Source-specific country analysis
Costa Rica Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | $1.26B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $684 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 73.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | $1.38B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.8% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | $728 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 72.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | $1.58B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | $816 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | $1.95B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.7% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $982 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 72.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | $2.13B | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | $1,043 | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 69.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | $2.50B | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.1% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $1,196 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | $3.08B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $1,434 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 82.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | $3.92B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.9% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | $1,779 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 92.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | $4.50B | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 6.3% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $1,986 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 88.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | $5.15B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.9% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $2,214 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 87.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | $6.17B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.8% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $2,580 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 92.5 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | $3.35B | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -2.3% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | $1,363 | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | 48.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | $3.33B | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | -7.3% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | $1,318 | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | 48.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | $4.02B | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.9% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | $1,548 | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | 56.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | $4.67B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | $1,752 | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | 63.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | $5.01B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.7% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | $1,826 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 65.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | $5.62B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | $1,996 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 62.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | $5.79B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.8% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $2,000 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 56.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | $5.89B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | $1,984 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 51.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | $6.67B | 76 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.7% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $2,192 | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | 55.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 76 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | $7.29B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.6% | 92 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $2,335 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 53.8 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | $7.20B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 2.3% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $2,247 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 50.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | $8.56B | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 9.2% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | $2,608 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 55.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | $9.58B | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.1% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | $2,846 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 60.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | $10.49B | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.5% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $3,039 | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 61.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | $11.57B | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $3,273 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 60.2 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | $11.68B | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 1.4% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | $3,227 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 58.9 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | $12.61B | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 5.5% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $3,408 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 63.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | $13.68B | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.2% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | $3,617 | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | 68.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | $14.25B | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | $3,691 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 68.3 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | $15.01B | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.9% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $3,813 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 69.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | $15.98B | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $3,985 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 74.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | $16.58B | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 3.4% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $4,068 | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 73.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | $17.27B | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.3% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | $4,173 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 68.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | $18.61B | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | $4,431 | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | 65.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | $20.04B | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | $4,704 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 64.6 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | $22.71B | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 7.3% | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $5,256 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 67.4 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | $26.88B | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 8.2% | 51 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 75.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | $6,138 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 70.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | $30.80B | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | $6,937 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 73.7 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | $30.75B | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -0.9% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $6,833 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 77.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | $37.66B | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 5.4% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | $8,266 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 86.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | $42.76B | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.4% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $9,276 | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 88.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | $47.23B | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.9% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | $10,127 | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 95.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | $50.95B | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.5% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | $10,803 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 100.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | $52.02B | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.5% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $10,911 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 100.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | $56.44B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $11,715 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 115.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | $58.85B | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $12,091 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 118.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | $60.52B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $12,317 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 114.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | $62.42B | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | $12,590 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 111.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | $64.42B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.4% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | $12,885 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 113.5 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | $62.40B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -4.3% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | $12,394 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 113.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | $64.96B | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 7.9% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $12,838 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 103.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | $69.24B | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.6% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $13,626 | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 106.4 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | $86.50B | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 5.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | $16,942 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 127.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | $95.35B | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 4.3% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | $18,587 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 135.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$1.26B → $7.29B
Compound annual change: +9.2% CAGR$7.29B → $37.66B
Compound annual change: +8.6% CAGR$37.66B → $95.35B
Compound annual change: +6.9% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | $1.26B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $8.69B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | $1.38B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $9.27B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | $1.58B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.03B | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | $1.95B | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $10.81B | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | $2.13B | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.41B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | $2.50B | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $11.65B | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | $3.08B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $12.29B | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | $3.92B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $13.38B | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | $4.50B | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $14.22B | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | $5.15B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $14.92B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | $6.17B | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $15.03B | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | $3.35B | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $14.70B | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | $3.33B | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $13.62B | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | $4.02B | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $14.01B | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | $4.67B | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $15.14B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | $5.01B | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $15.25B | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | $5.62B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $16.09B | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | $5.79B | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $16.86B | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | $5.89B | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $17.44B | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | $6.67B | 76 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $18.43B | 71 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 76 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | $7.29B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $19.08B | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | $7.20B | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $19.51B | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | $8.56B | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $21.31B | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | $9.58B | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $22.82B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | $10.49B | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $23.85B | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | $11.57B | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $24.84B | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | $11.68B | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $25.18B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | $12.61B | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $26.56B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | $13.68B | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $28.46B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | $14.25B | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $29.66B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | $15.01B | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $30.80B | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | $15.98B | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $31.88B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | $16.58B | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $32.97B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | $17.27B | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $34.39B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | $18.61B | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $35.91B | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | $20.04B | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $37.34B | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | $22.71B | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $40.08B | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | $26.88B | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $43.37B | 79 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | $30.80B | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 0.0 (world = 100) | $45.42B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | $30.75B | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $45.03B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | $37.66B | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $47.44B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | $42.76B | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $49.53B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | $47.23B | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $51.95B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | $50.95B | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $53.24B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | $52.02B | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $55.13B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | $56.44B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $57.14B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | $58.85B | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $59.54B | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | $60.52B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $62.02B | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | $62.42B | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $63.64B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | $64.42B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $65.18B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | $62.40B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $62.40B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | $64.96B | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $67.35B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | $69.24B | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $70.41B | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | $86.50B | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $74.01B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | $95.35B | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $77.21B | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$684 → $2,335
Compound annual change: +6.3% CAGR$2,335 → $8,266
Compound annual change: +6.5% CAGR$8,266 → $18,587
Compound annual change: +6.0% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | $684 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 73.6 (world = 100) | $4,723 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 91.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | $728 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 72.7 (world = 100) | $4,910 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 92.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | $816 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.2 (world = 100) | $5,176 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 94.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | $982 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 72.8 (world = 100) | $5,434 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 95.1 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | $1,043 | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 69.6 (world = 100) | $5,592 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 97.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | $1,196 | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | 72.7 (world = 100) | $5,565 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 98.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | $1,434 | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | 82.1 (world = 100) | $5,721 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 97.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | $1,779 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 92.0 (world = 100) | $6,069 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 101.3 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | $1,986 | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | 88.2 (world = 100) | $6,279 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 102.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | $2,214 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 87.0 (world = 100) | $6,414 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 102.1 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | $2,580 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 92.5 (world = 100) | $6,289 | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | 100.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | $1,363 | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | 48.7 (world = 100) | $5,982 | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 95.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | $1,318 | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | 48.3 (world = 100) | $5,396 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 86.9 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | $1,548 | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | 56.3 (world = 100) | $5,400 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 86.1 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | $1,752 | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | 63.1 (world = 100) | $5,675 | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 88.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | $1,826 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 65.2 (world = 100) | $5,561 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 84.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | $1,996 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 62.9 (world = 100) | $5,712 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 86.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | $2,000 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 56.8 (world = 100) | $5,828 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 86.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | $1,984 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 51.3 (world = 100) | $5,875 | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | 84.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | $2,192 | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | 55.2 (world = 100) | $6,053 | 72 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | 85.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | $2,335 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 53.8 (world = 100) | $6,112 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 85.4 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | $2,247 | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | 50.2 (world = 100) | $6,093 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 85.5 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | $2,608 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 55.3 (world = 100) | $6,488 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 90.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | $2,846 | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 60.1 (world = 100) | $6,777 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 94.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | $3,039 | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 61.1 (world = 100) | $6,911 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 94.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | $3,273 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 60.2 (world = 100) | $7,027 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 94.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | $3,227 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 58.9 (world = 100) | $6,957 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 92.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | $3,408 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 63.4 (world = 100) | $7,174 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 92.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | $3,617 | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | 68.6 (world = 100) | $7,522 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | $3,691 | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | 68.3 (world = 100) | $7,678 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 95.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | $3,813 | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | 69.4 (world = 100) | $7,822 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 94.5 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | $3,985 | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | 74.0 (world = 100) | $7,952 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 95.4 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | $4,068 | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | 73.6 (world = 100) | $8,089 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 96.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | $4,173 | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | 68.1 (world = 100) | $8,309 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 97.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | $4,431 | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | 65.1 (world = 100) | $8,550 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 97.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | $4,704 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 64.6 (world = 100) | $8,763 | 78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.8 / 100 | 96.9 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | $5,256 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 67.4 (world = 100) | $9,274 | 78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.8 / 100 | 99.4 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | $6,138 | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | 70.7 (world = 100) | $9,901 | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | 103.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | $6,937 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 73.7 (world = 100) | $10,230 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 105.7 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | $6,833 | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | 77.5 (world = 100) | $10,006 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 106.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | $8,266 | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | 86.6 (world = 100) | $10,413 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 107.2 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | $9,276 | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 88.5 (world = 100) | $10,744 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 108.5 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | $10,127 | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 95.8 (world = 100) | $11,138 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 110.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | $10,803 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 100.5 (world = 100) | $11,289 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 110.6 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | $10,911 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | 100.1 (world = 100) | $11,564 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 111.3 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | $11,715 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 115.0 (world = 100) | $11,860 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 112.0 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | $12,091 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 118.2 (world = 100) | $12,234 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 113.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | $12,317 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 114.4 (world = 100) | $12,623 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 114.8 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | $12,590 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 111.4 (world = 100) | $12,837 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 114.3 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | $12,885 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 113.5 (world = 100) | $13,037 | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | 114.3 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | $12,394 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 113.1 (world = 100) | $12,394 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 113.1 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | $12,838 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 103.4 (world = 100) | $13,310 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 115.1 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | $13,626 | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | 106.4 (world = 100) | $13,856 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 116.9 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | $16,942 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 127.8 (world = 100) | $14,496 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 119.9 (world = 100) |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | $18,587 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 135.9 (world = 100) | $15,051 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 122.1 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
6.8% → 3.6%
Average annual rate: +4.1%3.6% → 5.4%
Average annual rate: +4.6%5.4% → 4.3%
Average annual rate: +3.7%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.2 | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 6.8% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 4.0% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.2 | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 8.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 5.4% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 0.2 | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 7.7% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 5.0% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.2 | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 5.6% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 2.9% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 0.3 | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 2.1% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | -0.5% | 99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.3 | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 5.5% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 2.8% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 0.4 | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 8.9% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 6.1% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 0.4 | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 6.3% | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 3.5% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 0.5 | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 4.9% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 2.1% | 97 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 0.5 | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 0.8% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | -2.0% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 0.6 | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | -2.3% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | -4.9% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 0.8 | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | -7.3% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -9.8% | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 1.6 | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 2.9% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 0.1% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 2.0 | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 8.0% | 23 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.6 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 5.1% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 2.4 | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 0.7% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | -2.0% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 2.8 | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 5.5% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 3.3 | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 4.8% | 63 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 3.7 | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 3.4% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.8% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 4.4 | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 5.7% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 3.0% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 5.0 | 137 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 3.6% | 92 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 1.0% | 97 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 46.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 6.0 | 147 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 2.3% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | -0.3% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 7.7 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 9.2% | 26 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 87.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 6.5% | 30 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 9.2 | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 7.1% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 10.2 | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 4.5% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 2.0% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 11.8 | 159 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 4.2% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 1.7% | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 14.3 | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 1.4% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | -1.0% | 175 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 16.5 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 5.5% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 3.1% | 96 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 18.9 | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 7.2% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 4.9% | 51 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 21.1 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 4.2% | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 2.1% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 23.5 | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 3.9% | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 1.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 25.7 | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 3.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 1.7% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 28.2 | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 3.4% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 30.9 | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 4.3% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 2.7% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 34.2 | 155 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 4.4% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 2.9% | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 38.8 | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 4.0% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 2.5% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 43.9 | 151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 7.3% | 61 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 5.8% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 49.5 | 147 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 8.2% | 51 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 75.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 6.8% | 57 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 54.8 | 139 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 4.7% | 87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 3.3% | 82 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.9 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 61.0 | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | -0.9% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | -2.2% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 66.9 | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 5.4% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 4.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 71.4 | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 4.4% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 3.2% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 74.6 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 4.9% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 3.7% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 78.2 | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 2.5% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 1.4% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 81.8 | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 3.5% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 2.4% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 86.8 | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 3.7% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 2.6% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 90.3 | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 4.2% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 3.2% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 92.0 | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 4.2% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 3.2% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 94.7 | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 2.6% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 1.7% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 96.7 | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 2.4% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 1.6% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 99.2 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | -4.3% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | -4.9% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 7.9% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 7.4% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 102.4 | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 4.6% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 4.1% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 108.8 | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 5.1% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 4.6% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 108.7 | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 4.3% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 3.8% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 108.8 | 189 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 10.0 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
100.5% → 90.1%
Percentage-point change: -10.4 pp90.1% → 82.0%
Percentage-point change: -8.1 pp82.0% → 78.6%
Percentage-point change: -3.4 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | 100.5% | 21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +27.8 pp vs world | 90.3% | 11 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 94.3 / 100 | +33.3 pp vs world | 10.2% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 115.5% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 99.7% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +26.7 pp vs world | 88.4% | 16 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 91.5 / 100 | +31.4 pp vs world | 11.3% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 117.5% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 97.5% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +24.6 pp vs world | 85.8% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +29.0 pp vs world | 11.7% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 113.6% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 94.9% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +23.2 pp vs world | 83.5% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +27.6 pp vs world | 11.3% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 112.4% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 102.3% | 22 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.1 / 100 | +30.5 pp vs world | 90.7% | 13 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 93.2 / 100 | +35.0 pp vs world | 11.6% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 121.9% | 25 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.4 / 100 | +21.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 100.2% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | 87.8% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +31.2 pp vs world | 12.4% | 117 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 116.0% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 94.4% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | 81.3% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +25.2 pp vs world | 13.0% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 111.7% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 93.0% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +20.1 pp vs world | 80.0% | 32 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +23.8 pp vs world | 13.0% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 110.7% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 96.5% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 82.9% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +26.9 pp vs world | 13.7% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 113.7% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 96.7% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +24.1 pp vs world | 82.0% | 31 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.0 / 100 | +26.0 pp vs world | 14.7% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 115.2% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +14.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 95.2% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +22.0 pp vs world | 80.4% | 36 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.1 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | 14.8% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 114.6% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | 86.5% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 73.7% | 54 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 12.8% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 107.8% | 82 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.0 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | 82.8% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 70.9% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 11.8% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 100.8% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 87.6% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 75.4% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 12.3% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 105.3% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 87.8% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 75.1% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 12.7% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 104.4% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 86.5% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world | 73.7% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 12.8% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 105.5% | 73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 84.3% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 71.8% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 12.5% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 102.8% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 88.2% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 76.0% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world | 12.2% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 108.1% | 58 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 88.4% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 75.6% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +17.8 pp vs world | 12.7% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 106.3% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 87.8% | 55 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 74.0% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world | 13.8% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 107.2% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 90.1% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world | 75.3% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 14.8% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 110.2% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 86.2% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 73.0% | 68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +14.9 pp vs world | 13.2% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 104.6% | 86 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 85.1% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 73.0% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 12.1% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 105.5% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 86.2% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +10.7 pp vs world | 73.5% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +14.7 pp vs world | 12.8% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 107.3% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 85.5% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 72.2% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 13.3% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 106.2% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 84.0% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 71.0% | 71 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 12.9% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 103.5% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 86.3% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 73.2% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 13.1% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 104.0% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 84.3% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 71.7% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 12.6% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 104.4% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 81.5% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 68.7% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 12.7% | 143 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.4 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 104.1% | 112 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 81.3% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 68.1% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 13.3% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 102.4% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 80.0% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 66.2% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 13.7% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 100.7% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 79.7% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 65.4% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 14.3% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 99.8% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 82.1% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 67.4% | 88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 14.7% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 102.0% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 83.0% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 68.5% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 14.5% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 102.0% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 81.9% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 67.9% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 14.0% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 100.8% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 83.3% | 89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.5 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 69.8% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 13.5% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 102.3% | 115 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 82.1% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 68.9% | 81 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 13.2% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 103.2% | 106 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 82.0% | 89 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.5 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 69.2% | 82 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 60.7 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 12.8% | 133 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 105.3% | 99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 84.2% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 70.6% | 80 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | 13.6% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 108.8% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | 82.0% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 66.3% | 95 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 15.7% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 100.5% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 82.0% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 65.4% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 16.6% | 97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 101.9% | 118 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 83.6% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | 66.7% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 17.0% | 93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 103.7% | 108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 83.9% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 67.1% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 16.8% | 97 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 103.7% | 108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 83.3% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 66.2% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world | 17.1% | 96 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 102.9% | 110 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 47.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 83.2% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 66.2% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 17.0% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 102.5% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 81.9% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 64.9% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 17.0% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 100.8% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 80.8% | 99 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 64.1% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 16.7% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 99.7% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 81.5% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 65.1% | 95 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 16.4% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 99.5% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 81.1% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 64.9% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 16.2% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 99.5% | 135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 81.0% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 64.3% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 16.8% | 103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 97.1% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | 80.2% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 62.5% | 112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 17.7% | 106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 96.3% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 79.8% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 63.3% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 16.5% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 98.4% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 79.7% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 64.3% | 101 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 15.4% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 97.4% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 79.4% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 64.5% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 14.9% | 126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 94.6% | 163 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.1 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 78.6% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 63.9% | 103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 14.7% | 127 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 94.3% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
15.0% → 20.1%
Percentage-point change: +5.1 pp20.1% → 19.8%
Percentage-point change: -0.2 pp19.8% → 15.7%
Percentage-point change: -4.2 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | 15.0% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -12.7 pp vs world | 16.8% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | -1.8% | 128 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 6.6 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 17.8% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 19.1% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | -1.3% | 123 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 10.3 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 16.1% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 18.9% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | -2.8% | 129 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 6.6 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 17.6% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 19.1% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | -1.6% | 125 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 10.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 19.6% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 20.7% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | -1.2% | 124 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 15.8% | 141 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 19.0% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | -3.1% | 131 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 6.5 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 17.3% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 20.2% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | -2.9% | 132 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 17.8% | 135 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world | 19.3% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | -1.5% | 129 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 17.2% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | 19.9% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | -2.7% | 129 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 7.2 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 18.5% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 22.6% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | -4.0% | 131 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 7.8 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 19.4% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 20.6% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | -1.2% | 128 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 10.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | 21.2% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 20.7% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 93 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 35.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | 18.1% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 17.5% | 140 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world | 0.5% | 81 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 17.7% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 15.5% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 2.2% | 30 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 16.6% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 17.3% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | -0.7% | 125 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 15.1 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 18.9% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 16.7% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world | 2.3% | 36 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 76.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 18.4% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 16.1% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -8.8 pp vs world | 2.3% | 27 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 19.8% | 108 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 17.1% | 122 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 27 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 82.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 17.9% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -8.4 pp vs world | 16.3% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 1.6% | 54 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 19.5% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 17.7% | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 1.8% | 44 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 71.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 20.1% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 19.3% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 0.8% | 93 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 18.4% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 17.0% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 1.4% | 65 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 62.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 20.4% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 19.4% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 1.1% | 68 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 59.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 21.0% | 106 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 20.4% | 108 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 0.6% | 80 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 53.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 20.8% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 20.0% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 0.8% | 93 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 19.5% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 19.8% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 144 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 17.8% | 159 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 18.0% | 152 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | -0.2% | 139 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 20.1% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 19.3% | 132 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 0.8% | 85 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 50.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 22.7% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 22.1% | 105 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.5% | 95 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 21.1% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 21.1% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -0.0% | 117 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 20.7% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 19.7% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 1.0% | 76 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 20.1% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 19.8% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 114 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 19.9% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 19.8% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 0.1% | 126 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 19.0% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 19.8% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | -0.8% | 161 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 7.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 18.9% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 19.9% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -0.9% | 163 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 8.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 19.0% | 152 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 20.0% | 132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | -1.0% | 171 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 21.1% | 139 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 20.3% | 139 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 96 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 23.3% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 22.4% | 126 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.3 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 0.9% | 92 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 24.6% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 23.7% | 104 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.9% | 96 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | 18.5% | 162 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 22.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 21.0% | 129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | -2.6% | 169 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 19.8% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 19.5% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.4% | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 20.0% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 19.4% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 0.6% | 108 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 19.9% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 20.0% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | -0.2% | 142 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 19.6% | 144 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 31.3 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 19.8% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | -0.2% | 149 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 19.2% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 19.8% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | -0.6% | 155 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 18.9% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 19.0% | 154 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | -0.1% | 144 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 18.9% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 18.8% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 18.1% | 167 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.2 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 18.2% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | -0.1% | 148 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 15.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 18.4% | 168 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 18.2% | 157 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 138 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 21.3 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 16.1% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 16.3% | 173 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 17.3 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | -0.2% | 153 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 12.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | 16.2% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 16.2% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | -0.0% | 120 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 30.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 18.6% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 16.9% | 166 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 20.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 1.7% | 58 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 17.7% | 165 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.2 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 17.0% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 0.7% | 100 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 41.4 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 15.3% | 184 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 12.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 16.2% | 174 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.8 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | -0.9% | 152 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 10.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 15.7% | 177 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 15.4 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 15.8% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | -0.2% | 120 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Costa Rica is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
57.8% → 69.7%
Percentage-point change: +12.0 pp69.7% → 67.5%
Percentage-point change: -2.2 pp67.5% → 71.3%
Percentage-point change: +3.8 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | 24.3% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 33.5% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | -9.2% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 57.8% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +35.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 23.4% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 36.0% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | +24.6 pp vs world | -12.6% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -12.6 pp vs world | 59.3% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +36.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 26.3% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 35.5% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +23.9 pp vs world | -9.1% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -9.3 pp vs world | 61.8% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +38.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 26.8% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +13.6 pp vs world | 35.7% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +22.8 pp vs world | -8.9% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -9.1 pp vs world | 62.6% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | +36.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 28.9% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | 46.6% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +30.6 pp vs world | -17.7% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -17.8 pp vs world | 75.5% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +43.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 26.2% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 37.4% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | -11.1% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -11.2 pp vs world | 63.6% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +33.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 25.2% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 33.8% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | -8.6% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 59.0% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +27.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 26.9% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 35.2% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | -8.3% | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 62.1% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 24.6% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 34.9% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | -10.3% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 59.5% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +28.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 23.5% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 36.0% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | -12.6% | 131 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 59.5% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +25.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 23.1% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 35.7% | 92 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +17.1 pp vs world | -12.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -12.3 pp vs world | 58.8% | 110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 38.4 / 100 | +21.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | 37.7% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +19.7 pp vs world | 46.7% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +28.3 pp vs world | -9.0% | 104 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.8 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 84.4% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +48.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | 39.3% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world | 40.9% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +23.5 pp vs world | -1.6% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 80.2% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +45.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 31.4% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world | 35.6% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | -4.2% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 67.1% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +33.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 30.0% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 32.9% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +15.8 pp vs world | -2.9% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 62.9% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +28.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 26.8% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 31.5% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world | -4.7% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 58.2% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +25.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 27.3% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 29.5% | 101 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world | -2.2% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 56.9% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +25.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 27.6% | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 34.7% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | -7.1% | 116 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 62.2% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +29.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 29.7% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +12.7 pp vs world | 34.7% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | -5.0% | 107 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 64.4% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +30.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 30.4% | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +12.9 pp vs world | 37.5% | 77 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.3 / 100 | +19.8 pp vs world | -7.2% | 120 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 67.9% | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +32.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 29.8% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +10.8 pp vs world | 39.9% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +20.8 pp vs world | -10.1% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 69.7% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +31.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 33.4% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world | 38.0% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | -4.6% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 71.4% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +34.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 35.3% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 40.8% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +21.4 pp vs world | -5.5% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 76.1% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +36.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 36.0% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +17.2 pp vs world | 43.3% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +25.0 pp vs world | -7.3% | 126 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 79.4% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +42.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 35.9% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world | 42.1% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +23.1 pp vs world | -6.2% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -6.7 pp vs world | 78.0% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +39.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 38.1% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +17.5 pp vs world | 41.6% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +21.5 pp vs world | -3.5% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 79.8% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +39.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 40.0% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | 44.0% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | -4.0% | 105 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 84.1% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +42.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 41.6% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +19.6 pp vs world | 46.0% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +24.5 pp vs world | -4.4% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 87.6% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +44.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 44.0% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +22.2 pp vs world | 48.1% | 82 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +26.6 pp vs world | -4.1% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 92.0% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +48.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 42.6% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +20.7 pp vs world | 45.0% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | +23.4 pp vs world | -2.4% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 87.5% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +44.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 42.9% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +19.4 pp vs world | 43.6% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +20.2 pp vs world | -0.7% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 86.5% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +39.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 40.5% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | 40.3% | 106 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 80.9% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +35.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 39.2% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +16.0 pp vs world | 41.2% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +18.2 pp vs world | -2.0% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 80.4% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +34.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 40.7% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +16.7 pp vs world | 42.7% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +18.9 pp vs world | -2.0% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 83.3% | 92 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 42.2% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 43.0% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +17.6 pp vs world | -0.8% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 85.3% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +34.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 43.5% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world | 45.8% | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +19.1 pp vs world | -2.3% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 89.2% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +35.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 43.3% | 84 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +14.6 pp vs world | 46.5% | 95 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world | -3.2% | 99 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | 89.8% | 87 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +33.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 40.6% | 90 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 57.0 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 45.9% | 97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +17.0 pp vs world | -5.3% | 103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 86.5% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +28.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 38.8% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 47.6% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +17.4 pp vs world | -8.8% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 86.4% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +25.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | 34.6% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | +8.4 pp vs world | 35.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | -0.5% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 69.8% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +17.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 32.8% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 34.7% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | -1.9% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 67.5% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 32.5% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 36.2% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | -3.7% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 68.6% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 31.7% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 35.4% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | -3.7% | 102 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 67.0% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 30.6% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 33.5% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | -2.9% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 64.1% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 31.4% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 33.8% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | -2.5% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 65.2% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 30.0% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 30.8% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | -0.8% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 60.8% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 31.3% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 30.9% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 0.3% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 62.2% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 32.8% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 32.3% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 65.1% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 33.7% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 33.2% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 0.5% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 66.9% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | +9.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 34.3% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 31.4% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 2.9% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 65.8% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | 31.9% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 28.2% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 3.7% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 60.1% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 36.2% | 100 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 34.6% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 1.6% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 70.8% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +14.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 42.4% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 39.8% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 2.6% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 82.2% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +21.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 38.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 33.6% | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 5.4% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 72.5% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 38.5% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | 32.8% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 5.7% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 71.3% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 50.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 0.91×
World specialization: 0.81×
World specialization: 0.73×
World specialization: 0.93×
World specialization: 1.08×
World specialization: 1.14×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
28.1% → 31.4%
Percentage-point change: +3.3 pp31.4% → 46.4%
Percentage-point change: +15.0 pp46.4% → 50.7%
Percentage-point change: +4.3 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | 16.9% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 22.4% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 5.8% | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 20.4% | 44 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 6.5% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 28.1% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 15.3% | 93 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 23.0% | 77 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 6.5% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 20.4% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 6.8% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 27.9% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 15.1% | 95 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 23.5% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 7.1% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 19.8% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 6.8% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 27.8% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 15.2% | 89 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 24.4% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 6.8% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 20.3% | 39 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 6.6% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 26.6% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 14.6% | 92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 25.1% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 7.2% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 20.4% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 25.9% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 15.3% | 89 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world | 25.0% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 7.1% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 18.5% | 48 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 73.3 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 7.2% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 26.8% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 15.4% | 88 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 24.5% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 7.9% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 18.1% | 59 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 7.2% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 26.9% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 16.8% | 79 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +9.0 pp vs world | 24.0% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 7.2% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 19.3% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 6.5% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 26.3% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 15.6% | 81 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 54.3 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 23.5% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 7.7% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 19.5% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 6.6% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 27.0% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 14.2% | 89 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 23.0% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 8.9% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 20.2% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 6.6% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 27.2% | 100 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 13.6% | 88 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 23.6% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 8.7% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 19.8% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 6.6% | 97 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 27.6% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | 17.8% | 64 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 64.0 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 24.6% | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 7.3% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 18.3% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 7.1% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 25.0% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | 19.0% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 26.2% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 4.4% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 21.7% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 7.3% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 21.4% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -13.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 16.9% | 66 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 29.1% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 4.1% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 19.6% | 38 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 7.7% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 22.6% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 16.2% | 71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 29.4% | 45 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 5.0% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 19.2% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 7.6% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 22.6% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 14.3% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 28.5% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 4.9% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 20.1% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 7.7% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 24.5% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | -12.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 15.9% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world | 27.5% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 4.6% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 18.9% | 49 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 7.4% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 25.7% | 118 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.9 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 13.6% | 84 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.6 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 27.2% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 4.4% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 20.0% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 7.6% | 94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 27.2% | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 13.5% | 85 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 27.1% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 4.1% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 19.6% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 7.7% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 28.0% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -10.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 13.0% | 89 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +7.6 pp vs world | 26.2% | 66 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 63.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 4.7% | 108 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 19.0% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world | 7.6% | 91 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.2 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 29.6% | 95 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 11.9% | 113 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 44.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 25.0% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 4.4% | 133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 19.5% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 7.8% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 31.4% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 13.0% | 104 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 25.9% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 3.9% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 19.5% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 8.0% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 29.8% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 13.1% | 101 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 26.4% | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 4.2% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 19.5% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 7.7% | 107 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 29.2% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 12.9% | 97 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 25.3% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 4.5% | 136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 19.3% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 7.6% | 113 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 30.5% | 109 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.3 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 13.4% | 91 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 24.4% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 4.6% | 133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 18.1% | 61 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 7.3% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 32.2% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 13.9% | 87 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 24.3% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 4.8% | 137 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 17.5% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 7.1% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 32.5% | 102 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 13.3% | 88 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 24.7% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 3.8% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 17.4% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 6.9% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 33.9% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 13.7% | 88 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 24.7% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 3.9% | 157 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 17.3% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 6.7% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 33.8% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 13.8% | 87 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world | 24.1% | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 4.3% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 17.3% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 161 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 34.5% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 12.2% | 92 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 55.2 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | 24.1% | 80 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 4.2% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 16.7% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 5.8% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 37.1% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 10.2% | 99 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 24.0% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 4.1% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 16.4% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 6.2% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 39.1% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 9.3% | 100 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 23.4% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 4.5% | 134 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 16.2% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 6.5% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 40.1% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 9.3% | 98 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 23.0% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 4.2% | 146 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 15.6% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 6.9% | 148 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 41.0% | 61 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 9.7% | 98 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 22.6% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 4.1% | 151 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 15.5% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 7.3% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 40.8% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 9.7% | 97 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 22.5% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 4.6% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 15.3% | 100 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 7.4% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 40.4% | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 9.5% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 22.3% | 92 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 4.4% | 143 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 15.3% | 101 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 7.6% | 141 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 40.8% | 66 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 9.3% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 21.5% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 4.8% | 141 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 15.5% | 99 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 7.9% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 41.0% | 63 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 8.8% | 95 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 20.8% | 100 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 5.8% | 105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 15.7% | 94 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 7.8% | 142 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 41.1% | 62 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 7.8% | 100 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 19.7% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 6.5% | 87 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 15.8% | 102 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 7.7% | 141 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 42.5% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | 7.7% | 102 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 19.2% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 6.5% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 13.8% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 7.2% | 156 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 45.6% | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 7.1% | 107 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 48.5 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 19.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 6.1% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.5% | 136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 7.6% | 142 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 46.4% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 6.1% | 113 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.6 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 18.8% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 5.9% | 97 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 13.6% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 7.9% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 47.6% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +4.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 5.6% | 114 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 18.5% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 5.8% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 13.2% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 8.0% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 49.0% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 5.2% | 121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 17.7% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 5.6% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 13.3% | 138 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 8.1% | 129 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 50.1% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 5.3% | 117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 16.9% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 5.6% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 13.4% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 8.6% | 116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 50.2% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 5.2% | 117 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 43.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 16.0% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 5.7% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 13.5% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 9.1% | 107 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 50.6% | 33 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 5.3% | 121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 16.0% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 5.3% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 13.3% | 147 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 9.2% | 107 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 50.8% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 5.1% | 120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 15.9% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 5.0% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 9.7% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 50.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 4.8% | 121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 16.1% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 5.0% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 13.6% | 137 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 9.6% | 82 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 50.9% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 4.5% | 123 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 16.3% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 4.5% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 13.5% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 9.6% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 51.7% | 28 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 87.1 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | 4.7% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 17.4% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 4.5% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 11.9% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 9.1% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 52.4% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 4.7% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 18.1% | 121 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 4.3% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 12.8% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 9.3% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 50.7% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 4.5% | 124 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 18.4% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 4.1% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 13.4% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 10.1% | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 49.6% | 30 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 86.1 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 4.1% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 17.8% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 4.3% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 13.5% | 139 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 10.3% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 49.9% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 3.9% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 17.2% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 4.2% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 13.4% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 10.6% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 50.7% | 31 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.6 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 14.1% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Costa Rica was 1.6 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 14.1%
- World specialization
- 0.90×
- Latest year
- 2024
20.6% → 21.8%
Percentage-point change: +1.2 pp21.8% → 15.9%
Percentage-point change: -5.9 pp15.9% → 14.1%
Percentage-point change: -1.8 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Costa Rica | 1970 | 20.6% | 43 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 92.3% | 22 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1971 | 21.2% | 41 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 92.0% | 22 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +8.3 pp vs world | 8.1% | 47 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1972 | 21.5% | 40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 91.6% | 29 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 84.0 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 10.5% | 42 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 73 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1973 | 22.7% | 35 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 92.8% | 18 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 10.3% | 49 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 70 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1974 | 23.4% | 31 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 93.0% | 18 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.3 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 12.7% | 30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 72 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1975 | 23.0% | 34 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 91.7% | 28 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 84.6 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 3.2% | 74 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 58.3 / 100 | +6.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1976 | 22.3% | 39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 91.1% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 5.8% | 97 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 45.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 69 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.1 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1977 | 21.8% | 41 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 90.8% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 12.7% | 26 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 85.7 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 68 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1978 | 21.5% | 39 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 91.3% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 8.2% | 58 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 67.4 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 70 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1979 | 21.0% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 91.4% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world | 2.6% | 120 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1980 | 21.3% | 43 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 90.1% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +16.5 pp vs world | 0.9% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1981 | 21.9% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 89.0% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | -0.5% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1982 | 23.6% | 23 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 87.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 90.2% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +16.1 pp vs world | -11.4% | 161 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 9.1 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 77 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1983 | 25.2% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 86.4% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 1.8% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1984 | 25.8% | 17 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 87.8% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +13.2 pp vs world | 10.4% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1985 | 25.1% | 19 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 88.2% | 35 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 80.7 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world | 2.0% | 112 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1986 | 24.3% | 24 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 86.9 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 88.4% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 7.3% | 40 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 0.0% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1987 | 24.0% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 88.4% | 30 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 83.5 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 5.5% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1988 | 24.0% | 28 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 88.6% | 29 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world | 2.2% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1989 | 23.0% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 87.6% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 3.4% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1990 | 21.8% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 87.2% | 51 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 2.7% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1991 | 22.3% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 86.4% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 2.1% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 83 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1992 | 22.7% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 86.0% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +7.7 pp vs world | 9.9% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 82 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1993 | 21.4% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 84.8% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 5.1% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 0.0% | 78 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1994 | 20.8% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 85.1% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 1.8% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1995 | 20.8% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 85.6% | 48 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 3.5% | 120 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.0% | 75 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1996 | 21.0% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 85.1% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world | -0.5% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1997 | 21.3% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 86.4% | 42 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world | 7.5% | 66 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1998 | 20.7% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 86.0% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 5.9% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 1999 | 20.5% | 41 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 85.3% | 50 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 2.1% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.0% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2000 | 20.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 84.2% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 3.2% | 131 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.3 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2001 | 19.3% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 82.5% | 63 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.6 / 100 | +9.8 pp vs world | -0.6% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2002 | 19.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 83.6% | 54 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 3.5% | 103 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 70 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2003 | 18.8% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 83.4% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +11.9 pp vs world | 1.4% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.0% | 73 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2004 | 18.6% | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 82.5% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 4.0% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -15.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2005 | 18.6% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 83.3% | 52 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 75.4 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 3.6% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 0.0% | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2006 | 18.3% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 84.9% | 40 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.2 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 4.1% | 120 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 78 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 62.8 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2007 | 18.0% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 86.2% | 36 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.0% | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2008 | 16.8% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 85.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +15.4 pp vs world | -2.3% | 151 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 0.0% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2009 | 15.4% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 80.4% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | -8.0% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.0% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2010 | 15.9% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 82.2% | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 6.8% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2011 | 15.6% | 63 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 83.1% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +13.8 pp vs world | 3.8% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2012 | 15.1% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 82.0% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 4.1% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2013 | 14.0% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 79.1% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | -0.1% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2014 | 13.4% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 79.3% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 0.0% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -100.0 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2015 | 12.6% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 79.0% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | -4.1% | 178 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2016 | 12.6% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 78.7% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 4.3% | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2017 | 12.7% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 80.0% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 4.0% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2018 | 12.9% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 79.8% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 4.2% | 92 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2019 | 13.0% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 79.7% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 3.0% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2020 | 13.8% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 79.0% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 2.1% | 34 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2021 | 14.9% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 82.6% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 18.0% | 17 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 92.3 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2022 | 15.3% | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 83.3% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 3.4% | 106 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2023 | 14.8% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 82.8% | 37 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +9.4 pp vs world | 8.4% | 32 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Costa Rica | 2024 | 14.1% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 81.9% | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 5.5% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization