Source-specific country analysis
Curaçao Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table20 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | $2.34B | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $15,495 | 53 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.9 / 100 | 212.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | $2.46B | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.6% | 182 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | $16,112 | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | 206.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | $2.59B | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | $16,874 | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 194.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | $2.83B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.2% | 139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | $18,298 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 194.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | $2.87B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.5% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $18,400 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 208.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | $2.95B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | $18,797 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 197.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | $2.93B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | $18,479 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 176.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | $3.01B | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.3% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | $18,726 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 177.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | $3.03B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.6% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | $18,598 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 173.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | $3.06B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -0.6% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | $18,539 | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 170.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | $3.06B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | $18,359 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 180.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | $3.02B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.1% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | $18,028 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 176.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | $3.03B | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -1.3% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | $18,001 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 167.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | $3.05B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.1% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | $16,777 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 148.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | $3.03B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -3.2% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | $15,965 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 140.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | $2.53B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -18.4% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | $13,698 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 125.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | $2.74B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $14,783 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 119.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | $3.08B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.9% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | $16,592 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 129.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | $3.28B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $17,697 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 133.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | $3.56B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $19,200 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 140.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable$2.34B → $2.95B
Compound annual change: +4.7% CAGR$2.95B → $3.56B
Compound annual change: +1.4% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | $2.34B | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.19B | 162 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | $2.46B | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.24B | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | $2.59B | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.32B | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | $2.83B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.39B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | $2.87B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.37B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | $2.95B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.38B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | $2.93B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.40B | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | $3.01B | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.39B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | $3.03B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.36B | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | $3.06B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.34B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | $3.06B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.36B | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | $3.02B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.32B | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | $3.03B | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.28B | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | $3.05B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.21B | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | $3.03B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.11B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | $2.53B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.53B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | $2.74B | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.64B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | $3.08B | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.82B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | $3.28B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $2.94B | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | $3.56B | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $3.09B | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable$15,495 → $18,797
Compound annual change: +3.9% CAGR$18,797 → $19,200
Compound annual change: +0.2% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | $15,495 | 53 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.9 / 100 | 212.7 (world = 100) | $21,081 | 53 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.9 / 100 | 233.0 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2006 | $16,112 | 55 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 73.9 / 100 | 206.6 (world = 100) | $21,255 | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | 227.8 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2007 | $16,874 | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 194.3 (world = 100) | $21,612 | 54 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | 224.9 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2008 | $18,298 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 194.3 (world = 100) | $21,923 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 226.5 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2009 | $18,400 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 208.6 (world = 100) | $21,655 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 229.9 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2010 | $18,797 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 197.0 (world = 100) | $21,524 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 221.6 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2011 | $18,479 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 176.3 (world = 100) | $21,423 | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 216.2 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2012 | $18,726 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 177.1 (world = 100) | $21,040 | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 209.3 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2013 | $18,598 | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | 173.0 (world = 100) | $20,621 | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 202.1 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2014 | $18,539 | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | 170.1 (world = 100) | $20,252 | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | 194.9 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2015 | $18,359 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 180.3 (world = 100) | $20,151 | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 190.3 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2016 | $18,028 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 176.2 (world = 100) | $19,797 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | 184.1 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2017 | $18,001 | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 167.2 (world = 100) | $19,459 | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | 177.0 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2018 | $16,777 | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | 148.4 (world = 100) | $17,679 | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | 157.5 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2019 | $15,965 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 140.7 (world = 100) | $16,393 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 143.8 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2020 | $13,698 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 125.0 (world = 100) | $13,698 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 125.0 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2021 | $14,783 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 119.1 (world = 100) | $14,248 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 123.2 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2022 | $16,592 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 129.6 (world = 100) | $15,229 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 128.5 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2023 | $17,697 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 133.5 (world = 100) | $15,862 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 131.2 (world = 100) |
| Curaçao | 2024 | $19,200 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 140.4 (world = 100) | $16,655 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 135.1 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable1.6% → 0.1%
Average annual rate: +1.2%0.1% → 5.0%
Average annual rate: -0.4%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 73.5 | 69 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 67.1 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 1.6% | 182 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 0.8% | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 75.8 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 2.5% | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 1.7% | 154 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 78.1 | 75 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.3 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 2.2% | 139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 1.4% | 118 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 83.5 | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2009 | -0.5% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -1.2% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 85.0 | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 0.1% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | -0.6% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 87.3 | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 0.6% | 180 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.5% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 86.3 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2012 | -0.3% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | -1.8% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 89.0 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2013 | -0.6% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -2.0% | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 90.2 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2014 | -0.6% | 193 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.1 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | -1.8% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 91.5 | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 0.5% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -0.5% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 91.1 | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2016 | -1.1% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | -1.8% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 91.1 | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2017 | -1.3% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | -1.7% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 92.5 | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2018 | -2.1% | 202 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 3.8 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | -9.1% | 208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 94.9 | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2019 | -3.2% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | -7.3% | 207 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.4 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 97.4 | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2020 | -18.4% | 196 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 6.7 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | -16.4% | 192 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 4.2% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 4.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 103.8 | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 6.9% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 6.9% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 108.9 | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 4.2% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 4.2% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 111.6 | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 5.0% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 5.0% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 115.3 | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable80.1% → 91.6%
Percentage-point change: +11.6 pp91.6% → 80.4%
Percentage-point change: -11.3 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | 80.1% | 105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 64.0% | 108 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 16.1% | 93 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 115.9% | 53 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 74.8 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 83.2% | 86 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 67.2% | 86 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 16.0% | 87 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 118.1% | 48 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 77.2 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 85.7% | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 68.9% | 83 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 16.8% | 77 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 63.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 124.8% | 34 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | +25.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 84.2% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 68.0% | 88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 16.2% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 128.2% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +28.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | 89.3% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 72.5% | 75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 16.7% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 124.7% | 27 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +25.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 91.6% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | 75.1% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 16.6% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 133.9% | 16 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +34.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 89.2% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | 73.4% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 15.8% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 127.0% | 24 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 88.9 / 100 | +27.9 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | 89.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | 73.4% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +16.8 pp vs world | 16.0% | 106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 121.6% | 41 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +22.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | 87.3% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world | 73.2% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world | 14.2% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 117.8% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | 86.7% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 71.0% | 73 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 15.7% | 113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 112.5% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 85.0% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 69.2% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 15.7% | 118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 111.3% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | 84.4% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 68.4% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 16.1% | 109 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 113.1% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | 91.7% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +18.3 pp vs world | 74.7% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 17.0% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 120.6% | 31 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | 91.9% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | 74.7% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | 17.2% | 88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 121.4% | 33 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | 84.5% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 68.7% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 15.8% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 112.0% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | 91.3% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | +18.1 pp vs world | 74.3% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 17.0% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 120.6% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +21.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 84.3% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 68.5% | 79 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 15.8% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 111.4% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 86.2% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 70.1% | 72 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world | 16.1% | 111 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 114.0% | 62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 81.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 66.6% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 15.3% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 108.3% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 80.4% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 65.3% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 15.0% | 122 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 106.3% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable35.9% → 42.3%
Percentage-point change: +6.4 pp42.3% → 25.9%
Percentage-point change: -16.4 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | 35.9% | 20 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 90.8 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 24.9% | 68 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 11.0% | 2 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 99.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 34.9% | 23 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 25.8% | 71 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 9.1% | 4 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 98.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 39.1% | 17 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 92.2 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 28.4% | 54 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 10.8% | 3 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 44.0% | 7 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +18.6 pp vs world | 31.3% | 39 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 12.7% | 3 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 98.9 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | 35.5% | 23 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 31.7% | 29 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 3.8% | 12 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 42.3% | 12 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +17.7 pp vs world | 35.4% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 6.9% | 9 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 95.5 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 37.8% | 18 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 31.1% | 21 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 6.6% | 12 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | 32.2% | 32 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 27.0% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 5.2% | 15 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 92.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | 30.5% | 34 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 28.9% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 1.6% | 49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | 25.8% | 73 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 26.6% | 57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | -0.8% | 160 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 8.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 26.4% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 26.7% | 57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | -0.4% | 148 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | 28.6% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 30.5% | 27 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | -1.8% | 165 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 6.3 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | 28.9% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 29.3% | 38 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.2 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | -0.4% | 162 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 7.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | 29.5% | 49 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.9 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 29.9% | 37 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | -0.3% | 162 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 7.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | 27.5% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 27.9% | 42 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 80.3 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | -0.4% | 161 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 7.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | 29.3% | 47 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 29.7% | 30 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | -0.4% | 135 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 27.2% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 27.6% | 45 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 78.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | -0.4% | 157 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 8.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 27.8% | 55 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 28.2% | 44 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 79.3 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | -0.4% | 157 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 7.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 26.4% | 62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 26.8% | 48 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 77.4 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | -0.4% | 138 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 18.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 25.9% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 26.3% | 53 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | -0.4% | 130 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 20.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Curaçao is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable134.9% → 148.6%
Percentage-point change: +13.7 pp148.6% → 170.3%
Percentage-point change: +21.7 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices20 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | 59.5% | 42 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +32.5 pp vs world | 75.4% | 25 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 88.4 / 100 | +48.8 pp vs world | -15.9% | 156 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -16.3 pp vs world | 134.9% | 27 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 87.4 / 100 | +81.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 63.7% | 36 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +35.0 pp vs world | 81.7% | 23 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 89.4 / 100 | +53.6 pp vs world | -18.0% | 160 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -18.6 pp vs world | 145.3% | 20 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 90.8 / 100 | +88.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 61.4% | 41 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +31.8 pp vs world | 86.3% | 18 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 91.8 / 100 | +57.4 pp vs world | -24.8% | 173 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 16.9 / 100 | -25.6 pp vs world | 147.7% | 19 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 91.3 / 100 | +89.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 70.4% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +39.5 pp vs world | 99.1% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +68.9 pp vs world | -28.7% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -29.4 pp vs world | 169.5% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +108.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | 61.8% | 29 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.6 / 100 | +35.5 pp vs world | 86.1% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +60.5 pp vs world | -24.3% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -25.0 pp vs world | 147.9% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +96.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 57.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +28.6 pp vs world | 91.4% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +63.8 pp vs world | -34.3% | 195 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -35.2 pp vs world | 148.6% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +92.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 73.0% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +42.6 pp vs world | 99.9% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +70.5 pp vs world | -27.0% | 188 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.5 / 100 | -27.9 pp vs world | 172.9% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +113.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | 80.8% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +50.6 pp vs world | 102.4% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +73.3 pp vs world | -21.6% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -22.6 pp vs world | 183.2% | 11 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 95.2 / 100 | +123.9 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | 74.3% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +44.2 pp vs world | 92.1% | 12 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.7 / 100 | +63.0 pp vs world | -17.8% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -18.8 pp vs world | 166.4% | 14 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +107.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | 75.9% | 24 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.0 / 100 | +46.2 pp vs world | 88.4% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +59.5 pp vs world | -12.5% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 164.4% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +105.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 68.5% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +40.4 pp vs world | 79.8% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +52.3 pp vs world | -11.3% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world | 148.3% | 21 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.4 / 100 | +92.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | 63.0% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +35.8 pp vs world | 76.1% | 22 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.0 / 100 | +49.7 pp vs world | -13.1% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world | 139.1% | 23 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 89.5 / 100 | +85.5 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | 59.5% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | 80.1% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +52.7 pp vs world | -20.6% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -21.3 pp vs world | 139.6% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +84.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | 67.8% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +38.7 pp vs world | 89.2% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +60.9 pp vs world | -21.4% | 179 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -22.2 pp vs world | 156.9% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +99.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | 64.0% | 36 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +35.9 pp vs world | 76.0% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +48.5 pp vs world | -12.0% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 140.0% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +84.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | 46.2% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 66.9% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +41.5 pp vs world | -20.6% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -21.3 pp vs world | 113.1% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +61.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 58.2% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +29.6 pp vs world | 69.7% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +42.0 pp vs world | -11.4% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world | 127.9% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +71.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 79.9% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +49.0 pp vs world | 93.9% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +63.8 pp vs world | -14.0% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 173.8% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +112.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 75.9% | 27 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +46.8 pp vs world | 84.2% | 20 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +55.9 pp vs world | -8.3% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 160.1% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +102.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 82.0% | 19 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.4 / 100 | +53.0 pp vs world | 88.3% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +60.2 pp vs world | -6.3% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 170.3% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +113.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 58.8%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 0.08×
World specialization: 0.43×
World specialization: 0.91×
World specialization: 1.14×
World specialization: 1.03×
World specialization: 1.32×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable61.4% → 57.9%
Percentage-point change: -3.5 pp57.9% → 58.8%
Percentage-point change: +0.9 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table20 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | 0.6% | 192 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 6.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 10.9% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world | 5.9% | 88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 15.3% | 99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 8.3% | 123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 61.4% | 5 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 98.1 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 0.6% | 193 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 5.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 12.3% | 159 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 5.3% | 121 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 14.8% | 108 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 9.3% | 98 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 59.8% | 6 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +16.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 0.6% | 190 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 12.0% | 160 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 5.9% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 14.5% | 117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 8.6% | 120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 60.0% | 6 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 0.6% | 190 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 10.1% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 6.3% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 16.9% | 77 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 10.4% | 62 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 56.8% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +13.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | 0.5% | 195 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 12.2% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 5.8% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 15.4% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 9.3% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 57.4% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 0.4% | 195 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 9.7% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | 6.0% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 15.1% | 104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 11.0% | 50 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 57.9% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +14.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 0.3% | 197 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 10.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -14.3 pp vs world | 5.3% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 14.4% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 10.6% | 54 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 59.4% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | 0.2% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 10.8% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 4.6% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 14.4% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 10.2% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 59.8% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +16.6 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | 0.3% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 12.2% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 5.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 13.4% | 136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 10.5% | 57 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 58.5% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | 0.2% | 199 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 14.1% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 4.3% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 12.9% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 11.8% | 32 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 85.1 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 56.6% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 0.2% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 14.9% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 3.8% | 173 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 13.4% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 11.6% | 43 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 79.8 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 56.1% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | 0.2% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 15.4% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 4.1% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 13.3% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 10.3% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 56.7% | 13 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | 0.2% | 201 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 13.2% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 4.3% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 13.9% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 8.9% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 59.4% | 7 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | 0.2% | 200 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 12.2% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 4.1% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 12.5% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 9.7% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 61.2% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | 0.3% | 198 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 11.3% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 3.9% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 11.9% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 9.3% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 63.4% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | 0.3% | 199 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 3.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 9.4% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | 4.3% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 11.4% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 8.6% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 66.0% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +20.4 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 0.3% | 198 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.4 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 9.1% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world | 4.2% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 13.3% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 8.9% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 64.2% | 6 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 97.6 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 0.3% | 197 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 8.7% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -14.1 pp vs world | 4.5% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 15.2% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 9.3% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 62.0% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 0.3% | 196 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 5.3 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 8.8% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 4.9% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 15.6% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 9.6% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 60.7% | 8 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.7 / 100 | +16.7 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 0.3% | 197 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 4.9 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 9.1% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | 5.2% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 16.5% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 10.0% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 58.8% | 9 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 96.2 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 3.4% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Curaçao was 12.2 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 3.4%
- World specialization
- 0.22×
- Latest year
- 2024
Unavailable
Change: Unavailable6.4% → 6.3%
Percentage-point change: -0.0 pp6.3% → 3.4%
Percentage-point change: -2.9 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table20 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 20 of 20 rows
| Curaçao | 2005 | 6.4% | 164 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 58.3% | 137 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | -15.7 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2006 | 8.2% | 143 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 66.9% | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 29.1% | 7 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 97.1 / 100 | +22.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2007 | 8.0% | 145 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 66.6% | 122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | -1.6% | 173 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 165 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 20.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2008 | 7.0% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 69.5% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | -9.8% | 196 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2009 | 8.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 65.2% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 12.5% | 18 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 91.9 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2010 | 6.3% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 65.4% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | -19.9% | 206 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.9 / 100 | -28.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 168 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2011 | 8.4% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 84.3% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 32.5% | 2 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 99.5 / 100 | +28.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2012 | 8.4% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 77.8% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | -0.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2013 | 9.1% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 74.9% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2014 | 9.1% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 64.7% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | -0.2% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2015 | 9.7% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 65.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2016 | 10.5% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 68.4% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 6.7% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2017 | 10.0% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 75.5% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | -6.5% | 190 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 165 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2018 | 7.0% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 57.6% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -17.4 pp vs world | -30.9% | 209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -34.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 170 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2019 | 5.8% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 51.3% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -24.2 pp vs world | -20.6% | 208 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 1.0 / 100 | -22.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2020 | 3.2% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -13.1 pp vs world | 33.7% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -43.9 pp vs world | -55.7% | 209 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 0.5 / 100 | -53.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 183 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2021 | 3.0% | 185 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | 33.7% | 175 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.7 / 100 | -41.8 pp vs world | -0.9% | 177 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 182 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2022 | 3.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world | 33.9% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -38.0 pp vs world | 2.0% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2023 | 3.2% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -12.8 pp vs world | 36.2% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -37.2 pp vs world | 12.8% | 16 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.8 / 100 | +11.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 184 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 12.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Curaçao | 2024 | 3.4% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | 37.7% | 169 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 19.6 / 100 | -36.4 pp vs world | 13.0% | 15 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 93.3 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization