 19.6% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 101.3% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | 70.8% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 49.7% | 169 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 21.1% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 101.3% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | 72.0% | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 49.9% | 171 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world | 22.1% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 101.5% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | 69.6% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 48.7% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 20.8% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 99.4% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | 68.4% | 161 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 47.9% | 174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 20.5% | 41 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 97.7% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | 67.2% | 161 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 47.1% | 171 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 17.5 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 20.1% | 40 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 81.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 97.3% | 141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | 65.5% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 46.1% | 169 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 18.4 / 100 | -11.4 pp vs world | 19.3% | 46 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.2 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 97.6% | 145 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | 66.8% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 47.5% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 19.4% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 97.8% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | 69.7% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 48.8% | 172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.8 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 20.9% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 96.1% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | 70.2% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 49.7% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 20.5% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 97.0% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | 69.6% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 49.9% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 19.8% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 96.2% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | 69.6% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 50.1% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 95.3% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | 70.0% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 50.2% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 19.7% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 94.3% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | 68.4% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 49.0% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 19.3% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 93.7% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | 67.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 48.1% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 18.9% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 94.0% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | 67.3% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 48.4% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 18.9% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 92.3% | 183 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | 67.3% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 48.7% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 18.6% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 92.4% | 182 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | 68.3% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 49.0% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 19.2% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 93.9% | 169 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | 67.7% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 48.4% | 176 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 19.4% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 93.9% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | 68.5% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 47.1% | 181 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 13.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 21.4% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 93.3% | 184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | 68.1% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 47.2% | 172 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.8 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 20.9% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 96.3% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | 68.2% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 48.6% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 19.6% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 99.2% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | 67.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 47.2% | 178 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.9 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 19.7% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 95.0% | 159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | 67.4% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 47.3% | 179 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world | 20.1% | 62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 93.4% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
24.3% → 24.3%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp24.3% → 26.7%
Percentage-point change: +2.4 pp26.7% → 26.0%
Percentage-point change: -0.7 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | 24.3% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 24.7% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Czechia | 1991 | 22.3% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 23.5% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Czechia | 1992 | 25.4% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 27.3% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable |
| Czechia | 1993 | 26.5% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 27.7% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | -0.4% | 128 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | 29.8% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 29.2% | 33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 104 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 39.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | 33.9% | 24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 33.6% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 0.2% | 125 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | 35.8% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 34.3% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 1.5% | 58 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | 32.7% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 32.4% | 27 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.3 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 0.3% | 114 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | 30.7% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 31.0% | 31 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | -0.2% | 142 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 15.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | 29.7% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 30.1% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | -0.4% | 133 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | 31.8% | 25 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.2 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 31.2% | 21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 101 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | 32.0% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 31.1% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 0.9% | 72 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | 30.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 29.8% | 24 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 0.7% | 85 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | 29.5% | 33 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 84.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 29.4% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 133 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | 29.8% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 28.7% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 1.1% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | 29.3% | 46 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.2 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 28.6% | 38 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.7% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | 30.1% | 47 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 28.2% | 45 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 1.8% | 47 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | 32.1% | 44 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 29.8% | 44 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 2.4% | 46 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 74.7 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | 31.0% | 57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 29.0% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 2.0% | 59 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | 26.4% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 27.3% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | -0.9% | 134 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 25.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | 26.7% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 26.6% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | 26.6% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 26.2% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 0.4% | 118 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | 25.7% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 25.5% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | 24.4% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 24.9% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | -0.5% | 159 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 9.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | 25.3% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 24.9% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 99 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | 27.0% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 25.8% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 1.2% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | 25.1% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 24.5% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 81 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | 25.1% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 23.8% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 1.3% | 57 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | 25.6% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 25.0% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 100 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | 26.2% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 25.9% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 120 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | 24.7% | 73 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 25.7% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | -1.0% | 148 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 14.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | 28.1% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 26.4% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 1.7% | 57 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 67.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | 31.0% | 40 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 28.0% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 3.1% | 41 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | 28.0% | 52 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 27.4% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 74 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | 26.0% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 26.3% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 123 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 24.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Czechia is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
63.1% → 63.1%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp63.1% → 126.8%
Percentage-point change: +63.7 pp126.8% → 131.9%
Percentage-point change: +5.2 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices35 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | 32.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 30.4% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 2.3% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 63.1% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +24.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | 38.2% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 32.6% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 5.5% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 70.8% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +33.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | 39.6% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | 38.4% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | 1.2% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 78.0% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | 39.7% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +20.9 pp vs world | 38.5% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | 1.1% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 78.2% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +41.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | 36.8% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 38.0% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +19.0 pp vs world | -1.1% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 74.8% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +36.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | 39.9% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world | 43.0% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | -3.0% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 82.9% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +42.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | 37.9% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 42.7% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | -4.8% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 80.6% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +38.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | 40.0% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 44.1% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +22.7 pp vs world | -4.1% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 84.2% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +40.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | 41.8% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +20.0 pp vs world | 42.1% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | -0.3% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 83.9% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | +40.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | 42.5% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 43.0% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | -0.5% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 85.5% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +42.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | 47.8% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | 49.7% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +26.3 pp vs world | -1.9% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 97.5% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +50.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | 48.6% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world | 49.9% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +27.0 pp vs world | -1.3% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 98.5% | 57 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +52.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | 44.8% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world | 46.1% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | -1.3% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 90.9% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +44.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | 46.6% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world | 48.1% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +24.3 pp vs world | -1.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 94.6% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +46.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | 56.9% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | 56.3% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +30.8 pp vs world | 0.6% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 113.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +62.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | 61.8% | 37 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 82.6 / 100 | +34.7 pp vs world | 59.4% | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | +32.8 pp vs world | 2.3% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 121.2% | 42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +67.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | 64.9% | 32 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.0 / 100 | +36.2 pp vs world | 62.2% | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +34.1 pp vs world | 2.7% | 68 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 127.1% | 39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.6 / 100 | +70.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | 66.2% | 31 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.5 / 100 | +36.6 pp vs world | 63.7% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +34.9 pp vs world | 2.4% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 129.9% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +71.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | 63.0% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +32.1 pp vs world | 60.9% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | 2.2% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 123.9% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +62.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | 58.5% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +32.2 pp vs world | 54.6% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +29.0 pp vs world | 3.9% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 113.0% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +61.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | 64.9% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +36.3 pp vs world | 61.9% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +34.2 pp vs world | 3.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 126.8% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +70.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | 70.3% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +39.9 pp vs world | 66.5% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +37.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 136.8% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +76.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | 75.1% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +45.0 pp vs world | 70.4% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +41.2 pp vs world | 4.7% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 145.5% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +86.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | 75.6% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +45.5 pp vs world | 69.9% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +40.8 pp vs world | 5.7% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 145.5% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +86.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | 81.4% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +51.6 pp vs world | 75.1% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +46.1 pp vs world | 6.3% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 156.4% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +97.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | 80.0% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +51.9 pp vs world | 74.0% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +46.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 154.0% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +98.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | 78.1% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +50.9 pp vs world | 70.4% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +44.0 pp vs world | 7.7% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 148.5% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +95.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | 77.7% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +49.6 pp vs world | 70.1% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +42.7 pp vs world | 7.6% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 147.8% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +92.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | 75.6% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +46.5 pp vs world | 69.5% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +41.3 pp vs world | 6.1% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 145.1% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +87.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | 72.1% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +44.0 pp vs world | 66.0% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +38.5 pp vs world | 6.1% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 138.2% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +82.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | 67.8% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +41.7 pp vs world | 61.0% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world | 6.7% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 128.8% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +77.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | 70.6% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +41.9 pp vs world | 66.8% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +39.2 pp vs world | 3.7% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 137.4% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +81.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | 72.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +41.5 pp vs world | 71.6% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +41.5 pp vs world | 0.8% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 144.0% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +83.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | 69.0% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +39.9 pp vs world | 64.0% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world | 5.0% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 133.0% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +75.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | 69.2% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +40.3 pp vs world | 62.7% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +34.6 pp vs world | 6.6% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 131.9% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +74.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 41.6%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 0.49×
World specialization: 1.26×
World specialization: 0.97×
World specialization: 0.86×
World specialization: 1.27×
World specialization: 0.93×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
25.6% → 25.6%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp25.6% → 38.6%
Percentage-point change: +13.1 pp38.6% → 41.6%
Percentage-point change: +2.9 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table35 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | 8.7% | 129 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 38.7% | 20 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 7.9% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 13.3% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 5.8% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 25.6% | 136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | 6.5% | 144 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 29.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 39.3% | 21 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +13.3 pp vs world | 6.6% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 13.4% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 6.7% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 27.4% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | 4.9% | 154 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 36.7% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 6.1% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 13.6% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 7.7% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 31.0% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | 4.9% | 155 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 32.0% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 6.5% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 13.0% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 9.5% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 34.1% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | 4.8% | 156 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 31.4% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 13.5% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 9.3% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 34.4% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | 4.4% | 156 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 31.0% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 7.6% | 37 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 13.8% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 9.8% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 33.4% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | 4.3% | 155 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.1 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 31.9% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 7.7% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 13.4% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 10.1% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 32.7% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | 3.8% | 158 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 31.5% | 35 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 7.4% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 14.0% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 10.7% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 32.6% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | 3.8% | 155 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.1 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 30.6% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 7.3% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 13.8% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 10.8% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 33.7% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | 3.5% | 154 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 30.2% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 6.8% | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 14.2% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 11.2% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 34.2% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | 3.5% | 154 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 30.4% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 6.1% | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 14.9% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 11.5% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 33.5% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | 3.5% | 153 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 31.0% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 6.0% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 14.5% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 11.5% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 33.5% | 107 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | 2.9% | 159 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 29.8% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 6.3% | 64 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 11.7% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 34.5% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -10.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | 2.7% | 159 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 28.7% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 6.5% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 14.5% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.0% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 35.6% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | 2.7% | 156 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 30.5% | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 6.4% | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 13.8% | 123 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 11.6% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 35.0% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | 2.5% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 30.4% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 6.7% | 60 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 13.8% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 11.5% | 45 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 78.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 35.1% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | 2.4% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 31.4% | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 6.3% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.8% | 129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 11.7% | 37 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 34.5% | 101 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | 2.3% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 31.3% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 6.4% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.5% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 11.8% | 33 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 34.7% | 104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | 2.1% | 161 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 30.7% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 6.3% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 11.6% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 35.7% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | 1.9% | 165 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 20.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 29.5% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 7.0% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 12.6% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 11.2% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 37.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | 1.7% | 166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 29.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 7.0% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 12.5% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 11.0% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 38.6% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | 2.2% | 159 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 30.5% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 6.4% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 12.4% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 10.7% | 50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 37.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | 2.5% | 150 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 30.4% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 5.8% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 12.4% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 10.7% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 38.2% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | 2.6% | 149 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 30.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 5.7% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 12.2% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 10.5% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 38.6% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | 2.6% | 150 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 31.5% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 5.6% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 12.2% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 10.4% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 37.7% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | 2.5% | 150 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 31.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 5.6% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 12.6% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 10.5% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 37.2% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | 2.4% | 156 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 31.3% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.5% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 10.7% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 37.7% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | 2.3% | 156 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 30.5% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 5.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 13.0% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 10.9% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 38.0% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | 2.2% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 29.2% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 5.5% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 12.8% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 11.0% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 39.3% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | 2.1% | 160 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 28.6% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 5.4% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 12.6% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 11.4% | 41 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 39.8% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | 2.1% | 164 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 27.0% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 5.5% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 11.8% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 11.7% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 41.8% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | 1.9% | 163 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 25.9% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 5.4% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 12.5% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 11.9% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 42.4% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | 2.3% | 153 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 26.2 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 26.6% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 5.5% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.5% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 12.0% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 41.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | 2.3% | 157 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 27.2% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 5.6% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.4% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 12.0% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 40.9% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | 2.1% | 162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 26.6% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 5.6% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.4% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 12.4% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 41.6% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 21.9% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Czechia was 6.3 percentage points above the world value.
- Latest share
- 21.9%
- World specialization
- 1.40×
- Latest year
- 2024
31.9% → 31.9%
Percentage-point change: 0.0 pp31.9% → 22.8%
Percentage-point change: -9.1 pp22.8% → 21.9%
Percentage-point change: -0.9 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table35 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 35 of 35 rows
| Czechia | 1990 | 31.9% | 11 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 95.1 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 82.4% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.2% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1991 | 31.4% | 13 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 94.1 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 80.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | -25.1% | 197 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -25.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1992 | 27.7% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 75.5% | 104 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | -4.0% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1993 | 23.9% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 74.8% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | -0.5% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1994 | 23.5% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 74.8% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 3.6% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1995 | 23.5% | 26 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 87.7 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 75.8% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 8.1% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1996 | 24.5% | 22 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.7 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 76.8% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 8.4% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 0.3% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1997 | 25.3% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 80.4% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 3.0% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1998 | 24.9% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 81.3% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 1.8% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 1999 | 24.7% | 17 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 81.8% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 6.1% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.3% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2000 | 25.5% | 16 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 92.6 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 83.8% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 9.0% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2001 | 25.8% | 15 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 93.1 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 83.1% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 3.8% | 84 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.3% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2002 | 24.3% | 20 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.7 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 81.5% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 4.4% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.3% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2003 | 23.6% | 21 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 90.2 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 82.1% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 0.8% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2004 | 25.0% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 82.0% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 9.1% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2005 | 24.9% | 14 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 82.0% | 58 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 19 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 91.2 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2006 | 25.5% | 13 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 94.2 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 81.3% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 21.2% | 16 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 33 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.5 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2007 | 25.6% | 11 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 81.7% | 56 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 7.3% | 66 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 0.5% | 31 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.5 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2008 | 24.2% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 78.7% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 8.7% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 0.5% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | -99.5 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2009 | 22.5% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 76.3% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | -11.7% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2010 | 22.8% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 78.2% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 11.6% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2011 | 24.2% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 79.3% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 11.1% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 0.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2012 | 24.1% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 79.4% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | -3.9% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2013 | 24.3% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 79.8% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | -0.9% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2014 | 25.9% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 82.4% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 3.5% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2015 | 26.3% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 83.3% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 7.8% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.4% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2016 | 26.4% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 84.3% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 4.5% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2017 | 25.8% | 10 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.7 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 84.5% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2018 | 24.7% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 84.7% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 2.0% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.4% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2019 | 24.4% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 85.4% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 4.4% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2020 | 22.8% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 84.3% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | -10.7% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2021 | 21.5% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 83.3% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 1.6% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 0.4% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2022 | 21.3% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 80.0% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 8.3% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2023 | 22.4% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 82.1% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 3.9% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.4% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Czechia | 2024 | 21.9% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 82.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | -4.1% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 0.4% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization