Source-specific country analysis
Chile Economic Overview
UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (UNSD AMA)
Three fixed historical periods
Read the economy through three eras
Every chart uses the same labeled periods. There is no page-wide selection to remember as you move between topics.
01 · Economic overview
What should a reader know first?
Latest values orient the reader; the three-era analysis below shows how the economic record developed.
Economic overview annual rank and index table55 annual rows
Annual core economic measures, world ranks and comparable world indices. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | $9.68B | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | $983 | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 105.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | $11.59B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 9.0% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | $1,158 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 115.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | $12.51B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -1.2% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | $1,230 | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 108.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | $17.83B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -5.6% | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | $1,725 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 127.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | $17.29B | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $1,645 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 109.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | $8.04B | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | -12.9% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world | $754 | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | 45.8 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | $10.98B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.5% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | $1,013 | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 58.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | $14.88B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 9.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | $1,352 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 70.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | $17.15B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | $1,535 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 68.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | $23.09B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.3% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | $2,037 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | $30.72B | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.9% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | $2,669 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | $36.83B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | $3,154 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 112.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | $26.32B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -13.6% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | $2,221 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 81.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | $21.71B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -2.8% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | $1,805 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 65.7 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | $21.52B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.9% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | $1,763 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 63.5 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | $18.98B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 2.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | $1,532 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 54.7 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | $20.31B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 5.6% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $1,613 | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | 50.9 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | $23.71B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 6.6% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $1,854 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 52.6 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | $27.68B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | 7.3% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | $2,129 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 55.0 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | $31.57B | 49 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 10.6% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | $2,389 | 77 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.3 / 100 | 60.1 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | $34.75B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.7% | 87 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $2,586 | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | 59.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | $39.71B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 8.0% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | $2,906 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 64.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | $47.99B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 12.3% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | $3,457 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 73.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | $50.96B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.0% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | $3,614 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 76.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | $58.35B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.7% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | $4,076 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 81.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | $74.73B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 10.6% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | $5,144 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | 94.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | $78.58B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 7.4% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | $5,333 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 97.4 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | $85.73B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 7.4% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | $5,741 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | 106.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | $82.00B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $5,420 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 102.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | $75.60B | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | -0.3% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | $4,935 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 91.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | $78.24B | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 5.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $5,046 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 91.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | $71.52B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | $4,560 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 84.6 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | $70.30B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 3.2% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | $4,433 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 80.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | $76.51B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 4.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | $4,774 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 78.0 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | $99.08B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 6.7% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | $6,121 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 89.9 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | $122.31B | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.8% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | $7,482 | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | 102.7 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | $153.84B | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.0% | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | $9,318 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | 119.5 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | $172.57B | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.2% | 116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | $10,351 | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | 119.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | $179.66B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 3.8% | 104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | $10,669 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 113.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | $171.41B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -1.1% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | $10,077 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 114.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | $217.11B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 5.9% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | $12,636 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 132.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | $251.22B | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | $14,478 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 138.1 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | $267.18B | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 6.2% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | $15,251 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 144.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | $277.24B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | 3.3% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | $15,675 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 145.8 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | $259.41B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | $14,521 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 133.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | $242.50B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.2% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | $13,436 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.9 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | $249.30B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.8% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | $13,647 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 133.4 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | $276.36B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 1.4% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | $14,891 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 138.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | $295.40B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 4.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | $15,635 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 138.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | $278.18B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.6% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | $14,490 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 127.7 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | $253.88B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | -6.1% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | $13,106 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 119.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | $315.46B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 11.3% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | $16,214 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 130.6 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | $301.23B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.2% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | $15,406 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 120.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | $335.52B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.5% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | $17,067 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 128.8 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | $330.27B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 2.6% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | $16,710 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 122.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The long view
Real output, indexed to a shared starting year
Indexing allows the country and benchmark trajectories to be compared without confusing their very different economic sizes.
02 · Economic size and world position
How large is the economy, and where does it sit globally?
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Full historical record
Nominal GDP
Nominal scale, real volume and share of world output provide three distinct views of economic size.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$9.68B → $34.75B
Compound annual change: +6.6% CAGR$34.75B → $217.11B
Compound annual change: +9.6% CAGR$217.11B → $330.27B
Compound annual change: +3.0% CAGREconomic size and world position: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the economic size and world position section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | $9.68B | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $41.46B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | $11.59B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $45.17B | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | $12.51B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $44.62B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | $17.83B | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $42.14B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | $17.29B | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $42.55B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | $8.04B | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $37.06B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | $10.98B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $38.36B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | $14.88B | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $42.14B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | $17.15B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $45.61B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | $23.09B | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $49.38B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | $30.72B | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $53.31B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | $36.83B | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $56.62B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | $26.32B | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $48.92B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | $21.71B | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $47.55B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | $21.52B | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $50.35B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | $18.98B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $51.34B | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | $20.31B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $54.22B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | $23.71B | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $57.79B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | $27.68B | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | 0.1 (world = 100) | $62.02B | 52 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | $31.57B | 49 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $68.57B | 50 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 49 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | $34.75B | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $71.10B | 55 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | $39.71B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $76.77B | 52 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | $47.99B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $86.19B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | $50.96B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $92.22B | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | $58.35B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $97.48B | 49 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | $74.73B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $107.84B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | $78.58B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $115.83B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | $85.73B | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $124.40B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | $82.00B | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $129.60B | 44 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | $75.60B | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $129.24B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | $78.24B | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $135.67B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | $71.52B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $139.95B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | $70.30B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $144.43B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | $76.51B | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $151.25B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | $99.08B | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | 0.2 (world = 100) | $161.35B | 46 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.2% | 47 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | $122.31B | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $170.76B | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.7 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | $153.84B | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $181.10B | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 79.2 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | $172.57B | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $190.45B | 47 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 77.8 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 46 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 78.3 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | $179.66B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $197.67B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | $171.41B | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $195.46B | 47 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | $217.11B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $206.90B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | $251.22B | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $219.78B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 40 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | $267.18B | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $233.30B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | $277.24B | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | 0.4 (world = 100) | $241.02B | 42 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 80.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.4% | 39 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | -99.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | $259.41B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $245.34B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | $242.50B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $250.62B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | $249.30B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $255.02B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | $276.36B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $258.48B | 46 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | $295.40B | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $268.79B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 43 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | $278.18B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $270.50B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | $253.88B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $253.88B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | $315.46B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $282.61B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | $301.23B | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $288.69B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 45 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | $335.52B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $290.20B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | $330.27B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | $297.87B | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | 0.3 (world = 100) | 0.3% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.7 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Current U.S.-dollar GDP reflects domestic prices and exchange rates as well as production. It is not PPP adjusted.
Latest common comparison
03 · Output and income per person
What does the record show per person?
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Full historical record
GDP per person
Current and constant-price per-person measures separate present-dollar scale from real change.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
$983 → $2,586
Compound annual change: +5.0% CAGR$2,586 → $12,636
Compound annual change: +8.3% CAGR$12,636 → $16,710
Compound annual change: +2.0% CAGROutput and income per person: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the output and income per person section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | $983 | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 105.9 (world = 100) | $4,211 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 81.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1971 | $1,158 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 115.6 (world = 100) | $4,513 | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | 85.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1972 | $1,230 | 51 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | 108.8 (world = 100) | $4,386 | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | 80.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1973 | $1,725 | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | 127.9 (world = 100) | $4,075 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 71.3 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1974 | $1,645 | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 109.8 (world = 100) | $4,050 | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | 70.7 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1975 | $754 | 105 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | 45.8 (world = 100) | $3,473 | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 61.3 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1976 | $1,013 | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | 58.0 (world = 100) | $3,539 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 60.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1977 | $1,352 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 70.0 (world = 100) | $3,829 | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 63.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1978 | $1,535 | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | 68.2 (world = 100) | $4,082 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 66.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1979 | $2,037 | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | 80.0 (world = 100) | $4,355 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 69.3 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1980 | $2,669 | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | 95.7 (world = 100) | $4,632 | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | 73.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1981 | $3,154 | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | 112.6 (world = 100) | $4,848 | 78 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | 77.0 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1982 | $2,221 | 74 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | 81.4 (world = 100) | $4,129 | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 66.5 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1983 | $1,805 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 65.7 (world = 100) | $3,954 | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 63.0 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1984 | $1,763 | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | 63.5 (world = 100) | $4,125 | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 63.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1985 | $1,532 | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | 54.7 (world = 100) | $4,142 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 63.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1986 | $1,613 | 87 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 51.4 / 100 | 50.9 (world = 100) | $4,307 | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | 64.8 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1987 | $1,854 | 85 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | 52.6 (world = 100) | $4,518 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 66.8 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1988 | $2,129 | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | 55.0 (world = 100) | $4,771 | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | 68.7 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1989 | $2,389 | 77 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.3 / 100 | 60.1 (world = 100) | $5,189 | 77 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 57.3 / 100 | 73.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1990 | $2,586 | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | 59.6 (world = 100) | $5,291 | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | 73.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1991 | $2,906 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 64.9 (world = 100) | $5,619 | 83 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | 78.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1992 | $3,457 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 73.3 (world = 100) | $6,208 | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | 86.8 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1993 | $3,614 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 76.3 (world = 100) | $6,539 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 91.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1994 | $4,076 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 81.9 (world = 100) | $6,809 | 76 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | 93.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1995 | $5,144 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | 94.6 (world = 100) | $7,423 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 100.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1996 | $5,333 | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | 97.4 (world = 100) | $7,862 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 103.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1997 | $5,741 | 65 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | 106.8 (world = 100) | $8,331 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 107.5 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1998 | $5,420 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 102.8 (world = 100) | $8,567 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 109.0 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 1999 | $4,935 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 91.3 (world = 100) | $8,437 | 72 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.4 / 100 | 105.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2000 | $5,046 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 91.9 (world = 100) | $8,751 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 105.8 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2001 | $4,560 | 75 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 63.9 / 100 | 84.6 (world = 100) | $8,923 | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | 107.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2002 | $4,433 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 80.2 (world = 100) | $9,108 | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | 108.3 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2003 | $4,774 | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | 78.0 (world = 100) | $9,439 | 69 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | 110.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2004 | $6,121 | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | 89.9 (world = 100) | $9,967 | 71 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | 113.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2005 | $7,482 | 74 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 64.7 / 100 | 102.7 (world = 100) | $10,445 | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | 115.4 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2006 | $9,318 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | 119.5 (world = 100) | $10,969 | 72 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.7 / 100 | 117.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2007 | $10,351 | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | 119.2 (world = 100) | $11,424 | 73 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | 118.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2008 | $10,669 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 113.3 (world = 100) | $11,739 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 121.3 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2009 | $10,077 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 114.2 (world = 100) | $11,491 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 122.0 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2010 | $12,636 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 132.4 (world = 100) | $12,042 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 124.0 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2011 | $14,478 | 67 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | 138.1 (world = 100) | $12,666 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 127.9 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2012 | $15,251 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 144.3 (world = 100) | $13,317 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 132.5 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2013 | $15,675 | 66 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | 145.8 (world = 100) | $13,627 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 133.5 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2014 | $14,521 | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | 133.2 (world = 100) | $13,734 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 132.2 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2015 | $13,436 | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | 131.9 (world = 100) | $13,887 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 131.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2016 | $13,647 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 133.4 (world = 100) | $13,960 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 129.8 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2017 | $14,891 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 138.3 (world = 100) | $13,928 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 126.7 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2018 | $15,635 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 138.3 (world = 100) | $14,227 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 126.7 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2019 | $14,490 | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | 127.7 (world = 100) | $14,090 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 123.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2020 | $13,106 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 119.6 (world = 100) | $13,106 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 119.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2021 | $16,214 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 130.6 (world = 100) | $14,525 | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | 125.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2022 | $15,406 | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | 120.3 (world = 100) | $14,765 | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | 124.6 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2023 | $17,067 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | 128.8 (world = 100) | $14,762 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | 122.1 (world = 100) |
| Chile | 2024 | $16,710 | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | 122.2 (world = 100) | $15,071 | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | 122.3 (world = 100) |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
GDP per person is an accounting average, not a measure of household income distribution or living costs.
Latest common comparison
04 · Real growth and output prices
How quickly has real activity changed, and how have output prices moved?
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Full historical record
Real GDP growth
Real GDP growth, per-person growth and the implicit deflator answer different questions.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
9.0% → 3.7%
Average annual rate: +3.0%3.7% → 5.9%
Average annual rate: +5.4%5.9% → 2.6%
Average annual rate: +2.9%Real growth and output prices: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the real growth and output prices section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.0 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 1971 | 9.0% | 33 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 7.2% | 27 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.3 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 0.0 | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 1972 | -1.2% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | -2.8% | 162 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.0 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 0.0 | 167 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 6.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1973 | -5.6% | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -12.0 pp vs world | -7.1% | 168 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 5.6 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | 0.0 | 161 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 9.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 1974 | 1.0% | 149 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 16.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | -0.6% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 0.0 | 152 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.7 / 100 |
| Chile | 1975 | -12.9% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -13.7 pp vs world | -14.3% | 172 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 3.4 / 100 | -13.2 pp vs world | 0.1 | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 |
| Chile | 1976 | 3.5% | 117 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 1.9% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.5 | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1977 | 9.9% | 26 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 85.9 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 8.2% | 19 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 89.8 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 1.0 | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1978 | 8.2% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 6.6% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 1.5 | 129 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.7 / 100 |
| Chile | 1979 | 8.3% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 6.7% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 2.2 | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1980 | 7.9% | 35 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.8 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 6.4% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +6.3 pp vs world | 2.8 | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1981 | 6.2% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 4.7% | 37 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.7 / 100 | +4.5 pp vs world | 3.2 | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 |
| Chile | 1982 | -13.6% | 175 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 1.7 / 100 | -14.0 pp vs world | -14.8% | 174 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 2.3 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 3.5 | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 |
| Chile | 1983 | -2.8% | 144 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.2 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | -4.2% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 4.5 | 120 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 1984 | 5.9% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 4.3% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 5.3 | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1985 | 2.0% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.4% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 7.5 | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 1986 | 5.6% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 4.0% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 9.1 | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1987 | 6.6% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 4.9% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 11.4 | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1988 | 7.3% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 5.6% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 13.8 | 111 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 |
| Chile | 1989 | 10.6% | 11 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 94.4 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world | 8.8% | 8 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 96.0 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 15.5 | 111 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 |
| Chile | 1990 | 3.7% | 87 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 2.0% | 83 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 53.9 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 18.8 | 113 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1991 | 8.0% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 6.2% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | 22.8 | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 |
| Chile | 1992 | 12.3% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 10.5% | 9 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 96.1 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 25.5 | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 |
| Chile | 1993 | 7.0% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 5.3% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 28.2 | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 1994 | 5.7% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 4.1% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 31.7 | 112 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 |
| Chile | 1995 | 10.6% | 14 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 93.7 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 9.0% | 16 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 92.7 / 100 | +7.4 pp vs world | 34.7 | 117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1996 | 7.4% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 5.9% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 35.3 | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 |
| Chile | 1997 | 7.4% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 38 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 36.5 | 119 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 1998 | 4.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 2.8% | 94 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 36.7 | 122 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 |
| Chile | 1999 | -0.3% | 166 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.5 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world | -1.5% | 170 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 17.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 37.5 | 124 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 40.0 / 100 |
| Chile | 2000 | 5.0% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 3.7% | 81 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 39.3 | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 |
| Chile | 2001 | 3.2% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 40.9 | 129 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 2002 | 3.2% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 2.1% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 42.3 | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 |
| Chile | 2003 | 4.7% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 3.6% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 44.1 | 132 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 |
| Chile | 2004 | 6.7% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 5.6% | 56 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 47.2 | 133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 2005 | 5.8% | 84 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 4.8% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 50.6 | 135 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 |
| Chile | 2006 | 6.0% | 85 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 59.4 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 5.0% | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 56.8 | 134 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 35.7 / 100 |
| Chile | 2007 | 5.2% | 116 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 4.1% | 97 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 59.7 | 132 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 |
| Chile | 2008 | 3.8% | 104 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 2.8% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 59.9 | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 |
| Chile | 2009 | -1.1% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | -2.1% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 62.0 | 147 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 |
| Chile | 2010 | 5.9% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 4.8% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 67.5 | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 |
| Chile | 2011 | 6.2% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world | 5.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 69.7 | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 2012 | 6.2% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 5.1% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 70.3 | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 2013 | 3.3% | 104 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 2.3% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 71.9 | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 2014 | 1.8% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.8% | 146 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 30.6 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 76.1 | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 |
| Chile | 2015 | 2.2% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 1.1% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 79.8 | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 2016 | 1.8% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 0.5% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 83.5 | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 2017 | 1.4% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | -0.2% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 87.5 | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 |
| Chile | 2018 | 4.0% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 2.1% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 88.9 | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 |
| Chile | 2019 | 0.6% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | -1.0% | 181 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 13.9 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 91.2 | 186 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 11.5 / 100 |
| Chile | 2020 | -6.1% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | -7.0% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 100.0 | 1 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 100.0 / 100 |
| Chile | 2021 | 11.3% | 25 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.5 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 10.8% | 26 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 88.0 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 106.9 | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 2022 | 2.2% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 1.6% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 114.9 | 85 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 |
| Chile | 2023 | 0.5% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | -0.0% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 122.5 | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 |
| Chile | 2024 | 2.6% | 125 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 2.1% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 132.0 | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
The implicit GDP deflator covers domestically produced output and is not a consumer price index. Annual growth can be volatile.
Latest common comparison
05 · Consumption and domestic demand
How is output used for consumption and domestic demand?
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Full historical record
Final Consumption
Household and government consumption sit inside final consumption; domestic demand also includes capital formation.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
82.9% → 68.5%
Percentage-point change: -14.5 pp68.5% → 69.1%
Percentage-point change: +0.7 pp69.1% → 73.2%
Percentage-point change: +4.0 ppConsumption and domestic demand: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the consumption and domestic demand section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | 82.9% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 68.3% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world | 14.6% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 99.7% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | 85.2% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +12.2 pp vs world | 68.8% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | +11.8 pp vs world | 16.5% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 99.8% | 123 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | 90.9% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world | 73.0% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world | 17.9% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 103.6% | 86 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | 92.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +21.3 pp vs world | 78.4% | 37 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +22.5 pp vs world | 14.5% | 96 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 101.1% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | 76.5% | 99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 59.2% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 17.3% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 98.1% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | 86.6% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 69.4% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world | 17.3% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 100.0% | 130 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.7 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | 80.8% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 65.4% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 15.4% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 93.9% | 151 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.8 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | 85.2% | 64 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world | 69.2% | 68 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.9 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world | 16.0% | 88 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 50.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 100.0% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | 83.5% | 73 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 67.6% | 76 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 15.9% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 101.7% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | 83.2% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 67.4% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +11.4 pp vs world | 15.7% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 101.4% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | 82.3% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 68.6% | 69 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 61.4 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world | 13.7% | 114 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 103.8% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | 87.3% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 73.0% | 57 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +16.4 pp vs world | 14.3% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 109.8% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | 90.3% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | +15.7 pp vs world | 73.0% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | +15.6 pp vs world | 17.4% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 101.6% | 116 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 34.7 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | 85.3% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +10.3 pp vs world | 69.5% | 72 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.7 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world | 15.8% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 96.7% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | 82.5% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 67.7% | 73 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 59.1 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world | 14.8% | 113 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 100.6% | 111 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | 79.1% | 96 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 65.6% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 13.5% | 118 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 96.7% | 132 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.6 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | 74.6% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 60.9% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 13.8% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 95.6% | 144 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | 71.6% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 59.7% | 110 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 11.9% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | 96.3% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | 67.2% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 55.8% | 124 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 30.1 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 11.3% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 92.5% | 152 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 14.2 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | 67.1% | 150 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world | 56.1% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 11.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 95.1% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | 68.5% | 169 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 18.0 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 57.8% | 124 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 10.7% | 162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 96.4% | 158 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | 69.8% | 167 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 19.0 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 59.2% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 10.6% | 166 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 19.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 94.8% | 168 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | 71.5% | 162 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 60.9% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 10.6% | 164 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 98.0% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | 72.6% | 160 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.4 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 61.6% | 119 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 11.0% | 162 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 102.1% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | 71.3% | 163 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 21.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 60.4% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 10.9% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 98.1% | 142 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | 69.2% | 173 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 16.1 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 58.4% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 10.8% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 97.9% | 151 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 26.5 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | 72.1% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 60.8% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 11.3% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 102.0% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | 72.5% | 164 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 20.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 61.0% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 11.4% | 154 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 102.3% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +2.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | 74.9% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 63.1% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 11.8% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 103.5% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | 75.5% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 62.9% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 12.7% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | 98.1% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | 74.7% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 62.1% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 12.6% | 141 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 98.5% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | 74.4% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 61.7% | 118 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 12.6% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 98.5% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | 73.9% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 61.1% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 12.7% | 145 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 98.0% | 139 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | 72.2% | 158 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -4.6 pp vs world | 60.0% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 12.2% | 147 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 95.6% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | 69.3% | 161 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 57.8% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 11.4% | 155 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 90.5% | 173 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.7 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | 68.4% | 160 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | 57.5% | 132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 11.0% | 166 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 19.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 91.7% | 172 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | 63.8% | 171 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 17.9 / 100 | -10.7 pp vs world | 53.5% | 155 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 25.2 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 10.3% | 165 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 20.4 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 86.0% | 174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -13.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | 64.4% | 169 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 18.8 / 100 | -9.6 pp vs world | 53.8% | 151 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 27.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 10.5% | 161 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 22.3 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 86.7% | 178 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | -12.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | 69.5% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 58.2% | 132 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 11.3% | 150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 98.4% | 149 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | 69.5% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 56.7% | 146 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 12.9% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -5.1 pp vs world | 92.5% | 175 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -7.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | 69.1% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 56.6% | 140 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.2 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 12.5% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 93.9% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | 70.5% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 58.1% | 133 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 12.3% | 151 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.9 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 97.1% | 150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | 71.7% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 59.3% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 12.3% | 152 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 100.5% | 134 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 36.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | 73.5% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 60.7% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 12.8% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 101.0% | 126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | 74.5% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 61.2% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 13.2% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 99.6% | 136 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | 75.4% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 61.8% | 115 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 13.6% | 150 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 101.0% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | 76.5% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 62.2% | 113 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.2 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 14.3% | 139 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 33.7 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 100.2% | 128 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.9 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | 76.7% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 62.1% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 14.6% | 124 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 99.4% | 130 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | 76.9% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 62.1% | 114 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 45.7 / 100 | +5.7 pp vs world | 14.9% | 117 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 101.1% | 116 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | 76.9% | 124 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 61.7% | 112 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 15.3% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 101.9% | 107 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | 74.5% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 58.4% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 16.0% | 126 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 39.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 95.5% | 171 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | 76.8% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 62.0% | 108 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 48.6 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 14.7% | 135 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 100.9% | 120 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | 78.2% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 63.5% | 106 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.5 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 14.7% | 125 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 40.4 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 104.0% | 105 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | 75.7% | 132 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 60.4% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 15.3% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 99.1% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | 73.2% | 151 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 58.1% | 131 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 37.5 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 15.1% | 121 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 42.3 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 96.4% | 148 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 29.3 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Parent aggregates and their components should not be added together. Shares describe composition, not the quality of spending.
Latest common comparison
06 · Investment and capital formation
How much current output is directed toward capital formation?
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Full historical record
Gross Capital Formation
Gross capital formation combines fixed investment and inventory change as shares of GDP.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
16.7% → 27.9%
Percentage-point change: +11.2 pp27.9% → 24.8%
Percentage-point change: -3.1 pp24.8% → 23.2%
Percentage-point change: -1.5 ppInvestment and capital formation: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the investment and capital formation section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | 16.7% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | 17.9% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | -1.2% | 125 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 8.8 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | 14.5% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -12.9 pp vs world | 16.6% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | -2.1% | 130 of 137 · highest-to-lowest | 5.1 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | 12.7% | 149 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.9 / 100 | -14.7 pp vs world | 15.5% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -10.9 pp vs world | -2.8% | 130 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | 8.1% | 165 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 6.8 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world | 15.0% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -12.2 pp vs world | -6.9% | 136 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 2.9 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | 21.7% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world | 19.9% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world | 1.8% | 81 of 138 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | 13.4% | 153 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 13.6 / 100 | -13.4 pp vs world | 20.7% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | -7.3% | 137 of 140 · highest-to-lowest | 2.2 / 100 | -7.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | 13.1% | 155 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 12.5 / 100 | -14.9 pp vs world | 15.5% | 137 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.7 / 100 | -11.3 pp vs world | -2.5% | 131 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 5.8 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | 14.8% | 150 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -13.5 pp vs world | 15.6% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -11.6 pp vs world | -0.8% | 122 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 12.3 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | 18.2% | 134 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 17.2% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world | 1.0% | 70 of 139 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | 18.2% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -10.1 pp vs world | 17.5% | 139 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 91 of 142 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | 21.5% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 19.5% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -7.6 pp vs world | 2.0% | 55 of 143 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | 22.6% | 109 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 38.6 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 21.5% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 1.0% | 72 of 144 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | 11.3% | 164 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 7.4 / 100 | -15.0 pp vs world | 16.4% | 145 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | -5.2% | 141 of 145 · highest-to-lowest | 2.8 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | 11.4% | 163 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 8.0 / 100 | -14.4 pp vs world | 14.6% | 147 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 17.0 / 100 | -11.0 pp vs world | -3.2% | 134 of 146 · highest-to-lowest | 8.3 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | 18.1% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -8.3 pp vs world | 16.4% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world | 1.7% | 46 of 147 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | 17.7% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -8.0 pp vs world | 17.9% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 117 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | 21.0% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -4.4 pp vs world | 19.2% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 1.8% | 37 of 148 · highest-to-lowest | 75.5 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | 24.7% | 62 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 21.8% | 93 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.7 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 3.0% | 22 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 86.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | 25.3% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 22.7% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 2.6% | 31 of 151 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | 28.0% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 26.4% | 48 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 73.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 1.6% | 54 of 152 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | 27.9% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 25.9% | 59 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 2.0% | 53 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | 25.1% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 22.3% | 91 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 2.7% | 46 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | 26.5% | 62 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 25.1% | 57 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 1.3% | 62 of 167 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | 29.5% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 27.9% | 39 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 1.5% | 54 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | 26.8% | 56 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.0 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 26.1% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 0.7% | 95 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 44.4 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | 28.7% | 40 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 80.9 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 26.7% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 1.9% | 56 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | 29.9% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 27.9% | 37 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.4 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 2.0% | 48 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 72.4 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | 29.9% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world | 28.6% | 38 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 81.9 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 1.2% | 63 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 63.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | 28.6% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 27.6% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 1.0% | 65 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | 22.6% | 101 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 22.4% | 98 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.5 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 99 of 168 · highest-to-lowest | 41.3 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | 23.8% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 22.0% | 89 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 1.7% | 51 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 70.4 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | 24.1% | 80 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 61.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 22.5% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 1.6% | 50 of 172 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | 24.1% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 22.3% | 85 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 58.8 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 1.8% | 43 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 75.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | 23.4% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 22.1% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 1.3% | 53 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | 21.2% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 21.4% | 102 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 50.5 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | 23.3% | 101 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 51.5 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 23.4% | 85 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 59.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | -0.1% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | 22.2% | 128 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 21.1% | 129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 1.1% | 75 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 58.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | 22.3% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 22.0% | 133 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 124 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | 28.9% | 69 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 26.9% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 2.0% | 58 of 180 · highest-to-lowest | 68.2 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | 22.9% | 100 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 24.1% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | -1.2% | 144 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 19.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | 24.8% | 83 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.6 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 23.0% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 1.8% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | 26.6% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 24.7% | 68 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 1.9% | 48 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | 28.8% | 51 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 76.0 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 26.8% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 2.0% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | 27.5% | 58 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.6 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 26.3% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 1.1% | 62 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | 25.2% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 25.5% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | -0.3% | 152 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 13.2 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | 25.6% | 71 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 25.5% | 67 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.1% | 122 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | 23.7% | 94 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.3 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 24.1% | 81 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 61.5 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | -0.4% | 148 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | 22.6% | 107 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 49.0 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 22.3% | 103 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 51.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 0.4% | 115 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | 24.2% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 23.0% | 89 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 1.2% | 71 of 175 · highest-to-lowest | 59.8 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | 24.9% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 24.5% | 74 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 0.4% | 104 of 174 · highest-to-lowest | 40.5 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | 21.1% | 119 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 43.3 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 22.6% | 93 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 55.8 / 100 | -3.4 pp vs world | -1.5% | 158 of 173 · highest-to-lowest | 8.7 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | 24.1% | 95 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 23.3% | 91 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 0.8% | 95 of 171 · highest-to-lowest | 44.7 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | 25.8% | 84 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 60.1 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 25.6% | 60 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 139 of 170 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | 23.4% | 99 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 24.2% | 78 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 63.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | -0.9% | 149 of 169 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | 23.2% | 98 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 23.5% | 88 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | -0.2% | 124 of 163 · highest-to-lowest | 24.1 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
A larger investment share is not automatically better; depreciation, utilization and project quality are outside this accounting measure.
Latest common comparison
07 · Trade structure and external balance
How exposed is the economy to trade, and what is the external balance?
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Full historical record
Trade openness
Exports, imports, openness and net exports distinguish exposure from surplus or deficit.
Chile is shown against compatible UN benchmarks. The three fixed eras are labeled on the chart and summarized below.
27.8% → 59.8%
Percentage-point change: +32.0 pp59.8% → 69.7%
Percentage-point change: +9.9 pp69.7% → 63.9%
Percentage-point change: -5.9 ppTrade structure and external balance: annual rates, ranks and comparison indices55 annual rows
Annual non-duplicative measures used in the trade structure and external balance section. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | 14.4% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 13.4% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | +2.1 pp vs world | 1.0% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 27.8% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | 10.4% | 151 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.3 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 11.8% | 160 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.2 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | -1.4% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 22.2% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | 9.7% | 155 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 13.0 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 12.8% | 159 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 10.7 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | -3.2% | 98 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 45.2 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 22.5% | 157 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 11.9 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | 13.1% | 146 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.1 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 14.9% | 150 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 15.8 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | -1.7% | 84 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.1 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 28.0% | 153 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 14.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | 19.2% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 18.5% | 145 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 18.6 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 0.7% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 37.7% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | 24.0% | 99 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 25.7% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | -1.8% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 49.7% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +19.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | 23.6% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 19.5% | 143 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 4.1% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 43.1% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +11.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | 19.4% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 21.0% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | -1.6% | 72 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 59.9 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 40.4% | 135 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.3 / 100 | +8.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | 19.4% | 122 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 22.4% | 133 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | -3.1% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 41.8% | 130 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 27.1 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | 21.9% | 113 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.7 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world | 24.5% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | -2.6% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 46.4% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | +12.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | 21.5% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | 25.3% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | -3.8% | 81 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.8 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 46.8% | 126 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.4 / 100 | +9.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | 15.3% | 141 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 20.9 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 24.8% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | -9.5% | 109 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.0 / 100 | -9.2 pp vs world | 40.0% | 139 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | 18.8% | 121 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 20.5% | 140 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 21.5 / 100 | +3.2 pp vs world | -1.8% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 39.3% | 134 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | +5.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | 23.0% | 106 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 20.3% | 137 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 23.2 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 2.8% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 43.3% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +10.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | 21.8% | 114 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 36.2 / 100 | +4.9 pp vs world | 22.6% | 128 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.2 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | -0.8% | 70 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.0 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 44.4% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +10.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | 25.7% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 22.8% | 127 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 28.8 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 2.8% | 40 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 48.5% | 124 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 30.5 / 100 | +15.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | 26.4% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world | 23.6% | 123 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 2.9% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 50.0% | 112 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | +18.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | 27.5% | 88 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.8 / 100 | +11.0 pp vs world | 24.8% | 119 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 2.7% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 52.3% | 110 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 38.4 / 100 | +19.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | 31.4% | 76 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +14.4 pp vs world | 25.0% | 125 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | +7.8 pp vs world | 6.4% | 21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 56.4% | 102 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +22.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | 32.6% | 78 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 56.7 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 28.3% | 106 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 41.0 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 4.3% | 31 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 83.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 60.9% | 94 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +25.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | 31.4% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 28.4% | 125 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 3.1% | 42 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 59.8% | 116 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.9 / 100 | +21.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | 30.1% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | +11.5 pp vs world | 26.0% | 133 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 4.2% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 56.1% | 117 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 43.4 / 100 | +18.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | 27.8% | 101 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | +8.1 pp vs world | 26.5% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 1.3% | 59 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.7 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 54.3% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +15.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | 25.0% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 27.1% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world | -2.1% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 52.1% | 140 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.2 / 100 | +15.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | 26.6% | 111 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.3 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 25.3% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | +6.4 pp vs world | 1.3% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 51.9% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | 27.7% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | +7.1 pp vs world | 26.0% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 1.7% | 54 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 53.8% | 142 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.2 / 100 | +13.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | 26.0% | 121 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 28.0% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | -2.0% | 91 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.1 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 53.9% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | +12.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | 25.9% | 130 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 37.1 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world | 28.2% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world | -2.3% | 85 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 59.0 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 54.1% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | 25.1% | 127 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.5 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 28.7% | 149 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | -3.5% | 86 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.5 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 53.8% | 143 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.7 / 100 | +10.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | 28.3% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | +6.5 pp vs world | 26.4% | 154 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 1.9% | 58 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 54.7% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | +11.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | 30.1% | 120 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | +6.6 pp vs world | 28.6% | 152 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 1.5% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 58.7% | 148 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 28.3 / 100 | +11.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | 31.8% | 110 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 46.8 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 30.3% | 145 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 29.8 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 1.5% | 63 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 69.8 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 62.1% | 135 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.6 / 100 | +16.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | 32.3% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +9.1 pp vs world | 30.2% | 141 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 31.7 / 100 | +7.2 pp vs world | 2.0% | 66 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 68.3 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 62.5% | 136 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 34.1 / 100 | +16.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | 35.1% | 97 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 53.2 / 100 | +11.1 pp vs world | 30.6% | 139 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 32.7 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 4.4% | 50 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 65.7% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +18.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | 39.7% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +13.9 pp vs world | 30.2% | 144 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 30.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 9.5% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +9.2 pp vs world | 69.9% | 128 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 38.0 / 100 | +18.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | 40.2% | 93 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 55.6 / 100 | +13.1 pp vs world | 31.9% | 144 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 8.3% | 40 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.2 / 100 | +7.9 pp vs world | 72.1% | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | +18.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | 43.9% | 83 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 60.4 / 100 | +15.1 pp vs world | 29.8% | 157 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 24.6 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 14.0% | 34 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 84.1 / 100 | +13.4 pp vs world | 73.7% | 125 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 40.1 / 100 | +16.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | 45.1% | 77 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +15.5 pp vs world | 31.8% | 153 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 26.6 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 13.3% | 31 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 85.5 / 100 | +12.5 pp vs world | 77.0% | 122 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | +18.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | 41.2% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +10.2 pp vs world | 39.5% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 1.6% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 80.7% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +19.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | 37.1% | 88 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 58.4 / 100 | +10.9 pp vs world | 29.6% | 154 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.8 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | 7.5% | 35 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 83.7 / 100 | +6.9 pp vs world | 66.7% | 127 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.7 / 100 | +14.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | 37.9% | 96 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 31.8% | 148 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | +4.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 69.7% | 131 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 37.8 / 100 | +13.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | 37.7% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 34.8% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 2.9% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 72.5% | 135 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | +12.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | 33.8% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 34.3% | 138 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.4 / 100 | +5.1 pp vs world | -0.5% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 68.2% | 140 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +8.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | 32.1% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 33.1% | 143 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.1 / 100 | +4.0 pp vs world | -1.0% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 65.1% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | 33.0% | 110 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 32.6% | 149 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 29.2 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 0.4% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 65.6% | 136 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | 29.2% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 30.2% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | -1.0% | 83 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 59.3% | 145 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.1 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | 27.9% | 133 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 28.1% | 163 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | -0.2% | 82 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.2 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 56.1% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | 28.3% | 137 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 34.9 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 27.7% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 0.6% | 78 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 56.0% | 156 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.8 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | 28.5% | 144 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 31.6 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 29.6% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | -1.1% | 95 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 58.2% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | 27.9% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 29.7% | 161 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | -1.9% | 103 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 51.2 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world | 57.6% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | 31.3% | 98 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 53.6 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 26.9% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 4.5% | 38 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 58.2% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | +6.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | 32.0% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 32.9% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | -0.9% | 90 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 64.9% | 134 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | +8.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | 35.6% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 39.6% | 126 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 40.2 / 100 | +9.5 pp vs world | -4.0% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 75.2% | 128 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | +14.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | 30.8% | 129 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 29.9% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 0.9% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 60.7% | 153 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | 33.7% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 30.1% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 3.6% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 63.9% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +6.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Trade openness is exports plus imports relative to GDP. Imports are positive in the source but subtracted in the expenditure identity.
Latest common comparison
08 · Industry mix and structural change
Which activities produce value, and how is the mix changing?
Six mutually exclusive activities show the production structure. Manufacturing remains nested inside its parent activity.
Full historical record
Structural change across six activities
Other activities is the largest current activity at 41.7%. Each activity shows change separately for 1970–1990, 1990–2010, and 2010–current.
AMA activity values measure gross value added, not sales, revenue, shipments, gross output, or physical production.
World specialization: 1.02×
World specialization: 1.28×
World specialization: 1.11×
World specialization: 0.80×
World specialization: 0.92×
World specialization: 0.94×
Industry composition and economic scale
The 100% area view isolates changes in production mix. The current-dollar area view combines those shares with nominal GDP so the total height also shows the expansion or contraction of the economy.
32.2% → 30.6%
Percentage-point change: -1.6 pp30.6% → 36.9%
Percentage-point change: +6.3 pp36.9% → 41.7%
Percentage-point change: +4.8 ppWorld specialization compares an activity's share of this country's gross value added with that activity's share of world gross value added. A result of 1.00× means the shares match; above 1.00× means the activity is relatively more prominent locally, while below 1.00× means it is relatively less prominent. It describes economic structure, not productivity or competitiveness.
Current specialization against world
Industry mix, specialization and world comparison table55 annual rows
Annual shares for the six mutually exclusive broad industries, with world comparisons and ranks wherever comparable data exist. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | 5.9% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world | 32.8% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 7.7% | 56 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.9 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 14.9% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 6.6% | 95 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 32.2% | 58 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | 6.6% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 27.8% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 9.7% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world | 14.7% | 92 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 6.2% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 35.1% | 47 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.0 / 100 | +3.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | 7.1% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 27.9% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 9.2% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 15.6% | 85 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.3 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 7.8% | 70 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.8 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 32.4% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | 5.6% | 139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -3.6 pp vs world | 32.9% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 6.6% | 79 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.9 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 17.1% | 61 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 65.9 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 8.1% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 29.7% | 71 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 60.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | 4.7% | 144 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 18.3 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 39.0% | 21 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 88.7 / 100 | +7.3 pp vs world | 9.3% | 28 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.7 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 11.8% | 127 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 28.4 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 7.5% | 75 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 27.6% | 83 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 53.7 / 100 | -3.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | 5.2% | 138 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 29.4% | 50 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.3 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 7.9% | 53 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.6 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 13.9% | 101 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.2 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 7.1% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 36.5% | 42 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | +3.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | 6.9% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 32.1% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 6.4% | 86 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 12.4% | 121 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 31.8 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 6.3% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 35.9% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | 8.1% | 121 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 31.4 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 28.6% | 54 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 70.1 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 6.1% | 94 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 47.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 12.9% | 115 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 35.2 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 6.9% | 87 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 51.1 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 37.4% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | 6.2% | 132 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.1 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 27.8% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world | 6.3% | 90 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 49.7 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 13.7% | 104 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 41.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 7.0% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 39.0% | 30 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | 5.8% | 130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 29.4% | 57 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 68.4 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 6.3% | 89 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 50.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 13.5% | 99 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 6.5% | 102 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 38.6% | 34 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 81.4 / 100 | +5.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | 5.6% | 130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 27.1% | 68 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.1 / 100 | -4.0 pp vs world | 7.3% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.2% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 6.2% | 106 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 40.7% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +7.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | 4.9% | 136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 23.5% | 82 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 54.2 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 8.8% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 12.3% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 6.2% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 44.2% | 24 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 87.0 / 100 | +10.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | 4.5% | 136 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.9 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 23.9% | 80 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 7.6% | 55 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 69.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 9.5% | 148 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 16.5 / 100 | -4.7 pp vs world | 6.4% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 48.0% | 12 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 93.8 / 100 | +12.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | 4.6% | 137 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 22.3 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 30.0% | 43 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 6.5% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 11.1% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 6.7% | 98 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 44.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 41.1% | 36 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 80.2 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | 5.9% | 124 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 29.7 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 30.6% | 39 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 6.4% | 66 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 11.3% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world | 7.3% | 94 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 47.2 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 38.6% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | 5.9% | 123 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.3 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 31.3% | 38 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 79.1 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 6.0% | 67 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 11.9% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 6.8% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 38.0% | 46 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | 7.0% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 31.1% | 32 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 82.5 / 100 | +3.4 pp vs world | 6.0% | 69 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 61.6 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 12.8% | 128 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 7.3% | 100 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 43.8 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 35.9% | 65 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 63.8 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | 7.3% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 32.2% | 29 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 84.2 / 100 | +4.8 pp vs world | 6.0% | 62 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 65.5 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 14.1% | 107 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 7.0% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 33.4% | 75 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 58.2 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | 7.0% | 118 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 33.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 36.9% | 17 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 91.0 / 100 | +9.7 pp vs world | 6.4% | 59 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 12.3% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 6.9% | 105 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 40.9 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 30.5% | 93 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | 6.9% | 119 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 35.8% | 21 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +8.9 pp vs world | 6.3% | 64 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 13.2% | 115 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 35.6 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 7.5% | 95 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -0.5 pp vs world | 30.5% | 90 of 179 · highest-to-lowest | 50.0 / 100 | -8.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | 6.9% | 141 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 31.0 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 34.8% | 36 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 82.9 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 7.1% | 62 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 70.2 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 12.8% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 7.8% | 99 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 30.6% | 98 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.7 / 100 | -8.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | 7.9% | 132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 35.5 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 34.0% | 34 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 83.9 / 100 | +8.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 13.3% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 8.1% | 93 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.9 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 29.9% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | 7.9% | 128 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 37.4 / 100 | +3.6 pp vs world | 31.4% | 43 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 79.5 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 7.5% | 41 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 80.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 13.5% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 8.4% | 87 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.8 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 31.4% | 103 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -9.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | 6.9% | 136 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 28.8% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 8.7% | 23 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 89.3 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 13.8% | 110 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 46.6 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 8.5% | 94 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 54.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 33.3% | 93 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | 6.3% | 139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 29.1% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 8.5% | 28 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 13.4% | 125 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 39.2 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 8.5% | 88 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 57.4 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 34.2% | 87 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | 5.9% | 139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 29.8% | 45 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 78.5 / 100 | +5.2 pp vs world | 8.3% | 25 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.3 / 100 | +2.5 pp vs world | 14.0% | 116 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.6 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 8.2% | 92 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 33.8% | 90 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 56.6 / 100 | -8.2 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | 5.7% | 138 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 26.5% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 8.4% | 29 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 14.3% | 109 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 9.0% | 74 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 36.1% | 78 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.4 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | 5.7% | 136 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 25.1% | 68 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.3 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 8.8% | 24 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 88.8 / 100 | +3.3 pp vs world | 14.0% | 115 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.1 / 100 | -1.1 pp vs world | 9.5% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 36.9% | 74 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | 6.1% | 133 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 22.9% | 88 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.6 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 8.2% | 33 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 84.4 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 14.2% | 117 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 11.0% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 37.6% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | 6.0% | 132 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 35.5 / 100 | +2.4 pp vs world | 24.1% | 79 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.0 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 6.4% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 13.4% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 11.7% | 36 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 82.8 / 100 | +2.6 pp vs world | 38.4% | 70 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 66.3 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | 5.7% | 131 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 36.0 / 100 | +2.3 pp vs world | 26.2% | 67 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 67.8 / 100 | +2.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 104 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 12.9% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 11.9% | 34 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.8 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 38.0% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | 4.6% | 137 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 26.6% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +4.1 pp vs world | 5.5% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 12.7% | 136 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.8 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world | 12.3% | 35 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 83.3 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 38.3% | 73 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 64.9 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | 4.6% | 139 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 32.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 26.8% | 60 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +4.7 pp vs world | 5.2% | 108 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 12.3% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 13.1% | 29 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.3 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 38.0% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | 4.6% | 135 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 34.0 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 27.7% | 53 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 5.5% | 95 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 54.1 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 12.1% | 153 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 25.5 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 13.6% | 23 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 89.2 / 100 | +4.3 pp vs world | 36.5% | 89 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 57.1 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | 4.2% | 140 of 204 · highest-to-lowest | 31.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 31.2% | 39 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 81.5 / 100 | +8.7 pp vs world | 5.1% | 118 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 42.9 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 11.5% | 163 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -3.1 pp vs world | 13.0% | 28 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 86.8 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 34.9% | 99 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -9.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | 4.4% | 134 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.8 / 100 | +1.0 pp vs world | 32.4% | 39 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 81.6 / 100 | +9.3 pp vs world | 5.4% | 117 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 11.5% | 162 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 21.8 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 12.2% | 38 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 82.0 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 34.2% | 105 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 49.8 / 100 | -10.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | 4.1% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 37.5% | 29 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 86.5 / 100 | +14.0 pp vs world | 5.1% | 130 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 10.7% | 176 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 15.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 10.7% | 53 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 74.8 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 32.0% | 118 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -11.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | 3.9% | 137 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 33.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 36.0% | 35 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 83.6 / 100 | +12.4 pp vs world | 5.4% | 123 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 41.1 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 11.0% | 174 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 16.0 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 10.5% | 55 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 73.8 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 33.2% | 109 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 47.8 / 100 | -10.4 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | 3.8% | 140 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 28.7% | 59 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 6.9% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 12.6% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 11.5% | 36 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 83.2 / 100 | +2.2 pp vs world | 36.5% | 89 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 57.9 / 100 | -6.6 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | 4.1% | 135 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.0 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 28.3% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +6.0 pp vs world | 6.7% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 12.1% | 164 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 21.6 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 10.6% | 59 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 38.2% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | -6.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | 3.8% | 136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 31.2% | 44 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | +7.5 pp vs world | 5.7% | 109 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 11.9% | 161 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.1 / 100 | -2.1 pp vs world | 10.5% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 36.9% | 101 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 52.2 / 100 | -6.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | 4.0% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 29.8% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 6.0% | 93 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.0 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 12.1% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 9.8% | 75 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 64.4 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 38.2% | 94 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 55.5 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | 3.6% | 138 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 33.5 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 27.2% | 60 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 6.7% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 12.3% | 158 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.5 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 10.3% | 65 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 39.9% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | -3.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | 3.9% | 134 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.4 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 25.7% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +1.9 pp vs world | 7.0% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 12.1% | 159 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 24.0 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 10.4% | 61 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 71.2 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 41.0% | 75 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.6 / 100 | -2.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | 4.4% | 129 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 37.9 / 100 | -0.0 pp vs world | 25.3% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | +2.0 pp vs world | 6.8% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 12.4% | 160 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 23.6 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world | 10.3% | 66 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 68.8 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 40.8% | 80 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.2 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | 4.1% | 132 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 36.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 23.8% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 7.2% | 61 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 71.3 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 12.6% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 10.8% | 56 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 73.6 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 41.4% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | 4.7% | 127 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.8 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 22.5% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 7.3% | 55 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 12.9% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 10.5% | 64 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 69.7 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 42.1% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | -2.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | 4.8% | 124 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 23.6% | 71 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 6.8% | 69 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.5 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 12.9% | 155 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 10.0% | 70 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 66.8 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 41.9% | 72 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 66.0 / 100 | -2.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | 4.4% | 124 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 40.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 23.8% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 7.2% | 64 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.9 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 12.7% | 153 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 26.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 9.4% | 92 of 209 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 42.5% | 68 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.9 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | 4.4% | 125 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 39.8 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 22.6% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 7.5% | 57 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.2 / 100 | +1.7 pp vs world | 12.4% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -1.9 pp vs world | 9.5% | 91 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 56.9 / 100 | +0.0 pp vs world | 43.6% | 62 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 70.8 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | 4.5% | 128 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -0.1 pp vs world | 26.4% | 54 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 74.6 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 6.6% | 81 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 61.7 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 11.3% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 8.3% | 114 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.9 / 100 | -1.0 pp vs world | 42.8% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | 3.9% | 133 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 35.9 / 100 | -0.6 pp vs world | 28.1% | 53 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.1 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 6.4% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 12.7% | 142 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 32.5 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 8.3% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 40.6% | 86 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 59.3 / 100 | -3.5 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | 3.6% | 136 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 34.5 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 28.1% | 56 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 73.7 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 6.5% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +0.9 pp vs world | 12.1% | 159 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 8.2% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 41.5% | 70 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 67.0 / 100 | -1.7 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | 3.9% | 128 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 25.4% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | +3.7 pp vs world | 6.6% | 77 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | +0.8 pp vs world | 12.5% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 8.9% | 108 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 48.8 / 100 | -0.7 pp vs world | 42.7% | 65 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 69.4 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | 4.3% | 121 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 41.7 / 100 | +0.1 pp vs world | 27.0% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 6.4% | 84 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 60.3 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 11.6% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 9.0% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -0.8 pp vs world | 41.7% | 73 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.6 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
09 · Manufacturing position
What role does manufacturing play at home and in the world?
Domestic share, its place inside the parent industry, real growth, specialization and world contribution are kept together.
Full historical record
Manufacturing in the economic structure
Manufacturing accounts for 10.0% of total gross value added in 2024. In 2024, Chile was 5.7 percentage points below the world value.
- Latest share
- 10.0%
- World specialization
- 0.64×
- Latest year
- 2024
18.9% → 19.2%
Percentage-point change: +0.4 pp19.2% → 10.9%
Percentage-point change: -8.3 pp10.9% → 10.0%
Percentage-point change: -0.9 ppManufacturing annual rates, ranks and specialization table55 annual rows
Manufacturing's annual structural, growth and world-position measures. Annual rows cover the full 1970–2024 AMA record wherever the source publishes a value. World ranks run highest-to-lowest. The position index converts rank to a 0–100 scale: 100 is first and 0 is last; it is not a performance score. World comparison is either a world-equals-100 value index or a percentage-point gap, according to the measure.
Showing 55 of 55 rows
| Chile | 1970 | 18.9% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 57.6% | 135 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -26.5 pp vs world | Source observation unavailable | Not calculable without a source observation | Not calculable without a source observation | Comparable world observation unavailable | 0.2% | 32 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 82.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1971 | 18.3% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 65.7% | 122 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 30.9 / 100 | -18.0 pp vs world | 13.6% | 17 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 90.9 / 100 | +10.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 33 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 81.7 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1972 | 17.6% | 66 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | -7.9 pp vs world | 63.2% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -20.5 pp vs world | 2.2% | 130 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 36 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1973 | 20.4% | 52 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 70.9 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 62.0% | 127 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.0 / 100 | -21.1 pp vs world | -7.7% | 169 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 4.0 / 100 | -16.7 pp vs world | 0.2% | 30 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 83.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1974 | 22.1% | 40 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 77.7 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 56.8% | 128 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 27.4 / 100 | -22.5 pp vs world | -2.6% | 154 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 12.6 / 100 | -3.9 pp vs world | 0.2% | 35 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 80.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1975 | 14.5% | 85 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 52.0 / 100 | -9.8 pp vs world | 49.2% | 139 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -29.9 pp vs world | -25.5% | 174 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 1.1 / 100 | -22.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 57 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 68.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1976 | 17.0% | 71 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 60.0 / 100 | -7.4 pp vs world | 52.8% | 135 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 23.4 / 100 | -26.0 pp vs world | 6.0% | 92 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 48.0 / 100 | -1.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 71.4 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1977 | 16.0% | 79 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 55.4 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 56.0% | 131 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 25.7 / 100 | -22.4 pp vs world | 8.5% | 50 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 72.0 / 100 | +4.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1978 | 16.4% | 75 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 57.7 / 100 | -7.7 pp vs world | 58.9% | 126 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 28.6 / 100 | -20.1 pp vs world | 9.3% | 48 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 73.1 / 100 | +5.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 46 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 74.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1979 | 15.2% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | -8.6 pp vs world | 51.8% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -25.4 pp vs world | 7.9% | 65 of 176 · highest-to-lowest | 63.4 / 100 | +3.8 pp vs world | 0.1% | 45 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1980 | 14.8% | 83 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 53.4 / 100 | -8.1 pp vs world | 54.6% | 125 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.5 / 100 | -19.0 pp vs world | 6.2% | 67 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 62.5 / 100 | +5.9 pp vs world | 0.2% | 42 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 76.7 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1981 | 15.0% | 84 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 52.8 / 100 | -7.5 pp vs world | 63.6% | 120 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 32.4 / 100 | -9.9 pp vs world | 2.6% | 90 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 49.4 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 41 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 77.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1982 | 12.6% | 91 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 48.9 / 100 | -9.5 pp vs world | 52.6% | 133 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 25.0 / 100 | -21.4 pp vs world | -21.0% | 176 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 0.6 / 100 | -19.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 50 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 72.2 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1983 | 14.6% | 79 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.7 / 100 | -7.1 pp vs world | 48.9% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -25.2 pp vs world | 3.1% | 78 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 56.3 / 100 | +1.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 53 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 70.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1984 | 17.0% | 71 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 60.2 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 55.5% | 126 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 29.0 / 100 | -19.1 pp vs world | 8.9% | 46 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 74.4 / 100 | +3.5 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1985 | 15.7% | 80 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 55.1 / 100 | -6.1 pp vs world | 50.1% | 138 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 22.2 / 100 | -25.5 pp vs world | 2.7% | 103 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 42.0 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 55 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 69.3 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1986 | 18.2% | 65 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 63.6 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 58.6% | 129 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 27.3 / 100 | -20.6 pp vs world | 7.6% | 34 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.3 / 100 | +5.6 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1987 | 18.0% | 64 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 64.2 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 56.0% | 131 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 26.1 / 100 | -23.4 pp vs world | 5.3% | 81 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 54.5 / 100 | +0.7 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1988 | 18.6% | 60 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 66.5 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 50.3% | 136 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 23.3 / 100 | -29.8 pp vs world | 8.8% | 33 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 81.8 / 100 | +3.1 pp vs world | 0.1% | 51 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 71.6 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1989 | 18.5% | 60 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | -2.9 pp vs world | 51.9% | 132 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 26.0 / 100 | -27.9 pp vs world | 11.0% | 27 of 177 · highest-to-lowest | 85.2 / 100 | +8.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 72.9 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1990 | 19.2% | 72 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 65.2 / 100 | -1.6 pp vs world | 55.3% | 157 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 23.5 / 100 | -23.1 pp vs world | 1.0% | 108 of 178 · highest-to-lowest | 39.5 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 0.1% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1991 | 20.2% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 59.4% | 150 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.0 / 100 | -19.3 pp vs world | 5.3% | 55 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 73.5 / 100 | +5.3 pp vs world | 0.1% | 49 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 76.5 / 100 | -99.9 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1992 | 20.2% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +0.4 pp vs world | 64.4% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | 11.4% | 30 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 85.8 / 100 | +12.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 45 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1993 | 19.7% | 53 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 74.5 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 68.5% | 130 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 36.8 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 5.6% | 52 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 75.0 / 100 | +6.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1994 | 18.8% | 64 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 69.1 / 100 | -0.4 pp vs world | 64.5% | 140 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 31.9 / 100 | -13.8 pp vs world | -0.6% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -4.1 pp vs world | 0.2% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1995 | 18.2% | 67 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.6 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 61.2% | 144 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 29.9 / 100 | -16.8 pp vs world | 3.4% | 121 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 41.2 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1996 | 17.2% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 65.0% | 133 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 35.3 / 100 | -11.5 pp vs world | -2.2% | 174 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 15.2 / 100 | -4.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1997 | 16.8% | 76 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 63.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 67.0% | 129 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.3 / 100 | -9.0 pp vs world | 5.2% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | +0.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1998 | 16.4% | 77 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | -1.3 pp vs world | 71.8% | 114 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 44.6 / 100 | -5.0 pp vs world | -0.5% | 146 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 28.9 / 100 | -1.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 1999 | 16.6% | 69 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 66.7 / 100 | -0.9 pp vs world | 68.7% | 122 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 40.7 / 100 | -7.2 pp vs world | 0.3% | 149 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 27.5 / 100 | -3.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 43 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 79.4 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2000 | 17.2% | 68 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 67.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 65.4% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -8.5 pp vs world | 6.1% | 90 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 56.4 / 100 | -0.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2001 | 18.0% | 60 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 71.1 / 100 | +1.6 pp vs world | 67.4% | 126 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.7 / 100 | -5.2 pp vs world | 0.7% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | +1.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 44 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 78.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2002 | 17.7% | 58 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 72.1 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 66.2% | 128 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 37.7 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 1.5% | 135 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 34.3 / 100 | +0.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 46 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.9 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2003 | 17.0% | 65 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 68.6 / 100 | +1.1 pp vs world | 61.2% | 138 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 32.8 / 100 | -10.3 pp vs world | 2.0% | 127 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 38.2 / 100 | -1.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 47 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2004 | 15.8% | 77 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 62.9 / 100 | -1.5 pp vs world | 50.5% | 156 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 24.4 / 100 | -26.0 pp vs world | 4.7% | 97 of 205 · highest-to-lowest | 52.9 / 100 | -14.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 48 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 77.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2005 | 14.2% | 88 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 58.0 / 100 | -2.8 pp vs world | 43.9% | 167 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 19.8 / 100 | -30.1 pp vs world | 4.6% | 100 of 206 · highest-to-lowest | 51.7 / 100 | +0.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.3 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2006 | 12.9% | 103 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 50.7 / 100 | -4.2 pp vs world | 34.3% | 176 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.5 / 100 | -38.2 pp vs world | 4.7% | 110 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 47.1 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 76.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2007 | 11.8% | 112 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -5.3 pp vs world | 32.7% | 177 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 15.0 / 100 | -39.8 pp vs world | 1.7% | 147 of 207 · highest-to-lowest | 29.1 / 100 | -4.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 75.8 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2008 | 11.1% | 117 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.5 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 38.7% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -31.2 pp vs world | 3.0% | 91 of 208 · highest-to-lowest | 56.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2009 | 11.3% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -4.9 pp vs world | 39.8% | 174 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 17.2 / 100 | -32.8 pp vs world | -4.5% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | +1.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 52 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 75.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2010 | 10.9% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 34.9% | 176 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 16.3 / 100 | -35.9 pp vs world | 3.4% | 122 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 42.1 / 100 | -5.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2011 | 11.0% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 36.7% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -32.6 pp vs world | 9.7% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | +5.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2012 | 10.9% | 115 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.5 / 100 | -5.9 pp vs world | 40.1% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -29.4 pp vs world | 5.2% | 58 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 72.7 / 100 | +2.8 pp vs world | 0.2% | 48 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.5 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2013 | 11.1% | 111 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 47.4 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 43.2% | 157 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 25.4 / 100 | -26.8 pp vs world | 1.0% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -2.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2014 | 11.0% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 43.5% | 160 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.9 / 100 | -28.2 pp vs world | 0.5% | 141 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 33.0 / 100 | -3.7 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2015 | 11.6% | 107 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 49.3 / 100 | -5.4 pp vs world | 48.6% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -27.6 pp vs world | 1.6% | 130 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 38.3 / 100 | -2.0 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2016 | 10.8% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -6.0 pp vs world | 47.9% | 152 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 27.8 / 100 | -29.4 pp vs world | -0.1% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -2.6 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2017 | 10.2% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -6.5 pp vs world | 43.1% | 164 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 22.0 / 100 | -33.0 pp vs world | 0.9% | 150 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 28.7 / 100 | -2.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2018 | 10.7% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -6.2 pp vs world | 44.9% | 158 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 24.9 / 100 | -30.1 pp vs world | 5.2% | 76 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 64.1 / 100 | +1.3 pp vs world | 0.2% | 49 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 77.0 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2019 | 10.0% | 120 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.1 / 100 | -6.4 pp vs world | 44.1% | 155 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 26.3 / 100 | -31.4 pp vs world | -1.8% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2020 | 10.0% | 119 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 43.5 / 100 | -6.3 pp vs world | 37.7% | 167 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 20.6 / 100 | -39.9 pp vs world | -2.2% | 79 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 62.7 / 100 | +0.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2021 | 9.5% | 123 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 41.6 / 100 | -7.3 pp vs world | 34.0% | 172 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.2 / 100 | -41.5 pp vs world | 5.7% | 112 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.9 / 100 | -3.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2022 | 10.6% | 116 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 45.0 / 100 | -5.8 pp vs world | 37.6% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -34.2 pp vs world | -2.5% | 166 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 21.1 / 100 | -4.5 pp vs world | 0.2% | 51 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.1 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2023 | 10.5% | 113 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 46.4 / 100 | -5.5 pp vs world | 41.1% | 162 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 23.0 / 100 | -32.3 pp vs world | 3.0% | 74 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 65.1 / 100 | +1.4 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
| Chile | 2024 | 10.0% | 118 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 44.0 / 100 | -5.7 pp vs world | 37.1% | 171 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 18.7 / 100 | -37.0 pp vs world | 2.7% | 105 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 50.2 / 100 | -0.2 pp vs world | 0.2% | 50 of 210 · highest-to-lowest | 76.6 / 100 | -99.8 pp vs world |
Calculations created by Tesseron World Observatory, data from UNSD Analysis of Main Aggregates (2026-01-28_89ede278; source updated 2026-01-28T00:00:00).
Manufacturing is part of mining, manufacturing and utilities; it is not a seventh broad-industry slice. Share and real growth describe different dimensions.
Current manufacturing specialization